File 013501
The Nearness of Grace: A Personal Science of Spiritual Transformation by Arnold J. Mandell (File 013501)
A scholarly work on spiritual transformation and mysticism by neuroscientist Arnold J. Mandell, exploring connections between science, spirituality, dynamical systems theory, and personal healing based on Kabbalistic and Jewish mystical traditions.
Summary
This book by Arnold J. Mandell examines the intersection of biophysics, neuroscience, and spirituality, tracing the author's intellectual journey from Jewish mystical traditions through modern neuroscience. The work draws on Kabbalistic teachings, particularly the 13th-century work of Abraham Abulafia on ecstatic mysticism and the transformation of human intellect into spiritual states. Mandell connects ancient Jewish mystical concepts with contemporary neuroscientific understanding of brain function, hemispheric lateralization, and neurotransmitter systems. The text explores altered states of consciousness, personal transformation, and the integration of rational thought with spiritual experience.
THE NEARNESS OF GRACEA PERSONAL SCIENCE OF SPIRITUAL TRANSFORMATIONArnold J. MandellTable of ContentsAcknowledgements ………………………………………………………… 3Chapter 1: In Search of the Miraculous .…………………………………. 4Chapter 2: Doesn’t Everybody ……………………………………………. 22Chapter 3: Transmogrifications Of Energies ……………………………. 42Chapter 4: Sensual In-Between Entropies ………………………………. 64Chapter 5: Some Entheogenic Entropies …………..……………………. 87Chapter 6: Pentecostal Phase Transitions ………………………………. 122Chapter 7: Amphetamine Roll-Up And Splitting .………….……………. 144Chapter 8: Faith And Rationality …………………………………………. 168Appendix: An Intuitive Guide to the Ideas andMethods of Dynamical Systems for the Life Sciences …………… 1862ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSAppreciation is expressed to the Fetzer Institute for their support of this work.Particular thanks are due their imaginative Vice President, Dr. Paul Gailey, who shared myvision and hope that these somewhat disparate themes could be blended into a meaningfulwhole. Time and the reading by others will tell whether this idea was realized. The FetzerFoundation and Dr. Gailey have facilitated exploration into blends of science andspirituality, particularly in the context of personal meaning. They also have a history ofsupporting serious work in this era’s most powerful and rigorous exercise in holism asrepresented by the mathematical and applied mathematical fields of modern dynamicalsystems theory. Fetzer’s very special environment and years of dedication haveencouraged the variety of personal meanings within science to emerge and be recognizedas legitimate and important parts of the research enterprise. It would be difficult to imaginea more propitious context for this effort.The book is dedicated to my daughter Buna, and to my intellectual and creativecompanion, Dr. Karen Selz, whose deep and lovely mind wrote much more of this bookthan is formally acknowledged.3CHAPTER 1:IN SEARCH OF THE MIRACULOUSMore than a half-century of naïve persistence and driven search for unity inthe biophysics of mind and personal spirituality as the basis for healingtransformation has led me into many laboratories. The motivation may have beengenetic. My father said that we were descended from several generations of Jewishmystics, none of them able to attain the salaried status of rabbi or cantor. Theseecstatic men lived lives of peripatetic eccentricity, stirring congregations withprovocative insights and uncomfortably personal inquiry. But only for a little while.Soon they were asked to leave the synagogue and often their Eastern EuropeanJewish townships called shtetels as well.My father, in the first generation of our family without rabbis in over aCentury, was a businessman-musician, who in the early mornings studied Talmudiccommentaries. He taught me about why it was that most interpretations of the bookby the rational, physician, lawyer, philosopher, Moses Maimonides, called Guide forthe Perplexed, were in error in their assumption that man cannot understand God’snature with his mind. He took issue with the opinion that the union of a person’sintellect and Spirit with Him was not possible as long as a person was living. IbnTibbon, Maimonides’ best-known early translator and interpreter, relegated thecognitive, analytical, physical and alchemical transformational sciences to theearthly, not spiritual realm. My father disagreed. He espoused the work of the 13 th4Century proponent of a school of Jewish ecstatic mysticism, Abraham Abulafia,whose interpretation of the Guide and his own Commentary on the Secrets taughtthat the human mind, if transformed into a “state of active intellect,” could becomeone with Spirit, realizing the Kingdom of God in rational mystical experience in astate of excitement with new ideas. The new consciousness achieves deepknowledge of both the “upper” and “lower” realms of what he called “reality” bothspontaneously and directly. He said that without personal transformation, thisknowing is not possible.Abulafia’s lesson was that the mundane intellect of man has the potential fortransformation into another kind of mind in a spiritualization of thought. This occursvia developmental stages that begin with intellect and imagination and culminate inwhat he called prophetic emanations. The exercises leading to this transformationare to be strongly willed and practiced with regularity. This work results in ascensionto an ecstatic state accompanied by great intuitive powers, which Abulafia called“prophesy.” Ibn Adret, the Chief Rabbi of Spain at the end of the Thirteenth Century,banished Abulafia from the Country, a Century before the Spanish Inquisitionousted all the Jews.Following what my father said was required in the practice of Kabbalah, a13 th Century tradition of esoteric and mystical interpretations of the Scriptures, Ilearned the secret meanings of each of the twenty-two letter Hebrew alphabet.Much like the Platonic view of mathematics, that it existed before the physicaluniverse, these symbolic equivalences were believed to be eternal in thetranscendental realm. One of the rare written accounts of this oral tradition is in thethirteenth-century Hebrew Book of Splendor called the Zohar which describes theHebrew alphabet as the heavenly code of the cosmos.I learned that the Tegragrammaton’s repeated letter Hei, being fifth in theHebrew alphabet, represents the number five. In the Kabbalistic tradition, Heiimplicates the functional five-partition of the human inner self or soul. The five partsare: nefesh, instinctual drives; ruach, mood, affect and emotions; neshamah,cognitive activities of the mind; chayah, efforts to understand and attaintranscendence; yechidah, experiencing the world as a cosmic unity. Later in life as5a psychoanalytical neuroscientist with a computational bent, the partitions dividedthoughtful, forewarning forebrain from automatic and stereotyped hind brain, thesignal analyzing thalamocortical system from the emotional and impulsive brainstem-limbic, the symbolically logical left from intuitively geometric righthemispheres. We divide the neurotransmitter moods of dopamine aggression fromthe transcendentally erotic serotonin and the organized dynamical states ofperiodicity and quasi(multi)periodicity from the real world complexity of chaos. Ilearned that it is comforting to divide an unknown whole into two or moreunknowable parts.The Jewish guru and Hebraic tutor of my childhood, Rabbi Isadore Kliegfeld,smiled when I told him about my sudden loss of panic during nighttime Hebrewletter meditations. He said that I had had received personal evidence that thesepowerful symbols could call forth the transformational powers of God. He said that Ihad been given a blessing, in Yiddish, a nachas. Maybe panic is not that far fromthe transcendence of an activated mind.In my tenth summer, behind closed door in a hot back bedroom, first byaccidental touch and then by more systematic chaffing, I evoked a pleasurablyurgent and yawning feeling that began in the lower part of my abdomen and back. Itfilled me with thought emptying fullness that a sudden involuntary burst of pelviccontractions found resolution in an hour or two of an unexplainable sadness. I hadbeen struggling to understand my father’s well warn copy of William James’sVarieties of Religious Experience and I wondered if I had been visited by one of thealtered states he described. Was this what he meant by a transformativeexperience? A few months later, a late night meditation produced physicalevidence, a thick, sticky, salty sweet stuff that by morning stuck my sheets together.Later that year, in my father’s library, I found a translation of the 1500 BCE EgyptianBook of the Dead. It contained a creation myth of two Gods in which “rubbing withmy fist, my heart came into my mouth and I spat forth Shu and Tefnut.” Psalm 23,read rather regularly in Sunday school, began to make me wonder about themeanings of“…rod and staff that comforts…” and what was meant by “…my cuprunneth over.” Among the ten regions of the Zohar, connecting the inner world of6man to the upper world, is the tree of ten sefirot in which Yesod , the phallus,occupies a central place. Now we’re allowed to know that G-spot stimulation of thepara-urethral glands in the female can result in spurt as well as a cup that runnethover.Other occasions of the temporal disappearance of the self-conscious Ioccurred while doing the theorem and proof work of high school geometry. Axiomsand the rule bound processes of deduction created difficult journeys from that whichwas given to what should be found. Rocking back and forth in a desk chair forhours, chewing on fingernails, cuticles and pencil ends, time disappeared in a noneself aware state of work-a-day well-being. Sri Aurobindo’s Bhagadvad Gitadescribed this state as one of the rewards of karma yoga. Abulafia’s KabalisticSchool emphasized the importance of hitbodedut, detachment and seclusion inconcentrated thought, as a technique for the attainment of spiritual “intensification.”Stacks of lined yellow paper piled up full of blind alleys as I lived in humblingdumbness. One of my teachers of mathematics described it as the workingmathematician’s dark night of the soul. A breakthrough to a route from premises toproof brought an expansive rush.Engagement in a struggle to fuse two differing contextual worlds may betransporting. Geometric visions can be used to do imageless algebra in a brainstate that feels like intuition. The brain does something like this: Let the number of asequence of unit squares, each side of measuring 0 to 1, be the denominator of aseries of fractions, say fifths. Now put five of these boxes in a row. Then thesequence of all possible fifths, 0/5,1/5, 2/5,..5/5, is inscribed by cutting the verticalsides of the five sequential squares with a diagonal from the lower left of the firstone to the upper right corner of the last. This line cuts each sequential square’sfront boundary with vertical lengths, 0.0, 0.2, 0.4…1.0 in a series of decimalfractions equivalent to the sequence of all possible fifths, the proper fractions 1/5,2/5…5/5. It was Abulafia’s kabalistic belief that symbolic, (algebraic), operations in(geometric) spaces can unify the “upper” and “lower” worlds in the eternal tensionsbetween the body and soul, the inner world and the cosmos, the conflict making theglobal system both sensitive and stable. The geometric-topological approach to7modern dynamical system’s theory describes a convolution of the expansivemotions (as in the upper world) and contractive motions (as in the lower world)embedded naturally in the curved time and space geometries of what are calledhyperbolic spaces. Each point in this space can be visualized as a little saddle inwhich orbital flows from pommel and back flow down to the seat, bringing pointstogether in contracting motion, and flows away from seat down along the sides areexpanding the distance between nearby points.. In the middle of the saddle,simultaneously expansive and contracting orbits demonstrate hyperbolic stabilitycomposed of intersecting destabilizing and stabilizing influences. Loss of thiscountervailing hyperbolic dynamical stability results in global systemtransformations called bifurcations and/or phase transitions.Transformation as a loss of stability is a theme of a recent poetic translationof portions of the Zohar called Dreams of Being Eaten Alive by David Rosenberg.He writes that at some time in the difficult journey through the oftenincomprehensibleZohar, in order to gain entrance to the kabalistic cosmos, therearose what he called “heartbreak.” “No matter how much intellectual study isinvolved, the reader cannot understand the text unless he or she has offered hisheart to be broken on the altar of poetry…and prayer.” Surrender may be the sourceof the strange, uplifting feeling of worked through dumbness.My mother, once a conservatory teaching assistant in piano, sat beside mewhile I practiced almost daily, weekends included, from the age of two until themidteens. Her quiet analytic counter-point sounded mathematical, “You can hearthat that this harmonic progression goes through intervals of fourths of dominantseventh chords.” I felt the persistent lack of harmonic resolution as growing tensionin my groin. “If you transform each of the 12 notes in a chromatic scale, multiplyingit by five (in what mathematicians call) mod 12 (the numbering system goes fromone to twelve, not ten, before it repeats), one can recover the circle of fourths, thecommonest harmonic chord progression in music.” Though her computational talksupported rational thought, in my adolescent heat, the addition of Charley Parker’sflatted fifth and ninth to the dominant seventh chord led suddenly somewhere elseand she knew it. Hearing my arrangement of a Beethoven piano piece become a8mix of classical and modern jazz themes that I called “How High the MoonlightSonata,” she laughed lasciviously as though tickled by this sensual violation ofmusical canon. A boogie-woogie Bach two and three-part invention brought moreexcited disapproval.Mysterious are the conditions of attentive (preoccupied) and none attentive,(fugued out) disappearing time. I found a musical way for it to happen whenimprovising: continue to shuffle a small set of notes that stay within the melodic fieldof the tonal center of an unchanging tonic chord. In contrast, most melodies andtheir chords leave the tonal center to which they return in harmonic and melodicprogression. We can call these conventional tonal centers unstable fixed points.They are attractive repellers of melodic and harmonic expectation. It has beenmathematically proven that these hyperbolic systems are globally stable. Incontrast, a melody that remains stuck in the tonic chord, a purely contracting stablefixed point, is technically a chant. Paradoxically, it can be shown that this kind offixed point is globally unstable. Rigid things can more easily fracture. The rich,altered states of consciousness that emerge while hearing the beat of Tibetanmonks meditating, the Sufi chant-dances of Rumi and the John Coltrane andMcCoy Tyner’s endless, single chord, tenor/piano dialogues exemplify thebifurcation to hallucinatory new stuff arising spontaneously from the experience ofunchanging repetition. Constant repetition of the conditioned (expected) stimulusdrove Pavlov’s dogs, especially those with “nervous temperaments,” into frozen,catatonic states. Abulafia’s 1280 book on ecstatic techniques, Hayyei Ha’OlamHaBa, recommended the recitative rearranging of a finite set of Hebrew letters,frontward and backward, many times, using prayer melodies, until “…the heart willsuddenly become aware of the intellectual, divine and prophetic…” and hitbodedutwill rest upon him. The instructions were “…combine letters (and associated musicalnotes)… reversing and rolling them around rapidly until one’s heart begins to feelwarm.”It was in my freshman year at Stanford University when I met MichaelMurphy, later to co-found Esalon, the California center for mystical pursuits andnaked mud bathing. He is the author of Golf in the Magic Kingdom and with George9Leonard, Integral Transformative Practice. I watched him go through a dramaticpersonal transformation after participating in Professor of Asian Studies, FrederickSpiegelberg’s seminar (with meditation lab) about Sri Arubindo’s interpretation ofthe Hindu Bible, the Bhagavad-Gita. Shortly after the semester, he climbed into anabandoned tower on campus to continue his meditation. He remained there forseveral months, refusing to come down even after the Stanford Student HealthService sent a medical school psychiatrist to investigate. I was more than curiousabout how it was that this hard drinking, and like his brother Dennis, all night pokerplaying, Phi Gamma Delta party boy, had suddenly become a transcendent ascetic.My girl friend Mary and I signed up for Spiegelberg’s seminar in IndianReligions. We were made breathless by his accounts of administering a RorschachTest to the Indian Saint, Swami Sivananda. He recounted discussions about Godwith the artists Paul Klee and Max Ernst and the philosophers Rudolph Otto, PaulTillich, Martin Heidegger and Martin Buber. As homework, Mary and I practicedbreathing awareness mediation twice a day. During the year, Spiegelbergsponsored a visit by the aging but still very lively Aldous Huxley to our seminar. Healso brought us Alan Watts and several lecturers from the Jung Institute of SanFrancisco. Shortly after hearing Huxley talk about the spiritual power of a particularexercise of will and loving thoughts, Mary and I began the daily practice of karessa,some call it coitus reservatus. I was eighteen and she was nineteen. We found thatwithholding an orgasm in order to achieve nirvanic extinction of all desires andpassions was difficult. We spent hours in karessa meditation, trying to experiencethe detachment described in the Bhagadvad Gita. This biblical explication of karmayoga told how it was that the warrior, Ardjuna, instructed by God Krishna in the formof his charioteer, was able to detach sufficiently to do his assigned job of killingwithout emotional involvement. Ken Wilbur, a modern, self proclaimed pandit, anacademically oriented articulator and intellectual justifier of the dharma, the spiritualwork of Hindu and Buddhist practice, contrasts the nirvana (literally “end”)composed of emptiness in time and space, dharma Kaya in which “…no objects arearising…” with the lesson of the Bhagavad-Gita. Its message involved realizing10ones spiritual unfolding within the stream of real time and space, finding emptinessin the world of form and inaction in the world of action.We worked at karessa so ardently that there was barely enough time left todo our assignments in biology and chemistry. In a darkened room, Mary and I laylegs locked, lying on our sides, moving slowly and rhythmically, humming Om andwaiting for our ascension. We worked at making the journey through Sri Aurobindo’ssoul planes of higher mind, illumined mind, infinitive mind, over mind and finally, thesupermind of infinitely empty no mind. This somewhat unusual way to study for athree credit course in Asian Studies at Stanford grew naturally out of the centralmessage of Spiegelberg’s seminar that whereas “…deriving a universal theology isnot possible, having the universal experience is required for an understanding ofany of the world’s theologies.” The controversial Bishop of the Episcopal Diocese ofNewark who teaches that Christian forms continue to evolve, John Shelby Spong,D.D. says, “…every biblical word represents an attempt on the part of our ancestorsin faith to make sense out of a God experience in their time and place. Theexperience …is eternal and real. The explanations will never be eternal and real.They will last only as long as the (cultural) mind-set that created them.”Mary got an A+ grade, topping Spiegelberg’s class with a final examinationessay, which, in literary detail, described her episodes of samadhi, yoga’s state ofunity with the creator. Her 25 page blue book contained accounts of walking fugues,spontaneously strong genital sensations, changes in tastes and smells, suddenfeelings of rising spinal-abdominal kundalini, middle of the night dreams of oceanicorgasmic fusion with God. She failed to mention that she was describing her usualpre-menstrual state.During these college years, I learned about two Isaac Newtons The first I metat elementary physics lectures; the unit was about how things worked calledmechanics. Logically and computationally consistent but taken on faith, I learnedabout an invisible field force between masses called gravity that decayed in strengthlike the inverse of the square of their distances apart and operated in my intuitiveworld like an electromagnetic spirit. Less occult were the expressions ofgravitational fields as contact forces, computed for the tension in the string of a11pendulum or the pressure of the floor on a weight resting upon it. Faith in this realmcame from exercises in physical object visualization followed by manipulation ofself-consistent algebraic symbols. I learned about experiments attesting to the“reality” of these ghostly fields (that now include electric, magnetic and strong andweak nuclear forces), and yet it was the physicists that already believed them whodesigned the machines to demonstrate them. It was Gregory Bateson, MargaretMead’s houseboy, lover, photographer and social anthropologist who said, “Newtondidn’t discover gravity, he invented it.”One college summer I found a second Isaac Newton, perhaps not soestranged from the first. He appeared in the form of a marble bust in the chapel ofTrinity College at Cambridge University, holding the prism he had used to explorethe polychromatic properties of light like a talisman. In his essay called Newton, theMan, the early 20 th Century Cambridge Don and economic theorist, John MaynardKeynes, said that the Newton of the chapel followed “…certain mystic clues whichGod had laid about the world to allow a sort of philosopher’s treasure hunt to theesoteric brotherhood.” Michael White’s biography, called Newton the Last Sorcerer,described his work as an attempt to integrate the magic of the Old World with thescience of the New Age. Newton’s awe over what he saw as the wonders of theuniverse maintained him in private theological study throughout his life. ArthurWaite’s Alchemists Through the Ages describes how Newton’s alchemicalorientation toward the earth’s fundamental substances such as fire, air, wind andwater, their powers and potential for transformation, was joined imperceptibly withhis metaphysics and physics. In his hands, experimental observations involvinggravitation, celestial mechanics and optics, though motivated by esoteric alchemicaltheories, generated experimentally accessible phenomena and testable ideas.The French mathematician, Jacque Hadamard, in his The Psychology ofInvention in the Mathematical Field, said that mystical preoccupations were neverfar from the minds of most of the English and European mathematicians andphysicists of the 18 th and 19 th Centuries. This orientation served as an impetus forthem to pay attention to the almost imperceptible whispers of their emergentthoughts. E.T. Bell, the historian of mathematics and mathematicians said even12Descartes, the essential Enlightenment rationalist, was responsive to his “…call ofthe Spirit…” Napier the inventor of logarithms wrote an exegetical commentary onthe Book of Revelations. The mathematician and physicist, Pascal, believing thatcontact with a religious relic had cured his terminally ill sister, wrote long tracksabout whether or not the Devil could work miracles. The great mathematician,Cauchy, was known for his persistent efforts to convert fellow mathematicians toRoman Catholicism. Gauss, who was not particularly religious, said that a difficult toprove theorem did not result from hard work but “…the grace of God.” In lettersbetween Liebniz, who along with Newton was the inventor of calculus, and amember of the family of great mathematicians, John Bernoulli, used scripturalquotations and biblical diagrams as part of their theoretical correspondence.Perhaps the greatest mathematician of the 18 th Century (or ever), Euler, in hisLetters to a German Princess, discussed the functional characteristics of spirits andthe connections between body and soul. Bell said Euler “…never discarded aparticle of his Calvinist faith.”It was to the working out of a law of mechanics called “the principle of leastaction” that Ernst Mach attributed the beginning of the separation of physicalmechanics from formal theology. The flavor of this change is captured in his 1893The Science of Mechanics that stimulated Bridgeman’s 1936 more formalphilosophical analyses of physical theory, from a position that came to be calledoperationalism: the restriction of physical concepts to those definable in terms of theexperimental operations required to demonstrate or prove them. Mach said thatthese events marked the move of formal metaphysical thinking about mechanicsand the physical sciences more generally into the personal and private realm ofbelief and meaning.Maupertuis, an eccentric friend of Frederick the Great and president of theBerlin Academy, proposed the principle of least action as evidence of the infinitewisdom of the Creator. As an early psychopharmacologist, Maupertuisrecommended the use of opium to facilitate creative thought and was famouslyparodied for doing so by Voltaire in his 1752 story in which he is portrayed as thenaïvely foolish Dr. Akakia. The physical law of least action belongs to a set of ideas13that are called variational analysis. They involve the natural (or miraculous)selection of maxima or minima in quantifiable physical processes. Of all possibletwo-dimensional shapes with the same perimeter, the circle contains the greatestarea; in three dimensions, it’s the sphere. In his Principia, Newton reports his workdetermining the optimal shape of round solids, with circles of revolution having thesame effective cross section, in order to minimize frictional resistance to gravity in amedium.The principle of least action says that imparting energy; say by a kick, to aphysical body on a rigid two-dimensional surface like the earth, results in it takingthe shortest route possible from its initial to final position. The related 1650 Fermat’s“principle of least time” is about light. As Feynman explains in his Lectures inPhysics, “…out of all possible paths that light might take from one point another,light takes the path that requires the shortest time.” Feynman, using elementaryrelations from high school geometry, proved that the least time principle could leaddirectly to Snell’s law of the refraction of light at the interface of two differentconducting media such as air and water. His analogy was the optimal choice of thepath to take in order to rescue a pretty girl drowning in the ocean. Whereas theshortest distance to the girl leads directly into the water, faster running along thebeach to the point that minimizes the distance required for the intrinsically slowerrate of swimming increases the distance traveled but reduces the time required toreach her.Euler attributed the optimization principle to an expression of the meaningand purpose of a loving God. Infused with this spirit, he developed mathematicalmethods describing smooth variations in position of an object in motion, the Eulerdifferential equation, in which differential coefficients are varied to prove theprinciple of least action for mechanical motion. He gave the law Maupertuis’s name.Mach quoted Euler’s conclusion, “As the construction of the universe is the mostperfect possible, being the handiwork of an all-wise Maker, nothing can be met within the world in which some maximal or minimal property is not displayed.” Such faithbased mathematical formalisms were rejected by Joseph Lagrange, an early 19 thCentury mathematician, who, among many other things, proved that every natural14number could be expressed as the sum of at most four squared numbers. It was hisstrongly held opinion that metaphysical speculation was both foreign and inimical tothe conduct of mathematics and science. His work in the calculus of variations ledto the development of a system of algebraic manipulations seeking the value ofconstants, Lagrange multipliers, in place of solving Euler’s differential equations. Itmakes it possible to immediately write down a computable expression for themaximum of a mathematical equation. The technique is now routinely taught to highschool students and with no mention of the role of belief in the perfection of God inits discovery.* * *I was a fortunate freshman medical student. After a visit to his office and astimulating discussion about some of the correspondences between the ideas ofpsychoanalysis and neurobiology, Robert Heath, Tulane Medical School’s GaryCooper-like charismatic chairman of the psychiatry department, offered me a placein his animal and human neurophysiological laboratory. Between classes, eveningsand weekends, I used a Horsely-Clarke apparatus, one of the world’s firststereotaxic devices. It allowed the precise placement of electrodes into functionallyspecific regions of a cat’s brain. The electrodes were cemented to the skull in placeand their wires connected to a device by which the frequency, amplitude and waveshape of the electrical stimulation could be oscilloscopically monitored andelectronically controlled as the conscious cat walked around the room. I spent hoursobserving and recording changes in spontaneous behavior that followed activationof various nuclei in the cat’s brain with small electrical currents.Deep in the part of brain that resides in the upper neck, called the lower brainstem, the region thought to regulate functions such as breathing, heart rate, bloodpressure, gastrointestinal motility and global states of consciousness such aswakefulness and sleep, I found stimulus sites that, after 15 seconds of electricalactivation, led to several minutes of hissing and objectless rage. One cat attackedan empty chair. These regions when activated also inhibited spinal reflexes such as15the knee jerk of the standard neurological examination. Such phenomena werealready well known in the late 1930’s in what W.R. Hess and later John Flynn,following electrical stimulation of cats in the lateral hypothalamus, called“hypothalamic rage.” In the late 1940’s and 1950’s, work by National Institutes ofMental Health’s Paul MacLean attributed it to the actions of parts of the emotional“limbic” brain, particularly the fear-rage-attack coloring of experience by thetemporal lobe’s amygdaloid nucleus. Modern imaging studies in man have shownthat this source of emotional coloring is activated by new information, even beforethe more rational parts of the neocortical brain processes it. How we feel aboutsomething new arises before what we think about it. These survival-oriented statesof fight or flight are known to be biologically universal and demonstrable in evensingle cell organisms.A greater contribution to my brain metaphysics followed observations thatafter several seconds of stimulation of other brain stem sites, the cats became alertbut quiet, staring into space for several minutes. Then, they circled slowly andcurled up on the ground. This was followed by several minutes of grooming andloud purring. Difficult to handle cats became transiently tame, some coming closefor petting. I found that these same sites also increased the amplitude and reducedthe threshold for the cat’s knee jerk reflex. Responsiveness increased withcalmness. Particularly interesting was the finding that electrical induction of thispurring state could immediately stop on-going stimulation-induced episodes ofhissing rage. I referred to these experiments with my friends as myneurophysiological studies of Old Testament vengeance and New Testamentforgiveness. It seemed that the hissing rage would produce eye for an eye and atooth for a tooth hypertension, the talon principle of the Old Testament and Koran.New Testament forgiveness would yield low blood pressure health and Jesus was ahealer. It was about this time in the early 1950’s that Northwestern University socialpsychologist, Jim Olds, found that rats could be trained to push levers to obtaincurrent delivery via electrodes in various parts of their brains. Shortly after, JosephBrady, then of the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, showed that squirrelmonkeys would do the same. With depth electrodes attached to wires running to a16miniaturized electronics box strapped to their belts, some of Robert Heath’sschizophrenic patients spent hours pressing their switches with beatificallyexpectant smiles.It was after several months of cat experiments that Professor Heathsuggested that we spend some time interviewing a hospitalized, chronically illfemale patient, Donna, before and during the time she was being studied withrecording and stimulating depth electrodes in the human neurophysiologylaboratory. Donna, bony thin in a lose fitting green hospital gown and sandals, haddark red toenails, blonde hair and eyes shadowed darkly. In her mid-thirties, shehad never married and, when she could, worked as a beautician. She told us thatsince her menarche at 13, she increasingly often had episodes of spontaneousecstatic rushes along with sudden visions of strong white light. She attributed theseexperiences to visitations of “…an unseen Christ.” She showed me a stack ofnotebooks filled with hand written accounts of her religious experiencesinterspersed with biblical quotations and difficult to follow discussions of what shecalled the Christian ideals underlying the Civil War. She read parts of it to us. Oneof her memorable stories was about being invited to a Children’s Crusade that hadbegun in Georgia, led by a great grandson of Stonewall Jackson. “We were trying tofind the Lord to see if He would part the waters and open up an escape route fromGeneral Sherman’s march to the sea.”From a relatively poor family of Southern Baptists in rural Louisiana, she hadlived in a state psychiatric hospital for almost three years. Her diagnoses rangedfrom borderline schizophrenia to temporal lobe epilepsy. The collateral interviewswith her mother from several years before had been placed in the hospital chart.They recounted that in the patient’s middle to late teens she had become suddenlypromiscuous, frequently approaching strange men in city parks. Obsessed withfellatio and swallowing sperm, she told her mother that she was receiving a holysacrament. More recently, the increasing incidence of ecstatic episodes andcompulsive note taking coincided with the complete loss of interest in sexuality inany form. Her talk was now full of moralizing detail about the shoulds and shouldnots of daily living. She referred to herself as a non-Catholic nun who was married17to Christ. The brain waves recorded from electrodes deep in her brain demonstratedtransient episodes of spiking in a midline limbic structure called the septum and inthe right hippocampus, deep in the temporal lobe. Paul MacLean and others sincehave shown that electrical stimulation of these and related brain regions couldproduce pleasure and grooming reactions in cats and prolonged penile erections insquirrel monkeys.Many years later, I spoke about Donna with the Harvard professor ofneurology, Norman Geschwind. He took me to his twice a week epilepsy clinic. Inan effort to demonstrate what is now known as the Geschwind Syndromes ofbetween seizure, inter-ictal personality changes in patients with temporal lobeepilepsy, he stood in front of the patients’ waiting room. In a loud voice, he askedthat all people keeping diaries and personal notebooks please stand up. Several didso, some displaying their notebooks in outstretched hands. The pages that I sawwere filled mostly with religious writing, biblical quotations and exclamation points.Gathering the positive responders together, he asked them in turn what religion theywere. Several answered the question with the question, “When?” It turned out thatmany reported having several experiences of religious conversion. Geschwindcalled them “Jamesian Episodes” after William James’ Varieties of ReligiousExperience. He then asked when was the last time they engaged in sexual activity.For most of them, including those that were married, it had been years. Thought themen said they were not impotent, experiencing early morning spontaneouserections, they claimed a complete loss of interest in sex though feeling warmlyaffectionate toward people generally. As he anticipated, the patients wereemotionally intense and unstoppably loquacious, needing to speak at length abouttheir moral philosophies. They persisted in following us around the clinic waitingroom, several speaking at once. In his lectures and papers, Geschwind called thislast feature, difficulty in separation, interpersonal “stickiness.” First reported by theFrench electroencephalographer, Henri Gastaut, a history of multiple ecstaticreligious experiences, increasing emotional intensity and lability, hyposexualilty (notimpotence), moralizing religiosity, compulsive and frequently poetic writing andtendency to cling to people is now called the Geschwind Syndrome of temporal lobe18epilepsy. Some say it is relevant to the likes of Apostle Paul, Sister Teresa andJoan of Arc.One evening in the human neurophysiology laboratory, I was invited by Dr.Heath to join him and several other brain scientists behind a two-way mirror towatch an interview with Donna while electrical current was being put through herrecording electrodes. We watched and listened as a psychiatrist interviewed herabout her past. The patient was speaking about her childhood. Unseen by thepatient, the neurophysiologist, with us behind the mirror, was intermittently pushingthe button evoking brain stimulation with very low current applied to the septum. Dr.Heath told me to listen for subtle changes or discontinuities in the flow of the ongoingconversation that he said might reflect alterations in her thoughts andfeelings. .“The first time we were allowed to take a break from Sunday school for thechurch service and I got to hear the choir and the pipe organ, I suddenly got afeeling of happiness that I hoped would last forever. My Sunday school teacher toldus how much Jesus loved us and that’s what the music made me feel like. For thefirst time in my life I felt completely safe.” Though the two way mirror I saw thepsychiatrist nod silently. “When I learned about the real meaning of Christmas andEaster, it was frightening and beautiful.”Within a few seconds after the neurophysiologist, behind the mirror andunseen by the patient or her interviewing physician, pushed the switch on thestimulus generator, the patient stopped talking. After a little more silence, herinterviewer encouraged her to continue,“You were talking about how beautiful the holidays were. Tell me in whatways?”“I don’t want to talk about that anymore.” She blushed and looked veryuncomfortable. The neurophysiologist’s hand remained on the switch. Shecontinued to speak with her psychiatrist.“I have to ask you a favor and I don’t know why. I hope you don’t get upset.The thought won’t leave me alone.” She seemed embarrassed even as her bodyrelaxed against the back of the chair languorously.19“Of course not, Donna. You know that with me you can say anything.”Her face reddening further, she stuttered something unintelligibly and thenwas silent.“Pardon me, Donna, I didn’t hear what you said.”“Would you mind if I rested my legs on your shoulders?”Further Readings for In Search Of The MiraculousThe Hebrew Alphabet, A Mystical Journey, Edward Hoffman, Chronical Books, SanFrancisco, 1998The Book of Letters, A Mystical Alef-bait, Lawrence Kushner, Jewish LightsPublishing. Woodstock, Vt., 1990Studies in Ecstatic Kabbalah, Moishe Idel, State University of New York Press,Albany, N.Y. 1988Beyond the Human Species, The Life and Work of Sri Arubindo and The Mother,Georges van Vrekhem, Paragon House, St. Paul, MN, 1997Bhagadvad Gita, Sri Aurobindo, Lotus Press, Twin Lakes, WI, 1995Play of Consciousness, Swami Muktananda, Syda Foundation, South Fallsburg,NY, 1978Alchemical Psychology, Old Recipes for Living in a New World, Thom F. Cavalli,J.P. Tarcher/Putnam, NY 2002Studies in Schizophrenia, A Multidisciplinary Application to Mind BrainRelationships, Robert G. Heath, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA 195420Role of Pleasure in the Brain, Robert G. Heath, Harper-Row, N.Y. 1964Psychiatric Aspects of Neurological Disease, D. Frank Benson and Dietrich Blumer,Grune and Straton, N.Y. 1975.Mathematics –The Music of Reason, Jean Dieudonne, Springer-Verlag, N.Y. 1991Mathematics for the Liberal Arts, F. Richman, C.L. Walker, R.J. Wisner and J.WBrewer, Simon and Schuster, N.Y. 1998The Feynman Lectures on Physics, R.P. Feynman, R.B. Leighton and M. Sands,Addison Wesley, Reading, MA, 196321CHAPTER 2:DOESN’T EVERYBODYVarieties of religious experience and the potential they bring for personalchange are embedded in and perturbative of our unique and common personalities.The obsessive compulsive may have an easier time with the rigid restrictions ofFundamentalism or be more resistant to the flagrancy of none rational mysticalexperience. The hysteric may find subjective evidence for the Holy Ghost moreaccessible and rules of behavior beside the point. The potential for double-jointedmultiplicity in personal styles and quick transitions between them characterize whatis called the borderline personality. It is in these ways that temporary andpermanent brain styles in us and important others supply much of the ground for thepossibility of spiritual transformation and the often attendant alterations inpersonality. How can we think about this facilitator and source of resistance to newspiritual practice?A skinny, knobby kneed, small breasted, mousy haired, bright-eyedpsychotherapy patient of mine at UCLA’s Neuropsychiatric Institute OutpatientClinic was among the highest priced Santa Monica call girls serving Beverly Hills.Answering my unaskable question about her thousand-dollar fee, she explained thatshe was living proof that, in her profession, what was more important than physicalbeauty was “griv sense.” She explained that by her middle twenties, she had22developed the ability to anticipate the most highly prized but often embarrassing-tosaylonging for a particular sexual act without being asked. She told me that shehad to “empty out my personal sex manual” to feel the cravings of her clients. Whatthe john most wanted appeared suddenly in her mind in the form of a cartoon. Auniversity criminologist later explained that the word “griv” was probably derivedfrom what pick pockets call grift sense, the ability to intuit who was likely to haveenough money in their billfold to justify the risk, even if they appeared in the wornclothes and dated cars of old money.In his 1913 Dernieres Penses, Henri Poincare′, France’s seminal theorist innonlinear dynamical systems theory, described intuition as a mental faculty whichallows us to “…immediately see the end from afar…” In the context of mathematicalepistemology, the instantaneous images of a geometer contrast with the laboredsequential logic of the mathematical analyst. Poincare′ claimed that inclinationstoward one or the other of these two cognitive styles and their associatedmathematical tools arise from different kinds of minds. He contrasted the 19 thCentury German mathematicians, Weierstrass, who he said reduced his generaltheory of functions to “…a prolongation of arithmetic…without a single (pictorial)figure in any of his books…” with Riemann who called geometry to his aid indescribing functions. He created “…an image that no one can forget… once heunderstood it.”Experiencing the behavior of others, we create a set of anticipations aboutwhom and how they are that align with parts of ourselves. Aware of one aspect of aperson, we imagine the others. With a small amount of initial information, weconnect the dots, fitting features we have seen and heard to personalityconfigurations stored by informal category in our brain files. Our conclusions aboutthem “being one of those” can both facilitate and impair our perceptions. Easternmetaphysicians, Western mystical religionists, socially liberal secular humanists,Shannon information theorists and today’s students of dynamical systems in brainand behavior can, in different ways, make the case that the content of thesestereotypes reflect a pattern of constraints, our personal limitations resulting fromthe rutted roads of worldly experiences. Baba Muktananda, the Hindi Saint from the23Indian village of Ganeshpuri, called them our samsara. These limit the formlessnessof anticipation that underlies sensibility. Our samsara reduces the uncertainty thatcould serve as grounds for new perceptions and understanding of others. Preemptivedistortions reduce the bandwidth available for new information. They impairthe range of empathic relations with others as well as ourselves. These restrictionsin possibilities and choices are expressed in enduring patterns of behavior, thinkingand feeling that mental health practitioners call personality and character. Whenconfronted with these constrictions, the self justifying and diagnostically revealingthought about a feature of one’s personality is, “…doesn’t everybody? “ This pride inour shape contrasts with the teachings about emptiness of one of Baba’s favoriteIndian holy men, Zipruanna, who sat all day, loin clothed naked in a garbage dump,instructing his students and followers about knowing and being nothing.We quantitate deficiencies in formlessness using statistical measures ofentropy. They characterize the system’s behavior as a distance from the state ofhighest entropy also known as maximal randomness. Professor Karen Selz ofEmory University did a study in which her human subjects, after taking a battery ofpersonality inventories, were asked to remove as many dots as possible from acomputer screen full of them in three minutes. They were to do so by left clicking oneach of them with the mouse key. Two seconds after a dot was removed, itreappeared and became subject to removal again. As they went about the dotremoval task and unbeknown to the subjects, the orbit inscribed by their dotremoving mouse travels was recorded for later graphic representation andquantification. Most subjects with the usual broad mixture of personality traitsinscribed a wide variety of orbital line styles: little wiggles, big wiggles, large andsmall loops, little smooth slides and big and little jumps. The counter-intuitivecoupling of stylistic rigidity and whole system instability (as in non-hyperbolic fixedpoints described in the previous essay and below) is in evidence at the personalityand graphical extremes of her subject group.A fastidious, rigidly organized, severely obsessive-compulsive subjectrepeatedly removes the same dot, only occasionally moving to a neighboring one todo more repetitious left key mouse clicking. Very little of the large computer screen24of possible mouse travels is occupied. All the action is centered on a small set ofpoints. When such a minimal entropy person is injured and feeling helpless, theirstuckness can grow bizarre. Ruminative fixation in self-critical and persecutoryideas extend into poisoned food anorexia, circular pacing, weight loss and middleof-the-night,worried insomnia. Suffused with sin, they ask forgiveness for soiling thechair by their sitting in it or smelling up the room with their body odor.At the high entropic extreme, the mouse orbits of the seductively dramatic,new reality-creating hysteric includes big jumps, disorganized whorls and large andsmall restless and short attention span scribbles that tend to fill up the entire screen.The fragility of fixation at this end manifests itself in breakdown into impulsively outof-controland floridly dramatic displays. Their decrease in contact with realityprecipitates social chaos around them. The Montreal behavioral neurologist, PierreFlor-Henry, using electroencephalographic and psychological test data, describedthe difference between these two extreme forms of personality expressions as theoverly dominant expressions of one or another of the left obsessional or righthysteric hemispheric emotional styles. As examples, Flor-Henry said that a left halfbrain depression feels like hopeless and agitated indecision and the depression ofthe right brain is an experience of emptiness like homesickness. Left-brainhappiness is being exactly correct and right brain joy rushes like being especiallychosen.The church going obsessional resonates with the sermon of the punitivepriest who invokes the tension and relief of sin and salvation. The practice canresult in a life long addiction to the transient high of this temporary forgiveness. Inother churches, the hysterical character gets spiritual respite in disassociativevisitations of the Holy Ghost and attendant signs and wonders. At Wednesday nighthealing services, new hope arises from personal surrender in a floor hitting,backward collapse called dying in the Lord. Both of these antipodal personalitiescontrast with the more receptive state of in-between entropy (with enough entropyavailable to form messages) which predicts more flexibility and higher potential forundistorted information processing. Relatively style-less and ego-less people aremore open to hearing a variety of Gods in themselves and others. High alertness25without presupposition, ecstatically aware and selfless, it is God’s gift realized, ajoyfully awake and nonjudgmental empty state of transcendence. As we sit, we workat feeling this in the brain of the enigmatically smiling stone Buddha.The externally inactive state of high internal activity, the Bhagavad-Gita’sformlessness in the world of form, inaction in the world of action, has a naturalmathematical representation in the simultaneously expanding and contractingmotions of hyperbolic dynamics and its associated entropic descriptors. How canthis kind of formlessness equip us for almost instantaneous knowing? In a restingstate of uniform hyperbolicity that only looks like randomness, accurate impressionsof others can arise quickly and from only a few data points of observation. In thelate 1960’s, University of California mathematician, Rufus Bowen, proved the nowfamous shadow theorem. This says that in dynamical states of hyperbolicity, directlyobservable on the screen in computer simulations, the first few points of the ongoingwild dynamical dance that appears to jump randomly from here to there onthe computer screen, counter-intuitively will quickly outline the entire skeleton of itsfuture global shape, its geometry, though more time of observation is required torealize this structure in full detail. The contracting motions on the stable surface ofaction, called a manifold, “iron down” all the points onto the unstable manifold thatserves to outline the shape of the attractor of all starting points. In such a system,observation of just the first few points outline the whole. Intuition, anticipatoryknowing and that which some call prophesy, may be expressions of the hyperbolicbrain’s mind doing dynamical shadowing.To review briefly, hyperbolic brain flow is made up of three decomposablecomponents: (1) The apparently predictable one along the main road of the action,going straight ahead and round and round on a throughway called the centermanifold—analogous perhaps to what might be a sequentially logical development;(2) Intersecting the center manifold transversally is a field of influence moving theaction away from the center manifold with out-of-the-box motion, exploring sidepaths of unpredictably new, creative possibility called the unstable manifold, wemight think about inspired risk-taking, impulsive associations in thought; (3) Anothertransversally intersecting field of influence, which conservatively, rationally, “irons26down” the expansive flow back onto the road, the entire constrictive field called thestable manifold. This influence herds points into shadowing the main road of thedynamics, like the hair of the dog that stay close to the real body of the animal inmotion. It is in this way that just a few often slightly off the mark points nonethelessshadow the real (called fiduciary) orbits of the attractor, outlining its global geometrywith just a little information.The intuitive reason shadowing works is built into these natural countervailingtendencies of hyperbolic dynamics, which on one hand tends to spread out nearbyinitial points and brings disparate others together. The latter inclination is the onethat smoothes down the escaping points onto surfaces of actions thatmathematicians call manifolds. However, the details of the orbital paths don’t lookthat orderly due to the mixing of the sequence of points in hyperbolic motion. Themixing process on manifolds has been analogized to that of the bundled pink loopsof the stretching (expanding) and folding (contracting) taffy puller at the carnivalcandy stand. The process gets sequences of small particles of candy out ofsequential order while maintaining the taffy’s overall geometrically ovoid shape.Disorder is local with the entropy being generated by the repeatedly shuffling of theline up of the original orbital sequence. This results in the impossibility of any pointto-pointprediction for more than a few points even though the over all shape ismaintained. Exactly what minute a habitually late sleeper awakes can’t bepredicted. On the other hand, the skeletal manifold of the global structure is entirelyin evidence from almost the beginning. Late risers remain late risers even without aprecise, minute-to-minute, predictable schedule.It is also interesting that a uniformly hyperbolic dynamical system, unlike thefixed-point attractors of stylistic fixation, resist perturbation-induced changes inglobal dynamical form. In an apparent paradox worthy of metaphysical allusion, thedynamically hyperbolic kind of formlessness has structural stability. The globalgeometric predictability of this point-to-point, completely unpredictable system canbe both the subject and object of Zen frustration and thoughtful meditation.During weekly professorial rounds at Los Angeles’s NeuropsychiatricInstitute, I assigned a standard exercise for psychiatric residents on clinical rounds,27which involved limiting their contact with a patient to five minutes. This was followedby detailed discussion of everything we’d seen and heard. I’d ask them to predictwhat we’d find in the many pages of personal interviews and nurses observations inthe clinic chart. The student psychiatrists with the most street smarts, calledemotional intelligence by Daniel Goleman, were particularly quick at shadowing andthus predicting the patient’s global dynamical pattern.Do personality patterns exist? Evidence from biometric studies of thehereditary aspects of personality style in animals and humans suggest thatrelatively few global component properties underlie a variety of complicated-lookingmanifestations of behavioral style. Primary colors are the source of all hues.Harvard psychologist, Jerome Hagen, has reviewed the history of this idea in hisbook, Galen’s Prophecy. While there are differences among personality researchprograms, almost all rating scale and questionnaire-based studies result in clustersof traits that reflect statistically associated properties which when taken together arecalled temperament. This idea is close to what we mean by personality. Theserelatively few response clusters are given descriptive names such as introversion,extroversion, neuroticism, impulsivity, sociability, task persistence and tolerance ofambiguity. As defined by psychological inventories, studies of families show thatthese styles are heritable in the range of 60%.Hans Eysenck, in over four decades of work and more than 5000 publishedpapers from London’s Maudsley Hospital, derived common global factors ofpersonality using questionnaires. The best known was called the EysenckPersonality Inventory. His studies resulted in evidence for only a few fundamentalbehavioral axes, behavioral manifolds, which describe extremal properties ofpersonality types analogous to stable and unstable manifolds: introversionextroversion,shyness-sociability, low and high activity level and emotionalconstriction versus impulsivity.To make the issue of personality as dynamical system more realisticallycomplex, we can call on some examples of the rich history of behavioral geneticstudies using animals such as the mouse. They can be selectively bred forunderlying personality factors, such as dominance, fear, aggression or exploratory28courage. Not surprisingly, social interactions, as configured by the mouse’s ownpersonality style, contributed significantly to their behavioral patterns. As anexample, the C57BL strain of laboratory mouse has strong tendencies towardimpulsively wild behavior. To be anthropocentric and using Hagen and Eysenck-likebehavioral dimensions, we could describe the C57BL mouse as exhibiting highpsychotocism, P, energetic sociability, high energy, E, and low emotionality, lowneuroticism, N. The C57BL also loves alcohol and will dominate the low E, shy, lowP, retiring, alcohol avoidant, high N, emotional, anxious, frequently defecating albinoBALB strain of mouse when they are placed together for a limited time in a novelsituation during the daylight hours. Over a more extended time, however, the BALBmouse comes to dominate the C57BL, beginning with attacks in the dark and finallyas the persistent and patient survivor over days of aggressive fighting. BALB’s lowE, social fear eventually turns into rage and aggression. The C57BL is quick to mateand ejaculate but very slow to recover sexually, so that the less post-orgasmicallyrefractory BALB also wins in long term sexual competition in a cage full of fecundfemales. Modern social psychological approaches to human personality arebeginning to approach the interactions of genetic brain proclivities and collectivesocial dynamics in this way.Employing Eysenck categories of personality characteristics, similar resultsabout style as influenced by genetic selection can be seen in humans. Thecorrelations between factor scores based on B. Loehlen’s studies using theCalifornia Personality Inventory in twins demonstrated as much as threefold highercorrelations among identical twins for extroversion (E) and neuroticism (N) factorscompared with matched fraternal twins. The primacy of some of the in-bornbiological roots of these personality styles is suggested by G. Methany’s finding ofhigher correlations between identical as compared to fraternal twins when studied atthe age of two months. The similarities in personality and temperament measuresincluded activity level, regularity, approach-withdrawal, intensity, persistence,distractibility and adaptability.More recent familial studies of the heritability of personality characteristicsincluded childhood shyness, neuroticism, depressive symptoms, aggressiveness,29behavioral inhibition and anxiety, behavioral flexibility, narcissism, deviant motoractivity levels, novelty seeking, harm avoidance and reward dependence. Thesestudies were conducted by R.R. Crowe, J.F. Rosenbaum, A. Methany, and J.LRobinson and indicated familial congruity of these characteristics among first andsecond degree relatives in the range of 40-50%. This level of heritability ingenetically unrelated family members was found to be less than 20%.Low entropy fixations of personality can also evolve developmentally.Experiments in young animals have shown that stress-induced high levels ofadrenal hormones exaggerate the normal developmental process of trimming backunused neural connections, called pruning, the normally complexly over-grownsprouting pathways. The pruning actions of the pituitary-adrenal stress hormonescome to dominate sprouting actions of neural growth factors and their protection ofneuronal axonal branching and connections during development. The researchprogram of Bruce McEwan of Rockefeller University and others document nerve cellloss resulting from the neurohormonal concomitants of stress. This reduction inneuronal connectivity and neuronal cell content has been conjectured to contributeto the pathological simplification of neuronal projections and neural networkcomplexity, reducing information processing capabilities. The still intact machineryunderlying the global patterns of neurological activity, such as those that underliepersonality styles, is arranged around these pruned, unoccupiable holes of lostbrain possibility. If this range of potential behavior is extremely reduced, thebehavioral syndrome is often called a personality disorder. Those that have one arethe predictable Johnny one notes of response to perturbation: thrash out, lie withoutreason, get drunk, binge on promiscuity, steal unneeded things from departmentstores, or withdraw into interpersonal isolation.A more abstract and quantifiable way of representing the pathologicalsimplification-induced emergence of low entropy, stereotypical personality style isinscribed on the head stone of the post-suicidal grave of Ludwig Boltzmann. Thisfather of modern statistical physics expressed the idea in the form of atransformation: the (maximal) entropy, S, of a system is the logarithm of thenumber,Ω, of its available ways of being, (i.e., S = log Ω). That is, one way a30reduction in the dynamical entropy of a system can occur is by reducing the numberof its available states. As the repertoire of ways of personal responding, log Ω, isreduced, so is the brain system’s entropy, S.Reality constrained patterns of behavior, as in successfully adaptivepersonalities, lie in some optimal in-between place between the maximal andminimum measures of entropy. The dynamical state that is postulated to yield inbetween-valuedentropies is called nonuniform hyperbolicity. This is best seen whenthe values of the experimental observations are plotted in a two dimensional phasespace with each point represented by two values: along the x-axis is plotted thevalue observed, along the y-axis is graphed the change in the value from the lastobservation. The signatory motions of these observations plotted in phase spaceare irregularly varying in rate of expansion (near by initial values are separating intime) and contraction (greatly differing initial values are coming together in time).Values are not fixed, rhythmically varying nor in random motion. Thesenonuniformly hyperbolic motions are seen in speeded up, talking head videosshowing bursts of hand gestures and in normal neuronal activity. Silences havewidely varying lengths and bursts of hand movements and neuronal discharges areirregular in duration and character. The statistical pattern of neuronal inter-burstintervals is not the convergent Gaussian distribution of I.Q. or heights but thenonconvergent, long tailed, Levy distribution of flood incidences and, according toMandelbrot, stock market crashes.The labored logic and inscrutably compact mathematical formalisms of theNobel Prize winning physicist, Ilya Prigogine, and his Belgian school, explain thethermodynamics of these long lasting niches of restricted variation in our personalstyle as energy requiring dissipative structures. Compulsive nail biting, drivenpromiscuity, readiness to be suspicious are seen as a persistence of deviationsfrom the maximum entropy of formless, flexible, receptive end states. The system istrapped in possibility reduced, energy requiring, samsaric niches of what Prigoginecalled minimal entropy generation. We unique and oddly shaped and entropyleaking balloons maintain our characteristic distortions through energy-requiring,31persistent efforts at insufflation. The maintenance of neurotic defenses andeccentric habits can be fatiguing.* * *The children at Kids in Distress Residential and Day Care Center inSoutheast Florida, called KIDS, tended to be small for their ages. As a psychiatricconsultant to the Center, I often summarized an evaluation of both their physicaland intellectual development as “delayed.” Looking like almost completely formedadult-like personalities, however, they were developmentally “advanced.” I heard ina child analytic seminar at the Psychoanalytic Institute of Southern California thattraumatized children often hurry through the dangerous developmental ambiguity ofopenness and flexibility to the predictable, fixed attitudes and behavior of adults. Itwas common to find prematurely wise young children serving as parents inchaotically dysfunctional families. In residence at the Center, set free from theirpathogenic homes by social workers and family law judges, these prematurecaregivers lost sleep worrying about who was taking up their obligations to thesisters and brothers left behind.Trauma-induced possibility pruning was often obvious in the young refugeesat Kids in Distress. Having been soaked in alcohol containing, nutritionally deficient,crack-laced amniotic fluid, young babies were then left in dirty cribs behind lockeddoors to cry themselves into exhausted despair. Their mothers were working thestreets for drugs. The children that survived often demonstrate personality stylesthat are reduced in variety. They came to use a few, individualized, and stereotypedtechniques for survival. Some children’s insulated detachment was hollowlydisguised as interpersonal caring. Others used driven and rigid compulsion tomaintain the appearance of conscientious good citizenship. For some children,paranoid thoughts were realistic expectations. .Arriving at the Center I heard “Dr. Arnold! Dr. Arnold!” in high-pitchedscreams. Several children ran up to me at once, demanding to be held. Someleaped into my arms for a hug. Trying to get and hold their visual gaze was another32matter. Their eyes darted back and forth across my face, not stopping at my eyes,as though checking for danger. It felt like a strange mix of physical clinging andinterpersonal distantiation. Many articles in the International University Press’sPsychoanalytic Studies of the Child book series, described these prematurelyformed child personality types: the paranoid scouts, the detached as if childrenpretending to feel, the desperate to please obsessionals, the charismaticallyseductive hysterics and the unconscionable psychopaths.Experiments simulating trauma and neglect in young animals alsodemonstrate acceleration in biobehavioral development. Possibilities, the number ofavailable states, Ω, brain entropies as S = log Ω, become casualties of traumaticand neglected early life. Like one trick ponies, these abused and abandonedchildren take up singular patterns of behavior that seem to work and stick to them.One doesn’t anticipate seeing such narrowly fixated personality patterns until lateadolescence or adulthood. They appear at ages too young to qualify for thecharacter pathology coding of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual IV. Yet thelabels of adult personality disorder seem inescapable when one sees a four-yearoldchild trapped in a compulsive hand washing ritual or a panty flashing five-yearoldgirl with a seductive gait.Four-year-old Alicia rubbed the lumps in my right hip pocket containingcaramel candies. Her blue eyes twinkled. Her long blonde hair was in bangs andher lips in a pout. She kept a hand on her hip and tilted her pelvis as she spoke.Listening to children’s stories, she straddled the reader's thigh and rocked. Aliciahad a history of sexual abuse in a home that was a hang out for drug dealers. Therewere rumors that she talked to strange men late at night on the phone. Onadmission to the Center, she was found to have genital herpes. Both of her parentshad been in and out of prison for drug-related crimes. The Center’s staff spoke ofAlicia’s seductive smiles, incessant demands, irritable complaints and tantrums.With the back of her hand held against her forehead, she said that it was too hot topick up the toys she had scattered around the fenced yard. Ordered to comply,Alicia took three steps into Florida’s summer heat and fainted. Each morning, shespent the better part of an hour in front of the mirror, trying on all four of her dresses33and their scarf and belt accessories before choosing one for her appearance at thebreakfast table.Five-year-old Grace was a suspicious and dictatorial presence in theCenter’s kindergarten class. Articulate and righteous, she confronted children andstaff alike with evidence for the unfairness she found everywhere. In legalisticdefense of her rights and sometimes those of her peers, she used her strong wideface, penetrating look and quick and observant mind aggressively. Her somewhatintimidated childcare worker maintained Grace's cornrowed hair with care. Sensitiveto criticism and quick to anger, she competed with her teacher for control of theclass. Her drug abusing young mother had escaped from her own mother’sauthoritarian house, leaving six-month-old Grace in the care of her commandinggrandmother, a matronly church elder. Recent studies by David Reiss andassociates at George Washington University assessed psychosocial dynamics ingenetically varied families. They found that genetic similarities amplified theexpression of individual characteristics of interpersonal relating through what mightbe called personality resonance. Relatives often commented that Grace and hergrandmother, being alike, deserved one another. Shortly after her fourth birthdayGrace was removed from her grandmother's home while the circumstancessurrounding the accidental scalding of the bottom half of her body in an overheatedbath were being investigated. She began her first conversation with me, “Hey doctorbaldy, why are your bottom teeth so crooked?”Damon was darkly handsome, with teasing eyes and a gleaming smile.Talking to his legal guardian on the pay phone in the afternoon of his second day atKIDS, he was heard to be making charges of mistreatment by the staff. He askedhis guardian, loud enough to be heard throughout the day room, “What does it taketo get someone fired around here?” Six years old and abandoned by his mother atthe age of three, Damon came to KIDS with a history of provoking administrativeconflicts at several children’s shelters. His record showed that once he successfullyused accusations of beatings to get a staff member fired employing charges thatwere later shown to have been fabricated. He argued persuasively, manufacturingevents and quoting imaginary conversations with smooth confidence. He could34change stories midstream without apparent loss of continuity or confidence. Helearned the power of a claim of abuse, and used the threat of it to control hisenvironment. Damon talked other children out of their candy allotments, cheated atgames and stole clothes from other children’s lockers.Debbie, age eight, was the eldest of four children. Her mother was a streetprostitute with an expensive drug habit. Debbie was thin, restless and worried. Aself-appointed mother from the age of four, Debbie felt responsible for the care andfeeding of her brother and two sisters. With a history of physical and sexual abuseby a series of her mother’s boyfriend-pimps, Debbie spent most of her time cleaningand recleaning their small apartment and worrying about obtaining enough food forher brothers and sisters. Her mother was often gone for one or two days at a time,and food supplies were not dependable. On several occasions, Debbie was caughtstealing food from all night grocers. The investigative social worker reported thatDebbie had learned to sell oral sex to the men who loitered behind a neighborhoodbar. She used the money to buy food. For several days after admission to the crisishome, Debbie was anxious and sleepless. She worried endlessly about the welfareof her sisters and brother despite reassurances that they were in caring fosterhomes. She checked on them as frequently as allowed by phone. In a playroomtherapy session, wielding a rubber knife, she pointed to a scar on her left forearmand told a story about the time that she cut herself with a kitchen knife and fed herblood to her infant sister when there wasn’t any food in the house. Debbie kept herroom very tidy, did all her chores and sometimes those of other children. Even afterseveral months in residence, always-busy Debbie didn’t have even one closerelationship with any of the other children or members of the staff.Despite the superficial differences, there are subtle and pervasive similaritiesamong the personality styles of Alicia, Grace, Damon and Debbie. Like overgrownand tasteless cabbages, pale and four feet across, growing from seeds over-treatedwith gibberellin or auxin plant hormones, the inner lives of these prematurely biglittle people are relatively empty of stable interpersonal objects. The pantheon ofindwelling companions are either malignant, absent or both. There is a deficiency ofinternalized significant others with qualities we more healthy neurotics paste onto35new faces which we then love and hate. Instead, every interpersonal arrangementis new, suspect and run on a cash-and-carry basis. We are made to feel like thereare no seats for us inside of them. Even Debbie, with her history of selfless motherlydevotion to her “children,” felt like an empty husk, encased in the exoskeletal armorof compulsive correctness. With their inner life unpeopled, the best we on theoutside can hope for is to be valuable to them as tools, like forks and chairs.In new and potentially therapeutic settings, for example a genuinely lovingfoster family, these children manipulate, testing for the feared loss and abuse thatfirst generated their detachment. They provoke the very mistrust they fear. Thesexually exploited child is seductive. The physically abused child provokes attack.Personality constellations which can be adaptive, when narrowed and fixated,become impediments to new and reparative experience. It is in this way thatpersonality disorders are self-maintaining.An irony is that these interpersonally empty and rigid patterns in personalitytend to occur in the most constitutionally robust of the abused and neglectedchildren. They are those who have escaped early death from failure to thrive,severe neuropsychological impairment, chronic depression, severe socialwithdrawal or the pediatric psychotic disorders. The children with sufficient flexibilityto adapt quickly and survive often settle into empty-centered rigid caricatures ofadult personality styles.Of course, well-defined and characteristic personality patterns do not requireabandonment and abuse or the pathological simplification of traumatic deforestationof neuronal connectivities in order to emerge. Demanding social selection ofparticular personality proclivities that are competitively advantageous for highlysought positions also results in the appearance of well-defined personality styles.Common examples are the technical types, “techies,” “nerds,” whose work requirelong hours alone to master and execute, as in doing mathematical proofs, solvingproblems in theoretical physics, unraveling computer programming problems orwriting highly technical tracks. These activities can be aided by the personalityinclinations of shyness and distantiation, the experience of discomfort in socialoccasions along with a rich private fantasy life. Diagnostically oriented mental health36professionals (and lonely mates) may label these interpersonally distant,engineering rocket science people, “high functioning” sufferers of Asperger’s autisticspectrum disorder. Things going on inside get most of the attention, having moreimpelling importance than those on the outside involving other people. A recentstudy by Cambridge University’s Autism Research Center compares theempathizing (E) versus systemizing (S) ability of normal controls and adults withAsperger Syndrome and find the quasi-autistic adults are deficient in E and superiorin S. They call it the E-S theory of autistic spectrum diseases. Psychotherapists ofthese autistic spectrum personality types, patients who characteristically do notseek therapy but are forced into the office by marital or family conflict, speak of theirlong, patient and mighty struggles to make intimate contact with these clients. Amore philosophical question involves issues of what are acceptable individualdifferences and why it is that these high functioning, highly paid and successfulprofessionals have any diagnosis at all.It is not surprising that the highest paid members of corporations producingtechnical products and services such as IBM and Oracle are those rare individualsin technical sales that are able to combine the skills and insights of introvertedscientists and technicians with those of the gregariously successful salespersons. Inbusiness schools such a blend is seen in people who combine talents in bothmarketing and finance. In architecture this combination might take the form of agraphic-design artist with computational mechanical engineering skills. Recruitersknow that it is difficult to find people for what is called engineering sales.From all over the United States, professional instrumental musicians thatbegan to experience severe technical difficulties that defied their teachers as well asmore extended practice time came to see Chicago’s music guru, Carl Boardstadt.He was a nationally known consultant to classical and jazz professionals in the1920’s and 30’s. His particular specialty involved those who had “hit the wall,” thosewhose progress toward advanced musical mastery and accession into the higherechelons of the business had been truncated. His recommendations were ofteneccentric indeed. For the wind musician with breadth control problems, it might beblowing uniform bubbles through a long tube held at increasing depths of a filled37bathtub or feeling the seductively diaphragmatically oscillating belly of a taxi dancer.Pianists with speed problems worked at specially constructed up-side-downkeyboards with the rationale being that finger lifting was more rate limiting thanfinger placing. He said that his most hopeless cases were those whosepersonalities didn’t fit their choices of instrument, too often made by what positionremained open in the high school band rather than following a personal interview.He claimed that trombonists should be sensually languorous; clarinetists, nervouslyimpatient; double reed instrument players, obsessional and withdrawn; brassplayers, athletic and exhibitionistic.* * *As one of the team physicians of the San Diego Chargers in the years 1971-1975, I spent several days a week in their summer training camps, on the teamplane to and from games, in the locker room and on the sidelines during games. Iwas involved particularly in player drafts. Unbeknown to candidate players andother teams, we used a system of what social scientists call unobtrusive measuresof their personalities as part of their evaluations. College football players are sentquestionnaires each year by professional teams asking about a variety of life eventsand attitudes including their goals for the future. Filled out by hand, they served asrepeated measure, handwriting samples. Twenty years of them were available inthe Charger’s record room. Using 30 standard signs from the French graphologyliterature and three trained raters, we evaluated the hand writing characteristics ofplayers, National Football League wide, who obtained and retained playing, notreserve, positions in the League for at least three years.After studying handwriting profiles from close to a thousand established NFLplayers, and hundreds of hours of individual interviews of members of many teams,it became clear that, athletic abilities being equal, success was more likely when theplayer’s personality type fit his football position. What amounts to a series ofselective filters are operated by coaches, scouts and managers throughout theplaying careers of these players in grammar schools, high schools, universities and,38ultimately, the NFL draft. Choices obviously involved more than height, weight, timein the 40-yard dash and performance in motor coordination tasks. The playersbehavior, carefully studied on the field, in multiple camera angle game films, directand collateral interviews and observations under game conditions constituted a highlevel of selective pressure that brought with it the emergence of characteristicpersonality types. Tens to hundreds of thousands of candidates are winnowed downto several hundred highly paid players in this selective process.Distinctive personality patterns accompany success at a particular position.Structure loving, politically more conservative, choreographed in detail andrepeatedly rehearsed, offensive players keep their lockers more organized and tidy.More rebellious, resentful of structure, politically more libertarian, thematicallyinstructed but principally opportunistic, defensive players, particularly linemen andlinebacker’s lockers had messy lockers. Defensive team players were most often introuble with the law. Offensive lineman including centers, guards, tackles and sometight ends tend to be patiently enduring and tenacious, their aggression taking theform of stubbornness. This contrasts with the temperamental explosiveness of thedefensive line and linebackers. We could speak of the volubility of centers, the loyaland caring kindness of offensive tackles, the narcissistic exhibitionism of widereceivers, the murderous rage of the defensive end, the sullen and paranoiddepressiveness of the defensive back, the joyfully impulsive unpredictability ofbroken field running backs and the good citizenship egolessness of the blockingfullback. Some quarterbacks lead and play fearlessly in a religious state of grace,some are members of the Fellowship of Christian Athletes. Others lead asfearlessly, but in the style of an unconscionably calm psychopathic bank robbingprofessional.Influenced by our findings, the San Diego Chargers drafted the Hall of Famequarterback and one time ABC Monday Night Football commentator, Dan Fouts.Skinny and hurt several times during his college years as a quarterback in Oregon,he was passed over in the NFL draft until the third round. The scouts “knock” on himwas that they thought that he lacked psychological and physical toughness; theability to get up after a hit and to ignore the on coming tons of defensive linemen39while calmly and quickly surveying the routes of several potential receivers. Thepattern found in his handwriting features, however, resembled those JohnnieUnitas, the Hall of Fame quarterback of the Baltimore (then) Colts who, in spite ofhis small size, famously played with great courage and physical toughness. Inchronic and severe back pain, he played regularly until retirement in his early 40’s.Fouts drafted in the third round with a small five-figure bonus, proved to be a greatbargain for the Charger franchise.Given the theoretically infinite number of ways that a personality can be, it isremarkable that the latest Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the AmericanPsychiatric Association, DMS-IV, describes only eight types, which form threesubsets of exaggerated expressions of stable personality styles called personalitydisorders. All eight personality disorders can be grouped into: (1) Cluster A - Oddand eccentric types, whose anxiety is related to the felt threat of disintegration andannihilation of the self and whose style is dominated by mistrustful paranoia, aschizoid, detached and emotionally flat pattern or the isolated strange eccentricismof schizotypal characters; (2) Cluster B - Unstable and impulsive types whoseanxiety is related to loss of the stable self and whose style is dominated byirresponsible antisocial behavior, chronic instability with high amplitude fluctuationsin behavior called borderline, or patterns of excessive emotionality and dramaticdisplay associated with histrionic characters; and (3) Cluster C - Fearful typeswhose anxiety is related to hypersensitivity to criticism, guilt and feelings ofinadequacy or loss of control, and whose style is dominated by interpersonalavoidance, clinging dependency, or rigid lock up into obsessive-compulsive effortsto do the right thing and avoid disapproval. This remarkably small array ofstylistically consistent global behaviors selected from a practically infinite number ofimaginable possibilities establishes a small set of invariants of some, perhapsabstract, property. These characteristic patterns inspire our search for the impliedbrain and behavioral conservation laws that may underlie them.40Further Readings for Doesn’t EverybodyThe Evangelicals, David F. Wells and John D. Woodbridge, Abingdon Press,Nashville, 1975.Godtalk, Travels in Spiritual America, Brad Gooch, Knopf, N.Y. 2002The Value of Science, Essential Writings of Henri Poincare’ Stephen Jay Gould,Modern Library, Random House, N.Y. 2001From Being to Becoming, Ilya Prigogine, Freeman, San Francisco, 1980The Development of Mathematics, E.T. Bell, McGraw Hill, N.Y. 1945Deterministic Chaos, An Introduction, Heinz, George Schuster, VCH, Weinheim,1989Lectures on Dynamical Systems, Structural Stability and their Applications, Kotic K.Lee, World Scientific, Hongkong, 1992The Psychobiology of Behavioral Development, Ronald Gandelman, Oxford, N.Y.1992Handbook of Character Studies, Psychoanalytic Explorations, Manfred Kets deVries and Sidney Perzow, International Universities Press, Madison, 1991Cognitive Style, Five Approaches and Relevant Research, Kenneth M. Goldsteinand Sheldon Blackman, Wiley, N.Y. 197541CHAPTER 3:TRANSMOGRIFICATIONS OF ENERGIESAfter several of months of running, 12 miles most days, I felt an energeticallycalm, self-containment and a growing loss of interest in things sexual. Myincreasingly impoverished fantasy life led my training psychoanalyst to suggest thatI was running away from the critical, females issues of my psychoanalysis. He said Iwas becoming more out of reach as I became more socially pleasant. This wasdecades before Prozac, Paxil and other serotonin reuptake inhibitors were inducingsimilar hyposexual, withdrawn states of cordiality in millions of Americans. Recallthat Norman Geschwind, the Harvard Professor of Neurology, reported similarconditions of high energy sexual disinterest and abstract metaphysicalpreoccupation in patients with right temporal lobe epilepsy. For reasons other thanthe loss of church property rights and the spread of syphilis to the clergy, it felt like Iwas being readied for Pope Gregory VII’s Eleventh Century celibacy reforms forabbots and clerics of the Catholic Church.It was true that my feelings of dependence on my analyst for understandingand approval were being reduced as I ran into less emotional involvement. I wasbecoming a more rationally objective observer of others and myself. It wasn’t thefirst time that my over-ardent practice led to this warning. Baba Muktanada, myHindi guru, told me to reduce my daily sitting time of meditation. He said my spacey42social smile belied a growing disinterest in the welfare of others. I was gettinghooked on the hard training high of not really being there for other people.Several articles in Runner’s World said that many runners become addictedafter even a few months of running over six miles per day. It’s true that over fifteenyears I missed less than 10 days of running per year. I ran in driving rain, swelteringheat and dangerous places. In New York’s Central Park after dark, I followed afreshly strewn trail of torn woman’s garments that ended in shredded panties and abra on the Park’s bridle path. In Oklahoma City at 104,° I was chased and bitten bya terrier. In Munich at 4:30 AM, before delivering a morning lecture, the blackuniformed police stopped me for a shakedown. In Ann Arbor, I shuffled along in twofeet of snow. By the Seine, at 14°, paranoid barge hounds barked in big dogbaritones. I ran on the Hebrew University track a block away from a loud Palestinianbomb left in a refrigerator near a busy street corner. Breathless at nine thousandfeet in Aspen, gagging on the strong manure smell of Sacramento Valley farms, inthe hot wetness of Houston and dry heat of Palm Springs. I wore out three to fourpairs of Nike running shoes per year. What I did not tell my training analyst was thatthis felt like a chase after God. As in most spiritual transformations, His messagesand music could emerge quite suddenly.Even after stretching, it was painful to begin and that was my daily sacrifice. Iwas readying myself to follow the God of the Hebrews and make the “three daysjourney into the desert” as in Exodus and Paul’s recommended presentation of mybody “as a living sacrifice, holy and well pleasing to God.” After three miles ofrunning, the hip pain, back stiffness and leg heaviness lifted, difficult breathingbecame easier. A burst of new energy appeared suddenly. The first pop usuallytook the form of assertive feelings fueled by new personal power, an undoing of thelethargy and depression of a helpless sinner. New and big, I felt like I could fixalmost anything. Up bubbled an aggressive speech to the Dean about his refusal ofour recent request for an increase in departmental research space. As for theNational Institute of Health’s recent return of one of our grant proposals, it was nowclear that the reviewers were wrong. I would resubmit but this time ask for twice theamount of money. I rehearsed a new list of necessary and routine laboratory chores43for my most rebellious post-doctoral student. I would tell my teen-age son that hemust wait another year for his own car. I felt generally intolerant.In an article in Runners World, I labeled my run’s first global brain statetransition, the first second wind. It energized me with the cool firmness but ready-tobeangry righteousness of modern religious orthodoxy: Orthodox Jews gunningdown Hamas terrorists as retribution for bus bombing children which was itself aretribution; Muslim suicide bombing as vengeance for cultural contamination;Catholic Bishops refusing the Eucharist to pro-choice politicians; CharismaticChristians gay bashing defense of the sanctity of marriage; Mohammed’s early Sufilikepoetry of love turning into territorial aggression and Jew killing in his later years.Once in while, unpredictably, past the first hour of running and after the firstsecond wind, a fatigue easing second burst of energy followed the second stage ofexhaustion. I called this running-induced, second global brain state transition to asofter loving energy, the second second wind. Colors became intense, cloudsbreathed and my body lightened. Running once again became easy. I was floodedwith empathic and generous thoughts. I understood that the Dean was faced withtoo many space demands to satisfy; the grant reviewers’ criticisms of the budgetwere meant to be constructive. I recalled that strong minded, rebellious postdoctoralstudents often made the most creative contributions to science. I realizedthat my son’s urgent desire for his own car was a proposal in the direction of theindependence that would be required of him the following year when he was goingto be hundreds of miles away at a university. Filled with benign optimism, I felt thecompassionate perspective afforded those with energy but without envy, anger orfear. William James, in Varieties of Religious Experience, A.C. Underwood’s book,Conversion, Christian and Non-Christian and Gobi Krishna’s The Awakening of theKundalini, among many others before and since, describe the sudden appearanceof long lasting states of optimistic energy and loving empathy that can emerge afterlong episodes of suffering, especially following periods of privation of spiritualmeaning and the loss of a previously strong faith. These episodes are painfullychronicled by St. John of the Cross in his Dark Night of the Soul.44In the long distance running model of spiritual transformation, the first energyappears suddenly in the middle of painful fatigue and feels like a vigorousimplementation of Halachic commands or Canon Law. The second burst of energyemerges from readiness for resignation and ends in humane comprehension andempathy. In some Christian monastic practice, a similar transition is represented inthe ritual of Tenebrae (or Darkness). Fifteen lit, unbleached candles areextinguished, one by one over the night, while reading the Psalms. The practice issaid to represent the desertion of Christ by his disciples, as the church grows darkerover the night. After the singing of the Benedictus, the one remaining light isquenched, plunging the church into total darkness. In Myth and Ritual inChristianity, Alan Watts suggests that the loss of the last light of Tenebrae inducesthe realization that “I am nothing.” This reduction in egocentrism, along with a darkpiercingalertness is said to facilitate an invasion by a loving God that precipitatesthe fasting, sleep deprived and praying petitioners into long lasting ecstatic states.These uses of energy and its attendant characteristics are not physicallyspecifiable but rather hermeneutic of a force. It is both a potential and a realization,observed and inferred. It is the “energy stuff” of Freud’s libido, Wilhelm Reich’sorgone energy, Pavlov’s drive, Rudolph Steiner’s etheric formative force, thearousal and attention of brain wave and consciousness research, the Ch’I ofChinese medicine, the Hindu divine energy of Shakti, the Hebraic ruach, theCabalist’s Yesod, the Sufi’s Baraka, the Christian Holy Spirit, the Yogic breathenergy, prana, Mesmer’s animal magnetism, Galvani’s life force, Goethe’sGestaltung, Madam Blavatsky’s astral light, Georg Groddeck’s it, Henri Bergson’selan vitale, Schroedinger’s entropy, Abraham Maslow, Ruth Benedict andBuckminister Fuller’s synergy, Bertalanffy’s anamorphosis, Colin Wilson’s x factorand George De la Warr’s biomagnetism. Of course, by nationality, culture and fieldof study, there are many more examples, each locally defined by its particularcontext and haunting with its promise of universality.Energy in the context of mathematical physics is intuitional, abstract andrelational. It is not created or destroyed, but rather transformed. Consistent with hisdeceptively simple style of physical intuition training of the young, Feynman’s45discussion of thermodynamic energy and its conservation in Lectures in Physicsbegins with the premise that it is a numerical quantity that does not change whenone or many alterations in the system occurs. His heurism for energy and itsconservation involves the premise that Dennis the Menace has 28 indivisible blocks,a number which his parents find constant at the end of every day of play. If one daya count yielded 27, an investigation would reveal that a block could be foundelsewhere, say under the rug. If at the end of the day, the count was 29, the extraone had to come from somewhere else, perhaps Dennis’s playmate Bruce. IfDennis locked some of his blocks in the toy box and threw some into a bathtub ofdirty water and (1) A block weighed three ounces; (2) The box alone weighed 16ounces; and (3) Each block raised the water level of 6 inches by one fourth of aninch, then this metaphoric energy relation can be expressed:(blocks seen) + (weight of box)-16 ounces + (height of water)-six inches = constant (28)3 ounces 1/4 inchFeynman notes that this representation of an energy relation, computed as anumber of blocks, will always remain the same. If there were no blocks in sight, andone used this energy conservation relation with blocks as units of energy, we findno blocks as such in the expression at all.The abstract and formal idea of energy in physics first arose inmechanics and was generalized to electrostatics and electrodynamics. If oneidealizes these systems, eliminating real world factors such as friction, temperaturegradients, temperature dependence of the properties of materials, viscosity,hysteresis and other nonlinear behavior, then the energy conservation law says thatin an isolated and interacting set of systems, the sum of the energies of the severalsystems remains constant. If, on the other hand, a system interacts with itssurroundings, not isolated and interacting, then the increase in the energy of theindex system is equal to the work done on the system by its surrounds. Like pre-Enron bookkeeping of corporate cash flow and balancing ones personal checkingaccount, energy, like money, does not disappear; it is only changed in expression.As in the context of currency equivalent value, energy can represent a very generalquantity applicable to a wide array of specific objects and activities. The results of46the early studies by Professor Seymore Kety of Harvard and Dr. Harold Himwich ofthe Thudicum Laboratory in Galesberg, Illinois, using measures of whole brainoxygen and glucose utilization as indices of energy generation and utilization by thebrain, surprised many of us. They indicated that energy use by the whole brain wasrelatively constant when states of relaxed awakeness, mathematical cognition anddeep sleep were compared. Of course, modern studies have indicated that relativeregional brain energy utilization is state dependent and may vary quite widely.More spiritual aspects of energies and their transformations were madeclearer during several month visits to Baba Muktananda’s, now GurumayiChidvilasananda’s, Sidha Yoga Ashrams. Baba Muktananda loved and worshippedhis Hindu Guru, Bhagawan Nityananda. Baba had been a restlessly wandering,guru-hunting, young man. Nityananda said he had “wheels for feet.” After manyyears of devoted meditation, chanting and service, sadhanna, all the while beingprohibited from eating mangos, his favorite food, his passive, taciturn, ecstatic guru,Nityananda, presented voluble, energetic, joyful Baba with the guru’s ratheraromatic and worn sandals. This symbolically acknowledged Baba’s successfulabsorption of the guru’s transforming spiritual energy, shaktipat, the power of hisenlightenment.At Nityananda death, Baba, using world tours, spiritual fellowship meetings,satsangs (public conversations) and spiritual training sessions called “intensives”,organized Ashrams in West Coast sites such as Oakland and Venice, and on theEast Coast, in South Fallsburg, New York, buying several old residence hotels inthe Borscht Belt. Baba was introduced to America by one of his first advance men,Be Here Now Baba Ram Das, Timothy Leary’s co-investigator in the HarvardStudent LSD project when his name was Richard Alpert. EST’s Werner Erhard wasanother of Baba’s advance men.Baba discipled and disciplined a sister and brother who, when 18 and 11respectively, were sent to live in his Ashram in Ganeshpuri India by their parents.The girl was known as Malti when she served as a translator for Baba andGurumayi Chidvilasananda after receiving the energy of her enlightenment. Theyounger brother was given the name of Baba’s guru, Nityananda. When Baba took47a guru’s ecstatic death, Samadhi, both Gurumayi and young Nityananda becameco-gurus. Following three years of the usual covert power struggles of succession inorganizations, Gurumayi took over the guru lineage of Siddha Yoga. Her livelybrother’s worldly preoccupations with jazz drumming and confessions of promiscuityled to his giving up of the orange robe of the denunciate, sanyasi, for the blue robeof worldliness, exchanging one kind of energy for another.Brad Gooch who visited Gurumayi’s Ashram in Ganeshpuri, India, wrote inhis recent book, Godtalk, that she looks like a “synthesis of Indira Gandhi andBianca Jagger.” In what reads like a Hunter Thompson episode in an unwritten bookcalled Fear and Loathing Along the Guru Trail, Godtalk’s explication of Siddha Yogawas dominated by yellow journalistic rumors such as the one about Baba’s use of agynecologist’s table with stirrups for non-ejaculatory Tantric practice with somefemale followers. This unconfirmed claim remains, as Gooch says, in the realm of“…he said, she said.” Gooch’s exploration almost ignores the deeper meanings ofKashmir Shavism, Buddhism and Kundalini Yoga that compose the philosophicalfoundations of Siddha Yoga. The importance of knowing, loving and becoming onewith the God within trivializes all but ungenerous or hurtful interpersonal behavior.Even the tougher version of the Ten Commandments in Leviticus 19 would notnecessarily disagree.When a Los Angeles Times reporter tried to chide Baba about being drivenabout in his “worldly” Mercedes sedan, he explained that a very wealthy Indianmerchant had given it to him and “…I have to put my behind somewhere.” Similarly,why would Gooch’s account of Baba’s Tantric practice, even if true, ruin the imagoof him in my mind unless I had already surrendered to the pantheon of good andevil absolutes of Judeo-Christian taboo? My knowledge of these non-materialisticmeanings of apparent materialism began with one of the favorite finds of Baba’syouthful days of guru hunting: Zipruanna, who, wearing only a loincloth spent allday, every day, on a stool in the middle of a garbage dump. Remarkable changesoccurred in people who spent time there in his presence. Baba said the identity ofguru was established by the results experienced by those that spent time in hispresence. It could not be defined by the physical features or ritual conduct of the48interaction. People become spiritually energized and change in Zipruanna’s smelly,garbage-filled presence. I keep a picture of him on my desk.Gooch, in his implicitly and superficially righteous preoccupation with what heconsidered disenfranchising human vulnerability, recalls how the medieval churchused the difficult to impossible vow of chastity for political control of their priesthood.He seemed to have missed Baba’s lessons about the remarkably simple soundingpractices for mobilizing the energy of the God-receptive state. Once in this newstate, the rest of the metaphysical work almost takes care of itself. I, like manyothers, adopted Baba’s mantra, Om Namah Shivaya, “I worship the God within me(and you)” that he was given by his guru. The inner chant of this mantra brings meto an internal quiet in which things become clearer. Meditation, chanting and serviceto the guru was motivated by his promise that my egoistic concerns ranging fromthe number of publications on my curriculum vitae, to the size and adroitness of mypenis, would disappear autonomously in the Baba state of bliss. This sounds verymuch like the role of the transition to an “active intellect.” in Abraham Abulafia’s 13 thCentury Commentary on the Secrets. Arduous study of the spiritually dense writingsof Sri Aurobindo during the days with Professor Spiegelberg at Stanford gave me apeak into the simple but difficult to execute idea of “simply” becoming thetranscendently comprehending state of existence-consciousness-bliss.Whereas Baba would occasionally lapse into terse Sanskrit verse and itsmultiplicity of potential meanings, Gurumayi keeps things simple. Sitting silently andimmobile at satsang for hours, she radiates transformational energy, shakti, thatmakes ruminations about human affairs seem unimportant. The work is aboutgetting the self concerned head noise of ones preoccupations sufficiently out of theway to allow the discovery of the God who has been waiting patiently within. Afellow ashramite gave me a photograph of my first audience with Gurymayi. Itshowed me on my knees in front of her. She appears to be dismissing me with abaleful, almost disdainful look as my introducer, gesturing broadly, was, unasked,reciting a list of my professional bona fides. The picture caught her waving me offwith a long, peacock-feathered stick. Obviously unimpressed, she is sending meback to my all night, every night, tent cleaning labors at the Ashram. Rich Indian49businessmen, whose large donations were a major source of support of theAshrams, faired little better. They seldom received a personal audience or favorableseating at Darshan, the evening public time of question and answers with the guru.In contrast with the relatively easy public availability, mischievous play, provocativehumor and worldly sophistication of Baba, the ambience of Gurumayi is moreprivate, simple, serious and subtle. It is as powerful, but in another way.In response to Gurumayi’s ascension to Siddha Yoga’s singular guru, Iimagined hearing Baba saying that God energy was at least androgynous, if thedimension of sexual identity was relevant at all. Baba taught that divine energy, bynecessity, is expressed through a wide variety of particular personalities andcultures and should not be confused with the details of its manifestations. Thisincluded the sexual identity of the chosen Vehicle. Guramayi’s central theme, as Iunderstand it, concerns the simple, quiet and pervasive powers of love and faith.Some say Baba took the path, marga, of selfless action, karma-marga, whereasGurumayi took the bhakti-marga, the road of loving devotion and faith. The thirdmarga is jnana-marga, my inclination, is the road of intellectual study andknowledge. Aldous Huxley related the choice among these three categories of yogapractice, to the physical and personality types of William Sheldon’s 1954 Atlas ofMan. Karma yoga corresponded to the mesomorphic body type and the assertiveboldness, high energy, and interpersonal callousness of the somatotonicpersonality. Bhakti Yoga was the characteristic choice of endomorphic body typeswith the viscerotonic personality traits of sociability, good will, tolerance and love.Huxley associated Jnana Yoga with ectomorphic body type and the cerebrotoniccharacteristic of shyness, sensitivity and intellectuality.My summers with Baba at his temporary Ashram in Venice, California andthe permanent American Ashram in South Fallsburg, New York, were spent in daily,very early morning, chanting of the gurugita after most of the night spent takingdown, cleaning and putting up large tarpaulin meeting tents. I was assigned thissimple, arduously manual, all night work after being interviewed and found out to bea professor and chairperson of a medical school department. Baba instructed hisassignment committee that many if not all professorial egos would benefit from what50Andrew Carnegie famously called the dignity of real work. Spicy one dish vegetarianmeals, twice a day meditation and brief stolen naps consumed the rest of the day. Ifound myself meditating for longer and longer times, chasing the promised BluePearl that Baba said appeared behind the eyes near the supreme meditative endpoint.Beside care with the titration of meditation-induced interpersonaldisconnection, detachment with love is the desired end point of most Hindu andBuddhist meditative practice, another set of “side effects” of the energy arising earlyin the course of too much meditation is called kriyas, spontaneous episodes ofinvoluntary behaviors and postures of the body such as unprovoked chanting andwrithing and stereotyped hand positions called mudras. Baba told us one of hiskriyas took the form of spontaneous erections that occurred during his firstexperiences with deep meditative states. I recall a woman physician and fellowashramite in Los Angeles telling me that her panties often got so soaked duringmeditation that she worried about being stuck to her cushion. Beyond these initialsomatic overflows of Divine Energy, shakti, emerges a vision of the Blue Pearl,bindu, Baba’s “gift from the Goddess Kundalini.” As he entered this stage, he saidthat his mind filled with “joyous contentment.” Jewish mysticism of the 1300’sacknowledged the neighborhood relations of Eros and the Sacred.More formal and scientific uses of the word, energy, like all objects of thoughtembeddable in a mathematical context, are abstract and relational. In his book,Mathematics-The Music of Reason, Jean Dieudonne′ treats mathematical objectsas objects of thought. Dieudonne′’s book documents the 19 th Century transitionfrom concrete, visualizable, classical mathematics to abstract, nonvisualizablerelational ideas. This conceptual transition to abstract, relational thought objects thatare no longer representable by pictures or accessible to our senses of mathematicsand physics is yet to reach the concrete DNA-causal religionists of modernmolecular biology. In 20 th Century mathematics, Dieudonne′ observes that “…theprimary role in theory is played by the relations between mathematical objectsconcerned rather than the nature of the objects themselves…these relations areoften the same for objects which appear to be very different and therefore they must51be expressed in ways which do not take these appearances into account…and canbe specialized at will…” DNA sequences are, as MIT molecular biologist, EricLander observed, nothing more than an elementary “…list of parts…” In fact, sinceabout 1% of the nucleotides are relevant to functional genes, one might say that theimportant members of this list of parts are distributed very thinly among many moreapparently unimportant ones. The next frontier will certainly involve anunderstanding of the dynamics of the interactions among elemental parts and inmore abstract laws about molecular biological relations; a focus on the dynamics,not the structural parts, that regulate and control their expression.* * *I made a pilgrimage to spend eighteen months within Rene’ Thom’spenumbra, living among mathematicians in his “ashram” in Bures sur Y’vette,France. Thom was one of the founders of the Institute des Hautes D’Etudes, IHES,Institute for Advanced Scientific Studies, created to stanch the flow of high-levelscientific talent away from France after the Second World War. It is in Bures surY’vette, deep in a green forested valley, 50 or so miles South of Paris, in a buildingpacked with small, thin walled, big windows-on-the-woods offices. Each officecontained a single hard chair, an old office desk, two walls of blackboards and a boxof white only chalk. The use of colored chalk was felt to be without mathematicalrigor because its use substitutes colors as dimensional descriptors for moredemanding abstract and formal representations. Color was cheating. Meditation inthis ashram was practiced by staring, pacing, scribbling, and humming, mumbling,belching and farting through the Institute’s thin office walls. The building, thoughalmost completely occupied, was otherwise silent. The Institute was populated bysuch world-class mathematicians and theoretical physicists that once inside thatbuilding, I felt so intimidated that I almost never spoke above a whisper. Listening toexcellent William Thurston’s casual use of a tiled bathroom floor to motivate aunique partition of a topological space, I was attacked by the awe of an earlymorning visit to an almost empty Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris or standing in frontof Michelangelo’s radiant marble statue of Mary and Jesus the Infant in the Vatican.52Though the environment was one of tranquil academic scholarship, I lived chargedwith anticipated performance anxiety about the seminars on the brain as adynamical system I was scheduled to present to these (I feared) ready-to-bedisdainful,prize-winning, pure mathematicians and theoretical physicists.My dorm-style sleeping room at IHES was, in winter, painfully cold anddrafty; the narrow iron bed’s thin mattress contained lumps of persistently disturbingdreams, the small scratched table for work shim-irreparably wobbled. A fadedposter of Van Gogh’s garden was tacked crookedly on the door facing the toilet inthe dank, dimly lit small bathroom. A dwelling for distracted young mathematicians.A retired but still famous Parisian chef cooked many course, elegant meals everyafternoon. The food was accompanied by so many liters of unlabeled red wine andpeer pressure to be French and socially drink it that it became a choice betweendulled, blunted,. sleepy post-prandial afternoons or living on bread, many cheeses,apples and Perrier water, alone in my room. I chose the latter.Thom’s gifts to us theoretically oriented non-mathematicians werediagrammatic, easy-to-visualize pictures that allow the intuitive capture of counterintuitivediscontinuities in functions. How we might imagine that a smooth andcontinuous change in a cause of something can lead to a big, discontinuous changein the results. His system of topological (shape not size) diagrams was useful whenconsidering up to four causal variables and one to two dependent variables thatdescribed how things behaved.For an important real life example, in modern clinical pharmacology, thesmooth dose-response curve consistent with the physician’s intuition that if a littledrug didn’t work, a little more may do so, should become an up and down search forthe dose-region for the desired effect which may involve a lower amount than apreviously ineffective drug dose. The therapeutic effect may occur in the middle of anarrow dose range with too much or no effect occurring out of this span. In manyphysical systems, sudden and global transitions in state, from incoherent light raysto coherent lasing and from laminar flow of fluids to turbulence, emergeunexpectedly when causal parameter are moved into what some call the criticalregion of the values of control parameters. Outside this region, cause and result53were behaving linearly and smoothly whereas within this region we observe globaland dramatic changes via a forced discontinuity in what Thom called a catastropheand others use related words such as bifurcation or phase transition. The transitionsfrom painful fatigue to running rage and then to ecstatic transcendence feels like thegifts from two kinds of Gods, the first, bearing the righteous lawfulness of the OldTestament, the second bringing the empathic forgiveness of the New TestamentJesus. Catastrophe and bifurcation theories predict and keep track of thesetransitions using mathematically describable changes in global characteristics of the“motion” using technical descriptors such as eigenvalues, germs and jets.Thom taught me my first catastrophe, called the cusp, in words during ourlate afternoon walks along a shadowed green wooded path on the grounds of theInstitute des Hautes Etudes, outside of Paris. My homework consisted of trying tovisualize his verbal descriptions. It was not until weeks later that he drew thegeometric object being discussed on the blackboard. With eyes twinkling and in hisprovocatively playful style, he said,“Imagine an empty rectangular box with the front edge of its roof buckledinto an `S’ and the back edge, an unfolded, left-to-right gradually rising simplesmooth curve. If one moves the causal force from low to high, from left to right alongthe back of the box, the changing effect (represented by height) would be smooth;moving from left to right in the front encounters a sudden drop off at the S shapedbuckling, a discontinuity in roof height indicating a discontinuity in effect. The energyequivalent height of the roof graphically indicates the amount of result. The roof isthe manifold upon which the result of causal change is portrayed. The twodimensional floor of the box represents a graph of the two causal parameters, theincreasing amount of normal factor going left to right along the `x’ dimension, theincreasing amount of splitting factor (taking one from the back to the front to theregion of the buckling) going back to front along the `y’ dimension.”He gave me some examples of systems that showed cataclysmic changes ineffect from smooth changes of normal and splitting factors. About the onset of awar: “At the back of the top surface of the box, the manifold, the normal factorincreasing from left to right is the amount of the perceived threat. The splitting factor54decreasing from front to back is the cost (and ability to pay) for war. Without thefinancial capacity to make war, threat goes from left to right smoothly at the back ofthe box as tension gradually increases without the onset of armed conflict. Wheneffective fighting capacity is cheap and/or already well funded, the country wellarmed, the increases in threat go from left to right at the front edge of the box andencounter the cliff of catastrophe and war is declared. Cost of, or ability to wage warvaries from the front to back, and serves as the splitting factor. Considering prisonriots, social tension is the normal factor and alienation (degree of identification withprison authority) is the splitting factor.” Using factial expressions of dogs sketchedby the Konrad Lorenz, Christopher Zeeman then of Warwick Mathematics Institutein England, considered countenances reflecting increasing rage as the normalfactor, the amount of fear was the splitting factor. Increasing rage at high fearincreased smoothly at the back of the box; at low fear, increasing rage falls off thecliff to an animal attack at the front of the box.” He paced as he talked, occasionallylooking up to see if I was following him. He continued,“A light above the box casts a shadow from the roof to the floor, outlining thegradually widening fold created by the transition from the smoothly rising back of theroof to its `S-shaped’ front. This triangle on the x-y causal floor is the region in whichthe discontinuity in the result surface roof results and is called the bifurcation set. Anincreasing amount of the causal `normal factor’ is represented from left to rightalong the `x’ dimension, the results of which change smoothly at the back of the roofbut encounter a discontinuous jump up or fall down crossing the inaccessiblecrevice in the `S’ fold at the front of the roof. Again, the triangular shadow on thefloor made by the fold indicates the parameter region in which discontinuouschanges in the result surface occur. The reason the parameter that determines thefront to back location of the left to right movement of the `normal factor’ is called the`splitting factor’ becomes obvious. Its value determines whether the results inducedby increasing amounts of `normal factor’ will be smoothly changing or generate adiscontinuous jump. The entire visualizable object is called a cusp catastrophe andit along with higher dimensional parameter region-inspired shapes such as the55swallowtail and butterfly buy back the smooth DE deterministic intuition lost withdiscontinuous changes in results.”He grinned mischievously as he asked, “Can you see it?”Thom’s catastrophes serve as accessible and powerful theoretical settingsfor the use of energy as a generalizable, one dimensional, dependent, resultingeffect, influenced by one or several, sometimes conflicting, independent, causal,variables. For more examples: the weight of a ship (smaller to greater, left to right,along the x, normal dimension) and the position of center of gravity (smaller togreater, front to back, along the y splitting dimension) are causal with a jump in roofheightenergy from stability to capsizing, a discontinuity emerging from initiallysmooth changes in stability. As above, gradually increasing tension (the left to rightnormal factor) and alienation (the back to front (splitting factor) in inmates generatea sudden increment in energy, from subtlety increasing tension in relative quiet tothe sudden outbreak in a riot in the prison population. Embryological notochordsomitogenesis, (that which become the vertebrate of the spinal column) has asmooth (left to right) causal influence that Chris Zeeman named a normal factor. Itis the smooth growth of the material wave of mesodermal (to become muscle,connective tissue and bone) tissue. Zeeman called the front to back dimensionalgradient of influence, the secondary wave of adhesiveness, the splitting factor. Thevalue of this secondary wave co-determined a critical-valued interaction betweenthese causal parameters leading to a discontinuous change in the “energy”equivalent continuity of developmental growth and vertebral column segmentation.A little more technically: Thom’s basic mathematical contributions were indifferential topology and analysis with particular emphasis on what is calledstructural stability of surfaces representing and supporting actions called manifolds.For example, in a graph of a function, say F(x), such that a change in cause xdetermines what happens to the result y= F(x), the stability question involves whathappens when one perturbs F(x) with a littleδ, i.e. δ + F(x). Do the topologicalproperties of the surface representing the potential range of actions of the system(such as nearness of an originally close point set, continuity and connectedness ofthe surface, its dimensionality, its compactness as a generalization of finiteness)56remain the same after perturbation? Note that the inter-data point metric distancesare not considered. If they do, the two dynamical objects being compared aretopologically equivalent. The test of this equivalence requires the mapping one setonto the other with, at most, smooth distortions of either or both surfaces.In the context of catastrophe-related bifurcation theory, if a δ converts asteady valued fixed point to an oscillating cycle on a manifold of potential actions,also called a state space, then the fixed point system was not structurally stable. Inphase space, this is seen as a change-in-causal-parameter induced transformationof a dot to a circle. If the one frequency circle is perturbed to a manifold of thesystem’s actions consisting of two independent frequencies, the circle takes thetopological form of the crust of a doughnut, one frequency graphed spiral windingaround the doughnut, the other winding along the doughnut around its orifice, thecircle is not structurally stable. If δ distorts the frequency-amplitude relations on asurface such that the manifold of possible actions is distorted from a doughnut to atea cup, both topological manifolds being one holed surfaces and thereforetopologically equivalent, the system is structurally stable. Perturbed systems thatmaintain the sequence of points in time in sequential order (though the distancesbetween the points may be different), are generally structurally stable.The seductive possibility, one which Thom realized so successfully, wasthat in the language of distance-independent differential topological forms, therewould exist a small, finite set of shapes categorically describing the causes andresult parameter spaces from which, even without specific quantities, universalqualitative (including discontinuous) behavior could be described and sometimespredicted. A formal yet general categorical system within which a small set ofuniversal discontinuous changes in global qualities could be rationalized seemedseductively applicable to the enlightenment transitions, spiritual transformations,appearing suddenly after months and years of disciplined spiritual practice. ThePlatonic view is that the universal forms of discontinuous change existed beforethey could be about anything specific, before the universe was born.In this era of nonlinear dynamics and dynamical system, common dynamicalscenarios give accounts of smooth changes in causes leading to discontinuous57changes in results. The Nobel Prize winning solid-state physicist, Phillip Anderson,in a short but memorable piece in Science in the 1970’s said it tersely, “More isdifferent.” This general, qualitative mathematical theory of discontinuous changemodels nicely the sudden delivery of the first and second second winds fromgradually and continuously increasing running distances as well as the abrupttransmission of the guru’s “energy”, shaktipat, from smoothly increasing amounts ofchanting, meditation, guru service and Baba love. Gradually changing forcesleading to sudden changes in an energy-equivalent result are found in mostrigorous form in Rene′ Thom’s singularity-bifurcation-catastrophe theory applied torational mechanics and geometric optics. Here the existence of already solvablecomputational formalisms makes this more qualitative approach superfluous. On theother hand, the power of this both basic and applied mathematical orientation andmethod lies in its approach to the qualitative understanding of variously inducedglobal and sudden changes in an energy-equivalent observable in biological,psychological, spiritual and social systems, fields of study in which little abstract andformal lawfulness presently exists. Oxford’s Chris Zeeman’s more accessibleapplications of Thom’s deeper, more generally ramifying, almost mystical (due totheir apparent wide generality) results, include approaches to real world problemssuch those above as well as the sudden change in excitable membrane potentialaccompanying the generation of the heart beat and neuronal discharge;mechanisms of opinion change, stock market crashes and, as noted above, thesocial science of riots. Whereas Thom’s On Structural Stability and Morphogenesiscan be said to be scriptural, Zeeman’s Selected Papers, 1972-1977 constitute theBook of Common Prayer of this church.To review and place catastrophe and bifurcation theories in the context of thedifferential equations of mathematical physics and biology, causal determinismimplied by differential equations conventionally requires continuity and smoothnessin behavior to be credible. Our intuitions as well as the formal conditions for thegeneric differential equations of mathematics and physics imply that smoothlyincreasing amounts of cause lead to smoothly increasing results and yield at leastlocal predictability: a little more leads to a little more, a little less leads to a little less.58This smoothness-dependent intuition of determinism breaks down in nonlinearequations as well as in a wide variety of the machines of experimental physics, fromthe sudden coherent lasing of previously incoherent light to the vortices andturbulence in suitably bounded rotating or flowing fluid. It took me a while for thesetopological still shots and movies of the head to become real. Nevertheless, theenrichment of intuition was well worth it. Of course one could smoothly increase thenormal factor weight of a ship until it gradually sank, but if one moved the center ofgravity splitting factor to an eccentric position in the ship in the parameter region ofthe bifurcation set, a sudden global capsize before weight-induced gradual sinkingmade sense. I could see it. Indeed, increasing normal factor tension in a prisonpopulation that was identified, not alienated, from the officials and mores of thepenal institution, would increase social symptomotology gradually. However,increasing the splitting factor of social and institutional alienation results in thecataclysmic change of a riot with increasing tension. I could see it.Do we need to know the causal equations to anticipate instability anddiscontinuity in our lives? Zeeman making Thom’s thoughts accessible to us plainmortals said no. He suggested that we could use several diagnosticphenomenological signs to make a good guess about whether we are near or withinthe bifurcation set. Depending upon the route that the causal variables take throughthe shadow of the bifurcation set, we may see very large fluctuations in ourobservable. The Dow or S&P stock indices in the neighborhood of a sudden largechange is often presaged, sometimes for weeks, by a marked increase in volatility,fluctuations between extreme values. Theorists call the statistical properties of atime series of values behaving this way anomalous variance. For several months, Idid psychotherapy with a genuinely spiritual Catholic priest who only some Sundaysserved the Eucharist, the corporal presence of our Lord at Communion, wearing notrousers or underpants beneath his robes. A sudden change in a stock index inresponse to the “shock” of a terrorist attack takes much longer to settle down if acataclysmically bigger change is in the neighborhood. This extension of thesystem’s usual relaxation time is sometimes called critical slowing. In the bifurcation59regime of a schizophrenic break down, critical slowing can be both global and literalas the patient freezes in catatonic postures.In the neighborhood of the bifurcation set, big jumps in the stock index, up ordown, are possible under almost the same surrounding conditions. This stockanalyst-humbling phenomenon is called bimodality. Jimmy Swaggert’s Saturdayswere often spent watching the show at naked dance parlors and buying videos atthe pornography shops of Metairie Highway near Schwegmann’s Grocery outsideNew Orleans. Sundays found him on national television engaged with infectiouslyreal, transcendent experiences in the public arena of the pulpit. The ecstaticcongregation was deeply moved by his eloquent and tearful sermons about sin andsalvation. Counter to most suspicions, this is less conscious fakery than thegenuinely felt alternating states intrinsic to the bimodality in neighborhoods ofspiritually unstable, born again transitions.Similarly, beginning with nearly the same initial values near the boundary ofthe bifurcation set, very similar motions lead to dramatically different results. Thiscounter-intuitive behavior has been called divergence. At UCLA’s NeuropsychiatricInstitute, I interviewed a pair of lively teenage, genetically identical male twins raisedby a loving family in Los Angeles’s Valley. One was president of his high schoolclass, a Sunday school nursery school volunteer and a Saturday soup server to thepoor. The other twin sold pot and cocaine to support his habit. Deep and potentiallydark mysteries live in these spiritual bifurcation sets. They leave us pondering childsexual abuse by deeply religious clergy and the massacre by mass suicide of aNew Christian congregation by James Jones. We wonder why it is thatfundamentalists (Jewish, Christian and Muslim) have the most ecstatic and directvalidating experiences of God and do the most shooting and bombing of otherpeople. In Burt Lancaster’s portrayal of bifurcation set dweller, Elmer Gantry,charismatic believer and exploitative psychopath, were simultaneous and bothcredibly real.Another feature of the occupancy of this bifurcation region in control space isthat the values producing a sudden jump that occur passing through going one wayalong the “normal” dimension usually jump back much further along when moving60the other way. Theorists call this characteristic sign of bifurcation land, hysteresis. Itis generally known that sudden healing changes of the first born again experiencecan arrive magically fast whereas a run at it a second time, another born again stateafter the loss of the first one, comes, if at all, with much more effort and difficulty.Members of Alcoholic’s Anonymous know that getting on the AA wagon the firsttime may be quick, joyful and easy. Getting back on this wagon after a fall is muchmore painfully slow and demanding, analogous to the Carmalite monk; St. John’slost faith engendered suffering of the Dark Night of the Soul.Viewing the instabilities and extremes near the boundary of a bifurcationbrings inquiries and advice about why a rational compromise, some form ofdisciplined moderation, would not be more desirable. It turns out that in thisparameter regime, the in-between state is intrinsically inaccessible. The pocket inthe S shaped fold of the upper manifold cannot be attained, at least for very long, byvarying the values of the two parameters. However, if one increases the number ofcontrols, it might be possible to stabilize a small island in a parametric sea ofinstabilities. In an application of this strategy, Smith College and Harvard ProfessorsJames Callahan and Jerome Sashin used a geometric representation of the difficultto stabilize region of normal weight on a double cusp manifold representing thebehaviors of patients with eating disorders with both anorexia nervosa and bulimia.They varied five controls to stabilize a very small result area representing normaleating by varying the control values for ability to verbalize feelings, to imaginesolutions, to defend against anxiety with unconscious forgetting called repression, tomake contact with realistic rationality and to modulate feelings with say exercise,meditative practice or psychopharmaceuticals.My experiences with the so-called borderline personality, with the tendencytoward sudden and global personality change, from Sunday school teacher to Harlotin the space of a breath, has been both sexually exciting and personally ruinous forme in my life. I could feel the instabilities in these dwellers of the bifurcation pocketsand my heart raced at the promise of mutually unconsidered impulses, the blurringof orificial identities, the experiments with sexual roles and modes and theincipiency of collapse into regressive mud play. Most of all, I anticipated that their61screaming orgasms, potentiated by a natural inclination to bifurcate, would be somessianic as to carry me along to a transcendentally erotic new place.Unfortunately, paranoid rages, bursts of promiscuity and hopeless inconsistency ofgoals and efforts dominated the remainder of our living days.Further Readings for TRANSMOGRIFICATIONS OF ENERGIESReligions in Four Dimensions; Existential, Aesthetic, Historical, Comparative, WalterKaufman, Reader’s Digest Press, 1976Religious and Spiritual Groups in Modern America, Robert S. Ellwood, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1973.The Evangelicals, What They Believe, Who They Are, Where They are Changing,David F. Wells and John D. Woodbridge, Abington Press, Nashville, 1975A Nation of Believers, Martin Marty, Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago, 1976Conversion: Christian and Non-Christian, Alfred C. Underwood, George Allen,Unwin Ltd., London, 1925Eros and the Sacred, Paul Avis, SPCK, London, 1989Mukteshwari, The Way of Muktananda, SYDA Foundation, Ganeshpuri, India, 1972Godtalk, Travels in Spiritual America, Brad Gooch, Knopf, N.Y. 2002The Beat of a Different Drum; The Life and Science of Richard Feynman, JadishMehra, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 199462The Shape of Space, Jeffrey Weeks, Dekker, NY, 1985The Topological Picture Book, George K. Francis, Springer-Verlag, NY 1988Mathematical Models of Morphogenesis, Rene Thom, Wiley, NY 1983Catastrophe Theory, Selected Papers, 1972-1977, Christopher Zeeman, Addison-Wesley Reading, MA 197763CHAPTER 4:SENSUAL IN-BETWEEN ENTROPIESSince the early teens, I’ve been beguiled by girls and women that have whatmight be regarded as exquisite sensibility, perhaps more precisely, exquisite selfsensibility. These inhabitants of the near transformational neighborhoods ofbifurcation sets, are grandly responsive receivers of emotionally significantinformation arising from their insides and the world. They are the canaries in thedeep mines of human experience. Not the usual one lively-eye, one sober-eye,binocular difference of most of us, both their eyes sparkle, their feeling antennaeawait a happening and each is regarded as new. I spot these brains in a crowdwithin minutes and am compulsively drawn to know them better, to become part ofthem, to vicariously experience and serve them. They seem to have little inhibitorycontrol of even weak sensory information on its way to their strong, global feelings.Near ecstasy and excruciating pain await. They feel their anticipations with theirbody, down to their painted toes. Their receptivity brings me lower abdominalwarmth in remembrance.At sixteen in my Dad-purchased second hand Ford convertible, I was parkedwith my new girl friend on Sarasota’s Lido Beach, hearing and seeing dark shadowsof the Gulf of Mexico’s waves hit white sand against the night sky. I took her flatparty shoes off to message her feet. When I kissed her left foot and sucked gentlyon her toes, she gasped and became faint. She told me that a strong electric shock64had run up her back. The passionate licking and sucking of her musky, moist, pinklabial lips brought what she said were explosions of pink and blue lights. She hadseveral ecstatic multicolored crises in a row, sometimes without pause. She beggedme to stop. I was as pleased as a sexually inexperienced young man in love couldhave possibly been.Bowled over by what seemed to be the uniquely sensual properties of herbrain, I began to wonder if her sensitivity was more general when she asked me tokeep the windows open or top down, even in the cool of a Florida January, becausethe exhaust smell in my car was suffocating, though I couldn’t smell it. The car hadbeen checked and registered negative for abnormal fumes and leaks by AndersonFord. She asked me never to wear any kind of after-shave lotion because it chokedher. Jazz music on the car radio had to be played quietly. On-coming headlightsgave her headaches. Her mother, sometimes desperate, called me for help duringher daughter’s episodes of premenstrual emotionality and early menstrualdiscomfort. During these times, we would drive together for hours as she explainedthe many different colors of lower abdominal pain and how this particular kindyawned darkly before it cramped. It was more purple then any of the others. I triedto explain what I intuited but didn’t understand to her mother about the her gift ofunfiltered information coming through her nerve endings, her ever readiness forsurprise and her brain’s unwillingness or inability dampen or ignore what it didn’tlike. She saw things in art, heard things in music that I only saw, and heard after hertelling. She had tearful smiles listening to Debussy’s Afternoon of a Fawn. Theflatted fifths of Charley Parker and the laconic riffs of Miles Davis made her anxious.Since then and for all these many years, the same sensually susceptiblebrains showed up in my life carrying a variety of woman’s names and I never lostmy fascination for them. I learned that their heightened awareness extended to thespiritual realm with unusually strong metaphysical inclinations and readiness fortranscendent experience. They seemed to live closer to the direct experience ofGod. Attending Assembly of God and other Pentecostal midweek service, I foundthat praying in tongues and dying in the Lord came as easily and dramatically tothem as their orgasmic experiences. At the same time, distant bad news could65suddenly become immediate and loud in a litany of threatening thoughts thathooked and persisted through sleepless nights. They taught me to see genuinelythe delicate beauty of flowers and to know in my stomach that some forms ofsadness felt hollow like homesickness. In medical school I found that that many ofthem were the clinic patients, women and men, with unusual sensitivity to chemicalodors, think Gulf War Syndrome, and fibromyalgia, which I heard as unusuallysensitive awareness of normal sensory information about posture and positioncoming in from the bones and muscles of the body but experienced as pain. Thisbackground of odorific and somatic information is usually repressed fromconsciousness by the rest of us. Their medical histories contained detailed accountsabout how each of their organs was feeling at the time, sensations that thetextbooks say we are incapable of consciously knowing. Internists and psychiatristsoften dismissed their accounts as signs of somatoform disorder, psychologicalconflicts expressed in the language of body feelings.In the psychophysiological laboratory, I learned these brains tended not tohabituate. Each of a series of noises continued to elicit startle responses that couldbe picked up in brain wave recordings or in the running record of apsychophysiological, lie detector, machine. In psychoanalytic training, I learned thatthese brains remembered their dreams more richly than the rest of us and thattreatment with over twice a week analytic sessions was potentially dangerous. Thepsychoanalytical situation-engendered fantasies and feelings could get too strongand exaggerated, too real.Professor Iris Bell of University of Arizona’s Alternative Medicine ResearchProgram has, studying these brains, found slower reaction times, defects in dividedattention psychological tasks, longer latencies to the first dream, and unusualpatterns of odor reception called cacosmia or dysosmia. Using brain wave andcardiac interbeat interval data as markers, Bell reports the increase in the amount ofalpha awake brain waves and decreases in cardiac interbeat interval variationassociated with increasing sensitivity, rather than habituation, with repeatedexposure to a variety of smells over time.In spite of these brains usually requiring what is known as high maintenance66in relationships, I continue to be erotically spellbound, in love with them in all theirforms. Questions about how to think about these exquisitely sensitive women, Bell’sSyndrome exists but is rarer in men, continue to drive aspects of my scientificresearch. It has been variegated quest, which began with trying to find a generalconceptual framework that would help my understanding of this unique capacity tobe aware and process large amounts of internal and external information thatescape the awareness of most of us. As one might guess, this search led tofundamental ideas about information and its inverse, the entropy indicating theamount of information transport capacity, with respect to their characterization,quantification and measurement.To get to the end from close to the beginning, we recall that it was ClaudeShannon and his followers who both mathematically proved and experimentallyverified that a receiver must have more entropy, less already fixed knowledge andmore wondering, than the sending source, in order for the message to be sensitivelyand reliably received and encoded. Sensibility seems to have something to do withthe readiness for information transmission afforded by the brain’s high entropy,minimal fixed information states, in its resting dynamics. Their remarkablereceptivity derives from a baseline brain state like the formless emptiness of thebodhisattva’s “…no form, no sound, no feelings, no perceptions, noconsciousness…” of transcendent Tibetan Buddhism as described in the HeartSutra of The Dalai Lama.In Chinese Medicine, xu, meaning emptiness, contrasts with shi, the word forfullness, both of these complementary opposites having multiple specific meanings.Most metaphysically relevant is the characterization of xu as the emptiness of thedeepest reality of being and the highest state of human spirituality. Like that aspectof Lao-Tsu’s ineffable Dao, The Way that is empty, xu indicates a mind devoid ofdesire, being lucid and serene. In the context of dynamical form, xu shares thestructureless, non-imagery of maximal entropy systems and shi the lower dynamicalentropy of fixations on form, desires and beliefs. Shigehisa Kuriyama’s TheExpressiveness of the Body, elucidating historical and conceptual divergences ofGreek and Chinese Medicine, notes that xu was the supreme end of self-cultivation67and the secret to vigor and longevity. “…to achieve fullness of life one had to abidein empty nothingness, xuwu.” In Lao-Tsu’s Tao-Te-Ching, “…the Way is gained bydaily loss, loss upon loss until…by letting go, it all gets done…”William James, in The Principles of Psychology, tried to capture the subjectivedynamics of the brain as an on-going preconscious stream of statistical waveprocesses. He envisioned autonomously increasing and decreasing coherenceemerging spontaneously and from sensorial evoked thoughts via the confluenceand disaggregation of statistical wave processes, “…wave crests and hollows…”that achieved temporary statistical stability by “…feelings of relation, consubstantialwith our feelings or thoughts of the terms between which they (only temporarily)obtain.” In the more receptive, higher entropy brain systems, fleeting forms changewithout continuity, jumping from one to another with “magical rapidity,” but being notalready engaged, are available for use for self-organized structure evoked by newinformation. Without ordered, low entropy, preconceived ideational defects in theresting random brain field, the full attentional statistical machine is available tosensitively respond in self-organized, quasi-stable states of cognitive, conative andaffective integration. They then disappear; this brain relaxes quickly, ready for newexperience. This contrasts with those brains that are dominated by islands of ordercomposed of personality fixations and rigid belief systems, low entropy defects,which interfere with sensorially responsive self-organization.68As in most systems of authoritarian premises, precise definitions and whatappears to be strict logical continuity, as in discussions of Torah among OrthodoxJews and Canon Law by Catholic bishops, classical equilibrium thermodynamicideas that are borrowed for use out of the context of their origins, risk the calumnyof their physicist practitioners. We have probably already earned more than a littledistain from those quarters with our use of none-minimal or none-maximal but inbetweenentropies. This phrase cannot be found in the literature of physics or, assuch, in the writings of communication and information theory. In the modern theoryof nonlinear motion called dynamical systems, in-between entropies can begenerated by chaotic systems that are non-uniform in their rates of separation ofnear by points and convergence of far-away points in dynamics that have beenpreviously described as nonuniformly hyperbolic.The energies and their transformations that fuel and support karmic escapefrom the personality fixations of samsara and accession to unmanifest Divine Lifecan occur without the loss of the richness and multiplicity of apparent reality. Biginternal changes without external sign can occur in the arrangements of theineffable and mysterious formless silence within which we have associated withstates of high, but not maximal, in-between entropy. For examples, the Indian Saint,Sri Aurobindo, in the early 20 th Century, the Catholic metaphysical anthropologist,Teilhard de Chardin and currently American pandits (spiritual seekers withintellectual and academic inclinations) such as Ken Wilber, among many othersover the millennia, direct us toward the goal of Nirvanically changeless emptinesswithout the properties of space or time. At the same time, we maintain an astuteand effective yet distantiated appreciation for existential realities. The non-dualenlightenment of Integral Being or Yoga involves realizing emptiness through theworld of form. There is a way of thinking about and even computing that “nothingwithin” and its changes.As John R. Pierce suggested in the 1981 revision of his book that made thetheorems of the father of communication theory, Claude Shannon, so accessible,“…if we want to understand information-related entropies, it is perhaps best to clearour minds of any (physical) ideas associated with the entropy of physics.”69Nonetheless, historical comments about what the classical thermodynamic term,entropy, is and is not about are in order.We recall that Richard Feynmann, in his well-known 1962 class notes,Lectures on Physics, said that the subject of thermodynamics is the study ofrelationships among the heat, energetic and organizational properties of materials,without knowing their internal structure. Historically, the relational formalisms ofequilibrium thermodynamics emerged before our knowledge of the internal structureof matter. For examples, the pressure in an insulated container of gas is due tomolecular bombardment of the container walls, which increases with heat orcompression of its volume. Compression of its volume increases its temperatureand expansion of its volume leads to cooling. Note that these relationships holdwithout specifying the constituents and the specifics of a particular gas or solid.In his lectures, Feynman’s intuitively accessible examples of reversiblethermodynamic properties are reminiscent of his on camera performance at theSenatorial hearings about the Challenger disaster. Recall that he dropped an O-ringin a glass of iced water demonstrating cold-induced rigidification of the rubber ring,which he postulated to be the cause of the fuel leak and resulting explosion. In hisLectures, he said that if one holds a rubber band between ones lips as a crudethermometer, stretching a rubber band heats up the lips and relaxing it cools them.Working the same system in reverse, and equilibrium thermodynamic systems areclassically reversible, we find that heating a rubber band makes it contract. Thesechanges involve complicated alterations in the internal arrangements of thepolymeric strands of rubber, their structural properties, the details of which, for thepurpose of global thermodynamic characterization, need not be known. Therelationships between physical state, energy and temperature in this material werepredictable from thermodynamic laws even without specific knowledge of thecomplex internal structure and physical dynamics of rubber.Thermodynamic theory, which makes deep conceptual connections betweenquantitatively measurable primitives such as heat, hotness and work and theinvisible in the form of derived ideas such as energy and entropy, yielded an70enormously rich and logically consistent intellectual framework from within which tocharacterize macroscopic behavior composed of unknown molecular mechanisms.Ideas about entropy grew out of William Thomson's (a.k.a Lord Kelvin)thermodynamic laws about energy conservation and its allowable transformations.Later Clausius decomposed the energy into that which was available for mechanicalwork, called work-content, and that which was not, called transformation content.He referred to the transformation content, a reflection of what changes in theinternal order properties of the system that occurred as a concomitant of changes inenergy and heat, as the entropy.Rudolph Clausius added the word entropy as a thermodynamic property tothe conceptual armamentarium of theoretical physics in about 1865. This followedthe earlier work of the French engineer, Nicolas Leonard Sadi Carnot, who wastrying to develop a theoretical framework within which efficiencies in heatgeneratingengines might be understood. It implicated positive, > 0, changes, d, inentropy, S, with changes in time, t, i.e. dSdt> 0, entropy is increasing in time, as aconcomitant of the inevitable mechanical inefficiencies in an energy driven system.The resulting losses in the form of wasted energy show up as increases inmolecular motion, which could be estimated from the increases in heat. Wastedenergy dissipated as heat increases the amount of random motion and volumeoccupied by the surrounding molecules in physical processes involving heat,pressure, vaporization, condensation and work; all elements of that era’s dominantphysical metaphor, the steam engine.The highly developed, multifaceted, often quite abstract formalcharacteristics of the inferred property, entropy, prevent glib definitions andgeneralizations. In the context of Kelvin-Clausius theory, the entropy of a closedsystem will remain the same if it is isolated from any matter or energy exchangeswith the environment. If heating a system such that the change, d, in heat, Q, ispositive, i.e. dQ > 0, it experiences a rearrangement in its microstructural motions,but the temperature is left unchanged. The (inferred) entropy, S, increases (i.e., dS> 0) as the ratio of change in added heat, dQ, over the unchanging, absolute71temperature, T. Thus, one definition of entropy change is dS = dQ/T. In classicalcontexts, dS is expressed in units of heat called Joules per degree of absolutetemperature in units Kelvin, the temperature in Centigrade plus 273.16 o . The bestknownphysical image involves the heat-energy transfer to and from heat bathscalled reservoirs as intermediate actions of the work of the heat driven engineexecuting what has come to be known as the Carnot Cycle. The same formulationemerges in this more concrete context: the heat, Q, transfer, dQ, at a particularabsolute temperature, T, dQ/T, has been used to define an entropy change, dS =dQ/T related to some not-need-to-know-about specific alteration(s) in a system’sinternal physical properties.If one allows some loose thinking about heat-induced increases in thestatistical randomness of molecular motion in the above reservoir that is associatedwith the loss of useable energy, the positive entropy change, dS > 0, is vaguelyrelatable to the kinds of information entropies to be discussed below. If a gastrapped in an insulated, physically isolated, closed cylinder is allowed to expandinfinitely slowly, reversibly, called adiabatically, pushing up the piston that closed offits end, the gas will become cooler, energy having been expended doing the work oflifting the piston. Defined as an isolated system (of course no where in the real, nonlaboratory,world can this condition of absent exchanges of energy or matter withthe environment be found), it is a reversible process, because returning the energyof the work by, again, infinitely slowly pushing down on the piston and compressingthe gas to its original volume, returns it to its former temperature-defined energystate. In this historically prominent thought-toy of physics, there has been areversible change in energy but no changes in the entropy, dS = 0. The gas’s heat,temperature (and energy and volume) can be completely restored in thismetaphysically mythic classical thermodynmical tale of an entropy-conserving,reversible process.While fixed entropy and independence of the specific path is the case for theabove noted abstract reversible cycle, in the real, irreversible orbits of most physicaland all biological systems, entropy increases, dS > 0. Walter Nernst’s 1907 heattheorem yields a zero point from which to determine a difference measure in the72postulated, real physical world of ever-increasing entropy. He showed that at anabsolute temperature of zero, entropy is zero. We can illustrate an approach to thissingular state by placing a heated metal rod in ice water which would result in adecrease in the entropy of the rod’s molecular motions by dQ/ T 1 < 0, the coolingreducing the complexity of molecular motion in the metal bar and an increase in theentropy of the water by dQ/T 2 > 0 indicating an increase in the amount andcomplexity of the surrounding water’s molecular motions. Of course the heat movesfrom metal rod to the water as T 1 →T 2 making dQ > 0 positive and the entropychange, dS = dQ/ T 2 - dQ/ T 1 , also positive. In another simple example, producingfriction by rubbing a surface generates heat, dQ > 0, at a temperature T. Thisinduces a positive change in entropy, dQ/ T > 0, in the form of increasing amountand complexity of the patterns of molecular motion in the air surrounding the rubbedsurface.Using another related and well-known thermodynamic thought toy, theoriginal isolated, insulated body of gas in the cylinder is partitioned by a membraneinto two chambers, one containing all the gas with its temperature, pressure andability to do mechanical work and the other a vacuum without these properties. Thisequilibrium state is changed into another equilibrium state by suddenly removing themembrane, filling both chambers with gas and, while increasing its entropyirreversibly, dS > 0, removes at least some of the gas’s ability to do piston raisingwork. In the context of classical thermodynamics, it is in this way that irreversibilitycan be defined by its associated increase in entropy. Though there has been nochange in total energy in this insulated closed system, an increase in entropymeans a decrease of the energy available for work. The increased disorder in thegas is associated with the loss of ability to convert heat, thermal energy, intomechanical energy. Historically important and still available elementary texts byEnrico Fermi (1936), Mark Zemansky (1957) and Herbert Callen (1985), amongmany others, explicate clearly the formal, but far from biologically relevant, classicaltheory of the physical entropy of closed equilibrium thermodynamic systems.Growing in part out of the formal thermodynamics of physics, statisticalmechanics offers yet another set of intuitions about the not-necessarily-known73molecular details associated with changes in entropy. These ideas are closer toapplicability in problems of making measures on the behavior of biological systems.Very generally, in the statistical mechanical context, an increase in entropy means adecrease in the order, which can be a quantitative observable reflecting a decreasein predictability and/or knowledge about the system. For example, we can locate themolecules of the gas more accurately when they are all on one side of themembrane-partitioned cylinder compared with the situation when the membrane issuddenly removed. This accompanying increase in ambiguity and decrease inknowledge in locating a set of gas particles reflects a statistical mechanical view ofincreases in entropy. Can anything general be said about the bounds on anincrease in entropy? The statistical developments of the Yale mathematicalphysicist, Josiah Willard Gibbs (about 1875), consonant with the logical argumentsof the Greek mathematician, Constantin Caratheodory (about 1910), conclude thatthe entropy increase goes to the maximum allowed by the constraints imposed byor upon the system. A change in likelihood as a probability is a characteristic way toquantify the entropy change, reflecting an alteration in knowledge or its reciprocalcomplement, uncertainty. The system’s entropic uncertainty said more colloquially,and relevant to the Bell Syndrome’s women of my life, is its capacity for surprise.A statistical mechanical approach to the total entropy of a bounded set ofmolecules in motion involves summing this property across all the participatingmolecules. We let N be the number of particles involved. As a problem in Newtonianmechanics, each of the N particles is represented in 6N dimensional phase space.That means that each point represents one of the N molecules in the threedimensions of location space plus three dimensions of motion space as its velocity,more specifically, the product of mass times velocity called momentum. This addsup to 6 dimensions of measurement. This so called phase space reconstruction ofthe molecules of a gas as individual particles are a daunting task, though fastcomputers and new algorithms are making computations from first principles moregenerally attainable. Those based on the first principles of short-range repulsionand long-range weak attraction among particles and the bumper-car collision74dynamics between them can now be implemented if the system of particles beingsimulated is sufficiently small and the computer simulation is for very short times.To transform the entropy into something more statistical and global, wereturn to the theoretical work of Ludwig Boltzmann whose formalism was usedpreviously to quantitate pathological developmental simplification. He assumed thatgiven a set of constraints, say the closed volume, V, of a box, B, of a fixed size, V(B), the orbit of each particle would eventually explore all the space in the box thatwas available to it. Boltzmann’s entropy became a constraint dependent, n-dimensional volume measure, with the assumption that the entropy, S, equals thelogarithm of this volume measure, S = ln V (B). To calculate a value for the entropy,compute the volume of the molecular motion as determined by the invariantconstraints of the system, such as the volume, temperature, pressure and/or its totalnumber of molecules. We may partition, discretize, the volume up to some limit ofresolution such that it is divided into Ω small boxes, each containing therepresentation of a particular state.Making the same assumptions of closed system, equilibriumthermodynamics, such a system is completely isolated from outside sources ofmatter and energy, it spends equal time in each of its Ω available states. In such acase, the characteristic occupancy time of any state is inverse to the number ofstates available, e.g. 1/Ω, and the system’s entropy is maximal for that set of states.Under these conditions, S = k ln(Ω), where the k term is the Boltzmann constantthat contributes to the numeric units of entropy, as above, in Joules of heat /degreesKelvin of the temperature. If the system is in contact with a heat bath, but cannotexchange matter with its environment, it is called diathermally isolated. Thedistribution of times spent in the available states of a classical diathermally isolatedsystem of gas molecules can be represented by what is called a Boltzmanndistribution of probabilities of state occupancies, ρ (as a function of their energylevel, more measurably, their responsiveness, susceptibility, to heat). Here thecharacteristic time of the system spent in each state varies as the particular state’sprobability.75Leaving the framework of physical thermodynamic entropies entirely, theentropy of information was introduced in the context of communication engineeringin electrical and electronic devices. The metaphorical machine for the current age ofentropy, analogous to the role of heat and steam engines in classicalthermodynamics, is the computer. Energy in this context is a relatively trivialproperty. Ammeters and other monitors of load are unable to discriminate betweena computer actively engaged in encoding and computation or one simplymaintaining its dynamic memory while resting in computational readiness. Thissituation is very analogous to the results of early work discussed previously on themetabolic rates and sources of the whole brain’s energy, oxygen and glucosemetabolism, by National Institutes of Mental Heath’s Seymore Kety and LouisSokoloff and the State of Illinois Thudicum Laboratory’s Harold Himwich. Usingwhole head arterial-venous, energy-in, energy-out, differences, they could notdemonstrate differences in rates of whole brain metabolism between states in whichthe human subjects were engaged in solving mathematical problems or deeplysleep. In today’s brain imaging research, using a variety of physical reflections ofthe brain’s metabolic activity, it is the differences in regional distributions ofmetabolic activity that are relatable to subjective and behavioral states, notdifferences in total amount of energy expended. In graphically codedrepresentations of the regional metabolism of the brain in action, one or another ormany areas “light up” and others “grow dark” in correlation with changes in thinking,feeling and action.The entropy first developed by Claude Shannon was formalized for use in1948 in what was then called communication theory and now information theory. Itrepresented a measure of the ambiguity and uncertainty that had the potential forbeing resolved by new knowledge. In this context, entropy and information wereobviously complementary descriptors. A message that informs us about which often possibilities should be chosen contains less information than one that informs usabout the proper choice to be made from among a thousand possibilities. Theentropy of communication theory is a measure that is computed on uncertainty. Theinformation reception capacity of a system is dependent upon the amount of76uncertainty in the receiver that pre-existed the receipt of the message. In the binarycoding scheme of digital electronic operations, the unit of information is the bit, achoice made between 0 or 1 in the resolution of a two state ambiguity at each placeof some power of two number of places. Our relatively common computers thesedays have 32 or 64 bit processors. If these 0,1 choices are made in a randomsequence in which each step is independent of the previous one, the sequentialprobabilities, � �� � are multiplicative: e.g. the probability of getting two 1’s (headsin a fair coin) in a row are the product of each 0.5 probability: ρ 1 = 0.5 × ρ 2 =�0.5 =ρ 1 ρ 2 = 0.25. Using the common base ten system of logarithms to demonstrate thealgebraic fact that multiplicative probabilities are logarithmically additive (andignoring the minus sign that comes with making logarithms of the decimal fractionsof probability), we notice that log 10 (0.5) = 0.693147 and log 10 (0.25) = 1.386294 andthat 0.693147 + 0.693147 = 1.386294.The dot-dash choices of Morse code machines, the go, no-go gates oftransistors, the open versus closed ion channel-mediated neuronal membranedischarge and the left, right spins of the single electrons of today’s quantumcomputers lead naturally to an information encoding of multiplicative sequences asthe sum of logarithms in base (equal to the number of available states) two, each ρ�=0.5 choice called, log 2 (0.5) = 1, a bit. Shannon’s 1938 master’s thesis mappedGeorge Boole’s algebraic scheme for doing yes-no, either-or computation ontocurrent switching devices such that circuit closed was “true” and circuit open was“false.” Using Boole’s laws such as “Not(A and B)” always equals “(Not A) or (NotB)” led to schemes for circuit routing through electronic gates which also serve forinformation storage in gadgets ranging from cell phone directories to computer harddisks.Following Claude Shannon, each logarithmically additive entropy term isexpressed as the sums, Σ ι � of its probability, ρ ι , times the probability’s logarithm,Σ ι (ρ ι �× log 2 ) (ρ ι ��in base two. A logarithm is an exponent of its relevant base such that,for example, the logarithm, base two, of 2 × 2 × 2, 2 3 , = 3 and 3 bits can encodeeight binary (0,1) numbers: (000, 001, 010,011,100,101,110, and 111). Shannonused a hill-like, called convex, entropy function S (ρ)= -Σ(ρ ln (ρ)). The amount of77information required to gain knowledge of an event is dependent upon theprobability of its occurrence. log 2 (0.5) = 1 is the maximal entropy when modeling theequilibrium entropy of an independent random 0,1, (heads or tails) series ofinformational states as might result from flipping a fair coin a large number of times.This value would be maximal when the coin was fair, ρ(heads, tails) = 0.5, and theentropy would be 2(number of allowed states)×0.5(probability of occupying eachstate)×log 10 (0.5) = 0.693147...or in bits, log 2 (0.5) = 1.More generally, if system’s behavior is distributed equally among its possiblestates, the Shannon entropy is maximal and equal to the logarithm of the number ofdefined states, for example, log 2 (2) = 1. Shannon’s classical equation aboutinformation content says the amount of information, I = -ρ log 2 ρ, measured in bits.The minus sign in this reciprocal relation indicates that the information content ofdata, I, goes up as the probability of occurrence of the observed data, ρ, goesdown. Since soon we will be talking about brains and their various styles ofinformation encoded content as well as its transmission, we note the other famousShannon theorem dealing with limits on the channel capacity, C, for informationtransport is C = Wlog 2 (1+S/N) where W is bandwidth, the range of frequenciesavailable for information transport, S is the strength of the signal and N is thestrength of the noise. Recall that the log 2 (1) = 0 so only the signal-to-noise ratio,S/N contributes to the value of the product of the multiplication by bandwidth, W.Transparent clinical examples come from studies of the perceptual and cognitivedecline in normal geriatric patients in which the range of aural frequencies (W)heard without augmentation decreases with age as does the frequency range (W)observed in their resting brain waves. The inattentiveness of the obsessivelyworried ruminator can be used as an example of brain channel capacity beingreduced by the amount of on going head noise, an increase N, which, of course,reduces the value of S/N and therefore C.Measures of the informational complexity of systems in motion, in contrastwith the information content of a static equilibrium state, are of dynamical entropy.Dynamical entropy is often called H, in contrast with thermodynamic and/orinformational entropy, S. One can begin with a representational image of the78location, velocity and directional tendency of every point generated by a dynamicalsystem by an arrow on the surface of action, the manifold, of a dynamical system.This field of arrows indicating directional and strength of motional tendencies iscalled a vector field. A vector represents its location at the base of the arrow, itsvelocity by the length of the arrow (called the modulus) and the direction of themotion by the direction of the arrow. If we regard all moduli as equal to one, everyvector on the surface has the same length. The resulting graphs are called directionfields. Looking at a stop-action photograph of any point on this surface, itsassociated vector informs about where the system would take it over the next unit oftime. The whole surface can be marked by initial points, which the dynamicalsystems move as they generate patterns of orbits of moving arrows in time. Thefollowing two brain and behavioral experimental circumstances make this depictionand its relevance to dynamical entropy more concrete.We review in more detail the concrete and visualizable findings fromexperiments requiring the quantification of characteristic patterns of motion inanimals and man. They can be embedded into a similar surface-like setting, whichmight be called a behavioral manifold. For examples, my students from the past,Martin Paulus and Mark Geyer, now Professors at the Medical School of the LaJolla branch of the University of California studied the effects of psychotropic drugson the patterns made on the floor by rats of various genetic strains while theywandered about, in exploratory behavior in a bounded space. Monitored by a videocamera placed above the ceiling less cages, the patterns made by the paths takenby the rats over time were reconstructed as vectorial orbits on a behavioralmanifold. This manifold was then repeatedly partitioned, covered with, from just afew large, in graded progression, to many smaller boxes, each partition composedof rectangular lattices of a particular size. Units of time were also partitioned intorange of units from larger to smaller durations of observation. Differences in therat’s genetic strain as well as injections of stimulants, antidepressants orantipsychotic drugs resulted in characteristic and discriminable path geometriesmapped onto the behavioral manifold as orbital patterns. Each path was encodedas a sequence of size-dependent numbered boxes that were entered and occupied79or left. The new information being generated by the pattern of spatial orbits took theform of sequences of numbers or symbols representing the sequence of labeledboxes. The complexity of these numeric or symbol sequences was then quantifiedin a variety of ways including the use of two fundamental measures of dynamicalentropy.One measure reflects how many new, previously unexplored boxes wereentered by the rat per unit of time. This rate represents a percent of the possible.The second measure reflects how much of the time did the rat in each box visitedas a distribution of the probable. The rate of expansion of the possible and therelative time in occupancy of these possibles, the probables, form the bases for thecomputation of these two kinds of entropies. For example, the work of Paulus andGeyer showed that the administration of a very small amount of stimulant drug,compared with a salt water control, led to an increase in the first measure of thenumber of new, previously unexplored, boxes entered per unit time. With respect tothe second measure, the stimulant drug augmented exploratory activity was alsomore uniformly distributed over the possible boxes, making for more uniformprobability. Administration of higher doses of stimulant drugs, at a critical dose, ledsuddenly to more spatially and temporally restricted and stereotyped patterns ofmotion of the rats, compulsive circling alternating with frozen sniffing. Bothcontributed to a decrease in the possible and nonuniformity in the distribution of theprobabilities. In man, low doses of amphetamine tend to increase the rate andcreativity of thought streams and high doses generate fixed ideas and paranoiddelusions. In the statistical approach to nonlinear dynamical systems, timedependentgeneration of new possibilities is called topological entropy, H T and theentropy associated with the distribution of probabilities is called the metric entropy,H M. These kinds of entropies have also been used to quantitate characteristicpatterns of in human behavior as well.We have previously mentioned these measures as used in humanexperiments by Karen Selz, a Research Professor of Psychiatry at Emory Universityin Atlanta. Recall that she devised a set of experiments leading to unobtrusivemeasures made on human subjects by asking them to remove, as many as they80could, the dots in a lattice, one by one, from the computer screen, by clicking oneach point with a mouse. In some experiments, after removal, the dot reappeared infifty milliseconds, in the “fast return condition”, or after one-second delay in the“slow return condition.” Unbeknown to the subject, the path made by the motions oftheir mouse on the computer screen over time while removing dots werereconstructed as a path on a fine to coarse grained box-partitioned behavioralmanifold. Entropic indices of the rate of expansion of the possible, number of newboxes entered, reflecting H T , and the relative occupancy of the partition of thepossible, reflecting H M , the distribution of probabilities with respect to the boxes,could then be computed. For examples, Selz found that the spatial and temporalpatterns of computer mouse motions made in this dot search and destroy taskcorrelated highly with the subjects’ age, sex and personality types as defined byprofiles from the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory, MMPI, and theStructured Clinical Interview, SCI, associated with the standard Diagnostic andStatistical Manual, DSM IV. She found that subjects whose personalities were likemy high self-sensibility girlfriends demonstrated high indices of both H T and H M .The actions of nonintegrable nonlinear differential equations, not solvable bythe usual techniques of integration, can be transformed into graphical images byplotting their orbits in abstract phase spaces with the three physically measurablecoordinates of location x (or some other temporarily fixed value), velocity y (the rateof change in the location or measured value) and z acceleration (the rate of changeof the rate of change in location or value) in x, y, z space. Graphical representationsof the system in action in phase space can serve in place of analytic solutions to theequations. This idea was one of Henri Poincare’s major contributions tomathematics and physics, and has come to be the centerpiece of the qualitativetheory of differential equations. The often point-to-point unpredictable but globallyand qualitatively characteristic geometric shapes of the orbital patterns in abstractphase space are the objects of interest. There are visualizable representations suchas cycles as circles and statistical measures made on these objects such as the H Tand H M entropies and the in-betweenness (neither maximal nor minimal) of theirdifference.81A global statistical context for these qualitative differential systems wasinspired by the Russian mathematician, Andrei Nikolaevic Kolmogorov. In his nowfamous foundational talk about the stability of classical mechanical systems in thefinal session of the 1954 International Congress of Mathematics, he gave publicbirth to, among other ideas, what has come to be called the ergodic or statistical,measure theory of dynamical systems. Here, ergodic means the existence of aninvariant statistical measure on the phase space attractor of the system that can beobtained using a variety of equivalent methods and beginning the count at any of itspoints. Two phase space objects generated by a dynamical system may lookdifferent in phase space but their statistical measures may all be the same, i.e.invariant. These qualitative orbits in a box-partitioned space can be visualized asPaulus and Geyer’s rats exploring a space and Selz’s path sequences of computerscreen dot quenches produced by clicking on them with a computer mouse.A precursor of Kolmogorov’s ergodicity was the earlier ergodicity of LudwigBoltzmann. This describes a suitably partitioned system such that equivalent valuescome from quantitating the behavior of one single orbit exploring the space of thelattice of boxes over very long times time as those obtained from a single aggregatephotograph of all orbits run from all possible starting places simultaneously. Theergodicity of gas-like molecular randomness implicates systems being in one of onlytwo possible equilibrium statistical states: measure zero (at most occupying a singlepoint, zero, minimal entropy) or its “complement,” full measure one (occupying allavailable space in a state of maximal entropy). Joseph Goldstein, a well knownteacher of meditation, giving advice recorded in Daniel Goleman’s 1977 book on thesubject said that all methods of nirvana directed meditation amounted to “…simplemathematics …all systems aiming for One or Zero—union with God or emptiness.”In place of the maximal or minimal values for the H T and H M entropies of thesestates of transcendence, we in the world of samsara are stuck in states of inbetweenentropy which invariant statistical measures of on phase space shapeshelp quantify.To generalize measures made on rat and computer mouse paths to moregeneral and idealized systems, after plotting an orbital path in a phase space, we82may partition the space of values taken by the journey of the orbital actiongenerated by the equation over time with rectangular grids of increasing fineness.The result is an equipartition of phase space such that there is at most one orbitalpoint in each rectangle of the grid, with, of course, many rectangles in the finer gridsbeing empty. This final grid partition is called a generating partition. The proportionof the available boxes of the partition occupied by points is called its area or volumemeasure. This measure has been given a variety of names including Liouville, Haarand Lesbegue measures. If every box is occupied, it has measure one. If at mostone box, it has measure zero. If we allow partitions to be non-uniform and/or notfine enough to be generating and apply probability weightings for how many pointsfall into each particular box of the grid, the method is called the Sinai-Ruelle-Bowenor SRB measure after Kolmogorov’s students and followers, the Russian, Ya Sinai,the Belgian Frenchmen, David Ruelle and the American, Rufus Bowen.Similar to the SRB measure, the distribution of box occupancy probabilitiesmultiplied by their logarithms and summed over all cells of the partition yields astatistical measure that is close to the informational entropy of Claude Shannon asdescribed above. It is called the metric entropy ( H M = -Σ(ρ i ln(ρ i )), where H meansentropy and ρ i is the proportion of the total observations that occupy cell i of thephase space or state space partition. It was the above noted Russian father ofmodern dynamical systems, Kolmogorov, who in 1956 proved that the Shannonmetric entropy is a quantifiable invariant of systems even in very complicatedmotion. Stanford University's Donald Ornstein won a Field’s Medal (the under fortyyear old mathematician’s Nobel Prize) for his late 1960’s work proving that theShannon metric entropy, H M , was the only invariant for a large class of appropriatelydefined, expansive (near by points separating in time) dynamical systems. Recallthat we refer to metric entropy reflecting the relative occupancy as probabilityamong the possible boxes (or states) as H M . H M is maximal when the percentageoccupancy of all occupied boxes is uniform.IBM’s Roy Adler in New York and Brian Marcus in California, HebrewUniversity’s Benjamin Weiss, Warwick University’s English mathematicians, WilliamParry, Peter Walters, Mark Pollicott and others developed and proved the relevance83of a related measure of the rapidity of dynamical expansion, the generation of newinformation seen as the rate of entering new boxes of the partition, a logarithmicrate of expansion of the possible. Counting the number of previously unoccupiedsquares entered by the dynamical systems orbit per unit time over the generatingpartition, for instance, yields an estimate of entropy that, as in the rat and computermouse examples above, is called the topological entropy, H T . H T , is about howmuch new information is being generated by the system per unit time. Theoremshave been proven that H T is a maximal estimate of the global dynamical entropywith H M proven to be a minimum estimate. Monitoring single or aggregate molecularmotion in a system with the maximum randomness of a space filling gas, we findthat, on the average, every box is entered and occupied uniformly such that H T = H Mor said another way, H T – H M = 0.As evidenced by the above described experiments in rats and people, thesame entropic relations (but usually not with maximal or minimal measure) can befound in biological systems. We have previously described the manifold geometry ofa generic (typical, idealized) nonlinear dynamical systems as hyperbolic defined bythe presence of simultaneous but decomposable components of the motionincluding the straight ahead and round and round actions on the center manifold,the new possibility generating, expansive, away from the center manifold motionsalong unstable manifolds and the back to the center manifold, contracting motions,along the stable manifolds. Uniform expansive and contractive influences in the flowleads to mixing of the order of the initial sequence of the values inscribed by theorbits. This results in maximization of the entropies and satisfaction of aconcomitant of the uniformly hyperbolic condition, H T – H M = 0.These clean and mathematically proven findings do not hold for the quasimessthat is human neuropsychobiology. Enmeshed as most of us are in onlyintermittently random or nonuniformly hyperbolic systems with the in-betweenentropies of the only apparently real world of maya, H T – H M ≠ 0. How the H T – H M= 0 of uniform hyperbolicity fails, H T – H M ≠ 0, and along with it the dispassionatedetachment of entropic emptiness and fullness, becomes a problem not unrelated tothe existence and quantitative qualities of personality styles and their dissolution84with return toward but not reaching the maximally entropic openness, flexibility andnaïve credulousness of the in Jesus and Holy Ghost occupying transcendentdynamical states. We are all stuck somewhere in the range of measures indicatingin-between entropies.Further Readings for Sensual In-Between EntropiesEcstasy in Secular and Religious Experience, Marghanita Laski, Tarcher, LosAngeles, 1961.The Role of Neural Plasticity in Chemical Intolerance, Barbara A. Sorg and Iris R.Bell, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. Vol. 933, 2001The neuropsychiatric and somatic characteristics of young adults with and withoutself-reported chemical odor intolerance and chemical sensitivity, I.D. Bell, C.S.Miller, G.E. Schwartz, Arch. Environ. Health 51:9-21, 1996.Application of entropy measures derived from the ergodic theory of dynamicalsystems to rat locomotor behavior, M. Paulus, M. Geyer, L. Gold, A. Mandell, Proc.Natl. Acad. Sci. (USA) 87:723-727, 1990.Long-range interactions in sequences of human behavior, Martin Paulus, Phys.Rev. E. 55:3249-3256,1997.Mixing properties in human behavioral style and time dependencies in behavioridentification: The modeling and application of a universal dynamical law. Karen A.Selz, UMI, Ann Arbor, 1992.A family of autocorrelation graph equivalence classes on symbolic dynamics asmodels of individual differences in human behavioral style, Karen A. Selz and85Arnold J. Mandell, In (ed. R.R. Vallacher and A.J. Nowak), Dynamical Systems inSocial Psychology, Academic Press, San Diego, 1994.Toward a neuropsychopharmacologicy of habituation: a vertical integration. ArnoldJ. Mandell, Math. Modeling 7:809-888,1986.Thermodynamics, Enrico Fermi, Dover, N.Y. 1956.Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics, Peter T. Landsberg, Dover, N.Y. 1978.Ergodic Theory, Symbolic Dynamics and Hyperbolic Spaces, T. Bedford, M. Keaneand C. Series, Oxford, Oxford, 1991.The Mathematical Theory of Communication, Claude E. Shannon and WarrenWeaver, U. of Illinois Press, Urbana, 1963.Science and Information Theory, Leon Brillouin, Academic Press, N.Y. 1962.Brain Metabolism and Cerebral Disorders, Harold E. Himwich, Williams and Wilkins,Baltimore, 1951.86CHAPTER 5:SOME ENTHEOGENIC ENTROPIESIn the spring of 1968, members of my laboratory team were looking for newbrain metabolic pathways of the essential amino acid tryptophan, the dietaryprecursor of the human mood, sleep and libidinal neurotransmitter, serotonin. Afterstruggling for several months to identify an apparently new compound, which turnedout not to be new but only new in the brain, we collected evidence for a humanbrain enzyme that could catalyze the production of an LSD-like hallucinogen,dimethyltryptamine, DMT. Tracing its metabolic origins, we found that DMT wasderived from tryptamine, a common metabolite of the essential and omnipresentamino acid, tryptophan. This enzyme and its metabolic product were located inhighest concentrations in brain stem systems that influence the neural regulation ofthe heart, blood pressure, temperature, breathing, vomiting and primitive approachavoidancebehavior. It was also found in limbic brain nuclei thought to modulate theemotional coloring of perception and thought. Richard Wyatt, working at theNational Institutes of Mental Health found DMT in the urine of schizophrenichumans. He also showed that DMT increased significantly if tryptamine’s normalpathway for degradation was blocked by monoamine oxidase inhibitors, such as87Nardil, Marplan, Eutony, Parnate and others of a then common family ofantidepressant drugs.The presence of a DMT-generating enzyme in human brain was particularlyexciting because we knew from the work of Harvard botanist, Richard Shultes andothers, that DMT and the monoamine oxidase inhibitor, beta carboline, arecombined in a mixture of the leaves of a shrub and the bark of a vine, bothAmazonian plants, used together by the shaman of Peru, Colombia and Ecuador forthousands of years to evoke mystical experiences in themselves. In their state ofchemically-facilitated, spiritual transformation, they were better able to engage inhealing and divination of others. More recently this and other similarly actingbiochemicals have been called entheogenic, “connecting to the sacred within.”Consistent with our neurochemical findings in human brain, the shamanicconcoction, called by many names including ayahuasca and yage, combined theDMT containing plant, Psychotria viridis, with an extract of a vine with the powerfulmonoamine oxidase inhibitor properties of the beta carbolines found inBanisteriospsis caapi. In 1975, working with a graduate student, Louise Hsu, wefound that the mammalian brain could also synthesize beta carbolines. This familyof compounds from the vine protects the tryptamine substrate as well as DMT frommetabolic degradation such that it could circulate in the blood long enough after oralingestion for enough to cross the blood brain barrier to induced prolonged anddramatic alterations in perceptions, feelings and thoughts. In addition, thecarbolines of the Benisteriospsis component extended the time of action of DMTbeyond the 15-30 minutes of effect of DMT when injected alone in human subjects.We found it fascinating that the human brain made combinations of DMT and betacarbolines similar to the blend that indigenous shamamic chemists discovered as anentheogenic from plant sources.Ralph Metzner, in the introduction to his 1999 collection of papers calledAyahuasca concluded that “…it is widely recognized by anthropologists asbeing…the most powerful and most widespread of the shamanic hallucinogens.”William Burrough in a 1953 City Lights published book written with Allen Ginsberg,The Yage Letters, said that yage “…gave entrance to a city where all human88potential is spread out in a silent market…” It was generally believed that withadequate spiritual preparation, ayahuasca could generate transcendent states thatallowed access to ones inner being and the beings of other worlds that could serveas sources of mystical knowledge and healing. The Shams dervish of the 13 thCentury, wandering the Turkish portion of the Silk Road, used the word sohbet todescribe the inner land of mystical conversations about mystical subjects that theirturning meditation, whirling, and the shaman’s entheogenic compounds such asDMT give entrance.The question was whether our finding of DMT and its human brain enzymehad been an artifact, an accidental laboratory fluke. Members of my neurochemicalresearch teams at the University of California Medical Schools in Irvine and LaJolla, notably Dr. Lee Poth, now a professor of pediatric endocrinology at theUniform Services Medical School in Washington D.C., demonstrated that the DMTsynthesizing enzyme existed in the brains of recent accident victims that as far aswe were able to learn from their family and social histories, had been completelypsychologically normal. More than a little bit startled by this finding and worriedabout making a sensational scientific mistake, we repeated the experiments with avariety of controls with the same findings. Though our original estimates of thehuman brain enzyme concentration were on the high side, we confirmed the generalfinding and published them in Science in 1969 and Nature in 1970. Our carbolinework was published in the Journal of Neurochemistry in 1975. A year or so after ourNature paper was published, the Nobel Prize winning neuropharmacologist at theNational Institutes of Mental Health, Julius Axelrod, confirmed the presence of theDMT biosynthetic enzyme that converted the tryptophan product, tryptamine, toDMT in mammalian brain tissue. We were both delighted and relieved.We speculate, perhaps too grandly, that this finding, along with the betacarboline human brain synthesizing capacity, supplies one of many possibleneurobiological and neurochemical mechanisms for the claims of the cross-culturaluniversality of mystical experience. We all had human brains with these enzymes.The idea that the phenomena accompanying primary religious experience werecommon to all cultures was a major theme of the life’s work of the philosopher-89psychologist, William James, and was studied using fieldwork by anthropologistssuch as Bronislaw Malinolowki as described in his classic book, Magic, Science andReligion. Was this neurochemical-behavioral organization an evolutionarily adaptivemechanism selected so that some spiritually gifted individuals self-selected from aseverely stressed population could escape and then lead the rest of us out of asense world that had become intolerable? Could this be an antidote for thehopeless, without materialistic solutions and trapped in a belief system of spiritualnihilism? Was this a brain chemical transcendence escape and spiritual deliverysystem for the suprapsychological survival of those in dire need? As the 13 thCentury Islamic mystic, Jelaluddin Rumi, has written, “If a tree could fly off, itwouldn’t suffer the saw…” and more concretely, “…if you can’t go somewhere,move into the passageways of the self…,” a spiritual escape via a neurobiologicalroad to the God-space within.What followed were a few years of occasional exploration of an “inside out”understanding of the mystical states evoked by the entheogenic family of chemicals.There were varieties of settings for these personal experiments. I found myselfLSD-lost, circling endlessly in the tall silence of a Northern California redwoodforest. I tried on Hunter Thompson’s mescaline lenses for the experience of LasVegas unfiltered. I was expertly mentored in these quests by a distinguishedcollection of guides: Cultural anthropologist Michael Harner who taught me aboutthe yage and datura use among the shaman of the Jivaro; Social anthropologist,Barbara Meyerhoff introduced me to the personal renewal rituals of the peyotecactus-using Huichol Indians of the Southwestern Sonora Desert; Neurochemicallysophisticated Sidney Cohen, founding director of the National Institutes of Health’sInstitute on Drug Abuse, told me stories of his involvement with Aldous Huxley andBarbara Brown in the Los Angeles covey of early American LSD explorers; organicchemist Albert Hoffman, Sandoz’s designer of a series of ergot alkaloids includingLSD, told me stories of his accidental post-sniff hallucinations while returning homeon a bicycle; An anonymous group of us conducted personal experiments withSacha Shulgin, the University of California at Berkeley professor who firstsynthesized and tested the mescaline-derived, Ecstasy series of compounds; We90did some work with the dissociated anesthesias (producing wide awake but notthere states) having consulted with John Lilly, a brain scientist who used theseagents as a courageous self-medicating explorer of sensory isolation tanks; I metseveral native shamanic practitioners including the Huichol Indian that was themodel for Don Juan in Carlos Castanada’s five volumes of pseudoethnographywritten up in my essay “Is Don Juan Alive and Well?” in The Pushcart Prize of 1977.Issues of culture and brain chemistry came together in several accounts aboutentheogenic, mescaline-containing peyote use among the Huichol Indians in a bookedited by Kathleen Berrin and Thomas Seligman of the San Francisco Art Museumcalled Art of the Huichol Indians.Over these years I collected many nauseating, upper and lower bowelwrenching and ecstatically transcendent and exhausting day-long episodes of theangular geometries of visual pattern-generating DMT, the animistic breathing ofbush and flower breathing peyote cactus, the darkly forbidding shadows of thepsylocybin-containing mushrooms, the irreversible rocket launches into theelectrically buzzing, kaleidoscopic circus of LSD-containing vials from Sandoz andthe optimistic, trust engendering, expansively warm rush of six of Sacha Shulgin’sgregarious, rave dancing, chlorinated, methoxylated and ethoxylatedphenylethylamines which he had, years before, synthesized for “an undisclosedpurpose” for the Dow Chemical Corporation under contract with the U.S. ArmyChemical Corps. The best known of the latter group remains part of the rave cultureas Ecstasy.These agent’s peaks are flooded with exaggerated, caricaturizing images ofpeople’s faces and a belief in the mindedness of animals and even the embodimentof inanimate things. Evoked are simultaneous and diametrically conflictinginterpretations of the same social context, heteromodal sensory fusion calledsynesthesia so that sound bespoke color and smells induced music, habitualthoughts rearranged as new ideas in what is experienced as exciting new insights,and, most of all, that which Louis Lewin, Berlin’s early 20 th Century Freud ofpsychotropic drugs in his book Fantastica, called gladness of the soul. TimothyLeary wrote of entheogenic escape from the habitual human brain’s mental-91manipulative and socio-sexual circuits gaining access to the rapture and ecstasybrain pathways on the way to the new planet within.What is seldom written about is the aftermath of chemical entheogenicagents. After the several hours of fireworks, all of these entheogenic agents, somemore than others, gifted me with weeks to months of more self-sufficient, emotionalfullness and ease in the conduct of living that was less contaminated by narcissisticpreoccupation or defensive distantiation. I was left with increased interpersonalsensitivity and a noticeable repair of my deficiencies in aesthetic sensibility,particularly for the visual arts and landscapes. What were once two dimensional,trivial, beside-the-point, scattered copses of trees and apparently casual arrays ofplant life in the Boboli Gardens behind the Palazzo Pitti in Florence, became thegrandly structured, botanical wonder of increased dimension, communicating awefilled new perceptions of its previously unseen beauty. For the first time, I foundmyself walking slowly and stopping for several minutes, wordless, spellbound, infront of the modern art pieces of New York’s Guggenheim Museum. Lost in theexperience, I found myself exclaiming to no one in particular, “I can see!”The delicacy and deliciousness of post-entheogenic agent’s new andbeautiful everything made me tiptoe watchfully so as not to injure an ant. Feelings ofomnipersonal kindness and generous compassion were without prideful selfreflection.This state of grace felt like an invasion of a shimmering presence thatmade contact with my other, generally unknown to me, life. It brought newperceptions, feelings and ideas for which I was moved to give thanks. I began tothink I understood a little bit about what was meant by living in the Spirit andmerging with God. Mircea Eliade, the French, University of Chicago Professor of theHistory of Religions, in his classic The Sacred and Profane, calls the revelation ofthe sacred in ordinary objects, people and events an hierophany. In the state thatthis requires, “…all nature is capable of revealing itself as cosmic sacrality….” Theentire world can become a hierophany with what Abraham Abulafia called anactivated mind, the Jewish soul of emergent properties called the Nefesh.This entirely new world, Rudolf Otto in his 1917 Das Helige (The Sacred)called it ganz andere, (wholly other, something else), seemed to emerge92spontaneously along with an instantaneous knowing-how-it-is-with-you-and-I-andall-of-usthat made even vicious killers appear sympathetic. Is this what theCharismatic New Testament Book Churches mean by redemption throughforgiveness of others, requiring the genuine sincerity of this thought beforequalifying for Communion? Is this Christ’s undemanding gift of grace as in Romans4: where Paul observed that all of us fall short of the full glory of God unless justifiedfreely by His grace. Was this the New Testament’s spiritual technological advancefrom the Old Testament’s and Koran’s eye-for-an-eye? Did this chemically triggeredtranscendent experience differ significantly from the supernatural transformation ofindividuals by the Holy Spirit of Christian revivalist teachings? Martin Marty,University of Chicago’s Professor of Modern Church History, dates theinstitutionalization of this personal transformation in the United States to the post-Civil War period. Did this mean that the mysteriously selfless love of Christianagape and the altruism of E.O. Wilson’s sociobiology lay waiting in the brain andcould appear spontaneously, by grace, without lawful directive, repetitive recitationor the discipline of catechism?As one might have suspected, the urgency of my inner and outer search for anew spiritual ecology of mind was driven by more personal needs. My spiritualhunger was made acute a couple of years before our laboratory’s DMT discoverywhen as a 30 year old Assistant Professor of Psychiatry and Neuroscience at UCLAin West Los Angeles, I was living in a small, heavily mortgaged house in Brentwoodwith my graduate student wife and two young sons. A testicular lump was anaccidental discovery made while showering. After surgical biopsy and radical lymphnode dissection, the professor of urology gave me a diagnosis of right testicularchoriocarcinoma. All by itself, my testicle had given birth to a mass containing all theembryological tissues of a fetus, and had thrown in some maternal placental cellsas lagniappe. Unlike now, when the group of testicular neoplasms are treatedsuccessfully with a high survival rate (think Lance Armstrong), at that time, follow upresearch of this young man’s disease by the Army Medical Corps promised a fiveyearsurvival rate of only 5% to 10%. The news filled me with fear and the ensuinghopeless resignation detached me from life with a dread broken up only by93episodes of rageful envy of everyone else in the world that had been spared. Mywife escaped into an alcoholic flirtation with her major professor; my sons grewincreasingly ensconced in the generous and kind neighborhood homes of theirplaymates. I metered as many hours as possible in equity growing, long lonely daysin a small, dark, couch filled, university office, listening to Beverly Hills, Brentwoodand West Los Angles citizens as they psychoanalyzed their mysterious lack ofemotional fulfillment from materialistic fulfillment. Legend has it that Gautama’ssudden insight about the universality of this sated, bored condition occurred in 528B.C. after 49 days of sitting in the lotus position under the bodhi tree, now calledficus religiosa. In contrast with Buddha’s illumination, my psychoanalytic traininginduced,Freudian-Darwinian instinctual conflict, driven by fears of starvation andcastration, drew me tighter into the world of meaningless, coin flip probabilities.Our house was a block away from a West Los Angeles synagogue and weknew the Rabbi and his family well. Our sons played together frequently. The Rabbitried to bring comfort to me on my death watch, with hours of discussions abouttrans-individual, ethnic belonging and a deeper foray into philosophical humanism.Both felt completely irrelevant to my condition. As an intern tending to those dying atnight in Ochsner Foundation Hospital in New Orleans, it seemed to me that Jewstended to die more noisily than Catholics. For my personal escape from low-lyingdread, I needed the metrically linear time of chronos to become the metric-free,topological, continuous surface of the twisted circular ribbon of a Mobius loop, withthe view from each moment a kairos, a stretchable infinity of each moment’s internalmultiplicity of times.The ruthlessly reasonable Hebraic historicity, configured by the tooth-for-atooth,Mosaic and Roman talion law, the reciprocal, economic, exchange-calculatingbrains of Barkow, Cosmide and Tooby’s The Adapted Mind (1992) and the terrifyingstories of the Five Books of Moses, made the hopelessness of this sinner’s plightinevitable. It felt like my dichotomous choice of God-type was between One ofmerciless fairness and the He and She of unconditionally forgiving generosity. Themind set of logical problem solving applied to the question about which of these tworepresented the true character of God lead to a momentarily distracting, metaphoric94ecclesial exercise: what were the minimal number of four magical cards need weturn over with preconditions or results on the upsides and downsides if what wasshowing was: (1) Beatifically good; (2) Cursed with extraordinarily bad luck; (3) Notdependent upon personal virtue; (4) Inordinately fortunate in all of life’s trials. Thepay-as-you-go God people would need to pick up (1) and find fortunate life and (2)to find the fate of the non-believer to establish that God was coldheartedly true andfair with the results of flipping (3) and (4) being none contributory. The grace-to-allsinnersGod people need to turn over card (3) to find good life and (4) to findsometime sinners nonetheless fortunate to confirm their belief in the unconditionallyof the loving generosity of God and making finding out about the underside of cards(1) and (2) unnecessary. This liturgical discussion and gamble with God’s cards,perhaps a caricature of the Talmudic, rational discussions with the rabbi, feltirrelevant to my spiritual needs.Missing was mysticism’s promise of the disappearance of I into a union withthe divine, the Heart Sutra’s eternal emptiness of form and the eternal form ofemptiness that gifts with spiritual perspective and not-necessarily-logical intuitionabout unseen Absolute Reality. Forced either-or, binary, card-turning cognition inthe search for God’s logic is unrewarding. As the Dalai Lama, in his Heart ofWisdom Teaching, says, “…all phenomena are emptiness, without definingcharacteristics, they are not born, they do not cease…" In trying to penetrate themystery and promise of this emptiness, it was difficult to surrender my internalparody of what sounded like that day’s Southern California New Age stuff aboutglobal nonaggression, sexual politics, Beadles music, distressed jeans and pot. Inthe synagogue of my neighborhood, experience with a deeply felt, never-you-mindabout-anythingGod of detachment with love, was not on the menus of Friday nightor Saturday morning services. All I could feel was a faithless and nonnegotiablefear.In the work of many mysticism-positive scholars, a classic being EvelynUnderhill’s Mysticism, 1961, it has been speculated that this ineffable state as aunion with a powerful unknown, transcending description in language, becomesmore socially prominent during times of cultural efflorescence. She pointed to the95flowering of mysticism in epochs of the high cultural achievements at the close ofthe Classical Period in the Third Century, the Medieval Period in the FourteenthCentury, the Renaissance in the Seventeenth Century and, now, as we know, in theWestern World toward the end of the Twentieth Century. An increase in generalacceptance of talk, writing and practice focused on mystical experience is said bymany to accompany historical high points in intellectual, literary and politicalachievement. One might include as a component of our growing cultural richness,the new science about chemical dialogues with the brain. Although no centralnervous system agents were ever allowed in the ashrams of Baba Muktananda, itwas common during some evening sessions of questioning, called satsangs, for himto acknowledge that one or a few experiences with entheogenic agents can openmany recalcitrant folks to the existence of the God within. This, in turn, led them tothe drug free spiritual exercises, sadhana, of love, self-truth, and spontaneity (eachaccording to their nature) as well as abstinent discipline, meditation, chanting andyoga to maintain the knowledge. We might speak of participating in the creation andmaintenance of the spiritual ecology of ones inner and outer being. Underhill saidthat the cultural richness of an efflorescent epoch is taken inward and accompaniespersonal and societal mutations into states and institutions involving higher spiritualconsciousness.In addition to an increase in the common outward manifestations of havinghad a mystical experience, such as an increase in compassion, forgiveness andmore respectful and reverential attitudes toward the Earth and all its creatures(currently taking the forms of deep ecology, ecofeminism, herbal medicine, organicfarming and the like), these times bring more public consideration of the nature ofreality itself, apart from its material manifestations. The theme of the life’s work ofthe Dominican priest, Thomas Aquinas, made master of theology by papaldispensation in 1259, involved the existential recognition of this dichotomy ofexistence, esse, and essence, nature and grace, the material world and God.William James wrote famously about mystical experience penetrating the thin veilbetween these two worlds. Those with a mystical orientation attribute reality to innerexperience in relationship to a transcendental, supernatural world. Whereas96everyday events are subject to perceptual ambiguity and its attendant variety ofinterpretations, mystical union is claimed to bring the existence and meaning ofAbsolute Reality into direct experience. This kind of knowing is more akin to thePlatonic view of mathematics, that theorems have been everlastingly existent, frombefore our physical world, then it is to the here and now, physically based, finitecomputations involving the experimental machines of physics.The philosopher-mathematician father of phenomenology, Edmund Husserl,criticized the physics-want-to-be orientation of the 1860 empirical, objectivemeasure psychologies of Fechner and Wundt. He understood the best of theirfindings as simply correlations between subjective and observable events. Usingmathematical discoveries as examples, Husserl spent his life arguing for thepossibility of abstract truths relevant to mind being more reliable and valid if graspedvia direct experience. Knowing by what the popular mid-twentieth century writer ofscience fiction, Robert Heinlein, called grocking it. This is antithetical to the attitudesof today’s human cognitive and brain sciences which disallow such knowing asdeeply suspect unless accompanied by objectively definable observables such aschanges in electrical or imaging indices of brain activity in one neural region orother. The modern psycholinguistics of brain mechanics can be calledneolocationism. Using modern technology to measure regional blood flow, energymetabolism and/or electrovoltage or magnetic field activity, stories of function arespun that closely resemble those imagined more than a century ago by the firstlocationists, such as Ramon Cajal. These neuroanatomists spent thousands ofhours looking at cell clusters and their connections in stained slides of human braintissue using microscopes and imagined their singular and integrated function.Today, Lewis Judd, long time chairperson of the Department of Psychiatry atUCSD in La Jolla, carries a full sized, polymeric, three-dimensional model of thehuman brain when teaching his students about human subjective experience andinterpersonal behavior. In his weekly grand rounds, he explains that day’spsychiatric patient’s problems pointing here and there at regions in this plasticsurrogate for our electrical jellied brain. Few, if any, of the psychiatry students in hisclass was inclined to ask the foundational question: how it is that a finger point and97a name of a brain place can describe, much less explain in the language of physicalor physiological mechanism, a patient’s illogical thoughts, feelings of hopelessness,irrational rage or prayerful gratitude. There remains a wide gap between ideasabout the mechanisms of human symbolic processing and those involving thestructures and functions of neuronal components and their connectivities in thebrain, particularly when perceived as regionally segmented meat. Yet this report ofProfessor Judd’s finger-pointing plastic brain ritual should not elicit surprise sinceiconic manipulation is certainly not new to the practices of priesthood.In contrast with neuropsychiatry’s behavioral attributions to brain parts as anexplanatory pantheon of mysterious doers, absent of mechanical specifics, thefields of physics turn to more abstract and general mathematical and statistical, socalledphenomenological laws, such as those of thermodynamics and statisticalmechanics. The accounts of Feynman’s abstract and general thermodynamicdevelopment of conservation of energy as well as equilibrium thermodynamicsdiscussed previously serve as relevant examples. These abstract models havebeen found to capture the behavior common to diverse physical systems involving(often still unknown) differing physical mechanisms. Consistency of description,reliability, weighs in before predictive validity, which, with maturation of the researcharea, gradually becomes detailed mechanistic understanding with the eventual goalbeing derivation from the first principles of physics. The painful truth is that that inspite of evocative claims made to the contrary in the 1990-2000 Decade of theBrain, this level of understanding at the interface of neurobiological hardware andsoftware remains unbreached. Some recent attempts are interesting.One of the current research themes about real single neurons in real brains(in contrast with the silicon chip modules used in neural network computersimulations), involve widely distributed neurons that discharge in temporalsynchrony. These phenomena have been described by Max Planck’s Wolf Singer,Christoff Koch of California Institute of Technology and Florida Atlantic University’sSteven Bressler and others with words such as synchronization, phase locking,coherence and binding. Binding is an intuitively seductive word that premises thattwo, even widely spatially separated, brain regions that manifest neuronal signals of98activation locked together in time are assumed to be functionally integrated. Anothertime-dependent neuronal characteristic of current interest involve neurons orneuronal clusters that beat with almost strict periodicity, the oscillatory pacemakers.For example, the program of research by Professor Al Selverson at University ofCalifornia at San Diego, among others, has elucidated the role of these rhythmicpattern generators, both autonomous and those emerging from particular patternsof network connections. A wide variety of functional links involving neuronalpacemakers has been demonstrated. They range from the oscillatory transport ofcalcium through membrane channels in neurons and heart muscle, smooth muscleoscillations of the pylorus muscle of the stomach, the neuronal ganglion drivenchewing motions of the jaws of invertebrates and the retina-to-brain hypothalamiccells gating human circadian rhythms coupling our body’s hormonal clocks to lightcycles.Though regular rhythmicity in neuronal discharges is an intuitively attractiveidea and relatively easy to quantitate using simple sine wave trigonometrictransformations, in the real brain it is statistically rare. The commonest neuronaldischarge pattern observed is that of intermittent bursting, clusters of neuronaldischarges in time in which the inter-discharge intervals irregularly stretch andcontract like the bellow pleats of a syncopated accordion. Bursts of repeated firingof some unpredictable length followed by silences of equally mysterious durations.Their behavior can be represented as statistical measures using non-normal, longtailed distributions and in-between entropies described previously. For a wholehuman example, although the rhythm of manic depression is commonly thought toinvolve periodic cycles, careful study using motility patterns of the timing through lifeof these episodes of extreme mood states by Professor Allan Gottschalk at theUniversity of Pennsylvania and others have demonstrated an irregularly intermittentbursting pattern in manic-depressive episodes, getting more frequent with age.Neuronal inter-discharge intervals seldom demonstrate what is called a regressionto the mean like the normal distribution of heights, as one increases the number ofpeople measured, the tighter the distribution around the mean. Neurons, much likeour own irregular pattern of doing things (in spite of our plans), the statistical99distributions of neuronal interspike intervals have increasingly long tails. Contrary tothe behavior of a normally distributed observable, the larger the series of neuronalspike observed, the more likely that a longer interspike interval than had been seenbefore will occur. Counter-intuitively, long intervals tend to be followed by more longintervals as more shorts follow short intervals. Manic attacks cluster in time as doesa number of other brain and body diseases. Maybe it is intuitively obvious that badstuff tends to cause more bad stuff and good stuff is self-propagating. Havingsuffered recently does not mean fate owes you one. The brain’s syncopatedsegmentations of time can be translated into a creatively arrhythmic dance.What makes neurologizing conversations like these about subtle humanexperience possible are the human subjective scenarios we have agreed to shorthand with names of brain parts and neurochemicals. The how is where conceptualconnection is filled with post 19 th Century Spanish microscopic neuroanatomist,Santiago Ramon y Cajal-like, intuitions about the functional role of brain structures:we think motor automaticity and pacing when hearing the brain place names suchas caudate, putamen and cerebellum; we think limbic lobe when musing aboutsexuality, rage and depression; we short hand left versus right hemispheric placesfor verbal and sequential versus intuitive and geometric shape cognition; we point tothe frontal lobe for the future work of executive control, anticipation and paranoia;the hypothalamus for primitively expressed appetites and to the brain stem for ourvital functions such as breathing and blood pressure. With respect to the brainjuices, we say dopamine for aggressive activity, norepinephrine for attention andsensory discrimination and serotonin for hunger, mood and sexual inclination. Nomatter how avant guarde our experimental techniques such as monitoring localfunctional blood supply by fMRI, regional brain glucose utilization maps, timedependentchanges in skull surface voltage using a cap studded withelectroencephalographic, EEG, leads, monitoring these voltage field via theirtransverse magnetic fields by the frozen helmets of magnetoencephalography,MEG, we conclude our work by calling forth named but still enigmatic brain partsand their juices as mysteriously powerful little men and women executingremarkably complex and subtle tasks, sometimes even when called upon.100Current neurochemical research using molecular biological tools such asmice knockouts (the ablation of specific proteins though interference with theirnucleotide-mediated protein biosynthesis), for example, the production of animalsmissing a subunit of their hippocampal glutamate receptors associated with the lossof some memory functions, conclude the memorial mechanism to be a specificcellular region, such as hippocampal CA3 cells. Technology advances but continuesto support a primitive philosophic animism of named brain parts which pop scienceicons like the late Francis Crick called “The Amazing Hypothesis.” He and his fellowbrain philosophers implicate brain mechanisms such as the amygdaloidal nucleusman who can emotionally color even affectually neutral information that istransported through him. Imaging data showing amygdala man lighting up is used totell us that circulating sensory information through the differentially behavingamygdaloid nucleus is used for fight or flight interpretive significance. Emotionallyexpressive human faces light up inferior parietal cortex. The Iowa UniversityProfessors, the husband and wife Damasios, have located even the criminalpsychopath man in specific locations in the brain. As we have argued, perhaps adnausem, using multimillion-dollar imaging and molecular biological technology andno new thoughts that weren’t around during the era of the 19th Century’sneuroanatomists, specific brain regions continue to gain implicative properties likethe task-specialized gods of the Roman and Greek pantheons. Crick implied thatGod is a brain part.At the same time, those of us that have been in the brain business for awhile, recall skyscraper window washers, standing steady, high up on rope lashedplanks, suffering from congenital absence of the cerebellum, the supposed sine quanon brain part supporting motor coordination and balance in humans. Moregenerally, there is much evidence that if young enough and willing to work, many ofthe functions of missing parts of the brain can be taken on remarkably well by otherbrain parts thought not to be involved in these functions at all. In addition, sinceevidence of neuronal responding to loud noise or bright light perturbation can befound almost everywhere in the hyper-connected human brain, because anticipationand brain time inversions make before and after indicate little about human101neuropsychological causality, and inhibitory on or off and activating on or off are apriori functionally equivalent with respect to the logic gates of information encoding,transport or storage, the modern study of brain mechanisms in emotion, cognitionand behavior remains almost as mysterious as ever.* * *The only human mind-brain observations that are doubted consistently, andtreated as unpublishable by the editors of the journals of science, are those thatresult from direct human experience using subjective reports from within. They arecalled unscientific. Often ignored are logically consistent mathematical andcomputational contexts, which, as abstract and general tools of thinking andimagining, have the capacity to frame, rigorously define and describe thinking aboutboth the subjective and objective aspects of brain-generated phenomena. Thesemathematically configured metaphors can lead to consistencies in description, thisis behaving like that, in what are called equivalence relations expressed both asintuitive imagery; for a concrete example, a one holed bagel and one handled teacup are topologically equivalent because, sculpting in clay, they can be smoothlytransformed into each other. We have seen that invariant measures in computablestatistical flows can come out of a mess of data. Professor Paul Rapp of theUniversity of Pennsylvania has been able to mathematically encode the verbalcontent of the patient’s free associations and the therapist’s responses, using taperecordings of hours of psychoanalytical treatment. Examples of quantifiable qualitiesfound useful in this regard involve a variety of characteristic statistical patterns inwhat are called entropies and information as well as various measures of what witha wide range of definitions is called complexity. These quantifiable properties,measures, can help in the struggle with the intrinsic tension of Absolute Realitybetween the “eternal emptiness of form and the eternal form of emptiness.” Weresort to measures of entropy, information and complexity when confronted with ourignorance, “emptiness,” great or little, with respect to either cause or result, aboutwhat exactly is going on. Entropy in its forms relevant to information quantifies our102ignorance, the emptiness and its mystery. Computations of the entropy of systemsin motion convert questions and answers concerning the detailed workings of theleg’s neuromuscular machinery to global statistical descriptions of more abstractthematic motifs, forms, expressed in the dance. Patterns of behavior of theseproperties can suggest intuitive ideas and imagery about global mechanisms,approach/avoid, smooth/discrete, wild/tame, as well as correlated and objectivephysical observables.To learn more about this abstract, topology tinged (none numeric) style ofmodel building, we can go to school on a long studied physical example. It connectsa simple and well understood real world observable with abstract statistical patternsresulting from motions using the one-to-one correspondence (the equivalencerelation called isomorphism) between their entropies. As we have discussed, theStanford mathematician and Field’s Medal Winner, Donald Ornstein, proved that instatistical studies of even point-to-point unpredictable, chaotic systems, entropy isthe only isomorphism. The hardware of this physical example is what the statisticalphysicists call a dilute gas of some fixed number, n, of uniform hard spheres,moving scatterers, that, absent of dissipative friction, wander continuously around,changing their directions when bumping into each other. In a two dimensionalbounded arena of randomly rolling balls, this game has been called Sinai’s billiards.It was named for previously mentioned Ya Sinai, an eminent Russianmathematician He is now at Princeton and was previously a student of AndreiNikolaevic Kolmogorov, the Russian guru of many of the Twentieth Century’s worldclassRussian mathematicians. Kolmogorov axiomatized the field of probability and,more relevantly, initiated the theory of statistical descriptions, the ergodic theory, ofnonlinear dynamical systems. In the language of statistical physics, we will see thatthe same system produced by high number of elements executing Newton’sdeterministic laws can be generated by a so-called random system such as thatresulting from flipping a suitably biased coin. Our example can also serve as ametaphor, used extensively in the mathematical biology of the late Professor ArtWinfree, for the temporal features of life on a topological circle: the naturalirregularities of the recurrent beat of the heart, the in and out breathing of lungs, the103up and down voltage of brain waves, the pendulum swings of our blood hormonelevels, the cyclic procession of our days, months and years and at large scale, ourbody’s journey from dust to dust.The angular deviation theta, θ� �from the initial reference direction of a singlemoving sphere, gets rotated to a new angle theta, θ→ θ’ �by a collision with anothersphere. It has been shown that the new angle θ ’ is the previous angle, ��times twicethe average distance traveled between collisions called the mean free path, heresymbolized by delta, δ, divided by the diameter, D, of the sphere. Algebraically,θ ’ �=�2δ θ ��the new angle is equal to twice the mean free path divided by the diameterDof the spheres times the original directional angle of the sphere’s motion. �If wesymbolize the time between collisions with tau, τ, after an elapsed time ofexperimental observation, t, we can say that the deviations from the initial directionof the sphere changes like ( 2 δ � t/τ . The exponent, t/τ, represents the time of theDexperimental observation divided by the average time between collisions of thespheres, i.e. the time we’ve been watching, t, is expressed as units of inter-collisioninterval, τ. Of course, the circular deviation in the angle from the initial directionrotates repeatedly around a circle as the number of collisions increase. If a point ona circle marks the angular change resulting from each collision and the system runslong enough, it has been shown that the circle will eventually be completely coveredby points.An estimate of the entropy, S, being generated by each sphere labeled withsome index i, Si, is positive because the recurrent motion is deviating continuouslyfrom the initial direction. It can be computed for each sphere as the logarithm of theintercollision time-averaged deviation from the initial direction, S i = 1 log( 2 δ) and theτ Dentropy of the whole n hard sphere system is the sum of the n entropies, which canbe expressed as n× S i . If we keep books by registering the points when eachsphere’s ’ makes a stop on the top half of the sphere’s circle as 1 and the bottomhalf as 0 (and we must arbitrarily decide between 0 and 1 if it falls exactly on the104division between top and bottom and do so in a consistent way), then we can keepscore with a random looking binary series such as 11001001010…. that describesthe sequence of rotations. The advantage that accrues by doing so is that this coinflip counting eliminates details in favor of a computable over all measure andsupports several forms of entropy calculations for its use in deciding if this system isbehaving like that system, an equivalence relation. One can imagine a series of coinflips with 1 being heads and 0 being tails such that the statistics of a characteristicseries is determined by the fairness of the coin. As noted above, Donald Ornstein’sfamous theorem says that the entropy of these kinds of hardware and softwaresystems is the only general basis for finding correspondence betweencharacterizations of two such irregularly behaving systems. The important idea hereis that a series of 1’s and 0’s may not be identical but the two systems can beisomorphically equivalent with respect to their entropy.Notice again that the physical process of hard spheres bouncing off eachother on a flat surface has been captured by an abstract representation in binarynumbers that, like a series of coin flips, can be quantified as entropies (which wouldbe maximal for an ideal, fair coin). After describing the process of real numberrepresentation by the binary code, we will show how entropies can be computed forthese binary series. We remind ourselves that we are struggling to obtain some kindof knowing in a representative system manifesting the tension and mystery betweenemptiness and form.We can translate all finite real numbers into this language, making themaccessible to standard entropy computations. The following discussion of theprocess of transforming numbers into binary series is in the spirit of the famousnumber theory theorem that every natural number (the positive integers such as 1,2, 3, 4…) can be expressed as the sum of at most four squared numbers. Encodingany number by a series of 0’s or 1’s in what is called a binary transformation, beginswith its separation, called partition, into a sum of powers of 2, for example, 100 = 64(2 6 ) + 32 (2 5 ) + 4 (2 2 ). A short hand description of this sum begins with a formindicating the presence or absence of each successive power by a 1 or 0 comingbefore the relevant power of two; i.e. 100 = 1 × 2 6 + 1 × 2 5 + 0 × 2 4 + 0 × 2 3 + 1 ×1052 2 + 0 × 2 1 + 0 × 20 (in which the last term, arbitrarily, is 2 0 = 1, since anything tothe power 0 = 1). This can be written even more simply as a series of 0’s or 1’s,their presence indicating whether the power represented by each place in the left toright descending sequence of powers of two participates in the sum of the partition.It is in this way that in binary numbers, 100 = 110010. As another example, if wesimilarly partition the decimal number 729 = 512 (2 9 ) + 128 (2 7 ) + 64 (2 6 ) + 16 (2 4 ) +8 (2 3 ) + 1(2 0 ), we find that its binary transformation results in 729 = 1011011001,the 0’s representing the descending powers of two that are absent in the powers oftwo partition. One can compute the binary representations of lower valued numbersimmediately; for example, 4 = 1 × 2 2 + 0 × 2 1 + 0 × 2 0 so that there is a 1 in themultiply-the-power-of- two column and 0 the power 1 and power 0 columns so inbinary representation, 4 = 100. Similarly, 6 = 1 × 2 2 + 1 × 2 1 + 0 × 2 0 making thebinary transformation of 6 = 110.It was the co-inventor (with Isaac Newton) of the calculus, Gottfried WilhelmLeibniz, in about 1665, who fully developed the binary representation of all decimalnumbers. In a state of wonderment about the simplicity, power and completeness ofthis 1 and 0 encoding, he is said to have the beliefs that 0 symbolized theemptiness of the universe’s beginnings, 1 represented the complete fullness of Godand that this transformation served as metaphoric evidence consistent with God’screation of the universe out of nothing.The simplicity of binary expressions as in the dynamics of hard spheres orrotations on the circle as well as the transformations such as 729 = 1011011001make them propitious for exemplifying the methods for computing the entropies ofthe growth rate of the possible, called the topological entropy, H T , and the probable,the metric entropy, H M , which was introduced in a previous chapter called “SensualIn-Between Entropies.” The following exemplify the computations of measures oftopological and metric entropies, H T and H M , another computable idea calledalgorithmic complexity, AC and finally, the well known (to statisticians) standard runscore, src. Their descriptions have as their purpose a demonstration for the readerthat these apparently abstract, perhaps nebulous sounding, words can betransformed into well-defined, concrete, quantitative and computable form of reality.106If acceptance of this idea does not constitute a problem for the reader (and you donot find it fun to follow along with a computer math program and/or a pencil), thenthe following several paragraphs can be quickly scanned or skipped entirely.The computations of H T and H M begins with keeping track of how many 0 →1 and 1 → 0 transitions are found going from left to right in the binary series. Forexample, in the binary expression of 729, 1011011001, one starts counting with a1→ 0 transition followed by a 0 → 1 transition and then a 1 → 1 transition and soon. A useful way to record the count is via entries into a 2 × 2 matrix for scorekeeping in which the horizontal rows are labeled 0 on top and 1 below and thevertical columns are labeled 0 on the left and 1 on the right. The number of eachkind of transitions (from the vertical label to the horizontal label) are counted andsummed in the appropriate box of the two box by two box matrix; for examples: for a0 → 0 transition, a tally mark is entered in the upper left corner of the matrix; for a 0→1 transition, a tally mark is entered in the upper right corner; a 1→ 0 tally goes inthe left lower corner and a 1→ 1 is tallied in the right lower corner. The resultingtransition incidence counting matrix, M t for the 729 binary transformation serieslooks like M t = 1 3indicating one 0 → 0, three 0 → 1, three 1 → 0, and two 1 → 13 2transitions have been tallied. Although this series alone is too short for computingreliable statistical measures, if we assume that the pattern of transitions observed inthis short series is stationary, that is its transition behavior will remain the same ifthe binary series continued on to be infinite in length, the assumption being that thedynamics of now will be the same as always, 729 will stay 729, then we can use twoforms of this transition matrix in the computation of the topological entropy reflectingthe growth rate of the possible, HT, and the metric entropy from the statisticalweights of allowed choices among them, the probable, H M .To obtain the entropy representing the growth rate over time of the newpossibles, the computation of H T , the topological entropy, involves first transformingM t into an transition incidence matrix, M t,i a 0 or 1 matrix indicating whether eachbox has been entered at all (or not). Since in the binary representation of 729, all107four boxes of M t are occupied, the M t,i =1 11 1indicates that all four kinds oftransitions are possible. Since we remain in the context of a 0,1, two state system,the growth rate of the possible equals the logarithm, base two, of the sum of theentries in the boxes of the left-top-row to right-bottom-row diagonal called the traceand HT = log 2 (1 + 1) = log 2 (2) = 1. Consistent with intuition, since every transition ispossible, the topological entropy of M t as indicated in its M t,i is maximal (= 1).Another expression equal to the sum of the trace (the sum of the upper left to lowerright diagonal) in a square matrix, is its leading eigenvalue, most often symbolizedwith a lambda, λ 1 . The logarithm of the leading eigenvalue of the transitionincidence matrix is equal to its topological entropy. Symbolically, H T (M t,i ) = log 2 (λ 1 )= log 2 (2 ) = 1. Standard elementary linear algebra texts describe how to computeeigenvalues, these relations and related operations as well as their foundationaltheorems.Before computing the entropy of the distribution of probabilities among thepossibles as the metric entropy, H M , let us notice again that the occupancies in thefour entry boxes of the transition matrix M t are not uniform, M t =1 33 2. This leadsnaturally to the intuition that for this series of binary transitions, HM, in contrast withH T , will not be maximal, i.e. not equal to 1 and the nonuniformity of H T and H M is acomputational expression of what we mean by a state of in-between entropy. Theseentropies are identical and their difference = 0 for transitions reflecting maximalentropy, as might be realized in a very long series of fair coin flips in which theentropies = 1. Entropy will be minimal when flipping a two headed coin, here theentropies = 0. More compactly, the non-uniform probabilistic, metric entropy,differing from the maximal topological entropy indicates that the system is in adynamical state of in-between entropy, written as H T - H M ≠ 0.In the computation of the metric entropy, H M , the M t is transformed into atransition probability matrix, M t,p , called a Markov matrix named for one of the twogreat Russian mathematicians, both students of Pafnuti Lvovich Chebyshev, theMarkov brothers. The entries of each row in the M t are transformed into transition108probabilities, so that the sum of the decimal fraction parts of all the boxes in eachhorizontal row add up to 100%, or as a real number, 1.00. Recall that in theexample we’ve been using, the binary expansion of the natural number 729, the1 3transition incidence matrix is M t = and its Markov matrix is top row, 1/4, 3/43 2and bottom row 3/5 , 2/5, i.e. Mt,p =0.25 0.75. Matrix multiplication of Mt,p by itself0.60 0.40repeatedly is equivalent to tracking the temporal evolution of the transition matrix’sprobabilities until the resulting matrices move toward, converge onto, a steady state;each self matrix multiplication step represents what results from the passage of oneunit of time. The convergence to equilibrium values is continuous and gradual.When the steady state is reached, both rows become identical. For this example,M t,p × M t,p or M t,p 2 =0.5125 0.4875; M0.3900 0.6100t,p 4 =0.4527 0.5472; Mt,p 8 0.4445 0.5554= ;0.4377 0.5622 0.4443 0.5556Mt,p 16 =0.4444 0.55550.4444 0.5555which for the first four decimal places remain the same foradditional times of self multiplication. Note the convergence of the top and bottomrows to the same asymptotic values. Books discussing the multiplicative and otherbehavior of these nonnegative matrices are numerous and frequently appear inmatrix algebra texts under the rubric of the Frobenius-Perron theorems.Using the entropy formalism of Claude Shannon as developed previously, H Mis computed as the sum across either of the identical rows of each probability timesits logarithm, �ρ � �× log(ρ � �����ρ 2 × � �log(ρ 2 )) remembering from above that we are working inbase 2 logarithms and to change the minus sign (resulting from taking thelogarithms of decimal fractions) to plus: H M (M t,p ) = .4444 × log(.4444) + .5555 ×log(.5555) = .9911 The nonuniformity of the box occupancy probabilities is reflectedin the difference between the topological (maximal estimate) and metric (minimalestimate) entropies and is therefore quantifiable and computable: H T - H M ≠ 0 = 1.00- 0.9911 = 0. 0089. If the maximal and minimal estimates of the entropy were equaland all the probabilities boxes in each row asymptotically contained the same109probabilities as in M t =0.5 0.5, it would retain these values across an infinite0.5 0.5number of self multiplications such that HM = .5 × log(.5) + .5 × log(.5) = 1 and H T -H M = 1.00 – 1.00 = 0. 0.Complexity is a more general and variously defined descriptive expressionthan that of the topological and metric entropies and as such brings with it manykinds of definitions and computational approaches. One choice that’s intuitivelyappealing assumes that the relative complexity of an expression representing, sayan outcome of an observation or experiment, is reflected in the minimum length ofthe most compressed program (algorithm) from which, given a suitable dictionary ofsymbolic equivalencies, one can reconstitute the original expression. Increases inwhat some have called algorithmic complexity, AC, are reflected in the growth ofthis minimally descriptive symbol series length. Karen Selz’s approach tocompression and AC, similar to one proposed by Paul Rapp, involves theidentification and symbolic representation of repeated blocks of symbols calledwords. For example, given an arbitrary, exemplifying binary series:011011101010001010101001001010011, we first find the longest repeated word[1010100] and represent it with the symbol, a, yielding a shortening in the originalseries, 011011a010a1010011. The next longest repeated word is [011] is replacedwith b, yielding a further compression, bba010a1010b. The next remaining binaryword is of length equal to the previous one, [010], which, when replaced by c resultsin the series bbaca1cb. This can be further compressed to the final representationwith four symbols and for the sequentially repeated b, one exponent of degree two,b 2 aca1cb. From this representation and a dictionary of letter equivalent words, theoriginal binary expression can be recovered. For a quantitative index of thealgorithmic complexity, AC, of the compression, Selz computes the sum of thenumber of distinct symbols plus the sum of the natural logarithms of the exponents:4 + log (2) = 4.6931. The binary representation of 729, 1011011001, discussedabove, is compressed by making two [101]’s = a and two 0’s = b resulting in a 2 1b 2 1.Having three distinct symbols, a,b, and 1, and two exponents of two, its algorithmiccomplexity is equal to, AC = 3 + 2 × log(2) = 4.38.110In addition to H T , H M and AC, if computable in a meaningful way, thedeviation of the binary series under study from the idealized random behavior of afair coin could serve as another index of complexity. Common descriptions of theamount of randomness in a series are indices of run length If a run length is definedby number of elements in a series of the same symbol before it stops, counting thenumber of run boundaries by reading along the binary series and counting thenumber of switches from 0 →1 or 1 → 0, then the binary expression of 729,1011011001, has six runs. The great analytic probabilist, William Feller, amongmany others, including the distinguished 18 th Century Swiss family ofmathematicians, the Bernoulli’s, proved that computing a standard run score, srs,involves three terms, the theoretical expectation, E, of the number of runs, r, that isE(r), the number of runs actually observed, Obs(r) and the variance of theexpectation of the number of runs, Var( E(r). If the srs is less than zero, then thebinary series is more random than that resulting from the flipping of a fair coin.Interestingly, when a normal group of subjects are instructed to simulate what theythink of as a random coin flip determined series of 0’s and 1’s, their srs tends to belower than zero, over-estimating the degree of irregularity that randomnessrepresents. Long runs occur by chance far more often than intuition would dictate. Ifsrs is more than zero, than the binary, coin-flip series is more ordered than random.If srs equal to zero, the binary series is not discriminable from fair coin flippingrandomness.The expected number of runs, E(r), can be estimated by a fraction formed bytwice the product of the number of heads times tails divided by the sum of theheads and tails to which is added one. That is, E(r) = 2 × 6 × 4 + 1 = 5.8. The average6+4variation around this expectation called the variance, Var, of the expectation,Var(E(r)), is estimated by a fraction formed by (take a breath) twice the product ofthe number of heads times tails × twice the product of the number of heads timestails minus the number of heads and minus the number of tails, all over the productof the sum of the heads and tails squared, times the sum of the number of heads111(2× 6× 4)(2× 6× 4 −6−4)and tails minus one. That is, Var(E(r)) = = 2.03 . From these2(6 + 4) × (6 + 4 −1)three terms, we compute srs =Er () − Obsr () 5.8−6,0= =− 0.140 . We conclude thatVar( E( r) 2.03the standard run score of the binary series is less than zero and therefore morerandom than the expected random behavior of a fair coin.Recall from the last chapter that Karen Selz, Martin Paulus and others haveshown that various personality types and psychiatric diagnoses are associated withcharacteristic deviations of srs from zero. When the winners of the 2002 AnnualWorld Rock, Paper Scissors Championships held in Montreal Canada wereinterviewed, they said that sensing their opponent’s characteristic style of deviationsfrom randomness in what we would call the continuum from maximal to minimalentropy determined their successes. We characteristically use all of these measuresto estimate quantitate the deviation from randomness standard run score, srs,algorithmic complexity, AC, as well as H T and H M ,, the topological and metricentropies.* * *The encounter with mystical Absolute Reality, though sought by arduouscontemplative and other practice, emerges spontaneously, most often during timesof apparent mental emptiness, detachment, a state in which rationally instructivethought and the choral background of brain voiced, emotion-ladened, commentaryhave disappeared into the entropic soup of formless silence. It is this indescribable,ineffable, stillness that we think serves as the psychophysiological anlage ofmystical experience. The mathematical systems yielding quantitative metaphors,descriptive ideas about dynamical entropic statistical emptiness and form inspire theuse of mathematical structures in place of localized lumps in brain meat aspersonalized icons of doing.Our wedding of well-defined mathematical objects to metaphoric elements ofmore general nonverbal intuition has a long tradition. Rene Thom’s 1990 book,112Semiophysics, discusses mathematical mechanisms and their representations inmind and the real world, analogizing mathematical objects and the intuitions theygenerate to mechanical tools. Similar ideas are found among the four liberal arts ofthe ancients: Number, Geometry, Music and Cosmology. The epistemologies of allfour require, then and now, the intuitive use of mathematical objects, conscious orunconscious. Examples can be found in conceptual issues of Geometry andNumber with implications for relationships between man’s physical andpsychological worlds. One set of articulations were attributed to the shapes ofPlatonic solids found among the Neolithic stone circles in Aberdeenshire, Scotland,2000 years before Plato. Each symbolized particular physical and psychologicalthemes. All manifested equal edges and every face of each solid was the sameperfect polygon. The solid with four equilateral triangles manifesting four verticesand faces, the tetrahedron, represented the physical element, Fire, and thepersonal psychological climate of a choleric, fiery nature. A Platonic solid composedof eight equilateral triangular faces, two tetrahedrons annealed, the octahedron,signified Air in physical composition and optimistic hopefulness in psychologicaldisposition. Six square faces together making a cube, evoked the elementalphysical component, Earth, and its human expression as a phlegmatic, apatheticpersonal style. Twenty faces, all equilateral triangles, constitute an icosahedronindicating Water and a dominant feeling state of melancholic sadness. Likeonomatopoeic words and pictorial script, the three dimensional geometry of thesePlatonic solids feel like what they came to symbolize.The personality styles symbolized and evoked by the Platonic solids continueto be used to this day. For example, they compose the basic elements of theconstitutional categories of remedy in homeopathic medicine as introduced over200 years ago by Dr. Samuel Hahnemann in his classical Organon of the MedicalArt. The assignment of clinical remedy in homeopathic treatment combinesconsideration of the presenting physical symptoms and signs, the what, withintuitive discernment of the patient’s constitutional type, the who. To thehomeopathic physician, tetrahedral fire is suggested by the traits of personalmagnetism, courage and inspiration as well as egotism, strong desire and rage.113Octahedral Air people intellectualize objectively in confident and insensitivealoofness. Those symbolized by cubic Earth are realistic and practical, a what-yousee-is-what-there-isbelief along with rigid, materialistic ways. Icosahedral Watertypes experience emotions strongly and are sensitive, intuitive, nurturing and can beoverly sensitive and dependent.What intuitions and observations relevant to self, subjective and objective,emanate from the stylistic properties of feelings as derived from a time series ofobservations of their associated actions suggested by their statistical measures, H T ,H M , AC and srs? The yield is rich and unexpected. We find an enjoining of values ofthese measures, characteristic and invariant for each person, with the brain andbehavioral actions of entheogenic agents and Zen meditation in contrast withworldlier focused attitude adjusting experiences and drugs. The range of theirpotential values helps rationalize a person’s inclinations along the continuum ofattachment and detachment. This quantifiable dimension augers positively andnegatively with respect to the requirements for mystical experience as poeticallydescribed by the ambivalent warrior prince, Ardjuna, in conversations with LordKrishna in the Bhagavad-Gita, the most famous and influential component of theMahabharata of Hindu scripture, A similar theme relevant to the occupancy of apropitious range of values for the measures, H T , H M , AC and srs, is found in what isoften called the Second Nobel Truth as explained by the Buddha, SiddharthaGautama, in lectures recorded in a deer park near Benares. We begin with theresults of some drug experiments conducted by behavioral neurophysiologists andend with suggestions about the intuitive relevance of the conceptual content ofthese measures to the universals of mystical experience and perhaps to elementsof spiritual transformation.As described previously, the brain and behavioral process of habituation ischaracterized by a decrease in the strength of an observable response to therepetition of an evocative stimulus. Imagine the decrease in our startle respondingwhen a once unexpected loud noise continues to occur. Sir Charles Sherrington,the early Twentieth Century British pioneer in neurophysiology showed that animalsand humans gradually stopped the withdrawal of their limbs with stimulation of its114skin when it was repeated several times. Columbia University’s Nobelist in the brainsciences, Eric Kandel studied the neural mechanisms of habituation as a primitive,accessible and fundamental example of learning, the association of a nonresponseto a usually evocative stimulus, in Aplysia californica. The sea snails learned not torespond to a local irritation with a gill-withdrawal response when exposed to it manytimes. They learned to stop paying attention to the perturbation. The backgroundnoise appears to disappear after a little time in the Mall. Though his exploration ofits synaptic mechanisms involved the neural circuit of the gill-withdrawal reflex in themarine snail, its generality and human relevance is well established. Hundreds ofpapers can be found reporting the results of studies of habituation in normalhumans under all kinds of circumstances as well as in psychopathologicalconditions. That it samples something both fundamental and persistent is suggestedby studies in children by one of Kandel’s students, Michael Lewis. He found that therate of habituation of a startle response to a bright light in one-year-old humaninfants predicted success in many kinds of learning and other cognitive functionswhen the children were tested again at the age of four. Pavlov’s experimentsstudied habituation of the classically conditioned salivary response to meat powdercoupledbell sounds in dogs in which the bell was followed by nothing, not only ledto inhibition of the salivary response with unreinforced trial repetition butgeneralization of the inhibitory state such that dogs were observed to freeze inmotionless catatonic states for hours. In the language of our statistical measures,the fixation of the dog’s behavior would manifest minimal entropy in the form of H T =H M = 0 and the lowest complexity values for AC and srs. Entheogenic agents likeLSD or mescaline inhibit the process of habituation and fixation, maximizing theentropy of behavioral measures, H T , H M → 1 and high complexity values for AC andsrs.Mark Geyer and David Braff, Professors at the University of California in LaJolla and Michael Davis, a Professor at Yale’s School of Medicine, found thatentheogenic agents, such as mescaline and LSD, as well as naturally occurringindoleamines, such as DMT, which occurs naturally in human brain, preventedhabituation of startle responding in mammals. Each sound repetition was treated as115though it were new. The baby is Buddha is an Eastern philosophical aphorism thatcaptures the fresh spiritual state of each moment’s openness and readiness, the inbetweenentropies for new information surprise. Geyer and Martin Paulus found thatentheogenic agents such as Ecstasy also increased the complexity of the patternsof spontaneous motor movement made by rats exploring a bounded space. Recallthat they partitioned the floor to document the exploratory motion in the context of asequence of location transitions, readying the data for the computation of some ofthe measures previously described. Following the administration of entheogenicagents, the partitioning of the space that the animals were exploring, into a lattice ofdiscrete boxes and the encoding of each square with a symbol, the computableentropic and complexity measures such as H T , H M , AC and srs were increased. Incontrast, the administration of amphetamine-like stimulants led to a different kind ofbehavioral activation than that induced by entheogenic agents. The measures of H T ,H M , AC and srs reflected decreases in entropy and complexity. As University ofCalifornia’s David Segal and others documented in the 1960’s, high doses ofamphetamine led to animals into in a minimal entropic state, they were frozen instereotyped rocking, nodding and circling motions. High dose amphetamine-treatedhumans develop rigid fixation of ideas, low H T , H M , AC and srs, in man this is seenas inescapable obsession and paranoid delusion. There is considerable medicalevidence that Hitler took large doses of amphetamine (Benzedrine) daily for the last20 years of his life.The entheogenic drug-induced phenomena of naïve openness and absenceof fixation, states of high entropy and complexity, behavior generating higher thancontrol measures tending toward maximal values of H T , H M , AC and srs , aresubjectively reflected in the results of personal experiments of University ofChicago’s Heinrich Kluver as described in his Mescal and Mechanisms ofHallucinations (1966). Observing himself after the self administration of a crudepreparation of peyote cactus, he said that it led to glad feelings of unfamiliarity anda marked reduction in his tendency for boredom (habituation), a detachment fromold ways of thinking and a new openness to a rush of seen again for the first timeexperiences. Everything in his personal world, no matter how mundane, became a116source of new interest and fascination. New thoughts replaced old ideas in acontinuing process of new formulation. All of these things feel like they emergespontaneously, making ideas about being born again and personal renewalconcrete. We remember that Timothy Leary and his wife in their privately circulatedpamphlet, Neurologic, described their entheogenic drug-induced escape from thehabitual order as supported by the learned and established “…mental-manipulativeand socio-sexual brain circuits…,” an escape to a fresh new planet of possibilities.Louis Lewin, the early Twentieth Century German pioneering ethnopharmacologistdescribed his subjective responses to peyote as a flood of lively, numerous, randomfantastic creations of perception and thought, all demanding his fresh attention.To complement these subjective reports, experimental tasks involvinghabituation, such as the disappearance of a brain wave sign of arousal to sound orlight stimulation, called alpha blocking, the eyes-closed resting pattern of 8-14cycles per second, hz, waves perturbed into the arousal pattern of >20 hz, did nothabituate when the subjects were pretreated with entheogenic drugs. This findingwas also true for the results of years of meditative practice. In his 1974Psychophysiology of Zen, Hirai reported that Soto Zen monks, after many years ofpractice in mindful, one pointed, be here now meditation, unlike normal controls,continued to show alpha blocking surprise, brain wave arousal patterns, throughoutthe course of repeated stimulation with auditory clicks.James Austin in his monumental book, Zen and the Brain (2000) summarizesother studies of habituation in TM practitioners and other mediators in which eyesopen versus eyes closed, the set and setting and variations in other experimentalvariables blurred these results to some degree. He develops the case that years ofmeditation-induced brain states of emptiness, we would say of maximal entropy andminimal form, set the stage for the ecstatically insightful flood accompanying thesudden insight into a Zen koan’s solution or the transcendent startle induced by aroshi’s shout. A meditative struggle concerns how one can think about not thinking.That is, thinking of nothing. This is generally thought to be the most important partof Zen meditation, called zazen. Achieving high values for brain and behavioral H T ,H M , AC and srs supply the formless infrastructure for ecstatic transformation.117In healthy people, an awareness of self is not lost during this time of invasionby and fusion with what feels like an independent agency. At full force, the mysticalexperience is transfixing, tending to paralyze movement and speech, and at thesame time bringing with it the capacity for clear sensory and sensory-integrativelucidity. This new seeing brings previously unnoticed things to attention and makesold things new. Perhaps most striking is the passive (unsought) experience of theunification of erstwhile disparate, apparently unrelated thoughts and feelings. Theyield can be the sudden emergence of deep relationships between apparently verydifferent constructs, beliefs and formalisms leading to unanticipated and unsoughtintegrative connections. In mathematics, this experience can lead to entirely newkinds of theorems and proofs; in the physical and biological sciences, a previouslyunseen organization of the data generating new global relationships and potentialscientific laws. In our spiritual life, the ineffable richness of the direct experience ofGod.Mysticism-negative interpretations of these experiences have always beenattendant. To the extent that the mystic’s inward turn is seen as a detachment andimplicit derogation of the external, consensually real world, it is often seen asalienating from established institutions of religion and government. Psychoanalyticpractitioners may label it a regression to primary narcissism. Most churches tend todiscourage its practice as counter to the dominant social hierarchy and itsgovernance. Governments pass laws against its practice and manifestations, acurrent example being modern Chinese governmental reactions to the TibetanBuddhism of the Dalai Lama and the yogic practices of the Falon Gong. Agencies ofestablished society such as the institutions of licensed medical practice make thedominance of the inner world of mysticism subject to diagnoses ranging from thenarcissistic character disorders to interpretations of the reported extraordinaryexperiences as manifestations of schizophrenia, manic-depressive disorder ortemporal lobe epilepsy. Rejection and fear of the transcendent states lead touninformed and politicized anti-narcotic laws, grouping heroine and cocaine with theentheogenic (recall: engendering connection with the sacred within) agents such asthe Huichol Indian’s peyote and the Amazonian Indian’s yage, obstruct and socially118taint the personal use of plants and practices that facilitate access to the mysticway. Rational, socially responsible and otherwise kind and tolerant Presbyterians,Unitarians and Reformed Jews can be suspicious and rejecting of what appears tothem as the politically tinged mass hysteria of praying in tongues and other rituals ofCharismatic Christian rebirth and renewal or the ecstatic states of Orthodox Jewishchant-dancing.Modern brain and behavioral scientists, remaining under the philosophicalspell of logical positivism and its requirement for operational definitions and(external) experimental disconfirmability, operate from the position of strong doubtwhen mystical experience is addressed. What is striking and strange about howscience plays the game of mysticism research is exemplified by the publishableincrement in credibility concerning a meditation-induced change in state ofconsciousness when Boston University’s William Benson reported theaccompanying relaxation response, a sudden decrease in heart rate---much like thedive reflex of a seal or what the heart rate does when you duck your head suddenlyforward into a sink full of water. Decades are spent getting professorial tenure forresearch yielding things we have already experienced and know directly and forourselves. Recall that the existence of visual imagery in the human, doubted by anexperimental psychology of the time in which William James self-exploratoryobservations were viewed as revolutionary, was made more credible by evidencefor the existence of a subjective spatial metric: verbally reporting subjects, whentimed, took longer in their minds to go from one room to another one that was downthe hall then going to the room that was immediately next door.We use brain chemical, pharmacological, neurophysiological andneuroanatomical localization and computation of characteristic statistical patterns intime dependent brain and behavioral observations to the same end.Further Readings for SOME ENTHEOGENIC ENTROPIES119Phantastica: A Classic Survey on the Use and Abuse of Mind-Altering Plants. LouisLewin, Park Street Press, Rochester, Vermont, 1998 (First published in 1924)Indole(ethyl)amine N-methyltransferase in the human brain. M. Morgan (Poth) andA. J. Mandell, Science 165:492-493, 1969Enzymatic formation of tetrahydro-beta-barboline from tryptamine and 5-methltetrahydrofolic acid in rat brain fractions. L.L Hus and A.J. Mandell, J.Neurochemistry 24:631-636The Sacred and Profane, The Nature of Relgion. Mircea Eliade, Harvest Books,Harcourt, San Diego, 1957Hashish and Mental Illness. J. J. Moreau, Raven Press, N.Y. 1973 (First publishedin 1848)The Neurochemistry of Religious Insight and Ecstacy, A.J. Mandell in Art of theHuichol Indians, Fine Arts Museum of San Francisco, Abrams, N.Y. 1978Altered States of Consciousness: A Book of Readings. Charles T. Tart, John Wiley,N.Y. 1969Soul; God, Self and the New Cosmology. A. Tilby, Doubleday, N.Y. 1992Pihkal: A Chemical Love Story. Alexander Shulgin and Ann Shulgin, TransformPress, Berkeley, CA 1991Psychochemial Research Strategies in Man, A. J. Mandell and M.P. Mandell,Academic Press, N.Y. 1969120The Biology of Transcendence, J. C. Pierce, Park Street Press, Rochester,Vermont, 2002Psychiatry and Mysticism, S.R. Dean, Nelson-Hall, Chicago, 1975Zen and the Brain, James H. Austin, MIT Press, Boston, 2000Perspectives in Biological Dynamics and Theoretical Medicine. Eds. S.H. Koslow,A.J. Mandell and M.F. Shlesinger, Ann. N. Y. Acad of Sci. Volume 504, 1987Consciousness and the binding problem, W. Singer, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 929:123-146.Mixing properties in Human Behavioral Style, Karen A. Selz, U.M.I., Ann Arbor, MI.1992Dynamical Systems and Ergodic Theory, M. Pollicott and M. Yuri, LondonMathematical Society, 1998.Introduction to the Modern Theory of Dynamical Systems, A. Katok and B.Hasselblatt, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995121CHAPTER 6:PENTECOSTAL PHASE TRANSITIONSBy their late teens, my two offspring, sons of an Alcohol Anonymous, bornagain, originally Christian Science mother and a spiritually struggling and mostlysecular Jewish psychiatrist father, had been unfulfilled in their hungry search for theexperience of a personally meaningful God. After years of perhaps too academicconversations with their parents, visits to a variety of houses of worship, talks withUniversity of California religion professors and evenings with a Ph.D. psychologistrabbiand friends at the neighborhood synagogue, they turned somewhere else.Some of their high school friends who were Evangelical Christians took them totheir Assembly of God, Pentecostal and other Christian, direct experience of God,churches. They came to love what they sometimes called their Wednesday nightand Sunday morning “rock and roll,” services.Struggling with the post-Vietnam cynical mistrust of authority and themarijuana apathetic nihilism of the 60’s and 70’s, and clearly not enticed by whatthey regarded as their father’s vacuous mélange of New Age Eastern Religions andsecular brain science, they spoke about their sudden and life-changing experiences.They studied, memorized and quoted the Scriptures as part of their commitment totheir word churches. As erstwhile cynical teenagers, now positive and brimming withfaith, I secretly called it denial, they described what was happening to them as New122Birth. They told me that, paraphrasing Paul in Romans, they had been saved andwere living New Life, not earned by good works as in Hebraic Law, but by faiththrough God’s Grace. Jesus had “paid their bills” through His sacrifice atGethsemane. They both tried to explain inexplicable feelings of new energy, theunseen hand of spiritual guidance and peace. One told me that the wind of the HolyGhost had taken him to the front of the pulpit, tearfully, thankfully, on his knees, toaccept Jesus as his personal Savior. They described how they had opened theirlives to the spiritual strength of living in Jesus.Many things about them changed: their tastes in food, from hamburgers tovegetables and fruit; from the jazz of John Coltrane and McCoy Tyner and thecynicism of Frank Zappa’s “…only fourteen and knows how to nasty…,” to playingstrum guitar and singing the hymns of Wednesday night healing services; from t-shirts hanging out of raggedy, Southern California, boutique store purchased,stressed jeans, to polished dark shoes, starched white shirts and gray or tan khakislacks, sometimes with ties. They became cool, respectful, rational and moredistant with me. They repeated often the scriptural story about young Jesus,accidentally separated from his parents on a visit to Jerusalem. When by standersasked Him about where His parents were, He answered, “I have no mother andfather.” They told me that they, like God’s son Jesus, were filled to completenesswith the Father and the Holy Ghost.On one hand, their experiences sounded like those of the activated mindstate of Abraham Abulafia, a suddenly emergent Nevesh and my father’smetaphysical talks about personal transformation. My personal secularcomputationalbrain God spoke to me of the mechanisms of sudden personalitychange, a phase transition in complex systems, in the context of the nonlineardynamics of brain and behavior. On the other hand, their global changes in mind feltboth alien and threatening. When I came to learn their churches’ full list ofexpectations, rules, requirements and sociopolitical policies, I found that I could notidentify with this system of spiritual knowing at all. It felt rigid, righteous, unforgiving,even angry, and it frightened me. I never anticipated that my culturally enriched,intellectually sophisticated sons would be quoting Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell.123The Freudian psychoanalyst of my younger days tried to write off these (to me)cataclysmic changes as manifestations of male sons’ unconscious oedipal strivingsto father kill and thus become. After some mulling, my theory did not wash.They spent time accompanying themselves on guitars, singing hymns andshouted Corinthian Paulisms to small curious crowds gathered in beach parkinglots, city parks and inner city street corners of Southern California. They passed outpamphlets containing New Testament tracts and formulaic aphorisms promising thepost-repentance blessings of Jesus. The eldest, articulate, bright and prematurelyworldly, had been an ardent memorizer and appreciator of Shakespeare, especiallythe mystical Tempest, the music of Aaron Copeland and Igor Stravinsky, theimprovisations of Charlie Parker and Cannon Ball Adderley and the provocativeliterature of the time including Jack Kerouc’s On the Road and Hunter Thompson’sFear and Loathing in Las Vegas. They loved riffing with the Voltairean pungency ofFrank Zappa’s lyrics. Now, nihilistic humor had become an anathema.Several weeks after my eldest son’s transformation, I found him in thegarage using a hammer and an empty barrel for disposal as he destroyed hismodern jazz and early rock record collection. He ridded himself of all of his fictionand most of the nonfiction books in his young but relatively large personal library.His new energy and high purpose emerged as a clearly defined set of rules ofbehavior, a strong stand against abortion, frequent talk about the need to escapefrom the contaminating influence of MTV culture, as well as our years of talk aboutthe biological and physical sciences. Both boys were particularly critical of myDarwinian flavored attempts at scientific explanation of man’s inner life using theselective and adaptive neurobiology of brain mechanisms and behavior. They spentincreasing amounts of time with Church friends, seldom seeing their old ones. Theeldest’s college goals turned from plans for a U.C. Berkeley equipped career inliterature and creative writing to a none spiritually challenging, objective andpractical, Christian free market finance and accounting degree from U.C.’s BusinessSchool.Gone were shared magical hours of intellectually stimulating, humorous,even scholarly discussions. In place of evidential talk in areas of philosophy,124literature and science, their opinions and claims derived exclusively from biblicalquotation. Their particularly favorites were Paul’s letters and some of the laterprophets, particularly Jesus-auguring Isaiah. “In the beginning was the word…”became the real reality. The meaning of life was Scripture as explicated by theirbook church pastors. They scribbled notes in the margins of their Bible pagesduring sermons They were displeased when I interpreted the wild imagery and 666symbolism of Revelations from the point of view of the historicity of encoded politicalmessages, meanings hidden for the safety of the early Jews in their world of Greco-Roman governance. Twenty-five years, before the glut of books by Tim LaHaye, mywell-educated sons claimed that Revelations was literal and foretold the comingtribulation that augured the end of the world and ascension to heaven of thebelievers. My youngest, since childhood a well-read history buff, now viewed NewTestament scripture as sui generisly, divinely and literally true. They said theconduct of their lives their meaning had been clarified by the biblical truths revealedto them by The Book. What I did not say was that much of the talk seemed to me tobe an intellectually and spiritually impoverished miasma of cant and righteousness.At the same time, their remarkable transformation appeared to be the expression ofa powerful and mystical force, the scientific understanding of which has been theostensible focus my life’s work. Why did their alterations appear so alien, strangeand forbidding?Born to a home of psychoanalytically and scientifically oriented politicalliberals, these precociously bright and worldly sophisticated young men weresuddenly transformed into, unrecognizable to me, radical ChristianFundamentalists. They are now in their late thirties and remain just as ardent,Christian patriotic, Right Wing voters to this day. The eldest is now an executive inMorris Cerullo’s San Diego based, worldwide missionary movement, raising moneyfor revival and media ministries. He travels to and is involved with hundreds ofFundamentalist Christian churches in countries ranging from Argentina and Africa tothe Middle East and Russia. He hasn’t allow me to contact his children, mygrandson and granddaughter, because, in vague talk and mostly silent implication, Iand people like me are seen as sources of potentially satanic, worldly125contamination. He feels wronged by the way I am. He once chided me about whathe saw as my futile spiritual search in what he called the “health food” Eastern andbrain religions. My youngest, only a little less ardent and critical, visits occasionally,and, hands in the air and speaking in tongues, prays to the Lord for my salvation.Of course, this sudden and long lasting personal transformation in thedirection of Fundamentalism is well known and almost commonplace in modernAmerican and European Jewish, Christian and Moslem college educated middleclass families. The Saudi Arabian World Trade Center bombers were, mostly, wellsupported children of the educated middle class We recall the famously tragicAmerican radical Moslem, Richard Reid, the would be airplane shoe bomber. Mystomach clenched as I heard Richard’s sophisticated and obviously caring fathershare his confusion and struggle to rationalize what had happened to his son. Thecommonality of this kind of spiritual and life transformations in the educated youngmakes each event no less painful. On the other hand, we know that healingtransformations in the name and spirit of the Christian God can lead to quite positiverealities. They are effective in even quasi-secular disguise as in Alcoholics andNarcotics Anonymous, Synanon and in the rehabilitation of the CharismaticChristian, ex-alcoholic, Southern Methodist politician, George W. Bush.Paul Holmer, Professor of Theology at Yale Divinity School gives thanks tothe evangelicals who “…keep alive the radical breach that the gospel is from thenous of this world…they (Fundamentalists, Evangelicals) look marginal if you arechurchy…intolerant if you are ecumenical…anti-intellectual if you are trying tosystematize… in their roughness and …abrasiveness.” I bring personal and painfulwitness to these claims. To get to the personal meaning and mechanisms of thesetransformations, I had to start from somewhere. I am wedded to the belief of theJewish ecstatic, Abraham Abulafia, and not those of Moses Maimonides, that thehuman mind in an altered state of activated intellect, man’s Nevesh, can understandsuch mystical happenings. I would continue to work at it.One of the early personal church experiences with my sons’ religious pathcame after accepting an invitation to go with them to a Sunday service at theircurrent charismatic church. By then, the eldest was married with children, the126youngest, unmarried, was teaching bilingual mathematics in high school. I hadwaited several years for this occasion.. The meeting took place in a large, gray,unmarked warehouse building that was crowded in back with high stacks of storagecartons. The large, cement floored, open space in front of the storage boxes wasoccupied by rows of metal folding chairs. They faced an unadorned, elevatedwooden platform upon which was a lectern and microphone. Behind the lecternstood a casual array of a dozen or so young people, singing hymns and playing avariety of instruments. These included piano, two or three guitars and upright bass,tenor saxophone, trombone, trumpet, mouth organ and two snare drums. Soundinga bit like a Salivation Army Band, they played and sang, “They cast their nets inGalilee just off the hills of brown; such happy simple fisher folk, before the Lordcame down…the peace of God, it is no peace, but strife closed in the sod. Yet let uspray for but one thing, the marvelous peace of God.”The building, used for commercial storage, packaging and mass mailingsduring the week and a Charismatic Christian word church on Sunday, was locatedat the rear of an unfinished strip mall. A new and well-polished yellow CadillacDeville was the only vehicle parked in the no parking zone immediately in front ofthe entrance to the warehouse. My youngest explained that the car belonged to CarlAustin, the self-discovered and declared pastor, who spontaneously rose up to leadwithout academic religious training or a conventional ordination. The bright yellowcar was explained as evidence of the power of God. Paraphrasing Mark, my sontold me “…he who does not doubt in his heart and believes that those things hesays will come to pass, he will have whatever he says…whatever things you ask forwhen you pray, believe that you receive them, and you will have them.” The carserved as a glorious instantiation of the church’s major promise of the rewards offaith.Pastor Carl Austin, a tall, blonde, portly man in his early thirties with aresonant tenor voice, was the youngest of several children of a poor Midwest farmfamily. He had been a state college drop out and without a career or a job. Hissermons contained stories about how he had caught spiritual fire at a revivalmeeting conducted by Kenneth Hagin of Kenneth Hagin Ministries, aka Rhema127Bible Church, Tulsa, Oklahoma. The pastor’s witness of the Holy Ghost actingthrough his life was his personal cure, by transformative Grace, of a triad of selfdestructivelysinful addictions: alcohol, gambling and promiscuity. Self-chosen andself-declared, he now served this two and a half year old growing congregation ofover 200, mostly young, working families. The young men in attendance at thewarehouse church were in shirts and ties, very unlike the more casual garments ofeven dressy occasions in Southern California at that time. Women were dressedsimply and modestly. Most of the children were in Sunday school in a smallneighboring store in the strip mall during the adult service. The few thataccompanied their parents were remarkably well behaved I was told that mostfamilies tithed 10% of their income. They quoted Hebrews, “…king of therighteous…to whom also Abraham gave a tenth part of all….” They believed thattheir tithe would be returned manifold and the yellow Cadillac Deville served asPastor Carl Austin’s personal evidence. From these funds, the congregationsupported the pastor, his car, the rental expenses of the Sunday warehouse churchand an orphanage in a small Mexican border town. Some of these children, severalneurologically disabled, were bussed to the Sunday service for healing. They sattogether in a section in the front of the congregation and were the beneficiaries ofthe second Sunday collection plate, passed around after the first one that wasdesignated for the church and its pastor.The first Sunday sermon I heard in the warehouse followed several awkwardminutes of Pastor-directed warm up hugs of neighboring strangers while the choirsang hymns. The songs were accompanied by instruments playing the melody inunison sans harmony, and accented by the beats of two loud drums. As the volumeand pace of singing increased, I saw several episodes of ecstatic looks and fainting,dying in the Lord and shouts of praise with upraised hands. The intermittentelevation of the hands during prayer and song appeared to be spontaneous. I wastold that the arms were up as antennae, feeling the energy of Lord all around us.The pastor’s topic was forgiveness. From Ephesians, “…let all bitterness, wrath,anger, clamor, and evil speaking be put away from you, along with all malice… bekind to one another, tender hearted, forgiving one another, just as God in Christ128also forgave you.” In the middle of his sermon, which built slowly in tension andvolume, the pastor introduced a forty-ish, sparkly eyed, somewhat overweight, darkhaired, slightly made up woman who the Pastor said was a witness for the ultimatein Christian forgiveness. She was someone from whom all of us could learn. Shewas the mother of the 7-year-old boy that he, the Pastor, had, four years before,accidentally killed during a drunken driving episode in his “other life.” That was theone he was living before he was saved. I was told that he presented her in a serviceat least once a year. The woman said that her successful struggle for forgivenessled to her being saved. She quoted Ephesians, ”And you who were dead intrespasses and sins hath he quickened.” She looked radiant and hugged the pastor.When my sons introduced me to him as we filed out at the end of the service, thepastor told me that my visit was important to the congregation. He told me that Jewswere special in Charismatic Christianity since we would play an important role in thereturn. He said he hoped he would see more of me. My boys seemed pleased tohave invited me.I accompanied them to their church most Sundays, and often for what theycalled the “rock and role healing services” on Wednesday night, for over two years.Within three or four months I found myself, the first time while awakening out of adeep sleep, mumbling sounds that I was told sounded like some unknownlanguage, I was praying in tongues. At some services it happened spontaneouslyaccompanied by an almost ecstatic feeling accompanying the surrender of willfulcontrol. This was usually accompanied by the release of new energy. I recallthinking that the spontaneous, nonsensical linguistics shorted out my verbal andobsessionally logical left brain allowing the unbridled expression of my hystericalright brain. Sometimes in agreement with an insight offered in a sermon or whenparticularly moved by a hymn, I found my hands lifting skyward, right hand and armhigher than left, with a high feeling of trust and delicious surrender of consciouscognitive control.Reading the New Testament’s Acts, I learned that we were re-enacting thescene of the Apostles in the upper room. Those gathered there were the oneschosen by the risen Jesus to be able to see Him, the list including Peter, James,129John, Andrew, Philip, Thomas, Bartholomew, Matthew, James, Simon and Judas.“…they were all filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak with other tongues, asthe Spirit gave them utterance…” The secular psychoanalyst in me tried to make ananalogy with the joyful jazz lyrics of Ella Fitzgerald’s scat singing, I’d done a little ofthat during my small jazz group pianistics as an a adolescent. I thought about howverbally paralyzed stutterers could be articulate when singing what they mean whenthey could not talk it. I wondered about the relevance of the spontaneous poetry ofslams and Hip Hop rapping. We attended what my sons called charismatic blackBaptist churches in South Los Angeles and Long Beach. These often four hourservices usually featured two wonderfully harmonic echoing choirs with organ anddrum punctuation of the speech-singing, sermonizing Reverend. Large andbeautifully dressed black women sang operatically and danced gracefully down theaisles. I joined my sons in this joyful noise for these long services and, exhausted, Iwas forced to go home for a Sunday afternoon nap.In spite of what could be regarded as validating experiences with the real lifeHoly Spirit, I continued to be generally confused and even more deeply estranged.An inner voice kept recalling my spiritual failure as a parent and being traitorous tomy Jewish ethnic identity by Christian church attendance. I tried to understand howmy sons had traveled from where I thought we were living together to this entirelynew world. How did it happen? Could the path going there and back bemeaningfully reconstructed and then reversed? This idea is consistent with themedical dictum that knowing the cause, the treatment logical follows. My educationhad shown me such assumptions of reversibility need not be true.Contrary to the beliefs of early physical mechanics, medical psychiatrichistory takers and psychoanalysts reconstructing childhood events, the modernphysics and mathematics of complex systems says phase transitions in complexsystems are probably not reversible, at least not simply so. One of the features ofglobal changes in complex systems, often called bifurcations or phase transitions(think heated water going suddenly to a boil), is their dramatic discontinuities inbehavior. Knowing only the initial and end state, phase transitions in complexsystems do not allow for point-to-point backtracking or specific linear-causal130understanding. These discontinuous and global transformations are the stuff ofmiracles, especially for physicists. Even with respect to initial and end-states, ratherthan using straight forward phenomenological observation, the mathematical andphysical theories of phase transitions are usually dependent on not necessarilyintuitive, derivative physical quantities. Their verbal representations are often notconcrete but metaphoric. This retreat to derived and abstract, far from the primarydata computables, may be more evidence of man’s many insufficiencies inunderstanding of the mysteries that are often placed in the spiritual realm.* * *Driven by an effect that contributes to cause, like the faith-drivenabandonment to God that generates more faith, a drop of water hanging from afaucet is pulled down by its own gravitational field as the thinning neck of the dropfacilitates its own further thinning. A gobbet connected by a thick neck to the maindrop begins to separate. The neck between them thins and breaks, and onebecomes suddenly and irreversibly two. A continuous structure has suddenlybecome discontinuous in finite time at what is called a singularity. Since the singlemeasurable feature that dominates the water’s behavior around this singularity isthe diameter of the thinning neck, a derivative physical, one-dimensionalobservable, neither the details about where it all began (called the initial conditions)nor the path it followed to get to the moment of fracture, are predictively relevantwith respect to the sudden transition. Considering this kind of phenomenon going onin our brains, choosing between theories of behavior that involve changes in braincell groups and/or brain chemicals versus those that involve behavioral quantities,may be neither possible nor necessary. The challenge is to place the problems ofcataclysmic change in brain and behavior in sufficiently abstract and universal termsthat can be represented in some low dimensional, computationally accessible spaceof variables.The simplification and stereotypy of behavior around singularities reduce thenumber of features that are required to discuss the dynamics of change in what131would otherwise be a complicated beyond reach situation. One of the propertiesfound around singularities, is the loss of absoluteness in contextual characteristicssuch as the scale of the observation. We no longer can say that what we arestudying happens in inches or miles, in seconds or days, now or in the past. In theplace of a single unit of relevant measurement, we have a distribution of spatial andtemporal feature sizes that stretch toward both the infinitely small and the infinitelylarge.We can illustrate a dynamical transition involving the passage of the systemthrough a singularity by using the metaphor of another kind of water experiment. Ifwe pour a small amount of water through a filter full of coffee grounds, or watch ourcoffee maker do it, the first spurt of water makes an incomplete path of wet groundsin the bed of dry ones. The next bit of water soaks this path more thoroughly andmay form additional and multiple, new and branching, incompletely penetratingpaths. Eventually, on just one more of these pourings, a connection in the pathsoccur, such that the water snakes all the way through the coffee grounds and thefirst brown drop of coffee falls into the pot. At this flow singularity and opposite tothe dynamic of a faucet water drop, a discontinuous system of pathways becomescontinuous in finite time in a process called percolation,Trying to set up a predictive model, we can count the number of waterdeliveries that occur before the first drop finds its way through. Repeating theexperiment many times yields a span of the number of pours required to reach thesingular point of percolation. If we do the experiment enough times, the distributionof the number of pours required to reach percolation will range from one towardinfinite. In the neighborhood of the transition, time as recorded as the number ofsmall pouring events may stretch.In aa comparable system, as elegantly described by Detrich Stauffer in hisSpringer-Verlag book on percolation, multiple hot spots in the woods can suddenlyfuse into a forest fire. Isaiah said, “…glorify the Lord in the growing fires of dawn…”Faith fires spreading through a faithless dense forest, its hot irregular front dampedby the disbelief of water-filled leaves, or disillusionment gaps of already burned outtrees, can, under the right motivating conditions of dryness, wind velocity, tree132density, kindling temperature and desperation-induced willing of faith, sweepthrough the entire woods in a sudden blaze. This is the spirit of percolation.Computer simulations of percolating blazes generate a multiplicity of life times offorest fires near the singularity that represents the transition to a globalconflagration.Mentioned previously is Rudolf Otto’s 1917 book about the characteristics ofreligious experience, Das Heilige, The Sacred, which described phases in thediscontinuous transition from everyday life to the wholly other (ganz andere) realityof the world of the sacred. They include intense, numinous experiences of fearsomeambiguity, dawning awareness of awesome mystery, revelation and appreciation ofthe majestic power and finally, entrance into a reality of an entirely other place andtime than the natural and secular which Mircea Eliade called profane. In his 1958book, Patterns in Comparative Religions, this well-known historian of religion calledthe revelatory occurrence of sacred reality an hierophany. Eliade’s classic work,The Sacred and the Profane, contrasts the homogenous, spiritually formless andrelative world of the profane with the results of passage through spatial andtemporal singularities to a place and time that are not of this world.Poincaré said that the brain did not know of absolute space, but ratherestablished a model of it through internal reconstructions of sequential sensoryexperiences that accompanied our exploratory movements. Activity generates theinternalized, partial differential, equations (describing changes in the observablewith motions in space) required for representing the dynamical cartography of theworld. It was Poincaré’s habit to topologize the dynamics of motion in mathematicalproblems that lacked analytic solutions. In this way, simple algebraic operationsreplace some of the insoluble problems of the calculus. Eliade’s sacred spacedefining singularity in the plane that breaks profane homogeneousness, a centerpoint that is no longer a circle, can be viewed also as Poincaré’s topological center.His topological brain theory found expression in the formal representation of internalspace as the invariant product of an organism’s displacement groups of imagined orreal physical movements around such singular fixed points. The operational objectcalled groups defines this kind of algebraic, mathematical structure and motion.133
associated with the loss of habitual temporal-spatial contextual moorings. A mind attime one and the same mind at time two are unconnected. They are wholly other.In much the same sense, for Eliade, sacred time, like space, is neitherhomogenous nor linearly continuous. Sacred time is circular, recoverable andreversible. Past, primordial, mythical time can exist in the present. Religiousfestivals are recurrently ontological, allowing the recovery of the sacred time suchthat their past and present expressions are the same. Rebirth is new birth. In thelanguage of the North American Indian Tribe, the Yokuts, the term for world(cosmos) and year are the same. A year and the world has gone by, only to startagain. The Dakota Tribe says that the Year goes around the World. As Elaide hassaid, “…at each New Year…the world (is) recreated and to do this is also to createtime…the sick man becomes well because he begins life again with its sum of theenergy intact.” Healing by becoming another or renewed self may become a frontierscience in the yet unexplored field of phase transition medicine.The quality of separateness, discontinuity in states, as occurs in the samedifferentinside world, is much like that found in the stages of anesthesia. Eachstage of anesthesia is ganz andere from the others. In Stage I anesthesia, fastfrequency, low voltage brain waves are observed and accompanied by a twoMartini-like, mildly activated, sedated but exhilarated high. Stage II, the next deeperstage of anesthesia, is marked by the sudden emergence of intermittent bursts ofhigh amplitude brain waves, and animals and man demonstrate bizarre postures,hallucinatory phenomena, fixed staring, and sometimes movements that look likeacting out some symbolic drama. This stage marks the beginnings of the loss ofresponsiveness to painful stimuli. In the sudden drop into Stage III, a low voltagemix of mostly slow and some fast brain waves can be seen associated withdepressed consciousness, complete insensitivity to pain, slow regular respirationand an unexcitable cardiovascular system. Stage IV is the deepest stage ofanesthesia. This state is characterized by very low voltage, almost flat brain waves,a loss of spontaneous breathing, the collapse of blood pressure and, finally, cardiacirregularities and death in cardiac arrest. These are both discontinuous and globalbrain state phase transitions.135
primary process by Freud and his followers. This forgotten language of theunconscious, an archaic needs and fear-driven tongue lurking beneath oursupposedly objective discourse, comes to dominate themes of communication inthe middle of these unfinished spiritual transitions. The Rorschach Test of mastermeditaters and LSD users overflow with conflictual primary process images, asdoes the talk of patients on the verge of schizophrenic decompensation. Theprimitive symbolism of primary process provides the major current in the overwrittenprose of the hyper-religious temporal lobe limbic epileptics described previously andcalled the Geschwind Syndrome and in the regressed and iconic transferenceconcerns of patients with tendencies for global and sudden phase transitions,prostitute to saint, righteous obsessional to conscienceless psychopath, calledborderline personality disorder.Primary process represents a dynamical brain state, one unburdened bylinearly predictive connections with reality. It is a state without even a transientsingle defining physical time or other fixed measure of order. It is without the causallogic or knowledge of an outside reality that a brain implies in supposing to know. Itsprimitively instinctual style and goals contrast with more physically time-locked,reality oriented thinking which Freud called secondary process and Penn-Lewisreferred to as ordinary and religiously lawful “reasoning faculties.”An absence of absolute time and space scales with which the executive egoorders internal and external time and events, and therefore their relations, results inprimary process thinking characterized by condensations of several, oftenincompatible, representations into one. Dueling, conflictual and simultaneousfeelings and thoughts float from their relevant objects to others. In the transitionaltranscendent state, there may be confusion of self with others, of objects with theirlabels, of parts with the whole and of symbols with the things that they symbolize.This facilitates living in the spirits of the Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost at thesame time. Mixed inextricably with saintly awareness and charisma, there aresignatures of instinctually driven and configured primary process. Freud’s classicalwork on slips of the tongue concerned the intrusion of these instinctual thoughtstream condensations from the world of the ganz andere and displacements into138everyday life. In this intense and quasi-fluid state, saintly priests slip seamlessly intosexual predation; an ecstatic Jewish Orthodox fundamentalist shoots 29 prayingMoslems in a cave near Abraham’s burial plot for Sarah in Hebron; what werelovingly mystical, Jelaluddin Rumi’s Afghanistan (Balkh) descendents becomepeople bashing and women stoning morality police; committed and mesmerizingChristian televangelists attend peep shows and seek child pornography; devotedIslamists crash airplanes into tall New York buildings.In the physics of condensed matter, two common forms of multi-molecular orpolyatomic cooperative arrangements are the crystalline condition and in someways its opposite, the amorphous glassy state that results from rapid coolingthrough a melting temperature. The microscopic atomic arrangement in glasses, incontrast with the crystalline state, exhibits no spatial periodicity or long-range order.In contrast with fluids, the friction of passage of molecular elements of glasses pasteach other, their shear viscosity, is large enough such that their macroscopicshapes are maintained in the very slow flow for very long times. In-between thecrystalline and glassy states their exists a multiplicity of possible unstablearrangements which result from what physicists call frustration, the inability of asystem to find a unique, lowest energy, ground state. The generic example of aferromagnetic crystal has two types of ordering principles: (1) The mutual alignmentof the atomic magnetic moments, visualizable as the lining up of dipole, positive tonegative, magnetic arrows; (2) The geometric crystalline low energy ground statedescribed above.When the symmetry of these two ordering principles are incompatible,imagine an arrangement of neighboring atoms that prefer anti-alignment of themagnetic moments which are placed on a geometrically triangular rather than asquare lattice, there is no single arrangement that can satisfy both magnetic andgeometric principles. What emerges in this state of frustration is the potential for amultiplicity of nearly equal energy states. Water has the potential for both geometricice crystal symmetry as well as arrangements of hydrogen proton (+) to oxygenelectron (-) magnetic moments (with well-ordered oxygen lattices but disorderamong the hydrogen positions). It is therefore not surprising that a multiplicity of139
indirectly by my sons and church elders about joining a study group for personalconversion.I was surprised to learn that discussions of current political topics were aregular part of these discussions as well as the Sunday and Wednesday nightservices. We received a weekly political action committee report. Their issuesinvolved abortion, school vouchers, sex education in schools, family planning,school prayer and carefully chosen Christian elected officials for school boards andthe Congress. As a congregation, we frequently held hands in small circles andprayed for the electoral success of our issues and candidates. Twenty years later,this movement has evolved into the public political morality play of the Republicanbase of George W. Bush.Laying on of hands, dying in the Lord, speaking in tongues, dancing in theaisles and praying with up stretched arms were routine in the hymn dense services.The goal for all was the spiritual transformation of mind as in Romans, “…be notfashioned according to this world, but be ye transformed by the renewing of yourmind that ye may prove what is the good and well-pleasing and perfect will ofGod…” The pastor told us that the world ruled mind could not grasp spiritual thingsas in Corinthians “…they are foolishness unto him and he cannot know them,because they are spiritually understood.”My research took me to a collaborative project at a European mathematicsinstitute for three months. I returned to our town very late on a Saturday night. Iplanned to surprise my sons by appearing at their usual choice of the middle servicethe next day. I drove up to the warehouse church fifteen minutes before the servicewas scheduled and found that the parking lot of the strip mall was nearly empty.There was no Cadillac parked at the front door. I banged on the double door when Ifound it locked. More then a little surprised, I called my eldest. He told me that fourweeks before, the pastor disappeared, I later found that his disappearanceaccompanied that of the congregation’s bank account, and no one knew where hehad gone. He had not warned or informed anyone in the congregation about hisplans. Calmly and without apparent awareness of my surprise and distress, my141eldest asked me if I would like to attend the late Sunday morning service at theirnewly chosen Charismatic Christian church. He gave me its address and told methat the service started at 11:00 AM. There still was enough time for us to meetthere. I wondered how the Pastor Carl Austin would use this incident in sermonsabout sin and redemption to his next congregation.Further Readings for Pentecostal Phase TransitionsReligious and Spiritual Groups in Modern America. Robert S. Elliwood, Prentice-Hall, Englewood, N.J. 1973.The Name of Jesus. Kenneth E. Hagin, Rhema Bible Church. Tulsa, Oklahoma.1979.War on the Saints. Jessie Penn-Lewis, Robert Lowe, N.Y. 1973.Discipleship, David Watson, Hodder and Stoughton, London, 1981.Mysticism. Evelyn Underwood, Dutton, N.Y. 1911.A Nation of Believers Martin Marty, Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago. 1976.Introduction to Percolation Theory. Dietrich Stauffer. Taylor and Francis. London.1985.Modern Theory of Critical Phenomena. Shang-Keng Ma, Benjamin/Cummings.Reading, MA. 1976.A Modern Course in Statistical Physics. Linda E. Reichl, Univ. Texas Press, Austin,1980.142Manic-Depressive Illness. Fred K. Goodwin and Kay R. Jamison, Oxford Univ.Press, N.Y. 1990.The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. Louis S. Goodman and Alfred Gilman,MacMillan, N.Y. 1975.Statistical Mechanics of Phase Transitions. J.M. Yeomans, Clarendon Press,Oxford. 1992.143CHAPTER 7:AMPHETAMINE ROLL-UP AND SPLITTINGWe try to understand the metaphysics and inner dynamical life of thecommitted, judgmental, fundamentalist believer. In these sacerdotaly rigid andfaithful, disenfranchisement and righteous intolerance toward other denominationsare simultaneous with spiritual compassion, mercy and forgiveness for the membersof their own. This splitting between the good people and latent evil doers is seen bypsychoanalysts and dynamically oriented brain scientists as an all too common,sometimes psychopathological, solution to the inevitable ambiguities of living. I amcertainly not alone in being fearful of Fundamentalists: Jewish, Christian, Moslemand Hindu. From the overpass above the freeway, bearded Jewish Orthodox menrained rocks onto the roof of my rented car because I was driving on Sabbath. Aresearch project had taken me to Jerusalem Mental Health Center’s neurochemicallaboratories for collaborative work with mostly secular Jewish scientists. Halachicconsiderations, those of Jewish lawfulness, comparable to the constraints of Muslimshirah, forbids working, even driving, on the Sabbath. Orthodox Jews live walkingdistance from synagogues or benefit from a rabbinicaly blessed, network ofsymbolically covered walkways for going longer distances on the Sabbath. This144Sabbarian grid of permission obviously did not cover driving on the free way to themental health center.It is the splitting of us from them that leads to the breakdown in empathy andcompassionate identification with others. Studies of the dominance of direction ofrotation within a closed space in small mammals have shown that amphetamineinducedintensification makes the choice of right versus left (or left versus right)rotation, broken symmetry, more statistically significant. In contrast, the HefnerFoundation of Switzerland has shown that entheogenic drugs such as psilocybin inman facilitate seeing both of the conflicting, simultaneously presented, right eye andleft eye images in place of the usual dominance of just one of the tworepresentations. A precondition of compassion might be that a person’s brain beable to see and comprehend both or several sides of apparently conflicting points ofview at the same time. The Fundamentalists do not see things that way. In theKoran, Mohammed says, “…give sustenance to the poor man, the orphan, thecaptive…and for the unbelievers We have prepared fetters and chains and ablazing fire….” In the New Testament’s Mark we find the final words of the risenJesus, “…whoever believes and is baptized will be saved but whoever does notbelieve will be damned.” The Crusaders’ claimed scriptural support for theirmurderous marches to reclaim Jerusalem.Carl Jung wrote about the New Testament’s Revelations in his Answer toJob: “…a terrifying picture that blatantly contradicts all ideas of Christian humility,tolerance, love of your neighbor and your enemies and makes nonsense of a lovingfather in heaven and rescuer of mankind. A veritable orgy of hatred, wrath,vindictiveness and blind destructive fury that revels in fantastic images of terrorbreaks out…overwhelming a world which Christ endeavored to restore to theoriginal state of innocence and loving communion with God…” As PrincetonUniversity philosopher, Walter Kaufman, has noted in his Religion in FourDimensions “…compassion for unbelievers is implicitly condemned andproscribed…Augustine argued expressly against compassion for the damned andLuther used invectives against his (religious) enemies…” How can this be God’s145setting for the spiritual work toward that promised in John “…that you love oneanother; even as I have loved you, that you also love one another.”In contrast with what has been described in previous chapters as theentheogenic drug-induced transitions to a spiritual mind, one is tempted to describethese Fundamentalists’ states as the amphetamine religions. The Los AngelesRam’s Hall of Fame defensive end, on very high doses of amphetamine (125milligrams compared with the diet dose of 5 milligrams) taken four hours before theSunday games, the Baptist minister, Deacon Jones, used his famous andconsciousness annihilating head slap to daze the opposing offensive tackle in orderto gain access to and injure the other team’s quarterback. Before taking the handfulof Dexedrine spansuls, he would tell me, “See you on Tuesday.” Along with theDeacon’s destructive aggression was the other invariant feature of the actions ofhigh doses of amphetamine, compulsive stereotypy, the fixity and driven repetitionof over simplified actions and thoughts along with the loss of breadth of vision andadaptive flexibility. Deacon consistently rushed inside, took the inside lane, in spiteof offensive linemen, who having studied previous game films, being set up toexpect his route. They used this knowledge to take him out of the play. In moderntheological parlance, judgmental rigidity and thinly veiled disapproval take the placeof the more flexibly curious and lovingly humane feelings of the participants in theevolution in spiritual understanding of today’s liberal Protestant process religions.These are the ones that believe that the properties of God evolve along with ourbiology, our brains and our growing scientific understanding of ourselves and theworld.Angry splitting is not just a stimulant drug effect. Recall my experience of thesudden emergence of a first second wind after a mile or so of my daily ten miles ofrunning. It was frequently accompanied by inner bursts of obsessive, paranoidthoughts. Taking five milligrams of amphetamine felt much like the first secondwind. I am full of energy with arrogant feelings of power, mind fixated in grand andsimple ideas that I believe to be absolute and correct. I feel irritably intolerant aboutanyone or anything different. It is my virtuous duty to set everyone straight.146In the 1980’s, Moishe Zar, a desert castle dwelling, settlement organizing,ardent Orthodox Jewish Zionist, now 65 years old, was the leading vigilante of theWest Bank He planted bombs in the cars of Arab mayors and plotted to blow up theDome of the Rock. Buying up farmland from the Palestinians beginning in 1979,many of whom were then killed by their own because they were seen ascollaborators, Zar and his group of young volunteer settlers took over harvesting thePalestinian’s olive trees and shooting rifles over the heads of those that would takethem back. Fundamentalist Christians share his vision that the coming of theMessiah, the second for Christians, the first for the Jews, is dependent upon thecomplete return of all of the land of Israel to the Jews.I recall that in the middle 1940’s, my father took me to a fund raising dinnerfor the local chapter of the Jewish Antidefamation League. The whispered talk wasabout blowing up a warehouse in which anti-Semitic pamphlets were stored,planned for the middle of the night when it was unoccupied. Even at the age of 10, Icould tell that their quiet anger and firm commitment made these threatened menfeel less vulnerable. I understood a little more about the motivation for this proposednighttime property destruction when, the following year, my father explained thereason for our being refused overnight rooms at several motels as we drove along I-95 in Southeast Florida. It took us until late night to find a place to sleep. This wasAmerica’s muted version of what Hitler and his legions were doing to Jews that, atthat time, was not generally known, except for Walter Winchell, in America.Resonant with our chemical-cultural theme are the many reports that Hitler wastaking an amphetamine drug, Benzedrine, daily and in high doses for the last 20 ormore years of his life. One can hear the characteristic, amphetamine-induced,higher pitched, rants in his recorded radio tirades. Compare the pitch and strainedvoice quality of the singing of Bob Dylan in his early records made while he was onspeed with the gravely, much lower pitched voice, now that he is not. In ourbehavioral neuropharmacology laboratory at the Brain Research Institute at UCLA,Professor Charles Spooner and I used an audiographic oscilloscope to monitor thesounds of baby chicks whose peeps became higher in pitch and rate followinginjections of amphetamine. The earliest members of the methadrine-amphetamine147chemical family were synthesized by the great organic chemists of the Germanpharmaceutical industry in the early 1930’s.The sequence of parallel streets in the neighborhood of my home and firstgrammar school in Kansas City, Missouri were my street, Virginia, then Tracy,Forrest and Troost. My school, Bancroft Elementary, was on Tracy and one blockdown that street was the Lutheran Day School established by German immigrantsunder the aegis of the Missouri Synod. Starting in the third grade in 1943, I wasintermittently and unpredictably chased by rock throwing, “damn Jew” and “Christkiller” shouting boys from the Lutheran Day School. I had my choice of running forsafety directly from Tracy to my family’s half duplex at 4232 Virginia Street, ormoving away from school via Troost and then down several blocks and around tosneak back to my home on Virginia without being spotted. One run-for-it afternoon,my parents took me to the emergency room of the Menorah Hospital to have myscalp sewed up where a sharp rock had landed.When I asked my synagogue’s young people’s spiritual counselor, RabbiKleigfeld, to explain the feelings and actions of these children of Martin Luther’sPost-Reformation Christian Church, he answered that I already knew about similarlydifficult places and times of our Twelve Tribes’ like Rome, Medieval Europe, theSpanish Inquisition, Persia (Iran) and, it was rumored, in Germany as we spoke.“Conversion or death” was its most benign form, in places like Spain and Iran, manyJews faked it, staying alive and practicing Judaism secretly. Kleigfeld told me thatthe causes of this historical theme of persecution of Jews were complex.Among the frequently unmentioned events recorded in the later part of theworldly life of Mohammed, who lived from 570 to 632 AD was, ”…in the name ofAllah, the Compassionate, the Merciful…” his participation in the crushing of theJewish tribe of al-Nadhir in 626 A.D., the beheading of 800 Jewish men of the tribeof Qurayza who refused to accept Allah as their God in 627 A.D. and putting to thesword the Jews of Khaybar in 629 A.D. As in the section of the Koran called TheCow, Mohammed proposed to “…fight against them (the infidels) until idolatry is nomore and Allah’s religions reigns supreme…” In contrast, the more entheogenicspiritual orientation of the ecstatic followers of Mohammed in his earlier years148speaks of the multiplicity of valid Ways to Deep Truth. The acceptability of manyways is supported in the tales from the millennial oral tradition of the Sufi Masters intheir Teaching Stories. One of them, What Befell the Three, is attributed to the early18 th Century Sufi teacher, the Dervish Murad Shami. In it, an apparition is mobilizedby the concentrated Truth seeking efforts of three Sufi Dervishes named Yak, one,Do, two and Se, three. When this “…white smoke head of the very old man…” wasasked what he was, he answered “…I am what you think me to be…have you neverheard the saying ‘There are as many ways to the Deep Truth as there hearts ofman.’” In the narratives about the lives of the Mevlevi Islam dervishes calledMunaquib el-Arafin (1353), Jalaludin Rumi, the Sufi saint, instructs his ill andtroubled petitioner to ask forgiveness from the Christian he recently spat on saying“…whether a ruby or a pebble, there is a place on His hill, there is a place for all…”Cole Barks and Michael Green’s The Illuminated Prayer (2000) notes that the Rumifollower, Bawa Muhaiyaddeen, a modern Sufi guru, was said to be keenly awarehow quickly spiritual entheogenic systems can become amphetamine-like and“…develop rigid marching orders …which turn into a dumb obsession with otherpeople’s behavior…”It appears that entheogenic and amphetamine spiritualities can coexistcontemporaneously, in Islam as well as in all the other of the world’s great religions.One day, sneaking home from school, taking the long way around via Troost,I was spotted and chased up some stairs into an apartment building’s dark hall.Terrified, I swung hard and hit the leading angry and noisy head with a propitiouslyfound snow shovel that had been left near the apartment’s entrance. An ambulancewas called to tend to the twelve-year-old, transiently unconscious, Lutheran boy. Herecovered completely within a day and the chases after school and my desperateescapes stopped suddenly, never to reappear. After several months, our familycrossed the socioeconomic divide in Kansas City to a more tolerant, upper middleclass, Southside neighborhood near Rockhill Road, to a suburban home, one blockfrom Missouri’s border with Kansas. There, persecution for my Jewishness tookmore subtle forms such as not being permitted to play teen-age golf with my friends,though invited, on their Blue Hills and Kansas City Country Club’s golf courses. It149was decades later that the first Jewish member of the KCCC was the founder of Hand R Block. Unable to afford membership in the single all Jewish country club ofthe region, I practiced for my high school golf team on Armour Hills Public GolfCourse, where, at the time, mostly white working class golfers played.How can it be that spiritual states include both personal humbleness andloving mercy toward some of mankind and judgmentalness, nonacceptance andcommitment to seduction, threat and even violence in the service of invokingchanges in the beliefs of others. How can the high energy calm of being home atlast in the born again condition with its new freedom from self assaults about sin,most importantly that of disbelief, but also peccadilloes such as drunkenness,promiscuity and familial abuse, be associated with readiness to judge, harass evenpersecute others. Psychoanalysts would say that it is a riddance mechanism, theprojection of unwanted personal traits onto others. From the standpoint of rationalthought, this seems more like non-Aristotelian cognition, two, not either-or,countervailing orientations toward mankind held simultaneously. The newbornparishioners of these charismatic amphetamine churches express their fealty toGod with strongly held beliefs that diagram logically as contradictions. Theperception of the world’s peoples into believers and infidels, good and evil, ourpeople and your people, ourselves and the others. It is generally believed amongsocial psychologists that it is the perceived nonpersonness of others, which allowsthe cruelty that empathic identification with them would never permit. Splitting feelslike resolution, its stereotypy reducing the complexity of spiritual thought as well astrue to life perception.A concrete laboratory example of amphetamine conversion, the suddentransition to a high energy, fixated, and delusional state called amphetaminepsychosis, is supplied by experiments in humans conducted by Professor JohnGriffith at Vanderbilt University in the 1960’s. These experiments would not beallowed by today’s human research committees or medical ethicists. Each one of agroup of psychologically screened-as-normal graduate student volunteers, at anindividually unique amphetamine dose, developed suddenly a personally uniqueand peculiar system of new beliefs, obsessionally held as rational thoughts. Ten150milligrams of amphetamine were administered to volunteer subjects every hour untilevery subject crossed their particular threshold for personality change. Thegraduate students underwent a global mind-brain-person transition at differing totaldoses of amphetamine. The subject’s world was suddenly transformed into one ofenemies and friends. The syndrome dissipated over several hours when the drugwas stopped and the plasma levels of amphetamine and its metabolites declined.As amphetamine makes memory formation and recall stronger, the subjects wereembarrassed when remembering what strange and forbidding yet uneatable thingsthey so strongly believed. These included such things as: they as good people werecaught in a network of bad person Russian spies; some threatening others arrangedfor poison gas to be seeping out of the water faucet; the white coated scientistswere CIA undercover intelligence officers hoping to get information about their smallpornography collection. The subject’s world had become divided in, for eachperson, a stereotyped way.After a couple of weeks of return to normal living, the experiment wasrepeated. Each subject again developed his or her individually unique set of goodguy,bad-guy delusional beliefs and at the same dose of amphetamine as before.Like those of strong faith, their ideas once again resisted the logical argumentsmade by the professional staff: that the new realities were neuropsychological andhad an obvious pharmacological origin. While on the drug, all stuck to their story,even while being shown the movie record of their first drug-induced episode. Thereis reliable scientific literature describing kamikaze pilots on high doses ofamphetamine in an ecstatic state of Shinto nationalism. With their planes loadedwith explosives, they deliberately crashed their planes onto American aircraftcarriers in the Pacific Theater of World War II. One wonders if these drug-inducedstates occur in the drug-free condition in today’s abstemious Muslim suicidebombers.A more abstract and general way of thinking about the sudden emergence offixation, repetitiousness and splitting in feelings and thoughts involves theemergence of regular limit cycle oscillations in a complex system that was behavingpreviously in a stable but flexible way. Locking up into a fixed, closed loop, is a151common way for electrical circuits, computer programs, brain mechanisms andother complicated systems, even cultural or spiritual movements, to behave whenone or more important control parameters crosses a threshold. Doyne Farmer of theLos Alamos’s Prediction Company once said about this vulnerability in complexsystem, “Those things can hardly wait to roll up.” The limit cycle lock-up occursmost often as a sudden, discontinuous change, called a bifurcation, intoautonomous self-oscillations from an equilibrium state around which there wassome random variation. A bifurcation, a discontinuous change in outcome from asmooth changes cause, characteristically occurs when the amount of an importantinfluence, a metabolic state, a drug, a psychodynamic conflict or level of emotionalstimulation crosses some critical value. The switch from one type of dynamicalbehavior to another looks like the system has suddenly changed into somethingelse with an entirely new kind of life of its own. In the new life of rolled up, locked-uprepetitious motion, almost all new starting conditions follow pathways that lead intothe same limit cycle pattern. Evangelical Christians talk about all born again lifebeing in Jesus, fixed in a complete set of moral, social and political beliefs, ideasand judgments. The limit cycle gets its name because the end state of the orbits ofalmost all starting points of the dynamics winds up being drawn into the same fixed,repetitious pattern of a stable cycle. Visualizing the simulation of one kind ofbifurcation to a limit cycle on a computer screen, we see a slightly jiggling pointexplode suddenly into an orbit of ceaseless rotations around a circle.Ralph Abraham, the University of California at Santa Cruz pioneer ingraphical approaches to nonlinear systems, describes, cinemagraphically, theemergence of limit cycles from a single point. He starts with a picture of an attractorof water flow in the shape of a basin. All water that enters the basin, rolls down itssides to the bottom, to what physicists say represents a potential energy minimum.A little more technically, this attractor basin is composed of the set of all points suchthat the orbits that flow from them tend to end up inside the basin as time goestoward infinity, no matter where they start. Changing the value of a controlparameter of the system changes the shape of this basin-like landscape, of thesurface of the systems dynamical actions called a manifold, which can intuitively152predict how the fluid will flow upon it. If we start with a simple bowl, a parabolicbasin, then the attractor itself is a point at the bowl’s very bottom. Changing thevalue of some influential parameter may induce the sudden formation of a small hill,growing at the center of the basin’s bottom. Now fluid flow in the attractor bowl runsdown to a path around the hill at its bottom. The autonomous motion of the fluidflows takes place now in a circular orbit. The basin of the new attractor is theoriginal bowl minus the point at the top of the central hill. The fluid flow around thehill at the bottom of the basin is circular and is called a limit cycle. Note that thedirection of the rotation of the limit cycle can circle in one direction or the other. Insome computational simulations, motion alternates between directions. Thissuggests the aspect of the born again amphetamine religions, splitting. There is anunstable and intermixed probability of right versus left turning directions and theiralternation. This vulnerability to directional splitting and often unpredictablealterations in action themes can represent what seem to be paradoxicalcombinations of both good and evil in the same strongly faithful, for example, theapparent bidirectional morality of generous and loving, pederast priests.These mathematically flavored images of the sudden emergence of a limitcycle in complex systems was made biologically concrete to me by researchconducted by one of my first graduate students, David Segal. He is now a professorof psychiatry at the University of California in San Diego. His program of workinvolved the administration of very gradually increasing doses of amphetamine torats while their behavior was being monitored and recorded by a continuouslyrunning video camera. He documented the behavior of rats in a walled rectangularspace within which, without drugs, they first wandered about randomly and thensettled down to rest in an individually selected, favorite home corner. Segal calledall of these phenomena, patterns of exploratory behavior. At doses of amphetaminebelow 2.5 milligrams (mg) per kilogram weight (kg), the exploration of the entirebounded space proceeded faster than was the case with their salt-water treatedcontrols, their paths being more uniformly distributed throughout the box. Theyspent less time resting in their home corner. At almost precisely 2.5 mg/kg, the rat’sbehavior changed dramatically into an entirely new pattern of continuous circling. As153was the case in the abstract manifold picture of bifurcations to limit cycles, somerats tended to circle their chamber to the left and some to the right and switchingbetween them was often seen.The influence of amphetamine and other brain dopamine neurotransmittermediateddrug manipulations on directional turning tendencies in rats, mice andcats were the focus of brain and behavioral research of Professor Stanley Glick ofthe University of Massachusetts. The asymmetry of dopamine concentrations in thetwo sides of the brain, particularly in the medial prefrontal cortex and the brainstem’s nucleus accumbens, predicted both the paw preference for pellet reachingand direction of turning in several studies in rats. These findings were statisticallytrue over a population of rats, but not necessarily predictive for any single one.Reminiscent of the conflict between good and evil in our human spiritual analogy,naturally right turning male rats and left turning female rats, when compared withthe opposite paired group, were greater voluntary ingesters of alcohol placed intheir water bottles.Splitting as a part of the phenomenology of limit cycle bifurcations, withdirectional implications for good and evil, has neurological support in humans aswell. In the context of contrasting right versus left hemispheric temporal lobesyndromes, recall that temporal lobe seizures with a right side excitatory focusleads to the development of the Geshwind Syndrome, a high, softly energetic andsaintly state of spiritual preoccupation and voluminous writings, loving and generouskindness toward all and the complete disappearance of sexual interest but notsexual potency. A left temporal lobe excitatory focus leads to the development ofthe Kluver-Bucy Syndrome of indiscriminate aggressiveness and hypersexuality.Experimental simulations of this syndrome in cats lead to them mounting andattacking living and nonliving things, even chairs. A variety of manipulations of thesymmetry of brain dopamine concentration and dynamics by its characteristic drug,amphetamine, interact with lateral brain lesions such that we conclude that thestimulant-induced limit cycle lockup remains a phenomena influenced by drugs, sex,genetic predisposition and several other experimental conditions. This situation is154perhaps not so different in variety and complexity from the range of representationsin art and literature of the left hand of evil and the right hand of grace.Oscillations that appear spontaneously in nonlinear systems without externalperiodic input were known to Henri Poincaré in 1882, and were systematicallystudied and made accessible to non-mathematicians by early 20 th Century Russianmathematicians and physicists, well represented by a 1949 book, Theory ofOscillations by the Russian engineer-mathematicians, A. A. Andropov and C.E.Chaikin. Another relatively early classic is Nonlinear Oscillations by NicholasMinorsky. The most common form of transition from a fixed point to a limit cycle waspictured as changes in the surface of the action, the bowl-hillock manifold in theparagraphs above, and is called a Hopf bifurcation. Recall that bifurcation means adiscontinuous change in an observable over a continuous change in what is knownas a control parameter, such as dose of amphetamine or intensity of an experience.The mathematical mechanism resulting in circular directional motion represented bythe (eigen)vectorial states, was named for the German mathematician, EduardHopf. His 1942 paper was a mathematical proof of its existence and was discussedin the context of fluid flows that role up such that circling vortices arise from smooth,called laminar, water flow, at a critical value of the flow rate. Hurricanes are anotherexample of these kinds of dynamics.The Hopf bifurcation to limit cycles has been found in several, manydimensional, physical, chemical and biological systems. The latter include calciumconductance oscillations in the excitable membranes of muscle, heart and the brain,cardiac arrhythmias such as ventricular flutter as well as oscillations in populationnumbers in foxes and rabbits, predator-prey systems. California Institute ofTechnology’s Professor, James Old and Johns Hopkins Professor, Joseph Bradymade experimentally obvious the potential for the rigid irrationality implied by thebrain’s inclination to be locked up into limit cycle behavior. They demonstrated thatanimals, from rats to monkeys, could get locked up in apparent self torture,repeatedly and endlessly pushing a bar to deliver current to pain systems in thetheir brains. These pushes induced almost unremitting screams in monkeys and155what appeared to be rageful biting and then immobilized resignation in behaviorallydepressed rats.Freud’s last paper, Analysis, Terminable and Interminable (1939), featuredexamples of what he perceived to be the unsolvable mystery of helplesspsychological entrapment in repetitious patterns of self-destructive behavior. Heblamed the Iliad’s and Odyssey’s villainous immortal, Thanatos, the everthreateningspirit of death and destruction to contrast with the good, life giving Eros.The Yiddish word for a personified Thanatos is Moloch ha-Moves. A range offixations in self-excitatory, repetitious, self-mutilating behaviors is documented indomesticated animals. Dogs, particularly German Shepherds and LabradorRetrievers, can lock up in compulsive grooming cycles of what is called acral lick inwhich endless licking of paws or flanks lead to the break down of skin into seepingsoredermatitis, which, in turn, stimulates more licking.Mark Twain wrote a story about his getting stuck in ceaseless mentalrepetitions of a catchy, clangy poem. He could not stop reciting it to himself evenafter days of sleep loss and anorexia. He was finally cured by relating his problemand the poem to his pastor who he then unwittingly heard creating a communityepidemic by including the rhyme in his following Sunday’s sermon. Psychologists,who study this form of human mental limit cycle attacks, call this state of internal,repetitiously recited, poetic stuckness, earworms.There are additional invariants of sudden transformations into spiritual-mindbrainbifurcations into a limit cycle lockups and, as discussed, one of them ispsychological splitting. In psychoanalytic theory, as first suggested by Freud in his1937 written and posthumously published paper, Splitting of the Ego in the Processof Defense (1940), splitting implies two simultaneous and contrary psychologicalreactions, one can be conscious and the other unconscious. They can both emergein conflictual situations involving adaptive efforts of the personality to deal with theopposition between some form of powerful instinctual pressure and attendantperceived or imagined danger. Otto Fenichel’s Psychoanalytic Theory of Neurosis(1950) elucidates multiple manifestations of splitting of the I (more technically, theego) into a conscious part that knows reality versus an unconscious part that denies156it. In some situations, a logical view contends with a more irrational, magical one.Today, the morning group praying, evening hymn singing, Christian RepublicanRight Wing feed their feelings of being on the side of God by dividing people intothose that are like them and good and those that President Bush and AttorneyGeneral John Ashcroft calls the evil doing “bad guys.” As noted previously,psychoanalytic theory posits that the evil doing others may represent the projectedrepository of our own unacceptable impulses and inclinations. It became quite clearin my own psychoanalysis and psychoanalytic training that it is in healing our splitand knowledge of our own unacceptable things that will lead to our understandingand forgiveness of others.As we dig deeper into global brain-mind dynamics of emergent high-energyfixation, stuck repetitiousness and splitting, we encounter their universality in thestructures of mathematical thought. Did we just make them fit? Do these thoughtforms map onto internal and external physical reality? Are these abstract conceptsand operations simply products of our biological brains manifested as psychologicalmechanics and used to explain to ourselves what we perceive and think? Does asquare have external reality or is it a universally imagined something, and, as such,represented only in our minds and the pictures of it we draw? Is mathematicalunderstanding simply inborn perceptual skills combined with developed andpracticed logical cognition? Or, do we take the Platonic view of mathematicalrelations: these abstractions are the ultimate realities, antedating and persistingthrough the past, present and future of the universe and omnipresent.Where can the conceptual boundary be drawn between the physical reality ofthe Babylonian surveyors use of the Pythagorean theorem to calculate distances,that the sum of the squares of the lengths of the two legs of a right triangle is equalto the square of the length of its hypotenuse, and its abstract, pencil-marks-onpaper,algebraic development as in the definition of Pythagorean numbers, a,b, andc such that a 2 + b 2 = c 2 . The dichotomy between the abstract and concrete,consistently blurred in our work, is between a natural science with ideas that can bedisconfirmed, directly or indirectly, by experimental observation and the thinking ofmathematics as an a priori field in the sense of Kant. The modern Platonic view157such as that held by Rene Thom is that once accepting a set of natural givens,called the axioms, the rest of the knowledge of this reality grows in the form oftheorems that relate to the axioms and each other through their logical consistency.Knowledge of reality is moved by the ever-forward mathematical refinement of apriori conditions to do away with the theorems’ exceptions, called counter examples.The Hebraic Bible’s view of signifiers such as words and symbols is close to,but not identical with, the Platonic view of mathematical formalism. According to theTorah, God made the word with words. God spoke and the world became real. TheAramaic for “I create in speaking” is avara k’davara , or as the magician says, as hewaves his wand over an apparently empty black high hat, abracadabra. TheHebrew word for word, davar, also signifies thing. This view contrasts with themathematical formalists, among them Hilbert, who considered the signifiers ofabstract mathematics simply symbols used in a game, the rules of which beingarbitrary, must include proofs of consistencies among them. Consistency from thepoint of view of physics was addressed by Hertz, in Die Prinzipien derMechanik,(1894), where he expressed the formalist theoretical physicist’s work as“…within our own minds we create images or symbols of the external objects, andwe construct them in such a way that the logically necessary consequences of theimages are again the images of the physically necessary consequences of theobjects.”In another set of related contrasts, the constructionist mathematician willargue that mathematical assertions are only true if they can be demonstrated, foundor constructed. In contrast, the classical school of mathematics can develop thecase for the truth of mathematical statements if they are consistent with field’snetwork of theorems and proofs, even if, up to the current time, no specific exampleof this truth can be demonstrated. The former can be thought of as a builder, thelatter as a discoverer. For example, suppose we try to make a proposition aboutperfect numbers where a perfect number is defined as being equal to half the sumof its divisors. Using the perfect number 6, we find that its non-identity divisors are1, 2, and 3 and half of their sum = 6. Our proposition: either there exists an oddperfect number, or else there exists no odd perfect number. An expression of this158forced decision between yes and no is called the excluded middle. Theconstructionist mathematician, an orientation without the excluded middle, assertsthat “an odd perfect number exists” would only be meaningful if one could show thatsuch a number had been found or constructed. The classical mathematician wouldfind the phrase “no odd perfect number exists” meaningful without a concreteexample, if the assumption of its existence would lead to a no (versus yes)contradiction encountered in the proof-relevant network of established theoremsand their relations. The symbolic operations of these formal schools of mathematicsand their relationship to the objective and ideational realities of brain-mind-spirituallife have been viewed by some as Western cultural products rather thanexpressions of secular or spiritual Absolutes. Still others have argued that culturalrelativism is not relevant here because mathematicians worldwide constitute amonoculture.With respect to the real world existence of abstract mathematical structure,our Platonic bias must be obvious. The thrilling experience of a new reality I get toknow from finally understanding how a theorem works and the rush of peering intothe grandeur of the Grand Canyon feel like the same kind of full-of-wonder high tome. I blend them here without reservation. Perhaps this world of spiritual abstractionis closer to the orientation of the school of intuitionist mathematics. Its founder,L.E.J. Brouwer, required that every mathematical construction be so immediatelyapparent to the human mind that no formal proof was necessary. This became myform of spiritual transcendence, which led naturally to a mathematical, mysticalfaith.We carry the explication of this kind of reality further. Reflections of the goodand evil, right and left, moral directional biases and their relative weightings in bornagain bifurcations to invariant circles called limit cycles, can be symbolicallyrepresented in what are called the complex eigenvalues of matrices describing thesystem’s set of orthogonal motions with changes in their control parameters. Thebehavior of these complex eigenvalues underlies and characterizes themathematical mechanism of the Hopf bifurcation.159The subject of complex eigenvalues brings up in me the emotionallydisturbing subject of imaginary and complex numbers. I can still feel a little of myearlier anxiety. The episode started benignly enough. Our high school’s freshmanalgebra class was studying how to solve quadratic equations, equations in whichthe highest power of an expression was two. Told to work at the blackboard in frontof the class, I was given the problem of finding the two values of x that were theroots of the equation, 5x 2 + 3x + 4 = 0. I had been taught to use the memorizedquadratic formula,2− b±b −4acx = , in which a = 5, b = 3 and c = 4. I always2acalculated the square root part first and wound up with the expression,9 − 80 = −71.I can still feel the sinking feeling in my stomach as I looked at theresult. I anticipated the usual snide remarks and embarrassment as I contemplateddoing what I did not know how to do, take the square root of a negative number. Mr.Kirby, the retired mechanical engineer who was my high school freshman algebrateacher tried to help, but I did not trust him. It seemed to me that he had alreadyhumiliated me in front of the class, several times. He asked, “… what number whensquared, multiplied by itself, would equal –1.” He then asked it another way: solvethe following equation for x: x 2 +1 = 0. Seeing something I could do, I wrote the nextline quickly x 2 = -1 and then, taking the square root of both sides, I wrote x = − 1 .He then asked me what that meant. I answered by writing quickly, glibly and blindlythat that meant that − 1×− 1=−1. He asked me to explain what that meant bygiving him an example from the real world. Not yet knowing about imaginary andcomplex (combine real and imaginary numbers), I stood head down, ashamed andsilent, thinking that my smart friend Jerry Blau would get the answer immediately.Mr. Kirby said he would go on with the class while I continued to stand in front of theblackboard and thought about it. He told me to interrupt him when I was ready toanswer. Some classmates were smirking, others giggled aloud. They had seen himdo this to me before.Mr. Kirby, a short, muscular man, an ex-marine with a military haircut and abrusque manner, lectured that mathematical competence and obedience toauthority and class discipline were all of a piece. I asked him about mathematical160creativity and he said that this class was certainly not about that. I disliked andfeared him. He seemed to feel (and wrote a note to my parents to the effect) that,being “too arrogant” I needed to be “brought down a peg or two.” I had gotten thebest grades in the first two exams and was enjoying the role of after school tutor forsome of my friends. I suspect I was getting pretty egotistical. In class, I found myselfeagerly shouting out answers without holding up my hand, behavior that Mr. Kirbymet with his characteristic look of fatigued disgust. Twice I was thrown out of classfor my introjections. He then began to give me problems that I could not do, forwhich I was not prepared. This left me standing at the blackboard until the end ofthe hour, after all the rest of the students had solved theirs and sat down. Onparent’s night, Mr. Kirby told my father that I needed more “social and intellectualdiscipline.”Inspired and personally directed hard work and socially defined correctbehavior were not synonymous to this arrogant 13 year old who had alreadybrought chagrin to his mother, the conservatory classical piano instructor, with hissatirical pianistic jazzy composition called “How High the Moonlight Sonata.” I wasalso a secret reader of the book on the top back shelf in my father’s library by JackHanley called “How to Make Mary; A Gentlemen’s Guide to Seduction.” In Mr.Kirby’s class, inspired by the book, I sometimes reached behind me, through thecrack in my desk seat, to caress the inside part of the long smooth legs andsometimes moist panties of a well developed, tall and beautiful brunette girl behindme. I was never caught and she pretended that nothing was happening. In fact, shenever talked to me outside of class. I felt then, vaguely, and now, more specifically,that a content enriched, instinctually titillated and excited unconscious could leadme to the solutions of intellectual challenges if it were both sufficiently indulged anduntrammeled, left alone in its work of being itself. Mr. Kirby did not see things thatway.Since then, among my graduate and post-doctoral students in theneurosciences, I have learned that the Mr. Kirby’s of modern American educationalpractice have ruined generations of potential mathematicians and physicalscientists. Worse, they have created generations of very bright math phobics who161run to other graduate fields such as biology and medicine and come to resist thepotentially humiliating incursions of new and potentially helpful abstract ideas andoperations from mathematics and physics into their fields. They do not want theirpersecutory versions of Mr. Kirby to take up residence once again in their heads. Ican still feel his negative presence during long hours of struggle with the egodeflating feelings of dumbness that an understanding of almost any newmathematical concept requires of me. Holding Mr. Kirby’s voice off as long as I canuntil, sometimes, the wonderful “aha!” experience arrives. I have tried to forgive himsince but forgetting him has not been possible.It turns out that in the world of elementary, physically representative, realnumbers, the square root of a negative number has no meaning. Such a numberhas understandably come to be called imaginary. Was this the answer Mr. Kirbywanted? There was some conflict among mathematicians in the 17 thand 18 thCentury about the arbitrary definition of −1as an imaginary number. It wassymbolized by a letter, i, that is −1 ≡ i . The existence of i extended the range ofalgebraic definitions so that a solution of the quadratic formula as above could befound for the square root of a negative number. A further expansion of this idea wasto that of a complex number that can have both a real and an imaginary part. Forexample, letting letters be generalized representations of numbers, a complexnumber might be written, a + bi, real number a + real number b times i, the letterssuch as a, b, c, d… symbolized real numbers. Consistent with membership in analgebraic system, a + bi and c + di can be added and multiplied. This extension ofthe real numbers into the imaginary realm permitted d’Alembert’s and Gauss’sproofs (and many, more complete ones since) of the powerful FundamentalTheorem of Algebra from which the faith derives about always being able to find atleast one solution to an algebraic equation. It was proven that any n thalgebraic equation (e.g.has at least one real or complex root.xndegreen 1+ x − + ... = 0 ) with real or complex coefficients alwaysCloser to an image that helps make intuitive connections with human bornagain bifurcations, limit cycles and directional splitting is the geometric interpretationof a complex number, let us now call it z. As above, algebraically, z is the sum of a162real part a, plus b times the imaginary part, bi”; that is, z = a + bi. We can then setup a geometric space to represent z by imagining a two dimensional plane with thehorizontal real axis extending from left to right, the usual x axis, and the verticaldimension, called the imaginary axis, extending from bottom to top like the standardy axis. These two axes, going from negative values to positive ones, left to right andbottom to top, cross at the shared value of 0. Thus a and b can be visualized as therectangular coordinates of a point in the plane and the point locates the complexnumber, z = a + bi. Since real parts and imaginary parts are like apples and pearsand for addition, like must be added to like, if two complex numbers, a + bi and c +di are equal, then a = c and b = d and their sum is written (a + c) + (b + d) i.Now that we’ve set up a point z on the plane, located with a complex numberat z = a + bi, we can then draw an arrow, called a vector, from the intersection of theimaginary and real axis at 0 to this point z. Its length from 0 to z, 0z, we’ll call thatlength ρ , is the size or amplitude-like modulus of the complex number, z = a +bi.The angle this 0z vector makes with the real, 0a-axis, lets call this angle φ , is calledthe argument of complex number z = a +bi. ρ is a length that can grow or shrink, φis an angle that can rotate. We imagine vectorial movement like that of a variablelength hand of a clock. This geometric explication of complex numbers prepares usto visualize complex numbered eigenvalue solutions to matrices representing therelevant equations that bifurcate to limit cycles and directional good and evilsplitting. ρ represents the dilatable clock’s radial amplitude of circular motion andφ , the angle of vectorial turning from the 0a-axis.The complex conjugate of the complex number, a + bi is the complex numbera – bi in which the sign of the imaginary part is reversed. Geometrically, this meansthat a pair of complex conjugate numbers with the ρ ’s of both having below zerovalues relative to the 0a-axis, that is negative real parts, could be imagined as thepoints indicated by two same sized, mirror image, clock hands pointing at 8:00 and10:00 o’clock. Note that the φ , the angle of vectorial deviation of the arrow pair fromthe 0a-axis, turn in opposite directions in these mirror image moving clock handvectors. Without going deeper into the representation of the actions of the system in163question (its differential equation) in the form of what is called its Jacobian matrix ofpartial derivatives (a matrix representation of the differential equation indicatingorthogonal directional velocities of change of locations of the components of themotion with respect to changing values of the control parameter), we know thatwhen the ρ of the matrix’s set of two complex conjugate eigenvalues is less thanzero, ρ < 0, the orbit representing the system, spirals into a stable fixed point. Thisis analogous to going to the bottom of the parabolic attractor basin as describedabove. Values of the invisible eigenvalues and their changes constitute the abstractmathematical mechanisms underlying the observable dynamics of the systemobservable physically.The mathematical mechanism underlying the Hopf bifurcation of fixed pointsinto limit cycles (associated with bi-directional splitting that accompanies theamphetamine transformation into limit cycle stereotypy of rigid ideas and equallylikely mirror image motions in the directions of good versus evil) is the crossing ofthe systems real valued parts, ρ ’s, of its complex conjugate eigenvalues intopositive territory, ρ > 0. The mirror image of clock arrows is transformed from 8:00and 10:00 o’clock to the clock locations of 4:00 and 2:00. At a Hopf bifurcation, apair of complex conjugate eigenvalues crosses the imaginary (vertical) axis suchthat is real parts have positive value. In the orbit representing the motions of thesystem itself, the fixed point disappears to be replaced by the action spiraling out toan invariant circle. This is analogous to our manifold image of the disappearance ofthe central attractive point and the sudden appearance of a small hill at the bottomof a parabolic basic of attraction.. The new attractor is an invariant circular patharound the hill, with the spiraling out to the invariant circle being a two dimensionalpicture of the disappearance of the bowl-bottom and appearance of a missing point,hill top fixed point and a spiral flow to the path circling the hill. Underlying thetransition from a fixed point to a limit cycling, invariant circle, are a pair of mirrorimage complex conjugate eigenvalues that turn in mirror image, we could say, goodversus evil, opposite directions. The Hopf bifurcating system inevitably has both.The implications of this very abstract metaphor for the emergent limit cyclesplittingstyle of spiritual transformation can be made deeper by considering the164common practice of Rumi’s Mevlevi (and other) orders of Islamic Dervishes thatfacilitate the onset and maintenance of their ecstatic states by an improvisationaldance which goes from rocking to irregular whirling. The Dervish teaching talesplace a symbolic emphasis on the power of the rotating wheel, the circling of theheavenly bodies, the mill wheel and the millstone. As Rumi said, “The mountain ofthe sun I’ll fashion to a mill. And as my waters run, I’ll turn thee at my will.” Note thattheir work toward spiritual transformation results in neither the emergence of theinvoluntary and rigid limit cycles of invariant circles or the associated divisiveinternal eigensplitting of good self from evil other. The Sufi compass points to anintegrated field of divine consciousness, which contains the appearance of theworld’s multiplicity. In this profound unity, all humankind is perceived as one family.The singular direction of all prayer, Salat, five times a day, at dawn, high noon,afternoon, sunset and an hour after sunset, turns the entire world into a unifieddirectional field of prayer. At its center, the Islamic pilgrims wander round and roundthe black cube of the ancient shrine of Kaaba,This leaves one with the speculation that we started with: that the simple,authoritarian rules of the amphetamine, roll-up and splitting religions may beintrinsically more vulnerable to unpredictable breakouts into morally inconsistentactions and that the righteously rigid limit cyclists are invariantly split intoambivalence. In contrast, the more free form, chaotic turns of the entheogenicdervish define us all as belonging to one unified ecstatic field.Further Readings for Amphetamine Roll-Up And SplittingPsychology and Religion. Carl G Jung, Princeton Univ. Press, N.J. 1938.The Faith of a Heretic, Walter Kaufmann, Meridian, N.Y. 1959.Nightmare Season. Arnold J. Mandell, Random House, N.Y. 1976.165The Rabbinic Mind. Max Kadushin, Bloch , N.Y. 1972.Coming of (Middle) Age. Arnold J. Mandell, Simon and Schuster, N.Y. 1978.Introduction to Islamic Theology and Law. Ignaz Goldziher, Princeton Univ. Press,N.J. 1981.Tales of the Dervishes. Idries Shah, Dutton, N.Y. 1970.Open Secret; Versions of Rumi. J. Moyne and C. Barks, Threshold Books, Putney,Vermont. 1984.Amphetamine Psychosis, P.H. Connell, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1958.Amphetamine Use, Misuse and Abuse. David Smith, Hall, Boston. 1979.Long-term Administration of D-Amphetamine. David S. Segal and Arnold J. Mandell,Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior. 2:249-255. 1974.Amphetamine Enhancement of Reward Asymmetry. S.D. Glick, L.M. Weaver andR.C. Meibach, Psychopharmacology 73:323-327, 1981.Hopf Bifurcation and Its Applications, Appl. Math. Sci. Vol. 19,. Springer-Verlag,N.Y., N.Y. 1976.Dynamics, The Geometry of Behavior, I-IV, Aerial Press, P.O. Box Office 1360,Santa Cruz, CA 1982.Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems and Bifurcations of Vector Fields. JohnGuckenheimer and Phillip Holmes, Springer-Verlag, N.Y. 1983.166Psychiatric Aspects of Neurologic Disease. D. Frank Benson and Dietrich Blumer,Grune and Stratton, N.Y. 1975.Drives and Reinforcements. James Olds. Raven, N.Y. 1977Neurobiology of Stereotyped Behavior. S.J. Cooper and C.T. Dourish. Clarendon,Oxford, 1990.Mathematics Unlimited—2001 and Beyond. B. Engquist and W. Schmid, Springer,N.Y. 2000.167CHAPTER 8:FAITH AND RATIONALITYIt was my belief that, without subjective evidence of Holy Spirit Energy, therush of reconfiguring transcendent experience, some glimmering of grace no matterhow fleeting, an experience of intoxication with God, Martin Buber’s selfauthenticating I-Thou encounter, the many good citizens of this world, without thesemoments of illumination, must be attending church or temple to negotiate a betternow and hereafter. Attending synagogue or church without the promise of amystical high seemed like a superstitious rabbit foot rubbing for personal health andsafety and a sharing of propitious contacts for social and economic advantage. Whyelse?I have had the good feel of what Jews call Tzedakah, the sharing of suppliesby the haves for the betterment of the have nots. I have known the quiet calm ofhuman right action as in the Unitarian Universalist’s serving the needy, open andflexible, intimate mindfulness of others and their needs. Considering E.O. Wilson’sbrand of brain herd biology of altruism gives me a warm feeling about the potentiallyintrinsic goodness of man. But compared with the Jamesian brands of ecstatictranscendence, minds blown in Sufi twirling, Orthodox Jewish chanting, rocking anddancing, hands-in-the-air praying and hands-on-the-head healings of Wednesdaynight Pentecostal services, the soberly serious social engagement and168responsibility sermons of Reformed Judaism and the Unitarians as well as the 19 thCentury hymns and high I.Q. apologetics of some Presbyterian and Methodistclergy, are like near beer. Formally equivalent but without the rush and the deliciousrisk and promise of life long addiction.National opinion polls have found my preference for churchly fireworks inreligious experience quite common. My Charismatic Christian sons are among themany with a preference for and loving labeling of these kinds of houses of worshipas rock and roll churches. In a recent survey of Americans, 46% of respondentsclaim to be twice born, Evangelical Christians. Perhaps unfortunate with respect totheir children’s academic and professional ambitions, 48% do not accept aDarwinian view of biology. Fifty million American readers are now buying books withplots taken from the Babylonian prophecies and anticipate the Rapture of Returnwith weekly, joyful, mini-rehearsals. They include praying in tongues as the Spiritmoves them like Peter, John, James and the rest of the one hundred and twenty inthe upper room on the day of Pentecost.Those of us with two or more available cable religious networks can, on anygiven Sunday morning, choose a smiling, kind, Proverbs quoting, rationalPresbyterian liturgical stylist. In his seventies, standing tall with a full head of whitehair and in a quietly resonant voice, he delivers a sermon about seven ways toavoid growing old. His list includes learning new things and continuing to work. Hisspiritual proposal was about personal faith, always leaning on the Lord. On anothernetwork, the three hundred pound, restlessly pacing preacher of the CornerstoneAssembly of God Church of San Antonio, Texas, stood in front of large maps of Iraqand the Middle East. He preached from Ezekiel about the refleshing of dry bonesand a return of all Jews to Israel. He said that contributions to his church over thepast year helped finance the return of 4000 Russian Jews to Israel. He reiteratedthe promise that, when the return was completed, there would be a massive Islamicattack on Jerusalem and “we will all rise up to Heaven” in an ecstaticdisappearance. Jews, as long as they accepted Jesus as their Savior, werewelcomed along on the ride. More then two thousand parishioners erupted into loudapplause along with shouts of “praise Jesus.”169An inkling of something entirely different, neither human psychology norfrenzy, was an unanticipated benefit of being at England’s Warwick University insabbatical residence in Math House #2. This large, round, many windows and blackboards, study with a small upstairs bedroom was one of the apartments for visitingprofessors behind the Warwick Mathematics Institute in the English Midlands. Iattended a variety of churches and synagogues on the weekends. The perspectivethat emerged for me at Warwick was that rabbinic Haggadah, inferences to bedrawn from imaginatively spawned narrative, isn’t the same thing as Halakhah, thelaw dictated by Jewish legal tradition; that geometric insight and other intuitionsaren’t the same as mathematical proofs; that the mystical visions of the Englishromantic poet and illustrator, William Blake, were not necessarily consistent with thescientific observations and logical arguments of the contemporary Scottishphilosopher, David Hume. Paul Tillich wrote that the wisdom attendant to primaryspiritual experience that was without the unconditional character of sensible moralobligation was not to be trusted without critical analyses. I learned that among HighEpiscopal and Reformed Jewish English academics, God is not a hallucinogen, butmore like a spiritually based, social contract.In his 1929 essay, Mysticism and Logic, Bertrand Russell noted mysticism’spreference for: (a) Insight over discursive analytic knowledge; (b) Belief in the unityof all things over oppositions or divisions in representational thought; (c) The denialof the reality of time, even in the divisions of past, present and future; (d) Belief thatevil is unreal, manufactured by the innate divisiveness in some analytic intellects. Inmodern brain hemispheric and other neuropsychological philosophies, thesecountervailing descriptions of external observables can grow naturally out of thebrain’s abilities to maintain logically incompatible perspectives simultaneously.Right-brain aesthetic holism in contrast with left-brain categorical analytics recalls apopular example. Would one chose Blake or Hume to better explain how the timedimensions of memory disappear with the scent of a past lover or the hearing of hisfavorite music for lovemaking.In the inevitable mix of primitive instinct with high purpose, the visitingprofessors’ Math House #2 had an aura of infamy. It was the one in which, by the170accidental intrusion of a campus security officer, the brilliantly eccentric NorthernCalifornia mathematician, Ralph Abraham, was famously arrested for pot smoking.The campus officer told me that, late one night, thinking he had smelled fire, heused his master key to make an unwelcome entrance. The incident became part ofthe record in House of Commons hearings about the intellectual and moral decay ofEnglish Universities. Apparently, even among English intellectuals, there were trivialand politicized definitions of virtue.Christopher Zeeman, the head of the Mathematics Institute was a worldclasstopologist who, among other things, demonstrated biological and socialpsychologicalapplications of Rene Thom’s Catastrophe Theory. I was invited as abrain person and amateur mathematician, to see what might result from mixing mewith members of his fine mathematics faculty. In addition to learning somebifurcation and lots of ergodic (statistical) theory, my chats with Christian andJewish mathematicians on Saturday and Sunday morning visits to the synagoguesand chapels of Oxford and Cambridge introduced me to an English intellectual’sreligious tradition. The spirit of C.S. Lewis was still very much alive. Surprising,however, was that more than a few of these scholars had the elements of Christianfaith in full menu: virgin birth, incarnation, crucifixion, resurrection, original sin andthe promise of salvation. I was disabused of my belief that these elements ofChristian belief were incompatible with high mental capacity and intellectualsophistication.Yet, the spiritual climate of these English intellectual Christians were differentfrom today’s post, post Vietnam return of the religious themes of the turn of theTwentieth Century, big tent revivalism and Billy Sunday’s brand of Christian patrioticAmerica. Today’s religious patriotism infuses George W. Bush’s Republican base,National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice’s after dinner hymns and AttorneyGeneral John Ashcroft’s early morning bible study groups for his Assistant AttorneyGenerals. Even the most religious of my English math buddies are without whatseems like adventitious baggage of today’s faith based Republicans: the belief inthe immorality and godlessness of teaching evolution in schools, what has beencalled the massacre of the innocents in stem cell research and abortion clinics, the171right to bear machine guns and the intrinsically venal sinfulness of a man’scommitment in love of another man. Was the clustering of these apparently diverseconcerns the accidental result of a sociopolitical-religious short circuit, a classresentment-drivenspiritual split in geographic, socioeconomic and educationalclass? Tim LeHay is selling millions of books, whole tables full at Wal-Mart’s, whichcome packaged with these assumptions.Surely higher-level theists would make today’s evil more subtle, abstract andpervasive, perhaps involving inner life themes of envy, vengeance and aggression;goodness implicating empathically made moral choices involving interpersonalkindness and evidence of caring about the well being of others. My contact withsome English academicians taught me that even the mathematics of hard sciencecan be viewed as a gift of grace and belief in the possibility of a continuallyemerging, Christ-centered, evolutionary process. Protestant philosophermathematician Alfred North Whitehead in his 1926 Religion in the Making, Catholicanthropologist priest, Pierre Teilhard de Chardin in his The Phenomenon of Manand the more modern process theologists of New York’s Union TheologicalSeminary do not exclude Christ’s involvement in evolving science and other newknowledge. They see Him participating in a spiritual evolutionary progress whichdoes not gather the barnacles of irrational ideas about the murder of less thanhundred-cell blastula or the psychoneurohormonally determined sexual partnerpreference. They know about the ever-changing cultural and political appearancesof faux and real evil. Nonetheless, what I learned from my Christian and Jewishfriends at the mathematics institute was that, though the definitions of evil maychange, evil as a construct and spiritual mechanism is an apparently essentialcomponent of the Christian experience. On Rosh Hashanah, even the reformedJews commit themselves to Teshuvah, making up for past evil deeds. The goodversus evil dichotomous view of man’s existence is true in the lives of Assembly ofGod Fundamentalists of Georgia as well as the sophisticated Readers, Professorsand Dons of the high Episcopal churches and university chapels of Oxford andCambridge.172Finding high-level mathematical thinkers at home in metaphysical surroundsand metaphysicians diligently practicing mathematics are certainly not new. Someinstructive examples include, famously, the Pythagoreans, the 15 th Century CatholicCardinal Nicholas Von Cusa, who used geometric symbols to record his spiritualphilosophy, and the Talmudic-Cartesian style of argumentation of Nicholas deSpinoza. This approach to an examination of metaphysical systems, sometimescalled mathematicism, exploits the machinery of the mathematical mind to evaluatethe consistency and completeness of thoughts, to create representative axiomaticstructures and to operate within them using syntactic calculus. The practice of therational dialectic of mathematicism, working for moral purity of heart, develops abrain-somatic discipline much like the exercises of Yoga.This approach flies in the face of the major premise of these essays, mybelief in the necessity of what William James and others have called the primaryreligious experience in order to know God. Recall that my father’s favorite Jewishmystic, Abraham Abulafia, said this experience gives birth to an activated mind thatcan then immediately and completely inform the Spirit. Among the religious Englishmathematicians, I learned that it doesn’t have to happen this way. One canapparently think oneself to It. A well known example of a modern theistic Oxfordtype, the Magdalene College English tutor and Don, C.S. Lewis, in his introductionto St. Athanasius’s The Incarnation of the Word of God, wrote, “…I believe thatmany who find that nothing happens when they sit down or kneel down with a bookof devotion, might find that their heart would sing unbidden while they are workingtheir way through a tough bit of theology with a pipe in their teeth and a pencil intheir hand…” In contrast, without my personal experiences with joyfultranscendence, the direct feeling of His presence, I would not have known about thegoals of his more analytic efforts. It was a struggle for me to use a rational mind toshare the meanings of the poetic ruminations in his BBC lectures, Mere Christianity.This Reader from Oxford with two firsts in Latin and Greek followed by another firstin English Literature, described the world as “…enemy occupied territory…” theomnipresence of the Good Power turned Dark Power of the Prince of Darkness andthe Christian as “…a man who is enabled to repent and pick himself up…”173For C.S. Lewis, religious faith came from intellectual hard work. He was putoff by spirituality that arrived by thoughtless fiat. He rejected the idea of living insimple and loving direct conversation with the God within, as described by BrotherLawrence. Lawrence was described as the simple “great awkward fellow who brokeeverything.” Lewis had little faith in what he perceived as the mindless spiritualmethodology of this selfless, silent, hard working Parisian monastery cook for ahundred fellow monks who was also their dedicated smelly sandal repairer. Perhapsreflecting his place in the British intellectual class system, Lewis wrote thatLawrence’s conversations and letters in the brief pamphlet, Practice of thePresence of God, “…full of truth… but unctuous and repulsive.” At the same time,Lewis spoke of his own experiential evidence for God in Surprised by Joy in whichhe admits, “I am an empirical theist. I have arrived at God by induction.” It is likelythat Brother Lawrence did not know and did not need to know the differencebetween an inductive and deductive argument.For most of my years, I have been a subject of Jamesian transcendentexperience, LSD expansive visions, Sufi moving meditation, long distance running,Black Baptist shouting, Tantric orgasmic withholding, Yiddish Labovicher dancing,Charismatic Christian Church rock and rolling, Hindi meditative rising Kundalini,almost any ecstatic crisis inducing, God type. Recall that I am from a generationthat a Donovan song inspired to smoke bananas. I did not personally accessBrother Lawrence’s calm, work-a-day, devotional, quietly persistent, perspectiveyielding, inner conversations with God until my sixth decade. The opportunity camefrom my growingly severe, unfixably chronic, pain. The counter-intuitive insight andhelpful identification was gained from reading about Joseph de Beaufort’sconversations with Brother Lawrence. Beaufort said Lawrence was born with thename Nicholas Herman in 1611 and renamed Lawrence in honor of his parishpriest. As young soldier in the Thirty Years War of the 17 th Century, he was severelyinjured. He was left with both sciatic nerves trapped between bone spurs and tissuescarring from his early twenties. These injuries, involving the two biggest painconductingnerves in the body, left him crippled in gait and in chronically severelower back and leg pain from which he would never be free. It was after this time174and a few years of looking for God in what he called “wondering in the wilderness”that he began his 40 years of monastery service as cook and sandal maker. He wasdescribed as amazingly selfless and a “…gentle man of joyful spirit…” who“…continually walked with God…not from the head but from the heart…” Doing longhours of selfless work with such painful disabilities, how was it that he maintainedhis joyful, loving and calm contact with God and his fellow man? How did he do it? Ifound that, as with all miracles of God contact for me, it happened by itself.I suffered my first testicular cancer in my thirties. I felt the little hard rock byaccident while scratching. It was on the left side. Surgical removal was followed bya five-hour radical abdominal lymph node dissection that left me with incidentalabdominal sympathetic nerve damage, urinary hesitancy and ejaculating backwardsinto my bladder. The tissue diagnosis was of embryonic cell carcinoma withchorionic elements. The U.S. Armed Service Pathology Department’s statisticalbook gave me 5% chance of living beyond two years. My second testicular canceroccurred in my fifties and on the right, two little joined lumps found by my wife. Itwas a seminoma with cure rate of 85% but requiring four weeks of almost daily x-ray treatment. The combination of radiation induced blood vessel scarring (they hadto blast widely since my earlier lymph node dissection confused the usualradiological anatomy), a pre-existing laterally curved spinal column and the arthriticchanges resulting from fifteen years of running over 10 miles per day with this kindof back led eventually to the degeneration and collapse of several of the bodies ofmy vertebrate pinching several leg nerves between bone spurs and radiationinducedscarring. I have been in increasingly severe back and leg pain for fifteenyears.It was in this way that I fell heir to both Brother Lawrence pain syndrome andwhat I now think was his strong inclination to live in the Spirit, as far as possibleoutside the concerns with his own mental and physical body. In my experience, thisled naturally to a decreased in my life long narcissistic preoccupations, diminishedmy ego-driven achievement desperation, setting up a more comfortable innerseating for conversations about and with God. The choice was between fullyembracing a God-oriented place for most of my daily existence or the chronic use of175enough narcotics to eliminate complexity of thought, real interpersonal feelings andhope for meaningfully creative work. The remarkable thing to me was that peoplebegan to talk about my “improved disposition,” an increase in out-of-mypsychiatrist’soffice personal empathy and kindness as well as a significantdecrement in my overweening, ego-stoking ambitious and competitive urges. Anyreturn to the earth body of tense readiness to competitively succeed, protect withego defensive anger, fantasies of assertive sexuality, stand tall grandiose notions ofintellectual superiority, even getting up for scientific combat, was accompanied bythe return to this world of pain. Only lovingly detached, unpretentious, otherdirected, quietly calm inner dialogue with Him was a place that I could live. This wasan inner land of still another kind of God than I had previously known. I could evenread and struggle with theological ideas thoughtfully, without referencing personalmystical, psychopharmacological, Holy Ghost-mimetic, experiences. I could enjoythe rational, social responsibility valuing, spiritual peace of a white ProtestantSunday morning service. I could attend Reformed Jewish Friday night servicesabout man’s responsibility to man without restless boredom. No longer seeking thefeeling of God’s thrill, I could think about it, even without being in the state of myfather’s and Abulafia’s activated mind.If I had been benefited with a classical language education beyond the highschool and early college Latin of Julius Caeser and Cicero or matriculated in anacademic theological seminary, I would have already studied, maybe even wornout, the deeper aspects of what seemed like a paradox of the consonance of faithand reason. I would have been familiar with the rhetorical argumentation in thepatristic Latin commentary on sacred texts by Tertullian and other Fathers of theearly Christian Church, the Talmudic discussions (the Mishna in Hebrew andGemora in Aramaic) of the oral Torah by the Rabbinate, the Muslim explication ofKoranic Islam in the oral tradition of the Hadith. Robert Wilken in his recent TheSpirit of Early Christian Thought was in no doubt about the harmonic relationshipbetween rationality and faith: “…by putting itself in the service of truth, faith enablesreason to exercise its power in realms to which it would otherwise have no176access…” It is perhaps strange to come to this common knowledge so late, but Icame to my life with my forbearers and father’s magical, mystical biases.My father had parodied what he thought was the “wasteful time” spent inrational, Talmudic discussion. He said that is what Jewish men spent their timedoing to avoid physical work while sitting near the city gates. It was the women whoraised the crops and cared for the cattle and children. He had a favorite conundrumsatirizing the village gate discussions. Jewish males, after the age of thirteen,accompany their morning prayer of commitment to loving and serving God with theritual of wrapping scripture embedded animal skin, tefillin, and winding them seventimes around the left arm, near the heart, and around the head, symbolizing themind. This contextualizes how my father made fun of a typical topic of these allmale Talmudic seminars: “If one had seven arms, would one wrap the tefillin oncearound each appendage or seven times about one of them. If the latter is the case,how would one chose which one.” In fact, there remains an on-going debate aboutthe order with which the embedded four passages from Exodus and Deuteronomyshould be arranged and inserted in the tefillin such that some compromisingorthodox Jews wear two types of tefillin, each representing one of the theoreticallyjustified orderings. I know now that there is an implicitly positive confirmation of ajointly held faith and feeling of ethnic belonging achieved by such apparentlyabstract discourse and argumentation.In truth, I had not come to Warwick to explore the relationships between faithand rationality using the cognitive style of mathematicism, but rather to be saved bythe mathematical miracles of the Brain God. Not unrelated to what C.S. Lewis sawas a prominent characteristic of spiritual experience, “wonder,” and what PhilipDavis and Reuben Hersh in their 1981 book, The Mathematical Experience, spokeof as “beauty” and “surprise.” I know about the attack of excitement that comes withthe sudden emergence of counterintuitive conceptual connections while exploringnew mathematical ideas. In energetic high, I start skip reading, underlining the bookfrantically, jotting commentary on the margins, copying the relevant equations intomy notebook. Was this the same break through to a glimmering of grace, everythingbeautifully in order and precious, that I experienced on LSD while sitting for hours177inside Paris’s towering, echoing, Notre Dame Cathedral, hearing Latin chants in thedank sweet smell of old church and chained, swinging canisters of smoking incenseas the pipe organ roared? Those realities that George Berkeley, the 1721 author ofTreatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge, the theist whose namewas given to a mostly agnostic Northern California city, saw as grounded in thespirituality of God’s infinite mind and broadcast as universal ideas through ourderivative, finite minds. Rational religion and mystical religion joined in faith by thepresence of implicit and universal mathematical structureI spent about two years at a mathematics institute in France, Institute desHautes Etudes, IHES, sitting at the guru feet of the mathematical great andmetaphysician, Rene Thom. His mathematical pallet was breathtakingly broad, ataste of what in past centuries was called natural philosophy and what seemed tome to be about the unapologetic geometrization of the Intuitive God of the Mind.Natalie Angiers, erstwhile mathematician, now reporter and atheistic hard ass,writing in the New York Times, called Thom’s ideas the talk of “…an Emperorwithout clothes…” The Kantian theme of the personal a priori status of an intuitivegeometry, an already in us representation of all that’s out there, was implicit in hisCatastrophe Theory research program and was published first in his classicalStructural Stability of Morphogenesis (1977) and made more overt in his later(1990) Semiophysics.To get a feeling for the rational-logical versus mystical-intuitive spiritual issuein a mathematical context, consider the following: most of us remember the struggleto unify the strange and difficult cognitive duality of the high school geometryexperience. On one hand, shapes and their relations and rearrangements could beintuitively grasped, even manipulated; on the other hand, we were taught that thesemental images and the results of their intuitive transformations were not to betrusted.In mathematics, as in my belief in the fireworks of primary religiousexperience, seeing is not necessarily believing. In my high school geometry class,what was to be believed was what followed from the proper practice of the tightlyorganized, Euclidean system of axioms, postulates and the derivative logical178operations resulting in the surety of proofs. The unresolved tension about what Ibelieved from intuitive experience and what I was allowed to believe from the logicof theorem and proof, perhaps not unlike my belief in the transcendent experienceover logical theological argument as Reality, continued throughout my life. Forexample, many decades later at IHES, I saw the world class dynamical systemstheorist and differential geometer-topologist, Dennis Sullivan, use a projector todisplay a computer-generated, intricate and beautiful, mathematical object, the wellknown, computer screen saver, Mandelbrot set. It represents the control parameterplane of the well studied complex analytic map, z → z 2 + c. Sullivan, pointing to asmall, discrete complicated little part of it that looked like a little version of the wholeof it, from a distance looking like a point, said, “An important Ph.D. dissertation iswaiting to be done on the question: is this (pointing to the little object) really there?”In the audience of about a hundred professional mathematicians and one amateur, Iwas the only one that laughed.Historians of mathematics point to the successful generalization of Euclidiangeometry via its abstract axioms, postulates and logical operations to a new, notnaturally intuitable, almost nonvisualizable, non-Euclidean geometry (with the newgeometric axiom, parallel lines do meet at infinity), as evidence against the Kantianidea of the intuitively accessible, a priori status of geometry. This served as anexample of where mathematics naturally resides, and argues in favor of the thoughtcontrol imposed by the modern set theoretic and logical rituals of mathematicaltheorem and proof. Thom, in a hereditary-evolutionary biological argumentdeveloped in Semiophysics, said “Objections raised to the Kantian apriority ofEuclidean geometry after the discovery of non-Euclidean geometries, and thetheories of twentieth century physics (restricted and general relativity, quantummechanics) appear to me to be irrelevant…they deal with …the infinitely small andinfinitely large…which lies outside the usual cognitive activity of ancient man.”In my discussions with him, Thom found equivalence relations betweenmental and real world objects and their behaviors. He described what he called anabstract physicalist truth that describes a psychic universe, which, in turn, simulatesoutside things and processes. Much like the transcendent experiential God I have179experienced, seek and think I know about, Thom was not after the logical proofs ofgeometry but rather viewed mathematical theorem and proof work as activityderived from intuitive experience with geometric relations as the thought forms thatrepresented real Reality. Though a Field’s Medal winner in mathematics (recall thatit is the Nobel Prize in mathematics awarded every four years at the InternationalCongress of Mathematics) and for his life time, one of the most brilliant and fecundmathematicians in the world, so many mathematicians admit that they got the seedsof their life work from his throw away remarks, Thom, with a little smile and his eyestwinkling, admitted to me with apparent pleasure that “I have never proven anytheorem in my life.” All his discoveries came from insightful moments of grace andthe courage to pursue them. Riding back from Paris late one night on a train thatdidn’t stop at IHES’s town of Bures sur Y’vette, I watched him use the redemergency phone to call the train’s engineer to stop the train suddenly for our exit. Iloved him, in part, because he had the courage to believe in and act on my kind ofintuitively realizable, experiential God.In keeping with his characteristic style of generalizing mathematical systemsbeyond their carefully defined specifics, Thom defined the concept of singularityvery broadly, speaking of them as distinctive and noteworthy things, points wherethe usual or expected properties, laws and definitions fail, where smooth andcontinuous processes become discontinuous. For Thom, these were the settings forthe unexpected and miraculous. He believed that his work and that of many others,now and in the future, would indicate that the set of miraculous singularities werefinite, systematic, universal and describable. Most importantly for our purposes,Thom believed them to be archetypal. It was through the structure of archetypalsingularities that he regarded inside and outside realities as mutually reflective.I was blessed by hours of discussion with him during his car travels tolecture around France. Thom often asked me to accompany him as he drove fromIHES to various branches of the University of Paris. He used these times toexercise my geometrically flavored, mathematical intuitions. He used words tocreate visualizable structures without the diagrammatic aid of a blackboard. Heused mental topological structures created by the properties of imagined motions,180flows, which led to examples of some of his universal singularities that he claimedcould be found in all real physical, biological and psychological systems. For someexamples: One of his archetypal singularities was a boundary at x = 0 such that theflow couldn’t spread from where it was in x ≥ 0 into x< 0 and was therefore like theborder, the membrane, between the inside and outside of a cell as well as thehoped for sociopolitical functions of the Great Wall of China and the Maginot Line. Ifwe were to blow up the boundary line from two to three dimensions, R2 →R 3 , thestraight boundary line becomes a cylinder for directionally organizing andconnecting flows as in blood vessels, oil pipes, cables and wires. Since productionand delivery need not occur at similar rates, temporary storage is required and maytake the form of a spherical blow-up in the vertical segment of R 3 leading to an openbottle which may serve as a dead end storage branch of a network of connectedcylinders. In the conceptual reductionism of Semiophysics, Thom said, “…life isessentially a question of embankment, canalization and the struggle to stemdispersion.” These structures of mind and world are built and maintained.Coagulation of blood is an example of a canalized fluid repairing gaps like atubeless tire. Thom considered apparent the problem of making something fromnothing, birth, that of finding the hidden sources: the bubbling spring emerges froman unseen, underground network of canalized fluid flow converging on the apparentsource, birth being the invisible becoming visible. In contrast, a canalized flowemptying into lake can represent disappearance as a flow.Mathematicians from all over the world attended Thom’s 65 th birthdaycelebration at IHES. His Field’s Medal winning work on the topology of differentiable(smooth) manifolds, cobordism and related ideas, was mentioned frequently, andgreat homage paid to him with respect to these areas of his work. However, in twodays of lectures of personal and professional tribute by the world’s greatmathematicians, his work relevant to Catastrophe Theory and Semiophysics wasnot mentioned, even once. The form taken by mathematicians’ most severejudgments is silence. As the New York Times’ Natalie Angier’s comments indicated,this is not the time for the intuitive conduct of applied mathematics.181It was upon Thom’s recommendation, that I spent the year in theMathematics Institute in Warwick, England. Using the Math House #2 s home base,I made many trips to Oxford University and a few to Cambridge. It was in theseplaces that I learned first hand that belief in the Resurrection was not simply amatter of socioeconomic class. I tried to schedule my trips to Oxford or Cambridgeto coincide with the weekend so I could hear the remarkably literate sermons at theUniversities college chapels. In these places, for hundreds of years, just becauseone was a top-notch practitioner of mathematics or linguistics did not mean that theDon did not have within him the full panoply of beliefs attendant to the ChristianGod.Maybe this easy combination of logic and Spirit derives from the character ofEnglish mathematics. There are graduates with professorially enfranchising Mastersof Art Degrees in Mathematics from Cambridge University where the subject isconsidered by many to be part of the culture of the humanities, closely akin tophilosophy and linguistics.. In the universities of United States, for example theMassachusetts Institute of Technology, an academic degree of Ph.D. inmathematics is seen by most faculty as an indication of the intellectual equipmentrequired for a life of scientific work in which disconfirmable experiments are theultimate criteria for knowledge. The field of pure mathematics (not ostensiblyrelevant to the real world outside the mind) has itself evolved in this direction.Recently, a physical scientist, a theoretical physicist, Edward Witten, was given themathematician’s ultimate award, the Field’s Medal. In American universities ingeneral, very few mathematics departments are in schools of the humanities. Mostare in the schools of science. This variation in bureaucratic, metaphysical, sortingreflects our continuing struggle with the true nature of reality and the role ofmathematics in its knowing. The now emergent field of computer science removesmathematics even further from intuition and Spirit. Difficult problems such as proofsof theorems can be systematically examined for all possibilities quickly by tryingthem out in what is now known as a computational proof. On the other hand,pointing at this computation’s graphics, the theorem and proof, real mathematicianscan ask, is this really there?182Mentioned briefly above was one of humankind’s beacons, Pythagoras, theintellectual and spiritual progenitor of Plato. He taught the disciples of thePythagorean Brotherhood in Crotona, Italy, that reality at its deepest level wasmathematical thought. Studies there included philosophy, geometry, music andastronomy, all at the service of achieving closer union with the Divine. Pythagorasand his school, only his student’s writings remain, was said to be working at unifyingelements of the ancient tribal mystery cults with the observables of worldly eventsthrough meditative, mathematical, philosophical mysticism. Knowledge was gainedthrough spiritual intuition made harmonious with formal systems of thought. As Platolater said and as quoted by Thomas Heath in his 1921 History of GreekMathematics, about the study of the motion of stars, “…leave the heavens alone…”because what one sees is only an approximation of the real and more perfectmathematical structures involving points, lines and circles. To which Newton addedan elongated circle, the ellipse, and Nineteenth and Twentieth Centurymathematicians and physicists, the geometries of positively and negatively curvedspace.It is perhaps not an accident that debates about evidence for the existenceand location of God and where the ideas and structures of mathematics live andbreath generally involves a stand off between those that believe that both are outthere and can be seen, like thoughtful, humanistic actions and caring service forneedful others, versus those that feel the phenomenology of both are projections ofthe psychobiologically intuitive Brain God and can be felt like an ecstatic rush ofinsightful illumination.Further Reading for Faith And RationalityIntroduction of Comparative Mysticism. Jacques De Marquette, PhilosophicalLibrary, N.Y. 1949,183Mysticism and Logic. Bertrand Russell. Norton. N.Y. 1929.Sefer shel Devarium (The Book of Words). Lawrence Kushner, Jewish Lights,Woodstock, Vermont. 1998.Semiophysics: A Sketch, Aristotelian Physics and Catastrophe Theory. Rene Thom.Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA. 1990.Mere Christianity. C.S. Lewis. MacMillan, N.Y. 1952.Sacred Geometry. Miranda Lundy. Walker, N.Y. 1998.Fractals, Form, Chance and Dimension, B.B. Mandelbrot, Freeman, San Francisco,1977.Non-Euclidean Geometry, H.S.M. Coxeter, University of Toronto Press, Toronto,1957.Fundamentals of Mathematics, Vol. I. H. Behnke, F. Bachmann, K. Fladt and W.Suss, MIT Press, Cambridge. 1983.Religion Explained, The Evolutionary Origins of Religious Thought. Pascal Boyer.Basic Books, N.Y. 2001.Catastrophe Theory. Alexander Woodcock and Monte Davis, Dutton, N.Y. 1978.It Must Be Beautiful; Great Equations of Modern Science. Graham Farmelo, Granta,London, 2002.Neurobiological Barriers to Euphoria. Arnold J. Mandell, American Scientist 61: 565-573, 1973.184Brain Physics and the Respiritualization of Healing. Arnold J. Mandell, Bulletin ofthe National Guild of Catholic Psychiatrists. 28:19-24, 1983.Toward a Psychobiology of Transcendence, God in the Brain. Arnold J. Mandell, InPsychobiology of Consciousness (eds. J.M. Davidson and R.J. Davidson). Plenum,N.Y. 1980.185APPENDIXAN INTUITIVE GUIDE TO THE IDEAS AND METHODS OF DYNAMICALSYSTEMS FOR THE LIFE SCIENCESArnold J. Mandell and Karen A. SelzBiological Scientists Can Understand and Use Ideas and Methods ofNonlinear ScienceA yield of advances in computer hardware and software is that even quitedifficult applied nonlinear mathematics can become accessible to experimentallyoriented biological scientists. Before this time, the development and analysis of aparticular set of nonlinear differential equations, describing the actions of aneurobiological system in motion, involved decades of specialty training, rare insightand many hours of highly skilled, trial and error computations by hand. Since theidiosyncrasies of each nonlinear system were considered unique, the results of theiranalyses were thought to concern only the particular nonlinear system beingstudied. Often a shift in hypothetical mechanism meant starting the long and painfulprocess all over again. In addition, these findings were usually communicated onlyto a small and arcane mathematical community in the form of dense theorems anddifficult to follow proofs, insurmountable language barriers to biological researcherswishing to use them to better describe and understand their experimentalobservations.For today’s neuroscientist with a desktop computer, an inclination to programand access to computer algebra and numerical software such as Maple,Mathematica or MatLab, operational definitions and computational empiricism canreplace the theorem and proof continuity required to do old style appliedmathematics. For those of us without sufficient facility in algebraic manipulation toeasily follow the arguments of professional mathematicians, a computer algebraprogram such as Maple serves as a delightfully accessible consultant with which to“check out what the guy is saying". Those motivated enough to write their own datagenerating or analytic programs in C, Fortran, Pascal or Basic (though not186essential) can find easy-to-use algorithmic help in Cambridge University Press’sNumerical Recipes series (Press et al, 1991).The conceptual and communication gaps between applied mathematiciansand physicists and the bench practitioners of the neurosciences, that inevitably leadone or the other, most often both, to surrender their deepest intuitions to jointlyshared images that are inevitably more simplistic, are no longer inevitable. With herown hands on both the quantitative conjectural and experimental machinery, themotivated practicing neuroscientist can honor her own insights, read about andconstruct symbolic representations from her intuitions and do her own quantitativetheory. Computerized numerical techniques have become so powerful andaccessible that, even in academic settings, there is debate about whetherfundamental analytic tools, such as series expansions, should be taught inundergraduate courses about differential equations.The practice of “try it and see what happens", with the current name ofexperimental, computational mathematics, is accessible to all. In addition to thepowerful general mathematical programs noted above, there exist several sets ofmore specifically targeted software with the capacity to generate, portray andquantify the behavior of nonlinear continuous and discrete abstract and realdynamical systems. These often also include algorithmic modules that are useful intailoring new models and measures (see for examples, Parker and Chua, 1989;Baker and Gollub, 1991; Nusse and Yorke, 1991; Sprott and Rowlands, 1991;Sprott, 1993; Korsch and Jodl, 1994; Enns and McGuire, 1997). Learning from andusing this software, along with only a little programming in the high level languagesand computer algebra programs listed above, permit the non-mathematicianneuroscientist, willing to read in the literature such as that described below, to doindependent, cutting edge research in applied dynamical systems.Described below will be the computational discoveries in abstract systemsand real neuroscientific data that have led to multiple contexts of quantitativedescription. These include those that are: (1) Geometric and conserve metricdistances; (2) Topological and conserve relative positions but not distances; (3)Single or multiple global quantitative descriptors such as scaling numbers or scaling187number spectra; (4) Non-Gaussian distributions with heavy tails and correlationsreflected in their Hurst, Fano, Allan and Levy exponents; (5) Statistical dynamicaldescriptions of trajectories of the system in their embedding space such asLyapounov exponents, Hausdorff-Mandelbrot dimensions, Sinai-Ruelle-Bowenmeasures, and Adler-Weiss-Ornstein topological and metric entropies.Characteristics which discriminate between experimental versus controlconditions in parametric computational and real physiological and pharmacologicalexperiments serve to generate and test ideas and imagery arising out of behaviorobserved in both biological and abstract dynamical realms. New experiments canbe suggested by the implicative structure of dynamical systems theory as well asneurobiological findings and intuitions. As examples, the sudden “switch” of manicdepressivebipolarity syndromes may be a “bifurcation” in nonlinear dynamicalsystems; the “noise” of the statistical physicist may be the “arousal” of the brainstem-thalamic biogenic amine and reticular formation neurophysiologist; aspects of“thought disorder” in the pathophysiology of schizophrenic patients may be anentropic sequencing idiosyncrasy in the “symbolic dynamics” of a particular brainsystem attractor; neuronal “bursting” may be the “intermittency” of a neurodynamicalsystem; a multiplicity of “discrete ion channel conductances” may be a single “globalscaling hierarchy” of conductances times. The number of published examples of thisfusion of ideas and methodology in the biological-relevant literature is already in theseveral hundreds and Medline counts indicate is growing exponentially.Representative samples of these are described below.In addition to the technological advances in computational hardware andsoftware, the major scientific surprise making this new era possible is the discoveryof universalities, the finite set of behaviors characteristic of most, if not all nonlinearsystems, across most if not all of the specific equations or neural systems beingexplored. This makes the emergence of semi-quantitative equivalence relationsbetween model and data not only possible but likely, even though we don’t now andperhaps never will know enough to either write or solve completely the specific anddetailed equations for the biological system of interest. We neuroscientists need notbe apologetic for using these ideas and tools qualitatively and empirically. In fact,188unanticipated results of analog and digital computer experiments were responsiblefor most if not all of the discoveries underlying the current era’s revolution in appliednonlinear mathematics.Modern Applied Dynamical Systems Emerged from AccidentalComputational DiscoveriesA medical student named Herr, in his thesis research with the “radioengineer”, Van der Pol (1926), was simulating cardiac electrophysiology with ananalog device which permitted real time, exploration of a full range of parametervalues long before there were fast enough digital processors to do so. Studying thebehavior of equations of a periodically, pace maker, driven, nonlinear triodeoscillator, Herr found orbital points that appeared to belong to two different periodssimultaneously thus violating the uniqueness of solutions of differential equationtheory. The Van der Pol relaxation oscillator equations, with their slow buildup andsudden discharge of membrane potential are good models for the slow-fastprocesses of repolarization and depolarization of Hodgkin-Huxley type equations(Rinzel, 1985). Periodically driven, nonlinear differential equations of the Van derPol type are generally applicable to the multiplicity of dynamical regimes of neuronaldynamics (Carpenter, 1979; Aihara et al, 1984; Chay and Rinzel, 1985) and, withperiodic and aperiodic driving and noise, can be made relevant to particularmammalian neuronal subsystems in the context of clinically relevant globalelectrophysiological phenomena such as Magoun’s (1954) brain stem evoked EEGand behavioral arousal (Nicolis, 1986; Selz and Mandell, 1992; Mandell and Selz,1993).In the early 1940’s, using the pre-publication results of similar analogcomputer studies (Levinson, 1949), the Cambridge mathematicians, MaryCartwright and Joe Littlewood (1945; McMurran, S., Tattersal, J.,1999) usedgeometric methods to prove that the highly nonlinear, periodically driven Van derPol equations, depending upon one or two changing parameters, generated fixedpoint (“homeostatic”), periodic (“cyclic”), subharmonic (“period doubling”),quasiperiodic (“multiply periodic”), intermittent (“bursting”) and “deterministically189random” patterns. We now know such phenomena to be universal characteristics ofbifurcation scenarios in nonlinear dynamical systems where bifurcation meansdiscontinuous changes in patterns of behavior (dependent variables) resulting fromsmooth changes in parameters (independent variables). Alerted to their presence incomputer experiments with biologically relevant nonlinear differential equations,these phenomena have since been found in time series from patch clampedmembrane channels, single neurons, neuronal networks, neuroendocrine systems,brain waves and patterns of behavior in animals and man (see below). Cartwright-Littlewood found that the inner and outer edges of the domains of attraction (all theinitial values that eventually wind up in the attractor—the limit set of all boundedsolutions) of two different sets of subharmonic periods for the same parametersettings were interlaced at many scales in what is today called a fractal basinboundary. It was in this way that the specific values of the end state are understoodto be indeterminate since the starting values in the fractal basin boundary areimpossible to isolate and specify with adequate experimental precision.Similar biologically-relevant analog computer discoveries about the Van derPol and comparable periodically forced, dissipative (energy utilizing) Duffingequations (Zeeman, 1976) were made in the early 1960’s by electrical engineer,Yoshi Ueda (1992), but his thesis director, Chihiro Hayashi of Japan’s KyotoUniversity, was sufficiently disturbed by this evidence for the existence of boundedsolutions (attractors) that were neither fixed points (equilibria) nor periodic orbits(cycles), the only ones known at the time and therefore “strange,” that he refused tolet Ueda publish his findings until he did so as an independent investigator in the1970’s.In the early 1960’s, Edward Lorenz (1963), a meteorologist and student ofthe Harvard mathematician and dynamical systems pioneer, George Birkoff (1922),was computing the output of a very reduced subset of Saltzman’s differentialequations for predicting the weather (1962). Lorenz found that numericallyintegrated trajectories manifested unpredictable times and directions of motionbetween the two spiral orbits of what has come to be known as the Lorenz attractor.Very small differences in starting values led to widely diverse final values, and, just190as importantly, far apart initial values could be found close together in the limit set.This behavior was called “sensitivity to initial conditions” by David Ruelle (1978;Ruelle and Takens, 1971). It is noteworthy, however, that over a range of values ofthe parameters, the overall pattern of the orbits of the Lorenz attractor results incharacteristic geometric pictures as well as invariant statistical descriptors.Qualitative and quantitative global similarities were gained while specific solutionswere lost in these “strange attractors” of nonlinear systems. Analog computersimulation of a simpler set of equations inspired by nonlinear chemical reactionkinetics led to the discovery by Rössler (1976) of another early and generic strangeattractor combining sensitivity to initial conditions and characteristic geometries andmeasures.It was the Russian mathematicians, A.N. Kolmogorov (1957), Sinai (1959)and V.I. Arnold (Arnold and Avez, 1968), the French mathematicians, Rene Thom(1972) and David Ruelle (1978) and the U.C. Berkeley mathematicians, SteveSmale (1967) and his student, Rufus Bowen (1975), and their associates whogathered together these and other related computational discoveries and embeddedthem in a qualitative theory of nonlinear differential equations, using a variety offormalisms, including point set and differential topology, geometry, analysis andergodic (having an invariant statistical description) measure theory that formallyestablished the fundamentals for research in nonlinear dynamical systems. Here adynamical system refers generally and simply to the components and nonlinearprocesses (transformations) that move points (values) in discrete (“map”) orcontinuous (“differential equation”) time around in an appropriately defined space.The phrase, “nonlinear transformation” in this context does not imply easily solvablecurved functions, such as those representing the sigmoid kinetic or thresholdfunctions of enzymes and neuronal networks or those that smoothly log transformthe amplitudes of auditory or other sensory modalities in man, but rather allude toexpressions containing products, powers and functions of the computational and/or3experimental variables , such as xx , ( x ior si n( x).x i1 2)191As noted above, the cross-disciplinary cohesiveness of such a vaguelydefined field occurred as the result of the unanticipated discovery of a relativelysmall set of nonlinear phenomena, universalities, that implicated many fields ofmathematics, from differential geometry to number theory, and were found in abroad range of physical and biological realizations, from turbulent plasmas andchemical and enzymatic reactions to neuroendocrine hormone release patterns. It isperhaps counter-intuitive but, whereas linear systems can generate an infinitenumber of solutions locating points anywhere the person writing the equationswants them to go, nonlinear systems are generally restricted to a finite set of globaldynamics and these emerge on their own from the intrinsic dynamics of the system.Trying to make these systems follow orders, not unlike finding the most clinicallyeffective dosage range of a psychopharmacological agent, require the empiricism oftrial and error experiments.A second class of computational accidents involving nonlinear systemsresulted in unanticipated coherence rather than unpredictable disorder. Using oneof the early “high speed” digital computers at Los Alamos, MANIC I, Enrico Fermiwith Pasta and Ulam (1955) attempted to obtain a many-body statisticalthermodynamic equilibrium analogous to heat generated noise by coupling 64particles together with nonlinear springs. They found only a few low period modesthat oscillated indefinitely. Instead of equidistribution of the energy into 128 degreesof freedom (64 locations × 64 velocities in 128 dimensional phase space), theyfound it gathered up into only few coherent modes. Although the relevance tobiological science of nonlinear multifrequency coherence is a bit off from our focus,it is worthwhile noting that a recent (Karhunen-Loeve) decomposition of the alphaband of the resting alert human EEG revealed only three dominant temporal–spatialmodes: anterior-posterior, rotational and standing (Friedrich et al, 1991) and “fewfrequency coherence” is a frontier of inquiry in brain wave research.A heterogeneous collection of coupled nonlinear elements in the form ofwidely distributed, multi-location, multifrequency systems such as cross-cortical,brain stem-thalamic-cortical and interconnected spinal motor neurons can generate192coherent activity. This temporal and phase coherence plays an important role incurrent theory of sensory-associative-motor integrative function, how distributedattributions come together in the brain representation of a single object or process,in the context of the so-called “binding problem” (Singer, 1993; Bressler, 1995;Nicolelis, 1995; Schiff et al, 1997). Diffusely distributed neurochemical variableshave been invoked. For example, the role of metabotropic glutamate receptors indriving the synchronization of interneuronal networks has been suggested as amechanistic model (Whittington et al, 1995). The objects of relevance to thediscovery of Fermi-Pasta-Ulam are studied as the nonlinear physics ofnondissapative wave processes and are called solitons (Zabusky and Kruskal,1965). They have been invoked to model nerve conduction and informationtransport in brain (Scott, 1990).A third counter-intuitive set of accidental computational findings is in an areaof research called symbolic dynamics which involves the universal parameterdependentcoding language and capacity of nonlinear systems. In the early 1960’s,a group around Stan Ulam at Los Alamos (Cooper, 1987) used one of the early“high powered” computers, MANIAC II, to iterate (letting the output of the action of adiscrete time function serve as its input the next time around) simple equations theycalled “maps.” These reduced dimensional objects shaped like tents, sine functionsand parabolas can be extracted from and represent the behavior of higherdimensional, nonlinear differential equations (see Devaney, 1989; Schuster, 1989 orMoon, 1992 for intuitive descriptions). They varied a parameter, such as the heightof the tent or parabola, to systematically change the period and/or phase (order) ofthe symbol sequence (Metropolis et al, 1973). Normalizing the range of values ofthe output to [0,1] and transforming the series of values into a binary code, L ≤ 0.5and R > 0.5, they found an invariant, one parameter dependent, progression ofordered periods, R, RLR, RLRR…RLLRL…, in all such single maximum maps. This“U (universal)sequence” has also been found as singly or multiply present in avariety of real systems, including complicated chemical reactions (Simoyi et al,1982; Coffman et al, 1986). This means one can “dial” the parameter to generate“words” of sufficient computational complexity to serve as a language. These193computer experimental findings had already been anticipated in a remarkablemathematical proof by Sharkovskii (1964).The dynamical richness of these simple, single maximum, one dimensionalmaps was computationally explored in the context of ecological and epidemiologicalissues in the classical studies of Robert May (1976). It has been possible to relatethe individually characteristic L, R sequence behavior of human subjects on acomputer task to a unique parameter of a tent map generating those sequenceswhich predicted age and discriminated subclinical obsessive compulsive fromborderline syndromes (Selz and Mandell, 1993). The dynamical entropy ofunstructured L,R behavior also discriminated a population of schizophrenic patientsfrom normals (Paulus et al, 1996). More generally, parameter dependent dynamicalcoding, built into the universal behavior of its constitutive equations, is a mechanismwith which a nonlinear dynamical system, such as nerve membrane equations asabove, or in the aggregate, the middle layer of a completely connected neuralnetwork, can encode, Morse code-like, messages (Paulus et al, 1989).Bifurcations in Biologically Relevant Dynamical SystemsBifurcations, “splitting into (two) branches,” are observed over a smoothchange in control parameter(s) (independent variables), as a discontinuous andqualitative change in the dynamical (time-dependent) pattern of the observable(Guckenheimer and Holmes, 1993; Wiggens, 1990; see Strogatz, 1994, for aparticularly intuitive description). Qualitative here means how the dynamics of thetrajectory appear as a geometric-topological (relative shaped not necessarily sized)pattern in phase space. In such a space, the orbital points are located along the x-axis by their value, x at time t, and along the y-axis by their time rate of change atthat t, dx . To visualize a representative phase portrait in the plane, start bydtimagining the pattern made by mass hanging on a linear spring at rest asdxrepresented by a point centered at x = 0, y = = 0. When perturbed from rest, thedt194phase portrait of the motion of this “harmonic oscillator,” is composed of a(continuous) series of points representing its location, graphed along x , its rate ofmotion graphed along , y =dx dx. x anddt dtco-localize the circular orbit as it speedsup and slows down while it bobs up and down. The transition from a fixed point (themass at rest) to a circle (the bobbing mass), a bifurcation in phase space, results inthe loss of topological equivalence. That is, the phase space geometries before andafter the bifurcation cannot be smoothly distorted into each other. Continuity andconnectedness of the space is lost. For topological equivalence, stretching, bendingand warping are allowed but not tearing apart and/or gluing together. Following thebifurcation of a fixed point into a circle, even limitless shrinking of the ring leaves ahole. The appearance or disappearance of an equilibrium fixed point (called a“saddle-node” bifurcation), splitting into two (“period doubling” bifurcation), itsexploding into a circle (“Hopf” bifurcation to a limit cycle), a circle splitting into two ormore incommensurate cycles (“secondary Hopf” bifurcation) and these multiperiodic(“quasiperiodic”) dynamics breaking down into a recursive spirals (“homoclinicbifurcation to chaos”) are among the common bifurcations in nonlinear dynamicalsystems, and all of them have been observed in many neurobiological settings.In the forced-dissipative (energetically driven and energy consuming)dynamical systems relevant to the neurosciences---this characteristic contrasts withthe dissipation free momentum of the classical mechanics of astrophysical bodies---there are four “most generic” bifurcation scenarios as a parameter changes thatmay, but need not, lead to chaos (see below for definition) (for early and physicallyoriented treatments see Eckmann, 1981; Ott, 1981; Berge′ et al, 1984, Kaneko,1983). These scenarios are: (1) Fixed point or cycle splittings into twice-as-longperiod lengths 1→2→4→8→16…called the subharmonic or “period doubling route”;(2) The transformation of fixed points to one and then more periodic orbits, multipleindependent (nonharmonic, incommensurate) frequency oscillations, their modelockings and then breakdown called the “quasiperiodic route”; (3) Fixed point orcyclic equilibria metamorphosed into irregular bursting patterns called the“intermittency route”; and (4) In the context of quasiperiodic dynamics, adjacent195nonharmonic frequency encoding parameter spaces fusing, resulting in new periodsthat are the sums of their adjacent ones: period 2 + period 3 = period 5, in what iscalled the “period adding route”. Technically precise classification of bifurcationsinvolve much more careful definitions and well studied technical constraintsinvolving such issues as the symmetries and dimensionality of the system ofobservables, how many control parameters (“codimensions”) are required toreasonably realize the bifurcation and the particular way the fixed points of thesystem become unstable, all of which are directly explorable when the equationsare known or can be hypothetically inferred from the qualitative behavior of realdata.We note a few examples from the wide variety of bifurcating systems thatcan be found in the biomedical literature of interest for the biological sciences. Withsubstrate input rate as the bifurcation parameter, the phosphofructokinase regulatedglycolytic cycle in yeast extract was found to change among steady state, periodicand period doubling (subharmonic) regimes (Boiteux et al, 1975). Transitionsbetween steady state, oscillatory and chaotic patterns have been reported in varietyof physiological measures in man including respiratory rhythms and circulatingblood cell concentrations over time (Mackey and Glass, 1977; Glass and Mackey,1988 ) and models of dopamine cell dynamics (King et al, 1984). Flow rateparameter sensitive periodic, bursting and chaotic behavior has been found in aperoxidase-oxidase system (Olsen and Degn, 1977). A brain enzyme, substantianigral dopaminergic tyrosine hydroxylase, manifested different saturation andfluctuation patterns, including bursting and periodicity, in experiments in which low(physiological) levels of tetrahydrobiopterin cofactor were the bifurcation parametersand adrenergic drugs were used as modulators (Mandell and Russo, 1981).All four of the generic bifurcation routes to chaos, period doubling, changingmultifrequency (quasiperiodicity), period adding and bursting (called “intermittency”)were observed in self-sustained oscillations induced in the neural membranes ofspace clamped, giant squid axons that were immersed in a 550mM NaCl, andelectrically stimulated over changing amplitudes and frequencies (Aihara et al,1986; Takahashi et al, 1990). With external stimulus current level as the control196parameter, the R15 cell of the abdominal ganglion of the Aplysia demonstratestransitions between bursting and periodic modes as well as period doubling, asignatory period 3 and the Lyapounov characteristic exponent evidence (see below)for the discontinuous onset of chaos (Canavier et al, 1990). Manipulating feed backdelay, the human pupillary light reflex will bifurcate into regular oscillations (Miltonand Longtin, 1990). A transition between a regime of irregular discharging tooscillatory bursting behavior was induced in basal forebrain cholinergic neurons byneurotensin (Alonso et al, 1994). Sympathetic nerve discharge in decerebrate,ventilated cats demonstrated transitions between periodic, multiple periodic(quasiperiodic with changing ratios to the ventilation frequency) and subharmonicbehavior in response to inferior vena cava occlusion, vagotomy, aortic constrictionand spinalization (Porta et al, 1996). Period adding bifurcations were induced bychanging calcium concentrations or the addition of a potassium channel blocker inthe “pacemaker” formed when (rat) sciatic nerve is chronically injured (Ren et al,1997). Changing levels of the L-type calcium channel antagonist, verapramil, alterthe pattern of vasomotion of rabbit ear arteries among sets of multiple independentperiods, “quasi-periodicity,” mode locking and chaos (De Brower, 1998). At criticalintensity and frequency, flicker visual stimulation of the salamander generates apharmacologically modifiable period doubling bifurcation in their ganglion cells (onespike for every two flickers) which is also seen subjectively and in occipital lobeevoked potentials at critical frequencies in bright, full-field flickered humans (Crevierand Meister, 1998).Qualitative and Quantitative Universality in Nonlinear Dynamical Systems“Universality” (see above) entered the parlance of physics in the context ofthe statistical mechanics of phase transitions near their critical points (Stanley,1971; Stauffer, 1985; Yeomans, 1993) and has come to refer to the finite set oftransitions and quantities common to nonlinear systems arising in theirneighborhoods. A common physical example is the triple point of water-ice-steamon the temperature-pressure phase plane where a small change in temperature or197pressure leads to a global qualitative change in physical state. Analogously, the lossof topological equivalence occurs at the fixed point that, for examples, splits into twoor explodes into a cyclic orbit in phase space. The same critical point behaviors andquantities occur in a wide variety of specific processes and their equations, and theyare independent of the way the trajectories first arrived in the fixed pointneighborhood. Once the system enters the regime of critical behavior, the predictivesignificance of its dynamical history is lost. This may also be the case for emergentpsychiatric disorder (Mandell et al, 1985; Mandell and Selz, 1992; Ehlers, 1995;Paulus et al, 1996; Huber et al, 1999).There are diagnostic patterns of behavior when a nonlinear system is in aneighborhood of a potential bifurcation. They include sudden and/or large jumpsresulting from a small change in experimental conditions, the appearance of bigbaseline fluctuations (anomalously large variance), the lengthening of the timerequired to relax following evoked or spontaneous perturbation (‘”critical slowing”),the same global change in state occurring at different values of the parameter whenincreasing versus decreasing a parameter’s value (“hysteresis”), the existence ofsome range of values of the observable that cannot be attained by manipulation ofthe parameter (“inaccessibility”) and the availability of two or more distinct states inthe same parameter neighborhood (“modality”) (Thom, 1972; Arnold, 1984; Gilmore,1981). It is perhaps relevant to polydrug psychopharmacology and clinicalmanagement that the higher the co-dimension (the greater number of effectiveparameters being manipulated), the greater the accessibility and control of selectedstate stability becomes with respect to difficult to obtain behaviors. Examples of thepotential advantages of simultaneous manipulation of multiple influences have beendeveloped for affect disorder and anorexia nervosa (Callahan and Sashin, 1987).As evidence for the independence of critical behavior from specific history,the qualitatively universal bifurcations along the four canonical routes to chaosmanifest dimensionless ratios of parameter and phase space geometries betweenbifurcations. These ratios are quantitatively universal. The formalisms that rescalethe distances from fixed points in parameter and observable spaces result in thesame picture across scale, a dilatational symmetry (also called self similarity or198affinity). They are called renormalization group equations, and, with respect toprediction, they replace any or all of the original specific predictive equations for theparticular system under study (Cvitanovic′, 1989). Whereas the U sequence andcritical point behaviors are manifestations of qualitative universality, these scalingnumbers are manifestations of quantitative universality. We discuss them herebecause their omnipresence in computationally realized differential equations aswell as physical and chemical experiments along with their quantitative specificity(with values in all systems as “constant” as π) constitute a most persuasiveargument for the substantiality of modern dynamical systems approaches to brainand other biological research.The physical and physiological requirements for manifestations of theseuniversal bifurcation scenarios can appear to be remarkably minimal. In physics, forexample a full panoply can be observed in a “dripping faucet” (Shaw,1984).Similarly, a small piece of extirpated and perfused myenteric or femoral artery willdemonstrate these transitions in vasomotion spontaneously and almostindependent of flow rate (Stergiopulos et al, 1998).Feigenbaum discovered that in dynamical systems manifesting a series ofperiod doubling bifurcations, the ratio of the parameter value at which the nextperiod doubling bifurcation occurred relative to the last one ≈1… and the ratio4.6692of the magnitude of the spawning point to the one spawned ≈ 2.5. (Feigenbaum,1979). By “rescaling” distances along a parameter value (see below) using what iscalled a “universal renormalization operator” the geometric situation around eachbifurcation point (though of different absolute “size) remains relatively the same. Inintermittent systems, burst length varies as the inverse square root of the distanceof the value of the parameter from that value that elicited the fixed point (Mannevilleand Pomeau, 1980). The universal characteristic of the third common parametricroute to chaos, quasiperiodicity, is that the ratio of independent frequencies foundmost resistant to mode locking and breakdown into chaos is, ω i= 1.618… theωi+1number to which the ratio of adjacent Fibonocci numbers converge (1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13,19921…) (Shenker and Kadanoff, 1982). Similar quantitative scaling properties werealso discovered in the parametric period adding route (Kaneko, 1983).All of these scaling numbers have been found in experiments and inremarkable agreement with theory. Examples have been discovered in electroniccircuits, hydrodynamic and mercury flows, acoustic systems, laser dynamics andoscillating chemical reactions (see Cvitanovic′, 1989, for representative list ofreferences). Whereas qualitative evidence for all of these bifurcation scenarios havebeen found in brain relevant experiments, there is yet to be a bifurcatingexperimental biological system with adequate precision across a sufficient range ofmagnitudes such that quantitative universality could be demonstrated across asufficient range of values to be convincing. We remind ourselves that in order toestablish a Fiegenbaum number, each period doubling bifurcation of the severalrequired necessitates about a five-fold improvement in the experimenter’s ability tospecify the control parameter.Using Invariant Measures of Dynamical Neurobiological SystemsBefore the modern era of dissipatively forced (energy utilizing) dynamicalsystems research, the known attactors of an experiment’s initial values resultedfrom their convergence onto either a fixed point or a limit cycle. An attractor can beregarded as a set which remains in bounded space and to which all orbits in thisneighborhood converge (Milnor, 1985). Since by the rules of differential equations,orbits are required to be both smooth (graphable without lifting the pencil) andunique (different trajectories don’t intersect since the point of intersection would nolonger be unique), the foundational Poincare-Bendixon theorem says that any suchorbit confined to a two dimensional phase space that doesn’t converge to a fixedpoint must, no matter how long it irregularly wanders, must, eventually intersect withitself and then go around the same route again in a (perhaps very long) cycle. Inmost neuroscience research as well, we have generally regarded our data asmanifesting either tolerable (or intolerable) fluctuations around mean values (fixed200points) or more or less regular cycles. We analyze our “fixed point” data usingquantities such as the mean and variance of distributional statistics and the cycledata using the amplitude, frequency, cycle length and phase of trigonometricfunctions. In central tendency-oriented research, rare, very high amplitude eventshave usually been considered aberrations and tossed, and imperfect periodicbehavior is treated by “cosiner analysis” as regular cycles contaminated bymeasurement or system noise. Whereas technically, chaotic dynamics must live indimension greater than two (for orbits to be more than a fixed point or limit cycle,able to snake around without necessarily intersecting ), the Lorenz attractor hasdimension just a little over two, our difficulties with establishing the “true”physiological dimension of real biological observables (see below) makes such aconsideration more theoretical than practical.The orbits of a forced-dissipative dynamical system in a parameter regimeengendering chaos, converge onto an attractor which is neither a fixed point nor alimit cycle, thus the origin of the name “strange attractor” (Ruelle and Takens,1971). It was James Yorke that first named these dynamics “chaos” (Li and Yorke,1975). The necessarily statistical properties of the chaotic orbits on strangeattractors follow from the generic characteristics of their motions (see Shaw, 1981for a still conceptually current, non-mathematical treatment). These kinds ofstatistics are studied in a research context called the “ergodic theory of dynamicalsystems” (Ruelle, 1979; Eckmann and Ruelle, 1985). Ergodic is a word used tocharacterize a system with (or without) a particular condition placed on its statisticalmeasures: the existence of an invariant measure which is undecomposabile intotwo invariant measures and, equivalently (though not obviously) one in which thetime average equals its average in the geometric space into which it is embedded.One may arrive at the same ergodic measure from studying a single very long orbitor from summing across many individual but shorter orbits. This ergodicequivalence is made possible due to the definitional existence of at least oneinvariant statistical measure and the dynamics of the system which ideally include auniformly, sequence disordering process called “mixing” (see below).201Of course, most real biological dynamics are not uniformly mixing and so arenon-ergodic, but we shall see that the ways they fail to be ergodic (and thus remainin the conceptual context of ergodic measures) are descriptively useful (Mandelland Selz, 1997a). The emergence of many statistical approaches to characterizingthese motions have been accompanied by the expected controversies about whichis best or correct (see below) and have been applied to the problem of diagnosisand clinical discrimination in a variety of neuroscience settings. In ideal abstractchaotic dynamical systems called Axiom A (Russians called them “C systems”),where most mathematical theorems are proven (Smale, 1967), all these measures,if properly computed, are equivalent. In real life, as in the related case of ergodicity,they are not, and since no single one is complete, the more (incomplete) measureswe use in our studies along with interest in the way that they differ, supplies moreuseful information about the system. Though researching and elucidating the mostreliable and valid ways of computing these measures are a valuable goal, thecurrent debates focused on the superiority of a single particular measure,constructed in a particular way in relationship to issues of insoluble absolutes like“randomness” versus “deterministic chaos may not be particularly valuable foruncovering new characteristics and potential mechanisms underlying a specific setof real neurobiological observables.Emphasizing diversity and relevance to the clinical biological sciences, wenote that quantifying patterns in ergodic (non-ergodic) measures have aided: thediscrimination between normal and abnormal opticokinetic nystagmus in neurologypatients (Aeson et al, 1997); localizing a two year old subcortical stroke in an EEGof a patient with no other signs or neurological findings (Molnar et al, 1997); thediagnosis of early (not late) multiple sclerosis, as a nonspecific long tract disorder,in patients with mild optical neuritis using cardiac rate dynamics (Ganz andFaustman, 1996); seizure prediction from minutes to hours before the event inwhich subthreshold, pre-phase transition spatial diffusion and oscillations incharacteristic changes in these measures can be found (Martinerie et al, 1998;Elger and Lehnertz, 1998; Pign et al, 1997; Iasemidis et al, 1990); using thesemeasures on the EEG to differentially predict hereditary predisposition to alcoholism202(Ehlers et al, 1995); indicating the presence or absence of septic encephalopathy(Straver et al, 1998); using time series from jejunal manometry to discriminateobjectifiable somatic from psychological conversion related irritable bowel syndrome(Wackerbauer et al, 1998); analyzing time-dependent patterns in plasma hormonelevels to discriminate between the presence or absence of a functioning tumor(Hartman et al, 1994, Mandell and Selz, 1997a); automated differentiation of ataxicfrom normal speech (Accardo and Menulo, 1998); and discrimination oftemporomandibular joint dysfunction from normal patterns of chewing motions(Morinushi et al, 1998).Styles of Orbital Motions in Chaotic Dynamical SystemsIn chaotic dynamics, in various specific ways, an initial hypothetical handfulof points lined up along the trajectory and acted on over time by the nonlineardifferential equation (“operator”), get out of order in an unpredictable way. Here thehypothetical handful can come from a statistical aggregate of initial conditions orfrom a single recursive orbit studied over long times. As noted above, ergodictheorists call this getting out of order “mixing” and how and to what degree thishappens consumes many mathematical theorems but for purposes of brainresearch, it can be best described using a variety of statistical measures. Forexample, visualizing the Lorenz attractor (see above) as a butterfly in phase space,the points get out of order because as they spiral out (“stretching”) to the edge ofone wing and return (“folding”) to the unstable fixed point on the butterfly’s bodywhence they either jump to some place on the other wing to spiral to its edge orreturn to the same wing to spiral out again. Which one of these is chosen isexquisitely sensitive to very small changes in where the trajectory started and verysmall fluctuations in where it returned to the unstable fixed point on the butterfly’sbody. In fact, specification of these locations is beyond the precision of any real,thermodynamically vulnerable system.Chaotic trajectories on the Rössler attractor (see above) wind out (“stretch”)to the edge along the inside of a conch shell in phase space and then are mapped203back (“fold”) into the spiral unpredictably somewhere in a mixing mechanism thathas been called “displaced reinjection.” In the slow-fast oscillations of the forced vander Pol in the chaotic regime, points in the slow phase (“repolarization”) jitter aroundand step on each other’s heels, getting out of order while waiting on the ledgebefore jumping (“depolarization”) to the next slow phase (“repolarization”) at someunpredictable time, thus generating a variably irregular series of interspike intervals.Stretching and folding are also responsible for getting points get out of orderin the single maximum map of the unit interval (studied for universal qualitative andquantitative properties by May and Feigenbaum and others as described above).With increases in parameter values, the parabolic hill function onto which the unitline has been stretched gets steeper, more stretched. Mapping points on the hillback onto the straight line of the unit interval results in what amounts to the linefolding back on itself. This stretching and folding eventually fills the line with points,but their sequence, from end to end, gets shuffled like a deck of cards.As described more generally above, points that start as neighbors may getseparated (“divergence along the attractor”) and those that start at a distance fromeach other may be thrown together (“compression back onto the attractor”). Theseexpanding and folding motions that characterize the chaotic behavior on strangeattractors have been likened to the actions of a taffy puller (Rössler, 1976). It is inthis way that nearby points can separate without leaving the attractor. It is also thecase that once indistinguishably close but then separated points may becompressed together again generating new, temporary (unstable) cycles of allpossible period lengths. These unstable fixed points may be the most importantfeature of chaotic systems from the standpoint of new ideas about brainmechanisms (Pei and Moss, 1996; So et al, 1997). This aggregation of unstableloops can occur from points fluctuating away and back to the attractor as well asduring the crowding of points at the turns after their stretching out on more linearparts of the flow. Under the mixing flow of a chaotic dynamics, it is also true that asingle point eventually explores the entire attractor, no attractor location isinaccessible to it.204Although counter-intuitive when expressed in words, the trajectories that onesees in the graphics of chaotic attractors result from the actions along the “unstable”directions of the stretching distortion; the actions in the otherwise invisible stabledirections “iron down” the points onto this unstable manifold (n dimensional abstractsurface).As might be expected from this set of characteristic motions, the diagnostictriad of chaotic dynamical systems are: (1) Sensitivity to initial conditions—tinydistances between starting points are magnified and large distances betweenstarting points are reduced under the stretching and folding actions of the system;(2) The presence of a theoretically infinite but countable number of unstableperiodic orbits of theoretically all period lengths—points in phase space can beviewed an attractive-repellers, visited and left by the orbits recursively as thedynamics proceed; and (3) Indecomposability—the attractor is not separable intoisolated regions and no points escape (see Devaney, 1989, for one of the clearestdefinitions). Of particular relevance to information encoding and transport by brainmechanisms, it is important to visualize that new information in the form of unstableperiodic orbits is being created as well as destroyed by the dynamics. Thelogarithmic rate of formation of these new orbits is computed as the system’stopological entropy (see below).Assuming the real neurobiological system under study is behaving in theseways (and often much has to be done to help justify such a claim), the observablestake the form of an irregular and/or episodic time series of amplitudes, as inrepeated sample, neuroendocrine studies of plasma hormone levels (Veldhuis andJohnson, 1992) or a sequence of times between events as in neuronal interspikeintervals (Katz, 1966; Perkel et al, 1967). These time or time-sequence series aregenerally studied from three relatively distinct yet complementary quantitativeperspectives: (1) As stochastic (“random”) processes with various amounts ofsequential dependency (autocorrelations) and scale (sample length) dependencies;(2) As “deterministic” smooth or discrete, vectorial geometries in phase spacefollowing reconstruction and/or embedding of the series as phase portraits or returnmaps; (3) As information generating and transporting, topological (about relative205nearness and sequential order not absolute distances), symbolic dynamicalprocesses which as either (1) or (2) can be analyzed with respect to its variousentropies, algorithmic complexities and word content and syntax. A variety oftechniques aimed at deciding between the relevance of one or another of theseunderlying assumptions (such as series and Fourier phase shuffling to destroystatistical autocorrelations and vectorial continuities but leaving the probabilitydensity distributions intact ) may at times help emphasize one or another of theseorientations in the analyses (see Ott et al, 1994 for a collection of articles on thistopic).Nonconvergent Distributions and Power Law Scaling in Biologically RelevantTime SeriesThe statistical distribution with which most of us are familiar is the Gaussianwhich can be generated by summing and averaging a series of independentrandom events. The average behavior head/tails probabilities observed by oneperson flipping a fair coin for a very long time or by many people flipping similarcoins for shorter times converges upon the invariant measure of 0.5. The variance,“second moment” in the distribution of a population of coin flipping sequences willbe finite and computable. In a graph of this distribution, the tails will converge to thex axis in a Gaussian exponential manner. The longer or the more numerous the“sample” series of observations, the closer they will approximate the “ergodic”invariant measures representing the true “central moments” of the behavior of this“population” of fair flipping coins. Since the coins are not changing their relevantcharacteristics over the time of observation, we say that the series is not timedependent but instead is “stationary.” Computation of correlations over increasinglags to determine how much and for how many flips the sequences continue toresemble themselves yield an exponential decay with a single characteristiccorrelation length. This reflects the existence of a finite variance from which itsamplitude is derived and serves as the single characteristic temporal scale of therandom process.206Before describing the relatively new set of measures of biological processesdesigned to find and quantitate what are assumed to be relatively sample sizeinsensitive, distributionally nonconvergent and multiply correlated processes thatare without a single time or space scale, we should remind ourselves that there isalready much more apparent “order” in a generically random situation than ourintuitions would lead us to believe. For example, if we keep cumulative scores in acompetition between heads and tails and determine the distribution of trials betweenthose in which the number of heads and tails are even, we will get periods betweenzero crossings of many lengths with very short ones and very (very) long onesbeing most statistically prominent. The distribution of these wavelengths is shapedlike a symmetrically fat-tailed, bowl (Feller, 1968). As another illustration, expectedruns of heads or tails in this Gaussian random task are longer and more frequentthan we might suspect. It has been proven that the expected run length grows withn coin flips (as an order of magnitude estimate) like the logarithm (for a fair coin,base 1/p = 1/0.5 = 2) of n. For example, in 512 ( e.g. 2 9 ) tosses, we cannot report arun of 9 heads as a evidence for a biased coin or the sign of some deterministiccoin tossing mechanism (Erdos and Renyi, 1970). If we had a 0.6 head biased coin,then the observation of a run of 13 heads couldn’t dissuade us from a randommechanism!Unlike our random coin task, the variances of many, perhaps most, timeseries of biologically-relevant events, do not tend to converge onto a limiting valueas sample size, n, grows, but rather continue to increase (or decrease) with n in ascale invariant manner. Instead of “regressing to the mean” with increasing samplelength or number, the likelihood of a larger deviation than previously observedincreases with n. Analyses of inter-event intervals reveals a multiplicity ofcharacteristic times. One interpretation of these finding might be that this representsevidence for the inherent “nonstationarity” of biological mechanisms as reflected in,for examples, the frequency of saccades concomitant with ceaselessly shifting fociof visual attention (Steriade and McCarley, 1990), or our inability to not think of“white bear” when so instructed (Wegner, 1994). Hermann Haken, the father oflaser-inspired “synergetics,” has said that biological mechanisms are not in a steady207state for very long, spontaneously and irregularly jumping from one unstabledynamical state to another (1997). This suggests that meaningful tension betweenexperimental sample lengths long enough to minimize statistical error and shortenough to be stationary may be, for the biological sciences, more apparent thanrelevant.The studies reviewed below exploit measures arising from the view that thenoisy statistics of nonstationarity in biological processes are not a sign ofmeasurement error, but rather evidence consonant with the statistical physics ofnonequilibrium states and phase transitions (Stanley, 1971; Stauffer, 1985;Yeomans, 1993). Very high amplitude fluctuations and multiple, up to infinite,correlation lengths are characteristic of the normal, on-going biological dynamicalbehaviors, which are apparently without characteristic amplitude and time scales.From this point of view, if most or all information is widely distributed in the brain(e.g., serial order of visual tasks involving motor cortical neurons, Carpenter et al,1999) ) then the “binding problem” (see above) could also be solved by multiple, upto infinite spatial and temporal correlation lengths in place of the current theories ofmonofrequency resonances (Singer, 1993). Hierarchical neurodynamicalmechanisms communicating across many mechanistic temporal and spatial scales,brain information transport analogous to the energy cascade of hydrodynamicturbulent velocities (Tennekes and Lumley, 1972), would be likely in the parametricvicinity of incipient bifurcations and phase transitions.Three closely related techniques for quantifying the systematic changes inaverage fluctuation amplitudes with n (scale, sample length) involve a “power law,”linear slope relationship between the logarithm of an index of variability and thelogarithm of sample segment sizes. These easy, yet powerful methods werebrought to experimentalists’ attention by Benoit Mandelbrot (Montroll and Badger,1974; Mandelbrot, 1983; Fedor, 1988; Bassingthwaighte et al, 1994; Liebovitch,1998). To estimate the exponent in Hurst rescaled range analysis, we compute thestandard deviation and the range of the deviation of the running sum from the meanon sequential subsamples of increasing size. The Hurst power law exponent is theslope of the straight line formed by graphing the logarithm of the subsample length208along the x axis and the logarithm of the ratio of the range to the standard deviationon the y axis. An independent random system has a Hurst of 0.5. If a sequentialincrease or decrease in an amplitude or inter-event time tends to be followed by achange in the same direction, the Hurst > 0.5. If an increase in the measure tendsto be followed by a decrease, then Hurst < 0.5. Computation of the Fano factor(power law exponent) exploits the same general strategy using the variance/meanin place of the range/variance and counting the number of events (such as singleneuron discharges or heartbeats) in time windows of increasing length, generating asimilar log-log graph. There is a relatively long history of the use of spike-numbervariance-to mean ratio in studies of response variability in visual cortical neurons(see Teich et al, 1996 for a review). The Allen factor (power law exponent) tends toreduce the influence of local trends by a computation of the variance of thedifference between the number of events in two successive time windows dividedby twice the mean number of events in the window.Each system’s invariant logarithmic slope across sample segment sizestakes the place of its missing finite variance in characterizing experimental data inwhich the distributional tails do not converge (or do so very slowly) to the x axis.Recent approaches to these measures in the context of stochastic analysis of DNAsequences, but also applied to normal and pathological cardiac inter-beat intervalsand gait interval sequences, have dealt with the influence of non-stationarity due toapparent trends in the data on α-equivalent indices by local mean-normalization ofthe fluctuations at each window size (Peng et al, 1993; Peng et al, 1995; Hausdorffet al, 1995).The rate of decay of the densities in the tails of the probability distribution asthey approach extreme values along the x axis, called the Levy exponent whenrepresented in Fourier space (technically, as a “characteristic function” of theprobability distribution) (Shlesinger, 1988; Shlesinger et al, 1995), can also becomputed directly on the distribution by fitting the tails with a two parameter curvequantifying their “fatness” and rates of decay (Mantegna, 1991). We can speak of aGaussian tail as having an exponential decay rate representable by α = 2 implying209finite variance. A tail with a nonconvergent decay rate of 1 < α < 2 indicates nonfinitevariance in the data such that the usual “normal curve” derived, standarddeviation dependent tests of statistical significance are without meaning. α < 1indicates the data is without a consequential mean and will require the use ofinterquartile measures to locate the center of the distribution (Adler et al, 1998).Recalling that the Hurst, Fano and Allan indices are invariant across samplesegment size, we remind ourselves that, as is the case in the finite mean andvariance, α = 2, Gaussian, any of the other “α tails” also retain their value (“shape”)across all partitions that might be used to sort and sum the observable. Thisproperty is called convolutional, α, stability. In passing it should be noted that thelast outpost of convergence of a probability density distribution with α = 2 is called“log-normal,” in which the tails along the x axis are “pulled in” by the variable beingplotted as its logarithm.A Hurst exponent of > 0.5 in the data is associated with a Levy exponent of <2.0, and both would be indicative of a process in which the characteristic style ofchange, rather than decay with some finite correlation length, would persist acrossall time. Using a bursting neuron as a generic example, a short interspike intervalwould, on the average, be followed by another short one and a long one by anotherlong one, and this behavior, unlike our fair coin flipping sequence of observables,would not become uncorrelated with itself even over infinite time. Another way torepresent this infinite, innumerably lengthed, correlation property is via its implicatefrequency (inverse wavelength) content by computing its best fit assortment (alongwith their densities) of a range of short to long sine waves forming the Fouriertransformation of the correlation function. The condition of correlated fluctuationsacross many measured temporal scales yields yet another power law slope whengraphed as the logarithm of its range of frequencies, f, plotted along the x axis,versus their corresponding amplitudes squared, powers, plotted along the y axis.Naming this spectral power law exponent β, the system’s characteristic scaling lawis usually expressed as 1 (Fedor, 1988; Hughes, 1995; Shlesinger, 1996;βf210Liebovitch, 1998).We see that the Hurst exponent, Fano and Allen factors, Levy exponent andpower spectral scaling exponent are kindred statistical descriptors. They are mostusefully applicable to systems with distributions that fail to be Gaussian orasymmetrically Poisson, the latter from random data sequences with only positive xvalues, thus backed up toward zero by a minimum inter-event interval or amplitude.These time series are sequentially dependent, not conventionally stationary, withoutfinite central moments and with self-correlations that don’t demonstrate Gaussianexponential decay with sample length or time. The following are some examples ofthe use of these measures in studies of biological dynamics. .Examples of Biological Data with Divergent Distributions and Power LawScalingA paradigm challenging group of experiments involved models and measuresof the distribution of characteristic open and closed times of membrane ionconductance channels. The usual approach to this problem assumed the existenceof a small set of distinguishable channel types that were reflected in discreteconductance events with a small set of characteristic open and closed times. Thedistributions of each of could be fitted with its own, Markov process derived,exponential. With technical advances and improved temporal resolution, morecharacteristic times and their associated α = 2 exponentials were reported with asmany as three not being unusual. Liebovitch (and Sullivan,1987; 1989) usedanalogue to digital transformation of current recordings from the unselective cornealepithelial channels and voltage dependent potassium channels in cultured mousehippocampal cells at temporal resolutions ranging from 170 to 5000 Hz and foundsimilarly shaped, α < 2, nonconvergent distributions across temporal scales. Thisled these investigators to suggest that, related to the >16 recorded magnitudes ofcharacteristic times, from picoseconds to months, in autonomous protein motion(Careri et al, 1975; Gurd and Rothgeb, 1979), that there was an “α stable” hierarchy211of lifetimes of states, observable at almost any temporal resolution that methodswould allow.Early and representative studies comparing the fit of the data withhierarchical scaling functions versus a sum of a small number of Markovianexponentials included studies of a calcium activated potassium channel in humanfibroblasts (Stockbridge and French, 1989) which yielded evidence to support bothmodels, as did studies of membrane conductances in corneal epithelial cells byanother group (Korn and Horn, 1988). In a systematic comparison of scaling andMarkov exponential modes of the gating kinetics of GABA activated chloridechannels, acetylcholine activated end plate potentials, calcium activated potassiumchannels and fast chloride channels (McManus et al, 1988), it was found that thelatter fit the data best in most experiments. Similar results were reported in studiesof the glutamate and delayed rectifier potassium channel with respect todistributions of open and closed times (Sansom et al, 1989). Space does not permita systematic account of the continuing debate and conflicting studies about theserepresentations and the implicit biophysics of discrete, finite versus continuous,hierarchical channel event heterogeneity. It is interesting that recent experimentsmaking use of Hurst rescaled range analyses of time series of whole cell membranevoltage fluctuations (without the assumptions and current renormalizing proceduresassociated with patch clamping) have yielded additional evidence for multiplycorrelated, Hurst > 0.5, α < 2 power law behavior of what some might regard moregenerally as a protein relaxation time mediated hierarchical array of ionconductance behaviors (Liebovitch and Todorov, 1996).Following the discovery of (very) subsaturating (“far from equilibrium”) ratbrain levels of the common cofactor for tyrosine and tryptophan hydroxylases,tetrahydrobiopterin (Bullard et al, 1978), studies of amino acid substrate saturationfunctions and time courses determined at these low, physiological co-reactantconcentrations manifested patterns of hierarchical multiplicity and discontinuitiessuggestive of bifurcations and time-dependent fluctuations with fractional(hierarchical) time scaling exponents that were sensitive to psychotropic drugs212(Mandell and Russo, 1981; Knapp and Mandell, 1983; Russo and Mandell, 1984a;Russo and Mandell, 1986). Similar bifurcating and power law kinetics were found inreceptor-ligand binding systems (Mandell, 1984) which were confirmed by morerecent studies of diffusion-limited binding kinetics with receptors immobilized on abiosensor surface (Sadana, 1998). Hierarchical kinetics have also been reported intime courses of drug and metabolite levels (Koch and Zajcek, 1991), tissue tracerwashout studies (Beard and Bassingthwaighte, 1998), carrier mediated transportprocesses (Ogihara et al, 1998), general pharmacokinetic functions (Macheras et al,1996) and biochemical networks (Yates, 1992). It is likely that bifurcating andhierarchical, power law kinetic functions will be studied more commonly in thechemical literature in general (Shlesinger and Zaslavsky, 1996; Berlin et al, 1996)as well as applied to a variety of protein-mediated biological functions (Dewey,1997).The first demonstration of and stochastic model for nonconvergentdistributions of interspike intervals of a single neuron was by Gerstein andMandelbrot (1964). Though rich with possibilities, it has been only very recently thatadditional work from this point of view has been published. This is likely due to thefact that most neuroscience oriented statistical packages, with rare exceptions, arewithout techniques for computing descriptive parameters for these divergentprobability density distributions. This has not been the case for economic timeseries, download STABLE from http:///www.cas.american.edu/~jpnolan. Recently,applications of the Fano and Allan factor as well as power spectral scalingexponents to observed and shuffled series of spike counts and interspike intervalsin the auditory and visual systems (including spatial and/or time resolved single unitrecordings in retinal ganglion, lateral geniculate and lateral superior olivary cells aswell a auditory nerve fibers) demonstrate the characteristic behavior ofnonconvergent, hierarchical stochastic systems (Teich, 1989; Teich et al, 1990;Lowen and Teich, 1992; Kumar and Johnson, 1993; Kelly et al, 1996; Teich et al,1997). These statistical techniques are well suited to the characterization of theirregularly intermittent bursting patterns generic for activity in single neurons as well213as in nonlinear equations representing them and other brain processes (Mandell,1983).An early study of power spectral scaling in the EEG reported alpha bandfluctuations that extended a 1 , β ≈ 1 pattern to 0.02 Hz (Musha, 1981), as didβfother applications of the log-log power spectrum to the EEG in man (Hu and Hu,1988; Prichard, 1992). This power law scaling led naturally to the suggestion thatthe range of frequencies available in the electromagnetic signal from the calivarialsurface extends far beyond those currently appreciated and may be available forstudy using relatively noise free recording techniques such as themagnetoelectroencephalogram (Mandell and Selz, 1991). A not surprising range ofintrinsic correlation lengths reflected in Hurst > 0.5 and/or Levy exponents < 2 havebeen reported in lamb fetal breathing patterns (Szeto et al, 1992). The exponenthas been shown to be sensitive to maternal alcohol intake in humans (Akay andMulder, 1998), rat neonatal motoric activity (Selz et al, 1995), and nuchal atoniaduration sequences (associated with putative intra-uterine REM sleep) in fetalsheep (Anderson et al, 1998).Sequential amplitudes in 1 Hz stimulated soleus spinal cord H-reflexdemonstrated a 1 , β ≈ 0.83 in control subjects and, reflecting the decrement inβfcorrelations, by 0.31 in patients with losses in supraspinal input from spinal cordinjury (Nozaki et al, 1996). Whereas the sequences of fixation times in eyemovements of normal control subjects reading difficult material demonstrated anexponentially decaying distribution, those of schizophrenic patients demonstrated apower law tail, consistent with more sequential correlations (Yokoyama et al, 1996).This finding may be related to the appearance of velocity arrests, runs of sticky fixedpoints, in a spatially oscillating target task, called “smooth pursuit eye movementdysfunction” in schizophrenic patients which has been modeled as a parametricdisorder in a periodically driven nonlinear dynamical system (Huberman, 1987). The“short time fractal dimension” has been used to discriminate acoustic signaltransformations from the speech of normal subjects and ataxic patients (Accardo214and Mumolo, 1998). Spontaneous changes in the apparent syllabic sound made byregularly presented, word-like auditory stimuli emerge irregularly, the duration ofperceived sameness demonstrating a power law distribution of “dwell” times (Tulleret al, 1998). The same kind of power law distribution of characteristic “brain times”can be found in studies of gait cycle durations in normal walking (Hausdorff et al,1996) with a decrease in this locally detrended, α-like index compared with controls(0.91±0.05) in patients with the basal ganglia disorders of Parkinson’s (0.82±0.06)and Huntington’s (0.60±0.04) Diseases (Hausdorff et al, 1998). Hurst > 0.5 hasbeen speculated to more accurately quantitate the fundamental time structure ofcells that was previously called circahoralian (ultradian) intracellular rhythms(Brodski, 1998).Reconstructions of Time Series as Orbital GeometriesRene Thom (1972), extending the ideas of Poincaré and D’Arcy Thompson(1942), argued that experimentally useful, intuitive connections between thequalities of biological processes and the quantities of an explicit (equations known)or implicit (equations unknown) dynamical system could be best achieved throughthe use of graphic representations of their geometric and topological forms. Notablysuccessful examples can be found in the work of Thom, Arnold (1984) and Zeeman(1977), who were inspired by “caustics” (the shapes made on surfaces by thecoincidence of reflected or refracted light rays) and Whitney’s representation ofparametric manifolds (surfaces) by the shadows they would make on a plane whenback lit (Whitney, 1955). This led to a small number of qualitatively predictive,number-of-independent-parameters dependent shapes, such as “folds” “cusps” and“wavefronts.” Experimentally crossing the values of these independent variableforms at their singular boundaries successfully predicted discontinuities in theotherwise smooth alterations in the dependent variable; i.e. bifurcations(“catastrophes”) in the behavior of the observable. This approach was best suited tothe study of systems with many independent variables and one dependent variablethat could be mapped on the axis of the latter to represent a continuum of215operationally defined “energy states.” Smooth changes along the path of thenonlinear parameter manifold generated discontinuous changes in energy levelsindicating states of the observable. Crossing a wrinkle in an “independent variable”(some call it “order parameter” to indicate its emergence rather than availability forpredictable manipulation) such as the nonlinear parameter surface of thecountervailing influences of survival fear and financial cost, may lead to a bifurcationin behavior from peace (“low energy”) to war (“high energy”) (Zeeman, 1977).In a similar geometric spirit but dealing with nonequilibrium systems inmotion, the conditions such that one could “smoothly” embed a trajectory like acontinuously recorded EEG record, a complicatedly coiled snake into a three orhigher dimensional box without loss of its essential dynamical or statisticallymeasureable properties, was settled by Whitney in what is now referred to as the“embedding theorem” (Whitney, 1936). Starting with a tangled knot of overlappingvectorial orbits with apparent “non-invertable points” (given a point, one cannotchose among or between the more than one point that it apparently came from), itcan always be unwrapped into a non-crossing trajectory satisfying uniqueness whenreconstructed in a box of a little more than twice the parameter-determineddimension of the original space of observables.A common technique for the spatial reconstruction of the output of adynamical system is called a “time delay embedding.” This approach, firstsuggested by Ruelle (1987, pg. 28) replaced the value, x, versus the timederivative, dx , phase portrait plot described for a continuously perturbed bob on adtspring above. A sequence of observables over time, in, for example, threedimensional “phase space” (Packard et al, 1980; Takens, 1981; Sauer et al, 1991),is depicted by a curve representing the system’s trajectory at times t 1 , t 2 , t 3 , bysliding one-by-one down the series and plotting each p 1 , p 2 , p 3 , location withrespect to each other along the x, y and z axes respectively. The choice of timeinterval between the points, the delay, can be delicate and usually some standardfraction of the decay time of the sequence’s autocorrelation length, “the decay timeof mutual information” is chosen. There are many technical considerations,216including those involving the choice of the embedding space vis a vis the “true”dimension of the attractor. This becomes an issue when, for example, the attractorshrinks over time to some subspace of the initial embedding (Liebert et al, 1991 andreferences therein).If we imagine the process of time series reconstruction to inscribe anattractor’s untidy ball-of-string of recurrent trajectories in three dimensions, we canthen, by making the z-dimension a constant value, cut the ball with a twodimensional plane, a “Poincaré surface of section.” This could yield a roundishcloud of discrete points on the x,y plane and t n-1 – t n would be the time between twopiercings of this surface. It has been proven that almost any cut, as long as it ismade transverse to the direction of the orbital trajectories, is equally valid and usefulfor further analyses (Oseledec, 1968). If the original embedding and subsequencesection was in high enough dimension to allow invertability, we might have enough(trial and error) knowledge to be able to write a discrete equation, a “return map,” f,fthat would move one point to the next on the plane as (x,y) t ←→ ⎯ (x,y) .What can sometimes be case with real systems (Coffman et al, 1986), is thatreducing the geometric reconstruction still one dimension further, accepting noninvertability,ironing down the points in the plane onto the x axis line (normalized to[0,1]), and plotting the values at x t against x t+1 (“mapping the unit interval to itself”),can generate points in the general shape of a parabola with dynamics representableby the same family of one parameter, single maximum discrete equations thatgenerated May's sequence of bifurcations, Feigenbaum’s scaling and Metropolis,Stein and Stein’s (and Sharkovskii’s) U sequence (see discussions of qualitativeand quantitative universalities above).Although sometimes a significant change in brain system physiology, such aspenicillin-induced epileptic neuron spiking activity is revealed simply by a change inthe graphic appearance of suitably embedded time series data (Zimmerman andRapp, 1991), more often statistical measures made on the geometric dynamics ofthe points on the attractor are required.n−1t n217Orbital Divergence Characterizes Expansive Dynamics on BiologicalAttractorsIn the dynamical world of equilibria (fixed points in phase space) andperiodic cycles (fixed points of a return map), a common concern involves theirstability. What happens if an adventitious jiggle moves the orbit a little distanceaway from the fixed point? Would the wind wiggled suspension bridge start to flapwith increasing amplitude or would it damp back down quickly to its stable state. A“Lyapounov functional,” L, is constructed which can be visualized like a smoothpotential bowl around the fixed point such that any L stable solution that starts at itsbottom tends to stay there or is asymptotically L stable if the solution converges tothe fixed point at the bowl’s bottom as t → ∞ . If the point is not L stable, it is Lunstable.The modern study of nonlinear systems have produced another kind ofstability issue with a similar appellation yielding other direction specific indices, theLyapounov characteristic exponents, λ (Oseledec, 1968; Eckmann andRuelle,1985; Ruelle, 1990; Ott et al, 1994). In this context, the instability is not oneof perturbative escape from a fixed point, but of the average rate with which the(theoretically infinitesimal) distances among a handful of points representing a set ofinitial conditions (each a precision limited, hypothetical repetition of the sameexperiment), are being stretched apart by the expansive action of a strange attractorsystem. In three dimensions, one can envision a ball of initial conditions beingelongated along the unstable direction and ironed down from both sides along thestable direction over time, transforming the ball into an ellipsoid and then into a(recurrent) curve. In simplest terms and thinking about a one dimensional scalartime series, the Lyapounov exponent reflects the multiplicative average (logarithmicaddition) of the sequence of slopes of the series of straight lines connecting thepoints. An average slope of > 45 ° is expansive such that a linear distance on the x-axis is increased when mapped onto the y axis. A slope of < 45 ° is a contractionmapping reducing the linear distance of the x-axis when mapped to the y axis.218Rössler’s generic chaotic system (see above) moving recurrently in a threedimensional box can be orthogonally decomposed into three directional motions in amoving frame, each with a signatory sign of λ . The unstable direction of expansivestretching is characterized by some number > 0, λ( + ), the stable direction ofcontractive folding, some number, < 0, λ( − ), and the neutrally stable direction ofrecurrence, λ( 0 ). For The “Lyapounov spectrum” of the Rössler attractor is[ λ( + ), λ( −), λ( 0 )] (Shaw, 1981). An n-dimensional dynamical systems has n onedimensionalLyapounov exponents, and it is sometimes the case in relatively noisefree, finite semi-stationary data lengths of the neurosciences, that a λ > 0 can beshown to exist for a second one, in a dynamical situation called “hyperchaos” by(Rossler, 1979). For example, two and sometimes three λ( + ) have been reported inthe flows on the EEG attractor of normal alert subjects (Gallez and Babloyantz,1991). The presence of measurement noise, the finiteness of neurophysiologicalsample lengths as well as the relatively small expansive actions in some directionsin the chaotic attractors of brain dynamics lead to the finding that most often, onlyone “leading Lyapounov exponent,” λ( + ), is reliably computable (Sano andSawada, 1885; Wolf et al, 1985; Eckmann et al, 1986).A counter-intuitive fact about the stability of a dynamical system when adecrease in the value of λ( + ) is observed such that λ( + ) → λ( 0 ), is that this moreneutral stability augers a global bifurcation (Guckenheimer and Holmes, 1983). Asmall perturbation does not change the global dynamics of an already expandingand contracting (called “hyperbolic”) dynamical system, it will maintain the style ofits motions. However, when λ( + ) → λ( 0 ), a velocity changing perturbation evokes abifurcation to a new dynamic in what is called “loss of hyperbolic stability.” The bestexamples come from the observations of this kind of change in the EEG predictingthe onset of epileptic seizures in patients with focal or temporal lobe epilepsy(Iasemidis et al, 1988,1990; Iasemidis and Sackellares, 1996 ).219The number and variety of algorithmic strategies for computing Lyapounovexponents that are applicable to real data divide naturally into those that computedirectly the average rate of separation of neighboring points from the “fiduciary”orbit, as observed on the reconstructed attractor, from which only the largest λ canbe obtained (Wolf et al, 1985), and a variety of techniques based on assumedmodel maps of the unknown flow along which the sequential products of the localderivatives are computed. The logarithms of the straight line slopes of the sequenceof directionally decomposed local tangent vectors multiplied, yield as manyLyapounov exponents as directions (Sano and Sawaka, 1985; Eckmann et al, 1986;Geist et al, 1990). The techniques of regularization by which these model processesapproximate the unknown flow include those with least squares, linear fitassumptions (Eckmann et al, 1986; Sato et al, 1987; Buzug et al, 1990), moredetailed fits involving polynomial expressions in higher powers (Briggs, 1990; Brownet al, 1991; Bryant et al, 1991) and techniques such as “singular valuedecomposition” which decomposes the flow into orthogonal components beforecomputing the logarithmic rate of divergence of nearby points on each of them(Stoop and Parisi, 1991). A clever check on the Lyapounov number obtained is tostudy the flow backwards so that, for example, some rate of separation of points inthe forward direction would approximate the rate of convergence in the timereversed data (Parlitz, 1992).Among the sources of spurious Lyapounov exponents are sample lengthsthat are too short and/or too measurement-noisy to compute a statistically stableaverage, embedding dimensions that are too high or low and attractors (many ofphysiological relevance) that have geometric features such as sharp corners or tightfolds as in the Rössler (where points gather) or delicate boundary points such asthose on the body on the Lorenz butterfly (see above) where very small distancesdetermine whether the orbit makes big jumps to the right or left wing leading touncharacteristically large separations. This “nonuniformity” in the rates of expansionand contraction in the dynamics over the attractor, a source of error in computationsof statistical indices of the average behavior, becomes a useful tool incharacterizing individual differences in sets of neurobiological data ranging from220brain enzyme kinetics (Mandell, 1984) and single neuron firing patterns (Selz andMandell, 1991) to human psychomotor and cognitive behavior (Selz, 1992; Selz andMandell, 1993).The Leading λ( + ) of Some Biologically Relevant Time SeriesAn early application of a simplified form of leading Lyapounov exponent tobrain data involved the computation of the one dimensional averaged slope of invitro studies of psychopharmacological drug and peptide effects on time series ofcatecholamine and indoleamine biosynthetic enzyme activities studied atphysiological, far-from-equilibrium reactant concentrations (Russo and Mandell,1984b; Knapp and Mandell, 1984). A contemporaneous study also suggested theinfluence of differences in initial conditions for pharmacokinetic equilibrium times indrug binding kinetics by proteins (Bayne and Hwang, 1985).The most extensive applications to the clincial neurosciences of theLyapounov measure of the exponential divergence of orbital points has involvedreconstructed brain wave attractors from the intracranial or scalp recordings of theEEG (Duke and Pritchard, 1991; Dvorak and Holden, 1991; Jansen and Brandt,1993). Space prevents us from surveying more than a small representative set ofthe studies (Jansen, 1996). It should be noted, however, that this is an area inwhich “state of the art” research has grown quite complicated and somewhatcontroversial with respect to technical issues. The choices of the digitizingfrequency of the smooth record, the dimension of the embedding space and timedelays continue to be debated in the context of numerical computations of λ anddimension measures (Mayer-Kress, 1986; Ott et al, 1994).Controls for the implicitly required statistical discrimination between“randomness” and “deterministic chaos” consist of sequence and (Fourier) phaserandomization generating “surrogate data” which conserve the probabilitydistributions and destroy the correlation properties and attractor geometries (Saueret al, 1991; Ott et al, 1994). Since neither bring with them any connections with221known or explorable brain mechanisms, one might argue that at this early stage ofthe work it would be more desirable to simply report the quantitative findings,leaving unanswerable questions about ultimate causality for later discussion (seebelow).The first EEG λ( + ) was reported in a patient with epilepsy (Babloyantz andDestexhe, 1986) which was confirmed by others (Iasemedia et al, 1988; Frank etall, 1990). An important study of simultaneous time series from 16 subduralelectrodes placed in the right temporal cortex of a patient with a right medialtemporal lobe epileptogenic focus demonstrated that a decrease in a single lead’sλ( + ) reliably anteceded and localized the first signs of the incipient seizure. Therest of the leads followed with similarly decreased positivity in their leadingLyapounov exponents associated with spatially coherent patterns of behavior. Inaddition, the averaged value of the leading Lyapounov exponents in the 16 leadsincreased post-ictally over the averaged values of λ( + ) in the pre-ictal state(Iasemidis et al, 1988,1990). These findings, including seizure anticipation for 25minutes, were confirmed using intracranial recordings in 16 patients with temporallobe epilepsy (Elger and Lehnertz, 1998). The para-ictal decrease and post-ictalincrease in λ( + ) found in patients with focal temporal lobe seizures was confirmedmore generally in left and right pre-frontal-to-mastoid EEG recordings made before,during and after electroconvulsive shock treatment of psychiatric patients (Krystaland Weiner, 1991). Pre-ictal changes were also found six minutes before seizureonset from scalp EEG recordings in 17/19 patients with chronic focal epilepsy(Martinerie et al, 1998). The most exciting potential application of this approach isits use, in real time, for the prediction and prophylactic treatment of incipientseizures, minutes to hours before the event, in place of or augmenting long termdrug management (Iasemidis and Sackellares, 1996).There is a growing literature about leading Lyapounov exponent(s) in thereconstructed attractor of the EEG associated with a variety of normal andpathological human behavioral states. For examples, two and sometimes three222λ( + ) were reported in awake relaxed subjects and were lost in deep sleep (StageIV) and coma (advanced Jakob-Creutzfeld disease), suggesting that level ofconsciousness correlated positively with amount of orbital divergence (Gallez andBablioyantz, 1991). A “pathologically low” leading λ( + ) was also found to becharacteristic of the EEG of patients with Alzheimer’s syndromes (Jeong et al,1998). Technically defined sleep stages (I, II, III, IV, REM) were found to correlatewell with the values of the leading λ( + ) of the EEG in normal subjects (Fell et al,1993; 1996; Pradhan and Sadasivan, 1996). EEG recordings during problemsolving sometimes, but not always, demonstrated a relationship between values ofλ( + ) and the kind or amount of load of the task (Micheloyannis et al, 1998;Popivanovov et al, 1998; Meyer-Lindenberg et al, 1998). Both emotionally positiveand negative videos increased the value of the leading λ( + )(Aftanos et al, 1997) asdid computer generated music with sounds that exploited a “pleasing” hierarchical,1/f but not an “unpleasant” 1/f 2 frequency spectrum (see previous section aboutpower law scaling) (Jeong et al, 1998). The EEG theta rhythm of “day dreaming”manifested a lower λ( + ) than the “relaxed alert awake” alpha rhythm (Roschke et al,1997). Relationships between the Lyapounov spectra demonstrated both regionalindependence and task-related dependence in the magnetoencephalography recordin man (Kowalik and Elbert, 1995).These and other studies suggest that divergence rate of orbits on ageometrically reconstructed attractor is a subtle measure, which can be quantifiedas a continuous variable and which has been found to be useful in a variety ofneuroscience-related, experimental contexts. The range includes thecharacterization of the discharge pattern of a single somatic or renal sympatheticnerve fiber (Gong et al, 1998;Zhang and Johns, 1998); quantifying the results ofperturbing autonomic nervous system activity, for examples, exercise, atropine andpropranolol decrease λ( + ) in the cardiac interbeat interval attractor (Hagerman etal, 1996) and interference with the function of the baroreflex or clonidine alters theλ( + ) in the blood pressure attractor in man and animals (Wagner et al, 1996;223Mestivier et al, 1998); and predicting defects in visual learning functions fromdecreases in the λ( + ) of the cardiac interbeat interval attractor in patients withmultiple sclerosis (Ganz and Faustman, 1996).We recall that on theoretical grounds (Guckenheimer and Holmes, 1983), adecrease in the positivity of λ( + ) → λ( 0)in a delay coordinate, geometricreconstruction of a time series of observables may auger an incipient globalbifurcation in the system’s dynamics. As reviewed above, this has turned out to bethe case in several studies of the EEG and electrocorticogram in epileptic patients.Futher research will be required to see if this idea has substance more generally forpredicting “catastrophic” changes in other brain-related systems.Power Law Scaling of Orbital Geometries in Time Series ReconstructionsBenoit Mandelbrot’s book in its first incarnation was derived from his lecturesat College de France in 1973 and 1974 and was called Les Objets Fractals: Forme,Hasard et Dimension (Mandelbrot, 1975). This essay was translated into English asFractals, Form Chance and Dimension (Mandelbrot, 1977). Later expanded andreworked editions displayed another title, The Fractal Geometry of Nature(Mandelbrot, 1982) but the deep conceptual, sometimes poetic fusion and confusiongenerated by the apparent identity among the objects of his first title remains.“Fractal,” along with “chaos” and “strange attractor” are among the most widelyfamiliar new words in modern dynamical systems research. Fractal is the mostdifficult to rigorously define and is commonly misunderstood due to the evocativeyet dream-like cognitive condensations provoked by the first title and its reflectionsin Mandelbrot’s prose. A common conceptual confusion is exemplified by theassumed relation between “fractal time event distributions” of the cardiac interbeatinterval and the “fractal like” anatomy of the purkinje network of the cardiacconduction system. Data from both contexts are often shown juxtaposed in thesame illustration as though their relationships were obvious (Goldberger et al, 1990;Goldberger, 1996; Liebovitch and Todorov, 1996). “Fractal times” and “fractal224geometries” are not related to each other essentially, either in the mathematical orphysiological domain, but are often made vaguely equivalent on the basis of theirlexical similarity.An experimentally meaningful relationship between fractal statistics (hazard),dynamical fractals (dimension) and fractal geometries (form), has to be proven on acase by case basis and not assumed from their common designation. Among theinformal attempts to do this have been those that involve the branching pattern ofnerves and the associated reductions in their diameter-dependent characteristicconduction velocities yielding a multiplicity of “arrival times.” There is, however, amore central idea common to these concatenated meanings of fractal: thestatistical, dynamical and geometric expressions of “scaling,” a word which is notmentioned in Mandelbrot’s book titles. The cluster of theories, theorems andmethods associated with the idea of scaling (and renormalization) have led to NobelPrizes for Flory (1971), Wilson (1975) and de Gennes (1979) and the (equivalentmathematical) Field’s Medal for McMullen (1994). There is speculation that the lasttwo awards were supported by the inspiration and interest given their research byMandelbrot’s intuitions and books.Scaling laws take the place of (unknown causal) physical laws by indicatingthe proportion by which observables of a system can be changed in relationship toeach other such that some statement about them, “this varies with that,” still holds.In a cross species comparison, as the average weight of a mammalian body, calledlb, increases, the skeletal weight, called w, increases at an exponentially greaterrate: w goes like lb 1.08 where lb 1.0 would indicate that they grew across species atthe same rate. Plotting log (lb) on the x axis and log (w) on the y axis in a log-logplot results in a straignt line with a slope that indicates the power law scalingrelationship between body weight and skeletal weight across mammals. The slopeof the scaling exponent of 1.08 is a little over 45 ° = 1. In contrast, the metabolic rate,r, goes like (lb) 0.75 , r ≈ (lb) 0.75 . Larger animals (relative to their weight) have lowerbasal metabolic rates (Schmidt-Nielsen, 1984). We don’t completely know the chainof intervening mechanisms that relate these variables to each other but we do know225invariant scaling laws that describe their relationships within some limits on therange of values.In describing the functional size, radius of gyration, R g , of a polymer such asa polypeptide, composed of N monomers, assume each of the amino acids to bethe same and that they are in a “good” hydrophobic solvent that didn’t stick thepolymer together in a fold. Flory (1971) found a scaling law for certain broad classesof polymers and solvents, R g ≈ αN ν , where the exponent, ν = 3/5, was universal, Nindicated the number of monomers in the chain and the value of “pre-factor” αdepended upon the particular monomer and solvent chosen. Log R g plotted againstlog N has a “power law” slope of 0.60. For an equally static but less physicalexample, there is the well known Zipf law of “vocabulary balance”(Zipf, 1949). Firstreported for the 260,450 words of James Joyce’s Ulysses, the slope of the log of therank of the words found (ordered from most to least along x) plotted against the logof their frequency (along y) results in a power law that is (generally) true for othercollections of words and in other languages.An accessible example of a dynamical scaling law arises in a twodimensional lattice model of a forest which is to be set on fire with probability pindependent random single tree ignitions. At some critical p, p c , the fire sweepsthrough the entire forest (“percolates”) and the correlation length of the connectedclusters grows as |p-p c | -γ with a universal scaling exponent, γ = 4/3, for all MonteCarlo, two dimensional percolation problems (Stauffer, 1985; Grimmett, 1989).Mandelbrot’s scheme for the power laws that compose his fractal geometryof dynamical objects is a measure made on the pattern of occupancy in theembedding space by the reconstructed orbits of an attractor. It is, generally,mass ≈ length D 0in which D (the subscript that of the “capacity dimension”) is not the0whole number of Euclidian dimensions, d, of the space in which the orbits areembedded. After Hausdorff’s “convergence of external and internal measures”(Hurewicz and Wallman, 1948), the (capacity) fractal dimension D is also definedas being larger than its topological dimension and smaller than its Euclidianembedding dimension. Graphing a time series on a plane one can think of its0226topological dimension as that of a line equal to one. If each time step had thelargest up or down amplitude as possible, its fractal dimension would approach (butnot reach) that of the embedding plane, Euclidean d = 2.The D 0 of the one dimensional Richardson technique (Mandelbrot, 1967) canbe computed by covering the one dimensional surface of a time series with anumber, #, of line segments of several orders of magnitude range of lengths, l.Graphing log(l) along the x-axis and log #(l) along the y-axis yields a negative linearslope, -s. As defined, 1- s = D 0 noting that (-(-s)→+s) such that 1 < D 0 = 1+s < 2.Strain differences and peptide and psychotropic drug-induced changes in D 0computed in this way were found in time series of fluctuations in rat brainstemtyrosine and tryptophan hydroxylase activities under far-from-equilibrium coreactantconcentrations (Mandell and Russo, 1981; Knapp et al, 1981; Knapp andMandell, 1983; 1984). Systematic influences of stimulant drug dose on D 0 werefound as well in these systems (Mandell et al, 1982). This simple measure, madedirectly on the “roughness” of the graph of a one dimensional time series rather thanon its orbital reconstruction, has been used to discriminate the pattern offluctuations in daily mood scales in normal subjects and mood disordered patients(Woyshville et al, 1999). These findings confirmed dimensional scaling exponentson higher dimensional embeddings of similar time series in mood disorderedpatients (Gottschalk et al, 1995; Pezard et al, 1996). Due to the ease and rapidity ofits computation, techniques involving D 0 on one dimensional time series arecurrently in development as possible real time epilepsy predictors when analyzingthe output of a large number of EEG leads simultaneously.If M(ε) is the minimum number of d-dimensional cubes of side ε required tocover the d-dimensionally embedded attractor, plotting a logarithmic range of rulersof length ε (as ε→0) along the x axis and a logarithmic range of number of cubes,M(ε), each of corresponding ε-edge size, along the y axis, results in a negative(more smaller M(ε) ‘s and fewer bigger M(ε) ‘s) power law slope D 0 . Here thenumbered covering cubes, M(ε), are those in which the probability of containing atleast one point (its “probability density measure,” often called µ) is not zero. We227note that changing the ratios of the numbers of cubes that are dense in pointprobability to those that are sparse would not influence the value of D 0 . This helpsdifferentiate D 0 from other dimensions and, as noted above, D 0 as a maximalestimate of the fractal dimension, is called the capacity dimension and byconvention the scaling law is writtenM( ε)D≈ ε− 0. More specifically, D0 is calculatedby repeatedly dividing the d-dimensionally embedded phase space into equal d-dimensional hypercubes and plotting the log of the fraction of the hypercubescontaining data points versus the log of the (normalized) linear dimension (“lengthscale”) of the hypercubes. The slope fitted to the most linear part of the slope(usually the middle 50%) indicates the capacity dimension. D 0 is computed forincreasing embedding (and cube) dimension, d, until it achieves an asymptoticplateau, it “saturates”. This is but one of a range of geometric scaling exponents,“dimensions,” that are currently being computed (Farmer et al, 1983; Grassbergerand Procaccia, 1983; Meyer-Kress, 1986; Theiler, J. (1990); Gershenfeld, 1992; Ottet al,, 1994).Although still subject to debate, convention has it that the sample lengthrequired to determine this most primitive of dimension computations goes likeD10 0(e.g. a dimension of 2.45 requires a sample length of at least 282 points).Assuming robust findings using D0 as indicated by non-parametric tests ofsignificance in test-retest, before and after, drug treatment designs, this arbitrarycriteria sounds more like ritual than meaningful help for the clinical neuroscientistwith (say) 100 spinal fluid hormone and metabolite samples painfully andlaboriously collected from a patient’s indwelling catheter over 48 hours. In thecontext of real data (and not numerical studies of differential equations), we aredealing with empirical findings that must find their meaning (or lack of) in the contextof questions about issues in the neurosciences, not in abstract questions such asthose about the number of dimensions that an unknown differential equation wouldrequire to represent the data (Broomhead and King, 1986). In a similar arbitraryspirit, a system manifesting a D 0 > 5 is considered not discriminable from a randomprocess; e.g. the difference between D 0 = 5 versus D 0 = 7 (though perhapsstatistically significant) is thought to be without meaning. Since in neurobiological228research, “random” (if it doesn’t mean measurement error) indicates unknowndegrees of freedom, this D 0 > 5 rule is also without relevance for brain research.D 1 is called the “information dimension” and is computed by counting thenumber of ε-cubes, M(ε), it takes to cover the points constituting some fixed fractionof all of the points of the set of orbital points on the attractor and can be regarded asthe “core dimension” (without the outliers) of the set. The counterintuitive finding isthat D 1 is nearly constant across a range of fixed fractions that are less than thewhole measure (Farmer et al, 1983). The invariance of D 1 can even be taken to theextreme by computing the DMlim ln ( ε )ε ln( ε)1=→oaround (typical, not all) single points. Inthis context, D 1 is called the “pointwise dimension” or “singularity exponent” and, asmight be anticipated, its value is usually less than that of D 0 .The scaling exponent that is both sensitive to point densities and easiest tocompute from real data is the “correlation dimension,” D 2. Here, analogous to therelationship between the amplitudes of the variance and the correlation function inconventional statistics, the measure squared is of interest for the computation of D 2 ,e.g.M ( ε )2I( 2, ε ) = ∑[ µ ( Ci)] (see below for this use of measure µ on sum Σ of cubes Ci).i=1The selection of D 2 as the fractal measure dominates the studies that invoke scalingexponents to quantify the distributions of points on the attractor as reconstructedfrom time series in the neurosciences (Grassberger and Procaccia, 1983; Mayer-Kress, 1986; Ott et al, 1994). Several sets of programs are available for itscomputation (for example, Sprott and Rowlands, 1991). Generally, a correlationsum (“integral”, R(ε) ) is computed from a starting point by counting all subsequentpoint pairs with distances between them less than ε as ε→0 and plottingD2lim ln( R( ε)= . D 2 is computed for increasing embedding (and thereforeε → 0 ln( ε)hypercube) dimension, d, until D 2 achieves an asymptotic plateau, it “saturates”(Ding et al, 1993).It is generally the case that D 0 ≥ D 1 ≥ D 2 (Farmer et al, 1983).229In his statistical explorations of experimental results in hydrodynamicturbulence, Mandelbrot (1974) called attention to the need for a multiplicity ofcharacteristic scaling exponents, a range of values for each exponent and theirsensitivity to orbital point density distributions (the latter called the Sinai-Ruelle-Bowen or natural measure (Eckmann and Ruelle, 1985)). These needs grew out ofthe intrinsic heterogeneity in the time dynamics and the nonuniform pointdistributions in phase space of orbitally divergent, real physical systems. Even withrelatively uniform orbital point distributions, it is intuitively obvious that as ε → 0, thesmaller ε- cubes are over-represented and larger ε- cubes are under-represented inthe M(ε) computation (Farmer et al, 1983). For a concrete example, the fraction ofthe total number of cubes containing say 75% of the points would obviouslydecrease as the ε-lengths studied gets smaller. Normalizing the D i measures withrespect to point densities would correct for this systematic distortion. In addition, thenon-systematic influence of real system heterogeneity and non-uniformity in bothtime and reconstruction space distributions makes the need for relating the D imeasures to the natural measure even more pressing.The derivation of many separate scaling exponents, as well as globalgeneralized exponents and the incorporation of point densities in their computation,has been approached by a kind of method of moments (Renyi, 1970; Grassberger,1983; Hentschel and Procaccia, 1983; Halsey et al, 1986; Mayer-Kress, 1986; Ott etal, 1994). We outline the general arguments here so that the reader will begenerally familiar with the ideas and terms, not to serve as a definitive summary. Itis a complicated area and the reader will find the required detailed descriptions inthe references. .We recall that with respect to a statistical distribution, the first moment is themean; the second moment, σ 2 , the variance; the third moment, σ 3 , the distribution’sasymmetry, the skew; and the fourth moment, σ”, its relative peakedness withrespect to the probability mass in the tail, called the kurtosis. In these momentcomputations of an observableqx i’s deviation from the mean, |x − x| , the value forq accentuate particular regions of the density distribution. Similarly, the q’s of thei230“generalized dimensions,” D q , emphasize different aspects of the relative pointdensity that are assumed to be uniform in the computation of D 0 . We recall fromabove that the power law slope constituting Dln M( ε)limε ln( ε)0 = →o. If we emphasize thecomponent of the probability (measure, µ) or, equivalently, time spent by the orbit incube i, µ( C i) instead of simply the number of cubes occupied by any points, M(ε),along with the different length scales of the cube as ε→0 we have a generalizeddimension. A common expression for the generalized dimension includes thefractional pre-factor in q written so as to make things come out right:M ( ε )IqD = 1 lim ln ( , ε)q, where Iq ( , ε ) = ∑[ µ ( C i)]q −1ε→ 0 ln( ε)i=1the dominance of the higher probability cubes,q. The higher the q, the greaterµ( C i). To see how this q-inducedseparation in emphasis might work, if the ratio for q = 2 between the probabilitycontaining cubes 0.25 and 0.05 is 25, their ratio for q = 3 is 125. For q = 0, thescaling exponent is the capacity dimension. This result of the actions of a changingq has been analogized to the way changing temperature in a thermodynamicsystem evokes different aspects of its behavior.The “multifractal formalism” generally begins by determining the statisticaldensities over a range of scale lengths by one means or another including wavelettransformations across wavelength scale (Arneodo et al, 1988). These densities byscale are then systematically raised to a range of q exponents. Since q, andtherefore D q , can vary continuously, functions are created that shows how D q varieswith q. These are then further transformed, resulting in a single maximum paraboliccurve whose shape and size is sensitive to the conditions of the experiment (Halseyet al, 1986). Generalized dimensions decrease as q increases. A uniqueneuropsychopharmacological application of the multifractal technique to a study ofthe behavioral influence of increasing amounts of cocaine on the time-dependentpatterns of spatial exploration, temporal-spatial fluctuations, in rats, demonstrated aglobal splitting in the parabolic distribution suggestive of a cocaine-induced globalphase transition, not unlike the well-known, dose-dependent, amphetamine-induced231shift from hyperactivity to motor stereotypy (Paulus et al, 1991). Studies thatfollowed demonstrated that “q-moment” distributions of heterogeneous scalingexponents and their relative statistical weightings were useful in making subtlediscriminations between effects of psychopharmacological agents and behavioral(isolation) influences on animal behavior as well as patterns of simple psychomotorbehavior in normal subjects and schizophrenic patients (Paulus et al, 1994; 1996;1998; Krebs-Thomson et al, 1998a; 1998b).Fractal Scaling Measures on Reconstructed Time Series fromBiological DynamicsPublications involving the applications of various D measures, particularly D 2 ,to brain-relevant times series number in the hundreds and are growingexponentially. The following constitutes a brief review of a representative set ofempirical findings. In doing so, for the reasons discussed below, we ignore whatsome might consider the rather abstract and philosophical issue of “determinism”versus “randomness” or “error” (Sugihara and May, 1990; Casdagli, 1991; Waylandet al, 1993; Kaplan and Glass, 1992; Kaplan, 1994) since this question is relativelyunproductive with respect to generating new neurobiological insights, novelexperiments or new quantitative approaches to brain dynamics. In addition, asnoted in the final section, this discrimination may not even have definitive theoreticalmeaning in that the conduct of much of the rigorous mathematics about“deterministic dynamical systems” involve Markoff partitions and matrices which arealso the generic operators of formal probability theory (Sullivan, 1979; Kolmogorov,1950). For example, N-dimensional non-linear Markoff processes can be shown tocapture the dynamics of multidimensional neurobiological processes such as theEEG (Silipo et al, 1998).We have also ignored the related issue of the presence or absence of “lowdimensional structure” (Theiler and Rapp, 1996; Rapp, 1995) which, from theauthors’ point of view, resulted from an unfortunately concrete interpretation of theword “dimensions.” With respect to experimental brain data, dimensions are defined232most relevantly by their computational procedures and what are computed areempirical scaling exponents describing real observables as limited by the precisionof the observations, their resolution and series lengths (Smith, 1988; Eckmann andRuelle, 1992). The “correlation integral,” the probability that two vectors chosen atrandom from the phase space reconstruction lie within “r” distance of each other,not unrelated to the phase randomization controlled, D 2 measure, yields statementsabout amount of “nonlinearity” (not accountable by the linear regressivelycapturable component of the power spectrum), which are also difficult to translateinto experimentally or theoretically useful concepts (Casdagli et al, 1997). Theseefforts contrast with a more direct attempt to establish a spiking neuron system’sdynamical “dimension” using trial and error prediction in which “dimension” wasdefined as the number of potentially physiologically relevant variables required tomake the predictive equations fit (Segundo et al, 1998).Computations of scaling exponent descriptors of orbital point distributions onreconstructed attractors of the brain sciences have proven to be most useful asatheoretical, empirical techniques discriminating experimental, clinical and/ortreatment conditions with various approaches to statistical significance. In thisregard, one can say that D 2 is often found to be superior to central tendencyoriented statistics in making these discriminations. Dimension and correlationintegral descriptors appear least useful when dealing with global issues such aschaos, randomness, linearity and the “underlying dimensions” of (unknown)differential equations. We discuss below the possibility that the failure to find chaosin the more recent EEG studies (Theiler and Rapp, 1996; Prichard et al, 1996) maybe because the EEG attractor is better characterized as a “strange nonchaoticatttractor” with orbital patterns manifesting fractional scaling exponents but no λ( + )(Grebogi et al, 1984; Mandell and Selz, 1993).The relatively subtle influence of high altitude (Mt. Everest) oxygenconcentrations was not seen in the central moments of the cardiac interbeatintervals, but the D 2 of the attactor was reduced significantly (Yamamoto et al,1993). The latencies and amplitudes of the visual evoked potential failed to233discriminate normal subjects from those with early glaucoma, but the reconstructedattractor of the steady state visual cortical response to full field flicker demonstrateda statistically significant decrease in D 2 (Schmeisser et al, 1993). Marginalqualitative differences in optokinetic nystagmus were quantitatively significant whenstudied as the D 2 of the attractor’s points in patients with vertigo compared withcontrols (Aasen et al, 1997). Reconstructions of maximum velocity waves fromDoppler studies of middle cerebral artery hemodynamics (using phase random“controls”) demonstrated an increase in D 2 (and a decrease in λ( + ) correlated withage in an adult population (Keuner et al, 1996; Vliegen et al, 1996). D 2 served as asensitive descriptor of functional changes in the EMG from the surface of the bicepsmuscle, increasing with muscle load and rate of flexion and extension anddecreasing with muscle fatigue (Rapp et al, 1993; Nieminen and Takala, 1996;Gupta et al, 1997), suggesting its use in suspected early myotonic dystrophies andmyasthenias. Reconstructed time series of stomatognathic motions in high schoolstudents with temporomandipular joint syndromes compared with those withmalocclusion revealed a specific decrease in D 0 in the plane of horizontal motion inthe former (Morinushi et al, 1998). Time series of plasma growth hormone levels inacromegalic patients with functioning pituitary adenomas manifested a statisticallysignificant increase in D 0 when compared with age-matched controls (Mandell andSelz, 1997) which corresponded nicely to the reduction in “approximate entropy”(Pincus, 1991a) computed on this same data set (Hartman et al, 1994). On theother hand, comparative in vitro studies of growth hormone release patterns innormal rat pituitary cells and their neoplastically transformed relatives, the GH3strain, demonstrate a decrease in D 0 in the latter (Guillemin et al, 1983; Mandell,1986).The number of examples of the use of D 2 on orbital point geometries inexplorations of physiological and pharmacological regulation are increasing. The D 2of respiratory rhythms is higher with intact vagal afferents than without (Sammonand Bruce, 1991). Histamine induced an increase in D 2 in the attractor pointdistribution of rabbit ear artery vasomotion, attributed to calcium-activatedmembrane potassium channels in that TEA prevented and reversed the change234(Edwards and Griffith, 1997). The role of central and autonomic innervation incardiac interval dynamics has been explored using D 2 in various ways. Forexamples, the transplanted heart rhythm in man has a lower D 2 than that of thenormal heart (Guzzetti et al, 1996) and general anesthesia and cholinergic (but notβ-adrenergic) blockade decreased multisystem D 2 in a series of multiparameter(respiration, mean blood pressure and heart rate) studies in piglets (Zwiener et al,1996; Hoyer et al, 1998).The activities of single and aggregates of neurons are being described anddifferentiated by the D 2 of their interevent interval attractors. Early and importantstudies related to both neuronal and field electrical activity indicated their promise(Rapp et al, 1985; Zimmerman and Rapp, 1991). The olefactory bulb demonstratedspatially uniform scaling dimensions that changed with event-related perturbation(Skinner et al, 1990). An iron-induced spiking focus in the rat hippocampus in vivomanifested the same decrease in D 2 as it did in the kindled in vitro hippocampalslice (Koch et al, 1992). D 2 also differentiated among characteristic single unit timeseries in norepinephrine, dopamine and serotonin neurons (Selz and Mandell,1991) and among A8, A9 and A10 dopamine neurons (Selz and Mandell, 1992).Attractors reconstructed from single unit interspike intervals in the substantia nigrapars compacta and the auditory thalamus manifested discriminatable values for D 2in neurons recorded by the same electrode (Celletti and Villa, 1996) and changes instate manifested in patterns of subthreshold oscillations in single neurons in theinferioir olivary nucleus could be characterized using this index (Makarenko andLlinas, 1998).D 2 reliably discriminated between states of arousal and between themultiparameter (eye movements, neck muscle tone, EEG stage) defined EEGstages of sleep (Bablyoyantz, 1986; Rapp et al, 1989; Ehlers et al, 1991) with non-REM having a lower D 2 than REM. D 2 of the EEG record was selectively reduced inStage II and REM in schizophrenic patients compared with controls (Roschke andAldenhoff, 1993), this difference was made more prominent by treatment with theaminodiazopoxide, lorazepam (Roschke and Aldenhoff, 1992). In the waking state,235higher EEG D 2 values were frontal in schizophrenic patients and more central incontrols (Elbert et al, 1992). The D 2 computed on the EEG during Stage IV (“delta”)sleep was sensitive to acute sleep deprivation and recovery, but demonstratedcompensation (Cerf et al, 1996). Non-alcholic children of alcoholic parentsmanifested lower values for D 1 in their EEG attractors than the children of a normalcontrol group (Ehlers et al, 1995). Higher I.Q. correlated with EEG D 2 in most leadsin the resting state but not during a visual imagery task (Lutzenberger et al, 1992).These differences also correlated with individual differences in task performance ina perceptual pattern predictive task (Gregson et al, 1990) and with a workingmemory task load with regional differences most marked in the right fronto-temporalcortex (Sammer, 1996).Peripheral nerve stimulation in the earlobe and trapezius muscle inducedincrements in D 2 in the EEG of specific brain regions (Heffernan, 1996). Memory forbut not induced pain increased EEG D 2 in chronic pain patients but not in normalcontrols (Lutzenberger et al, 1997). Using contingent reinforcement of brain wavemodes by hypothalamic, but not cerebral hemispheric, stimulation reduced D 2 in theEEG (Mogilevskii et al, 1998) resembling the changes accompanying defensivereflex conditioning in the rabbit between the early and late stages of the process(Efremova and Kulikov, 1997). Difficult to diagnose “periodic lateralized epileptiformdischarge” syndromes have apparently yielded to D 2 computations (Stam et al,1998). In equally problematic “atypical seizure” syndromes in children, D 2 computedon the autocovariance functions of 200 Hz digitized EEG records from multiplechannels demonstrated characteristic changes (Yaylali et al, 1996).Unlike computing a reliable leading λ( + ) on a point set of a time seriesreconstruction denoting the “sensitivity to initial conditions” requirement for thediagnosis of chaos (and a potential for change such that a decrease in the positivityof λ( + ) → λ( 0)may auger a nearby bifurcation), the presence of a fractional scalingexponent,D i, does not in and of itself implicate a chaotic dynamical state. A niceexample of a nonchaotic dynamic withλ = 0 that has a fractional scaling exponent,D = 0.538, is the “Feigenbaum” point where the above noted “infinite” series of236period doubling bifurcations accumulate (Grassberger, 1981). This is a dust-likeregion, which when endlessly dilated looks like the same dust. Somemathematicians call these objects “Lebesgue points” because even though at lowmagnifications when they look rather solid, they are not. Composed of points, theyhave topological measure zero (a line has measure one) and non-integer fractaldimension. These λ = 0 , D ≠ Integer, period doubling accumulation points can befound in a wide variety of attractors, though in each case the parameter space inwhich they are located is so small (in point set topology also called “Lebesguemeasure zero”) that they are very difficult to locate and therefore have little chanceof being physiologically significant.This constrasts with a relatively new category of dynamical systems whichpromises to be important in studies of the nervous system. These are ones that aredriven by two or more independent frequencies (called quasiperiodic driving). Wefound them to be relevant to brain stem, thalamocortical neurophysiology ofperceptual processes and states of consciousness. They have the properties,λ = 0 , D 0 and D 1 ≠ integer and a characteristic scaling “spectral distributionfunction” (see below). They have been named “strange nonchaotic attractors”(Grebogi et al, 1984; Romeiras et al, 1987; Ding et al, 1989). In addition, thestrange nonchaotic behavior of these quasiperiodically-driven, nonlinear oscillatorshas positive (>0) measure in parameter space and thus is of potential physiologicalsignificance. A good demonstration of a multiple frequency driven strangenonchaotic attractor can be found and manipulated in the software package ofNusse and Yorke (1991).The neurobiological substrate for this system is the brain stem neuronalmodulatory driving of on- going thalamocortcal oscillatory brain waves (once called“recruitment waves” in the 7-14 Hz, θ to α, day dreaming to quiet alert range) andas perturbed by multifrequency driving in what was once called “reticular formationarousal” are realized as dominant EEG modes and associated states of perceptualacuity and consciousness (Moruzzi and Magoun 1949; Moruzzi, 1960; Klemm,1990; Steriade and McCarley, 1990; Contreras et al, 1997). In addition to intrinsic237multiply periodic and aperiodic oscillations of thalamic and cortical cells and theirrecursive, feedback coupling, the brain stem manifests more than two orders ofmagnitude of “independent” neuronal driving frequencies ranging from serotonindischarges at 1 Hz, cortically direct dopamine and norepinephrine neurons in the10-50Hz range and mesencephalic reticular neurons discharging as fast as 100 to200 Hz. The “thalamocortical brain wave oscillator” as their target has been a fixturein global state neurophysiology since the 1940’s and 1950’s and is of great currentinterest (Fessard et al, 1961; Bazhenov et al, 1998). We have explored therelationships between strange nonchaotic dynamics and brain-stem neuronal andthalamocortical physiology from the standpoint of neuronal coding and theproperties of the EEG attractor. (Mandell et al, 1991; Mandell and Kelso, 1991;Mandell and Selz, 1992; 1993;1994;1997a). We found that the EEG attractor couldbe characterized by the diagnostic triad identifying strange nonchaotic attractors:λ = 0 , D 0 and D 1 ≠ Integer, and a signatory power spectral distribution in which thenumber of peaks, N, with amplitudes greater than ϖ, N(ϖ ), went as ϖ -α , 1 < α < 2(Romeiras et al, 1987; Mandell et al, 1991). In addition to being consistent withknown multifrequency, brain stem driving of thalamocortical oscillations, the EEG asa strange, nonchaotic attractor is intuitively appealing in that it has the necessarymechanisms for the power law scaling of a wide range of characteristic times (D 0and D 1 ≠ Integer) from picosecond fluctuations of neural membrane proteins to thedecades of bipolar phenomena and since λ = 0 , the orbital points don’t tend to“mix”(get out of order) on the attractor, thus protecting the fidelity of sequencedependent brain information transport (Berns and Sejnowski, 1998).Entropies, Unstable Periodic Orbits and Shadowing; Short Time SeriesCan Discriminate Experimental Conditions in Studies of Biological DynamicsWe avoid the temptation to deal with the deep analogy betweenthermodynamic entropy (Clausius, 1897) and information theoretic entropy(Shannon and Weaver, 1949), constraining our discussion to the context of anoperational equivalence (in healthy systems) between gain of information and238decrease in entropy in brain-relevant dynamical systems. As we shall see, certainpathophysiological processes appear to manifest themselves as reductions inbackground or “resting” state entropy which then limits its supply with respect toinformation gain and/or transport. Relationships between “physical” thermodynamicobservables, such as changes in heat capacity or temperature dependence ofkinetic constants, and information-transport driven, neurotransmitter evokedconformational changes in neural membrane proteins may someday come togetherin an experimentally productive way (Hitzemann et al, 1985; Zeman et al, 1987;Borea et al, 1988), but they are beyond the scope of this paper.The idea of taming the orbit of an expanding flow (with at least one λ( + )) bypartitioning the geometric space supporting its actions, its “manifold,” and thenlabeling each box so that its trajectory is representable by a symbol string of boxindices is the way “symbolic dynamics” are applied to dynamical systems. Symbolicdynamics arose in pure mathematics in the context of obtaining a one-to-one,topological (sequence not distance preserving ) representation of a difficult tocharacterize system of “geodesics on surfaces of negative curvature” (Hadamard,1898; Morse, 1917; Morse and Hedlund, 1938). Geodesics here are the shortestlines in this curved, non-Euclidean space in which nearby lines spread apart and faraway ones came together with (in Euclidian space) parallel lines meeting at infinity.Remarkably, symbolic dynamic encoding of the motions on this abstractmanifold of negative curvature also capture how uniformly divergent (andconvergent), “hyperbolic” chaotic systems, such as brain systems, behave inEuclidean space, an intuitive similarity about which Poincare experienced hisfamous vacation bus trip epiphany (Stillwell, 1985). It should also be noted thatencoding neural spike trains in one dimension for symbolic dynamical comparisonsof sequence structure and recurrances, “favored patterns” has been developedindependently of orbital dynamics on manifolds (Dayhoff, 1984; Dayhoff andGerstein, 1983a; 1983b). A similar approach has been used to characterize firingpatterns and their response to acupuncture in dopamine neurons in the substantianigra and hypothalamic neurons (Chen and Ku, 1992).239For real neurobiological data, a time series and its n time delays are firstreconstructed as a trajectory in an n+1 dimensional geometric embedding spaceand, following partition of that geometric space into n+1 dimensional lettered boxes(the choice of partition being a sensitive step), what was once an orbit has becomea sequence of symbols. Dynamical systems in geometric space become symbolicdynamics in sequence space. It was Kolmogoroff (1958) who first appliedShannon’s ideas of entropy and information (Shannon and Weaver, 1949; Khinchin,1957) to the quantification of these dynamical system’s telegraphic messages asdiscrete, “stochastic” (random, probabilistic) output. Kolmogoroff turned to Shannonentropy,−∑ p ilog p i(where p = 1/n and n = number of possibilities) to decide thequestion whether a dynamical system that naturally partitioned into a two or threebox system per unit time had the same entropy. His answer was no, that –3(1/3 ln(1/3)) = 1.098 > -2(1/2 ln (1/2) = 0.6931 loge and in computer relevant log 2 , 1.5850 >1.0 (Kolmogorov, 1959). Entropy increases with possibility.Nonlinear differential equations representing brain-relevant expandingdynamical systems replace Shannon’s linguistically weighted and serially ordered,Markoff-dependent random number generator of probabilistic language. As notedabove, in the case of the Sharkovskii sequences (Sharkovskii, 1964; Metropolis etal, 1973; Misiurewicz, 1995), a small change in the single parameter of an entireclass of single maximum maps generating motions that are coded from theirposition at the left or right of center of the unit interval, alters and determinesprecisely the periodic output such as {1,0,0,1,0,1,1,0,0,1,0,1…) of its binarymessage. In higher dimensional examples such as the Rössler and Lorenzsystems, one can visualize the joint actions of λ( + ) and λ( − ) moving the trajectoryso as to both enter, “create,” new boxes and generate new letters as well as visit oldones, unstable fixed points, thus forming unstable periodic orbits. The latter, one ofthree diagnostic features of chaotic attractors (see above), can also be seen asresulting from the “coarse-grained” imprecision of real world neurobiologicalmeasurement such that two points that are brought close to attractive-repellingpoints are, within measurement error, recorded as having the same value.240Problems of measurement precision, amplified by the expansive actions ofsystems that are sensitive to initial conditions, yield parameter sensitive entropies oftwo (mathematically) fundamental kinds called topological and metric entropies, h Tand h M , proven to be the upper and lower bounds of any estimate of the entropy in auniformly expanding and/or equidistributed system (Adler and Weiss, 1965).Measures of entropy, as “missing information related to the number of alternativeswhich remain possible to a physical system” (Boltzmann, 1909), “index ofprobability” (Gibbs, 1902) or the “amount of uncertainty associated with a finitescheme” (Khinchin,1957) are obviously sensitive to the partition rules and itsfineness of the grain. The most theoretically defensible partition is called the“generating partition” in which no box contains more than one point. Comparisons ofcontrol and experimental data can be differentially sensitive to partition construction,so that if a generating partition is not practicable due to sample length or densecurdling in the point distribution, some arbitrary choices have to be made. Thesehave included naturally renormalized variational partitions, such that in onedimension the boxes are defined by ±1, ±2, ±3,…standard deviations, or quartiles orquintile, above and below the mean and in n dimensions. Partitions have also beenconstructed and used to described drug effects on rat exploratory behavior bysequential partitioning along the dimension of the highest remaining variation (afterthe previous partition) called the “KD” partition (Paulus et al, 1991). Partitionstrategies to capture entropic measures on serial ordering (Klemm and Sherry,1981; Strong et al, 1998) can grow from knowledge or hypotheses about thephysiological sources of temporal irregularities and discontinuities in brain dynamicsincluding characteristic interval(s) of refractoriness, relaxation times of the inhibitorysurround, correlation time in dendritic tree summation, the time course of reciprocalinhibition and its decay and chemical influences such as the synaptic half-life andtime of action of inhibitory influences such as GABA on cell firing.The logarithmic growth rates of occupancy of new symbolically indexedboxes or, equivalently, the growth rates of visitations to old ones generatingunstable periodic orbits, are called topological entropies, h T . They record newhappenings, the growth rate of the diversity of orbits, and not how likely with respect241to box occupancy densities they are likely to occur ( Adler et al, 1964; Alexeev andJacobson, 1981; Cornfield et al, 1982; Ornstein, 1989; Ruelle, 1990). The closerelationships in real brain observables between the appearance rate of newsymbols or new unstable periodic orbits, h T , and log λ( + ), reflecting the rate ofdivergence from the next expected value generating a new, unexpected value, isnot surprising. In fact, a maximal estimate of the entropy of a dynamical system, h T= log λ( + ) whereas the largest value that h M can attain is log(#of states). A greatdeal of substantial mathematics has gone into proofs that similarities (“equivalencerelations”) and differences between dynamical patterns are robustly indicated bydifferences in h T and h M (Adler et al, 1977; Adler and Marcus, 1979).If the sum of the densities in each j box were normalized so as to sum to 1.0,such that each is a probability, p j , then - Σ p j log p j represents the metric entropy,h M . h M was first described in the dynamical context by Kolmogorov (1958;1959).The sum having a –1 prefactor converts the negative log of < 1 to a meaningfulpositive value in the expression. h M is maximal for the equidistributed, uniformlyexpansive, C or Axiom A systems (see above). As noted above, generally h T = themaximum estimate of the entropy and h M the minimum estimate (Adler and Weiss,1965). h T = h M in uniformly hyperbolic systems (Bowen, 1975) and the difference,|h T – h M | is an index of non-uniformity found useful in discriminating among classesof single neurons from their discharge patterns (Mandell, 1987; Selz and Mandell,1992; Mandell and Selz, 1993; Mandell and Selz, 1997a). These measures appliedto temporal and spatial patterns of rat exploratory behavior have been used todiscriminate among stimulant drug effects (Paulus et al, 1990; Paulus and Geyer,1992). Similar computations involving the symbolic dynamics and disallowedtransitions have been used to study the complexity of the the EEG (Xu, 1994) inwhich both extremely low (fixed point, periodic) and high (Gaussian random)entropies are seen as manifesting low “complexity as a function of the diversity ofthe available patterns of behavior (Crutchfield and Young, 1989a).Before describing the simple but definitional matrix operations for h T and h Mbelow which might seem forbidding to those “not up on their linear algebra,” we note242that procedures such exponentiation of a matrix can be carried out automaticallyusing computer algebra programs such as Maple or for data processing available ascomputational modules in MatLab.One of the techniques for the computation of h T involves determining thelogarithm of the asymptotic growth rate of the major diagonal (“trace”) in thetransition matrix symbolically encoding the trajectory which would therefore countthe “self visitations” of each indexed boxes as the dynamics proceed. This involvessetting up a transition incidence matrix, each box scored for a disallowed, 0, orallowed, 1, transitions and the matrix is exponentiated t times with the logarithm ofthe asymptotic growth rate of the sum of the diagonal values serving as a (leadingeigenvalue) estimate of h T . More technical considerations involving the Frobenius-Perron theorem guaranteeing the existence of such an logarithmic index of newinformation generation rates, even in random matrices (Seneta, 1981), will not bediscussed here.We have found that computing h T in this way is empirically useful for difficultto obtain or only transiently stationary brain data series. Even with relatively shortsamples lengths, if one is willing to make the pragmatic assumption of “temporarystationarity” or “things as they are right now will, for the sake of argument, go onforever” (perhaps the best we can do with intrinsically transient brain phenomena)then this “freeze framed” representation of reality yields an asymptotic measure onrelatively short sample lengths since they are computationally infinite. A similarapproach to h M , requires repeatedly exponentiating a Markoff matrix constructedfrom relatively short samples and generates the probabilistic (eigenvector) “dual” ofh T. h M computed in this way serves as a useful quantity, h M called by some theKolmogorov entropy in comparisons of control and experimental conditions of thesame sample lengths. Systematic decreases in h M (“Kolmogorov entropy”) havebeen shown to accompany increasing “depth” of sleep using standard sleep stagingtechniques (Gallez and Babloyantz, 1991) and increases in h M were associated withboth positive and negative emotional states induced by movies (Aftanas et al,1997).243h T and λ( + ) have been analogized to what is called algorithmic complexity,which quantifies a computer algorithm’s minimal representation of a symbolsequence as it grows longer (Chaitin, 1974; Bennett, C.H., 1982; Nicolis, 1986;Rissanen, 1982; Crutchfield and Young, 1989b). Examples of applications of apseudocomputational compression scheme have quantified differences amongprotein sequences (Ebling and Jimenez-Montano, 1980), discriminated therapistdirected“transference” manifestations in verbally encoded processes inpsychotherapy (Rapp et al, 1991), characterized neural spike train patterns in apenicillin kindled spike focus (Rapp et al, 1994), differentiated among spikesequence patterns of biogenic amine families of brain stem neurons (Mandell andSelz, 1994) and as a sample length-dependent rate, in content-free, mouse drivencomputer tasks differentiated borderline from obsessive-compulsive personalitypatterns (Selz and Mandell, 1997).Computation of lexical complexity is a good example of this approach. Thisprocedure recursively surveys the sequence of symbols for the longest word, where“words” are subsequences that appear at least three times if they contain two lettersor at least twice if they contain more than two letters. Upon finding a longestrepeated word, the compression algorithm replaces all occurances of this word witha single distinct (new) symbol and looks again for the longest repeated word in themodified sequence. When the sequence cannot be further recursively compressed,there may remain identical adjacent symbols in the sequence. These are coded asthe symbol raised to the power of the number of its adjacent occurances. Thisexponent cannot exceed five because six adjacent identical symbols would be twooccurances of a three letter word. The numerical value of the lexical complexity issimply the sum of the number of distinct symbols and the (sum of the) logarithm ofthe exponents of the symbol sequences (Ebling and Jimenez-Montano, 1980).A clear account of algorithmic and lexical complexity in relationship to othermeasures of “complexity” in the context of brain relevant research data can befound in Rapp and Schmah (1996). The relationship between thermodynamic andergodic, measure theories in relationship to forced-dissipative dynamics and the244role of self-intersection on manifolds in this new source of irreversibility (with aresulting “arrow of time”) is developed in Mackey (1992).As noted, the skeleton which configures attractors is composed of unstable,“saddle” fixed points, each of which attract (iron down) the trajectory along onedimension and repel or spread it out along another. Systems fulfilling the criteria fora chaotic dynamical system have the property of a countably infinite number ofunstable periodic orbits composed of these unstable fixed points. Depending uponparameters, the orbital points can pull up their tails to be discrete with respect toeach other or spread along the unstable direction to connect smoothly with othersalong a curve such as a saddle cycle. Parametric control of the strengths andstructures of the saddle point skeleton of typical attractors can be used to changeboth the rate of generation of novel symbols as well as recurrances to old ones inthe symbolic dynamics generating a brain dynamical system’s lexagraphic products(Bowen, 1978; Alexeev and Jacobson, 1981)).Using a variety of techniques to algorithmically register “return times,”experimental condition-sensitive “saddle orbits” composing unstable periodic orbitshave been demonstrated in geometric reconstructions of real data series generatedby a 40+ component chemical reaction (Lathrop and Kostelich, 1989), in responseto natural stimuli in the time dependent behavior of the crayfish caudalphotoreceptor (Pei and Moss, 1996) and in the interburst interval sequencesrecorded in hippocampal slices of the rat (So et al, 1997; So et al, 1998). If thereader uses the software listed above to simulate the time evolution of one of theseattractors of abstract or real systems , she will learn that a remarkably small numberof points, a very short time sample, will outline, “shadow” (Bowen, 1978), thecomplete array of unstable fixed points before filling in the attractor. It is tempting tospeculate about the potential nervous system relevance of this dynamicalanticipation of the attractor’s recognizable geometry, as well as a precis of what thesymbolic dynamics are going to say occurs many time steps before filling in theattractor and its asymptotic message. Values of the measures made on the earlyunstable periodic orbit arrays such h T , h M and λ( + ), resemble very closely those245made on their attractors when they were much more densely filled (Lathrop andKostelich , 1989). Bowen’s “shadow lemma” in support of a thin film of points overthe skelton of unstable fixed points of attractors is the fundamental reason that shortsample length time series can often discriminate between control and experimentalconditions in brain research studies.Another recently implemented entropy, called “approximate entropy,” isexploiting the underlying unstable fixed point skeletal shadowing principle inexpansive dynamical systems to find statistically significant differences betweencontrol and experimental results in reasonably short, physiologically realistic,sample lengths (Pincus, 1991; Pincus et al, 1991). This algorithm is somewhatderivative of those involved in the computation of the correlation dimension (seeabove). Instead of computing across a range (and taking the limits) of embeddingdimensions, d, and sequential paired-vectorial distances, ε, it empirically tailors andfixes them to compute a “logarithmic likelihood” that points remains close throughincremental change in the time series. The “approximate entropy” is not easilyrelatable to either h T and h M. One is tempted to predict that this geometricallyoriented algorithm might be fooled into a postive entropy diagnosis if applied tostrange, nonchaotic dynamical systems with fractal dimension but no λ( + ) -relatedmixing. Since sequence position is conserved in this computation, twosimultaneously studied (“multiparameter”) systems can be examined for their mutualcoherence as the “cross approximate entropy.” Among the interesting findings fromapplications of this index to neuroendocrine studies are an increase in approximateentropy in LH and FSH secretory patterns with age in both sexes, perhapsquantitatively heralding menopause (Pincus and Minkin, 1998) and decreased crossapproximate entropy, a decrease in regulatory coupling between ACTH and cortisolsecretion patterns in patients with Cushing’s syndrome (Roelfsema et al, 1998).Among the many of other empirically derived entropies, one is called “powerspectral entropy,” which is equivalent to the normalized variance of the distributionof frequencies in a power spectral transformation of a time series (Farmer et al,1980). This has been successfully applied to brain enzyme and receptor fluctuations246(Russo and Mandell, 1984a; Mandell, 1984), and, more recently, to multiplesimultaneously EEG leads which demonstrated focal increases in epileptic patients(Inouye et al, 1991; 1992). An entropy derived from the quantification of the failuresin temporal forecasting of EEG signals increased in the fronto-temporal region withdrug treatment in patients with Alzheimer’s syndrome (Pezard et al, 1998).With respect to their implications for the clinical neurosciences, changes indynamical entropy in behavior of brain dynamical systems has been regarded in twogeneral ways: (1) Since representation of information requires the resolution ofrelevant ambiguity, a nonrelevant and global reduction in the dynamical entropy of abrain system (Stage IV sleep EEG slow waves, neuronal fixed point or regularlyperiodic activity, extrapyramidal motor tremor, fixed paranoid or obsessionalmentation, the actions of some anxiolytics and antipsychotics ) reduces its potentialfor information encoding and transport. In contrast, “arousal” induced increases inthe measures of entropy in brain wave and neuronal discharge patterns (pre-taskwarning signals, motivating conditions, stimulant drugs) are associated withimproved psychophysical receptive and discrimination functions, learning rates andmemory. (2) Regarding as potentially pathophysiological both of the two extremesof entropy generation, fixed point and periodic behavior as the lowest and fair coinflipping, “Bernoulli” randomness as the highest, another descriptor, “complexity” isdefined as maximal (optimal) midway through the entropy range, making a new kindof parabolic entropy curve (Bennett, 1986; Crutchfield and Young, 1989a).In analogy with an optimal amalgam of periodic rotations and coin flips, inhigher dimension, the most meaningful maximum complexity of real, nonuniformlyexpansive processes may derive from a multiplicity of measure invariants,symmetries, of the system such as the growth rate of unstable periodic orbits,divergence of the tail of a density distribution and specifiable linguistic variablessuch as word length and redundancy. The more symmetries, the more potential forcomplicated information encoding and transport with the maximum complexitylocated midrange in each one. We have pursued the hypothesis that entropy is aconserved property in the healthy brain and that complementarity in other statisticalmeasure mechanisms make that possible. For example, in uniformly expansive,247idealized systems, topological entropy has been proven be equivalent to the productof an index of expansion and the dimension of the support such that an increase inexpansiveness , λ( + ), is compensated by a decrease in D 0 leaving h T invariant(Manning,1981). This relationship has also been found in the behavior of somenonuniformly expansive neuroendocrine, neuronal and human behavioral systems(Mandell and Selz, 1995; Smotherman et al, 1996; Mandell and Selz, 1997a;).Is Randomness Versus Determinism a Productive Question for the BiologicalSciences? Are There Better Ones?Measures made on realistically nonuniformly expansive behavior ofdynamical systems emerging from nonlinear differential equations and that arisingfrom a variety of non-classical random walk models overlap such that making whatmay be more a metaphysical discrimination at this point is labor intensive,contentious and unproductive for generating new experimental work in theneurosciences. It is important to note that random walk theory and computation hasmatured to such an extent that almost any “nonlinear dynamical behavior” can, withrespect to statistical measure, be modeled using one of many varieties. Forexamples, power law distributions in continuous time random walks (times ofmovement are also randomly chosen) , random walks with traps (temporarilyimmobilizing the trajectory like unstable fixed points), random walks in randomenvironments, time of passage of ants in a labyrinth and Levy leaps and localdiffusive exploration (looking for a wallet) among many others can represent muchof the irregular behavior we observe in the brain (Shlesinger et al, 1982; Montrolland Shlesinger, 1984; Hughes, 1995; Klafter et al, 1996). On the other hand,(Markoff) partition of the sequence and a probabilistic style of analysis of nonlineardynamical systems has been a major strategy for description and quantificationfrom the field’s beginnings (Parry, 1964; Adler and Weiss, 1967; Bowen, 1970;Lasota and Yorke, 1973). The issue of randomness versus determinism remainscurrent although many if not most properties of deterministic dynamical systems can248be simulated with a suitably constructed random process and all of our randomnumber generators are deterministic.This theoretical blind alley is reminiscent of the decades lost partialing outcausal attributes of nature versus nurture before knowledge of dynamical influenceson nucleotide dynamics was available. It is perhaps unfortunate that for finite lengthreal data, “house keeping requirements” (Ruelle, 1990; Rapp, 1993;1994) and“warnings on the label” with various random sequence, random phase controls(“surrogate data”) have become so intimidating to those of us in the early stages ofexploring the use of these theories and methods in the brain sciences. Currently the“controls” are more relevant to abstract statistical processes and what can be saidabout them rather than generating and addressing new claims and the controls forthem related to quantitatively oriented, experimental brain physiology.Statistical caveats have arisen to retard the emergence of potentiallyimportant and robust neurophysiologically-relevant phenomena. For example, arecent well conducted and analyzed study of the influence of low doses of ethanol in32 normal male subjects, which honored almost all of the current analytic ritualsincluding sequence and phase randomized surrogate data and searches for thecontinuity features of deterministic dynamical systems such as time asymmetry,concluded that the drug “reduced the evidence for nonlinear dynamical structure” inthe brain (Ehlers et al, 1998). Though honoring the currently popular statisticalrituals, what appears to be missing here are suggestions for new neurobiological ormathematical intuitions that will lead to the design of the next experiment.We now see that it is now possible to use these new ideas and methods toask and at least partially answer more specific questions relevant to the clinicallyoriented neurosciences such as: whether increases in lithium-inducedexpansiveness and mixing in the dynamics of brain enzymes, neurons and behaviorhelp explicate a mechanism of de-coherence in bipolar disease (Mandell et al,1985); do these approaches to membrane conductance fluctuations suggest a newway to think about ion channel dynamics (Liebovitch, 1990); can alcohol-inducedchanges in statistical dynamics of the EEG predict genetic predilection in males to249alcoholism (Ehlers et al, 1995); do these approaches suggest a new neuraldynamical mechanism for the actions of anticonvulsant drugs (Zimmerman et al,1991); can these measures made on non-verbal, psychomotor tasks yield a nonintrusivemeasure of personality and character (Selz, 1992); can these approachesto deviant patterns of psychomotor sequencing in schizophrenics give us someinsight into potential (cerebeller-basal ganglia?) mechanisms of the thought disorderin schizophrenia (Paulus et al, 1994); does cocaine induce new patterns of behaviorthat conserve pre-treatment entropy in developing animals (Smotherman et al,1996); will these quantities applied to objective gait observables supply earlydiagnoses and quantification of clinical course in patients with extra-pyramidaldisorders or taking anti-psychotic medication (Hausdorff et al, 1998); can thesetransformations of time series on the EEG give us an early diagnostic approach toAlzheimer’s disease (Jeong et al, 1998) or a new acute preventive pharmacologicalapproach to patients with psychomotor and partial seizures (Iasemidis et al, 1990).To end where we began: We think that if neuroscientists “did their own”nonlinear dynamical theory and analysis, shaped and tailored by intuitions growingout of their own experimental work and thinking, abstract and philosophicalquestions about what is determinism and what is random would retreat in favor ofnew specific ideas and experiments about brain dynamical mechanisms and theirpathophysiology. From the studies reviewed here, it appears that a robust move inthis direction in the brain sciences is well underway.250ReferencesAasen,T.,Kugiumtzis,D.,Nordahl,G. (1997) Procedure for estimating the correlationdimension of optokinetic nystagmus signals. Comput Biomed Res. 30:95-116Accardo, A., Mumolo, E.(1998): An algorithm for the automatic differentiationbetween the speech of normals and patients with Friedreich's ataxia based on theshort-time fractal dimension. Comput Biol. Med. 28:75-89Adler, R.J., Feldman, R.E., Taqqu, M. (1998) A Practical Guide to Heavy Tails;Statistical Techniques and Applications. Birkhauser. BostonAdler, R.L., Goodwyn, L.W., Weiss, B. (1977) Equivalence of topological Markovshifts. Isreal J. Math. 27:49-63Adler, R.L., Konheim, A.G., McAndrew, M.H. (1964) Topological entropy. Trans.Amer. Math. Soc. 114:309-319Adler, R.L., Marcus, B. (1979) Topological entropy and equivalence of dynamicalsystems. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 219:Adler, R.L., Weiss, B. (1967) Entropy, a complete metric invariant forauthomorphisms of the torus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 57:1573-1576Aftanas, L.I.,Lotova, N.V., Koshkarov, V.I., Pokrosvskaja, V.L., Popov, S.A.,Makhnev, V.P (1997) Non-linear analysis of emotion EEG: calculation ofKolmogorov entropy and the principal Lyapunov exponent. Neurosci Lett 226:13-16251Aihara, K., Matsumoto, G., Ikegaya, Y. (1984): Periodic and non-periodic responsesof a periodically forced Hodgkin-Huxley oscillator. J. Theor. Biol. 140:27-38.Aihara, K., Numajiri, T., Matsumoto, G., Kotani, M. (1986): Structures of attractors inperiodically forced neural oscillators. Phys. Lett. A116:313-317Akay, M., Mulder, E.J. (1998) Effects of maternal alcohol intake on fractal propertiesin human fetal breathing dynamics. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 45:1097-1103Alexeev, V.M., Jacobson, M.V. (1981) Symbolic dynamics and hyperbolic dynamicalsystems. Phys. Rep. 75:287-325.Alonso, A., Faure, M.-P., Beaudet, A. (1994): Neurotensin promotes oscillatorybursting behavior and is internalized in basal forebrain cholinergic neurons. J.Neurosci. 14:5778-5792.Anderson, C.A., Mandell, A.J., Selz, K.A., Terry, L.M., Smotherman, W.P., Wong,C.H., Robinson, S.R., Robertson, S.S., Nathanielsz, P.W. (1998) The developmentof nuchal atonia associated with active (REM) sleep in fetal sheep: presence ofrecurrent fractal organization. Brain Res. 787:351-357Arnold, V.I. (1984) Catastrophe Theory. Springer-Verlag. N.Y.Arnold, V.I., Avez, A. (1968) Ergodic Problems in Classical Mechanics. Addison-Wesley. Redwood City, CABabloyantz, A. (1986) Evidence of chaotic dynamics of brain activity during thesleep cycle. In (ed. Mayer-Kress, G) Dimensions and Entropies in Chaotic Systems.Springer-Verlag, 1986252Babloyantz, A., Destexhe, A. (1986) Low dimensional chaos in an instance ofepilepsy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 83:3513-3517.Baker, G.L., Gollub, J.P. (1991) Chaotic Dynamics; An Introduction. CambridgeUniversity Press. CambridgeBassingthwaighte, J., Liebovitch, L., West, B. (1994) Fractal Physiology. OxfordUniversity Press. Oxford.Bayne,W.F., Hwang, S.S. (1985) Effect of nonlinear protein binding on equilibrationtimes for different initial conditions. J Pharm Sci 74:120-123Bazhenov, M., Timofeev, I., Steriade, M., Sejnowski, T.J. (1998) Computationalmodels of thalamocortical augmenting responses. J. Neurosci. 18:6444-6465Bennett, C.H. (1982) Thermodynamics of computation; A review. Intl. J. Theor.Phys. 21:905-946Bennett, C.H. (1986) On the nature and origin of complexity in discrete,homogeneous, locally-interacting systems. Found. Phys. 16:585-604Beard, D.A., Bassingthwaighte, J.B. (1998) Power-law kinetics of tracer washoutfrom physiological systems. Ann Biomed Eng 26:775-779Berge′,P., Pomeau, Y., Vidal, C. (1984) Order Within Chaos. Wiley-Interscience.N.Y.Berlin, Yu. A., Miller, J.R., Plonka, A. (1996) Rate Processes with KineticParameters Distributed over Time and Space. Chem. Physics 212: Special Issue253Berns, G.S., Sejnowski, T.J. (1998) A computational model of how the basal gangliaproduce sequences. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 10:108-121Birkhoff, G.D. (1922): Surface transformations and their dynamical applications.Acta Math. 43:1-119Boiteux, A., Goldbeter, A., Hess, B. (1975): Control of oscillating glycolysis of yeastby stochastic, periodic, and steady source of substrate: a model and experimentalstudy. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 72:3829-33Boltzmann, L. (1909) Wissenschaftliche Abhandlungen (ed. Hassenohrl, F.) Barth,LiepzigBores, P.A., Bertelli, G.M., Gilli, G. (1988) Temperature dependence of the bindingof mu, delta, and kappa agonists to the opirate receptors in guinea-pig brain. Eur. J.Pharmacol. 146:247-252Bowen, R. (1970) Markoff partitions and minimal sets of Axiom A diffeomorphismsAmer. J. Math. 92:907-918Bowen, R. (1975): Equilibrium States and the Ergodic Theory of AnosovDiffeomorphisms. Lect. Notes. Math. 35Bowen, R. (1978) On Axiom A Diffeomorphisms. CBMS Regional ConferenceSeries in Mathematics. Vol 35 A.M.S. Providence, RIBressler, S.L. (1995): Large-scale cortical networks and cognition. Brain. Res. Rev.20:288-304254Briggs, K. (1990) An improved method for estimating Lyapounov exponents ofchaotic time series. Phys. Lett. A151:27-32Brodskii,V.(1998) The nature of the circahoralian (ultradian) intracellular rhythms.Similarity to fractals Izv Akad Nauk Ser Biol 3:316-29Broomhead, D.S., King, G.P. (1986) Extracting qualitative dynamics fromexpeirmental data. Physica D20:217-236.Brown, R., Bryant, P., Abarbanel, H.D. (1991) Computing the Lyapounov spectrumof a dynamical system from an observed time series. Phys. Rev. A43:2787-2806Bryant, P., Brown, R., Abarbanel, H.D. I. (1990) Lyapounov exponents fromobserved time series. Phys. Rev. Lett. 65:1523-1526Bullard, W.P., Guthrie, P.B., Russo, P.V., Mandell, A.J. (1978) Regional andsubcellular distribution and some factors in the regulation of reduced pterins in ratbrain. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Therap. 206:4-20Buzug, Th., Reimers, T., Pfister, G. (1990) Optimal reconstruction of strangeattractorsfrom purely geometrical arguments. Europhys. Lett. 13:605-610Callahan, J., Sashin, J.I. (1987) Models of affect-response and anorexia nervosa.Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 504:241-259Canavier, C.C., Clark, J.W., Byrne, J.H. (1990): Routes to chaos in a burstingneuron. Biophys J. 57:1245-1251Carpenter, G.A. (1979): Bursting phenomena in excitable membranes. SIAM J.Appl. Math. 36:334-352255Casdagli, M. (1991) Chaos and deterministic versus stochastic nonlinear modeling.J. Royal. Stat. Soc. 54B:303-328Casdagli, M.C., Iasemidis, L.D., Savit, R.S., Gilmore, R.L., Roper, S.N.,Sacklellares, J.C. (1997) Non-linearity in invasive EEG recordings from patients withtemporal lobe epilepsy. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophys. 102:98-105Cartwright, M.I., Littlewood, J. (1945): On nonlinear differential equations of thesecond order. J. London. Math. Soc. 20: 180-189Celletti, A.,Villa, A.E.(1996) Low-dimensional chaotic attractors in the rat brain. BiolCybern 74:387-393Cerf, R., Sefrioui, M., Toussaint, M., Luthringer, R., Macher, J.P. (1996) Lowdimensionaldynamic self-organization in delta-sleep: effect of partial sleepdeprivation Biol Cybern 74:395-403Chaitin, G.J. (1974) Information theoretical computational complexity. IEEE Trans.Inform. Theory IT20:10-15.Chay, T.R., Rinzel, J. (1985) Bursting, beating and chaos in an excitable membranemodel. Biophys. J. 47:357-366Chen, Y-Q., Ku, Y-H. (1992) Properties of favored patterns in spontaneous spiketrains and responses of favored patterns to electroacupuncture in evoked trains.Brain Res. 578:297-304Clausius, R. (1897) The Mechanical Theory of Heat. MacMillan London256Coffman, K., McCormick, W.D., Swinney, H.L. (1986) Multiplicity in a chemicalreactions with one-dimensional dynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 56:999-1002Contreras, D., Dextexhe, A., Sejnowski, T.J., Steriade, M. (1997) Spatiotemporalpatterns of spindle oscillations in cortex and thalamus. J. Neurosci. 17:1179-1196Cooper, N.G. (1987): From Cardinals to Chaos, Cambridge University Press,Cambridge.Cornfield, I.P., Fomin, S.V., Sinai, Ya.G. (1982) Ergodic Theory. Springer-Verlag.BerlinCrevier,D.W., Meister,M (1998): Synchronous period-doubling in flicker vision ofsalamander and man. J Neurophysiol. 79:1869-1878Crutchfield, J.P., Young, K. (1989a) Inferring statistical complexity. Phys. Rev. Lett.63:105-108Crutchfield, J.P., Young, K. (1989b) Computation at the onset of chaos. In (ed.Zurek, W.H.) Complexity, Entropy and the Physics of Information. Addison-Wesley.Redwood City, CA.pp 223-269.Cvitanovic′, P. (1989): Universality in Chaos. Adam-Hilger, Bristol.Dayhoff, J.E. (1984) Distinguished words in data seqauences; analysis andapplications to neural coding and other fields. Bull. Math. Biol. 46:529-543Dayhoff, J.E., Gerstein, G.L. (1983a) Favored patterns in spike trains. I. Detection.J. Neurophysiol. 49: 1334-1346257Dayhoff, J.E., Gerstein, G.L. (1983b) Favored patterns in spike trains. II.Applications. J. Neurophysiol. 49:1347-1363DeBrouwer, S. Edwards, D.H.,Griffith, T.M (1998): Simplification of thequasiperiodic route to chaos in agonist-induced vasomotion by iterative circlemaps.Am J Physiol. 274:H1315-26de Gennes, P-G. (1979) Scaling Concepts in Polymer Physics. Cornell UniversityPress, Ithica, N.Y.Devaney, R.L. (1989): An Introduction to Chaotic Dynamical Systems, 2 nd ed.Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, CA.Dewey, T.G. (1997) Fractals in Molecular Biophysics Oxford University Press,OxfordDing, M., Grebogi, C., Ott, E. (1989) Dimensions of strange nonchaotic attractors.Phys. Lett. A137:167- 172Ding, M., Grebogi, C., Ott, E., Sauer, T., Yorke, J. (1993) Plateau onset forcorrelation dimension: When does it occur. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70:3872-3875.Duke, D.W. and Pritchard, W.S. (eds) (1991)Measuring Chaos in the Human Brain.World Scientific. Singapore.Dvorak, I. and Holden, A. (eds) (1991) Mathematical Approaches to BrainFunctioning Diagnostics. Manchester University Press. ManchesterEbling, W., Jimenez-Montano, M.A. (1980) On grammars, complexity andinformation measures of biological molecules. Math. Biosci 52:53-71258Eckmann, J.-P. (1981): Roads to turbulence in dissipative dynamical systems. Rev.Mod. Phys. 53:643-654Eckmann, J., Ruelle, D. (1985) Ergodic theory of chaos and strange attractors. Rev.Mod. Phys. 57:617-656Eckmann, J.P., Ruelle, D. (1992) Fundamental limitations for estimating dimensionsand Lyapounov exponents in dynamical systems. Physica 56D:185-187Eckmann, J.-P., Kamphorst, S.O., Ruelle, D., Cilberto, S. (1986) Lyapounovexponents from time series. Phys. Rev. A34:4971-4979Edwards, D.H., Griffith, T.M. (1997) Entrained ion transport systems generate themembrane component of chaotic agonist-induced vasomotion. Am J Physiol273:H909-920Efremova, T.M., Kulikov, M.A.(1997) The chaotic component of the high-frequencyEEG of the rabbit cerebral cortex in the formation of a defensive conditioned reflex.Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova 47:858-869Elger,C., Lehnertz, K. (1998) Seizure prediction by non-linear time series analysis ofbrain electrical activity. Eur J Neurosci.10:786-789Enns, R.H., McGuire, G.C. (1997) Nonlinear Physics with Maple for Scientists andEngineers. Birkhauser. BostonEhlers, C.L. (1995) Chaos and complexity. Arch. Gen. Psychiat. 52:960-964Ehlers, C.L., Havstad, J.W., Garfinkel, A., Kupfer, D.J. (1991) Nonlinear analysis ofEEG sleep states. Neuropsychopharmacology 5:167-176259Ehlers, C.L., Havstad, J., Prichard, D., Theiler, J. (1998) Low doses of ethanolreduce evidence for nonlinear structure in brain activity. J Neurosci 18:7474-86Ehlers, C., Havstad, J.W., Schuckit, M.A. (1995) EEG dimension in sons ofalcoholics. Alcohol Clin. Exp Res 19:992-998Elbert, T., Lutzenberger, W., Rockstroh, B., Berg, P., Cohen, R.(1992) Physicalaspects of the EEG in schizophrenics. Biol Psychiatry 32:595-606Erdos, P., Renyi, A. (1970). On a new law of large numbers. J. Anal. Math. 22:103-111Farmer, D., Crutchfield, J., Froehling, H., Packard, N., Shaw, R. (1980) Powerspectra and mixing properties of strange attractors. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 357:453-472Farmer, J.D., Ott, E., Yorke, J.A. (1983) The dimension of chaotic attractors.Physica D7: 153-180Feder, J. (1988) Fractals. Plenum. N.Y.Feigenbaum, M.J. (1979) The universal metric properties of nonlineartransformations, J. Stat. Phys. 21:669-702Fell, J.,Roschke, J., Beckmann, P. (1993) Deterministic chaos and the first positiveLyapunov exponent: a nonlinear analysis of the human electroencephalogramduring sleep. Biol Cybern 69:139-46Fell, J., Roschke, J., Schaffner, C. (1996) Surrogate data analysis of sleepelectroencephalograms reveals evidence for nonlinearity. Biol Cybern 75:85-92260Feller, W. (1968) An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications. Wiley.NY. Vol. I., Chapter 3Fermi, E., Pasta, J., Ulam, S. (1955): Studies of nonlinear problems. Los AlamosScientific Laboratory Report # 1940Fessard, A., Gerard, R.,W. , Konorski, J. (1961) (eds) Brain Mechanisms andLearning. Blackwell, Oxford.Flory, P. (1971) Principles of Polymer Physics. Cornell University Press, Ithica, N.Y.Frank, G.W., Lookman, T., Nerenberg, M.A.H., Essex, C., Lemieux, J., Blume, W.(1990) Chaotic time series of epileptic seizures. Physica D46:427-438Friedrich, R., Fuchs, A., Haken, H. (1991): Spatio-temporal EEG patterns In (ed.H.Haken and H.P. Kopchen) Synergetics of Rhythms. Springer. BerlinGallez, D.,Babloyantz, A. (1991) Predictability of human EEG: a dynamicalapproach. Biol Cybern 64:381-391Ganz,R.E., Faustman, P.M. (1996) Functional coupling between the centralautonomicand the cognitive systems is enhanced in states after optic neuritis andearly multiple sclerosis. Int J Neurosci, 86:87-93Geist, K., Parlitz, U., Lauterborn, W. (1990) Comparison of different methods forcomputing Lyapunov exponents. Prog. Theor. Physics 83:875-893Gershenfeld, N.A. (1992) Dimension measurement on high-dimensional systemsPhysica D55: 135-154261Gerstein, G.L., Mandelbrot, B.B. (1964) Random walk models for the spike activityof a single neuron. Biophys. J. 4:41-68.Gibbs, J.W. (1902) Elementery Principles in Statistical Mechanics, Yale UniversityPress, New Haven.Gilmore, R. (1981): Catastrophe Theory for Scientists and Engineers. Wiley. N.Y.Glass, L., Mackey, M. (1988) From Clocks to Chaos; The Rhythms of Life.Princeton University Press. Princeton.Goldberger, A.L., Rigney, D.R., West, B.J. (1990) Chaos and fractals in humanphysiology. Scientific American 262:42-49Goldberger, A.L. (1996) Non-linear dynamics for clinicians: chaos theory, fractalsand complexity at the bedside. Lancet 347:1312-1314Gong, Y., Xu, J., Ren, W., Hu, S., Wang, F.(1998) Determining the degree of chaosfrom analysis of ISI time series in the nervous system: a comparison betweencorrelation dimension and nonlinear forecasting methods. Biol Cybern 78:159-65Gottschalk, A., Bauer, M.S., Whybrow, P.C. (1995) Evidence of chaotic moodvariation in bipolar disorder. Arch. Gen. Psychiat. 52:947-959Grebogi, C., Ott, E., Pellikan, S., Yorke, J.A. (1984) Strange attractors that are notchaotic. Physica 13D:261-268Grassberger, P. (1981) On the Hausdorf dimension of fractal attractors. J. Stat.Phys. 26:173-179262Grassberger, P. (1983) Generalized dimensions of strange attractors. Phys. Lett.A97:227-230.Grassberger, P, Procaccia, I. (1983) Measuring the strangeness of strangeattractors. Physica 9D:189-208Gregson, R.A.,Britton, L.A., Campbell, E.A., Gates, G.R. (1990) Comparisons of thenonlinear dynamics of electroencephalograms under various task loadingconditions: a preliminary report. Biol Psychol 31:173-191Grimmett, G. (1989) Percolation. Springer-Verlag.Guckenheimer, J., Holmes, P. (1983): Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systemsand Bifurcations of Vector Fields. Springer. N.Y.Guillemin, R.C., Brazeau, P., Briskin, A., Mandell, A.J. (1983) Evidence forsynergetic dynamics in a mammalian pituitary cell perfusion system in (ed. E.Basar,H. Flohr, H. Haken, A.J. Mandell) Synergetics of Brain. Springer-Verlag. pp 155-162Gupta, V., Suryanarayanan, S., Reddy, N.P. (1997) Fractal analysis of surface EMGsignals from the biceps. Int J Med Inf 45:185-192Guzzetti, S.,Signorini,M.G., Cogliati, C., Messetti,S., Porta, A., Cerutti, S., Malliani,A. (1996) Non-linear dynamics and chaotic indices in heart rate variability of normalsubjects and heart-transplanted patients. Cardiovasc Res 31:441-446Hadamard, J. (1898) Les surfaces a courbures opposees et leur lignes geodesic. J.Math. Pures. Appl. 4:27-73263Hagerman, I.,Berglund, M., Lorin, M., Nowak, J., Sylven, C.(1996) Chaos-relateddeterministic regulation of heart rate variability in time- and frequency domains:effects of autonomic blockade and exercise. Cardiovasc 31:410-418Haken, H. (1997) Visions of synergetics. Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos. 7:1927-1951Halsey, T.C., Jensen, M.H., Kadanoff, L.P., Procacccia, I., Shraiman, B.I. (1986)Fractal measures and their singularities: the generalization of strange sets. Phys.Rev A33:1141-1151Hartman, M., Pincus, S., Johnson, M., Matthews, D., Faunt, L., Vance, M., Thorner,M., Veldhuis, J. (1994): Enhanced basal and disorderly growth hormone secretiondistinguish acromegalic from normal pulsatile growth hormone release. J. Clin.Invest. 94:1277-1288.Hausdorff, J.M., Cudkowicz, M.E., Firtion, R., Wei, J.Y., Goldberger, A.L. (1998)Gait variability and basal gangia disorders: stride-to-stride variations in gait cycletiming in Parkinson’s and Huntington’s disease. Mov. Disord. 13:428-437Hausdorff, J.M., Peng, C.-K., Ladin, Z., Wei, J.Y., Goldberger, A.L. (1995) Iswalking a random walk? Evidence for long range correlations in the stride interval ofhuman gait. J. Appl. Physiol. 78:349-358Hausdorff. J.M., Purdon, P.L., Peng, C.-K., Ladin, Z., Wei, J.Y., Goldberger, A.L.(1996) Fractal dynamics of human gait stability of long-range correlations in strideinterval fluctuations. J. Appl. Physiol. 80:1448-1457Heffernan, M.S.(1996) Comparative effects of microcurrent stimulation on EEGspectrum and correlation dimension. Integr Physiol Behav Sci 31:202-209264Hentschel, H.G.E., Procaccia, I. (1983) The infinite number of generalizeddimensions of fractals and strange attractors. Physica D8:435-444Herman, M.L., Pincus, S.M., Johnson, M.L.,Matthews, D.L.., Faunt, , L.M.., Vance,M.L.., Thorner, M.O., Veldhuis, J.D. (1994) Enhanced basal and disorderly growthhormone secretion distinguish acromegalic from normal pulsatile growth hormonerelease. J. Clin. Invest. 94:1277-1288.Hitzemann, R., Murphy, M., Curell, J. (1985) Opiate receptor thermodynamics:agonist and antogonist binding. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 108:171-177Hoyer, D.,Pompe, B., Herzel, H., Zwiener, U. (1998) Nonlinear coordination ofcardiovascular autonomic control. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 17:17-21Huber, M.T., Braun, H.A., Krief, J.C. (1999) Effects of noise on different states ofrecurrent affective disorder. Biol. Psychiat. In press.Huberman, B.A. (1987) A model for dysfunctions in smooth pursuit eye movement.Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 504:260-273Hughes, B.D. (1995) Random Walks and Random Environments. Clarendon.Oxford.Hurewicz, W., Wallman, H. (1948) Dimension Theory. Princeton University Press,PrincetonIasemidis, L.D., Sackellares, J.C. (1996) Chaos theory and epilepsy TheNeuroscientist. 2:118-128.Iasemidis, J., Sacklellares, H., Zaveri,H., Williams, W.J. (1990): Phase spacetopolography and the Laypounov exponent of electrocorticograms in partialseizures. Brain Topolography 2:187-201.265Iasemidis, LD., Sveri, H.P. Sackellares, J.C., William, W.J., Hood, T.W. (1988)Nonlinear dynamics of electrocorticographic data. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 5:339Inouye, T., Shinosaki, K., Sakamoto, H., Toi, S., Ukai, S., Iyama, A., Katsuda, Y.,Hirano, M. (1991) Quantification of EEG irregularity by use of the entropy of thepower spectrum. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 79:204-210Inouye, T., Shinosaki, K., Toi, S., Ukai, S., Iyama, A., Katsuda, Y., Hirano, M. (1992)Abnormality of background EEG determined by the entropy of power spectra inepileptic patients. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 82:203-207Jansen, B.H. (1996) Nonlinear dynamics and quantitative EEG analysis.Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl 45:39-56Jansen, B.H. and Brandt, M.E. (eds) 1993 Nonlinear Dynamical Analysis of theEEG. World Scientific. SingaporeJeong, J., Joung, M.K., Kim, S.Y. (1998) Quantification of emotion by nonlinearanalysis of the chaotic dynamics of electroencephalograms during perception of 1/fmusic. Biol Cybern 78:217-25Jeong,J., Kim, S.Y., Han, S.H. (1998) Non-linear dynamical analysis of the EEG inAlzheimer's disease with optimal embedding dimension. Electroencephalogr ClinNeurophysiol 106:220-228Kaneko, K. (1983): Similarity structure and scaling property of the period addingphenomena. Prog. Theor. Phys. 69:403-414Kaplan, D.T. (1994) Exceptional events as evidence of determinism. PhysicaD73:38-48266Kaplan, D.T., Glass, L. (1992) Direct test for determinism in a time series. Phys.Rev. Lett. 68:427-430Katz, B. (1966) Nerve, Muscle and Synapse. McGraw-Hill. N.Y.Kelly,O.E., Johnson, D.H., Delgutte, B., Cariani, P. (1996)Fractal noise strength inauditory-nerve fiber recordings. J Acoust Soc Am 99:2210-20Keunen, R.W.,Vliegen, J.H., Stam,C.J., Tavy, D.L.(1996) Nonlinear transcranialDoppler analysis demonstrates age-related changes of cerebral hemodynamics.Ultrasound Med Biol 22:383-390Khinchin, A.I. (1957) Mathematical Foundations of Information Theory. Dover. N.Y.King, R., Barchus, J.D., Huberman, B.A. (1984) Chaotic behavior in dopamineneurodynamics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 81:1244-1247Klafter, J., Shlesinger, M.F., Zumofen, G. (1996) Beyond brownian motion. PhysicsToday Feb. pp 33-39Klemm, W.R. (1990) Historical and introductory perspectives on brain-stemmediated behaviors In (ed. Klemm, W.R., Vertes, R.P.) Wiley-Interscience, N.Y.Klemm, W.R., Sherry, C.J. (1981) Serial ordering in spike trains: what's it "trying totell us"? Int J Neurosci 14:15-33Knapp, S., Mandell, A.J. (1983) Scattering kinetics in a complex tryptophanhydroxylase preparation from rat brainstem raphe nuclei: statistical evidence that267the lithium-induced sigmoid velocity function reflects two states of available catalyticpotential. J. Neural Trans. 58:169-182Knapp, S., Mandell, A.J. (1984) TRH influences the pterin-cofactor and timedependentinstabilities of rate raphe trypophan hydroxylase activity assessed underfar-from-equilibrium conditions. Neurochem. Internat. 6:801-812Knapp, S., Mandell, A.J., Russo, P.V., Vitto, A., Stewart, K. (1981) Straindifferences in kinetic and themal stability of two mouse strain tryptophanhydroxylase activities. Brain Res. 230:317-336Koch, C.D.,Palovcik, R.A., Uthman, B.M., Principe, J.C. (1992) Chaotic activityduring iron-induced "epileptiform" discharge in rat hippocampal slices. IEEE TransBiomed Eng 39:1152-1160Koch,H.P, Zajcek, H. (1991) Fractals also in pharmacokinetics? Pharmazie 46:870-871Kolmogorov, A.N. (1950) Foundations of Probability Theory. Chelsea, N.Y.Kolmogorov, A.N. (1957): General theory of dynamical systems and classicalmechanics. In Proc. 1954 International Congress of Mathematics, North-Holland.Kolmogorov, A.N. (1958) A new metric invariant of transient dynamical systems andautomorphisms in Lebesgue space. Dokl. Acad. Nauk. SSSR 119:861-864Kolmogorov, A.N. (1959) Entropy per unit time as a metric invariant ofautomorphisms. Dokl. Acad. Nauk. SSSR 124:754-758268Korn, S.J., Horn, R. (1988) Statistical discrimination of fractal and Markov models ofsingle-channel gating. Biophys J. 54:871-877Korsch, H.J., Jodl, H. (1993) Chaos; A Program Collection for the PC. Springer-Verlag.Krebs-Thomson, K., Lehmann-Masten, V., Naiem, S., Paulus, M.P., Geyer, M.A.(1998a) Modulation of phencyclidine-induced changes in locomotor activity andpatterns in rats by serotonin. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 343:135-143Krebs-Thomson, K., Paulus, M.P., Geyer, M.A. (1998b) Effects of hallucinogens onlocomotor and investigatory activity and patterns: influence of 5-HT2A and 5-HT2Creceptors. Neuropsychophamracology. 18:339-351Kowalik, Z.J., Elbert, T. (1995) A practical method for the measurement of thechaoticity of electric and magnetic brain activity. Int. J. Bifurcation. Chaos 5:475-490Kumar, A.R., Johnson, D.H. (1993) Analyzing and modeling fractal intensity pointprocesses. J Acoust Soc Am 93:3365-3373Krystal, A.D., Weiner, R.D. (1991) The largest Lypounov exponent of the EEG inECT seizures. In (ed. D.Duke and W. Pritchard) Measureing Chaos in the HumanBrain. World Scientific. SingaporeLasota, A., Yorke, J. (1973) On the existence of invariant measures for piecewisemonotonic transformations. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 186:481-488Lathrop, D.P., Kostelich, E.J. (1989) Characterization of an experimental strangeattractor by periodic orbirts. Phys. Rev. A40:4028-4031269Levinson, N. (1949): A second order differential equation with singular solutions..Ann. Math. 50:127-153Li, T.Y., Yorke, J.A. (1975): Period three implies chaos. Amer. Math. Mon. 82:985-992Liebovitch, L.S. (1989) Analysis of fractal ion channel gating kinetics: kinetic rates,energy levels, and activation energies. Math Biosci. 93:97-115Liebovitch, L.S. (1998) Fractals and Chaos; Simplified for the Life Sciences. OxfordUniversity Press, Oxford.Liebovitch,L.S., Sullivan, J.M. (1987) Fractal analysis of a voltage-dependentpotassium channel from cultured mouse hippocampal neurons. Biophys J. 52:979-88Liebovitch, L.S., Todorov, A.T. Using fractals and nonlinear dynamics to determinethe physical properties of ion channel proteins. (1996) Crit Rev Neurobiol 10:169-87Liebovitch, L.S., Todorov, A.T. (1996) Invited editorial. J. Appl. Physiol. 80:1446-1447Liebert, W., Pawelzik, K., Schuster, H.G. (1991) Optimal embeddings of chaoticattractors from topological considerations. Europhys. Lett. 14:521-526Lorenz, E.N. (1963): Deterministic nonperiodic flow. J. Atmos. Sci. 20:130-141Lowen, S.B.,Teich, M.C.(1992) Auditory-nerve action potentials form a nonrenewalpoint process over short as well as long time scales. J Acoust Soc Am 92:803-6270Lutzenberger, W., Flor, H., Birbaumer, N. (1997) Enhanced dimensional complexityof the EEG during memory for personal pain in chronic pain patients. Neurosci Lett226:167-170Lutzenberger, W., Birbaumer,N., Flor, H., Rockstroh, B., Elbert, T. (1992)Dimensional analysis of the human EEG and intelligence Neurosci Lett 143:10-14Macheras, P.,Argyrakis, P., Polymilis, C. (1996) Fractal geometry, fractal kineticsand chaos en route to biopharmaceutical sciences. Eur J Drug MetabPharmacokinet 21:77-86Mackey, M. (1992) Time’s Arrow: The Origins of Thermodynamic Behavior.Springer-Verlag. NYMackey, M., Glass, L. (1977) Oscillation and chaos in physiological control systems.Science 197:287-289Magoun, H.W. (1954) The ascending reticular formation and wakefulness. In (ed.E.D. Adrian, F. Bremer, H.H. Jasper. Brain Mechanisms and Consciousness.Blackwell. Oxford pp 1-20Makarenko, V., Llinas, R.(1998) Experimentally determined chaotic phasesynchronization in a neuronal system. Proc Natl Acad Sci 95:15747-15752Mandelbrot, B.B. (1967) How long is the coast of Britain? Statistical self-similarityand fractional dimension. Science 155:636-638Mandelbrot, B.B. (1974) Intermittent turbulence in self-similar cascades: divergenceof high moments and dimension of the carrier. J. Fluid Mech. 62:331-358271Mandelbrot, B.B. (1975) Les Objets Fractals:Forme, Hasard et Dimension.Flammarion. ParisMandelbrot, B.B. (1977) Fractals; Form, Chance and Dimension. Freeman. N.Y.Mandelbrot, B.B. (1977) Fractals: Form, Chance and Dimension, Freeman. SanFranciscoMandell, A.J. (1983) From intermittency to transitivity in neuropsychobiologicalflows. Am. J. Physiol. 245: R484-R494Mandell, A.J. (1984) Non-equilibrium behavior of some brain enzyme and receptorsystems. Ann. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 24:237-274Mandell, A.J. (1986) The hyperbolic helix hypothesis in (ed. L Pietronero, E. Tosatti)Fractals in Physics. Elsevier. N.Y.Mandell, A.J. (1987) Dynamical complexity and pathological order in the cardiacmonitoring problem. Physica D27:235-242Mandell, A.J., Kelso, J.A.S. (1991) Dissipative and statistical mechanics of amineneuron activity. In (eds. Ellison, J.A., Uberall, H.) Essays on Classical and QuantumDynamics. Gordon Beach. Philadelphia pp 203-236Mandell, A.J., Knapp, S., Ehlers, C., Russo, P.V. (1985) The stability of constrainedrandomness: lithium prophylaxis at several neurobiological levels. In (ed. R.M. Post,J. Ballenger). Neurobiology of Mood Disorders. Williams and Wilkins. Baltimore.pp744-776272Mandell, A.J., Russo, P.V. (1981): Striatal tyrosine hydroxylase:multipleconformational kinetic oscillators and product concentration frequencies. J.Neuroscience 1:380-389Mandell, A.J., Russo, P.V., Knapp, S. (1982) Strange stability in hierarchicallycoupled neuropsychobiological systems. In (ed. Haken, H.) Evolution of Order andChaos. Springer-Verlag. Berlin. pp 270-286Mandell, A.J., Selz, K.A. (1991) Period adding, hierarchical protein modes andelectroencephalographically defined states of consciousness. In (eds. Vohra, S.,Spano, M., Shlesinger, M.F., Pecora, L., Ditto, W. ) Proc. 1 st Experimental ChaosConference. World Scientific. Hong KongMandell, A.J., Selz, K.A. (1992) Dynamical systems in psychiatry: now what? Biol.Psychiat. 32:299-301.Mandell, A.J., Selz, K.A. (1993): Brain stem neuronal noise and neocortical“resonance.” J. Stat. Phys. 70:355-371Mandell, A.J., Selz, K.A. (1994) Resonance, synchroniation and lexical redundancyin the expanding dynamics of brain stem neurons. SPIE Proc 2036:86-99Mandell, A.J. and Selz, K.A. (1994) Resonance, synchronization and lexicalredundancy in the expanding dynamics of brain stem neurons. Chaos in Medicineand Biology SPIE Proc: 2036:86-99Mandell, A.J., Selz, K.A. (1995) Nonlinear dynamical patterns as personality theoryfor neurobiology and psychiatry. Psychiatry 58:371-390273Mandell, A.J., Selz, K.A. (1997a) Entropy conservation as hneurobiological dynamical systems. Chaos 7:67-81≈ + d int µλ µ µMandell, A.J. and Selz, K.A. (1997b) Is the EEG a strange attractor? Brainstemneuronal discharge patterns and electroencehphalographic rhytms in (ed. Grebogi,C., Yorke, J) The Impact of Chaos on Science and Society United NationsUniversity Press, Tokyo, pp 64-96Mandell, A.J., Selz, K.A., Shlesinger, M.F. (1991) Some comments on the weavingof contemporaneous minds: Resonant neuronal quasiperiodicity, period adding andO(2) symmetry in the EEG In (ed. Pritchard W., Duke, D.) Chaos in the Brain WorldScientific Singapore pp 136-155Manneville, P., Pomeau, Y. (1980): Different ways to turbulence in dissipativesystems. Physica 1D:219-226Mantegna, R.N. (1991) Levy walks and enhanced diffusion in Milan stock exchange.Physica A 179:232-242Martinerie, J.,Adam, C., Le Van Quyen, M., Baulac, M., Clemenceau, S., Renault,B., Varela, F.J. (1998) Epileptic seizures can be anticipated by non-linear analysisNat Med 4:1173-1176May, R.M. (1976): Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamics.Nature 261:459-467Mayer-Kress, G. (1986) Dimensions and Entropies in Chaotic Systems. Springer-Verlag. N.Y.274McManus, O.B., Weiss, D.S., Blatz, A.L., Magleby, K.L. (1988) Fractal models areinadequate for the kinetics of four different ion channels. Biophys J 54:859-70McMullen, C. T. (1994) Complex Dynamics and Renormalization. PrincetonUniversity Press. Princeton.McMurran, S., Tattersal, J. (1999): Mary Cartwright. Notices, AMS 46:214-220Mestivier, D., Dabire, H., Safar, M., Chau, N.P. (1998) Use of nonlinear methods toassess effects of clonidine on blood pressure in spontaneously hypertensive rats. JAppl Physiol 84:1795-800Metropolis, N., Stein, M.L., Stein, P.R. (1973): On limit sets for transfomrations onthe unit interval . J. Combinatorial Theory 15:25-44Meyer-Lindenberg, A., Bauer, U., Krieger, S., Lis, S., Vehmeyer, K., Schuler, G.,Gallhofer, B. (1998) The topography of non-linear cortical dynamics at rest, inmental calculation and moving shape perception. Brain Topogr 10:291-9Micheloyannis, S., Flitzanis, N., Papanikolaou, E., Bourkas, M., Terzakis, D.,Arvanitis, S., Stam, C.J. (1998) Usefulness of non-linear EEG analysis Acta NeurolScand 97:13-9Milnor, J. (1985): On the concept of attractor. Commun. Math. Phys. 99:177-195Milton, J.G., Longtin, A. (1990): Evaluation of pupil constriction and dilation fromcycling measurements. Vision Res. 30:515-525275Misiurewicz, M. (1995) Thirty years after Sharkovskii’s theorem. Int. J. BifurcationChaos 5:1275-1281Mogilevskii, A.Ya., Derzhiruk, L.P., Panchekha, A.P., Dershiruk, E.A.(1998)Adaptive regulation of the nonlinear dynamics of electrical activity of the brain.Neurosci Behav Physiol 28:366-375Molnar, M., Gacs,G., Ujvari, G., Skinner, J.E., Karmos, G. (1997) Dimensionalcomplexity of the EEG in subcortical stroke--a case study. Int J Psychophysiol.25:193-199Montroll, E.W., Badger, W.W. (1974) Introduction to Quantitative Aspects of SocialPhenomena. Gordon & Breach. N.Y.Montroll, E.W., Shlesinger, M.F. (1984) On the wonderful world of random walks. In(ed. Liebowitz, J.L, Montroll, E.W.) Nonequilibrium Phenomena II: From Stohasticsto Hydrodynamics. Elsevier. North-Holland. AmsterdamMoon, F. (1992): Chaotic and Fractal Dynamics; An Introduction for AppliedScientists and Engineers. Second Edition, Wiley, N.Y.Morinushi, T., Kawasaki, H., Masumoto, Y., Shigeta, K., Ogura, T., Takigawa, M.Examination of the diagnostic value and estimation of the chaos phenomenon inmasticatory movement using fractal dimension in patients with temporomandibulardysfunction syndrome. (1998): J. Oral Rehabil.25:386-94Morse, M. (1921) A one-to-one representation of geodesics on a surface of negativecurvature. Amer. J. Math. 43:33-51Morse, M. Hedlund, G.A. (1938) Symbolic dynamics. Amer. J. Math. 60:815-866.276Moruzzi, G. (1960) Synchronizing influences of the brain stem and the inhibitorymechanisms underlying the production of sleep by sensory stimulation.Electroencephal. Clin. Neurophysiol. Suppl. 13:231-256Moruzzi, G., Magoun, R.W. (1949) Brain stem reticular formation and activation ofthe EEG. Electroencephal. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1:455-473Musha, T. (1981) 1/f fluctuations in biological systems. In Sixth InternationalConference on Noise in Physical Systems. National Bureau of Standards #614 :143-146Nicolelis, M.A.L., Baccala, L.A., Lin, R.C.S., Chapin, J.K. (1995): Sensorimotorencoding by synchronous neural ensemble activity at multiple levels of thesomatosensory system. Science 268:1353-1358Nicolis, J.S. (1986) Chaotic dynamics applied to information processing. Rep. Prog.Phys. 49:1109-1196Nieminen, H., Takala, E.P.(1996) Evidence of deterministic chaos in the myoelectricsignal. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 36:49-58Nozaki,D., Nakazawa, K., Yamamoto, Y.(1996) Supraspinal effects on the fractalcorrelation in human H-reflex. Exp Brain Res 112:112-118Nusse, H.E., Yorke, J.A. (1991). Dynamics: Numerical Explorations. Springer-Verlag. N.Y.277Ogihara,T., Tamai, I., Tsuji, A. (1998) Application of fractal kinetics for carriermediatedtransport of drugs across intestinal epithelial membrane. Pharm Res15:620-625Olsen, L.F., Degn, H. (1977): Chaos in an enzymel system. Nature 267:177-178Ornstein, D.S. (1989) Ergodic theory, randomness and chaos. Science 243:182-198.Ott, E. (1981): Strange attractors and chaotic motions of dynamical systems. Rev.Mod. Phys. 53:655-671Ott, E., Sauer, T., Yorke, J.A. (1994) Coping with Chaos. Wiley-Interscience. N.Y.Packard, N., Crutchfield, J., Farmer, D., Shaw, R. (1980) Geometry from a timeseries. Phys. Rev. Lett. 45:712-716Parker, T.S., Chua, L.O. (1989) Practical Numerical Algorithms for ChaoticSystems. Springer-Verlag. N.Y.Parlitz, U. (1992) Identification of true and spurious Lyapounov exponents from timeseries. Int. J. Bifurcation and Chaos 2:155-165Parry, W. (1964) Intrinsic Markoff chains . Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 112:55-66Paulus, M.P., Bakshi, V.P., Geyer, M.A. (1998) Isolation rearing affects sequentialorganization of motor behavior in post-pubertal but not pre-pubertal Lister andSprague-Dawley rats. Behavior Brain Res. 94:271-280278Paulus, M.P., Gass, S.F., Mandell, A.J. (1989): A realistic , minimal “middle layer”for neural networks. Physica D40:135-155Paulus, M.P., Geyer, M.A. (1992) The effects of MDMA and other methylenedioxysubstitutedphenylalkylamines on the structure of rat locomotor activity.Neuropsychopharmacology 7:15-31Paulus, M.P, Geyer,M.A., Braff, D.L. (1994) The assessesment of sequentialresponse organization in schizophrenic and control subjects. Prog.Neuropsychopharm. & Biol. Psychiat. 18:1169-1185Paulus, M.P., Geyer, M.A., Braff, D.L. (1996): The use of methods from chaostheory to quantify a fundamental dysfunction in the behavioral organization ofschizophrenic patients. Am. J. Psychiat. 153:714-717Paulus, M.P., Geyer, M.A., Gold, L.H., Mandell, A.J. (1990) Application of entropymeasures derived from the ergodic theory of dynamical systems to rat locomotorbehavior. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 87:723-727Paulus, M.P., Geyer, M.A., Mandell, A.J. (1991) Statistical mechanics of aneurobiological dynamical system: The spectrum of local entropies, s(α) applied tococaine-perturbed behavior. Physica A174:567-577Pei, X., Moss, F. (1996) Characterization of low-dimensional dynamics in thecrayfish caudal photoreceptor. Nature 379:618-621Peng, C.-K., Buldyrev, S.V., Goldberger, A.L., Havlin, S., Simons, M., Stanley, H.E.(1993) Finite size effects on long range correlations: implications for analyzing DNAsequences. Phys. Rev. E47:3730-3733279Peng, C.-K., Havlin, S., Stanley, H.E., Goldberger, A.L. (1995) Quantification ofscaling exponents and crossover phenomena in nonstationary heartbeat timeseries. Chaos 6:82-87Perkel, D.H., Gerstein, G.L., Moore, G.P. (1967) Neuronal spike trains andstochastic point processes. Biophys. J. 7:419-440Pezard, L., Martinerie, J., Varela, F.J., Bouchet, F., Guez, D., Derouesne, C.,Renault, B. (1998) Entropy maps characterize drug effects on brain dynamics inAlzheimer's disease Neurosci Lett 253:5-8Pezard, L., Nandrino, J.L., Renault, B., Massioui, F.E., Allilaire, F., Muller, J. (1996)Depression as a dynamic disease. Biol. Psychiat. 39:991-999Pijn, J., Velis, D., van der Heyden, M., DeGoede, J., van Veelen, C.W., Lopes daSilva, F. (1997): Nonlinear dynamics of epileptic seizures on basis of intracranialEEG recordings. Brain Topogr. 9:249-70Pincus, S.M. (1991) Approximate entropy as a measure of a system’s complexity.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 88:2297-2301Pincus, S.M., Gladstone, I.M., Ehrenkranz, R.A. (1991) A regularity statistic formedical data analysis. J Clin Monit 7:335-245Pincus, S.M.,Minkin, M.J. (1998) Assessing sequential irregularity of both endocrineand heart rate rhythms. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 10:281-291Popivanov, D., Mineva, A., Dushanova, J. (1998) Tracking EEG signal dynamicsduring mental tasks. A combined linear/nonlinear approach. IEEE Eng Med Biol17:89-95280Porta, A., Baselli, G., Montano, N., Gnecchi-Ruscone, T., Lombardi, F., Malliani, A.,Cerutti, S. (1996): Classification of coupling patterns among spontaneous rhythmsand ventilation in the sympathetic discharge of decerebrate cats. Biol Cybern.75:163-172Pradhan, N. Sadasivan, P.K. (1996) The nature of dominant Lyapunov exponentand attractor dimension curves of EEG in sleep. Comput Biol Med 26:419-428Press, W.H., Flannery, B.P., Teukolsky, S.A., Vetterling, W.T. (1991) NumericalRecipies; The Art of Scientific Computing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Pritchard, W.S. (1992) The brain in fractal time: 1/f-like power spectrum scaling ofthe human electroencephalogram. Int J Neurosci 66:119-129Pritchard, W.S., Krieble, K.K., Duke, D.W. (1996) Application of dimensionestimation and surrogate data to the time evolution of EEG topographic variables.Int. J. Psychophysiol. 24:189-195Rapp, P. E. (1993) Chaos in the neurosciences: Cautionary tales from the frontier.The Biologist (London) 40:89-94.Rapp, P.E. (1994) A guide to dynamical analysis. Integrat. Physiol. Behavioral. Sci.29:311-327Rapp, P.E. (1995) Is there evidence for chaos in the human central nervous system.In (ed. R. Robertson and A. Combs) Chaos Theory in Psychology and the LifeSciences. Larence Erlbaum. Mahway, N.J. pp 89-100Rapp, P. E., Bashore, T.R., Martinerie, J.M., Albano, A.M., Mees, A.I. (1989)Dynamics of brain electrical activity. Brain Topolography 2:99-118281Rapp, P.E., Goldberg, G., Albano, A.M., Janicki, M.B., Nurphy, D., Niemeyer, E.,Jimenez-Montano, M.A. (1993) Using coarse-grained measures to characterizeelectromyographic signals. Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos. 3:525-542.Rapp, P.E., Jimenez-Montano, M.A., Langs, R.J., Thomson, L. (1991) Quantitativecharacteristization of patient-therapist communication. Math. Biosci. 105:207-227Rapp, P.E., Schmah, T. (1996) Complexity measures in molecular psychiatry.1:408-416Rapp, P.E., Zimmerman, I.D., Vining, E.P., Cohen, N., Albano, A.M., Jimenez-Montano, M.A. (1994) The algorithmic complexity of neural spike trains increasesduring focal seizures. J. Neurosci. 14:4731-4739Ren, W., Hu. S.J., Zhang, B.J., Wang, F.Z. (1997): Period-adding bifurcation withchaos in the interspike intervals generated by an experimental neural pacemaker.Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos 7:1867-1872Renyi, A. (1970) Probability Theory. North-Holland. AmsterdamRinzel, J. (1985) Excitation dynamics: insights from simplified membrane models.Fed. Proc. 44:2944-2946Rissanen, J. (1982) Estimation of structure by minimum desciption length. CircuitSystems Signal Processing 1:395-396Roelfsema, F., Pincus, S.M., Veldhuis, J.D. Patients with Cushing's disease secreteadrenocorticotropin and cortisol jointly more asynchronously than healthy subjects.J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:688-692282Romeiras, F.J., Bondeson, A., Ott, E., Antonsen, T.M., Grebogi, C. (19987)Quasioperiodically forced dyanmical systems with strange, nonchaotic attractors.Physica 26D:277-294.Roschke, J. (1992) Strange attractors, chaotic behavior and informational aspectsof sleep EEG data. Neuropsychobiology 25:172-176Roschke, J., Aldenhoff, J.B.(1992) A nonlinear approach to brain function:deterministic chaos and sleep EEG. Sleep 15:95-101Roschke, J., Aldenhoff, J.B. (1993) Estimation of the dimensionality of sleep-EEGdata in schizophrenics Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 242:191-196Roschke, J., Fell, J., Mann, K. (1997) Non-linear dynamics of alpha and thetarhythm: correlation dimensions and Lyapunov exponents from healthy subject'sspontaneous EEG Int J Psychophysiol 26:251-61Rössler, O. (1976): An equation for continuous chaos. Phys. Lett. A57:397-398Rössler, O.E. (1979) An equation for hyperchaos. Phys. Lett. 71A:155-157Ruelle, D. (1978) What are measures describing turbulence. Prog. Theor. Phys.Supp. 64:339-345Ruelle, D.(1979) Ergodic theory of differentiable dynamical systmes. Publ. Math.IHES 50:27-58Ruelle, D. (1987) Chaotic Evolution and Strange Attractors. Cambridge UniversityPress. Cambridge283Ruelle, D. (1990) Deterministic chaos: The science and fiction. Proc. Roy. Soc.Lond. 427A:241-248.Ruelle, D., Takens, F. (1971): On the nature of turbulence. Commun. Math. Phys.20:167-192; 23:343-344Russo, P.V., Mandell, A.J. (1984a) A kinetic scattering approach to the nonlinearinstabilities of rat brain tyrosine hydroxylase preparations at several levels oftetrahydrobiopterin cofactor demonstrates evolutionary behavior characteristic ofglobal dynamical systems. Brain Res. 299:313-322Russo, P.V., Mandell, A.J. (1984b) Metrics from nonlinear dynamics adapted forcharacterizing the behavior of non-equilibrium enzymatic rate functions. Anal.Biochem. 139:91-99Russo, P.V., Mandell, A.J. (1986) Sonication, calcium and peptides havesystermatic effects on the nonlinear dynamics of tyrosine hydroxylase activity.Neurochem. Int. 9:171-176Sadana,A.,(1998) Analyte-receptor binding kinetics for biosensor applications. Ananalysis of the influence of the fractal dimension on the binding rate coefficient. ApplBiochem Biotechnol 73:89-112Saltzman, B. (1962): Finite amplitude free convection as an initial value problem. J.Atmos. Sci. 19:329-341Sammer, G.(1996) Working-memory load and dimensional complexity of the EEG.Int J Psychophysiol 24:173-182284Sammon, M.P., Bruce, E.H. (1991) Vagal afferent activity increases dynamicaldimension of respiration in rats. J Appl Physiol 70:1748-1762Sano, M., Sawada, Y. (1985) Measurement of the Lyapounov spectrum fromchaotic time series. Phys. Rev. Lett. 55:1082-1085Sansom, M.S., Ball, F.G., Kerry, C.J., McGee, R., Ramsey, R.L., Usherwood, P.N.(1989) Markov, fractal, diffusion and related models of ion channel gating. Acomparison with experimental data from two ion channels. Biophys J 56:1229-43Sato, S., Sano, M., Sawada, Y. (1987) Practical methods of meaureing thegeneralized dimension and largest Lyapounov exponent in high dimensional chaoticsystems. Prog. Theor. Phys. 77:1-5Sauer, T., Yorke, J.A., Casdagli, M. (1991) Embedology. J. Stat. Phys. 65:579-616Schiff, S.J., So, P., Chang, T., Burke, R.E., Sauer, T. (1997): Detecting generalizedsynchrony through mutual prediction in a spinal neural ensemble. PreprintSchierwagen, A.K. (1990) Growth, structure and dynamics of real neurons: modelstudies and experimental results Biomed Biochim Acta 49:709-722Schmeisser, E.T.(1993) Fractal analysis of steady-state-flicker visual evokedpotentials: feasibility. J Opt Soc Am 10:1637-1641Schuster, H.G. (1989): Deterministic Chaos. Second Edition, VCH, Weinheim,Germany.Scott, A. (1990) The solitary wave: An enduring pulse first seen in water mayconvey energy in the cell. Science 30:28-35285Segundo, J.P., Sugihara, G., Dixon, P., Stiber, M.,Bersier, L.F.(1998) The spiketrains of inhibited pacemaker neurons seen through the magnifying glass ofnonlinear analyses. Neuroscience 87:741-66Selz, K.A. (1992) Mixing Properties in Human Behavioral Style and TimeDependencies in Behavior Identification; The Modeling of a Universal DynamicalLaw. Doctoral Disseration. UMI. N.Y.Selz, K.A., Mandell, A.J. (1991) Bernoulli partition-equivalence of intermittentneuronal discharge patterns. Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos 1:717-722.Selz, K.A., Mandell, A.J. (1992) Critical coherence and characteristic times in brainstem neuronal discharge patterns. In (ed. T. McKenna, J. Davis, S.F. Zornetzer)Single Neuron Computation, Academic. N.Y. pp 525-560.Selz, K.A., Mandell, A.J. (1993): Style as mechanism: from man to a map of theinterval and back. In (ed. W. Ditto) Chaos in Medicine and Biology, Proc. SPIE2036:174-182Selz, K.A., Mandell, A.J. (1997) The power of style: differential operator scaling inthe lexical compression of sequences generated by psychological, content-freecomputer tasks. Complexity 2:50-55Selz, K.A., Mandell, A.J., Anderson, C.A., Smotherman, W., Teicher, M. (1995)Distribution of local Mandelbrot-Hurst exponents: motor activity in cocaine treatedfetal rats and manic depressive patients. Fractals 3:893-904Seneta, E. (1981) Non-negative Matrices and Markoff Chains. Springer-Verlag, NewYork.286Shannon, C.D., Weaver, W. (1949) The Mathematical Theory of Communication.University of Illinois Press, UrbanaSharkovskii, A.N. (1964): Coexistence of the cycles of a continuous mapping of theline to itself. Ukranian Mat. Z. 16:61-71Shaw, R. (1981): Strange attractors, chaotic behavior and information flow. Z.Naturfursch. 36a:80-112Shenker, S.J., Kadanoff, L.P. (1982): Critical behavior of a KAM surface. J. Stat.Phys. 27:631-645Shlesinger, M.F. (1988) Fractal time in condensed matter. Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem.39:269-290Shlesinger, M.F. (1996) Random Processes. Encyclopedia of Applied Physics.16:45-70Shlesinger, M.F., Klafter, J., Wong, Y.M. (1982) Random walks with infinite spatialand temporal moments. J. Stat. Phys. 27:499-512Shlesinger, M.F., Zaslavsky, G.M. (1996) Strange kinetics. Physics Today. Feb. pg.33-39.Shlesinger, M.F., Zaslavsky, G.M., Frisch, U. (1995) Levy Flights and RelatedTopics in Physics. Springer-Verlag287Silipo, R., Deco, G., Vergassola, R., Bartsch, H.(1998)Dynamics extraction inmultivariate biomedical time series. Biol Cybern 79:15-27Simoyi, R.H., Wolf, A., Swinnery, H.L (1982): One dimensional dynamics in amulticomponent chemical reaction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 49:245-248Sinai, Ya G. (1959) On the concept of entropy of a dynamical system. Dokl. Akad.Nauk SSSR 124:768Singer, W. (1993): Synchronization of cortical activity and its putative role ininformation processing and learning. Ann. Rev. Physiol. 55:349-374Skinner, J.E., Martin, J.L., Landisman, C.E., Mommer, M.M., Fulton, K., Mitra, M.,Burton, W.D., Saltzberg,B. (1990) Chaotic attractors in a model of neocortex:dimensionalities of olfactory bulb surface potentaisl are spatially uniform and eventrelated.In (eds. Basar, E., Bullock, T.H.) Brain Dynamics, Progress andPerspectives. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. pp 119-134Smale, S. (1967): Differentiable dynanmical systems. Bull. AMS 13:714-817Smith, L.A. (1988) Intrinsic limits on dimension calculations Phys. Lett. A133:283-288Smith, L.A. (1992) Identification and prediction of low-dimensional dynamics.Physica D58:50-76288Smotherman, W.P., Selz, K.A., Mandell, A.J. (1996) Dynamical entropy isconserved during cocaine-induced changes in fetal rat motor patterns.Psychoendocrinology 21:173-187So, P., Francis, J.T., Netoff, T.I., Gluckman, J., Schiff, S.J. (1998) Periodic orbits: anew language for neuronal dynamics. Biophys. J. 74:2776-2785So, P., Ott, E., Sauer, T., Gluckman, B.J., Grebogi, C., Schiff, S.J. (1997) Extractingunstable periodic orbits from chaotic time series. Phys. Rev. E55:5398-5417Sprott, J.C. (1993) Strange Attractors; Creating Patterns in Chaos. M&T Books.N.Y.Sprott, J.C., Rowlands, G. (1991) Chaotic Data Analyzer. Am. Institute Physics.N.Y.Stam, C.J., Nicolai, J., Keunen, R.W. (1998) Nonlinear dynamical analysis ofperiodic lateralized epileptiform discharges Clin Electroencephalogr 29:101-105Stanley, H.E. (1971): Introduction to Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena.Oxford University Press, OxfordStauffer, C. (1985) Introduction to Percolation Theory. Taylor and Francis. LondonStergiopulos, N., Porret, C.A., De Brower, S., Mesiter, J.J. (1998) Arterialvasomotion: effect of flow and evidence of nonlinear dynamics. Am J Physiol274:H1858-1864Steriade, M., McCarley, R.W. (1990) Brainstem Control of Wakefulness and Sleep.Plenum. N.Y.289Stillwell, J. (1985) Poincare’s Papers on Fuchsian Groups. Springer-Verlag, N.Y. pp1-50Stockbridge,L.L., French,A.S. (1989) Characterization of a calcium-activatedpotassium channel in human fibroblasts Can J Physiol Pharmacol 67:1300-1307gating. Biophys J 54:871-877Stoop, R., Parisi, J. (1991) Calculations of Lyapounov exponents avoiding spuriouselements. Physica D50:89-94Straver,J., Keunen, R.W., Stam, C.J., Tavy, D., de Ruiter, G., Smith, S., Thijs, L.,Schellens, R., Gielen, G.(1998): The EEG diagnosis of septic encephalopathy.Neurol. Res. 20:100-106Strogatz, S.H. (1994) Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos. Addison-Wesley.Strong, S.P., de Ruyter van Steveninck, R.R., Bialek, W., Koberle, R. (1998) On theapplication of information theory to neural spike trains. Pac Symp Biocomput 621-632Sugihara, G., May, R.M. (1990) Nonlinear forcasting as a way of distinguishingchaos from measurement error in time series. Nature 344:734-741.Sullivan, D. (1979) Rufus Bowen. Publ. Math. I.H.E.S. 50:255Szeto, H.H., Cheng, P.Y., Decena, J.A., Cheng, Y., Wu, D., Dwyer, G. (1992)Fractal properties in fetal breathing dynamics. Am. J. Physiol. 263:R141-R147.Takahashi, N., Hanyu, Y., Musha, T., Kubo, R., Matsumoto, G. (1990): Globalbifurcation structure in periodically stimulated giant axons of squid. PhysicaD43:318-334290Takens, F. (1981) Detecting strange attractors in time series. Lect. Notes. Math.898:366-381Teich M.C. (1989) Fractal character of the auditory neural spike train. IEEE TransBiomed Eng 36:150-60Teich, M.C., Heneghan, C., Lowen, S.B., Ozaki, T., Kaplan, E. (1997) Fractalcharacter of the neural spike train in the visual system of the cat. J Opt Soc Am A14:529-546Teich, M.C., Johnson, D.H., Kumar, A.R., Turcott, R.G.(1990) Rate fluctuations andfractional power-law noise recorded from cells in the lower auditory pathway of thecat. Hear Res 46:41-52Teich, M.C., Turcott, R.G., and Siegel, R.M. (1996) Temporal correlation in catstriate cortex neural spike trains. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Sept/Oct pp 79-87Tennekes, H., Lumley, J.L (1972) A First Course in Turbulence. MIT Press,Cambridge pp 256-267Theiler, J. (1990) Estimating fractal dimension. J. Opt. Am. A7:1055-1073Theiler, J.,Rapp, P.E.(1996) Re-examination of the evidence for low-dimensional,nonlinear structure in the human electroencephalogram. Electroencephalogr ClinNeurophysiol 98:213-222Thom, R. (1972) Structural Stability and Morphogenesis. Benjamin, Reading. MAThompson, D’Arcy (1942) On Growth and Form. Dover Mineola, N.Y.291Tuller, B., Ding, M., Kelso J.A.(1997) Fractal timing of verbal transforms. Perception26:913-28Ueda, Y. (1992): The Road to Chaos, Aerial Press, Santa Cruz, CAVan der Pol, B. (1926): On relaxation oscillations. Philos. Mag. (London) 2:978-980Veldhuis, J.D., Johnson, M.L. (1992) Deconvolution analysis of hormone data.Methods Enzymol. 210:539-575Vliegen, J.H.,Stam, C.J., Rombouts, S.A., Keunen, R.W. (1996) Rejection of the'filtered noise' hypothesis to explain the variability of transcranial Doppler signals: acomparison of original TCD data with Gaussian-scaled phase randomized surrogatedata sets Neurol Res 18:19-24Wackerbauer,R., Schmidt,T., Widmer,R., Pfeiffer, A., Morfill, G., Kaess, H.(1998)Discrimination of irritable bowel syndrome by non-linear analysis of 24-h jejunalmotility Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 10:331-337Wagner, C.D., Nafz, B., Persson, P.B. (1996) Chaos in blood pressure control.Cardiovasc Res 31:380-7Wayland, R., Bromley, D., Pickett, D., Passamante, A. (1993) Recognizingdeterminism in a time series. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70:580-582Wegner, D. (1994) White Bears and Other Unwanted Thoughts; Suppression,Obsession and the Psychology of Mental Control. Guilford Press. N.Y.Whitney, H. (1936) Differentiable manifolds. Ann. Math. 37:645-672292Whitney, H. (1955) On singularities of mappings of Euclidean spaces. I. Mappingsof the plane into the plane. Ann. Math. 62:374-410Whittington, M.A., Traub, R.D., Jefferys, J.G.R. (1995): Synchronized oscillations ininterneuron networks driven by metabotropic glutamate receptor activation. Nature373:612-615Wiggins, S. (1990): Introduction to Applied Dynamical Systems and Chaos.Springer. N.Y.Wilson, K.G. (1975) Review of the renormalization group. Rev. Mod. Phys. 47:773-804Wolf, A., Swift, J.B., Swinnery, H.L., Vastano, J.A. (1985) Determining Lyapounovexponents from a time series. Physica 16D:285-317Woyshville, M.J., Lackamp, J.M., Eisengart, J.A., Gilliland, J.A.M. (1999) On themeaning and measurement of affective instability; clues from chaos theory. Bio.Psychiat. 45:261-269Xu, J. (1994) The measure of sequence complexity for EEG studies. Chaos,Solitons and Fractals 4:2111-2119.Xu, N., Xu, J.H.(1988) The fractal dimension of EEG as a physical measure ofconscious human brain activities. Bull Math Biol 50:559-65Yamamoto, Y., Hughson, R.L., Sutton, J.R., Houston, C.S., Cymerman, A., Fallen,E.L., Kamath, M.V. (1993) Operation Everest II: an indication of deterministic chaosin human heart rate variability at simulated extreme altitude. Biol Cybern 69:205-212293Yates,F.E. (1992) Fractal applications in biology: scaling time in biochemicalnetworks Methods Enzymol 210:636-75Yaylali, I., Kocak, H., Jayakar, P. (1996) Detection of seizures from small samplesusing nonlinear dynamic system theory. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 43:743-751Yeomans, J.M. (1993) Statistical Mechanics of Phase Transitions. Clarendon Press,OxfordYokoyama, H., Niwa, S., Itoh K, Mazuka, R. (1996) Fractal property of eyemovements in schizophrenia. Biol Cybern 75:137-140Zabusky, N.J., Kruskal, M.D. (1965): Interaction of ‘solitons’ in a collisionlessplasma and the recurrence of initial states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 15:240-243Zeeman, C. (1976): Duffing equation in brain modeling. Bull. Inst. Math. Appl.12:207-214.Zeeman, E.C. (1977) Catastrophy Theory, Selected Papers, 1972-1977. Addison-Wesley, Reading. MAZeman, P., Toth, G., Kvetnanasky, R. (1987) Thermodynamic analysis of rat brainopioid mu-receptor-ligand interaction. Gen. Physiol. Biophys. 6:237-248Zimmerman, I.D., Rapp, P.E. (1991) The geometrical characterization of neuralactivity displays a sensitivity to convulsants. Int. J. Biofurcation Chaos 1:253-259Zhang, T., Johns, E.J. (1998) Chaotic characteristics of renal nerve peak intervalsequence in normotensive and hypertensive rats. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol25:896-903294Zipf, G.K. (1949) Human Behavior and the Principal of Least Effort. Addison-Wesley, N.Y.Zwiener, U., Hoyer, D., Bauer, R., Luthke, B., Walter, B., Schmidt, K., Hallmeyer,S.,Kratzsch, B., Eiselt, M.(1996) Deterministic--chaotic and periodic properties ofheart rate and arterial pressure fluctuations and their mediation in piglets.Cardiovasc Res 31:455-465295