File 019477
How America Lost Its Secrets: Edward Snowden and NSA Espionage (File 019477)
Front matter and table of contents from Edward Jay Epstein's 2017 book analyzing Edward Snowden's theft of NSA classified documents and its implications for American intelligence operations.
Summary
This document consists of the front matter and table of contents from Edward Jay Epstein's investigative book 'How America Lost Its Secrets,' examining the Edward Snowden case. The prologue introduces the NSA's creation and mission, details Snowden's June 2013 theft of thousands of classified documents from an NSA facility in Hawaii, and his subsequent flight to Hong Kong before asylum in Russia. The book is structured in five parts covering Snowden's background, the intelligence crisis created by the theft, implications for national security, his move to Moscow, and broader conclusions about espionage and the post-Snowden security landscape.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 19/29/16 5:51 PMalso by edward jay epsteinThe Annals of Unsolved CrimeThree Days in May: Sex, Surveillance, and DSKThe Hollywood Economist: The Hidden Financial Reality Behind the MoviesThe Big Picture: The New Logic of Money and Power in HollywoodDossier: The Secret History of Armand HammerDeception: The Invisible War Between the KGB and the CIAThe Rise and Fall of Diamonds: The Shattering of a Brilliant IllusionCartelLegend: The Secret World of Lee Harvey OswaldAgency of Fear: Opiates and Political Power in AmericaBetween Fact and Fiction: The Problem of JournalismNews from Nowhere: Television and the NewsCounterplotInquest: The Warren Commission and the Establishment of TruthEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 29/29/16 5:51 PMHOW AMERICALOST ITS SECRETSEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 19/29/16 5:51 PMEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 29/29/16 5:51 PMHOW AMERICALOST ITS SECRETSEdward Snowden, the Man and the TheftEdward Jay Epsteinalfred a. knopf | new york | 2017Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 39/29/16 5:51 PMthis is a borzoi bookpublished by alfred a. knopfCopyright © 2017 by E. J. E. Publications, Ltd.All rights reserved. Published in the United States by Alfred A. Knopf,a division of Penguin Random House LLC, New York,and distributed in Canada by Random House of Canada,a division of Penguin Random House Canada Limited, Toronto.www.aaknopf.comKnopf, Borzoi Books, and the colophonare registered trademarks of Penguin Random House LLC.Library of Congress Cataloging- in- Publication Data [to come]Jacket photograph by TKJacket design by TKManufactured in the United States of AmericaFirst EditionEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 49/29/16 5:51 PMThis book is dedicated to the memory of a wise teacher,James Q. Wilson (1931–2012)Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 59/29/16 5:51 PMEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 69/29/16 5:51 PMThere are certain persons who . . . have a perfect rightto commit breaches of morality and crimes, and . . .the law is not for them.—fyodor dostoyevsky, Crime and PunishmentEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 79/29/16 5:51 PMEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 89/29/16 5:51 PMContentsPrologue Snowden’s Trail: Hong Kong, 2014 000part one SNOWDEN’S ARCchapter 1 Tinker 15chapter 2 Secret Agent 22chapter 3 Contractor 28chapter 4 Thief 38chapter 5 Crossing the Rubicon 44chapter 6 Hacktivist 49chapter 7 String Puller 59chapter 8 Raider of the Inner Sanctum 73chapter 9 Escape Artist 80chapter 10 Whistle- blower 88chapter 11 Enter Assange 98chapter 12 Fugitive 104part two THE INTELLIGENCE CRISISchapter 13 The Great Divide 113chapter 14 The Crime Scene Investigation 133Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 99/29/16 5:51 PMx | Contentschapter 15 Did Snowden Act Alone? 146chapter 16 The Question of When 156chapter 17 The Keys to the Kingdom Are Missing 168chapter 18 The Unheeded Warning 185part three THE GAME OF NATIONSchapter 19 The Rise of the NSA 195chapter 20 The NSA’s Back Door 207chapter 21 The Russians Are Coming 217chapter 22 The Chinese Puzzle 231chapter 23 A Single Point of Failure 238part four MOSCOW CALLINGchapter 24 Off to Moscow 247chapter 25 Through the Looking Glass 254chapter 26 The Handler 261part five CONCLUSIONS: WALKING THE CAT BACKchapter 27 Snowden’s Choices 271chapter 28 The Espionage Source 281chapter 29 The “War on Terror” After Snowden 287Epilogue The Snowden Effect 295Acknowledgments 301Notes 303Selected Bibliography 325Index 329Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 109/29/16 5:51 PMHOW AMERICALOST ITS SECRETSEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 19/29/16 5:51 PMEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 29/29/16 5:51 PMPrologueSnowden’s Trail: Hong Kong, 2014The national security agency, or, as it is now commonlycalled, the NSA, was created on October 24, 1952, in such a tightcocoon of secrecy that even the presidential order creating it wasclassified top secret. When journalists asked questions about thisnew agency, Washington officials jokingly told them that the initialsNSA stood for “No Such Agency.” The reason for this extraordinarystealth is that the NSA is involved in a very sensitive enterprise.Its job is to intercept, decode, and analyze foreign electronic communicationstransmitted around the globe over copper wires, fiberopticcable, satellite, microwave relays, cell phone towers, wirelesstransmissions, and the Internet for specified intelligence purposes. Inintelligence jargon, its product is called COMINT, which stands forcommunications intelligence. Because this form of intelligence gatheringis most effective when the NSA’s targets are unaware of thestate- of- the- art tools the NSA uses to break into their computersand telecommunications channels to first intercept and then decryptEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 39/29/16 5:51 PM4 | how america lost its secretstheir secret messages, the NSA goes to extraordinary lengths to keepthem secret. Draconian laws protect this secrecy.In the first week of June 2013, the NSA learned that there hadbeen a massive breach. Thousands of secret files bearing on communicationsintelligence had been stolen from a heavily guardedregional base in Oahu, Hawaii.The suspect was Edward Snowden, a twenty- nine- year- old civiliananalyst at that base, who had fled to Hong Kong before thebreach was discovered. According to a three- count criminal complaintfiled by federal prosecutors in the Eastern District of Virginia,Snowden had stolen government property and violated theEspionage Act by the unauthorized and willful communication ofnational defense information to an unauthorized person. He alsolikely violated the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act by entering computersystems illicitly.This was not a whodunit mystery. On June 9, 2013, in an extraordinarytwelve- minute video made in a cramped hotel room in HongKong, Snowden identified himself as the person who had taken theNSA documents. Watching the video, the world saw a shy, awkward,and sympathetic- looking man wearing a rumpled shirt, rimlessglasses, and a computer- geek haircut, passionately speaking outagainst what he termed the NSA’s violations of the law and, in ashaky voice, expressing his willingness to suffer the consequencesfor exposing them.Snowden had an innocent, idealistic, principled look about him,and the world was ready to congratulate him for revealing the NSA’salleged illegal collection of data inside the United States. But in fact,Snowden had stolen a great deal more than documents relating todomestic surveillance. He had also stolen secret documents from theNSA, the CIA, the Department of Defense, and the British cipherservice revealing the sources and methods they employed in theirmonitoring of adversaries, which was their job.By the time the theft had been discovered, in the first week ofJune 2013, it was impossible for the FBI, a grand jury, or any otherU.S. agency to question him because he had fled the country. Hisfirst stop, Hong Kong, the economically autonomous city of 7.2 million,is a special administrative region of mainland China. Under theEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 49/29/16 5:51 PMPrologue | 5terms of the 1997 transfer of sovereignty from Great Britain, Chinais responsible for Hong Kong’s defense and foreign policy, includingintelligence services. He then proceeded to Russia, which has noextradition treaty with the United States. Russia granted him asylum,making it unlikely that U.S. authorities would ever have theopportunity to question him.Snowden’s escape left in its wake an incredibly important unsolvedmystery: How had a young analyst in training at the NSA succeededin penetrating all the layers of NSA security to pull off the largesttheft of secret documents in the history of American intelligence?Did he act alone? What happened to the documents? Was his arrivalin Russia part of the plan?Because I had written several books on the vulnerability of intelligenceservices, this was a mystery— a “howdunit,” if you like— thatimmediately intrigued me. Even if Snowden had acted for the mostsalutary of reasons, the unauthorized transfer of state secrets fromthe United States to an adversary country is, by almost any definition,a form of espionage.I decided to begin my investigation of this case in Hong Kong,because it was the place to which Snowden first fled after leavingHawaii. Snowden had planned the trip for at least four weeks,according to the mandatory travel plan he had filed at the NSA.When I spoke to my sources in the intelligence community, theycould not explain Snowden’s choice. It would not necessarily protecthim from the reach of U.S. law, because Hong Kong had an activeextradition treaty with the United States. Just a few months earlier,Hong Kong had made headlines by honoring America’s request toextradite Trent Martin, a fugitive wanted for insider trading.Nor was Hong Kong particularly convenient to Hawaii. Therewere no nonstop flights there from Honolulu in May 2013. Snowdenflew eight hours to Narita International Airport in Japan, where hewaited almost three hours. He then flew five hours to Hong Kong.Snowden could have flown to countries that do not have extraditiontreaties with America in far less time.Adding to this mystery, at the time he departed Honolulu,Snowden had not yet arranged for any journalists to meet him inHong Kong, and as far as U.S. intelligence could determine, he hadEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 59/29/16 5:51 PM6 | how america lost its secretsno known appointments there. Even so, Snowden carried to HongKong digital copies he had made of the top secret NSA documents.As General Michael Hayden, who served as the head of both theNSA and the CIA, told me, “It’s very mysterious why Snowdenchose Hong Kong.” We can assume he had a compelling enough reasonfor him to take the risk that he would be arrested there by HongKong police after U.S. authorities invoked the detention provisionof its extradition treaty. It was of course possible that Snowden hadtraveled there to see someone he believed could protect him.I arrived in Hong Kong on May 20, 2014— exactly one year afterSnowden had arrived there aboard a Japan Airlines flight. I checkedin to the Mira hotel in the Tsim Sha Tsui shopping district of Kowloon,a ten- minute ferry ride away from Hong Kong Island, wheremost of the foreign consulates are located.I chose the Mira because it was the five- star hotel in whichSnowden had stayed and where he had made the celebrated videoadmitting his role in taking the NSA documents. I asked at the frontdesk for room 1014, the same one that Snowden had occupied in2013, because I wanted easy access to the hotel’s service and securitypersonnel responsible for the room who might have had contactwith Snowden a year earlier. Unfortunately, that room was occupied,but I was given a nearby room that served my purpose.Snowden had told Glenn Greenwald and Laura Poitras, theGuardian reporters he met in Hong Kong, that he had hidden outat the Mira hotel since his arrival in Hong Kong because he fearedthat the CIA might capture him. My first surprise was that Snowdenhad not arrived at the Mira until eleven days after he arrived inHong Kong. As I learned from the hotel staff, Snowden had registeredthere under his real name and used his own passport and creditcard to secure the room, an odd choice if he was hiding out. He hadchecked in to the hotel not on May 20, as he had told the reporters,but on June 1, 2013. He checked out on June 10.Wherever Snowden stayed from May 20 to June 1, he apparentlyconsidered it a safe enough place from which to send Greenwald a“welcome package,” as he called it, of twenty top secret NSA docu-Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 69/29/16 5:51 PMPrologue | 7ments on May 25. He had now not only downloaded documents butalso violated the oath he had signed when he took his job by providingthem to an unauthorized party. During this period, Snowdenalso contacted Barton Gellman, on behalf of The Washington Post,via e- mail. Indeed, while he was staying someplace other than theplace he claimed to be staying, he made almost all the arrangementsfor his journalistic coming- out. He was in contact with at least oneforeign mission during this period, according to what he wrote toGellman on May 24. In that e- mail, concerning when and how hisstory was to be published by The Washington Post, Snowden askedGellman to include some text that would help Snowden with hisdealings with this mission. But which country was he approaching?In an effort to establish Snowden’s whereabouts during these “missing”eleven days, which, among other things, could shed light onwhy he first came to Hong Kong, I called Keith Bradsher, a prizewinningjournalist who had been the New York Times bureau chief inHong Kong in 2013. He had written a well- researched report aboutSnowden’s arrival there. He proposed we meet at the Foreign Correspondents’Club.Bradsher told me that he had known Albert Ho, who had beenretained as Snowden’s lawyer, for more than a decade. He had interviewedhim many times, because he was a leader of a political movementin Hong Kong. Bradsher said that a few days after Snowdenhad revealed himself on June 9, he met with Ho and questioned himabout Snowden’s unknown whereabouts.Ho told Bradsher that all of Snowden’s logistics had been arrangedfor him by an intermediary, whom Ho called a “carer.” Ho said thatSnowden had been in contact with the “carer” prior to his arrival inHong Kong on May 20. According to Ho, it was this person who hadarranged accommodations for Snowden on his arrival and afterward.If so, it seemed to me that this person might be able to shed lighton whom, if anyone, Snowden saw in his first eleven days in HongKong. Even if this person might have been unaware of the reasonsfor Snowden’s trip to Hong Kong when he made the arrangementsfor him, he was still the best lead I had to learning why Snowdenhad come to Hong Kong. Bradsher told me that he pressed Ho fordetails about this mystery person over the course of several meet-Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 79/29/16 5:51 PM8 | how america lost its secretsings but Ho would not identify him beyond saying that he was a“well- connected resident” of Hong Kong.I called Ho’s law office in Hong Kong. He politely declined to beinterviewed by me, saying he had said all he was going to say aboutthe Snowden case. I was able, though, to make an appointment withRobert Tibbo, a Canadian- born barrister specializing in civil libertiescases. Tibbo had worked closely with Ho on the Snowden case.I met Tibbo in the tearoom at the Mandarin Oriental hotel onHong Kong Island. Tibbo, in his early fifties, was tall, with a roundface and thinning hair. He talked freely about his remarkable career.After earning a degree in chemical engineering from McGill Universityand working in Asia as an engineer for a decade, he went to lawschool in New Zealand and became a barrister in Hong Kong specializingin cases involving the legal status of refugees.Over a leisurely tea, Tibbo made it clear that he had played a farmore active role than Ho in the Snowden case. He had even personallyescorted Snowden from the Mira hotel to a safe house onJune 10. He did not dispute what Ho had told Bradsher. When I askedhim if he could give me the name of the “carer,” he said that he wasbound by a lawyer- client privilege that prevented him from providingme with any details that might reveal the identity of the personwho had made arrangements for Snowden. When I asked the datethat he was officially retained by Snowden, he said that Snowdenhad signed an agreement hiring him and Ho’s law firm as his legaladviser on June 10, 2013 (which was a matter of public record).“I understand that,” I said, “but I am inquiring about somethingthat had happened before you became his legal adviser.” He shookhis head, as if getting rid of a pesky fly, and said that his oath precludedhim from saying anything at all that might do damage tothe credibility of his client. “Not even where he was staying in Mayin Hong Kong?” I persisted. He leaned forward and, after a briefhesitation, said, jokingly I assumed, that he would not divulge thatinformation, “even if you held a gun to my head.” We met two moretimes, but true to his word Tibbo would not say if he even knew theidentity of the “carer.”Meanwhile, Joyce Xu, a very resourceful Chinese journalist whowas assisting me in Hong Kong, had filed the equivalent of a FreedomEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 89/29/16 5:51 PMPrologue | 9of Information request with the Hong Kong Security Bureau askingfor information about Snowden’s movements in May. ThomasNg, the secretary for security, turned down the request, adding thatHong Kong authorities do not keep records of hotel registrations. Ihad run into a dead end with the Hong Kong authorities on the issueof Snowden’s “carer” and Snowden’s whereabouts for those elevencrucial days.At this point, I got some much- needed help from an old friend onthe Obama White House staff. Before I had left New York, I askedhim if he could find someone at the consulate in Hong Kong whomight brief me on the Snowden case. I didn’t hear from him untiljust a few days before I was due to return to New York. He put mein touch with a former employee of the Hong Kong consulate, whohe said was “fully informed” about the efforts of the U.S. mission tolocate Snowden in Hong Kong. This person was still living in HongKong, and he agreed to meet with me on condition that I did notmention either his name or his specific job in the U.S. mission inHong Kong. The venue was the terrace lounge of the American Clubin Exchange Square in central Hong Kong, a posh club mainly forexpatriate Americans. It was on the forty- eighth floor, with a spectacularview of Victoria Harbor. Once there, I had no problem findingmy source, identifying him by the description he had given me.He was sitting alone at a discreet table in the corner.After we ordered drinks, he told me in a soft voice about the Americanreaction to Snowden’s revelations in Hong Kong. “All hell brokeloose,” he said, describing the atmosphere at the U.S. mission afterSnowden’s video was posted on The Guardian’s website on June 9.I asked about an assertion that Snowden had made concerning theU.S. consulate in that extraordinary video. Snowden had said that hecould be seized at any moment by a CIA rendition team based at theU.S. consulate “just down the road” from the Mira hotel.“Was that true?” I asked.He rolled his eyes and said, “Snowden has a pretty wild imagination.For one thing, the U.S. consulate is not down the road from theMira in Kowloon; it is here on Hong Kong Island. And there was noCIA rendition team in Hong Kong.”My next question concerned a second period during whichEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 99/29/16 5:51 PM10 | how america lost its secretsSnowden’s whereabouts are clouded— the period between the timehe left the Mira hotel on June 10 and the day he left Hong Kong forRussia on June 23. When I asked my consulate source whether theU.S. mission took any action to track Snowden during these thirteendays, he explained that the FBI had long maintained a contingentof “legal attachés” based at the consulate to pursue many possibleviolations of U.S. law including video piracy. In addition, the CIAand the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) had retained a handful of“China watchers” under diplomatic cover in Hong Kong. This groupconstituted the “intelligence mission,” as he referred to it. It haddeveloped informal relations with the Hong Kong police that, alongwith the NSA’s electronic capabilities abroad, allowed it to trackSnowden’s movements after he had outed himself on the video.Because Snowden, his lawyers, and the journalists in his entouragefrequently used their cell phones to text one another, it was fairlyeasy for the U.S. intelligence mission to follow Snowden’s trail afterhe left the Mira hotel. He said that the Hong Kong police also knewwhere he was during this period. My source further suggested thatthe massive Chinese intelligence contingent in Hong Kong alsoknew, because it had close relations with the Hong Kong police.“So everyone knew Snowden’s whereabouts as he moved everyfew days from apartment to apartment,” I interjected. He answeredthat it was no secret to anyone except the media and the public. “Ofcourse we knew,” he said, adding that there were also photographsof Snowden entering the office building that housed the Russianconsulate. I mentioned that there was a report in a Russian newspaperthat Snowden had visited the Russian consulate in late June inconnection with the flight he later took to Moscow. “All we know ishe entered the building,” he answered, with a shrug.That Russian consulate visit did not come as a complete surpriseto U.S. intelligence. After Snowden left the Mira, his interactionswith the Russian and Chinese intelligence services in Hong Konghad been closely monitored by “secret means,” a term that in thatcontext likely indicated electronic surveillance. A former top intelligenceexecutive in Washington, D.C., subsequently confirmed thismonitoring to me. All of Snowden’s stealth in exiting from the Mirahotel, which included wearing a baseball cap and dark glasses, thusEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 109/29/16 5:51 PMPrologue | 11proved ineffective in hiding him from U.S. intelligence and presumablyother intelligence services seeking the treasure trove of documentshe had taken from the NSA.As for his next destination, I could find no evidence that Snowdenhad made any arrangements during his monthlong stay in HongKong to go to any Latin American country. Before he went publicon June 9, he could have easily gotten a visa in Hong Kong with hisstill- valid passport to go to almost any country in the world, includingCuba (for which a U.S. passport was not necessary), Bolivia, andEcuador. Yet he did not apply for visas during this time period. Evenas late as June 8, after meetings with Greenwald and Poitras, hisname had still not been revealed, no criminal complaint had beenissued against him, and there was no Interpol red alert for his detention.He could have walked out of the Mira hotel, caught a taxi tothe Hong Kong airport, and gone on Swiss International Air Linesvia Zurich to any country in South America or to Iceland. But, asin the oft- cited Sherlock Holmes clue of the dog that did not bark,Snowden’s inaction in not obtaining visas during this thirty- dayperiod suggests that he had no plans to go anyplace but where hewent: Moscow.However, the mystery that most concerned me was not whereSnowden was housed in the interim between when he went publicand when he went to Moscow. It was where, and in whose care,Snowden had been before he checked into the Mira on June 1. WhenI asked my source about this period, he said that as far as he knew,neither the FBI nor the Hong Kong police could find a trace of himduring the period between May 20, when he passed through HongKong customs, and June 1, when he first used his credit card andpassport to check into the Mira hotel. Other than those transactions,they could not find any credit card charges, ATM withdrawals,telephone calls, hotel registrations, subway pass purchases, or otherclues to Snowden’s activities. As far as a paper trail was concerned,Snowden was a ghost during this period.“Could an American just vanish in Hong Kong for eleven days?”I asked.“Apparently, he did just that,” my source replied.Snowden’s whereabouts during these eleven days was not a mys-Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 119/29/16 5:51 PM12 | how america lost its secretstery I was going to solve on this first trip to Hong Kong. I needed toknow more about his activities before he got there. After all, Snowdenwas not, as he himself pointed out from Moscow, an “angel descendingfrom the heavens.” He had been working for the U.S. governmentfor the previous seven years. During that period, he had beenpart of America’s secret intelligence regime and held a clearance forsensitive compartmented information, or SCI. Such SCI material isconsidered so sensitive that it must be handled within formal accesscontrol systems established by the director of national intelligence.Nor did Snowden’s breach begin with his handing over classifieddocuments to the Guardian reporters in Hong Kong in June 2013 or,for that matter, in the eleven days prior to his meeting with journalists.He had, as the NSA quickly determined, begun illicitly copyingdocuments in the summer of 2012. Such a dangerous enterprise isnot born of a sudden impulse. It was, as his actions suggested, nurturedover many months. Even if he had managed to elude Americanintelligence from late May to early June 2013, he could not hide allthe history that led to his decision to come to Hong Kong. Therehad to be an envelope of circumstances surrounding it, includingSnowden’s motivation, associates, movements, finances, and activitiesprior to his fleeing to Hong Kong. What was missing was notjust Snowden’s first eleven days in Hong Kong but the context ofthe alleged crime.I first needed to find out who Edward Snowden was.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 129/29/16 5:51 PMpart oneSNOWDEN’S ARCI woke this morning with a new name. I had had a vision.A dream vision. A vision righteous and true. Before me I sawGamers, Gamers shrouded in the glory of their true names.Step forth, and assume your name in the pantheon. It’salways been there, your avatar’s true name. It slips throughyour subconscious, reveals itself under your posts, andflashed visibly in that moment of unrestrained spite; in theindulgent teabag. You’ve felt it, known it, recognized it.Now realize it.I woke this morning with a new name. That name isWolfking.Wolfking Awesomefox.—edward snowden, Geneva, June 12, 2008Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 139/29/16 5:51 PMEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 149/29/16 5:51 PMchapter 1TinkerIt’s like the boiling frog. You get exposed to a little bit of evil,a little bit of rule- breaking, a little bit of dishonesty . . . you cancome to justify it.— edward snowden, Moscow, 2014Edward joseph snowden was born on June 21, 1983, in ElizabethCity, North Carolina. His parents were Lon Snowden andElizabeth “Wendy” Barrett. According to their marriage records,they wed when they were both eighteen in 1979. The following yearthey had a daughter, Jessica.Lon Snowden, like his father before him, served in the U.S. CoastGuard. He was stationed at its main aviation base, where his fatherin-law, Edward Joseph Barrett, was an officer and rising star of theCoast Guard. While Edward Snowden was still a child, his maternalgrandfather would become not only an admiral but also head of theCoast Guard’s entire aviation service.When Lon was transferred to a Coast Guard base near Baltimorein 1992, he bought a two- story house in Crofton, Maryland, a residentialcommunity very close to the NSA’s headquarters buildingat Fort Meade. Edward, who was nine, and Jessica, who was twelve,were enrolled in local public schools in Crofton.Jessica was a top student. After she obtained her degree at theEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 159/29/16 5:51 PM16 | how america lost its secretsUniversity of Maryland, she went on to law school, graduating withhonors. Unlike his sister, Edward Snowden experienced a string offailures in his education. In 1998, after only one year of classes, hedropped out of Arundel High School; according to school records,he stopped attending classes at the age of fifteen. He later attributedhis absence from school to a medical problem, mononucleosis, butaccording to Robert Mosier, a spokesman for Anne Arundel Countypublic schools, there is no record of any illness. Brad Gunson, whoknew Snowden before he dropped out of high school, recalled in aninterview with The Washington Post only that he had a high- pitchedvoice, liked magic cards, and played fantasy video games.Instead of completing a formal education, Snowden went his ownway. Still in his teens, he became the product of a broken home. Hisparents were entangled in messy divorce proceedings until he wasseventeen. By this time, Jessica had her own apartment. When hisparents separated, Snowden’s mother bought a two- bedroom condominiumin Ellicott City, Maryland. She moved Edward, along withhis two cats, into the condominium, while she remained in the familyhouse awaiting its sale. According to a condominium neighbor,Joyce Kinsey, Snowden stayed home alone almost all the time. Fromwhat she could observe, he spent long hours in front of a computerscreen.At the age of eighteen, while other teens his age went to college,Snowden was still living by himself, now devoting a large part of histime to playing fantasy games on the Internet. Posting under thealias TheTrueHooHa on a website called Ars Technica, he showedhimself to be a passionate gamer. He was especially drawn to anime,a graphically violent style of Japanese animation. These animegames had by 2002 achieved a fanatic following in both Japan andthe United States. He claimed special skills at Tekken, a martial artsfighting game. He even went to anime conventions in the Washington,D.C., area. When he became a webmaster for Ryuhana Press,a website running these anime- based games, he described himselfsomewhat fancifully as a thirty- seven- year- old father of two children.The only truth in his description was that he was born on “thelongest day of the year” (June 21).He wrote Internet posts under his TrueHooHa alias about how heEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 169/29/16 5:51 PMTinker | 17used weight lifting and intensive training to precision shape his body.He bragged to his online followers that he had reduced his “body fatpercentage to between 9.5% and 10.5%” (which was less than halfof the average for his age). He wrote that he wore “cool” purple sunglasses,practiced martial arts, and was a fan of Japanese cuisine. Hedescribed himself at one point, as if advertising his virtues, as havinga “head of vibrant, shimmering blond hair (with volume).”He appeared somewhat restless with his solitary life in his almostdaily postings. He expressed a longing to go to Japan. “I’ve alwaysdreamed of being able to ‘make it’ in Japan. I’ve taken Japanese fora year and a half,” he wrote in 2002. Despite his claim of learningJapanese, there is no record of his taking any courses in Japanese.But it was perhaps part of his yearning. In pursuit of an employmentopportunity in Japan, he posted, “I’d love a cushy gov job overthere.” Eventually, he gave up on the idea of relocating himself toJapan because, as he explained in a post, he would have to put his catsin quarantine for six months.Snowden’s father meanwhile moved to Pennsylvania with hisnew wife- to- be. This left Snowden with only one male family memberin the area, his maternal grandfather, Admiral Barrett, who wasnow in the top echelon of U.S. intelligence working at the Pentagon.Barrett was there when a plane piloted by terrorists crashed into iton 9/11. He emerged unscathed.Snowden sought to join the Special Forces through the 18X program,a U.S. Army Reserve program created in 2003 that allowedindividuals who had not served in the military or completed theireducation to train to be a Special Forces recruit. He listed his religionon the application as Buddhist because, as he explained in a sardonicpost on Ars Technica, “agnostic is strangely absent” from the form.He enlisted in the army reserves on May 7, 2004, according toU.S. Army records. He reported for a ten- week basic training at FortBenning, Georgia, which was standard for all enlistees in the infantry.In August, he began a three- week course in parachute jumpingbut did not complete that training. As Snowden put it in his Internetpostings, he “washed out.” He was discharged on September 29,2004, ending his nineteen- week military career. Snowden wouldlater claim on the Internet that he returned to civilian life becauseEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 179/29/16 5:51 PM18 | how america lost its secretshe had broken both legs. An army spokesman could not confirm thatSnowden injured his legs or that he was in fact dropped from theprogram for medical reasons.Under his TrueHooHa alias, Snowden wrote that “they [the army]held on to me until the doctors cleared me to be discharged, and thenafter being cleared they held onto me for another month just forshits and giggles.” He attributed this treatment in the army, as hewould later attribute his problems in the CIA and the NSA, to theinferior intelligence of his superiors. He wrote in his post, “Psychproblems = dishonorable discharge depending on how much theyhate you. Lots of alleged homos were in the hold unit, too, but theyonly got a general discharge at best.”If he had broken his legs, it was not evident to Joyce Kinsey, hisnext- door neighbor, who told me that she never saw Snowden oncrutches when he returned to his mother’s condominium in September2004. Army records show that he did not receive a medicaldischarge. He received an “administrative discharge.” Unlike a medicaldischarge, which is given because a soldier has sustained injuriesthat prevent him from performing his duties, an administrative dischargeis a “morally neutral” form of separation given to a soldierwhen he or she is deemed for nonmedical reasons inappropriate formilitary service. Snowden preferred to cite a medical explanation forhis severance, just as he had claimed a medical reason for droppingout of high school (and would later claim he needed medical treatmentfor epilepsy at the NSA).When he returned home from Fort Benning, Georgia, he wastwenty- one. He remained unemployed for several months beforetaking a job as a security guard at the University of Maryland’s Centerfor Advanced Study of Language, where he was given his firstsecurity clearance. Snowden had to take a polygraph exam to getthe job. According to his Ars Technica postings, he worked the nightshift from six in the evening to six in the morning. He had higherambitions than being a campus security guard.He wanted to become a male model. He did not seem overly concernedabout his privacy, posting pictures of himself on the Internet“mooning” for the camera. He also posted provocative modeling picturesof himself on the Ars Technica website. He commented on hisEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 189/29/16 5:51 PMTinker | 19own beefcake- style pictures, “So sexxxy it hurts” and “I like my girlishfigure that attracts girls.” He approached a model agency calledModel Mayhem, which recommended a photographer. He had someconcern about that photographer because he, as Snowden wrote ina post, “shoots mostly guys.” Snowden said he was “a little worriedhe might, you know, try to pull my pants off and choke me to deathwith them, but he turned out to be legit and is a pretty damn goodmodel photographer.” He posted the photographs on the Internet.The lack of any paid job offers dashed Snowden’s hopes for a modelingcareer.Around this time, he began dating Lindsay Mills, an extremelyattractive nineteen- year- old art student at the Maryland InstituteCollege of Art. Jonathan Mills, Lindsay’s father, was an applicationsdeveloper at the Oracle Corporation. According to him, Snowdenmet his daughter on an Internet dating site. Snowden and Mills hadmuch in common. They both had divorced parents who gave them agreat deal of latitude in conducting their personal lives. Both of themwere keenly interested in perfecting their bodies through exerciseand diet regimes. Mills’s only paid employment over the next eightyears would be as a fitness and yoga instructor in Maryland. Whenthey first met, they both had ambitions to be models, and neither ofthem had inhibitions about posing provocatively for photographers.They both also had a desire to travel to exotic places, including citiesin Asia. Mills had spent four month in Guilin, China, before meetingSnowden.As bleak as his prospects as a high-school dropout might haveseemed, Snowden had an unexpected stroke of good fortune in thespring of 2006. The CIA offered him a $66,000- a- year job as a CIAcommunications officer. “I don’t have a degree of ANY type. In fact,I don’t even have a high school diploma,” Snowden boasted in May2006 on the website Ars Technica under his alias. He added, withonly a slight exaggeration, “I make 70K.”How did Snowden get the job? The CIA’s minimum requirementsin 2006 for a job in its clandestine division included a bachelor’s ormaster’s degree and a strong academic record, with a preferred GPAof 3.0 or better.The CIA needed technical workers in 2006. But even if SnowdenEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 199/29/16 5:51 PM20 | how america lost its secretsapplied only in this capacity, which entailed a five- year employmentagreement, the minimum requirement for an intelligence technologyjob was an associate’s degree awarded by a two- year communitycollege in electronics and communications, engineering technology,computer network systems, or electronics engineering technology.Candidates had to have had a final GPA of at least 3.0 on a 4.0 scalefrom a fully accredited technical school or university. Snowden, aswe’ve seen, did not meet these standards. If a candidate lacks thesequalifications, the CIA can make an exception only if he or she hasat least two years’ civilian or military work experience in the telecommunicationsand/or automated information systems field that iscomparable to one of the requisite degree fields. Snowden in no wayqualified in this way either.Under extraordinary circumstances, even the minimum requirementsmight be waived if the applicant had a distinguished militarycareer and an honorable discharge. Snowden, however, did notcomplete his military training at Fort Benning and received only anadministrative discharge.The CIA, to be sure, had needed computer- savvy recruits to serviceits expanding array of computer systems since 1990. By 2006,however, there was no shortage of fully qualified applicants for ITjobs who met the CIA’s minimum standards. Most of them had universitycourse records, work experience at IT companies, computerscience training certificates from technical schools, and other suchcredentials. The CIA, like the NSA, also obtained technicians withspecial skills for IT jobs from outside contractors. So it had no needfor employing a twenty- two- year- old dropout who did not meet itsrequisites. According to Tyler Drumheller, a former CIA station chiefin Europe, the only plausible way that Snowden, with no qualifications,was allowed to jump the queue was that “he had some pull.”In 2006, Snowden’s grandfather, who had attained the rank ofrear admiral, was certainly well connected in the intelligence world.After twenty years’ service in the Coast Guard, Barrett had joinedan interagency task force in 1998, which included top executivesfrom the CIA, the FBI, and the Drug Enforcement Administration.It had been set up to monitor any gaps in the U.S. embargo on Cuba,and Barrett, as one of its leaders, was in constant liaison with theEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 209/29/16 5:51 PMTinker | 21CIA. By 2004, he had joined the FBI as the section head of its aviationand special operations. In this capacity, he supervised the jointCIA- FBI interrogation of the prisoners in the Guantánamo base inCuba, which involved him in the rendition program for terrorists.Barrett could certainly have played a role in furthering his onlygrandson’s employment. The CIA, however, has not disclosed anyinformation about who, if anyone, recommended Snowden. All thatis known is that in 2006 the CIA waived its minimum requirementsfor him.Later Snowden pointed out from Moscow that in 2006 the federalgovernment employed his entire family. His father was servingin the Coast Guard; his mother was an administrative clerk for thefederal court in Maryland; his sister was a research director at theFederal Judicial Center; and Admiral Barrett was still a top executiveat the FBI. In a sense, Snowden had entered the family business.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 219/29/16 5:51 PMchapter 2Secret AgentSure, a whistleblower could use these [NSA computer vulnerabilities],but so could a spy.— edward snowden, Moscow, 2014The sudden transformation of Snowden in 2006 from anight watchman on a university campus to an employee forthe CIA provided him with a powerful new identity and one muchcloser to the avatars he adopted for his fantasy games. It was burnishedso deeply in his self- image that he cited it eight years later,in exaggerated fashion, in Moscow. When Brian Williams, then anNBC anchorman, began an hour- long television interview withSnowden in 2014 by saying, “It seems to me spies probably look alot more like Ed Snowden and a lot less like James Bond these days,”Snowden approvingly smiled and told him, “I was trained as a spyin sort of the traditional sense of the word.” Snowden further confirmedhis interviewer’s point, stating, “I lived and worked undercoveroverseas— pretending to work in a job that I’m not [in]— andeven being assigned a name that was not mine.”In reality, Snowden’s employment at the CIA was far more prosaic.When he joined the CIA, he did not have the required experiencein maintaining secret communication systems, so the CIA sentEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 229/29/16 5:51 PMSecret Agent | 23him to its information technology school for six months to train asa communications officer, not a spy. After completing his training,he was dispatched to the CIA station in Geneva. He worked therefor the next two years as one of dozens of information technologistsservicing the CIA’s communication channels in Switzerland. He wasstationed there, according to Swiss registry records, under his ownname from March 2007 to February 2009. He was identified as a U.S.State Department employee in Geneva because Switzerland doesnot allow any intelligence officers to operate in its country. Officially,he was attached to the permanent U.S. mission to the UnitedNations, which employed hundreds of U.S. government functionariesin Switzerland. It was a thin cover; the Swiss government wasaware that the CIA maintained its base in Geneva and posted itsemployees at the U.S. mission.Although Snowden would claim in a video he made in HongKong that he had served as a “senior adviser for the Central IntelligenceAgency,” he was merely a telecommunications support officer,or TSO in CIA parlance, which was a junior- level job at the CIA.He worked as part of a team of information technologists under thesupervision of senior CIA officers, according to a former CIA officerin Geneva. The job of these TSOs was to protect the security of theCIA’s computer systems through which the CIA station in Genevasent and received its secret communications.As far as is known, Snowden made very few friends at the eighthundred-person mission. The only person to have publicly reportedknowing him in Geneva during this period is Mavanee Anderson, ayoung and attractive summer intern at the U.S. mission from Mayto August 2007. She described befriending Snowden, who, accordingto her, said that he was in the CIA and also demonstrated to her hismartial arts skills. She later recalled in interviews that he was “a bit”prone to brooding and voiced growing dissatisfaction with the CIA.The job in Geneva did have its benefits, however. It provided himwith a generous housing and travel allowance. In many ways, it wasthe “cushy government job” he had said he was seeking in his Internetposts. He rented a four- room apartment and had his girlfriend,Lindsay Mills, now twenty- one, join him there.According to his posts on the Ars Technica website, he took fullEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 239/29/16 5:51 PM24 | how america lost its secretsadvantage of his compensation to live the high life. He gambled onfinancial developments by buying and selling options, which arecontracts that allow speculators to bet on the directions of the marketwithout buying the actual stocks, bonds, or commodities. He alsobought a BMW sports car on which, he wrote, he disabled the speedcontrol so he could exceed the legal limit. He described in his postsracing motorcycles in Italy and traveling around Germany with anEstonian rock star (whom he did not further identify). He also continuedhis avatar life in Internet gaming; the alias he chose for thatwas Wolfking Awesomefox. He also indulged in a fantasy gun sportcalled Airsoft, a variation of paintball, in which participants usedrealistic- looking pistols to splatter each other with paint.Snowden’s good fortune came to an abrupt end in 2008. He suffereda massive loss in his options speculations. He wrote in a postthat he had “lost $20,000 in October [2008] alone,” a sum that representedalmost a third of his annual salary. He blamed the U.S. financialsystem, posting on Ars Technica that Ben Bernanke, the FederalReserve chairman, was a “cockbag.” He also bet against any furtherrise in the stock market index, asking a user with whom he was chattingon the Internet in December 2008 to “pray” for a collapse ofstock prices. When his correspondent asked him why he wanted himto pray for a decline, Snowden responded, “Because then I’ll be filthyfucking rich.” But Snowden lost this bet.Snowden lashed out at others on the Internet over these setbacks.He termed those who questioned his financial judgment “fuckingretards.” As with other setbacks, he blamed them on government officialsin Ars Technica posts. Because the CIA was engaged in 2008 inhighly sensitive operations to gather banking data in Switzerland—one of which Snowden later disclosed to The Guardian— any Internetdiscussion by a CIA employee of financial losses could serve as abeacon to an adversary intelligence service on the prowl for a source.If any party was looking for disgruntled U.S. employees, Snowden’sInternet chatter about bad choices in gambling could have arousedits interest.That Snowden used his TrueHooHa alias for these Internet postingswould not prevent a sophisticated espionage organization fromEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 249/29/16 5:51 PMSecret Agent | 25quickly uncovering his true identity. He was listed by his true nameon the roster of the U.S. mission to the UN. By consulting personnelrecords, one would further discover that he did not actually work forthe State Department. Because it was no secret that the U.S. missionin Geneva housed the CIA station for all of Switzerland, any outsiderwould think it probable that this brittle gambler who playedthe options market worked for the CIA.Even though it cannot be precluded that Snowden was spottedin Geneva by another intelligence service, there is no evidence, atleast that I know of, to suggest that he was approached by one. Noris there reason to believe that if he had been contacted by a foreignservice in 2008, he would have responded positively. Despitehis indiscreet posting about his outside activities, he apparently stillrespected the boundaries of secrecy that had been clearly defined inthe oath he had taken at the CIA. For example, after The New YorkTimes published an article revealing secret American intelligenceactivities in Iran on January 11, 2009, Snowden railed against thenewspaper on the Internet under his TrueHooHa alias. He wrote,“This shit is classified for a reason. . . . It’s because this shit won’twork if Iran knows what we are doing.” He clearly recognized thatrevealing intelligence sources was extremely damaging. As for theTimes, he said, “Hopefully they’ll finally go bankrupt this year.”When another Internet user asked him if it was unethical to releasenational security secrets, he answered, “YEEEEEEEEEES.”As with every CIA officer, Snowden had to undergo a two- yearevaluation and take a routine polygraph test. It was then, in December2008, that his superior at the CIA placed a “derog” in his file, theCIA’s shorthand for a derogatory comment, in an unfavorable evaluation.The reason remains somewhat murky. According to a NewYork Times story by the veteran intelligence reporter Eric Schmitt,Snowden’s superior had suspected that Snowden “was trying tobreak into classified computer files to which he was not authorizedto have access.” Schmitt evidently had well- placed sources in theCIA. He said that he interviewed two senior American officials whowere familiar with the case. According to what they told Schmitt, theCIA superior had decided to “send Snowden home.” Officially, how-Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 259/29/16 5:51 PM26 | how america lost its secretsever, according to a reply by a CIA public affairs officer to the Times,Snowden had not been fired or accused of attempting to “break intoclassified computer files to which he did not have authorized access.”A former CIA officer who had also been at the U.S. missionin Geneva explained the discrepancy to me. He said that the spinthe CIA put on the story was “necessary containment.” After theSnowden breach occurred in June 2013, the CIA had a problem thatcould, as he put it, “blow up in its face.” If Snowden had been firedbut allowed to keep his security clearance in 2009, the CIA’s incompetencecould be partly blamed for the NSA’s subsequent employmentof him. If he had broken into a computer to which he was notauthorized, he should have been fired if not arrested.What this spin glossed over, according to this former CIA officer,is the part about Snowden’s behavior that concerned his superior.Technically, Snowden, as a CIA communications officer, was authorizedto use the computer system. The problem was that Snowdenhad deliberately misused it by adding code to it. This code could havecompromised the security of the CIA’s “live system.” So while whatthe CIA public affairs officer quoted in the Times story said was correct,it clouded the issue.During his time in Geneva, Snowden had received no promotionsor commendations for his work. He was threatened with a punitiveinvestigation unless he agreed to quietly resign from the CIA. “Itwas not a stellar career,” Drumheller, the former CIA station chief,told me in 2014.Snowden blamed his career- ending “derog” on an “e- mail spat”with a superior. From Moscow, he wrote to James Risen of the Timesthat his superior officer ordered him not “to rock the boat.” Further,he complained that the technical team at the CIA station in Genevahad “brushed him off,” even though he had a legitimate grievance.When he complained about a flaw in the computer system, he saidthat his superior took vengeance on him. He said he added the codeto the system to prove he was right. He attributed the “derog” inhis file to the incompetence, blindness, and errors of his superiors.According to Snowden, he was a victim. This would not be the lasttime he faulted superiors for their supposed incompetence. He wouldEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 269/29/16 5:51 PMSecret Agent | 27later say that the NSA experts who examined the documents that hehad stolen were “totally incapable.”In any case, in February 2009, Snowden not only had a careerdamaging“derog” in his file but faced an internal investigation ofhis suspicious computer activities. According to Drumheller, such aninternal investigation would not be undertaken lightly or because ofan “e- mail spat.” He said that such an investigation was “a big deal”involving the CIA Office of Security in Washington and possibly theFBI. It would also result in the temporary suspension of Snowden’ssecurity clearance. This left Snowden with little real choice. If hewanted to avoid that investigation, he had to resign from the CIA,which he did in February 2009. That was the end of the securityinvestigation.He was clearly bitter, posting on Ars Technica on January 10,2009, “Obama just appointed a fucking POLITICIAN to run theCIA!” (He was referring to Leon Panetta, President Clinton’s formerchief of staff.) Snowden attributed the origins of his antipathy toU.S. intelligence to his 2007– 9 experiences in the CIA. He later toldVanity Fair that the 2009 incident in the CIA convinced him thatworking “through the system would lead only to reprisals.”Snowden, if not yet a ticking time bomb, was certainly a disgruntledintelligence worker before he ever got to the NSA.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 279/29/16 5:51 PMchapter 3ContractorPrivate contractors don’t clear employees. The government does.— admiral michael mcconnell,former vice- chairman, Booz Allen HamiltonSnowden, aged twenty- five, returned from Europe and movedinto his mother’s condo. Not only was he unemployed now, havingresigned from the CIA, but his financial state had been hurtby the huge losses he had suffered playing the options market inGeneva and by the fact that he did not qualify for any CIA benefits.His vision of himself as a secret agent, the unstoppable WolfkingAwesomefox, might have also suffered. According to the narrativehe later supplied to The Guardian, he had become deeply concernedabout the immoral way in which the CIA conducted its intelligenceoperations in Switzerland.“Much of what I saw in Geneva really disillusioned me about howmy government functions and what its impact is in the world. I realizedthat I was part of something that was doing far more harm thangood,” Snowden told The Guardian. By way of example, he said helearned that the CIA had gotten a Swiss banker drunk enough to bearrested when he drove so the CIA could compromise him. Snowden,who did not drink himself, was appalled at this ploy. Despite hisEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 289/29/16 5:51 PMContractor | 29growing antagonism toward the U.S. government, he had not givenup on, if not becoming a secret agent, working in the netherworld ofsecret intelligence.There was still a back door through which he could reenter thespy world. Private corporations hired civilian technicians to workfor spy agencies as independent contractors. By 2009, the CIA, theNSA, and other U.S. intelligence services had outsourced much ofthe job of maintaining and upgrading their computer systems tothese private companies. They supplied the NSA with most of itssystem administrators and other information technology workers.This arrangement allowed the NSA to effectively bypass budgetlimits and other restrictions limiting how many NSA techniciansit could recruit. Instead of being on the NSA’s own payroll, thesepeople nominally worked for, and received their paychecks from,private employers. In fact, many of these outside contractors workedfull- time for the NSA.Snowden applied in April 2009 to one of these private companies,a subsidiary of the Dell computer company. To diversify out ofmanufacturing computers, Dell had recently gone into the businessof managing government computer systems for the NSA and otherintelligence services. As a leading specialist in the field of corporatecyber security, Dell had no problem obtaining sizable contracts fromthe NSA’s Technology Directorate. In 2008, the NSA had in effectoutsourced to Dell the task of reorganizing the backup systems at itsregional bases. Dell had to find thousands of independent contractorsto work at these bases. In 2009, it was seeking to fill positionsat the NSA’s regional base in Japan, and Snowden applied. Relocatingwould be no issue for him because he had a longtime interest ingoing to Japan.He had little problem obtaining the job. He had a single compellingqualification: like all other CIA officers, he had been given atop secret clearance. For an outside contractor such as Dell, such asecurity clearance was pure gold. If a potential recruit lacked it, Dellneeded to wait for a time- consuming background check that wouldhave to be conducted before it could deploy him or her at the NSA.If a recruit already had the clearance, as Snowden did, he could beginworking immediately.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 299/29/16 5:51 PM30 | how america lost its secretsSnowden still had his security clearance, despite his highly problematicexit from the CIA, because the agency had instituted a policya few years earlier that allowed voluntarily retiring CIA officers tokeep their clearance for two years after they left. This “free pass,” asone former CIA officer called the two- year grace period, had beenintended to make it easier for retiring officers to find jobs in parts ofthe defense industry. This accommodation, in turn, made it easier forthe CIA to downsize to meet its budget.Not only did Snowden retain his clearance, but unlike when hehad applied for his job at the CIA in 2006, he could now list on hisrésumé two years of experience in information technology andcyber security at the CIA. Dell could check only a single fact: thatSnowden was employed at the CIA between 2006 and 2009. His CIAfile, which contained the “derog,” was not available to Dell or anyother private company because of government privacy regulations.Even though the CIA had “security concerns” about Snowden, itcould not convey them to either Dell or the NSA without violatingthe privacy rules. “So the guy with whom the CIA had concerns leftthe Agency and joined the ranks of the many contractors workingin the intelligence community [IC] before CIA could inform the restof the IC about its worries,” Michael Morell, then CIA deputy director,explained. “He even got a pay raise.”Obviously, this was a glitch in the security system. As a result ofit, though, Snowden entered the secret world of the NSA only fivemonths after being forced out of the CIA.For the next forty- five months, Dell assigned him various IT tasksat the NSA. In June 2009, he was sent to Japan to work in the NSAcomplex at the U.S. Yokota Air Base, which is about two hours by carfrom downtown Tokyo. He moved into a small one- bedroom apartmentin Fussa, just outside the sprawling base.His initial job for Dell was teaching cyber security to army and airforce personnel. In this capacity, he instructed U.S. military officersstationed at the base in how to shield their computers from hackers.Such security training had been required for military personneldealing with classified material after several successful break- insto U.S. military networks by China, Russia, and other adversarynations. It was not a challenging or interesting job.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 309/29/16 5:51 PMContractor | 31But Snowden found diversions in Japan. In July 2009, LindsayMills joined him there. She had become an amateur photographer,specializing in arty self- portraits. She also saw herself as a globaltourist, writing in her blog after arriving in Japan that she had traveledto seventeen countries. Like Snowden, she also deemed herself,tongue in cheek, a “super hero.” In this sense, her Internet avatarwas a match for Snowden’s Wolfking Awesomefox.In Japan, Mills and Snowden spent time with another Americancouple, Jennie and Joseph Chamberlin, who also worked at theYokota base. Jennie, a sergeant in the public affairs section of the U.S.Air Force, had been at art college with Mills and called herself in herblog the Little Red Ninja. Joseph Chamberlin was a decorated U.S.Navy pilot who now flew highly sensitive intelligence- gatheringmissions from the Yokota base. Jennie described Lindsay in her blogas her “super- model friend.” The two couples also went on expeditionsin Japan together. As far as is known, the Chamberlins werethe only Americans at the base with whom Snowden socialized. OnAugust 17, 2009, the foursome attempted to walk up Mount Fuji,but they got lost en route and wound up in the Mount Fuji giftshop. Jennie described the misadventure in her blog: “Our adventurestarted off a little rocky with our attempts to find the interstate.Alas, our iconic mountain was obscured by cloud. A short stop atthe Mt. Fuji combination soba noodle stand/gift shop was enough towhet our appetite for the further exploration that is to come.” Photographstaken that day show Snowden wearing Hawaiian shortsand a black tank top emblazoned with an eagle and the letters USA.They also show Mills wearing safari shorts, a brown sweater, andwhat appears to be an engagement ring. “Ed was looking rather rednecky,”Lindsay commented on one photograph. Snowden describedher, in turn, as “nerdy.” They never made it to the top of Mount Fuji.Snowden also sought to advance himself by getting credit towarda college certificate by enrolling in a summer online course at theUniversity of Maryland’s Asia program, which had a regional campuson the Yokota base. Known as UMUC, it had a contract withthe government to provide military personnel with such educationalopportunities. Snowden would later claim that he was takingcourses for a graduate degree in computer sciences, but WilliamEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 319/29/16 5:51 PM32 | how america lost its secretsStevens, the assistant registrar of UMUC, who I spoke to at the basein 2016, told me that the program in 2009 did not provide graduatecourses in computer sciences. According to the program’s record,while Snowden had enrolled as a student in the summer of 2009, hereceived neither any credits nor a certificate.In October 2009, Dell assigned Snowden a job in which he haddirect access to the NSA’s computers. He was now a system administrator,which is essentially a tech- savvy repairman. Dell was workingon a backup system code- named EPICSHELTER. For this contract,Dell was transferring large chunks of data from the NSA’s maincomputers in Maryland to backup drives in Japan so that the systemcould be quickly restored if there was a communications interruption.Because most of the classified data was in its encrypted form, ithad little value to any outside party. Snowden’s job was to maintainthe proper functioning of computers, but as a system administratorhe also had privileges to call up unencrypted files. He sat in front of acomputer screen all day looking for any problems in the transferringof files to backup servers.The work was highly repetitive and exceedingly dull. Snowdenfound time to search for anomalies in the system, and he claimedto have spotted a major flaw in the security system in late 2009. Hediscovered that a rogue system administrator in Japan could stealsecret data without anyone else’s realizing that it had been stolen.Snowden brought that to the attention of his superiors, as he latersaid.The emergence of a rogue system administrator was not that farfetchedin 2009. Hacktivists such as Julian Assange had adopted thebattle cry “Sysadmins of the world, unite.” Instead of asking themto “throw off their chains,” as Marx did, he asked them to send classifieddocuments about secret government activity to the WikiLeakssite. Snowden, as a “sys admin,” was aware he had the power to doso. He recalled in Moscow in 2014, “I actually recommended they[the NSA] move to two- man control for administrative access backin 2009.” To make his point even clearer, he added, “A whistleblowercould use these things, but so could a spy.” Not without irony,Snowden became that rogue system administrator some three yearsEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 329/30/16 11:09 AMContractor | 33later. In fact, he later used the very vulnerability he pointed out tosteal NSA documents at Dell.In September 2009, still on the Dell payroll, Snowden made a tendaytrip to India. He later said he was on an official visit “workingat the US embassy.” Hotel records show that he arrived at the HyattRegency in New Delhi on September 2 from Japan and at 3:30 p.m.on September 3 checked into the Koenig Inn, an annex to KoenigSolutions, a school that gave crash courses on programming andcomputer hacking. According to Rohit Aggarwal, head of the school,Snowden stayed there until September 10 while taking classeswith a private instructor. It cost $2,000 in tuition and fees, whichSnowden prepaid from Japan with his personal credit card. Eventhough Snowden later said he only took courses in “programming,”the school’s records show that during that week he took intensivecourses in sophisticated hacking techniques. The course was titled“Ethical Hacking,” but that was a euphemism for teaching the techniquesof illicit hacking. The course provided tutoring on hackers’tools such as SpyEye and Zeus, which are used to circumvent securityprocedures. It also demonstrated how these hacking tools couldbe customized by criminals and spies to break into files, plant surveillanceprograms, impersonate system administrators, assume theprivileges of system administrators in a network, and capture thepasswords of others. On September 11, Snowden, according to hotelrecords, left India for Japan. While the stated purpose of the hackingtraining was to allow security consultants to detect intruders, it alsoprepared Snowden to be, if he chose to be, an intruder in the NSAsystem.One problem with working as a contractor is that the standardtwo- year contracts are not necessarily renewed. Nor is there muchpossibility for advancement for IT workers. As one contractortold me, “It is a dead- end job with great pay.” In the fall of 2010,Snowden’s contract in Japan with Dell was nearing an end.Dell offered Snowden, and he accepted, a new position in theUnited States. He rented a modest suburban house shaded by asakura cherry tree in a suburb of Annapolis, Maryland. LindsayMills meanwhile was attending a two- week fitness training course atEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 339/29/16 5:51 PM34 | how america lost its secretsa retreat that qualified her to be a yoga instructor. She had been livingon and off with Snowden during the previous two years abroad,including while he worked at the CIA in Switzerland and the NSA inJapan, and now she moved in with Snowden again. The twenty- fiveyear-old Mills posted on Instagram, “Finally in our first US placetogether.” She also put pictures online of him in bed with her, affectionatelyreferring to him in her posts as a “computer crusader.”He worked on problem solving for corporate clients at Dell headquartersin Annapolis. In preparation for his new corporate role,Snowden shaved off his facial hair and, with Lindsay’s help, bought aRalph Lauren suit. His corporate clients were assisting the NSA, theCIA, and the DIA. Consequently, Snowden dealt with a wide range ofintelligence officers and gave presentations on the vulnerabilities incomputer security at the DIA- sponsored Joint Counterintelligenceseminar. In February 2011, he attended a black tie Valentine’s Daygala sponsored by corporate members of the Armed Forces Communicationand Electronics Association. The guest speaker was MichaelHayden, who had headed the CIA when Snowden was abruptlyforced out two years earlier. Nevertheless, Snowden joined the cueto have his photo taken with the former director, a perk of the charityevent.These dealings in no way mitigated his resentment of the intelligenceestablishment. What began at the CIA in 2009 as objectionsto what he saw as the incompetence of his superiors grew into wellarticulateddisapproval of the way the U.S. government conductedits intelligence. He found NSA surveillance particularly worrisome,later telling The Guardian, “They [the NSA] are intent on makingevery conversation and every form of behavior in the world knownto them.” He claimed after defecting to Moscow that he had voicedhis concerns about what he considered illicit surveillance to ten NSAofficials, “none of whom took any action to address them.” The NSAcan find no record of these complaints, but if Snowden had indeedcomplained to these officials while working for Dell, his superiorsat Dell either didn’t notice or didn’t care that they had a very disgruntledemployee on their hands.Snowden also made no secret on the Internet of his anger at theU.S. government and the corporations that served it. He railed onEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 349/29/16 5:51 PMContractor | 35the Ars Technica site against the complicity of private corporations,such as Dell, that assisted the NSA. In his online posts in 2010,Snowden expressed loathing for the assistance that corporate Americawas providing the intelligence community. “It really concernsme how little this sort of corporate behavior bothers those outside oftechnology circles,” he wrote under his TrueHooHa alias. He said hefeared that America was already on “a slippery slope,” and he suggested,perhaps adumbrating his own later actions, that this corporateassistance to U.S. intelligence “was entirely within our controlto stop.”What the “computer crusader” expressed in these angry Internetpostings was an almost obsessive concern over individuals’ freelysubmitting to government authority. “Society really seems to havedeveloped an unquestioning obedience towards spooky types,” hewrote on Ars Technica without mentioning that he himself workedfor a corporation that assisted spy agencies. He asked rhetoricallyon this public forum whether the sinister slide toward a surveillancestate “sneaked in undetected because of pervasive governmentsecrecy.”The outright contempt he expressed toward this “governmentsecrecy” did not prevent him from seeking even more secret workat Dell for the intelligence services. In February 2011, after his CIAsecurity clearance ran out, he applied to renew it. The new clearancenow required a new background check and filling out the government’s127- page Standard Form 86.Since 1996, background investigations for the NSA, like much ofthe computer work at the NSA, had been outsourced to a privatecompany. It had proceeded from the effort of the Clinton administrationto cut the size of government by privatizing tasks that couldbe more efficiently done by for- profit companies. U.S. InvestigationsServices, or USIS, as it is now called, which won the contractfor background checks, was initially owned by the private equityfund Carlyle Group, which later sold it to another financial group,Providence Equity Partners. For the private equity and hedge funds,profits were the measure of success. To increase its profits from thecontract with the NSA, USIS had to move more quickly in concludingbackground checks because it did not get paid more for extensiveEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 359/29/16 5:51 PM36 | how america lost its secretsinvestigation. In 2006, the government learned these backgroundchecks were often prematurely ended. In Snowden’s case, becausethe CIA did not share its files with a private concern, USIS did nothave access to Snowden’s CIA files, and it therefore did not learnabout the threatened security investigation. Nor did it learn fromthe Internet, where he always employed an alias, that he was a disgruntledemployee. So Snowden’s new clearance was approved inthe summer of 2011, allowing him to continue working for Dell onsecret intelligence projects.Meanwhile, in August 2011, Mills began her own blog titledL’s Journey. In it, she described herself as “a world- traveling poledancingsuper hero.” Many of her posted pictures were provocativeposes of herself in her underwear and various states of undress. Shewrote, “I’ve always wanted to be splashed on the cover of magazines,with my best air- brushed look.” Her wish would be gratified twoyears later in a way she likely did not anticipate.For his part, Snowden seemed happy to encourage her fantasyabout being a superhero. He even gave her a Star Trek– inspired headvisor. Despite all the concerns he voiced about privacy, he did notseem to mind her provocative posts. On the contrary, he took photographsof her, telling her at one point that her photographs werenot “sexy” enough.Snowden was soon offered a new position by Dell at the NSA’sKunia regional base in Hawaii. Dell, which was in the process ofexpanding its government consulting business, wanted him to be asystem administrator on the NSA’s backup system. The NSA neededthis system before it could upgrade new security protocols thatwould audit suspicious activity in real time. In Hawaii, as in Japan,system administrators still worked alone. Snowden knew from hisexperience in Japan that this solo work in an unaudited workplaceprovided an opportunity for a system administrator to steal documents.So he might also have realized that as a solo system administratorin Hawaii, he would have this opportunity. Whether thiswas on his mind or not, on March 15, 2012, he accepted this offer.Dell agreed to pay all his relocation expenses and provide him witha housing allowance.He found a 1,559- square- foot house in Oahu, located at 94- 1044Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 369/29/16 5:51 PMContractor | 37Eleu Street in the middle- class suburb of Waipahu. It was part ofthe Royal Kunia development, which contained three hundredsimilar- looking homes. According to Albi Matco, the manager of thecommunity association for the development, many of the residentsworked at military facilities in the area. The corner house Snowdenrented was comfortable enough, with three bedrooms, a walk- incloset, a living room with a high ceiling, and a single- car garage, butin no way lavish. It did not even have a backyard. He moved in onApril 2, 2012, which entailed a brief separation from his girlfriend,Mills, who had committed herself to attending a girlfriend’s weddingthe following month. After he left for his new assignment, she wroteon Instagram, “Sex toy party and then saying goodbye to my man—well not goodbye so much as see you in two months.”Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 379/29/16 5:51 PMchapter 4ThiefWe begin by coveting what we see every day.— hannibal lecter, The Silence of the LambsIn hawaii in 2012, Snowden was living a very comfortable life.He was earning just over $120,000 a year from Dell. His housingallowance covered the rent and the lease on his car. He workedfive days a week at the NSA base. The commute, as I timed it, tookonly ten minutes. Driving past a sign marked “Restricted Area: KeepOut,” and the security booth where NSA guards checked his credentials,he left his car in the outdoor lot for the Kunia RegionalSecurity Operations Center. (When I drove into the base in 2016,I was detained nearly two hours at the security booth before beingturned back.)Snowden worked in a three-story reinforced concrete buildingcalled “the tunnel,” even though it was above the ground. It hadbeen built during World War II to serve as an aircraft assemblyplant. During the war, it was entirely covered with earth and shrubberyto proof it against Japanese bomber attacks. In 1980, the NSAconverted it to its regional base in Hawaii for its intelligence gather-Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 389/29/16 5:51 PMThief | 39ing. Its lack of windows and the dirt covering gave it the appearance,when I viewed it in 2016, of an oblong-shaped anthill. Workers, bothmilitary and civilian, entered through an exterior staircase in thecenter of the mound. Even though it is above the ground, it is knownas the tunnel. Snowden said in describing the atmosphere, “You’re ina vaulted space. Everybody has sort of similar clearances, everybodyknows everybody. It’s a small world.” He said that to relieve thetediousness of the work, every two months or so his fellow workerswould circulate a picture of a naked person that showed up ontheir screens as part of the NSA’s surveillance of foreign suspects. Heexplained, “You’ve got young enlisted guys, 18 to 22 years old [whohave] suddenly been thrust into a position of extraordinary responsibilitywhere they now have access to all of your private records. Inthe course of their daily work they stumble across . . . an intimatenude photo of someone in a sexually compromising position.”He knew that copying any files, including photographs, was a violationof NSA rules. But he did not report this illicit activity to theNSA, even though he later claimed that it occurred regularly. Hejoked in his Moscow interview with The Guardian that some of thenudes were “extremely attractive” and that viewing them was, as heput it, “the fringe benefits of surveillance positions.”Snowden identified with the Libertarian Party, and at the NSAhe made no effort to conceal his political support of its causes. Hebecame an active partisan of Congressman Ron Paul, the leading figurein the party in 2012. “He’s so dreamy,” Snowden posted on theArs Technica site in March 2009 (just after he registered to vote inNorth Carolina, though he no longer lived there). Paul was runningin the 2012 Republican presidential primaries, and Snowden madea contribution of $500 to his election committee. Snowden’s attractionto Paul’s libertarian ideology was not that surprising. At thecore of Paul’s worldview was a deep hostility to the intrusion of thegovernment into private lives. Snowden shared this hostility, as wasclear from his Internet postings. Like other Libertarians, Snowdenbelieved that citizens should not be “shackled” by federal law. Helater addressed from Moscow via an Internet hookup a libertariangathering at which Ron Paul also spoke. “Law is a lot like medi-Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 399/29/16 5:51 PM40 | how america lost its secretscine,” he said. “When you have too much it can be fatal.” Like Paul,Snowden ardently opposed any form of gun control, as did LindsayMills in her online postings.Like other Libertarians, Snowden, a contractor for the government,saw the government as an adversary. “The [American] government,”he later said, “assumed upon itself, in secret, new executive powerswithout any public awareness or any public consent and used themagainst the citizenry of its own country to increase its own power,to increase its own awareness.” Most relevant to his future activitiesat the NSA, Snowden wholeheartedly agreed with Paul’s positionon the dangers inherent in government surveillance of U.S. citizens.Paul described the CIA, the organization that had forced Snowdenout, as nothing short of a “secret government” and said that “in atrue Republic, there is no place for an organization like the CIA.” Healso railed against NSA surveillance.As is clear from Snowden’s Internet postings, he, like Ron Paul,had doubts about the competence of the intelligence agencies of theU.S. government. Snowden’s own disillusionment about the governmentmight have begun with his rejection and perceived mistreatmentby the Special Forces of the U.S. Army. It was almost certainlyreinforced by his ouster from the CIA. He later told The Guardianthat he was disillusioned as early as 2007 when he learned about theCIA’s methods in compromising Swiss citizens. His critical view ofthe U.S. government only hardened during the years he worked atthe NSA. He described his NSA superiors as “grossly incompetent,”as he later explained to a journalist from Wired magazine in Moscow.At the NSA, he said employees were kept in line by “fear anda false image of patriotism.” He said that he saw his fellow workerscowed into “obedience to authority” and his superiors induced tobreak the law. He became particularly concerned with what he calledthe “secret powers” of the NSA. He saw them as “tremendouslydangerous.” By this time, Snowden was fully aware that the NSAconducted domestic surveillance because he had used his privilegesas a system administrator in 2012 to read the NSA inspector general’sreport on a 2009 surveillance program.Nevertheless, Snowden continued to work at the NSA, where hewas, as he put it, “making a ton of money.” Mills joined him in hisEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 409/29/16 5:51 PMThief | 41“paradise” in June 2012, shortly before his twenty- ninth birthday.Just before leaving Annapolis for Hawaii, Mills posted a seminudepicture of herself on her blog, L’s Journey. In it, her face was coveredwith a blanket. The caption under it read, “Trying to avoid thechanges coming my way.” In Honolulu, she found “E.,” as she calledSnowden in her blog, “elusive.” She found that he preferred to stayat home and avoided meeting other people to the point that herfriends “were not quite sure that E. existed.” Lindsay’s fellow performersin the Waikiki Acrobatic Troupe told me in 2016 that theyrarely, if ever, saw Snowden at the practice sessions. Andrew Towl,a juggler with the group, did briefly meet Snowden once. It was ona hike with Lindsay in Oahu. Towl said he asked Snowden what hewas doing in Hawaii and Snowden answered tersely, “I work withcomputers,” and continued walking. Even though Mills had datedSnowden for eight years, most of her other friends, except for Jennieand Joe Chamberlin in Japan, had not met him. Next door neighborsI spoke to caught brief glimpses of him entering or leaving hishouse but did not engage him in a conversation as Snowden tendedto avoid eye contact. If he had other social interactions in Hawaii, noone he met came forward and spoke of meeting him, even after hebecame world famous.Two days after his twenty- ninth birthday dinner on June 21, Millsdescribed him playfully as a “goof.” She wrote in her blog, “Theuniverse is telling me something and I’m pretty sure it’s saying getout, Fuck you Hawaii.” In early July, she summed up her shaky situationwith Snowden in another blog, writing, “I moved to Hawaiito continue my relationship with E. [but] it has been an emotionalroller coaster since I stepped off the plane.” She diverted herself byorganizing a pole- dancing studio in the four- hundred- square- footgarage of the house. She also found her own friends in physical fitnessand dance groups. She joined a New Age yoga studio calledPhysical Phatness, as well as a local acrobatic performance group,and, on Friday nights, pole danced at the Mercury lounge in downtownHonolulu. Unlike Snowden, she enjoyed socializing, writing inher blog, “We lovingly crammed a large group into a small cornerof a delicious Japanese restaurant and filled our bellies with sushi,tempura, and good conversation.”Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 419/29/16 5:51 PM42 | how america lost its secretsThat same July, Snowden had other things on his mind, includingan attempt to advance himself. Although his position at Dell asa system administrator was a well- compensated one, especially fora twenty- nine- year- old with no formal education, it carried littleprestige. He sat from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. in a windowless roomwatching a bank of monitors in the so- called tunnel. Many of thosewho worked with him were, as he described them, “eighteen year oldsoldiers.” Presumably, they had little interest in discussing with himthe weightier issues of the world. Working as an outside contractorwas also a dead- end job that hardly matched the vision he had ofhimself in his Internet postings. In real life, in a cubicle in the NSA,he was decidedly not the Wolfking Awesomefox heroic image he hadof himself in his dream vision.Snowden now decided to apply for a position in the NSA itself.He apparently believed that if he scored high enough on its entranceexam, the NSA would invite him to join it as a Senior ExecutiveService officer, or SES, which was the civilian equivalent in rank andpay to a flag officer in the U.S. armed forces. “I’m still amazed thata twenty-eight-year-old thought he could get an SES position,” acivilian contractor working for the NSA during the same period toldme, “Snowden had a very overinflated view of his self-worth.” Toenhance his chances of getting the SES job, Snowden in the summerof 2012 illicitly hacked into the NSA’s administrative files and stolethe answers to the NSA exam. As the NSA’s subsequent postmortemwould determine, it was the first known document that Snowdentook without authorization at the NSA.It was not the first time, however, that he had used his hackingskills to attempt to advance himself. At the CIA in 2009, as he latersaid in Moscow, he had added text to his annual CIA evaluation inwhat he termed “a non- malicious way” to prove a point. His CIAsuperior took a much darker view of that incident when the hackwas detected, calling for an investigation. It was the threat of thatinvestigation that, it will be recalled, in effect ended Snowden’s CIAcareer. At the NSA, his intrusion was not detected for almost a year.“He stole the [NSA] test with the answers, and he took the test andhe aced it,” the former NSA director Michael McConnell recountedEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 429/29/16 5:51 PMThief | 43in a 2013 interview. “He then walked into the NSA and said youshould hire me because I am this good on the test.”The reason why he attempted to gain entry into the upper ranksof the NSA in the late summer of 2012 is less clear. If his Internetposting and libertarian riffs are an indication of his state of mindthen, he was hostile to the surveillance activities of the NSA. If so, itmade little sense that he would seek a permanent career there. If thisis considered in light of the career move he made six months later(in March 2013), which, as he himself admits, was for the expresspurpose of getting at tightly held documents stored on computersthat were not available to him in his job at Dell, then he might havebeen seeking wider access in 2012 for a more nefarious purpose thanan NSA job.In any case, despite the near- perfect scores, the NSA did not offerhim a Senior Executive Service job. “It was totally unrealistic forSnowden to expect to get an SES position,” a former senior NSAofficer told me. Snowden’s ambitions might have been disappointedin this instance, but it did not prevent him from later claiming thathe had been a senior adviser to the CIA and also a senior adviser tothe Defense Intelligence Agency.Instead of an SES position, the NSA offered him a lowly G- 13 jobas an information technology worker, which was not an improvementon his job at Dell. He took this slight as evidence of the NSA’sincompetence, subsequently joking to a reporter in Moscow that hisability to steal the test answers should have been seen as a qualificationfor the NSA job. In September 2012, he turned down the NSAoffer. If he was to advance himself now, he had to find a new way.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 439/29/16 5:51 PMchapter 5Crossing the RubiconWhat I came to feel is that a regime that is described as a nationalsecurity agency has stopped representing the public interest andhas instead begun to protect and promote state security interests.— edward snowden, Moscow, 2014Soon after Snowden failed to get an SES job at the NSA in September2012, he intensified his rogue activities. As we’ve seen,part of Snowden’s job as a system administrator under contract toDell was transferring files held at Fort Meade to backup computersin Hawaii. He “was moving copies of that data there for them,” saidDeputy Director Ledgett, “which was perfect cover for stealing the[NSA] data” through the fall and winter of 2012. The security measuresat the Hawaii base presented no obstacles to him because, asa system administrator, he had privileges that allowed him to copydocuments that had not been encrypted. Indeed, it was part of theprocess of building the backup system. The flaw he had pointed toin Japan, in which system administrators working solo could safelysteal files, also existed in Hawaii, as we know. This time, however,instead of bringing it to the attention of the NSA, he used it to stealfiles.Snowden could be confident that his thefts of documents wouldgo undetected. Real- time auditing of the movement of documents,Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 449/29/16 5:51 PMCrossing the Rubicon | 45which was done at NSA headquarters in Fort Meade and most of theNSA’s regional facilities, had not yet been installed at the Hawaiibase, because a lack of bandwidth prevented the safe upgrading ofthe software. This auditing software was scheduled to be installedafter the backup system was completed in 2013. The Kunia base wasone of the last NSA bases that did not monitor suspicious transfersof files on a real- time basis. Snowden was aware of this deficiency;he later pointed out in his interview in Wired that the NSA basewhere he worked did not have an “audit” mechanism. This securitygap allowed Snowden, using his system administrator’s credentials,to copy classified data to a thumb drive without anyone’s being ableto trace the copied data back to him. According to the NSA’s subsequentdamage assessment, he stole many thousands of pages whileworking for Dell in 2012 before he contacted journalists. Ledgettsubsequently reported that the NSA analysis of the fifty- eight thousanddocuments that were given by Snowden to journalists in June2013 showed that most of them were taken while he was still workingat Dell.This theft was made even more serious by the interconnectionof NSA computers with those of other intelligence agencies. Priorto the 9/11 attacks in 2001, “stovepiping” had protected NSA dataon its computers from networks used by other intelligence services.After the 9/11 Commission concluded that part of the reason U.S.intelligence agencies were unable to “connect the dots” in advance ofthe attack was related to this practice, the NSA stripped away a largepart of its stovepiping. As a result, the NSANet, which Snowdenhad access to at Dell in 2012, became a shared network with “commonaccess points,” as the former NSA director Michael Haydendescribed them to me, which made them the equivalent of “readingrooms” in a library. They served as a means for NSA workers toexchange ideas about the problems they were encountering on variousprojects for the intelligence community. In maintaining them,system administrators, or “system admins,” like Snowden, acted asthe “librarians.” If a system administrator copied data from this network,no one knew.For Snowden, the NSANet, which included CIA and DefenseDepartment documents, provided a rich hunting ground in the fallEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 459/29/16 5:51 PM46 | how america lost its secretsand winter of 2012. Many of the documents he took off the NSANetrevealed operations not only of the NSA but also of the CIA and thePentagon. By taking them, he had come to a Rubicon from whichthere would be no return. He later explained in an e- mail to VanityFair from Moscow, “I crossed that line.”As far as is known, Snowden was not sharing documents with anyother party prior to May 2013. He was not even yet in contact withPoitras, Greenwald, or any other journalists. Presumably, Snowdenwas collecting them on drives— despite the risks that possessingsuch a collection of secrets might entail— for some future use.Why would Snowden jeopardize his career and, if caught, his freedomby undertaking this illicit enterprise? He might by now havehad strong ideological objections to the NSA’s global surveillance. Ashe said later in Moscow, “We’re subverting our security standardsfor the sake of surveillance.” Ordinarily, though, even ideologicallyopposed employees don’t steal state secrets and risk imprisonment.If they are disgruntled, they seek employment elsewhere. Certainly,Snowden, with his three years’ experience working for Dell, wouldhave little problem finding a job as an IT worker in the boomingcivilian sector of computer technology. Instead, he sought to widenhis access to NSA documents. This behavior suggests that he mighthave had another agenda. One possible clue to it is the first documenthe took: the NSA exam. The answers to the questions in itrepresented to him a form of tactical power. Those answers couldempower him to obtain a more important job in the NSA itself thatwould allow him to burrow deeper into the executive structure ofthe agency. Holding such a job would unlock the door to documentscontaining the NSA’s sources stored in areas not available to Dellcontractors like himself.His later actions demonstrated that he equated the possession ofsuch secrets with personal power. For example, after he arrived inMoscow in 2013, he bragged to James Risen of the Times that hehad access to secrets that gave him great leverage over the NSA. Hetold him specifically his access to “full lists” of the NSA’s agents andoperations in adversary countries could, if revealed, close down theNSA’s capabilities to gather information in them.Such a fascination with the power of government- held secretsEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 469/29/16 5:51 PMCrossing the Rubicon | 47has always been a core concern of radical Libertarians. In his 1956book, The Torment of Secrecy: The Background and Consequences ofAmerican Security Policies, the sociologist Edward Shils brilliantlydissects the fascination with secrecy among individuals who fear thatgovernment agencies will use covert machinations against them. InShils’s concept, this counterculture is “tormented” by the government’spossession of knowledge unavailable to them. Members ofthis culture tend to believe that the agencies that hold these secrets,such as the FBI, the CIA, and the NSA, can control their lives; theyalso believe that obtaining such secrets will give individuals powerover government.Snowden himself was concerned with a coming “dark future,”which he later described as follows: “[The elites] know everythingabout us and we know nothing about them— because they are secret,they are privileged, and they are a separate class . . . the elite class,the political class, the resource class— we don’t know where theylive, we don’t know what they do, we don’t know who their friendsare. They have the ability to know all that about us. This is the directionof the future but I think there are changing possibilities in this.”To change the “dark future,” someone would have to know thesecrets of the “elites.” Snowden saw himself as one of the few individualsin a position to seize state secrets from those elites. He hada SCI (sensitive compartmented information) clearance, a pass intoan NSA regional base, and the privileges of a system administrator.This position allowed him to steal state secrets and whatever powerthat went with them. And if he moved to a position that gave himgreater access, he would, in this view, amass even greater power.Whatever his actual agenda in 2012, we know that he tested possiblereactions to a leak exposing NSA surveillance in the UnitedStates. He asked fellow workers at the NSA base in 2012, accordingto his own account, “What do you think the public would do if this[secret data] was on the front page?” He asked this question at a timewhen a large number of State Department and U.S. Army classifieddocuments had been posted on Julian Assange’s WikiLeaks website.These WikiLeaks revelations made, as Snowden knew they would,front- page headlines. His “question” was only rhetorical. No covertNSA document had ever been published in the press as of 2012. OneEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 479/29/16 5:51 PM48 | how america lost its secretsreason why NSA documents remained secrets, as all intelligenceworkers at Dell were told when they signed their oath to protectNSA secrets, was that the unauthorized release of communicationsintelligence documents would violate U.S. espionage laws. Even so,there was no shortage of activists overseas, such as Assange, whowould be willing to publish NSA documents revealing its global surveillanceactivities. Cyberpunks, as these activists called themselves,tended to be hostile to the NSA because they believed (correctly)that it monitored their activities on the Internet. This anti- NSAview was well represented at the Chaos Computer Club conventionin Berlin in 2012. In addressing these cyberpunks, Assange and hisfollowers at WikiLeaks declared that the main enemy in cyberspacewas the NSA. The NSA documents Snowden had taken were farmore explosive than anything Assange had posted to date becausethey contained NSA intelligence source material.In the late fall of 2012, Snowden further tested his newly foundpowers. Using an alias, he reached out to some of the leading hacktivists.It opened a door for him to the darker side of cyberspace.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 489/29/16 5:51 PMchapter 6HacktivistWhen you gaze long into an abyss, the abyss gazes into you.— friedrich nietzscheBy the time that Snowden had begun hacking into NSA filesin 2012, the alienated hacktivist battling to unlock the secretsof evil corporations and governments had become a stock hero ofpopular culture. For example, in the international best- selling Girlwith the Dragon Tattoo Trilogy by Stieg Larsson, the heroine, aself- educated hacker in her twenties named Lisbeth Salander, stealsincriminating documents from computers that provide the journalistMikael Blomkvist with scoops that save from bankruptcy the progressivemagazine he edits. The journalists at the magazine accepther sociopathic behavior, which includes embezzling millions of dollars,extortion, maiming, and murder, because her hacking exposescrimes and abuses of power. In the real- world universe, hacktivistsalso use their skills to attempt to redress perceived abuses of power.For example, in December 2010, the group Anonymous, whosemembers, called Anons, often wear Guy Fawkes masks resemblingthose worn in the 2006 movie V for Vendetta, launched a successfuldenial- of- service attack called Operation Avenge Assange. It wasEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 499/29/16 5:51 PM50 | how america lost its secretsaimed at paralyzing companies, including PayPal and MasterCard,that refused to process donations for WikiLeaks, which these Anonsbelieved were stifling the freedom of the Internet. Because hacktivistsoften use illicit means to redress their grievances, such as denialof-service attacks, theft of passwords, and hacking into computers,they must conceal their true identities to avoid the retribution ofthe FBI and other law enforcement agencies. This requires them tooperate on the dark side of cyberspace, which has become known asthe dark net. Fortunately for hacktivists, the dark net is accessible toanyone.It is a place frequented by those who want to avoid laws, regulations,and government surveillance. Its denizens include cyber saboteurs,industrial spies, purveyors of illegal contraband, spammers,pranksters, identity thieves, video pirates, bullies, slanderers, drugdealers, child pornographers, money launderers, contract killers,inside traders, anarchists, terrorists, and the intelligence services ofmany countries.Sue Halpern, writing about it in The New York Review of Books,noted, “My own forays to the dark Net include visits to sites offeringcounterfeit drivers’ licenses, methamphetamine, a template fora US twenty- dollar bill, files to make a 3D- printed gun, and booksdescribing how to receive illegal goods in the mail without gettingcaught. There were, too, links to rape and child abuse videos.”To operate effectively on the dark net, one often needs a maskof anonymity. But it is not easy to completely hide one’s tracksin cyberspace. The way that the Internet ordinarily works is thatwhenever an individual sends e- mails or instant messages or visitsa website, his or her identity can be referenced by the IP addressassigned to him or her by the Internet service provider. If dark netusers’ IP addresses are discoverable, they obviously cannot remainanonymous. So, to evade this built- in Internet transparency, darkside users have come to rely on ingenious software to hide theirIP addresses. The most commonly used software for this purposeis Tor, which was first called the Onion Router, because it moves IPaddresses through multiple layers. Tor software hides the IP addressby routing messages through a network of Tor- enabled relay stations,called nodes. Each node further obscures the user’s IP, evenEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 509/29/16 5:51 PMHacktivist | 51from the next node in the network. This scrambling allows messagesto exit the chain of Tor nodes without an easily discoverable IP. Bydoing so, it “anomizes” each user of the dark side.Because of the anonymity it provides, Tor became the software ofchoice for individuals and organizations who wanted to hide theiridentities. For example, Tor software made possible Silk Road, whichacted as an exchange for drug dealers, assassins, safecrackers, andprostitutes until it was closed down by the FBI in 2013. It was createdby Ross Ulbricht, a Libertarian who wore a Ron Paul T- shirt,as a website where “people could buy anything anonymously, withno trail whatsoever that led back to them.” (Ulbricht received a lifesentence for running this criminal enterprise in May 2015.)Tor software was also employed by Private Bradley Manning(now Chelsea Manning) to transfer some fifty thousand diplomaticcables and military reports from his laptop to Assange’s WikiLeakswebsite. Eventually, Manning was identified by a fellow hacker, convictedby a military court for violations of the Espionage Act, andsentenced to thirty- five years in prison. Tor enabled WikiLeaks topublish other secret data, such as material acquired in the theft ofSony’s files, allegedly by the North Korean intelligence service, in2015. It was the means for guaranteeing anonymity to the IT workerswho responded to Assange’s by now famous clarion call to unite.It allowed system administrators who opposed the “surveillancestate,” as well as other disgruntled employees of government agenciesor corporations, to send documents they copied to the WikiLeakswebsite without revealing their IP addresses.Because WikiLeaks did not know the identity of its sources, itcould not be legally compelled to reveal them. “Tor’s importanceto WikiLeaks cannot be overstated,” Assange said in an interviewwith Rolling Stone in 2012. Indeed, without the anonymity providedby its Tor software, WikiLeaks could not have easily entered into adocument- sharing arrangement with major newspapers, includingThe Guardian, The New York Times, Der Spiegel, Le Monde, and ElPaís. Through the magic of Tor, these newspapers simply attributetheir sources to WikiLeaks, which, in turn, made Assange a majorforce in international journalism.Ironically, Tor was a creation of U.S. intelligence. In the early yearsEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 519/29/16 5:51 PM52 | how america lost its secretsof the twenty- first century, the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory andthe Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency developed it toallow American intelligence operatives to cloak their movements onthe Internet. They could anonymously manipulate websites operatedby Islamic radicals, for example, and create their own Trojanhorse sites to lure would- be terrorists and spies. As it turned out,that use of Tor software had a conceptual flaw. If U.S. intelligenceservices used it, the targets could figure out that anyone visiting asite without an IP address was using Tor software to hide it. If Torwas exclusively used by U.S. intelligence services, the targets couldfurther deduce that all the anonymous visitors were avatars forAmerican intelligence. It would be analogous to undercover policeusing pink- colored cars that civilians did not use.To remedy this flaw, the U.S. government made Tor software opensource in 2008 and freely available to everyone in the world. It evenprovided funding for its promulgation, with the State Department,the National Science Foundation, and the Broadcasting Board ofGovernors financing Tor’s core developer. The public rationale forthis generosity was that Tor could serve as a tool for, as the StateDepartment called it, “democracy advocates in authoritarian states.”While Tor software remained a useful tool in covert operations bythe CIA, the DIA, and the FBI, it was anathema to the NSA becauseit made it more difficult for it to track potential targets.As Tor software became widely used by adversaries (as well ascommon criminals), the NSA sought to find vulnerabilities in it. “Itshould hardly be surprising that our intelligence agencies seek waysto counteract targets that use Tor software to hide their communications,”explained an NSA spokesperson. The NSA’s adversaries alsotook an interest in identifying Tor users because they might includepolitical dissidents and potential spies.Tor software also took on a cultlike importance to hacktivists concernedwith the U.S. government’s tracking their activities. CatherineA. Fitzpatrick provides an illuminating insight into the mind- set ofthese hacktivists in her 2014 book, Privacy for Me and Not for Thee.She describes them as largely “radical anarchists” who believe “thestate is all- powerful, that law- enforcement is so strong that it willprevail anyway, and that they are a persecuted minority.” As a refugeEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 529/29/16 5:51 PMHacktivist | 53against the surveillance of the state, and in particular the NSA, theynot only attempt to hide their own identities but also use encryptionto obscure their messages. Their goal is to free their movements “ofany interference from law- enforcement.” In this mind- set, accordingto Fitzpatrick, “they believe government intelligence agencieswill stop at nothing to stop them from absolute encryption.”Tor software was a means to defeat the NSA, but for it to be successful,there needed to be such a proliferation of Tor servers thatthe NSA could not piece together IP addresses. The problem was thatthe Tor Project, as they called it, was still a very tiny operation in2012. It employed fewer than a hundred core developers, who werelocated mainly in Germany, Iceland, Japan, Estonia, and the UnitedStates. Its staff worked mainly out of a single room in Cambridge,Massachusetts.The guiding spirit behind the Tor movement in the private sectorwas Jacob Appelbaum, a charismatic twenty- eight- year- old who hadgrown up in Northern California. Like Snowden, he had droppedout of high school. Appelbaum identified himself to his followers onthe Internet as a “hacktivist” battling state surveillance. For him, asfor many in the hacktivist culture, the main enemy was the NSA.After all, the NSA had a vast army of computer scientists workingto defeat Tor software. Appelbaum was well connected in this culture,having been the North American representative for WikiLeaksbefore he moved to Berlin in 2013. He also managed WikiLeaks’scyber security when it released the classified documents it obtainedfrom Manning in 2010. He was so well regarded among hacktiviststhat Assange chose him as his keynote speaker replacement atthe Hackers on Planet Earth (HOPE) convention in New York City.Assange told Rolling Stone, “Jake [Appelbaum] has been a tirelesspromoter behind the scenes of our cause.” For its part, Rolling Stonetitled its profile of Appelbaum “Meet the Most Dangerous Man inCyberspace.” (Assange needed a replacement for this particular eventbecause he feared if he came to New York, he would be arrested forreleasing the Manning files on WikiLeaks.)In Berlin, Appelbaum went to extreme lengths to protect himselffrom American surveillance. For example, when George Packerinterviewed him for The New Yorker in 2014, he insisted on meet-Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 539/29/16 5:51 PM54 | how america lost its secretsing with Packer naked in a sauna so he could be sure Packer did nothave a recording device (other than his notebook). Appelbaum statedrepeatedly in interviews that he was being spied upon by America.While his claims might have sounded paranoid to his interviewers,as a character in Joseph Heller’s Catch- 22 famously said, “Justbecause you’re paranoid doesn’t mean they aren’t after you.”Runa Sandvik, a close associate of Appelbaum’s, also workedtirelessly to extend Tor’s cloak of anonymity in the private sectoragainst the surveillance of the NSA and other would- be intrudersof privacy. A Norwegian national in her mid- twenties, she wrote awell- followed blog on Internet privacy for Forbes in 2012, in whichshe identified herself as a privacy and security researcher workingat the intersection of technology, law, and policy. Appelbaum andSandvik both came in contact with Snowden before he went publicand while he was still working for the NSA in Hawaii.In 2012, Snowden become involved in the effort to encouragethe use of Tor software to protect privacy. He made no secret of hisconcerns about electronic interceptions. According to an anonymousco- worker, he even wore a jacket to work with a parody of theNSA insignia, which, instead of merely depicting the NSA eagle,showed the eagle clutching AT&T phone lines. He had also becomea member of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the digital rightsorganization that was helping finance Tor. He saw Tor software as aremedy. “Without Tor,” he later wrote, “when you walk the streetsof the Internet, you’re always watched.” His efforts on behalf of Torwere not limited to symbolic gestures. In 2012, he set up a twogigabyteserver called “The Signal,” which he described as the largestTor relay station exit node in Honolulu. He apparently paid forit himself.Through his work as a system administrator for Dell, he founddocuments revealing NSA efforts, not yet successful, to defeat Tor’sability to camouflage a user’s identity on the Internet. He found thatthe NSA was attempting to build backdoor entry ways into Tor software.One of the NSA documents that he illicitly downloaded, titled“Tor Stinks,” described the agency’s continuing efforts to penetrateTor servers. In addition, he downloaded NSA documents describingprograms begun in 2012 that aimed at searching the Internet for theEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 549/29/16 5:51 PMHacktivist | 55cyber signatures of foreign parties suspected of hacking into U.S.government systems.He also made efforts to directly contact Sandvik. She recallsfirst hearing from Snowden in November 2012. He first wrote toher under the alias Cincinnatus but later supplied his real nameand mailing address in Hawaii because he wanted her to mail himauthentic computer stickers from the Tor Project that he could useas “swag,” as he wrote her, to attract further interest in Tor softwarein Hawaii. As a result, she knew his identity seven months before hewent public in Hong Kong. He would later tell Sandvik from Moscowthat he had been “moonlighting” by working to advance the TorProject. He added, with some understatement, that his moonlightingwas “something the NSA might not have been too happy about.”On November 18, 2012, while still working for Dell at the NSA,his dual role led him to begin organizing a “CryptoParty” aimed atfinding new recruits for Tor. The CryptoParty movement had beenstarted in 2012 by Asher Wolf, a radical hacktivist and anarchist livingin Melbourne, Australia. She promoted the get- togethers notunlike the Tupperware parties of the 1950s. The party organizer,usually with a representative of the Tor Project, advertised the partyon the Internet. Attendees were encouraged to bring their own laptopsso they could install Tor as well as encryption software in them.The attendees would then be instructed on how to use it. Finally,those converted to Tor software would be told to proselytize aboutits virtues by holding their own CryptoParty. Wolf’s idea was to usethese gatherings to expand the realm of Tor.Snowden called his fete the Oahu CryptoParty. It had its own webpage. He told Wolf that it would be the first CryptoParty in Honolulu.She wrote back advising him to “keep it simple.” (Wolf latersaid she did not know he was working at the NSA.)Snowden apparently had no inhibitions in staging a party that theleadership of the NSA might consider subversive of its battle againstTor. He even invited fellow NSA workers in Hawaii, as well as othersin the local computer culture. He asked Sandvik, who was living inWashington, D.C., at the time, to participate, proposing that she cohostthe party with him. He scheduled it for December 11, 2012, inHonolulu. According to Sandvik’s account, Snowden informed herEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 559/29/16 5:51 PM56 | how america lost its secretsthat he “had been talking some of the more technical guys at workinto setting up some additional fast servers” for Tor. His “work”place at the time was the NSA. So, if he was telling the truth, hehad already attempted to find co- workers at the NSA who might beinterested in attending an anti- NSA surveillance presentation.Sandvik not only agreed to be Snowden’s co- presenter but madethe Oahu CryptoParty a Tor- sponsored event. Sandvik flew toHonolulu on December 6, 2012. It was a fourteen- hour flight anda relatively expensive one. She later told Wired magazine that theinvitation from Snowden coincided with her plan to take a “vacationin Hawaii.” Whatever her reason, it brought her in direct contactwith a Tor supporter with access to the computers of its main enemy,the NSA.On December 11, following Snowden’s instructions, Sandvikarrived shortly before 6:00 p.m. at the Fishcake gallery in downtownHonolulu. She proceeded through a maze of furniture display roomsto BoxJelly, a public space. She was then directed to a small back roomin which there were folding chairs and worktables already set up forthe event. Rechung Fujihira, the owner of BoxJelly, told me that HiCapacity, a “creative collective” of computer buffs, had arranged thelogistics for the event. As he recalled, Snowden had requested theirhelp for the CryptoParty.Sandvik found Snowden waiting for her with Lindsay Mills,whom he introduced to Sandvik as his girlfriend. He told Sandvikthat Mills was there to make a video of the event. Mills did not mentionthe party in her blog. But that Snowden brought her and introducedher to Sandvik suggests that he did not keep secret from herhis activities to further Tor.The event started at 6:00 p.m. sharp. By Sandvik’s count, abouttwenty people gradually filled the room. She reckoned that abouthalf of the attendees were from Snowden’s workplace. Snowdenbegan the presentation by giving reasons why Internet users neededto defend their privacy by using both encryption and Tor software.According to one attendee who asked not to be identified by name,Snowden, while not revealing that he worked for the NSA, spokewith such precise knowledge about government surveillance capabilitiesthat the attendee suspected Snowden worked for the govern-Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 569/29/16 5:51 PMHacktivist | 57ment. Snowden next introduced Sandvik, who took the podium anddiscussed the work of the Tor Project, stressing the importance ofexpanding the Tor network. Following their presentations, Snowdenand Sandvik took questions from the audience.The Oahu CryptoParty, according to Sandvik, ended about10:00 p.m. No one objected to Mills’s making a video of the meeting,even though it was dedicated to the idea of protecting personalprivacy. The video was not posted on the Internet, so presumablySnowden wanted it for his own purposes. Afterward, Sandvik wentto a local diner called Zippy’s for a late dinner. She left Hawaii twodays later.Not all the hacktivists that Snowden invited were able to attend.Parker Higgins, for example, a prime mover in the Electronic FrontierFoundation and founder of the San Francisco CryptoParty, wroteback to him that he was unable to attend the December CryptoPartybecause of the high price of the airfare that month between San Franciscoand Honolulu. He added that he would try to attend Snowden’snext CryptoParty, which was scheduled for February 23, 2013. (Higginswould make headlines in 2013 by flying a chartered blimp overthe NSA’s secret facility in Utah and photographing it from the air.)Snowden’s double duty continued: downloading secret documentswhile remaining in touch with some of the leading figuresin the Tor Project under his various aliases. He also continued toinvite activists to his CryptoParties, and he openly advertised themon the Internet until 2013. The CIA’s former deputy director Morell,who reviewed the security situation at the NSA in 2014 as a memberof President Obama’s NSA Review Committee, found that theNSA in the post– Cold War age had encouraged its technical workersto freely discuss challenges that arose in its computer operations.“The idea was to spread knowledge and learn from the successesof others,” Morell wrote, “but it created enormous security vulnerability,given the always- existent risk of an insider committed tostealing secrets.” According to a former intelligence executive, thisnew “open culture,” exemplified by largely unrestricted entry to theNSANet by civilian contractors, fit the culture of the young civilianson the “geek squads” who now ran the NSA’s computer networks.It was remarkable that even in such an “open culture,” Snowden’sEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 579/29/16 5:51 PM58 | how america lost its secretsCryptoParty, Tor station, and other anti- NSA activities could gounremarked upon. After all, ten or so NSA workers attended thefirst party, and it is not unlikely that many of them recognizedhim as their co- worker. If so, they knew (as did Sandvik and Mills)that the Tor advocate “Cincinnatus” was Snowden. He had also notbeen shy in contacting notable enemies of the NSA via e- mail, suchas Jacob Appelbaum, Parker Higgins, and Asher Wolf. If anyone,including the security staff of the NSA, had been on the lookout fordissident intelligence workers, this well- advertised gathering and itsorganizer might have been of interest.In 2014, I asked a former top NSA executive whether such activitieson behalf of Tor by an NSA employee would arouse the attentionof the NSA’s own “Q” counterespionage unit. He answered,“Snowden was not an NSA employee.” Because Snowden was acontract employee of Dell’s residing in the United States, the NSAcould not legally monitor his private activities or intercept his communication.To do so would require a court- approved FBI request. SoSnowden/Cincinnatus was free to operate openly in recruiting NSAworkers, hacktivists, and computer buffs for his events. Ironically,adversary intelligence services searching for disgruntled intelligenceworkers had no such constraints.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 589/29/16 5:51 PMchapter 7String PullerIt wasn’t that they put it on me as an individual— that I’m uniquelyqualified [or] an angel descending from the heavens— as that theyput it on someone, somewhere.— edward snowden, Moscow, 2013Downloading NSA documents was not Snowden’s only rogueactivity while working at the NSA for Dell in 2012. Threeweeks after the CryptoParty, Snowden began anonymously contactinga high- profile journalist. He used the same alias, Cincinnatus,that he used with Sandvik and to advertise the Oahu CryptoParty.The journalist to whom he wrote on December 1, 2012, was GlennGreenwald, the previously mentioned Rio- based columnist for TheGuardian.Greenwald had not always been an activist journalist. He hadbeen a litigation lawyer at the elite New York firm of Wachtell, Lipton,Rosen & Katz. He was also an entrepreneur, owning part ofMaster Notions, a company that, among other things, had a 50 percentfinancial interest in the pornographic website HJ (an acronymthat originally stood for “Hairy Jock”). All did not go well with thisenterprise. In 2004, Greenwald became involved in an acrimoniouslawsuit with his other associates in HJ. As a result, he had a numberEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 599/29/16 5:51 PM60 | how america lost its secretsof open legal judgments filed against him, including an $85,000 lienby the IRS.After resigning from his law firm in 2005, he moved to Rio deJaneiro and began a new career as a blogger for the Internet magazineSalon. He wrote fierce, and often brilliant, polemics against U.S.government surveillance and other perceived intrusions on personalprivacy. The extent of his bitter antagonism toward the activities ofthe “surveillance state,” as he called it, was reflected in the title ofhis 2006 book, How Would a Patriot Act? Defending American Valuesfrom a President Run Amok. His position on surveillance wasunrelenting, even when it came to the president. “By ordering illegaleavesdropping, the president had committed crimes and should beheld accountable for them,” Greenwald wrote. When Barack Obamabecame president in 2009, Greenwald also attacked him for breakingthe law by “ordering illegal eavesdropping.” Because of his oppositionto Obama, he contributed money to the libertarian campaign ofRon Paul, the same candidate to whom Snowden gave money.In August 2012, he had transferred his provocative blog, whichhad amassed a following of nearly one million readers (includingSnowden), from Salon to The Guardian. The British newspapershared his powerful anti- surveillance position, having first publishedthe WikiLeaks documents that had been illicitly leaked by Manningand published by Assange in 2010.Greenwald was an activist as well as a journalist. He joined theboard of directors of the Freedom of the Press Foundation (eventuallyRuna Sandvik would join too). It had been set up expressly tofunnel money to both Assange’s WikiLeaks site and the defense fundfor Manning after he was arrested. Such a financial intermediarywas necessary because American credit card companies were blockingmoney transfers to these two causes in 2012. This “blockade”was taking its toll on WikiLeaks. According to Assange, “WikiLeakshad been cut off from more than 90 percent of its finances.” TheFreedom of the Press Foundation came to its rescue. John Perry Barlow,one of the songwriters for the Grateful Dead, was one of itschief financial backers. “The first serious info war is now engaged,”Barlow declared. “The field of battle is WikiLeaks.” He served withGreenwald and Poitras on its board.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 609/29/16 5:51 PMString Puller | 61Snowden was an avid reader of Greenwald’s screeds against thegovernment. If he were to assume the role of a modern- day Prometheus,delivering forbidden NSA secrets to the public, Greenwaldwould be a logical candidate to break the story. Snowden could safelyassume that Greenwald would be sympathetic to exposing NSA surveillancefrom his many blogs, tweets, and YouTube comments onthe subject. For example, on November 13, 2012, just eighteen daysbefore Snowden contacted him, Greenwald had written a blog forThe Guardian asserting that the United States was “a surveillancestate run amok.” In it, echoing very closely what Snowden said at hisCryptoParty, Greenwald wrote, “Any remnants of internet anonymityhave been all but obliterated between the state and technologycompanies.” Citing a story in The Washington Post, he continued,“Every day, collection systems at the National Security Agencyintercept and store 1.7 billion e- mails, phone calls and other typesof communications.”As a result, Greenwald called for action in that blog posting, writing,“The US operates a sprawling, unaccountable Surveillance Statethat, in violent breach of the core guarantees of the Fourth Amendment,monitors and records virtually everything even the mostlaw- abiding citizens do.” That same week, Snowden invited RunaSandvik to co- host his CryptoParty.One problem for Snowden in reaching out to Greenwald wasGreenwald’s lack of any encryption for his e- mails. Communicatingwith a journalist like Greenwald who famously attacked the veryorganization for which Snowden worked was itself a risky undertaking,especially if he wanted to pass classified NSA documents tohim. If his e- mails were intercepted by the NSA in Brazil (whereGreenwald lived) and where the NSA was not restricted by U.S. law,he could lose his job or even be arrested. As Cincinnatus, he toldGreenwald that he needed to immediately encrypt his computer. Tomake his point, he cited Greenwald’s November 12, 2012, blog. In it,Greenwald noted that General David Petraeus, then the CIA director,had been caught in a sex scandal because his personal e- mailshad been intercepted. Snowden wrote to Greenwald that Petraeuswould not have been exposed if he had used encryption. Snowdensent Greenwald instructions on how to install the necessary encryp-Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 619/29/16 5:51 PM62 | how america lost its secretstion software and a link to a twelve- minute video on encryption(which might have been the same video he used at his CryptoPartya few weeks earlier).Greenwald did not manage to encrypt his computer, however,and Snowden, unwilling to deal with Greenwald through an unencryptedchannel, broke off contact with him in January 2013. Evenso, he did not give up his plan of using Greenwald in his enterprise.He merely sought an intermediary who used encryption.He chose Laura Poitras. He knew she and Greenwald were foundingboard members of the Freedom of the Press Foundation. Greenwaldhad written about her extensively. For example, he wrote anentire blog about her confrontation with the U.S. government andher plans to make a documentary about the “US Government’sincreasing powers of domestic surveillance [through] its expandingcovert domestic NSA activities.”Since 2011, Poitras had been diligently filming the constructionof a massive NSA repository for data in Bluffdale, Utah. In the antisurveillanceculture, the structure had become symbolic of the powersof the NSA. In fact, it was the same NSA site that Parker Higginsphotographed from a blimp in the fall of 2013 and posted on theInternet after Poitras had released her documentary about the NSA’suse of the Bluffdale repository for domestic spying.Aside from her connections with Greenwald, Poitras had otherimpressive credentials. Born in 1964 in Boston, she came from awealthy family that donated large sums of money to philanthropiccauses, including $20 million for research on bipolar disorders. Aftergraduating from the New School for Public Engagement in 1996,she pursued a career as an activist filmmaker. Her focus quicklybecame exposing NSA surveillance. One of her short documentariesabout the NSA’s domestic surveillance program was featured on theNew York Times website and attracted enormous attention in 2012.As a dedicated opponent of the surveillance state, she participatedin public events with William Binney, the ex- NSA whistle- blower,and Jacob Appelbaum. In April 2012, for example, she made a presentationat the Whitney Museum in New York with Binney andAppelbaum. She had become such a leading activist against the NSAby December 2012 that Appelbaum, after lauding her work, inter-Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 629/29/16 5:51 PMString Puller | 63spersed clips from her short film in his keynote address at the ChaosComputer Club convention of hacktivists in Berlin that month.Snowden also closely followed her rise in this world. By simplygoogling Poitras’s name in January 2013, he would have learnedabout her connections with Greenwald, Appelbaum, Binney,Assange, and other leading figures in the anti- surveillance camp.When asked later by Poitras why he had chosen her to help him,Snowden replied, “I didn’t. You chose yourself.” The problem forSnowden was anonymously drawing her into his enterprise.Poitras was living in Berlin in January 2013, which made her vulnerableto NSA surveillance. To get to her through an encryptedchannel, Snowden chose a circuitous approach. On January 11, hewrote to Micah Lee in Berkeley, California. Given Lee’s residencein the United States, as Snowden knew, the NSA would be legallybarred from monitoring his communications without a warrant.He used Lee, who was the chief technology officer at the Freedomof the Press Foundation, as the encrypted gateway to Poitras. Leewas also well- connected to others whom Snowden had contactedfor his CryptoParty. Lee had been an associate of Runa Sandvik’s atTor and was a prominent member of Noisebridge, an eclectic antigovernmenthackers’ commune based in Northern California, ofwhich Appelbaum was also a member.To contact Lee, Snowden chose the alias Anon108. Anon is analias frequently used by members of the Anonymous communeof hacktivists. “I’m a friend,” Snowden wrote to Lee. “I need to getinformation securely to Laura Poitras and her alone, but I can’t findan email gpg key for her.” The “gpg” encryption key he asked for,more commonly called a PGP key, was the so- called public key foran encryption system called Pretty Good Privacy, or, for short, PGP.This encryption system required both a public and a private key.Snowden asked Lee to provide the former one, because Poitras hadthe latter one. Lee wrote to Poitras about Anon108. The next day,with the approval of Poitras, Lee supplied Poitras’s public key toSnowden, or, as he knew him, Anon108.With it, Snowden contacted Poitras directly. He asked her as a firststep to open an anonymous e- mail account using Tor software. Poitraslater wrote about this initial contact, “I was at that point film-Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 639/29/16 5:51 PM64 | how america lost its secretsing with several people who were all being targeted by the [U.S.]government.” Many of the people she was filming, including Appelbaum,Assange, Binney, and the former NSA employee ThomasDrake, could attract interest by U.S. or foreign intelligence services.Snowden asked Poitras to take out a new enciphering key to useexclusively for her liaison with him. It provided them both with anextra layer of protection from any surveillance by law enforcement.Presumably, she accommodated his requests because she anticipatedthat the anonymous person would use this encrypted channel tosend her highly sensitive material.On January 23, Snowden wrote to Poitras under yet another alias.This time he called himself Citizen Four. He wrote, “At this stage Ican offer nothing more than my word.” He then said falsely, “I ama senior government employee in the intelligence community.” Shehad no way of knowing at this “stage” that despite giving her his“word,” he was not who he claimed to be. He was not a “governmentemployee,” he was not a “senior” official, and he was not a memberof the “intelligence community” (which is composed of the intelligenceservices of the U.S. government). He would later also claimto her that he had been “a senior adviser to the CIA” and “a senioradviser to the DIA.” That was untrue, too. In January 2013, he wasmerely a contract employee of Dell’s working as a computer technicianat the NSA base in Hawaii.Snowden told her in his initial e- mail that he was well acquaintedwith her career as an anti- surveillance activist. He said that he hadread Greenwald’s account in Salon that past April, a blog in whichGreenwald detailed the forty times in which Poitras was searched byU.S. authorities. The story also said that Poitras believed she was ona special watch list and under constant U.S. government surveillance.She had come under such scrutiny by U.S. authorities, it turned out,because of her documentary about American military abuses of civiliansin Iraq in 2006, titled My Country, My Country. While filmingit, she was at a place close to an insurgent ambush of U.S. troops inIraq. Her presence at the ambush site led army intelligence officersto suspect (without any evidence) that she might have been tippedoff by the insurgents. She firmly denied the charge, and the governmentnever substantiated it. Even so, because of this incident, sinceEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 649/29/16 5:51 PMString Puller | 652006 she had been kept on a list that caused authorities to search herat airports. As a result, she took elaborate countermeasures to evadeany possible surveillance of her communications.Snowden knew about this incident because Greenwald describedit in great detail in a blog that Snowden read (as he later told Greenwald).“Poitras is now forced to take extreme steps— ones that hamperher ability to do her work,” Greenwald wrote. “She now avoidstraveling with any electronic devices. She uses alternative methodsto deliver the most sensitive parts of her work— raw film and interviewnotes— to secure locations. She spends substantial time andresources protecting her computers with encryption and passworddefenses. Especially when she is in the US, she avoids talking onthe phone about her work, particularly to sources. And she simplywill not edit her films at her home out of fear— obviously wellgrounded— that government agents will attempt to search and seizethe raw footage.” She claimed, as she told journalists, she was thevictim of “Kafkaesque government harassment.”Snowden was duly impressed with her concerns about governmentsurveillance, which he agreed was ubiquitous. Indeed, he laterdescribed her as “more paranoid when it comes to electronic securitythan I can be.” He meant it as a compliment. Such functional paranoiaor “operational security,” as Greenwald would call the precautionsthat she took, dovetailed with Snowden’s growing convictionthat universal encryption was necessary to defeat the surveillancestate. It also made her the perfect channel for Snowden to safely passsome of the classified documents he stole to Greenwald and otherjournalists.It was not difficult to get her to cooperate in his plot. He wrote,for example, “The surveillance you’ve experienced means you havebeen ‘selected’— a term which will mean more to you as you learnhow the modern SIGINT [signals intelligence] system works.” Justas she had been “chosen” by her work to act as his conduit, accordingto Snowden, she had been chosen by the NSA as a target becauseof her work. The idea of her being “selected” by an invisible signalsintelligence agency, the NSA, could only excite her longtime concernsabout being watched by the government.“Your victimization by the NSA system means that you are wellEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 659/29/16 5:51 PM66 | how america lost its secretsaware of the threat that [the NSA’s] unrestricted, secret abilities posefor democracies,” he continued. “I hope you understand that contactingyou is extremely high risk and if you are willing to agreeto the following precautions before I share more, this will not be awaste of your time.” Further playing on her concern, he asked her toconfirm to him “that no one has ever had a copy of your private keyand that it uses a strong pass phrase.” Such precautions were necessarybecause “your adversary is capable of one trillion guesses persecond.” That “adversary” was, as she knew from her previous film,the NSA. At this point, she knew she was entering into a dangerousliaison with an unknown party in pursuit of NSA secrets. She wonderedif he might be part of a plan to entrap her or her contacts likeAssange and Appelbaum, as she noted in her diary. “Is C4 a trap?”she asked herself, referring to her Citizen Four source. “Will he putme in prison?”To elude this “adversary,” Snowden stressed to Poitras that shewould have to adopt a conspiratorial frame of mind. “If the deviceyou store the private key and enter your pass phrase on has beenhacked, it is trivial to decrypt our communications,” he explained. “Ifyou publish the source material, I will likely be immediately implicated.”If her correspondent could be “immediately implicated,” itmeant that he was a person authorized to handle these secrets. SoPoitras knew, as early as January 2013, that she was creating anencrypted channel for someone with access to NSA secrets whowould be incriminated by providing them to her.The key source for Poitras’s previously referred to short videowas Binney. Like her new source, he had been authorized to handleNSA secrets. Binney had been an NSA technical director until hehad retired in 2001. The NSA’s domestic surveillance program thatBinney told the press about years before being interviewed in Poitras’sfilm was called Stellarwind. It involved data mining domesticcommunications and financial transactions that had been authorizedby President George W. Bush in 2001 after 9/11 as commander- inchiefunder the war powers given to him following the attacks. Itindeed led to a major exposé on domestic spying by The New YorkTimes in December 2005.Binney had never provided Poitras with any NSA documentsEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 669/30/16 11:09 AMString Puller | 67to back up the charges he made that Stellarwind was an unlawfuldomestic surveillance operation. He could not have done so withoutviolating his sworn oath and, for that matter, U.S. anti- espionagestatutes. Binney made it clear to her and other journalists that hewas not a lawbreaker. But her new source, C4, was willing to dowhat Binney (and other insiders) had refused to do. He was offeringin these e- mails to provide her with secret government documents,even though it would implicate him as an outlaw. To furtherwhet her appetite, he told her that these up- to- date NSA documentswould fully substantiate the allegations that Binney made in herfilm. Even more important, he said Binney’s 2001 disclosures werestill relevant to her cause. “What you know as Stellarwind hasgrown,” he wrote to her. “The expanded special source operationsthat took over Stellarwind’s share of the pie have spread all over theworld to practically include comprehensive coverage of the UnitedStates.” In fact, as Snowden knew from the Inspector General reporthe had read, the NSA had terminated Stellarwind almost a decadeearlier. President Bush ended it after top officials of the JusticeDepartment insisted that he did not have the legal authority for thedomestic part of Stellarwind. Instead, he asked Congress to reviseFISA to meet the objections of the Justice Department. The resultwas the FISA Amendment Act of 2006. Unlike the previous Stellarwindprogram, it did not permit domestic surveillance. It specifiedthat the government could not target any person in the UnitedStates or anywhere else in the world under this authority. Nor couldit target any foreign person, even one residing outside of the UnitedStates, to acquire information from a particular known person insidethe United States. As the act recognized that information about U.S.citizens might mistakenly be intercepted by the NSA, it requiredthat such data about Americans be expunged in a bimonthly reviewby a Justice Department task force. Although the NSA program inplace in 2013 was not the comprehensive domestic surveillance thatSnowden claimed it to be, Poitras had no way of knowing at thisearly state that her source was misleading her.He offered to substantiate her worst fears about the growth ofNSA surveillance: “I know the location of most domestic interceptionpoints, and that the largest telecommunication companies in theEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 679/30/16 11:09 AM68 | how america lost its secretsUS are betraying the trust of their customers, which I can prove.”He even proffered evidence implicating President Barack Obama inillegal surveillance. “There is a detailed policy framework, a kind ofmartial law for cyber operations, created by the White House. It’scalled presidential policy 20,” he wrote to her. It was an eighteenpagedirective that Obama had signed four months earlier in October2012. Snowden was offering to reveal to her up- to- date evidenceof a surveillance state in America presided over by the presidenthimself. It was what she had been searching for over the past threeyears. How could she, as an activist filmmaker, resist such a sensationaloffer?He further explained to her that he had placed great trust in herdiscretion. “No one, not even my most trusted confidante, is awareof my intentions, and it would not be fair for them to fall under suspicionfor my actions,” he said.Poitras must have found it flattering that a total stranger waswilling to disclose to her in e- mails what he would not tell even his“most trusted confidante” about his intentions to commit an illicitbreach of U.S. national security. It also put her under enormousstress. She noted in her journal that the pressure made her feel as ifshe were “underwater.” “I am battling with my nervous system. Itdoesn’t let me rest or sleep. Eye twitches, clenched throat, and nowliterally waiting to be raided.”Snowden was also taking an extraordinary risk. After all, he hadno way of knowing who else she told about him. She had long beenconcerned, with good reason, that the U.S. government was out toget her. An unknown person offering to supply her with secret documentscould be attempting to entrap her. So Snowden could not precludethe possibility that she would consult with others about theoffer he was making her. Because her current documentary projectincluded interviews by her with Assange, Appelbaum, and three ex-NSA executives, intelligence services with sophisticated surveillancecapabilities might also have taken a professional interest in her communications,as Poitras herself had suspected. Even if Snowden wassomehow able to use his position as a system administrator at Dellto ascertain that the NSA did not have Poitras under surveillance, hecould not be sure that other agencies, such as the Russian and Chi-Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 689/29/16 5:51 PMString Puller | 69nese intelligence services, were not monitoring his communicationswith her. It was, however, a chance Snowden was willing to take.Snowden, in any case, did not intend to conceal his identity formore than a few months. He told Poitras he had a specific purposein allowing her to name him in her ongoing film project. Indeed,he said it was essential in his plan to prevent others, including presumablyhis “most trusted confidante,” from being suspected by lawenforcement of helping him in his enterprise. He prevailed on herto accommodate his plan, saying, “You may be the only one whocan prevent that, and that is by immediately nailing me to the crossrather than trying to protect me as a source.” His choice of the imageryof crucifixion suggested that like Jesus Christ he was willing tosacrifice himself for the sake of others.In keeping with their operational security arrangement, Snowdensaid that he would first send her an encrypted file of documents thatshe would not be able to read. Only after his conditions were met and“everything else is done,” he said, “the key will follow.” He was nowpulling the strings. To get that key, she had to follow his instructions.One of his conditions was that she help him recruit Greenwaldand other outlets for his disclosures. “The material provided andthe investigative effort required will be too much for any one person,”he wrote to Poitras. He next directed her to contact Greenwald.“I recommend that at the very minimum you involve Greenwald. Ibelieve you know him.” (Snowden apparently did not tell her thathe had unsuccessfully attempted to reach out to Greenwald before hehad contacted her.)His continued interest in Greenwald was understandable. Asidefrom Greenwald’s opposition to what he called the “SurveillanceState,” he was a gateway to The Guardian. That publication hadbecome an important player in the business of disclosing governmentdocuments by publishing a large part of the U.S. documentssupplied to WikiLeaks, as we have seen. By breaking whistleblowingstories about U.S. intelligence, it had also greatly increasedthe circulation of its website. As an establishment newspaper, it alsogave these WikiLeaks stories credibility with the media. So despiteGreenwald’s inability to create an encrypted channel, Snowden stillneeded him. He had no reason to believe that Greenwald would turnEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 699/29/16 5:51 PM70 | how america lost its secretsdown the opportunity for a whistle- blowing scoop for The Guardian.After all, the classified documents Snowden would provide himwould also give credence to both Greenwald’s book and his manyblogs denouncing U.S. government surveillance.Aside from Greenwald and Poitras, Snowden sought an outletinside the American establishment. So he had Poitras write to BartonGellman, the Pulitzer Prize– winning reporter for The WashingtonPost. Poitras had met Gellman in 2010, when they were both fellowsat NYU’s Center on Law and Security. Poitras had requested helpin encrypting her computer from Karen Greenberg, the executivedirector of the center, who took her “by the hand” to meet Gellman,Greenberg’s resident expert on encryption software. Born in 1960,Gellman graduated from Princeton in 1981 and became an awardwinninginvestigative reporter for the Miami Herald, the Post, andTime magazine. He was also the author of Angler: The Cheney VicePresidency. If Gellman could be drawn into the enterprise, he couldprovide Snowden with a gateway to the prestigious American papercredited with bringing down President Richard Nixon in the Watergatescandal.Poitras, as the go- between for Snowden, immediately contactedGellman. After telling him she was involved in a story about NSAsurveillance, she suggested that they meet in New York City.For their rendezvous, Poitras took a number of precautions toevade anyone attempting to follow her. She had Gellman first meether in one coffee shop in lower Manhattan. When he arrived, she hadhim follow her on foot to another coffee shop, following her antisurveillancetradecraft. Once assured no one was watching them, sheordered coffee for herself and Gellman. Over coffee, she told Gellmanabout Snowden, whom she described as her anonymous source.She said that he was willing to supply Gellman with documents thatwould expose domestic surveillance, if Gellman agreed to write astory on it for the Post. Even though Gellman had left the staff ofthe Post in 2010, he had previously written several stories on thatsubject for the newspaper, and he was also highly regarded by theeditors there. Gellman was interested in Poitras’s offer (although hewould consult a friend at the Justice Department about the legalityof publishing NSA documents).Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 709/29/16 5:51 PMString Puller | 71Snowden had now laid the groundwork for at least two possibleoutlets. Poitras, however, was having some difficulty in bringingGreenwald in on the plan. Like Snowden, she did not trust writingto him in unencrypted e- mails, and because Greenwald lived in Brazil,she still had not found an opportunity for a face- to- face meetingwith him.That opportunity arose in mid- April 2013. Greenwald had flownto the United States to give the lead speech at an event in Yonkers,New York, sponsored by the Council on American- Islamic Relations,a pro- Muslim civil rights organization. He had delivered thekeynote speech at its previous meeting in San Jose, California, wherehis impassioned depiction of the American “Surveillance State”received a rousing ovation from the attendees. He was invited tospeak at this award dinner for its East Coast chapter.Poitras flew from Berlin to New York to see him. On April 19,2013, she arranged to meet Greenwald at noon in the restaurant ofthe Marriott hotel where Greenwald was staying. When Greenwaldarrived at the restaurant carrying a cell phone, she explained to himthat the NSA could surreptitiously turn his cell phone into a microphoneand use it to eavesdrop on their conversation. She told him togo back to his room and leave his phone there. When he returned,phoneless, she took further precautions by having them changetables several times. Greenwald accepted these tactics because, as helater said, she was in charge of their “operational security.”When they finally settled at a table in the nearly empty restaurant,she showed Greenwald e- mails she had received from CitizenFour. Greenwald, as he recounted, made “no connection” to the“long- forgotten emails” he had received from Snowden under thealias Cincinnatus. Reading the e- mails that Snowden had sent toPoitras, he was impressed with the “sincerity” of the anonymouscorrespondent.When Poitras showed Greenwald Citizen Four’s mission statementin which he said his motive was to end the U.S. “surveillancestate,” Greenwald was further impressed with the source. The surveillancestate Snowden described closely dovetailed with the surveillancestate that Greenwald had described himself in his speechat the Council on American- Islamic Relations dinner in 2012. OfEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 719/29/16 5:51 PM72 | how america lost its secretscourse, the similarity of the phrasing might not have been entirelycoincidental. Greenwald’s 2012 speech had been put on YouTube andwidely circulated on the Internet just a few days before Snowdenfirst wrote to him on December 1, 2012. Snowden identified himselfas a privacy advocate, which was also how Greenwald often identifiedhimself in his speeches. He also echoed other concerns Greenwaldhad publicly expressed, including defending American privacyfrom government intrusions.Snowden promised the leaks he would supply would provide dramaticresults. He asserted in one of his e- mails to Poitras that the“shock” of the documents he would give Greenwald would result inthe public’s learning about the secret “mechanisms through whichour privacy is violated.” According to Snowden’s assessment, followingthat initial uproar, they could achieve another objective in theircommon cause. “We can guarantee for all people equal protectionagainst unreasonable search,” he wrote. In light of this convergenceof views, it is not surprising that Greenwald was fully convincedof Citizen Four’s bona fides. He said to Poitras, “He’s real,” and heagreed to help break the story in The Guardian.Poitras now revealed to Greenwald that Citizen Four would deliveran entire trove of secret documents to them in six to eight weeks.According to this timetable, the Greenwald scoop and the “shock”Citizen Four promised would come in early to mid- June 2013.At this point in April, Snowden was in full control. Althoughhis job at Dell involved endlessly monitoring largely meaninglessencrypted messages in the NSA tunnel, he had been able to get threemajor journalists to react favorably to his proposal. None of themknew his name, position, age, location, or where precisely he worked.Nor did they know the means by which he planned to obtain thesecrets that he dangled before them. They also did not know where,or even if, they would meet their source. Their total knowledge abouthim was the description he improperly gave of himself: a “seniorgovernment employee in the intelligence community” (Greenwaldspeculated that he was a disgruntled CIA station chief).Even though they were operating largely in the dark, these threejournalists acted as almost any other ambitious reporter would if heor she were offered a major scoop about illegal acts of the govern-Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 729/29/16 5:51 PMString Puller | 73ment. In addition, the information was in line with what they hadpreviously investigated or written about. None of these journalistshad any reason to doubt at this point that their anonymous sourcewas anything but the sincere whistle- blower he claimed to be. Theycould not have known from his anonymous e- mails that aside fromthe whistle- blowing documents he promised them, he was in theprocess of stealing a large number of other documents that concernedthe NSA’s sources and methods in foreign countries. Thesedocuments, to which Snowden never referred in his correspondencewith them, had little if anything at all to do with domestic spying onAmerican citizens.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 739/29/16 5:51 PMchapter 8Raider of the Inner SanctumThey think there’s a smoking gun in there that would be thedeath of them all politically.— edward snowden, Moscow, 2014The nightmare of the NSA is a penetration. As the CIA, theFBI, and the NSA found out in the 1990s, no intelligence serviceis invulnerable to it. Any employee of a large intelligence organizationcan turn, or be turned, against it. Among the more than tenthousand intelligence workers employed by the NSA, it is a nearcertainty that over time more than one of them will become dissatisfiedwith their work. A worker may have a personal grievanceabout salary, lack of promotion, or treatment by his or her superiors.Disenchantment with the NSA may also proceed from idealisticobjections. The NSA is in the business of secretly interceptingmessages, and an insider could come to find its spying activities atodds with his or her own beliefs about the violation of privacy. Forany of these reasons, a disgruntled insider could go rogue. He or shethen might attempt to right a perceived wrong by disclosing NSAsecrets to another party. That party might then induce or blackmailthe rogue employee into disclosing further secrets.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 749/29/16 5:51 PMRaider of the Inner Sanctum | 75To guard against this, the NSA has developed a well- organizedsystem for stratifying its data so that obtaining critical secretsrequired a rogue employee to burrow into its heavily protected innersanctum. As part of this system, the NSA divides its data into differenttiers depending on the importance of the secrets to its operations.The first tier, Level 1, is mainly administrative material. This datawould include FISA court orders and other directives its employeesmight need to check on to carry out their tasks. Level 2 containsdata from which the secret sources have been removed. This tier,available to other intelligence services and policy makers, includesreports and analysis that can be shared. Level 3 contains documentsthat cannot be shared outside a small group of authorized individuals,because they disclose the secret sources through which the NSAsurreptitiously obtained the information. This third tier includes,for example, compiled lists of sources in China, Russia, Iran, andother adversary countries. It also discloses the exotic methods theNSA uses to get some of this data. Level 3 documents also includereports on specific NSA, CIA, and Pentagon operations unknown toadversaries. These Level 3 documents are described by NSA executivesas “the Keys to the Kingdom,” because they could invalidateAmerica’s entire intelligence enterprise if they fell into the hands ofan adversary. And, as far as is known, prior to 2013, there had beenno successful theft of any Level 3 documents.Because of their extreme sensitivity, Level 3 documents were nothandled by most of the private firms providing independent contractors.At Dell, Snowden had access mainly to Level 1 and Level 2 data(which he could, and did, download from shared sites on NSANet).These lower- level documents had whistle- blowing potential becausethey concerned NSA operations in the United States. They did notreveal, however, sources that the NSA used in intercepting the militaryand civilian activities of foreign adversaries.Snowden quit his job at Dell as a system administrator onMarch 15, 2013, to take another job working for the NSA in Hawaiiat Booz Allen Hamilton. Unlike other outside contractors that servicedthe NSA, the firm he now chose specialized in handling theNSA’s Level 3 data.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 759/29/16 5:51 PM76 | how america lost its secretsWhen Snowden applied to Booz Allen earlier in March 2013, thecompany had no opening for a system administrator at the NationalThreat Operations Center, an NSA unit in which it dealt withLevel 3 data. It did have an opening for an infrastructure analyst, alower- paying job involving maintaining the computer technologynecessary to monitor threats. Despite a cut in pay, Snowden tookthat job. “Snowden was an IT guy, not a SIGINT analyst,” a formerNSA Signals Intelligence officer pointed out. “He was working as acontracted infrastructure analyst for NSA’s Information Assurancearm, . . . [which, ironically as it turned out] protects classified U.S.communications from potential intruders.” Steven Bay, the managerat Booz Allen who hired and supervised Snowden, recalled that thefirst “red flag” came up soon after Snowden began he training, when“Snowden began asking about a highly classified mass-surveillanceprogram” to which Snowden did not have access (although Bay did).In retrospect, Bay realized that Snowden had applied for the job for aspecific reason. “He targeted our [Booz Allen] contract directly,” Baysaid. “Somehow he figured out that our contract, and what we didon that contract, were the types of gates he needed to get access to.”Snowden subsequently told the South China Morning Post thathe took this job to “get access to lists of machines all over the worldthe NSA had hacked.” If so, he was after the keys to the NSA’s kingdomof global surveillance. Booz Allen held those keys. “He targetedmy company because we enjoy more access than other companies,”Booz Allen’s vice- chairman Michael McConnell said with the benefitof hindsight. As a result of the theft, he appraised, “an entire generationof intelligence was lost.” McConnell, a former NSA director,was in a position to know.Snowden’s sudden career change had both advantages and disadvantagesfor the enterprise he was planning. The main advantagewas that he would have proximity to the computers in which werekept the “lists” he sought of NSA global sources. The main disadvantage,aside from a cut in salary, was that he would no longer be asystem administrator. This change meant he would no longer haveprivileges to bypass password restrictions or temporarily transferdata. Instead, as an infrastructure analyst, he would not have pass-Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 769/29/16 5:51 PMRaider of the Inner Sanctum | 77word access, at least during the two- month- long training period, tothe computers that he had not been specifically “read into,” whichdid not include those computers that stored the Level 3 lists. Accessto these tightly controlled compartments was limited to only a handfulof analysts at the center who had a need to know.Because the new job entailed handling higher- level secret documents,Booz Allen had stricter requirements for applicants thanDell. To slip by them, Snowden had engaged in a minor subterfuge.He wrote on his application that he was expecting a master’s degreefrom the online division of Liverpool University in England. In fact,he had not completed a single course at Liverpool and would not bereceiving any sort of a degree from it. Booz Allen did not verify thisand had agreed to hire him as a trainee- analyst. It did not changethat decision even after it found out about his subterfuge.According to Admiral McConnell, Snowden never actuallyworked in the Booz Allen offices, which are housed in a skyscraper indowntown Honolulu. Instead, he was immediately assigned to workat the NSA’s highly sensitive National Threat Operations Center atthe Kunia base, the same location where he had worked for Dell.Before he could begin working there, however, he needed to fly toMaryland to take a mandatory orientation course at the NSA. Thecourse was given in an eleven- story building, with a sheer wall ofblack glass, on the NSA’s 350- acre campus at Fort Meade. He arrivedthere from Hawaii on April 1, 2013. Like every other Booz Allencontractor who worked at the NSA’s center, Snowden was requiredto sign the “Sensitive Compartmented Information NondisclosureAgreement.” In this document, Snowden acknowledged that he hadbeen granted access to sensitive compartmented information, calledSCI, as part of his work and that he understood that any disclosureof that information to an unauthorized person would violate federalcriminal law. He was also told, as were all new contract employeesat Booz Allen, that its disclosure could damage the interests ofthe United States and benefit its enemies. In signing the document,he swore an oath not to divulge any of this information withoutfirst receiving written approval from U.S. authorities. So less thantwo months before he downloaded sensitive compartmented infor-Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 779/29/16 5:51 PM78 | how america lost its secretsmation, he was fully aware of what the consequences of divulgingthis information would be. By this time, as we know, he had alreadyagreed to deliver classified data to three journalists.Snowden believed that bringing complaints to NSA lawyers orsupervisors was, as he put it, “playing with fire.” “When I was atNSA,” Snowden later said in Moscow, “everybody knew that foranything more serious than workplace harassment, going throughthe official process was a career-ender at best.”Nevertheless, on April 5, 2013, while still in the training facilityin Maryland, he apparently sought to establish a paper trail for himself.He wrote a letter to NSA’s Office of the General Counsel askingwhether or not NSA directives take precedence over acts of Congress.A lawyer from the Office of the General Counsel respondedthree days later, addressing Snowden as “Dear Ed.” The lawyer saidthat acts of Congress take precedence over NSA directives. He alsosuggested that “Ed” phone him if he needed any further clarification.Presumably, Snowden had asked the question to elicit a replyhe could later use to bolster his claim that the NSA had ignored orrejected policies regarding NSA directives. Instead, the “Dear Ed”response was of little use to Snowden, because it did not dispute hispoint that NSA directives must lawfully conform to the acts of Congress.The NSA lawyer never heard back from “Ed.”Snowden completed his orientation course at Fort Meade on Friday,April 12, 2013. While he was in Maryland, he took time off topay visits to both of his divorced parents. It would be the last time hewould see either of them in the United States.He returned on April 13 to Hawaii. One domestic task he had toattend to was helping Mills pack up their possessions, which theystored in boxes in the garage. The lease on their house was up onApril 30, 2013, and they had to move. According to Mills, they founda temporary rental just a few blocks away.On Monday, April 15, Snowden began on- the- job training asan analyst at the National Threat Operations Center. He wouldnot complete the course. The same week he began the training, heprepared his exit by writing to Booz Allen and saying he needed abrief medical leave in May to undergo treatment for epilepsy symptoms.As far as is known, he did not suffer from epilepsy. Booz AllenEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 789/29/16 5:51 PMRaider of the Inner Sanctum | 79required a minimum of one month’s notice for foreign travel. Bymaking the request, he lessened the likelihood that it would arouseundue suspicion when he departed for Hong Kong with stolen documentson May 18. This brief window left him some four weeks totake the lists that he coveted.Snowden carried out the heist with precision reminiscent of aMission: Impossible movie caper. First, he needed to get passwords toup to twenty- four compartments at the National Threat OperationsCenter that he had not been read into. Even in the “open culture”of the NSA, this was not an easy challenge. He would be askingone or more intelligence professionals to break strict NSA rulesthat not only prohibited them from disclosing their passwords to anunauthorized party such as himself but required them to report anyunauthorized person who asked to use their passwords. Remarkably,he accomplished this incredible feat. He gained access to twenty- fourcompartments containing the NSA’s most closely guarded secrets ina matter of a few weeks.Next, he had to find the lists he was seeking in a vast ocean ofdata. For this task, he used software applications called spiders tocrawl through the data and find the files he was after. He deployedthese robotic spiders, which presumably had been programmed inadvance, soon after he began working at the center. According to thesubsequent NSA damage assessment, Snowden’s spiders indexedwell over one million documents. Many of those that he copied andmoved were from Level 3 sensitive compartmented information,according to the NSA analysis. The spiders also made his penetrationrelatively safe. As previously mentioned, the Hawaii base didnot have a real- time auditing system. So alarm bells did not go off inthe security office when he indexed documents.Finally, Snowden had to find a way to transfer this data to a computerwith an opened USB port. This task was complicated by a securityprecaution. Most of the computers at the center had had theirports sealed shut to prevent unauthorized downloads. Making thetransfer even more difficult, he was working as an analyst in trainingin an open- plan office with closed- circuit security cameras. But itwas not impossible. System administrators sometimes used servicecomputers that had unsealed ports to back up data before they didEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 799/29/16 5:51 PM80 | how america lost its secretsmaintenance work. Even though Snowden was no longer a systemadministrator, he could still perhaps befriend a system administratoror even steal or borrow a service computer.Whatever the NSA’s and Booz Allen’s security measures, Snowdensucceeded in getting the files. In a matter of a few weeks, he managedto download hundreds of thousands of Level 3 documents to anunsealed computer. He also took some less sensitive documents fromthe administrative file (which contained mainly Level 1 documents)at the end of April. These later acquisitions included an order fromthe FISA court issued on April 25, 2013.He had completed the operation by May 17, the last day he wouldever enter the NSA facility. He transferred the data he had amassedon the service computer, including the lists of the computers in Russiaand China that the NSA had succeeded in penetrating, onto storagedevices, which he later said were thumb drives. Then he coollywalked past the security guards at the exit, who only seldom performedrandom checks on NSA employees.He carried out the entire operation with such brilliant stealth thathe left few if any clues behind as to how he obtained his colleagues’passwords to multiple compartments, moved the data from manydifferent supposedly sealed computers to an opened service machine,or downloaded these documents to multiple thumb drives withoutarousing suspicion. The NSA would not discover the theft for fifteendays.His departure from Hawaii was also well prepared. Lindsay Millshad departed that morning for a planned two- week visit to the outerislands. This trip allowed him to pack his belongings without sayinganything to her that might be difficult for her to later explain. Hesimply left a note that she could show to authorities saying that hewas away on a “business trip.” He informed Bay that he would haveto go in for epilepsy tests on the following Monday and Tuesday. Ifthe results weren’t good, he might have to be out even longer.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 809/29/16 5:51 PMchapter 9Escape ArtistI’m not self- destructive. I don’t want to self- immolate and erasemyself from the pages of history. But if we don’t take chances, wecan’t win.— edward snowden, Moscow, 2014The next evening, May 18, Snowden drove to Honolulu InternationalAirport. He left his leased car in the parking lot. Hetook with him only carry- on baggage, including a backpack and alaptop with a Tor sticker on it. “I took everything I had on my back,”he said, referring to the backpack. He also said that he took enoughcash to pay for his fugitive life and he took the thumb drives containingthe NSA’s keys to the kingdom.At this point, of course, Snowden was not wanted by the authorities.He had provided his employer and the NSA with a medicalexcuse for his absence from work so he would not be immediatelymissed. He had a valid passport, a credit card, and ID. Snowden’s destinationwas Hong Kong. After crossing the international date line,Snowden waited about three hours in the transit zone of Narita. Hethen boarded a plane to Hong Kong. After the four- hour flight fromNarita, he arrived in Hong Kong early in the morning on May 20.He had visited Hong Kong at least once before, with LindsayMills, when he was stationed in Japan. According to Albert Ho, hisEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 819/29/16 5:51 PM82 | how america lost its secretsHong Kong lawyer, Snowden stayed at a residence arranged for himin advance by a party whom Snowden knew prior to his arrival. Asnoted earlier, for the next ten days, Snowden did not use his creditcard or leave any paper trail to his location. Wherever he was, “hisfirst priority,” as he later told Greenwald, was to find a place safefrom U.S. countermeasures. He brought with him a large numberof electronic copies of NSA documents marked TS/SCI/NOFORN,which stood for “Top Secret, Sensitive Compartmented Information,and No Foreign Distribution.” According to government rules,data carrying these labels could not be removed from a governmentapproved“SCI facility.” But Snowden, who brought them with himinto this semiautonomous zone in China, broke these rules.Wherever Snowden was staying, apparently he believed he wasrelatively safe. “That whole period was very carefully planned andorchestrated,” Snowden later told The Guardian in Moscow. OnMay 22, he sent an e-mail to Bay (who did not know he had leftHawaii) saying that his epilepsy tests came back with “bad” results,and he needed further medical attention. Here Snowden communicateddirectly first with Gellman and then with Greenwald. Hee- mailed Gellman under the alias “Verax.”Already, via Poitras, he had provided Gellman with PowerPointslides from an NSA presentation about a joint FBI- NSA- CIAoperation code- named PRISM. He believed it qualified as whistleblowingbecause it revealed that the NSA, in intercepting e- mails,tweets, postings, and other web interactions about foreign terrorists,incidentally also picked up data about Americans. According to therules imposed on the NSA by a 2007 presidential directive, whateverinformation was accidently picked up about Americans was supposedto be filtered out, and hundreds of compliance officers were torecheck the data every ninety days to assure that directive was beingcarried out. Even so, it was likely some data was not expunged in thisprocess. So PRISM could cause embarrassment for the NSA.Snowden had not yet made arrangements to meet journalists, butnow he proposed that Gellman join him in Hong Kong. In attemptingto convince him of the urgency of the trip, he wrote that he had reasonto believe that “omniscient State powers” imperiled “our freedomand way of life.” He noted, with a touch of modesty, “PerhapsEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 829/29/16 5:51 PMEscape Artist | 83I am naive.” He also added dramatically, “I have risked my life andfamily.” Even so, Gellman declined coming to Hong Kong. (Accordingto Greenwald, Gellman could not make the trip, because lawyersfor The Washington Post were uneasy with having a reporter receiveclassified documents in a part of China.)On May 24, 2013, Snowden attempted to apply more pressure onGellman by telling him that the story about the PRISM programhad to be published by the Post within seventy- two hours. Gellmancould not accede to such a condition, because the decision of when topublish a story was made not by him but by the editors of the newspaper.He told Snowden that the earliest the story could be publishedwas June 6, 2013, which was well past Snowden’s deadline.Snowden next turned to Greenwald in Brazil. Both Poitras andMicah Lee had made great efforts to tutor Greenwald on encryptionprotocols, with Lee’s sending Greenwald a DVD by FedEx that wouldallow him to receive both encrypted messages and encrypted phonecalls. Even then, Greenwald was unable to fully install it. As a result,Greenwald still had not met Snowden’s requisites on encrypting hiscomputer.With Gellman uncertain, Greenwald was now essential to Snowden’splan. If he was to have any newspaper outlet, he needed topersuade Greenwald to come to Hong Kong. At this point, he tookmatters into his own hands. On May 25, Snowden somewhat aggressivelye- mailed Greenwald, saying, “I’ve been working on a majorproject with a mutual friend of ours. You recently had to declineshort- term travel to meet with me.” Although he did not specify the“short- term travel” to which he referred, he added pointedly, “Youneed to be involved in this story.” He suggested that they immediatelyspeak on the phone via a website that encrypts conversations.Snowden began the call by complaining, “I don’t like how thisis developing.” He made it clear that he, not the journalist he hadselected, was pulling the strings. If Greenwald wanted the scoop, hehad to follow Snowden’s instructions, which included dividing thescoops between The Guardian and The Washington Post. Accordingto his plan, Gellman would break the PRISM story in the Post, andGreenwald would break the “mass domestic spying” story in TheGuardian. In addition, he insisted that The Guardian publish his per-Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 839/29/16 5:51 PM84 | how america lost its secretssonal manifesto alongside its story. As he envisioned it, the mediaevent would also include a video component in which Greenwaldwould interview him.Greenwald agreed to this micromanaging, So Snowden said hewould send him what he called a “welcome package” of documentsto demonstrate his good faith. His plan also required a face- to- facemeeting. Snowden told him, “The first order of business is to get youto Hong Kong.” The whole conversation lasted two hours, accordingto Greenwald.Snowden sent him twenty classified NSA documents labeled “TopSecret.” He also included in the package his personal manifesto,which asserted that the NSA was part of an international conspiracyof intelligence agencies that were working to “inflict upon the worlda system of secret, pervasive surveillance from which there is norefuge.”Meanwhile, Snowden told Poitras he was sending her a number ofNSA documents, including a FISA warrant that had been issued lessthan a month earlier. He wanted that FISA warrant to serve as thebasis of Greenwald’s scoop. It was perfect whistle- blowing materialfor The Guardian because it ordered Verizon to turn over all its billingrecords for ninety days to the NSA. It was as close to a smokinggun as anything he had copied at the NSA. It would also get attentionbecause James Clapper, the director of national intelligence, hadstated before Congress just two months earlier that the NSA did notcollect phone data in America. This warrant would allow The Guardian,in the best tradition of gotcha journalism, to catch Clapper in anapparent lie.Continuing his string pulling, Snowden instructed Poitras not toshow the FISA warrant to Greenwald until they were safely aboarda plane to Hong Kong. That would prevent Greenwald from releasingthe story previously. He also sent Poitras an entire encryptedfile of NSA documents, saying it would “include my true name anddetails for the record, though it will be your decision as to whetheror how to declare my involvement.” He did not send her the key todecipher the file, saying, “The key will follow when everything elseis done.” He further told her that he preferred that her new filmEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 849/29/16 5:51 PMEscape Artist | 85focus on him as the sole perpetrator of the leak so that no one else atthe NSA would be suspected.Poitras and Gellman were not the only journalists involved inthe news event. Poitras also asked Appelbaum to help her interviewSnowden about the NSA’s operations. She later said that she neededsomeone with technical expertise in government surveillance to testthe bona fides of Citizen Four. She believed that Appelbaum, whohad participated in her anti- NSA presentations in 2012, qualified forthe position.Snowden previously had contact with Appelbaum. Appelbaumhad communicated with Snowden under his Oahu CryptoParty aliasabout an obscure piece of software just a few weeks after Snowdenhad met with Runa Sandvik in Hawaii in December 2012. Appelbaum,in fact, had worked with Sandvik as a core developer of Torsoftware. Snowden allowed Appelbaum to put detailed questions tohim concerning the secret operations of the NSA before he met withPoitras and Greenwald in Hong Kong. Indeed, Poitras joined himin asking Snowden via encrypted e- mails such questions as “Whatare some of the big surveillance programs that are active todayand how do international partners aid the NSA?” “Does the NSApartner with other nations, like Israel?” and “Do private companieshelp the NSA?” Snowden answered all the questions to the satisfactionof Appelbaum and Poitras. (The interview was published onJuly 8, 2013, with Snowden’s approval on the website of Der Spiegel,the German weekly, which had also published the WikiLeaksdocuments.)As the days ticked away while Snowden was waiting for Greenwaldin Hong Kong, Greenwald was awaiting a green light to gothere from Janine Gibson, the editor of the Guardian website, whowas based in New York. Under Gibson’s leadership, The Guardian’swebsite had effectively “gone into the business of publishing governmentsecrets,” as the Guardian columnist Michael Wolff pointedout. Most of the documents had been supplied by Bradley Manningvia WikiLeaks. Few if any of these previous documents TheGuardian published were highly classified, and none were SCI topsecret documents. The NSA documents Greenwald had receivedEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 859/29/16 5:51 PM86 | how america lost its secretsfrom Citizen Four were another matter. They contained the sort ofSCI communications intelligence data that no major newspaper hadever published before. Their disclosure might result in journalists’being imprisoned, because both British law and U.S. law criminalizedthe disclosure by anyone of communications intelligence. As alawyer, Greenwald recognized this danger. On the other hand, theNSA documents were far more explosive than the WikiLeaks materialand promised an even greater spike in circulation. So Greenwaldassumed that Gibson would be willing to authorize their publicationand provide the expenses for his trip to Hong Kong.He flew from Rio to New York on May 30 to meet in personwith Gibson, who had concerns about publishing what were purportedto be top secret documents that came from an anonymoussource. She was certainly not willing to go along with Citizen Four’sdemand that The Guardian publish his personal manifesto alongsidethe documents. Aside from its shrill and alarming tone, it sounded,as she told Greenwald, “a bit Ted Kaczynski- ish,” referring to themathematician known as the Unabomber who had maimed or killedtwenty- six people with anonymous mail bombs between 1978 and1995. Kaczynski had also demanded that newspapers publish hispersonal manifesto. Gibson explained to Greenwald, “It is going tosound crazy to some people.” Her concern was that it would detractfrom the credibility of the rest of the story. Snowden had also writtento Greenwald to explain his position. “Even the Constitution issubverted when the appetites of power demand it,” Snowden said.Paraphrasing President Thomas Jefferson, he continued, “Let usspeak no more of faith in man, but bind him down from mischief bythe chains of cryptography.” Snowden, showing his cultlike faith inencryption, substituted “cryptography” for Jefferson’s word “constitution.”Gibson was unmoved. The stolen NSA documents wereanother matter. They were an enormous scoop that could have agreater impact than the WikiLeaks scoop.Gibson authorized Greenwald’s trip to Hong Kong on the conditionthat he take with him a Guardian staffer in whom she hadconfidence, the Scottish- born Ewen MacAskill, a sixty- one- year- oldveteran journalist who had been the Washington bureau chief forThe Guardian. His assignment was to evaluate the bona fides of theEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 869/29/16 5:51 PMEscape Artist | 87anonymous source in Hong Kong for Gibson. Greenwald acceptedher terms. Poitras, who would be accompanying them, would bepaying her own way.In case The Guardian failed to publish the story, Snowden had acontingency plan in place. While Greenwald was negotiating withGibson, Snowden arranged for Micah Lee, Poitras’s associate at theFreedom of the Press Foundation, to build a personal website forhim. Writing to Lee from Hong Kong, first under his alias Anon108and later under his real name, Snowden said that he planned to posthis “anti- surveillance manifesto.” He would also use it to post “aglobal petition against surveillance.” Snowden had Lee name the site“SupportOnlineRights.com.” According to Lee, the website wouldbe built with a “dead man’s switch,” which would automaticallytrigger the release of NSA documents if Snowden was arrested. Itwas not clear whether Lee was doing this work as a freelancer or inhis capacity as the chief technology officer for the Freedom of thePress Foundation. The website Lee built for Snowden proved unnecessarywhen Poitras e- mailed him on June 1 that The Guardian hadapproved the trip and she and Greenwald were booked on a CathayPacific flight to Hong Kong. They would arrive the next day.In his preparation to go public in Hong Kong, Snowden showedhimself fully capable of orchestrating what would become a majornews story. He not only picked the journalists who would breakit but also instructed each of them as to the timing, sequence, andcontent of their initial disclosures. In the security of his unknownresidence in Hong Kong, he also worked to carefully separate thepurloined NSA documents into two very different caches. “I carefullyevaluated every single document I disclosed,” Snowdenexplained to the Guardian journalists in early June. The documentsin this first cache were selected to serve what he termed the “publicinterest.” In the hands of journalists, these selected documents,and the story he fashioned to accompany them, would burnish hisimage in the public consciousness as a whistle- blower. He did notturn over the second cache, telling Greenwald, “There are all sortsof documents that would have made a big impact that I didn’t turnover.”By the time he received the message from Poitras, Snowden hadEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 879/29/16 5:51 PM88 | how america lost its secretsfinished his preparations for the journalists. With selected documentscopied on a thumb drive, he moved from the residence wherehe had been staying for ten days to a venue for meeting the reporters.The place he chose, as noted earlier, was the Mira hotel in theKowloon district of Hong Kong, where he checked in under his ownname. He e- mailed Poitras his name and the address of the hotel;there was no longer any reason to hide his true identity.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 889/29/16 5:51 PMc h a p t e r 10Whistle- blowerThey elected me. The overseers . . . The [American] system failedcomprehensively, and each level of oversight, each level of responsibilitythat should have addressed this, abdicated their responsibility.— edward snowden, Moscow, 2013While snowden in Hong Kong was attempting to reel inthe journalists, Lindsay Mills returned to Honolulu fromher “island- hopping” trip to find their house partially flooded andSnowden nowhere to be found. In a brief note Snowden left her, hesaid he was away on a business trip and indicated that, at least temporarily,their eight- year relationship was on hold.“I feel alone, lost, overwhelmed, and desperate for a reprieve fromthe bipolar nature of my current situation,” she wrote in her journalon June 2 (which would be June 3 across the international timelinein Hong Kong). “I’ve nearly lost my mind, family, and house overthe past few weeks.” She also noted in her online journal, “Oh andI physically lost my memory [SIM] card with nearly all my adventurephotos,” as well as other personal data. The loss would make itdifficult to reconstruct her past activities with Snowden.In Hong Kong, if Snowden were following Lindsay’s online journal,he would have read that his girlfriend had returned home, losther data, and needed a “reprieve” from the situation in which he hadEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 899/29/16 5:51 PM90 | how america lost its secretsput her. But because they were exchanging private text messagesby then, he would not have needed to consult her public journal.Snowden was certainly aware that he would soon be the object of amanhunt that could involve those with whom he was acquainted. Heinstructed Poitras to mask their e- mail communications in cyberspace“so we don’t have a clue or record of your true name in yourfile communication chain.” Such precautions were necessary, heexplained to her, because “every trick in the book is likely to be usedin looking into this.” The journalists arrived the evening of June 2.The Mira hotel can be entered by guests both through a groundfloorlobby with a restaurant and a smaller third- floor lobby thatconnects to the Mira shopping mall. The instructions that Snowdensent Poitras on her arrival were an exercise in control: “On timing,regarding meeting up in Hong Kong, the first rendezvous attemptwill be at 10 a.m. local time. We will meet in the hallway outsideof the restaurant in the Mira Hotel. I will be working on a Rubik’scube so that you can identify me. Approach me and ask if I know thehours of the restaurant. I’ll respond by stating that I’m not sure andsuggest you try the lounge instead. I’ll offer to show you where it is,and at that point we’re good. You simply need to follow naturally.”According to Greenwald’s account, Snowden changed the plan to theupper lobby. “We were to go to the third floor,” Greenwald writes.“We were to wait on a couch near a ‘giant alligator,’ ” which Poitrassaid was a room decoration. (A hotel executive told me that the hotelknew of no plastic alligator on the third floor but possibly it hadbeen temporarily parked there by a hotel guest.) They were thento give the recognition signal. Although these instructions providedthe atmospherics of “an international spy thriller,” as Greenwalddescribed them, Snowden hardly needed any spy tradecraft to recognizeGreenwald and Poitras because there were many photographsof them on the Internet.In any case, they gave the recognition signal, twice, in the designatedplace, and a young man walked over to them holdinga Rubik’s Cube. Greenwald noted, “The first thing I saw was theunsolved Rubik’s Cube, twirling in the man’s left hand.” The mansaid, “Hello,” and introduced himself as “Ed Snowden.”Greenwald was particularly surprised by Snowden’s boyish looks.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 909/29/16 5:51 PMWhistle- blower | 91“The initial impression was one of extreme confusion,” Greenwaldwrote in his book. “I was expecting to meet somebody in his sixtiesor seventies, someone very senior in the agency, because I knewalmost nothing about him prior to our arrival in Hong Kong.” Hisinitial confusion was understandable. Snowden, it will be recalled,had falsely identified himself to them in an e- mail as a senior memberof the intelligence community.Snowden led Greenwald and Poitras to the nearby elevator, andthey went through various corridors of the hotel to his room onthe tenth floor. It was mainly occupied by a king- sized bed, but italso featured a sleek writing desk in the corner, two chairs, and amodernistic lamp. The bathroom was behind a glass partition, whichcould be closed off by a black louver blind. There was also a smallrefrigerator in which Snowden asked them to stow their cell phones.Snowden, as we know, had already told Poitras that he wantedher to make a documentary of the meeting. She therefore wastedno time in mounting her camera on a tripod. “Minutes after meeting,I set up the camera,” she said. Snowden told her, “When youare involved in an action which is likely to get you indicted, youtypically don’t have a camera rolling in the room.” Nevertheless,he allowed her to film his actions for the next eight days. One possiblereason is that he had no intention of standing trial. In any case,as Poitras found out, Snowden was anything but camera shy. Overthe next week, she would shoot over twenty hours of Snowden’sactivities in that small room. It was essentially a one- man show, apresentation of him, by himself, for the appreciation of a global public.Poitras knew virtually nothing about her subject until ten minutesbefore she began filming him. She had not even googled him,because she was concerned that her Internet search might alert theNSA and law enforcement authorities. In an over- the- top waiver ofhis own privacy, he allowed her to film him washing in the bathroom,preening his hair in the mirror, napping on his bed, gettingdressed, and packing his bag. He even permitted her to film a privatecomputer exchange between him and Mills (who was in Honolulu).That day Mills informed Snowden that two government investigatorshad come to their home in Hawaii, asking her about Snowden’swhereabouts. When he had failed to show up for work on June 3 itEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 919/29/16 5:51 PM92 | how america lost its secretsevidently set off alarm bells at Booz Allen and the NSA. Snowdenexpressed anger to the journalists in the room at the NSA’s intrusionson the privacy of his girlfriend.Snowden also performed his security procedures on camera,including stuffing bed pillows under the door to block any eavesdroppersand throwing a red blanket over his head, which he calledjokingly his “magical cloak of power.” He explained to Greenwaldthat he donned his “cloak” when he turned on his laptop to preventany hidden cameras in the room from spotting his password. He alsochecked the hotel phone for bugs. It was not without irony that hewent through these security rituals to protect his data as he allowedPoitras to film NSA data on his computer screen. Because he plannedto use these journalists as his outlets to go public in a few days, thesecurity measures he performed while on camera would only servea temporary purpose.The centerpiece of the planned video would take the form of aninterview with Greenwald. Snowden himself provided the talkingpoints. The filming would eventually provide Poitras with a featurelengthdocumentary, Citizenfour, which would be commerciallyreleased in October 2014 and win an Academy Award for her.The next day, Ewen MacAskill, whom Poitras had not wantedGreenwald to bring to the initial meeting, joined Poitras and Greenwaldin Snowden’s room. Snowden insisted that MacAskill also gothrough the ritual of stowing his cell phone in the minibar refrigerator.Not without irony, Snowden’s own phone can be seen on his bedrecharging. Although MacAskill was sent by Gibson to the event toverify the source’s bona fides, he had apparently hardly been briefed.The questioning went as follows:macaskill: Sorry, I don’t know anything about you.snowden: OK, I work for—macaskill: Sorry, I don’t know even your name.snowden: Oh, sorry, my name is Edward Snowden. I go by Ed.MacAskill went on to ask him to enumerate the various positionshe held during his career in intelligence. Snowden was not entirelyEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 929/29/16 5:51 PMWhistle- blower | 93truthful in describing himself. He said that he had been a senioradviser to the CIA, when he had been just a telecommunications supportofficer. He also said he had been a senior adviser at the DefenseIntelligence Agency, even though, according to that intelligenceservice, he was never employed there. (He did speak at an interagencycounterintelligence course the DIA had sponsored.) He saidhe had a $200,000- a- year salary from Booz Allen when, accordingto Booz Allen, it was $133,000. It is understandable that he wantedto impress these Guardian journalists in light of his young age andboyish appearance, even to the extent of meretriciously claimingin the video that he had been personally given the “authority” atthe NSA to intercept President Obama’s private communications,which, according to an NSA spokeswoman, was not true. No NSAemployee, and certainly no civilian contract worker, was given theauthority to spy on the president of the United States, she insisted.Such career enhancements reinforced the fact that Snowden alteredreality when it suited his purpose with journalists.Snowden had greatly exaggerated or misrepresented the positionshe held with the CIA and the DIA, but no effort was made bythe team of journalists to verify the information. Instead, MacAskillwrote to Janine Gibson in New York, “The Guinness is good.” It wasa prearranged code by which MacAskill certified Snowden’s credibilityfor The Guardian. Gibson told Greenwald to proceed with thestory. Snowden had already provided Poitras and Greenwald withthumb drives on which he had loaded the documents he wantedthem to use.Greenwald wrote his first story about NSA transgressions basedalmost entirely on the FISA warrant involving Verizon’s cooperationthat Snowden had copied from the administrative file. Beforethe story could be published, however, the Guardian policy requiredrelevant American government officials be given the opportunity torespond. Gibson made the requisite call to the White House nationalsecurity spokesperson, Caitlin Hayden, who arranged a conferencecall with the FBI’s deputy director, Sean Joyce, the NSA’s deputydirector, Chris Inglis, and Robert Litt, the legal officer for the Office ofthe Director of National Intelligence. After duly taking into accountEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 939/29/16 5:51 PM94 | how america lost its secretsthe response of these three officials, which included the admonitionby Litt that “no serious news organization would publish this,” Gibsongave the green light to publish the story.The story broke on June 6. “NSA Collecting Phone Records ofMillions of Verizon Customers Daily,” proclaimed the Guardianheadline. Under Greenwald’s byline, it said, “Exclusive: Top secretcourt order requiring Verizon to hand over all call data shows scaleof domestic surveillance under Obama.” Along with it was the FISAorder. The PRISM story broke hours later in The Washington Post.Written by Gellman and Poitras, it claimed that the NSA and theFBI were tapping directly into the central servers of nine leadingU.S. Internet companies, which were knowingly participating in theoperation. The latter allegation turned out to be not entirely true,because some of the Internet companies cited in the story deniedthat they had knowingly participated. The back- to- back publicationof these two stories by The Guardian and the Post, however, providedthe explosive “shock,” at least in the global media, that Snowden hadpredicted.Snowden’s identity had not been revealed in either the Guardianor the Post story on June 6. Snowden, however, insisted on outinghimself. He explained to Greenwald that he needed to “define himself”before the U.S. government “demonized” him as a spy. Thatself- definition would be accomplished by a twelve- minute videotitled “Whistleblower.” Poitras extracted much of the material forthe video from the twenty or so hours she had shot. In the filmedinterview, Snowden voiced many of the same statements he hadmade in his manifesto, so he no longer needed to post that on theInternet. When he insisted on the immediate airing of the video,Greenwald told him that by going public in this way, he was saying“fuck you” to the American government. Snowden replied, “I wantto identify myself as the person behind these disclosures.”On June 9, the video was posted on the Guardian website with theFreedom of the Press Foundation getting an on- screen credit. “Myname is Ed Snowden,” the extraordinary disclosure began. He thendescribed how the NSA was watching U.S. citizens. Even though theNSA press spokesperson subsequently disputed some of his moredramatic claims, such as his assertion that he had the authority atEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 949/29/16 5:51 PMWhistle- blower | 95the NSA “to wiretap anyone, even the president,” the press largelyaccepted his claims as established facts. As for American surveillance,he declared, “I don’t want to live in a society that does those sorts ofthings.”The Guardian story accompanying the video carried the headline“Edward Snowden: The Whistleblower Behind the NSA SurveillanceRevelations.” Overnight, Snowden became a global celebrityand, to much of the world, a hero.The next morning he packed his belongings into a backpack andmoved, without notifying the front desk, to another room Poitrashad rented at the Mira. Complicated schemes, especially when theyinvolve transferring state secrets to unauthorized parties in a foreigncountry, do not necessarily go as planned. That was true ofSnowden’s escape plan. Snowden had no plan to stay put and facethe music. On the morning of June 10, though, there was apparentlya problem. Robert Tibbo and Jonathan Man, the lawyers who, alongwith Albert Ho, had been retained for Snowden by an unidentifiedparty, received an emergency phone call early in the morning tellingthem to help Snowden move to a safe location. Although Tibbowould not identify the person who had called, the message had beenrelayed to Man and him through Ho’s office. When Tibbo calledSnowden offering to help him move, Snowden told him, “I can makemyself unrecognizable.”Tibbo and Man immediately proceeded to the mall adjacent tothe Mira hotel, where they met Snowden. After he signed a documentappointing Ho’s law firm as his “legal adviser,” the three ofthem slipped out via the mall exit. Tibbo and Man planned to moveSnowden to the apartments of refugees who were their clients.Snowden’s credit card had been frozen, so it is not clear whopaid his sizable hotel bill. According to hotel records, it was paidby another credit card. Poitras, who had taken a room at the hotel,might have used her own credit card, or Snowden might have hadanother benefactor in Hong Kong. In any case, the lawyers escortedSnowden to a prearranged residence.“I am in a safe house for now,” Snowden wrote to Greenwald onJune 11. The situation might not have been totally under his control,because he added, “But I have no idea how safe it is.”Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 959/29/16 5:51 PM96 | how america lost its secretsGreenwald flew back to Brazil that day. Soon afterward, he wouldresign from The Guardian. In February 2014, he became the cofoundingeditor of The Intercept, an online publication dedicated toinvestigative journalism, which was backed by the Internet billionairePierre Omidyar.Poitras remained in Hong Kong, where she moved, along with theGuardian reporter MacAskill, to the five- star Sheraton Hong KongHotel & Towers, which, like the Mira hotel, was on Nathan Road inKowloon. The Guardian paid the bill. Her next task was to set upwhat turned out to be Snowden’s final interview in Hong Kong. Itwas scheduled for June 12.The journalist chosen was Lana Lam, a young Australian reporterworking for the South China Morning Post. Tibbo had suggestedLam to Snowden. She had served as Tibbo’s outlet on previous newsstories, and, as he told me, he found her to be a totally reliable journalist.He brought her to Poitras’s suite at the Sheraton in Kowloon.First, Lam had to agree to the conditions of the interview, whichincluded submitting the story to Poitras for Snowden’s approval.Next, as Lam put it, Poitras “confiscated” her cell phone. Finally,after a ten- minute wait, Poitras took her to another room and sather before a black laptop. The laptop, which had a Tor sticker on it,had on its screen an online chat room where she was connected byPoitras to Snowden.“Hi Lana, thanks for coming for this,” Snowden said from his safehouse. He told her that the NSA had intercepted data from at leastsixty- one thousand different computers in Hong Kong, China, andelsewhere. To expose what he called America’s “hypocrisy” in accusingChina of cyber espionage, he supplied her with relevant NSAdocuments. “Last week the American government happily operatedin the shadows with no respect for the consent of the governed, butno longer,” he said. “The United States government has committed atremendous number of crimes against Hong Kong [and] the People’sRepublic of China as well.” Under Poitras’s close supervision, Lamwas allowed to ask Snowden more questions about the NSA’s interceptionof communications in Hong Kong and China. He told her, “Ihave had many opportunities to flee Hong Kong, but I would ratherEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 969/29/16 5:51 PMWhistle- blower | 97stay and fight the United States government in the courts.” That bitof braggadocio would not be proven out.Greenwald, Poitras, and MacAskill in their reporting did notconcern themselves with any of the mechanics of the largest theftof top secret documents in the history of the United States. In theentire filmed interview at the Mira hotel, for example, they did notask their source how he managed to get access to the documents.Lam, however, asked him about how he widened his access. Whenshe asked him why he had switched jobs from Dell to Booz AllenHamilton in March 2013, his answer provided her with a real scoop:“My position with Booz Allen Hamilton granted me access to listsof machines all over the world the NSA hacked.” Snowden told herthat he deliberately went to Booz Allen Hamilton to get access tothe “lists” revealing the NSA’s sources in foreign countries. Thisadmission could further complicate his legal situation in Hong Kongbecause it suggested that he meant to steal documents even beforehe had known their content. In fact, to protect himself, he restrictedLam from publishing this part of the interview until after he haddeparted Hong Kong. (It was not published until June 24, a day afterhe arrived in Russia.) This condition indicated to Lam that as earlyas June 12, if not before, he was planning on leaving Hong Kong.His interview with Lam didn’t reveal how he had learned aboutthese “lists” before taking the job. Nor did he reveal to her what heplanned to do with these lists. He made it clear to her, however, thathe had not disposed of all his secret documents. “If I have time to gothrough this information,” he said, “I would like to make it availableto journalists in each country to make their own assessment,independent of my bias, as to whether or not the knowledge of USnetwork operations against their people should be published.” So aslate as June 12, Snowden was still reading and assessing the files hehad stolen from the NSA four weeks earlier.Poitras vetted the Lam interview. Soon afterward, she suspectedthat she was being followed. That was likely, because by June 14 allthe intelligence services in Hong Kong knew that she was in contactwith Snowden.“I was being tailed,” Poitras recalled in an interview with a VogueEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 979/29/16 5:51 PM98 | how america lost its secretsreporter in Berlin in 2014. “The risks became very great,” she said indescribing her situation in Hong Kong. So, on June 15, she left HongKong and flew back to Berlin, where she began editing her footageof the Snowden interview.Meanwhile, Snowden, organizing his own exit from Hong Kong,placed a call to Julian Assange.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 989/29/16 5:51 PMc h a p t e r 11Enter AssangeThanks to Russia (and thanks to WikiLeaks), Snowden remainsfree.— julian assange, Newsweek, 2015Julian assange had made a brilliant career of trafficking instate, military, and corporate secrets. Born on July 3, 1971, inQueensland, Australia, Assange began his hacking career while stilla teenager. Using the alias Mendax (“the untruthful one”), he hadhacked into the computers of the Pentagon, the U.S. Navy, NASA,Citibank, Lockheed Martin, and Australia’s Overseas TelecommunicationsCommission before he was twenty. At the age of twenty- five,he pleaded guilty to twenty- five charges of hacking in Australia butwas released on a good behavior bond. In 2006, with the spread ofTor software, he co- founded WikiLeaks, a website in which secretdocuments could be anonymously sent and posted. The site receivedlittle public attention until Bradley Manning sent it several hundredthousand lowly classified U.S. military and State Departmentdocuments in April 2010. With these stolen documents, WikiLeaksbecame a media sensation, and Assange, the runner- up for Time’sMan of the Year for 2010, became a leading figure, along with Appelbaum,in the global hacktivist underground.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 999/29/16 5:51 PM100 | how america lost its secretsIn November 2010, however, he ran into a legal problem inSweden. A judge in Stockholm ordered his detention on suspicionof rape, sexual molestation, and unlawful coercion. He denied thecharges but was arrested in London on a European arrest warrant. InDecember, he was released on a $312,700 bail deposit (supplied byhis supporters) and confined to Ellingham Hall in Norfolk, England.While awaiting the outcome of the extradition proceedings, he livedthere with Sarah Harrison, his twenty- eight- year- old deputy atWikiLeaks. A graduate of the elite Sevenoaks School in Kent, Harrisonserved as Assange’s liaison with the outside world. Although shewas officially given the title “investigative editor” of WikiLeaks, sheworked so closely with Assange during this period that the Britishpress carried stories saying she was his paramour. Harrison workedon a WikiLeaks documentary titled Mediastan, which concernedWikiLeaks’s exposure of U.S. secret operations in Russia and otherparts of the former Soviet Union. It was a project that took her toRussia and provided her with a multi- entry Russian visa.In June 2012, after the extradition order was upheld, Assangejumped bail and fled to the Ecuador embassy in London. For the nextyear, his only visible means of income was a weekly program fromthe embassy. It was sponsored in 2012 by RT television, a Moscowbased,English- language news channel funded by the Russian government,which would also finance and release Mediastan. Thissponsorship suggests that the Russian government saw potentialvalue in the document- gathering activities of WikiLeaks.Snowden telephoned Assange at his refuge at the Ecuadorembassy on June 10, 2013. According to Assange, Snowden neededhelp for his exit plan. He wanted Assange to use WikiLeaks’s“resources” to get him out of Hong Kong. Assange considered it asurprising request, because Snowden had not given any of the stolendocuments to WikiLeaks. In their discussion, according to Assange,Snowden claimed that one reason he decided to take the secret NSAdocuments was the brutal treatment of Bradley Manning after hewas arrested in 2010 by the U.S. government. “Snowden told methey had abused Manning in a way that contributed to his decisionto become a whistle- blower,” Assange said in an interview in 2015.If Manning’s mistreatment was Snowden’s motive, it was a sharpEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1009/29/16 5:51 PMEnter Assange | 101departure from the position Snowden had taken in his postings onthe Ars Technica site in January 2009. He complained in a post thereabout the detrimental consequences to U.S. intelligence of leakers’revealing “classified shit” to The New York Times, and he suggestedas punishment “those people should be shot in the balls.” Either hehad a change of heart, or he was telling Assange what he believed hewanted to hear.Assange counseled Snowden to go directly to Russia. “My advicewas that he should take asylum in Russia despite the negative PRconsequences,” he told the London Times in 2015. He said, “Snowdenwas well aware of the spin that would be put on it if he took asylumin Russia.” So a story would be released presumably by WikiLeaks,coinciding with his departure, asserting that Snowden was “boundfor the republic of Ecuador via a safe route.” When Snowden askedhow he would carry out the plan, Assange told him that he wouldimmediately dispatch one of his senior staff members to help himengineer his escape to Russia. That senior staff member was SarahHarrison.After speaking to Snowden, Assange called Harrison, who was inMelbourne. She had gone there a month earlier to help organizeAssange’s somewhat quixotic election campaign for president ofAustralia. Assange told her to forget the campaign and go to HongKong. She was to use WikiLeaks’s resources to save Snowden from “alifetime in prison.” Presumably, Assange told her that he had advisedSnowden to proceed to Russia. Harrison later said that she didn’teven bother to pack her clothing after hearing from Assange. Shecaught the next plane to Hong Kong and arrived there on June 11—the same day that Snowden texted Greenwald he was in a safe houseand before Snowden’s explosive interview with Lam. Harrison hadher own connections in Hong Kong. Her two younger sisters, Kateand Alexandra, lived there and were part of the expatriate community.She also had an older brother, Simon, who headed Avra, a shipbrokerage and commodity trading company, headquartered in Singapore,but he frequently traveled to Hong Kong on business.Like Poitras, Sarah Harrison took great care to shield her movements.She did not have a Twitter, Facebook, or any other social mediaaccount. She did not own a cell phone for fear of being tracked by anEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1019/29/16 5:51 PM102 | how america lost its secretsintelligence service. When she traveled, she bought “burner” phoneslocally and disposed of them before any calls could be traced back toher. Upon arriving in Hong Kong, she avoided meeting Snowdenface- to- face out of concern about the surveillance of American intelligencethere. Instead, for thirteen days in Hong Kong she workedthrough intermediaries. Her task was not only to arrange Snowden’sescape route but also to create diversions to camouflage his real destination.Under Assange’s tutelage, she had made deceptive ploys anintegral part of her tradecraft. “We were working very hard to lay asmany false trails as possible,” she later told an interviewer in Berlin.According to Assange, she booked decoy flights for Snowden toBeijing and New Delhi. She also used Snowden’s credit card numberto pay for the flight to India; because the card was blocked, she knewthere was a high probability that it would come to the attention ofU.S. intelligence. According to Harrison, she booked no fewer thana dozen such decoy tickets to confuse Snowden’s possible pursuersin U.S. intelligence. The only actual ticket she bought for Snowden,according to an Aeroflot official, was one to Moscow at the last minute.She bought a ticket for herself on the same flight, leaving onJune 23.The source of the money for the Assange- Harrison operation isunclear. Subsequently, Harrison said she was setting up secret bankaccounts to help organize such transborder escapes. Assange said shewas using “WikiLeaks’s resources.” Harrison said the “WikiLeaksteam” helped fund Snowden’s flight to Russia from Hong Kong, aswell as her own flight there. But WikiLeaks was not an organizationwith spare cash in June 2013. Assange had forfeited his own bail byfleeing to the embassy of Ecuador, offending many of his financialsupporters in Britain. He had also all but exhausted his bank account.Aside from money that dribbled in from Poitras’s six- month- oldFreedom of the Press Foundation, the only steady source of fundsfor WikiLeaks in 2013 was the previously mentioned paymentsAssange received from the Russian government’s RT television.Mounting pressure was brought on the Hong Kong governmentto take action against Snowden. On June 16, the U.S. governmentinformed the Hong Kong authorities that it had filed a criminalcomplaint against Snowden and would be seeking his extradition.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1029/29/16 5:51 PMEnter Assange | 103Because Hong Kong had a vigorously enforced extradition agreementwith the United States, as mentioned above, it was expectedthat Snowden would be taken into custody. But China had the finalsay in any extradition decision. In fact, China had explicitly beengiven the right of vetoing any extraditions for any reason in theformal 1999 agreement between Hong Kong and the United States.Because the Chinese president, Xi Jinping, had just met with PresidentObama in California, China also had an interest in avoidingembarrassing public demonstrations on behalf of Snowden. Accordingto a well- placed official in Hong Kong, China’s liaison office inHong Kong told the Hong Kong Authority in no uncertain termsthat Snowden had to be out of Hong Kong by June 23.On June 19, Snowden had a meeting with Tibbo, the barrister whowould handle any eventual court case, and Man and Ho, the HongKong solicitors who had been retained for him. It took place in asmall apartment where, according to Ho, they ate pizza while theydiscussed Snowden’s options.Tibbo wanted Snowden to remain in Hong Kong, allow himselfto be arrested, seek bail, and fight extradition in court. Tibbo saidhe planned to mount a powerful legal defense against extraditionby using a provision in Hong Kong’s extradition treaty with theUnited States that protects fugitives from persecution on politicalgrounds. After he told Snowden that it would entail a long courtbattle, Snowden asked him if he could avoid even being arrested.Tibbo explained that Hong Kong courts, which closely followBritish law, would certainly issue an arrest warrant for him immediatelyafter the United States formally filed charges against him.Those charges could come within hours, he reckoned. Soon afterward,Snowden would be temporarily jailed, and his computers,electronic gear, and thumb drives would be seized and placed in thecustody of the court. Tibbo would immediately seek his release onbail but could not guarantee an outcome because Snowden, whohad fled U.S. jurisdiction, might be considered a flight risk. If so,Snowden could remain incarcerated during the long court battle.During the litigation, Snowden would have a platform to makehis case against U.S. surveillance. Indeed, Tibbo’s strategy involvedbuilding massive public support for Snowden’s cause. Once the U.S.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1039/29/16 5:51 PM104 | how america lost its secretsgovernment filed charges, though, Snowden could further expect itwould invalidate his passport to go anywhere except for his return tothe United States, and Interpol would issue a red alert to all its members.Because his case involved national security secrets, he had alsoto consider that the Hong Kong court could deny him any use of theInternet until his extradition case was settled. If Snowden wanted toleave Hong Kong, he had to act swiftly.Tibbo, although evasive on the point when I interviewed him,might not have known about the escape Harrison was planning. Hedid not know that Snowden’s other alternatives were not good. Hehad no money, and his credit card had been blocked. He had no visasto go to any other country, and Interpol would issue its own borderalert as soon as the United States filed its charges. At that point,Hong Kong airport authorities would be officially notified and couldprevent him from leaving the city. Even if he somehow got out, hewould be an international fugitive. Tibbo counseled Snowden to seekredress in the Hong Kong courts.Snowden, though, had no intention of allowing himself to bearrested. Despite what he had told Lana Lam only one week earlier,at least for publication, about his determination to seek justice inthe Hong Kong courts, he had not planned to use Hong Kong asanything more than a temporary stopover on his escape route. Twomonths later and safely in Moscow, he made this point clear in alengthy interview with Alan Rusbridger, the editor of The Guardian.He told him that it had never been part of his plan to use HongKong to escape the legal consequences of his act. “The purpose of mymission [to Hong Kong] was to get the information to journalists.”If so, he had merely been using Tibbo, Man, and Ho to provide himwith temporary cover while, following the instructions of Assange,Harrison laid down the smoke screen for his escape to Moscow.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1049/29/16 5:51 PMc h a p t e r 12FugitiveIf I end up in chains in Guantánamo, I can live with that.— edward snowden, Hong Kong, 2013During his interviews with Poitras and Greenwald in June,Snowden said stoically, “If I am arrested, I am arrested.” Hisfatalistic words notwithstanding, Snowden had made plans to seeka haven from American justice well before his meeting them. Asearly as May 24, 2013, he had suggested to Barton Gellman thathe was making arrangements with a foreign government. To thatend, he asked Gellman to insert an encrypted key in the Internetversion of the NSA exposé that Snowden proposed he write for TheWashington Post. He told him the purpose of the encrypted key wasto assist him with a foreign government. Snowden did not identifyany foreign government to Gellman, but Gellman said he knewthat Snowden wanted to “seek asylum” overseas. He decided againstassisting him. “I can’t help him evade U.S. jurisdiction— I don’t wantto, and I can’t,” he later explained. “It’s not my job. It’s not the relationship.I am a journalist.”Although Gellman suspected that Iceland might be the foreigngovernment in question, Snowden, as it turned out, had never con-Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1059/29/16 5:51 PM106 | how america lost its secretstacted the consulate of Iceland while he was in Hong Kong. “We hadheard nothing from Snowden,” an Iceland government official toldVanity Fair.Snowden also did not contact the government of Ecuador whilein Hong Kong. In mid- June, while Harrison was laying down falsetracks for Snowden in Hong Kong, Assange in London asked FidelNarváez, who was a friend of his and the legal attaché in the Londonembassy of Ecuador, to issue a document that Snowden coulduse. But this document was not delivered to Snowden in Hong Kong(and it was later invalidated by Ecuador). There are no direct flightsto Ecuador from Hong Kong. If Snowden had really planned to go toEcuador without stopping in a country allied with the United States,he would have had to fly to Cuba. He would need a Cuban traveldocument to do that, which he could have obtained from the Cubanconsulate anytime during his month in Hong Kong. But he did notobtain it. Nor did he acquire a visa to go to any other country inLatin America or elsewhere while in Hong Kong. So where was heheaded?Whatever foreign government with which Snowden was dealingearlier presumably did not have an extradition treaty with theUnited States. Almost all other countries that did not have activeextradition treaties with the United States could not be directlyreached by air. With three notable exceptions, the flights to most ofthese countries had stopovers in a country that was an ally of theUnited States, where officials could seize Snowden. The three exceptionswere China, North Korea (via China), and Russia.The only one of these three countries that Snowden is knownto have had contact with directly during his thirty- three- day stayin Hong Kong was Russia. The Russian president, Vladimir Putin,revealed these contacts in a televised press briefing in September2013. Putin did not provide the date of these contacts, but he providedan intriguing clue. Snowden was identified to him, accordingto Putin, not by name but merely as an “agent of special services.”If his name was not given to Putin, it might have been becauseSnowden’s first meeting with the Russians had taken place beforeSnowden became a household name on June 9, 2013.For his part, Snowden was evasive when discussing his con-Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1069/29/16 5:51 PMFugitive | 107tacts with Russia while still in Hong Kong. When Lana Lam askedSnowden on June 12, 2013, whether he had already requested asylumfrom the Russian government, he deferred, saying, “My onlycomment is that I am glad there are governments that refuse to beintimidated by great power.” The Russian government was clearlynot intimidated by the threats of reprisals by the United States, asthe Obama administration would learn after Snowden’s arrival inRussia on June 23. Snowden could only have known that with certaintyon June 12 if he had been in contact with Russian officialsprior to his interview with Lam.If Putin’s own description of Snowden’s interactions with theRussians in Hong Kong is to be believed, the decision to facilitateSnowden’s escape to Russia had been kicked all the way up the Russianchain of command to Putin. Presumably, this decision- makingprocess began earlier than June 21, when Snowden was said to havegone to the consulate. But how much earlier? Because Snowden hadarrived in Hong Kong on May 20, his contacts with Russian officialscould have occurred in May. Such a contact with the Russianswould fit with Snowden’s telling Gellman on May 24 that he neededhis help in dealing with the diplomatic mission of a country thatSnowden did not identify.In any case, Putin said an American “agent of the special services”had contacted Russian diplomats because he wanted assistance. Theagent, Snowden, of course, needed assistance to escape from HongKong. The decision to accept him in Russia, given the internationalramifications, would have to be made at a much higher level than theRussian mission in Hong Kong.Nine days before Snowden boarded Aeroflot Flight SU213 toMoscow on June 23, the United States had filed a criminal complaintagainst him. It had also officially alerted Interpol when it unsealedthe complaint on June 21. It had invalidated his U.S. passport exceptto return to America (although he still had it in his possession atthe Hong Kong airport). Because by this time he was the mostfamous visitor in Hong Kong, his passage through passport controlon June 23 might have reflected the acquiescence of the Hong Kongauthorities to the reported request of China to be rid of Snowden bythat date.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1079/29/16 5:51 PM108 | how america lost its secretsAccording to one Aeroflot official, ordinarily all international passengersare required to have a valid passport as well as a visa to thecountry of final destination. Snowden had neither a valid passportnor a visa. Still Snowden was able to board the flight to Moscow.Aeroflot, a state- controlled airline, presumably responds to the Russiangovernment on matters where Putin has given his approval.Snowden first met Harrison in person on June 23. She was waitingfor him in the car that Jonathan Man had arranged to take himto the airport that morning. Snowden was dressed in a gray shirtand khaki slacks. Harrison was dressed in jeans and flip- flops. Shesaid she had chosen this dress style so that they would blend in atthe airport with vacationing tourists. She had financed the trip, andshe was apparently now calling the shots. Harrison’s concern wasthat they might be arrested at the airport, so Man accompanied themthrough passport control. He was able to do this because he boughta ticket on the cheapest available international flight. Harrison hadgiven Man a phone number to call if they got arrested. When sheand Snowden boarded the flight at 12:45 p.m., Harrison effectivelybecame Snowden’s second “carer”— a job that would require herpresence in Moscow for the next four months.Snowden had pretty much remained silent until the plane tookoff. The first full proper sentence she heard from him as they headedfor Moscow, as she recalled, was “I didn’t expect that WikiLeaks wasgoing to send a ninja to get me out.”Meanwhile, Assange continued creating “distractions,” as he putit. On June 24, a booking was made for Snowden on an Aeroflotflight to Cuba, and this information was relayed to the foreign pressorganization in Moscow, resulting in over a dozen reporters flyingto Havana on the flight. Snowden, of course, never showed up for it.“In some of our communications, we deliberately spoke about that[flight] on open lines to lawyers in the United States,” Assange said.One subsequent piece of his misinformation was that Snowden wasflying to Bolivia on the private plane of the Bolivian president, EvoMorales (who was then in Moscow for a meeting). That misinformationhad the desired effect. U.S. allies in Europe, including France,Spain, and Portugal, refused to allow that plane to fly through itsairspace, forcing the plane to land in Austria. This misinformationEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1089/29/16 5:51 PMFugitive | 109resulted in an international incident but did not change the fact thatSnowden was still in the custody of Russian authorities.Snowden came to realize that those assisting him, includingAssange and Harrison, were taking serious risks. “Anyone in a threemileradius [of me] is going to get hammered,” he later said in 2015to a reporter from Vogue. (After finally leaving Snowden in Moscowon November 3, 2013, Harrison moved to Berlin, where she set upan organization to provide, as she termed it, “an underground railroad”for other fugitives who had made available documents exposinggovernment secrets.)Snowden was sequestered in the transit zone of the Moscow airportfor thirty- seven days. A Russian intermediary provided himwith a Russian classic to read while awaiting asylum. It was FyodorDostoyevsky’s Crime and Punishment, whose protagonist, RodionRomanovich Raskolnikov, is a dissenter who believes breaking thelaw is morally justified by the unfair abuses of the political system.Snowden received official sanctuary in Russia on August 1, 2013.His public statements in Hong Kong that he was willing to go toprison so that others could live freely in a democratic society were,as it turned out, mere rhetoric. Instead of risking prison, he had successfullyescaped to a country in which he would be treated as a herofor defying the U.S. government. He had not sacrificed himself; hehad transformed himself. He had risen from being a lowly technicianin Hawaii whose talents went largely unrecognized to the statusof an international media star in Moscow. In his new role, he couldmake Internet appearances via Skype to prestigious gatherings, suchas the TED conference, where he would be roundly applauded as anInternet hero, as well as be paid a $20,000 fee for just his electronicparticipation. He would be beamed into dozens of ACLU meetingswhere he was celebrated as a defender of American liberty. He woulddescribe to sympathetic audiences in Germany, Norway, and Francethe unfairness of the American legal system, asserting that it wasdenying him a “fair trial.” He would now make front- page newsby granting interviews to The New York Times, The WashingtonPost, The Nation, and other publications. He would join Poitras andGreenwald on the board of directors of the Freedom of the PressFoundation. He would be the subject of an Oscar- winning documen-Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1099/29/16 5:51 PM110 | how america lost its secretstary, the hero of the 2016 Hollywood movie Snowden (directed byOliver Stone), and a consultant to the 2015 season of the televisionseries Homeland. He would be nominated for the Nobel PeacePrize in 2014. He would attract over one million followers to histweets in 2015. “For me, in terms of personal satisfaction, the mission’salready accomplished. I already won,” he informed the Postin his first live interview in Moscow in December 2013. It was amission that involved a very high- stakes enterprise: taking not onlydomestic surveillance documents but America’s military and foreignintelligence secrets abroad.Whistle- blowers do not ordinarily steal military secrets. Nor dothey flee to the territory of America’s principal adversaries. A fugitive,especially one lacking a Russian visa, does not wind up in Moscowby pure accident. It’s hard to imagine that a Russian presidentwith the KGB background of Putin would give his personal sanctionfor a high- profile exfiltration from Hong Kong without weighingthe gain that might proceed from it. Whatever else may be said ofPutin, his actions show him to be a calculating opportunist. Part ofhis calculus would be that the defector from American intelligencehad taken possession of a great number of potentially valuable documentsfrom the inner sanctum of the NSA and, aside from thesedocuments, claimed to hold secrets of great importance in his head.To be sure, the practical value of this stolen archive would requirea lengthy evaluation by Russia’s other intelligence services. But itis hard to believe that a defector who put himself in the hands ofthe FSB, the successor to the KGB, and other Russian intelligenceservices wouldn’t be expected to cooperate with them. Even if sucha defector did not carry these files with him to Moscow, intelligenceservices have the means to recover digital files, even after they areerased from a computer or if they are sent to the cloud. Moreover,once secret documents are taken, they are compromised. Yet formuch of the American public, Snowden remained a hero.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1109/29/16 5:51 PMpart twoTHE INTELLIGENCE CRISISWhat you’ve seen so far [in the Snowden theft of documents]is just the tip of the iceberg.—retired admiral michael mcconnell,vice- chairman, Booz Allen Hamilton, 2013Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1119/29/16 5:51 PMEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1129/29/16 5:51 PMc h a p t e r 13The Great DivideThat moral decision to tell the public about spying that affects allof us has been costly, but it was the right thing to do and I haveno regrets.— edward snowden, Moscow, 2013In the twelve- minute video on The Guardian’s website,Snowden correctly identified himself as an infrastructure analystat a regional base of the National Security Agency in Oahu, Hawaii.He also revealed in a calm, unemotional voice that he had been thesource for the stories in both The Guardian and The WashingtonPost. He said that he had supplied the secret, classified documentsthat the two newspapers had used in their scoops about domesticsurveillance being conducted by the NSA, America’s enormous electronicsurveillance agency. These sensational revelations had been,literally, the talk of the world, and now, in another major news event,the boyish- looking Snowden took responsibility for what wouldturn out to be the largest theft of top secret documents in the historyof U.S. intelligence.In the video, it will be recalled, Glenn Greenwald, who had brokenthe NSA story in The Guardian, questioned Snowden. Whatwas his motive? Greenwald asked. Why did he do it? Snowdenreplied that he had become horrified by the NSA’s secret operations,Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1139/29/16 5:51 PM114 | how america lost its secretswhich, to him, represented a kind of distillation of the excesses ofthe American national security state, and he had therefore made ithis mission to blow the whistle. He believed that the public neededto be informed of the existence of a vast, secret surveillance operationdirected against tens of millions of Americans that flagrantlyviolated U.S. laws and was a grave threat to their privacy and theirfreedoms. Within hours of the release of that video on the Guardianwebsite, Snowden was known throughout the world as a courageouswhistle- blower.In Laura Poitras’s remarks in accepting her Academy Award forCitizenfour on February 22, 2015, she said that Snowden acted as awhistle- blower not only to “expose a threat to our privacy but to ourdemocracy itself.” She received a standing ovation.A large part of the public who viewed this powerful film, includingmany of my colleagues in journalism whose writing I greatlyrespect, came to accept Snowden’s whistle- blowing narrative. Thefilm so convincingly depicted Snowden as an altruistic young manwilling to risk his own personal freedom and face years of imprisonmentfor the sake of others that editorial writers asked that he begiven clemency from prosecution.“Sitting on his unmade bed— white sheets and covers, white headboard,white bathrobe, white skin— Snowden seems like a figurein some obscure ritual, being readied for sacrifice,” George Packerwrote about the film in a widely read article in The New Yorker.This powerful narrative, as lucidly articulated by Poitras, Greenwald,and other Snowden supporters, described the NSA activitiesexposed by Snowden as part of a vast criminal conspiracy involving,among others, President Obama, James Clapper, the director ofnational intelligence, and both Democratic and Republican membersof the congressional oversight committees. It further derided anyclaims that there was evidence that Snowden’s theft of NSA secretswent beyond simply exposing government misdeeds. For example,this narrative asserted, as if it were established fact, that U.S. governmentofficials had deliberately “trapped” Snowden in Russia.According to Snowden, the purpose of this government ploy wasto “demonize” him. “There was no question that I was going to besubject to a demonization campaign,” Snowden said in an interviewEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1149/29/16 5:51 PMThe Great Divide | 115from Moscow, “They [Greenwald and Poitras] actually recorded meon camera saying this before I revealed my identity.” The purposeof this demonization was to divert attention from the government’sown crimes.To be sure, it is not unprecedented for the government to releasedefamatory information about individuals who have embarrassedU.S. intelligence by defecting. When two NSA analysts, WilliamMartin and Bernon Mitchell, defected to Russia in the 1960s andaccused the NSA of violating international law after arriving inMoscow, U.S. government officials responded by putting out thestory that they were homosexual lovers, which was both untrue andirrelevant to the intelligence secrets that they had compromised. Itis certainly possible that the government put out information tointentionally defame Snowden. Secretary of State John Kerry characterizedhim as a coward who should “man up” by returning to theUnited States.While one can discount such characterizations against Snowdenby government officials as demonization, as I do, one cannot as easilydismiss the independent evidence that undermines Snowden’sassertion that his sole motive was blowing the whistle on illicit surveillancein the United States. For example, in 2014, the LawfareInstitute, a nonprofit organization that publishes a blog on nationalsecurity concerns, in cooperation with the Brookings Institution,did an independent analysis of all the published documents thatSnowden provided to the media. It concluded that with some notableexceptions, such as the two documents initially published by TheGuardian and the Post, the now- famous FISA Verizon warrant andthe PRISM slides, few of the other documents that Snowden hadgiven Poitras and Greenwald for publication had anything to dowith either domestic surveillance or infringements on the privacy ofAmericans. By the Lawfare Institute’s count, 32 of Snowden’s leaksto these journalists concerned the NSA’s overseas sources and methods,9 identified overseas locations of the NSA’s intelligence bases,25 revealed the identities of foreign officials of interest to U.S. intelligenceagencies, 14 disclosed information about Internet companieslegally cooperating with the NSA, and 19 concerned technologyproducts that the NSA had been using or researching.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1159/29/16 5:51 PM116 | how america lost its secretsSome secret methods that Snowden made public compromisedthe NSA’s state- of- the- art technology of which adversaries hadbeen unaware. For example, the NSA had devised an ingenious technologyin 2008 for tapping into computers abroad that had been“air- gapped,” or intentionally isolated from any network to protecthighly sensitive information, such as missile telemetry, nuclear bombdevelopment, and cyber- warfare capabilities. The secret method thatthe NSA used involved surreptitiously implanting speck- sized circuitboards into air- gapped computers. These devices then covertlytransmitted the data back in bursts of radio waves. Once Snowdenexposed this technology, and the radio frequency transmission itused, America lost this intelligence capability.In addition, a considerable number of the published documentsdid not even belong to the NSA but were copies of reports sent tothe NSA by its allies, including the British, Australian, Canadian,French, Norwegian, and Israeli intelligence services. Snowden providedjournalists with secret documents from the British cyberservice GCHQ, describing its plans to obtain a legal warrant to penetratethe Russian computer security firm Kaspersky to expand its“computer network exploitation capability.” What the GCHQ wasrevealing in this secret document was its own capabilities to monitora Russian target of interest to British intelligence. While the releaseof these foreign documents might have embarrassed allies of theUnited States, they exposed no violations of U.S. law by the NSA. Itwas a legitimate part of the NSA’s job to share information with itsallies. This raises the question: What constitutes whistle- blowing?To the general public no doubt, a whistle- blower is simply a personwho exposes government misdeeds from inside that government.But in the eyes of the law, someone who discloses classifiedinformation to an unauthorized person, even as an act of personalconscience, is not exempt from the punitive consequences of this act.Indeed, if a person deliberately reveals secret U.S. operations, especiallyones that compromise the sources and methods of U.S. intelligenceservices, he or she may run afoul of American espionage laws.In the past, when government employees have disclosed highlyclassified information to journalists to redress perceived governmentmisconduct, they were almost always prosecuted. DuringEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1169/29/16 5:51 PMThe Great Divide | 117Barack Obama’s presidency, there were six government employeeswho, as a matter of personal conscience, shared classified informationthey obtained from the FBI, the CIA, the State Department,and the U.S. Army with journalists. They were all convicted: ShamaiLeibowitz in 2010, Chelsea Manning in 2013, John Kiriakou in2013, Donald Sachtleben in 2013, Stephen Kim in 2014, and JeffreySterling in 2014. Like Snowden, they claimed to be whistle- blowersinforming the public of government abuses. But because they disclosedclassified documents, they were dealt with as lawbreakers. Allsix were indicted, tried, convicted, and sentenced to prison. Sterling,a CIA officer who allegedly turned over a document to James Risen,a Pulitzer Prize– winning reporter for the Times, was sentenced toforty- two months. The most severe sentence was meted out to PrivateManning, whom an army court sentenced to thirty- five yearsin a military stockade, as noted earlier.The prison time that others received did not go unnoticed bySnowden. He had been following the Manning case since 2012. Infact, he posted about it shortly before he began stealing far moredamaging documents than Manning had. He would therefore likelyhave been aware that by revealing state secrets he had sworn to protect,he would be risking imprisonment unless, unlike Manning, hefled the country. His motives, no matter how noble they might be,would not spare him— any more than they spared the other six—from determined federal prosecution.The view of those on the Snowden side of the divide is groundednot in legal definitions but in a broader notion of morality. Snowden’ssupporters do not accept that the law should be applied to Snowdenin this fashion. A writer for The New Yorker termed it “an act ofcivil disobedience.” His supporters argue that Snowden had a moralimperative to act, even if it meant breaking the law. They fully accepthis view that he had a higher duty to protect citizens of all countriesin the world from, as he put it, “secret pervasive surveillance.”That higher duty transcended any narrower legal definitions of lawbreaking.Ben Wizner, a lawyer from the American Civil LibertiesUnion who has represented Snowden since October 2013, arguesthat Snowden’s taking of classified documents was an “act of conscience”that overrode any legal constraints because it “revitalizedEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1179/29/16 5:51 PM118 | how america lost its secretsdemocratic oversight in the U.S.” and, without question, caused amuch- needed debate on government surveillance.In this ends- justify- the- means view, any person with access togovernment secrets can authorize him- or herself to reveal thosesecrets to the world if she or he believes it serves the public good.Further, because doing so would be an “act of conscience,” he or sheshould be immune from legal prosecution.For Snowden’s supporters, his “act of conscience” justifies hisclaim to being a whistle- blower, even though the preponderance ofthe secrets he disclosed had to do with the NSA’s authorized activityof using its multibillion- dollar global arrays of sensors to interceptdata in foreign countries. For example, one of the thirty alliedintelligence services that the NSA cooperated with in 2013 was thecyber service of Israel. Because Snowden deemed this cooperationto infringe on privacy rights, he revealed documents bearing onthe NSA’s data exchange with Israel. He subsequently told JamesBamford, in an interview in Wired magazine in August 2014, thatsupplying such intelligence to Israel was “one of the biggest abuseswe’ve seen.” Snowden therefore believed he was justified in revealinginformation concerning Arab communications in Gaza, the WestBank, and Lebanon that the NSA had provided the Israeli cyber service,known as Unit 8200. In doing so, he compromised an Israelisource. But how could this act qualify as whistle- blowing? ProvidingIsrael with such data was not some NSA rogue operation. It was partof a policy that had been approved by every American president—and every Congress— since 1948. Snowden had every right to personallydisagree with this established U.S. policy of aiding Israel withintelligence, but it is another matter to release secret documents tosupport his view. If the concept of whistle- blowing were expandedto cover intelligence workers who steal secrets because they disagreewith their government’s foreign policy, it would also have to includemany notorious spies, such as Kim Philby.Snowden’s concept of whistle- blowing also applied to the NSA’sspying on adversary nations. “We’ve crossed lines,” Snowden saidin regard to China. “We’re hacking universities and hospitals andwholly civilian infrastructure.” The NSA’s operations against Chinawere such “a real concern” for Snowden that he targeted lists ofEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1189/29/16 5:51 PMThe Great Divide | 119the NSA’s penetrations in China. Putin echoed this expansion of thewhistle- blowing concept to adversaries. He complimented Snowdenfor having “uncovered illegal acts by the United States around theglobe.” Putin’s defense of Snowden not only implied a global conceptof whistle- blowing that justifies breaking U.S. laws but also pointedto America’s double standard in publicly complaining about Russianand Chinese cyber espionage.Snowden’s whistle- blower interpretation gained immense publicresonance. Even after President Obama and leaders of both housesof Congress roundly denounced Snowden for betraying Americansecrets, the majority of the public, according to a Quinnipiac polltaken in July 2013, still considered “Snowden a whistleblower whodid a service revealing government domestic spying programs.”Moreover, Snowden’s revelations helped stoke a growing distrust ofthe American government itself. According to polls conducted bythe Pew Research Center after Snowden came forward, just 19 percentof the public said that “they can trust the government alwaysor most of the time.” The support for Snowden was not limited toAmerica. On October 29, 2015, a majority of the European Parliamentvoted to award Snowden the official status of a “human rightsdefender.”The former congressman Ron Paul went even further. He organizeda clemency petition in February 2014 for Snowden, stating,“Thanks to one man’s courageous actions, Americans know aboutthe truly egregious ways their government is spying on them,” andhis son Senator Rand Paul, who was a candidate for the Republicanpresidential nomination in 2016, called for a pardon for Snowden.Senator Paul’s concern fitted with the growing public apprehensionover increasing intrusion on privacy. Snowden was correct,in my opinion, in describing the threat of a surveillance state andthe loss of privacy as a legitimate public concern. “We actually buycell phones that are the equivalent of a network microphone thatwe carry around in our pockets voluntarily,” he pointed out fromMoscow.The very technology involved in the electronic equipment we alluse in the twenty- first century has made mass surveillance part ofour daily life. There can be little doubt that our privacy has beenEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1199/29/16 5:51 PM120 | how america lost its secretslargely eroded, if not entirely negated, by the widespread use ofcell phones, credit cards, social media, and the search engines of theInternet. When we use smart phones, our location is relayed to ourtelephone service provider every three seconds. The phone companiescollect and archive our phone usage “metadata,” which includeswhom we called and how long we spoke. When we use Googleto search for anyone or anything on the Internet, that activity iscaptured by Google, a company whose profits mainly come frommaking available to advertisers the results of its surveillance andcollection of its users’ searches. When we use Gmail, Google’s e- mailservice, used by nearly one billion senders and recipients, we agreeto allow Google to read the actual contents of our correspondence tofind keywords of interest to advertisers.When we use a credit card, the credit card company also retainsdata about what we buy and where we go. When we travel in automobilesequipped with GPS, every turn and stop is tracked andrecorded. And when we are in public places with CCTV (closedcircuittelevision) cameras, our image is recorded and archived.When we use Facebook, Twitter, and other so- called social media, asover two billion people do today, we allow these companies to collect,retain, and exploit their surveillance of our movements, associationswith other people, and stated preferences. When we use Amazon andother online stores, we allow them to track and archive a great dealof our commercial activity. For Internet companies such as Facebook,Twitter, and Yahoo!, like Google, collecting private data on hundredsof millions of their members provides them with vast searchabledatabases that are easily marketable. The exploitation of these databasesis a fundamental aspect of their business plans. Without suchsurveillance of their users, social media companies would not be ableto turn a profit. Indeed, they may be more aptly called surveillancemedia than social media. For those of us who use them to post picturesand communicate, any notion of personal privacy is largelyillusory.To be sure, there is a distinction to be made between the surveillanceof our activities to which we voluntarily agree in exchangefor the benefits and conveniences that we gain from social media,search engines, and other Internet companies and the surveillanceEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1209/29/16 5:51 PMThe Great Divide | 121done by the government, which we do not voluntarily invite— orwant. We willingly waive our privacy for corporations but not forgovernments.What the public might not fully realize, however, is that the governmentcan access all the personal information in the databases ofprivate companies if it issues a subpoena or search warrant, which itdoes often. As Snowden himself pointed out, “If Facebook is goingto hand over all of your messages, all of your wall posts, all of yourprivate photos, all of your private details from their server, the governmenthas no need to intercept all of the communications that constitutethose private records.” These Internet companies, even if theyare only interested in exploiting the data for their own profit, cannotrefuse to share this information with the NSA, the FBI, and othergovernment agencies if they have a subpoena or search warrant.That reality became evident to me in my investigation of the rapecharges brought (and subsequently dropped) against DominiqueStrauss- Kahn, the managing director of the International MonetaryFund, in 2011. Immediately after his arrest, Cyrus Vance Jr., the districtattorney of New York County, issued a subpoena for Strauss-Kahn’s cell phone records, credit card records, hotel room electronickey records, e- mails, room service bills, and the CCTV videos of hisactivities (some of which I published in my article about the casein The New York Review of Books). Nor is this access uncommon.According to Vance in 2016, his office issues thousands of such subpoenasevery year. Even though Apple made headlines by refusingto comply with a court order to help the FBI unlock the iPhone ofa dead mass murderer in 2016, it had complied with many previoussubpoenas. In fact, in 2015 alone, it quietly provided the backed- updata of some seventy- one hundred iPhone customers to governmentauthorities.If anyone doubts the pervasiveness of government data collection,consider a little- known government agency called the ConsumerFinancial Protection Bureau. Created in 2010 by Congress, it minesdata on a monthly basis from some 600 million personal credit cardaccounts, targeting about 95 percent of the credit card users in theUnited States. In addition, through eleven other data- mining programs,it gathers data on everything from private home mortgagesEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1219/29/16 5:51 PM122 | how america lost its secretsand student loans to credit scores and overdrafts in personal bankaccounts. This ubiquitous surveillance of virtually every non-cashtransaction came about because of advances in computer technologythat made it economically feasible to mine such data.Snowden’s concern about NSA domestic surveillance is certainlynot misplaced. Ever since the 9/11 attacks, the NSA has increasinglyplayed a role in this surveillance state, not by its own choice, butbecause Congress mandated it. In 2001, it empowered the NSA toobtain and archive data on American citizens. Accordingly, the NSAobtained the billing records of customers from phone and Internetcompanies and archived these records. The bulk collection of thesebilling records was intended to build a searchable database for thegovernment that could be used to trace the history of the telephoneand Internet activities in the United States of FBI- designated foreignterrorists and spies abroad. The government’s rationale for keepingthese anti-terrorist programs secret from the public was that it didnot want the foreign suspects to realize their communications inAmerica were being monitored.The public only learned that the phone company was routinelyturning over its billing records on June 6, 2013, when Snowden disclosedit to The Guardian and The Washington Post. The documentshe provided the journalists showed that the NSA had been obtainingphone records collected by Verizon every three months. Whilethis revelation might have shocked the American public, the NSAhad not acted on its own. It had acted under a warrant issued by asecret court established by Congress in 1978 as part of the ForeignIntelligence Surveillance Act for each request for records. Congressempowered the FISA court, whose judges are appointed by the president,to hear cases and authorize search warrants in secret in casesinvolving national security.As its name implies, the FISA court was meant to deal with mattersbearing on foreign intelligence activities in the United States. Thatrestriction changed after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.A month after the attacks, Congress expanded the purview of theFISA court by passing the USA Patriot Act (an acronym that standsfor Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing AppropriateTools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism). Part of theEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1229/29/16 5:51 PMThe Great Divide | 123act, Section 215, euphemistically referred to as the “library records”provision, permitted the FISA court to issue warrants authorizingsearches of records by the NSA and other federal agencies to investigateinternational terrorism or clandestine intelligence activities.Through these FISA authorizations, the NSA could obtain “tangiblethings” such as “books, records, papers, documents, and other items.”Under the interpretation of this section of the law by both the Bushand the Obama administrations, the FISA court was enabled byCongress to issue warrants to telephone companies demanding thatthey turn over to the NSA the bulk billing records of all calls madein America. The FISA court need only deem these records to be “relevant”to the FBI’s investigations of terrorists and spies.Essentially, the NSA, to create a searchable database of telephonebilling records, used the FISA court’s controversial interpretation ofthe word “relevant” in Section 215. Such a “haystack,” as the NSAcalled the national collection of billing records, could allow the FBIto instantly find missing “needles,” as this tracking was supposed towork, even if the connections were made years earlier. For example,if the FBI had a lead on a foreign suspect, it could search the databasefor any telephone calls made by the foreign suspect to telephonenumbers in America and then who those people called. TheFBI always had this power, if it obtained a warrant, but it did notpreviously have the “haystack” of records in a single database. GeneralKeith Alexander, who headed the NSA between 2005 and 2014,believed that maintaining such a haystack database made sense. “Hisapproach was, ‘Let’s collect the whole haystack,’ ” according to oneformer senior U.S. intelligence official quoted by The WashingtonPost.According to critics of NSA domestic surveillance, including theACLU, the results provided by this vast database did not justify itsimmense potential for abuse. In early May 2015, just three weeksbefore this part of the Patriot Act was set to expire, a three- judgepanel of the Second U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Yorkagreed with the ACLU position, overturning a lower court decisionthat said it was legal. The panel found that the word “relevant”in the act was not intended by Congress to justify the acquisitionand storing of the bulk records of telephone companies for possibleEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1239/29/16 5:51 PM124 | how america lost its secretsfuture use. Soon afterward, Congress replaced the Patriot Act withthe USA Freedom Act, which effectively transferred bulk storage ofbilling records from the NSA to the phone companies themselves.Despite the change in venue, the records of individuals were still notcompletely private. Under the new law, the FBI via a FISA warrantcould still search the phone company’s databases.The core of Snowden’s charge in the media was that the FISAcourt overreached its authority by issuing sweeping warrants thatallowed the NSA to obtain data collected by private phone and Internetcompanies. In the initial story published in The Guardian onJune 6, Snowden disclosed one such FISA warrant to support hischarge. It was issued by Judge Roger Vinson of the FISA court onApril 25, 2013, and ordered Verizon to turn over to the FBI all itsbilling records of landline customers for the next ninety days. TheFBI presented this FISA authorization to the NSA, which acts asa service organization for the FBI and the CIA in collecting communicationsdata. The NSA, with the FISA warrant in hand, thenobtained the Verizon billing records.Snowden also provided the Post and The Guardian with anothersecret document: a PowerPoint presentation on twenty slides, sentby the NSA to other intelligence agencies. It described a programit was using for monitoring the Internet. Its code name was theaforementioned PRISM. It was authorized under Section 702 of theForeign Intelligence Surveillance Act and was designed to collectmessages sent over the Internet from foreigners. Such informationwas in fact obtained with the knowledge of the service providers. Italso required a written directive from both the attorney general andthe director of national intelligence and a review by the Departmentof Justice every three months for each and every case. After obtainingthis data, the NSA ran programs, as required by law, to filter outall domestic Internet communications, but, as Snowden pointed out,domestic information was also accidently picked up. Whenever theJustice Department actually opened an investigation against Americansin contact with foreign suspects, as it did in 170 cases in 2013,it could obtain warrants from the FISA court to search these Americans’Internet activities.These two documents raised legitimate questions for manyEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1249/29/16 5:51 PMThe Great Divide | 125Americans, including members of Congress, about the proper roleof the FISA court, including whether it should conduct its businessin secret. If Snowden had released only these two documents thatrelated to unwarranted domestic surveillance and other possible violationsof the law by the NSA, it would be difficult for any reasonableperson not to see his actions as a potentially valuable public service.Indeed, additional safeguards were necessary in an age in which newtechnologies enabled mass surveillance of the public. As the threejudgepanel of the Second U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals would laterfind, Congress had not intended Section 215 of the Patriot Act tobe used to justify the bulk collection of American records. If he hadlimited his illegal downloading to the few documents about bulk collection,it would be more difficult to argue that he was not a whistleblowerin the spirit if not the letter of the law, and even a hero inthe struggle to preserve our civil liberties. But in fact, Snowden tooka great many other secret documents that did not bear on the civilliberties of Americans. He claimed he was acting on behalf of citizensin foreign countries by exposing the NSA’s and the CIA’s spyingoperations abroad, but that same claim could also be made by anyespionage agent stealing U.S. secrets to benefit the people of anothercountry.As a result, the Snowden case produced a great divide in theAmerican appreciation of him. On one hand, he has been almostuniversally lauded and lionized by what might be seen as the mainstreammedia, by numerous academics, and even, as we have seen,by members of Congress. The journalists who assisted him, Greenwald,Poitras, and Gellman, have been celebrated for the roles theyplayed in bringing Snowden’s revelations to the public and receivedthe 2014 Polk Award for national security reporting. The Post andThe Guardian, the newspapers that initially published the purloineddocuments, won the 2014 Pulitzer Prize for public service.In other circles, the reaction has been very different. Americanand British intelligence officials, senior members of the Obamaadministration, and members of the oversight committees of Congressdo not view Snowden as a hero or even an authentic whistleblower.Instead, they see him as a betrayer of secrets who willfullybrought damage to the United States and benefits to its adversar-Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1259/29/16 5:51 PM126 | how america lost its secretsies. The holders of this darker view of Snowden base it on classifiedreports of the full extent of the theft of classified data. Those officialsbelieve that only a handful of the tens of thousands of documents hestole involved domestic surveillance and that those few documentsserved as a cover for a much larger theft.Admiral Michael Rogers, who replaced General Alexander ashead of the NSA in March 2014, said at a public forum at PrincetonUniversity, “Edward Snowden is not the ‘whistleblower’ some havelabeled him to be.” He further explained to Congress, “Snowdenstole from the United States government a large amount of classifiedinformation, a small portion of which is germane to his apparentcentral argument regarding NSA and privacy issues.”General Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff,went even further. In testifying before the House Armed ServicesCommittee on March 6, 2014, after estimating that the Snowdenbreach could cost the military “billions” to repair, he added, “Thevast majority of the electronic documents that Snowden exfiltratedfrom our highest levels of security had nothing to do with exposinggovernment oversight of domestic activities.” Dempsey based thisassessment on a then still- secret Defense Intelligence Agency reporton the breach. The classified DIA report showed that Snowden took“over 900,000” military files from the Department of Defense inaddition to the NSA files he had taken. The Defense Departmentloss in terms of the number of files stolen actually exceeded theloss— in sheer numbers— of NSA documents. Lieutenant GeneralMike Flynn, the DIA director who directed the study, testified to theSenate Select Committee on Intelligence that the breach “has causedgrave damage to our national security.”To be sure, this was not the first time that the cryptologicalbranches of the military had been compromised. The spy ring of JohnWalker had provided thousands of the navy’s reports on breakingRussian ciphers to the KGB during the Cold War. But the Snowdenbreach exposing military sources was an order of magnitude greaterthan any past breach.The CIA’s assessment was no less grim. Morell, the deputy directorof the CIA in 2013, wrote that Snowden’s action went beyond takingthe handful of documents, such as the FISA order, “that addressedEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1269/29/16 5:51 PMThe Great Divide | 127the privacy issue.” Instead, as Morell put it, “he backed up a virtualtractor trailer and emptied a warehouse full of documents— the vastmajority of which he could not possibly have read and few of whichhe would likely understand— [and] he delivered the documents to avariety of news organizations and God knows who else.” As a result,Morell concluded, “Snowden’s disclosures will go down in historyas the greatest compromise of classified information ever.” GeneralAlexander, the head of the NSA at the time of the theft, asserted thatSnowden did “the greatest damage to our combined nations’ intelligencesystems that we have ever suffered.” Obviously, militaryintelligence officers would not be on Snowden’s side of the divide(and the Snowden breach ended the careers of many of them, includingAlexander). But political leaders in both parties could also befound on the anti- Snowden side of the divide. “I don’t look at this asbeing a whistle- blower,” the Democratic senator Dianne Feinstein ofCalifornia, the head of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said aftershe was briefed on Snowden’s theft. “I think it’s an act of treason.”The Republican representative Mike Rogers of Michigan, her counterparton the House Intelligence Committee, said on the NBC programMeet the Press that Snowden might be working for a foreignintelligence service. And a former prominent member of PresidentObama’s cabinet went even further, suggesting to me off the recordin March 2016 that there are only three possible explanations for theSnowden heist: (1) it was a Russian espionage operation; (2) it was aChinese espionage operation; (3) it was a joint Sino- Russian operation.These severe accusations generated much heat but little light.They were not accompanied by any evidence showing that Snowdenhad acted in concert with any foreign power in stealing the files or,for that matter, that he was not acting out of his own personal convictions,no matter how misguided they might have been.On this side of the divide, Snowden’s critics regard the whistleblowingnarrative as at best incomplete and at worst fodder for thenaive. They point out that the FISA document that gave him credentialsas a whistle- blower was only issued in the last week of April2013, which was four months after he first contacted Greenwald andalmost nine months after he began illegally copying secret documents.They further believe that the evidence contradicts Snowden’sEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1279/29/16 5:51 PM128 | how america lost its secretsclaims that he stole only documents that exposed NSA transgressionsinto domestic surveillance, that he turned over all the stolendocuments to journalists, and that he was forced to remain in Moscowby the actions of the U.S. government. They also find that theunprecedented size and complexity of the penetration of NSA files,compromising hundreds of thousands of secret documents pertainingto U.S. operations against adversary nations, according to theNSA’s and the Pentagon’s estimates, is not easily explained givenSnowden’s avowed purpose for his theft.The deep split in how Snowden is perceived brings to mind thefamous drawing of a duck- rabbit cartoon first published in 1900 inthe book Fact and Fable in Psychology. The figure is perceived eitheras a duck or as a rabbit, but it cannot be seen as both simultaneously.Whether a person sees a rabbit or a duck in this test may dependon the information available to that person. Similarly, what mayaccount for the sharp divide between the pro- Snowden and the anti-Snowden camps is a disparity in their available information.The pro- Snowden camp’s view is largely informed by Snowdenhimself. Snowden supporters prefer to believe his words rather thanhis actions. In the anti- Snowden camp are administration officialsand the members of the House and Senate intelligence oversightcommittees who have been at least partially briefed on the continuinginvestigations of the Snowden affair. The members of theSenate Intelligence Committee, for example, were told by DavidLeatherwood, the director of operations for the Defense IntelligenceAgency, that the military files compromised by Snowden includeddocuments bearing on military plans and weapons systems; foreigngovernments’ intelligence activities (including special activities),intelligence sources, or methods of cryptology; scientific and technologicalmatters relating to national security; and vulnerable systems,installations, infrastructures, projects, plans, and protection servicesrelated to national security and the development, production, or useof weapons of mass destruction. The members of the House andSenate Intelligence Committees, but not the public, have also beenprivy to an NSA investigation that established the chronology ofSnowden’s actions, including changing jobs, copying more than oneEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1289/29/16 5:51 PMThe Great Divide | 129million classified documents at the Signals Intelligence Center inHawaii, and flying to Russia.Additional information does not necessarily change the minds ofpeople who already have a firm view. In the field of social psychology,the testing of “confirmation theory” consistently shows thatpeople tend to more readily reject new information that contradictstheir pre-existing beliefs. For example, when Lee Harvey Oswaldwas arrested in the Texas Theater on November 22, 1963, he saidfamously, “I haven’t shot anybody.” Ten months later, the WarrenCommission presented evidence, including ballistic tests, that itclaimed showed that Oswald had shot three people, including PresidentJohn F. Kennedy, less than an hour before making his statement.Yet many of those who believed Oswald’s public proclamation ofhis innocence chose to believe that the government had falsifiedall the incriminating evidence to tarnish Oswald (who had beenkilled on November 24, 1963) rather than accept that they hadbeen wrong in believing Oswald.The charges, countercharges, and defamatory name- calling in theSnowden case therefore only deepened the great divide. Those whosaw Snowden as a democratic hero exposing the abuses of power ofan out- of- control national security state tended to dismiss anythingthat depicted Snowden in a negative light as a fabrication, whilethose who saw Snowden as a “traitor” tended to dismiss anythingthat depicted him in a more positive light.When it comes to the murky universe of spy agencies, the problemin deciding where the truth lies is further heightened by thepossibility of deliberate deception. Spy masters are, after all, in thebusiness of concealing their most sensitive operations. It is oftenconsidered essential that important secrets be protected by whatWinston Churchill famously termed “a bodyguard of lies.” Topintelligence officials are not exempt from this practice. Consider, forexample, the response to a question concerning the NSA’s operationsmade by James Clapper, the director of national intelligence, tothe Senate Intelligence Committee on March 12, 2013. The Democraticsenator Ron Wyden of Oregon, who was on the committee,asked the spymaster if the NSA collected data on Americans. Clap-Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1299/29/16 5:51 PM130 | how america lost its secretsper answered that the NSA did not knowingly “collect any type ofdata” on millions of Americans. Clapper’s answer was clearly untrue,but it did not mislead Senator Wyden or any other members of theSenate Intelligence Committee; Clapper had truthfully testified in aclassified session of the committee earlier that week that the NSAdid collect Americans’ telephone records. It was the American peoplewho were being misled. Yet none of the senators on the committeecorrected this obviously false answer. When Clapper realized he hadmisspoken, he could not publicly correct the record of the public session,because to do so would be revealing classified information hehad sworn to protect. No doubt other intelligence officers find themselvesin a similar bind in discussing secret matters. This suggeststhat there is a risk in accepting statements made by the intelligencechiefs at face value.But Snowden also has a credibility problem. He has told numerousuntruths, including some calculated to help him insinuate himselfinto the key positions from which he stole secrets and some calculatedto cover up the nature of his theft. For example, Snowden gotaccess in the spring of 2013 to the NSA’s super-secret computers thatstored these electronic files by working at Booz Allen Hamilton. Onhis application to Booz Allen in March 2013, as we’ve seen, Snowdenclaimed to be in the process of completing a master’s degree at theUniversity of Liverpool in computer security sciences. Snowden hadnot completed a single course there and purposely lied to get accessto classified documents and then to get safely away with them.He was also not entirely truthful with the journalists whosetrust he sought when it suited his purpose of protecting himself.For example, as we have seen, in contacting Laura Poitras under thealias Citizen Four in January 2013, he told her that he was currentlya “government employee,” although in fact he was working for aprivate contractor at the time.Snowden had little concern about misleading journalists whenit suited his purpose. For example, he told Alan Rusbridger of TheGuardian, Brian Williams of NBC News, James Bamford of Wired,Katrina vanden Heuvel of The Nation, Barton Gellman, and JaneMayer of The New Yorker that the U.S. government intentionallyEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1309/29/16 5:51 PMThe Great Divide | 131acted to “trap” him in Moscow by revoking his passport while hewas already on a plane to Moscow on the afternoon of June 23.None of these journalists asked Snowden what the basis for his oftrepeatedallegation was. If they had, they would have discovered thathe had no independent basis for his assertion. When asked about itduring the Q&A following his July 12 press conference in Moscow,he indeed said that the only knowledge he had about the suspensionof his passport was what he had “read” in the news reports. Butall the news stories prior to his statement reported that his passporthad been revoked on June 22, while he was still in Hong Kong.ABC News, for example, reported that the U.S. “Consul General–Hong Kong confirmed Hong Kong authorities were notified that Mr.Snowden’s passport was revoked June 22.” By advancing that dateto when his plane was in “midair” on June 23, Snowden provided tounsuspecting journalists an untrue alibi for his presence in Russia.The credibility problem with Snowden assumed a more sinisterdimension once he put himself and his fate in the hands of the Russianauthorities in Moscow. Even though the Obama administrationdecided against revealing the extent of the Russian intelligence service’sparticipation in Snowden’s move from Hong Kong to Moscow,or what intelligence services call an “exfiltration,” I was toldby a presidential national security staff adviser that the governmentacted to protect the intelligence sources used by the CIA, the NSA,and the FBI to track Snowden’s movements in the latter part of Junein Hong Kong. The CIA’s deputy director, Morell, would go no furtherthan to state that during that period he had no doubt that theintelligence services of Russia and China “had an enormous interestin him and the information he [Snowden] had stolen.” Presumably,the last thing these adversary services would want would be to makethis “interest” transparent to the United States.The role of concealment must be taken into account when assessinginformation bearing on the work of espionage services. WhenI was interviewing James Jesus Angleton— the CIA’s legendary excounterintelligencechief, active in the 1970s— for a book on deception,I learned that intelligence services play by a different set ofrules from historians when it comes to their espionage successes.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1319/29/16 5:51 PM132 | how america lost its secretsAngleton, a famously baroque thinker himself, impressed on me thecomplexity of espionage. He said, “It’s not enough just to steal asecret. It must be done in a way that the theft remains undetected.”Deception is employed to obscure the nature and the extent ofthe espionage theft. One of the most famous examples of this principlewas the deception used by British intelligence in World War IIto conceal its success in breaking the German ciphers generated bythe Enigma machines. If German naval intelligence had discoveredBritain was able to read the ciphers it used to communicate with itsU- boats, it would have stopped using them. So British intelligencehid its coup by supplying false information to known German spiesto account for the sinking of U- boats, including the canard that Britishaerial cameras could detect one ingredient in the paint used tocamouflage the U- boats.That same hoary principle of deception applies to modern- daycommunications intelligence. If the Russian, Chinese, or any otheradversary intelligence service got its hands on the documents stolenby Snowden from the NSA’s repositories in Hawaii in 2013, it wouldlikely employ deception, including well- crafted lies, to create asmuch ambiguity as possible as to the missing documents. From thiscounterintelligence perspective, the intelligence issue that spawnedthe great divide cannot be resolved by accepting the uncorroboratedstatements made by a source, such as Snowden, who may be in thehands of the Russian security services in Moscow.By the same token, the calculations made by NSA officials aboutthe extent of the theft are also suspect. After all, the NSA is an intelligenceservice that often engages in secret machinations. We knowthat its top officials reported to the House and Senate IntelligenceCommittees, as well as the president’s national security adviser, thatSnowden compromised over one million documents. But if this wasdisinformation, it is difficult to see its purpose. Inflating the extentof the damage of the Snowden breach to the president, Congress,and the secretary of defense obviously reflected poorly on their ownmanagement of the NSA, and their own careers. Yet such a possibilitycannot be precluded in the arcane world of intelligence.As in any case involving the loss of state secrets, uncontested factsremain in extremely short supply. The opinion- laden appellativesEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1329/29/16 5:51 PMThe Great Divide | 133such as “patriot” and “traitor” that have tended to fill the gap inthe great divide do little to address the important mystery of howmany thousands of state secrets were taken from the United States.How did Snowden breach the supposedly formidable defenses of theNSA? Did he have any assistance? How did he escape to Moscow?And what was the final destination of the stolen documents? HowSnowden succeeded in this coup cannot simply be pieced togetherfrom his own statements and interviews. The story also requires avisit into the wilderness of mirrors of a counterintelligence investigation.For this endeavor, it is necessary to return to the crime scene:the NSA’s base in Hawaii.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1339/29/16 5:51 PMc h a p t e r 14The Crime Scene InvestigationAny private contractor, not even an employee of the government,could walk into the NSA building, take whatever they wanted,and walk out with it and they would never know.— edward snowden, Moscow, 2014Fifteen miles northwest of Honolulu on the island of Oahu,adjacent to the sprawling Wheeler Air Force Base, is a 250,000-square- foot, man- made mound of earth and reinforced concrete surroundedby an electrified fence. Inside the mound is a three- storystructure originally built by the air force in World War II as a bombproofaircraft repair facility. In the Cold War, it was modernized towithstand enemy chemical, biological, radiological, or electromagneticpulse attacks and was used by the navy’s operation center forits Pacific fleet. After the Cold War, the huge edifice was turned overto the NSA, which, as stated earlier, had been created as an intelligenceservice to intercept the communications and signals of foreigncountries after World War II, a mission that included vacuuminginto its giant computer arrays telephone messages, missile telemetry,submarine signals, and virtually everything on the electromagneticspectrum of interest to the U.S. Defense Department andU.S. intelligence agencies. As the NSA developed it, this Hawaiianbase became one of its primary regional bases for gathering AsianEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1349/29/16 5:51 PMThe Crime Scene Investigation | 135communications intelligence. It provided a valuable window on theactivities of adversary nations in the Pacific region and was able tomonitor the ballistic missile tests and submarine activities of China,North Korea, and Russia. By 2013, the Kunia base had a vast arrayof state- of- the- art technology, including ninety Cray supercomputersarranged in a horseshoe configuration, used to decipher andmake sense of the intercepted signals from China, Russia, and NorthKorea. At the heart of the Hawaiian complex was a unit with bothmilitary and civilian employees. A large share of the civilians whoran the computers worked under two- year contracts with the NSA’sleading civilian contractor, Booz Allen Hamilton.General Alexander, who, as I said, headed the NSA in 2013, firstlearned about an impending story in The Guardian on June 4, whilehe was in Germany meeting with its top intelligence officials, fromJanine Gibson, The Guardian’s American website editor. She hadnotified the NSA it intended to break a story focusing on the organization.It took NSA counterintelligence less than forty- eight hoursto determine that a civilian employee at the base from which documentswere stolen had not reported back to work on May 22. Hiscivilian supervisor had delayed reporting the absence to the NSAuntil May 28. It also determined that the missing civilian employee,Snowden, had lied on his application for a medical leave and hadflown to Hong Kong. Personal records showed he was being trainedas an analyst at the Threat Operations Center and had worked therefor less than six weeks. He had taken the medical leave on May 18and left the country by plane. By June 6, he had become the NSA’smain suspect.Alexander flew to Washington, D.C., after assigning the sensitivejob of investigating the breach to a team headed by Richard“Rick” Ledgett, who was then director of the NSA’s Threat OperationsCenter at the NSA’s headquarters in Fort Meade, Maryland.Ledgett was the logical choice to head the damage assessment investigationbecause the center’s regional branch in Hawaii was underhis command. Ledgett flew to Hawaii, where his first task was toreconstruct the chronology of Snowden’s moves, or, as the tactic iscalled in counterintelligence parlance, “walking the cat back.”The NSA had also notified the FBI of Snowden’s possible involve-Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1359/29/16 5:51 PM136 | how america lost its secretsment in the theft of state secrets in the first week of June. The FBIis in charge of criminal investigations of civilian U.S. intelligenceworkers, even if the alleged crime occurs on an NSA base. The FBIimmediately dispatched a task force of agents to investigate a potentialespionage case in Hawaii. When questioned, Lindsay Mills saidSnowden was away on a business trip. After determining fromairline and hotel data that he was in Hong Kong, the FBI realizedSnowden was a possible intelligence defector. It froze his credit andbank cards. It also notified the passport office in the State Departmentand the legal attachés at the Hong Kong consulate. The legalattachés, who were actually FBI field agents posted in Hong Kong,located Snowden at the Mira hotel on June 8. On the evening ofJune 9, Snowden revealed in his twelve- minute video posted on theGuardian website that he was the source of the stolen NSA documents.Because Hong Kong is part of China, U.S. law enforcementdid not have the means to recover them.At that point, determining the magnitude of the theft of documentsbecame a critical concern of the investigation. Aside from thefew dozen documents published by The Guardian and The WashingtonPost, what else had Snowden stolen?Within the next few days, a small army of forensic investigatorsfrom the FBI, the Defense Department, and the “Q” counterintelligencedivision of the NSA swarmed onto the NSA base in Hawaii.The proximate crime scene for their investigation was the NationalThreat Operations Center. They examined the cubicle whereSnowden had last worked and then began retracing all his activitiesat the NSA from 2009 to 2013. To begin with, they needed tofind out how many documents from the center had been copied andtaken by Snowden.Meanwhile, the Defense Intelligence Agency (the Pentagon’s ownintelligence service) was kept partially in the dark. Although theNSA is officially part of the Department of Defense, it operated witha high degree of autonomy with its own inspector general, investigativestaff, and reporting channels. The DIA did not learn fromthe NSA that Snowden had stolen military documents concerningthe joint Cyber Command until July 10. The number of stolen militarydocuments from the Department of Defense was staggering.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1369/29/16 5:51 PMThe Crime Scene Investigation | 137The DIA found from its forensic examination that Snowden hadcopied “over 900,000” military files. Many of these non- NSA filescame from the Cyber Command, which had been set up in 2011by the NSA and the army, navy, marine, and air force cryptologicalservices to combat the threat of warfare in cyberspace. The losswas considered of such importance that between 200 and 250 militaryintelligence officers worked day and night for the next fourmonths, according to the DIA’s classified report, to “triage, analyze,and assess Department of Defense impacts related to the Snowdencompromise.” The job of this unit, called the Joint Staff MitigationOversight Task Force, was to attempt to contain the damage causedby the Snowden breach. In many cases, containment meant shuttingdown NSA operations in China, Russia, North Korea, and Iran sothey could not be used to confuse and distract the U.S. military.The NSA and the Defense Department were not the only governmentagencies concerned with determining the extent of thebreach. The NSA acted as a service organization for the CIA throughhandling most if not all of its requests for communications intelligenceto support both its international espionage and its analyticoperations. Although the CIA and the NSA were both part of the socalledintelligence community, the NSA did not immediately sharewith the CIA details of the Snowden breach. Despite the immensepotential damage of the theft, it was not until June 10 that the CIA’sdirector, John Owen Brennan, and his deputy, Michael Morell, werebriefed by the NSA. When Morell realized how much data Snowdenhad taken, he was astounded.“You might have thought of all the government entities on theplanet, the one least vulnerable to such grand theft would have beenthe NSA,” he wrote. “But it turned out that the NSA had left itselfvulnerable.” According to Morell, he bluntly told the NSA brieferthat it was urgent for the CIA to be brought in on the case. After all,the CIA had employed Snowden only four years earlier. Specifically,Morell said, the CIA needed to find out three things: Had CIA documentsbeen part of Snowden’s haul? How long had Snowden beenstealing documents? Had Snowden been working “with any foreignintelligence service, either wittingly or not”?According to Morell, the effort to get a direct answer from NSAEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1379/29/16 5:51 PM138 | how america lost its secretsofficials to these three key questions “proved maddeningly difficult.”He found that in mid- June NSA officials with whom he dealtwere so “distraught at the massive security breach” that initiallythey refused to allow even CIA officers to participate in the ongoingsecurity review. A former NSA executive told me there was “nearpanic” at the NSA. Finally, Morell called Chris Inglis, a former professorof computer science who had risen to be the NSA’s deputydirector at the time of the breach. Inglis, who headed operations forthe NSA, told him “the news was not good.” Among the data copiedby Snowden were a large number of CIA secrets. By the time theCIA learned that its secrets had been compromised, Snowden washeaded to Russia.The investigation of a crime involving potential espionage is noeasy task. In this case, it required attempting to solve a jigsaw puzzlein which not only were key pieces missing but also, because itinvolved adversary intelligence services, some of the found piecesmight deliberately have been twisted to mislead the U.S. investigators.By late July, NSA investigators had made their initial assessment.They determined that most of the material had been taken fromsealed- off areas known in intelligence speak as “compartments,”which in this case were files stored on computers that were isolatedfrom any network. Each compartment electronically tracks all theactivities that occur in it on its logs, including the password identityof any person who has gained entry to any compartment. From aforensic examination of these logs, NSA investigators were quicklyable to reconstruct the timeline of the theft. The logs showed that anunauthorized party without proper passwords had begun copyingfiles in mid- April, which was just days after Snowden began his jobat the center. The illicit activity ended just before Snowden’s last dayof work there. So this piece fit in with Snowden’s guilt.The size of the theft was another matter. Ledgett was certainly ina position to know (in the shake- up that followed, he would replaceInglis as deputy director of the NSA). According to Ledgett, the perpetratorhad “touched” 1.7 million documents, moving from compartmentto compartment. Of these “touched” documents, accordingto the analysis of the logs, more than one million of them had beenmoved by the unauthorized party in mid- May to an auxiliary com-Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1389/29/16 5:51 PMThe Crime Scene Investigation | 139puter intended to be used for temporary storage by authorized servicepersonnel. Finally, the data was transferred off this auxiliarycomputer presumably to thumb drives or other external storagedevices. This download occurred just days before Snowden left theNSA on May 17, 2013, having told the agency that he needed a medicalleave of absence.The quantity of stolen documents, 1.7 million, does not necessarilyreveal the damage and can itself be misleading. Many documentsdo not reveal current or known sources or methods, and others mayhave little value to an enemy. And a large portion of the documentsmight have been duplications. The quality of some of these documentsis another matter. Just one document that exposed a sourceor method of which enemies are unaware can be of immense value.One such document taken by Snowden provided what Ledgett called“a roadmap” to the NSA’s current secret operations, revealing to anadversary such as Russia, China, or Iran “what we know, what wedon’t know, and, implicitly, a way to protect themselves.” There weremany documents in the Snowden breach that met these criteria,according to a national security official at the Obama White House.General Alexander closely followed the investigation as it developedover the summer of 2013. By then, of course, the whole worldknew that Snowden had stolen a vast trove of NSA documents.Alexander saw major inconsistencies developing between Snowden’spersonal account of the theft and what had actually happened. Thetimeline established by the government’s investigators did notmatch Snowden’s story line. “Something is not right,” Alexandersaid in an interview.For one thing, Snowden had made the claim to journalists, fourmonths after he was in Russia, that he had turned over all thedocuments he took from the NSA’s compartments to Poitras andGreen wald in Hong Kong. On August 18, the investigators had theopportunity to examine the files that Snowden had given to Poitrasand Greenwald. This discovery came when British authorities, underSchedule 7 of Britain’s Terrorism Act, detained David Miranda,Green wald’s romantic partner, at Heathrow Airport. Miranda wassuspected of acting as a courier for Greenwald and Poitras. Accordingto Greenwald’s account, Snowden had given both him and Poi-Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1399/29/16 5:51 PM140 | how america lost its secretstras identical copies of the NSA documents in Hong Kong. WhenGreen wald returned home to Rio de Janeiro, he found his copy wascorrupted. But Poitras still had her digital copy of whatever stolendocuments Snowden had distributed to them. So Greenwald dispatchedMiranda from Rio to Berlin to get a copy of Poitras’s thumbdrive. On the return trip, Miranda’s plane stopped at Heathrow,where British authorities detained him and temporarily took thethumb drive from him. Poitras had written out the password forGreenwald, and Miranda kept it with the thumb drive. The Britishcopied the contents and shared them with the NSA. As a result,the NSA discovered that Snowden had only given Poitras fifty- eightthousand documents. The damage assessment team under Ledgettdetermined that some of these documents had been edited out ofmuch larger documents that the NSA logs showed Snowden hadcopied. By the count of both the NSA and the Defense Departmentteams, almost one million documents were unaccounted for. Whathappened to the missing documents?The NSA investigation found that the chronology of the theftof documents did not support Snowden’s claim to journalists thathe had only been seeking whistle- blowing documents. Most of thedocuments he took first did not concern the domestic activities of theNSA. Only toward the end of the theft did he copy documents thatwould qualify as whistle- blowing. The court order to Verizon thatwas the basis of the initial Guardian exposé was only issued by theFISA court on April 27, 2013. The other main whistle- blowing documenthe revealed, the PowerPoint presentation about PRISM, wasonly issued in April 2013. Yet Snowden had been downloading documentsfor at least nine months before he copied these documents.When I discussed the chronology of the copied documents witha former government official briefed on the investigation, he suggestedthat Snowden’s purpose might have changed between 2012and 2013. When I asked him what might have induced the change,he replied, “That is one of the unanswered questions.” That Snowdenonly took these two whistle- blowing documents at the tail end ofhis nine- month operation, and after he had contacted Poitras andGreen wald, suggests he might have had another motive prior tocontacting journalists. In light of this chronology, the investigationEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1409/30/16 11:09 AMThe Crime Scene Investigation | 141had to consider the possibility that his whistle- blowing was, partly ifnot wholly, a cover for another enterprise.Snowden told journalists he had access to “millions of recordsthat [he] could walk out the door with at any time with no accountability,no oversight, no auditing, the government didn’t even knowthey were gone.” However, he was not among the limited numberof individuals at the center who had access to these documents.Both the NSA’s and Booz Allen’s employment records showed thatSnowden had not yet completed his requisite on- the- job trainingwhen he carried out the theft. Consequently, he had not yet beenprovided with the passwords he needed to get the documents. Evenif he had remained at the NSA long enough to finish his training,he would only have been provided with the password to the particularcompartment relevant to his work, not to all compartments. Thetight control over these passwords was, according to a former topNSA official, a critical part of the NSA’s security framework. He toldme that Snowden, at least during the period of the thefts in Apriland May 2013, had no more legitimate access to the compartmentsthan the cleaning personnel. Somehow, though, Snowden convertedhis proximity to access.If a hundred top- quality diamonds were stolen from locked vaultsat Tiffany by a recently hired trainee who, it turned out, did not havethe combination to open these vaults, the police would be expected toconsider that the trainee might have had help from a current or formerinsider at the company who knew the combinations. Snowden,who had accomplished a similarly inexplicable feat, said in his videoconfession that he was solely responsible. However, it is perfectlylogical to assume, given the circumstances, that he might have hadhelp, unwitting or witting.The FBI could assume either that the NSA’s security regime wasso badly flawed that Snowden could trick his fellow workers intoproviding him with access or that there was another individual atthe center who might have assisted or directed Snowden. When theinvestigation came to this fork in the road in the summer of 2013,according to a source on the House Intelligence Committee, it chosethe former route.Finally, there was the question of whether Snowden had gone toEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1419/30/16 11:09 AM142 | how america lost its secretsRussia by design or by accident. Whenever an intelligence workersteals sensitive compartmented information of interest to a foreignadversary and then defects to that adversary, it raises at least thespecter of state- sponsored espionage. It is a commonly accepted presumptionin counterintelligence that a spy, fearing arrest, flees toa country that has some reason to offer him protection. When theBritish spies Guy Burgess, Donald Maclean, and Kim Philby fled toMoscow during the Cold War, the presumption was that they had aprior intelligence connection with Russia. Philby confirmed that inhis 1968 memoir, My Silent War. So in the case of Snowden, counterintelligencehad to consider the possibility that his theft of statesecrets and his arrival in Moscow might not be totally coincidental.Snowden blamed high officials in the U.S. government who purposely“trapped him” in Russia. He told the editor of The Nation,“I’m in exile. My government revoked my passport intentionally toleave me exiled” and “chose to keep me in Russia.” He repeated thatassertion over a dozen times, but as we’ve seen, it had no basis infact. Whenever criminal charges are lodged against a U.S. citizen bythe Department of Justice, the State Department, in accordance withthe U.S. code of justice, marks in the electronic passport validationadvisory system that that person’s passport is valid only for returnto the United States. After criminal charges were publicly filedagainst Snowden on June 21, it advised foreign governments thatbecause Snowden was wanted on felony charges, he “should not beallowed to proceed in any further international travel, other than isnecessary to return him to the United States.” Rather than “exiling”Snowden, the government acted to facilitate his return home. Withhis passport, he could have flown home from either Hong Kong orMoscow, where he, like any other person accused of a felony, wouldface the charges against him. Snowden’s unfounded claims suggestedto investigators that he had something to hide about his arrival inRussia.The counterintelligence investigation had access to State Departmentrecords showing that its representatives in Hong Kong hadinformed authorities there on June 16 that there were criminalcharges against Snowden. Only a typographical error in spelling outSnowden’s middle name— James instead of Joseph— in the criminalEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1429/29/16 5:51 PMThe Crime Scene Investigation | 143charges prevented the Hong Kong police from immediately orderinghis detention. His Hong Kong lawyers were certainly advised ofthese pending charges no later than June 21, when they were publishedon the front page of the South China Morning Post in HongKong. Presumably, Snowden knew that actions by the U.S. governmentwere already in progress and that one of these actions wouldinclude restricting his passport. One of his lawyers, Jonathan Man,even accompanied Snowden to the airport out of his concern that hewould not be allowed by Hong Kong authorities to go through passportcontrol. Ordinarily, Hong Kong passport control scans passportswhen tourists exit but does not check them against a computerizeddatabase.In any case, when Snowden arrived in Russia on June 23, anyfuture international travel decisions for him would be up to the governmentof Russia, not that of the United States. It could have senthim back to Hong Kong, as is normally done when someone arriveswithout a proper visa, or to the United States. The only governmentwith the actual means to “trap” him in Russia was the Russiangovernment.Senior intelligence officials also knew that the U.S. government,rather than conspiring to keep Snowden in Moscow, had met nearlyevery day while he was in Hong Kong with Lisa Monaco, PresidentObama’s homeland security adviser, in the White House SituationRoom to find a way to prevent Snowden and his cache of secretsfrom falling into Russian hands. Robert S. Mueller III, then the FBIdirector, reportedly even directly appealed to the FSB head, AlexanderBortnikov, to return Snowden to the United States.U.S. intelligence also knew that it was no accident that Snowdenwound up in the hands of Russia. He had been in contact with Russianofficials in Hong Kong. It will be recalled that Putin admitted tothis liaison on September 3, in a press briefing on state- owned ChannelOne television; he also divulged that he had advance knowledgeof Snowden’s plan.“I will tell you something I have never said before,” Putin said.Snowden “first went to Hong Kong and got in touch with our diplomaticrepresentatives.” Putin was told then that an American “agentof special services” was seeking to come to Russia. Putin added thatEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1439/29/16 5:51 PM144 | how america lost its secretshe declared that this agent would be “welcome, provided, however,that he stops any kind of activity that could damage Russian- USrelations.”Even before that public confirmation of the Russian role in HongKong, the White House was well aware of it. On June 23, the Democraticsenator Charles Schumer of New York correctly said, basedon a White House briefing, that “Vladimir Putin had personallyapproved Snowden’s flight” to Moscow. The NSA had the means tomonitor Russian communication between Moscow and Hong Kong.The NSA also reportedly intercepted contacts between these Russianofficials and Russian representatives of Aeroflot, the Russian stateownedairline that had flights between Hong Kong and Moscow.Aeroflot (like most other international carriers) ordinarily requiresinternational passengers to have both a valid passport and, if necessary,a visa to the country of their destination. Those rules had tobe waived for Snowden’s exfiltration from Hong Kong. Snowden’sdefection to Moscow was not a haphazard result of unexpected circumstances.Russia obviously knew he was coming. This raised newquestions for the investigation. What led Snowden to defect to Russia?Was his arrival in Moscow planned by Russian intelligence inadvance of his going public in Hong Kong? Was any other party,such as China, privy to the plan? Was there a quid pro quo?Putin’s authorization could certainly account for Aeroflot’s waivingits usual passport and visa check to allow Snowden to board itsplane, as well as the dispatch with which Russian officials whiskedSnowden off the plane after it landed at the Moscow airport. It couldalso account for Snowden’s vanishing from public view for the nextthree weeks and the promulgation of the cover story that Snowdenwas unwillingly trapped at the airport by the U.S. government. Thereasons behind Putin’s move were less clear.By September 2013, the investigation was looking into a veritableabyss. Snowden’s culpability was no longer an issue. What waslacking from Snowden’s video, or the two- hour film made by LauraPoitras, was any specific information on how many documents hehad copied, how he had obtained the passwords to the computerson which they were stored, the period of time involved in the theft,or how he had breached all the security measures of the NSA inEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1449/29/16 5:51 PMThe Crime Scene Investigation | 145Hawaii. Nor would that data be forthcoming from Snowden, whomay be the only witness to the crime. By June 23, he was in a safehaven in Moscow. Even though the grand jury case against Snowdenwas cut and dry, it was also irrelevant because the United States doesnot have an extradition treaty with Russia.The purpose of the intelligence investigation went far beyonddetermining Snowden’s guilt or innocence, however. Its job was tofind out how such a massive theft of documents could occur, how theperpetrator escaped, and, perhaps most urgent, who had obtained theunaccounted- for stolen documents from Snowden.In his interviews with journalists in Moscow, Snowden studiouslyavoided describing the means by which he breached the securityaperture of America’s most secret intelligence service. He only toldthe journalists who came to Moscow to interview him, with a bit ofpseudo- modesty, that he was not “an angel” who descended fromheaven to carry out the theft. But the question of how Snowdenstole these documents may be the most important part of the story.The NSA, after all, furnishes communications intelligence to thepresident, his national security advisers, and the Department ofDefense, intelligence that is supposedly derived from secret sourcesin adversary nations. If these adversary nations learn about theNSA’s sources, then the information, if not worthless, cannot befully trusted. The most basic responsibility of the NSA is to protectits sources. Yet Snowden walked away with long lists of them.In doing so, he amply demonstrated that a single civilian employeeworking for an outside contractor, even one not having the necessarypasswords and other access privileges, could steal documentsthat betrayed these vital sources. He also demonstrated that such amassive theft could go undetected for at least two weeks.If Snowden managed this feat on his own, as he claims in hisHong Kong video, it suggests that any other civilian employee witha perceived grievance against NSA practices or American foreignpolicy could also walk away with some of the most precious secretsheld by U.S. intelligence. Such vulnerability extends to tens of thousandsof civilian contract employees in positions similar to the oneheld by Snowden. The lone disgruntled employee explanation istherefore hardly reassuring. If true, it calls into question the entireEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1459/29/16 5:51 PM146 | how america lost its secretsmultibillion- dollar enterprise of outsourcing the management of theNSA’s computer networks and other technical work to outside contractors.It also casts doubts on the post- 9/11 decision by the intelligencecommunity to strip away much of the NSA’s “stovepiping”that previously insulated its most sensitive computers. Withoutsuch stovepiping, any rogue civilian employee could bring down theentire edifice of shared intelligence.A finding that Snowden had acted in concert with others in breachingcompartments at the NSA would hardly be any more reassuring.Such collaboration among intelligence workers would reflect gravelyon the mind- set of the NSA. Snowden described an atmosphere inwhich intelligence workers exchanged lewd photographs of foreignsuspects. Some NSA employees met to protest the NSA policies. Didthis violation of the NSA’s rules also involve abetting the theft ofdocuments? If so, the NSA would have to evaluate further vulnerabilitiesthat might arise when it entrusts its secrets to technicianswho do not share its values. A collaborative breach would signal animmense failure of the present concept of the counterintelligenceregime in the NSA.From what I gathered from government officials who were familiarwith the investigation, there was a concern that answering the“how” question would rouse serious doubts about the very abilityof the NSA to carry out its core mission of protecting the government’sintelligence secrets. However it was organized, it was clearthat Snowden had played a major role in what amounted to a brilliantintelligence coup.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1469/29/16 5:51 PMc h a p t e r 15Did Snowden Act Alone?When you look at the totality of Snowden’s actions certainly onehypothesis that jumps out at you, that seems to explain his abilityto do all these things, is that he had help and had help fromsomebody who was very competent in these matters.— general michael hayden, former director, NSA and CIAAwhistle- blower enters the enterprise of stealing statesecrets for reasons of conscience, but so do many spies. Suchconscience- driven spies are called, in CIA parlance, “ideologicalagents.” For instance, the British diplomat Donald Maclean, oneof the most important Russian spies in the Cold War, was an ideologicalrecruit. He stole immensely valuable U.S. nuclear secretsfor the Russian intelligence service without receiving any monetarycompensation.The acceptance of money is not necessarily a meaningful distinctionwhen it comes to espionage. To be sure, many spies getpaid, but some whistle- blowers also receive a rich bounty for theirwork. Indeed, under federal laws, whistle- blowers can qualify formultimillion- dollar bounties for exposing financial malfeasance. Thewhistle- blower Bradley Birkenfeld, for example, after he himselfwas paroled from prison in 2012, received an award of $104 millionfor providing data that exposed illicit tax sheltering at the Swiss UBSbank. Assange also offered political whistle- blowers six- figure cashEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1479/29/16 5:51 PM148 | how america lost its secretsbounties from money raised on the Internet. In 2015, for instance,WikiLeaks offered $100,000 bounties to any whistle- blowers whoprovided the site with secret documents exposing details of theTrans- Pacific Trade Agreement.Nor is acting alone necessarily a line that divides whistle- blowersfrom spies. In many cases, whistle- blowers have accomplices whohelp them carry out their mission. For example, in 1969, the celebratedwhistle- blower Daniel Ellsberg, a military analyst at theRand Corporation, had an accomplice, Anthony Russo, who had alsoworked at Rand. (Both were indicted by the government.) Acting inconcert, they copied secret documents that became known famouslyas the Pentagon Papers.Whistle- blowers can also, like conventional spies, enter into elaborateconspiracies to carry out an operation. On the night of March 8,1971, eight whistle- blowers working together with burglary toolsbroke into the FBI office in Media, Pennsylvania, and stole almost allthe FBI files there. The conspirators escaped and kept their identitiessecret for over forty- two years.Self- definitions also do not necessarily produce a distinctionbetween whistle- blowers and conventional spies. Consider PhilipAgee, who left the CIA in 1969 for what he described as “reasonsof conscience.” Specifically, he said he objected to the CIA’s covertsupport of Latin American dictators. After contacting the Sovietembassy in Mexico City, he defected to Cuba, where he leaked informationthat exposed CIA operations. Although Agee insisted he wasa whistle- blower, and he adamantly denied offering any secrets to theSoviet Union, the KGB viewed him as a conventional spy. Accordingto Oleg Kalugin, the top Soviet counterintelligence officer in theKGB in Moscow, who defected to the United States, Agee offeredCIA secrets first to the KGB residency in Mexico City in 1973 andthen to the Cuban intelligence service. Agee provided the KGB witha “treasure trove” of U.S. secrets, Kalugin revealed. “I then sat inmy office in Moscow reading the growing list of revelations comingfrom Agee.” Despite this disparity, Agee still defined himself to thepublic as a whistle- blower because he also had exposed CIA operationsto the public.The Snowden case blurs the demarcation line even further. UnlikeEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1489/29/16 5:51 PMDid Snowden Act Alone? | 149other whistle- blowers who uncovered what they considered governmentmalfeasance by virtue of their jobs, Snowden, by his ownadmission, took a new job in 2013 specifically to get access to the SCIfiles concerning NSA sources that he stole from the Threat OperationsCenter. Switching jobs in order to widen one’s access to statesecrets is an activity usually associated with penetration agents, notwhistle- blowers. While the technical distinction between a whistleblowerand a spy may still serve the media in the case of Snowden,it does not help in solving the counterintelligence conundrum. Acomplex theft of state secrets had been successfully carried out ina supposedly secure site. The only known witness, Snowden, hadescaped to Russia, where he could be of no help in reconstructing thecrime for American intelligence agencies. The stolen data was keptin the equivalent of sealed “vaults”— actually computer drives thatwere not connected to the NSA network. If ever there was a lockedroommystery, this was it.According to the FBI investigation, Snowden pierced these barriersby using passwords that belonged to other people and using credentialsthat allowed him to masquerade as a system administrator.It was a feat that must have required meticulous planning.To address such a mystery, a counterintelligence investigationstarts with a tabula rasa, stripping away all the previous assumptions,including that Snowden was the lone perpetrator. It buildsalternative scenarios to test against the known facts. To be sure, scenariobuilding differs from that of a conventional forensic investigationaimed at finding pieces of evidence that can be used to persuadea jury in a courtroom. Unlike a judicial investigation concerned withguilt and innocence, scenario building looks to develop a story thatis, concurrently, intrinsically consistent and humanly plausible, andin the process it also identifies and explores the possible holes in thecase.“Scenarios deal with two worlds: the world of facts and the worldof perceptions. They explore for facts but they aim at perceptionsinside the heads of decision makers. Their purpose is to gather andtransform information of strategic significance into fresh perceptions,”wrote Pierre Wack in the Harvard Business Review in 1985.Such scenarios must aim at constituting a limited set of mutuallyEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1499/29/16 5:51 PM150 | how america lost its secretsexclusive alternatives. The point is to assure that any alternative thatfits the relevant facts, no matter how implausible it may initiallyseem to be, is not neglected.One of the most vexing problems that had to be explained by thesescenarios is how Snowden got the passwords to up to twenty- four ofthese vaults. He could not have obtained these passwords during hisprevious employment at Dell, because Dell technicians did not haveaccess to the Level 3 documents stored in these compartments. Nor,as noted earlier, was he given access to them when he transferred toBooz Allen, because he had not completed the requisite training.Snowden had also, it will be recalled, relinquished his privileges asa system administrator when he transferred to Booz Allen, so he didnot have the privilege to override password protection. In short, hisnew position as an infrastructure analyst did not give him the abilityto enter compartments that he had not yet been read into.As I’ve said, there are two possible ways he could have gottenthese passwords: either he had assistance from a party who hadaccess to them, or he found flaws in the NSA’s security proceduresthat left the supposedly closed vaults effectively unlocked.The Unwitting Accomplice PossibilityIt is possible that if Snowden received assistance, it was entirelyunwitting. He might have obtained some passwords through deception,such as tricking co- workers into typing their passwords intoa device that captured them. As the NSA informed Congress in2014, three of his fellow workers told the FBI that Snowden mighthave deceived them to gain access to their passwords. He could havesimply asked other analysts at the center who had been read intocompartments for their passwords. Such an approach would beextremely risky for the analyst, who could lose his job and securityclearance by cooperating. It could also be risky for Snowden becauseany analyst he approached was supposed to report any request fora password to a security officer. Making such requests even moresuspicious, Snowden had been working at the Threat OperationsCenter for just a few weeks as a trainee and was not well known toEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1509/29/16 5:51 PMDid Snowden Act Alone? | 151other analysts there. “It is inconceivable to me that his co- workerswould divulge their passwords to him,” a former Booz Allen executive,who had also worked at the Defense Intelligence Agency, toldme. “If he was a system administrator, he might trick a threat analystinto entering his password into his computer under the pretextthat he needed it to deal with an urgent hardware issue.” But,it will be recalled, Snowden was not a system administrator at thecenter. Snowden therefore “had no plausible reason for requestingpasswords to compartments he had not been read into,” the formerexecutive said. He said that NSA executives might have been readinto all twenty- four of the compartments, but he deemed it inconceivablethey would illicitly share their passwords with Snowden. Iasked him what the chance was of his voluntarily obtaining sometwenty- four passwords from co- workers in five weeks. “In my opinion,near zero,” he said.It is possible of course that Snowden could have simply observedothers typing in their passwords, one by one, but that would taketime and possibly attract attention. I asked the former Booz Allencontractor whether it was possible that Snowden could have used adevice for intercepting another computer’s electronic signals, calledby hackers a “key logger.” Such a device, which is obtainable overthe Internet, could be used to steal the passwords of the analystswho had been read into the compartments. My source said thatwhile it was possible that Snowden smuggled in a key logger in hisbackpack, it could not be operated unless it was hardwired to a computerinside the center, because, like those at all other NSA facilities,the computers had been insulated to block any form of wirelesstransmission. This precaution was taken to guard against an EMP, orelectromagnetic pulse, attack by an enemy. The only way Snowdencould intercept keystrokes was to attach a cable from his key loggerto each of his fellow workers’ computers. In this scenario, he wouldhave had to surreptitiously build his own wired network connectinghis hidden key logger to twenty- four separate computers. Moreover,he would have to do this wiring in an open- plan office wherehe could not count on these additional wires, even if rigged one byone, not being noticed by either other analysts in the room or the“geek squad” of system administrators who regularly checked con-Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1519/29/16 5:51 PM152 | how america lost its secretsnections. Making the task even more risky, according to my BoozAllen source, there were closed- circuit cameras. The only way hecould mitigate the risk of detection was by having someone helphim build this network.Even if Snowden had managed to obtain all the necessary passwordsfrom colleagues, he would have had to transfer the files to anexternal storage device. This was not a matter of simply attachinga thumb drive or other external device to a port, because, unlike inmovies such as Mission: Impossible, the ports on the computers atthe NSA were ordinarily sealed shut. This measure was taken specificallyto prevent any unauthorized downloading by NSA workers.The only people at the center who had the authorization, and themeans, to open these ports and transfer data were system administrators,according to the former Booz Allen executive. Systemadministrators needed to have this privilege to deal with glitchesin the computers. Snowden was no longer a system administratorand had no such privileges. So again, he would have needed help.He would have needed to either borrow a system administrator’scredential or forge his own.The credential he would need is called a public key infrastructure,or PKI, card with its authentication code embedded in a magneticstrip. When I asked the former Booz Allen executive if Snowdenpossessed the skill set to forge such a card, he said that he stronglydoubted any NSA employee would be capable of such a forgerywithout special equipment. Just asking such a favor could “set offalarms,” my source said.The unwitting accomplice scenario had another stumbling block:time. We know from Poitras that Snowden told her in early April2013 that he planned to deliver documents to her in six to eightweeks (which he in fact did). But he had not yet started working forBooz Allen at the center until that same month. It does not seemplausible that in making such a commitment he was merely countingon his ingenuity in the face of strangers to fulfill it. The only wayhe could have known for certain that he would be able to borrow aPKI card and obtain the passwords, whether by trickery, by observation,or by a key router, before he had begun working at the centerwas that he already knew someone there who would help him.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1529/29/16 5:51 PMThe Witting Accomplice PossibilityDid Snowden Act Alone? | 153The witting accomplice scenario better fits with the principle in logiccalled Occam’s razor, which suggests that when one is choosingbetween alternative explanations, the one that requires the fewestassumptions should be given priority. It would be relatively easyto gain access to passwords if Snowden had the cooperation of aninsider at the center who had been read into the compartments or,even better, if he had the cooperation of a system administrator withthe necessary PKI cards and shell keys to bypass the password protection.Such an accomplice could also help explain how Snowdenwas able to get the job at the center in the first place, how he knewin advance that he could find there the “lists” of the NSA sources inforeign countries, and how he knew that there were security traps atthe center. Such a witting accomplice might even have prepared inadvance the “spiders” that Snowden used to index the files.The witting accomplice scenario of course requires an unsettlingexpansion of the plot. It means Snowden collaborated with one ormore insiders at the center to steal secret documents. It is not difficultto imagine, in light of the lax background checks for outsidecontractors servicing the NSA, that there were others in the “geeksquad” who shared Snowden’s antipathy to NSA surveillance. Certainly,we know that Snowden found other NSA workers who werewilling to attend his anti- surveillance CryptoParty in December2012. Some might be willing to offer Snowden help if he was willingto go public. Indeed, if the geek culture produced one Snowden, whywouldn’t it produce others? If such an accomplice lacked Snowden’swillingness to flee to another country, he might have limited his participationto supplying technical assistance. For his part, Snowdenmight have agreed to divert suspicion from his accomplice by takingsole responsibility for the crime when he went public.All of this is theoretically possible, but no witting accomplice wasever identified. The FBI, which was in charge of the domestic part ofthe investigation of the Snowden case, questioned all of Snowden’sco- workers at the center over the course of six months and failedto find anyone who knowingly helped Snowden. If the accomplicewas an idealistic amateur, it is likely the FBI would have found him.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1539/29/16 5:51 PM154 | how america lost its secretsThree co- workers did admit to the FBI, as noted earlier, that theymight have inadvertently given Snowden their passwords, but thesethree slips would not account for Snowden’s breach of all the othercompartments. Of course, there might have also been less forthcomingco- workers who hid their slips in divulging their passwords toSnowden.This raises the more sinister possibility that the accomplicewas not an amateur co- worker but a spy who was already in placewhen Snowden arrived. Such a penetration agent could have beenrecruited by an adversary intelligence service before Snowden cameon the scene. After Snowden expressed a desire to expose the NSA’sdomestic surveillance, it could then have used him as an “umbrella”to hide its own activities. Finding such a means to protect a sourcewhile exploiting his or her information is not uncommon in espionageoperations, and because Snowden was willing to flee Americaand go public, he could serve as a near- perfect umbrella. “Snowdenmay have carried out of the NSA many more documents than heknew about,” Tyler Drumheller, the former CIA station chief, said. Itcould also account for the disparity between the claims of Snowdenand the NSA damage assessment as to the number of documentsthat were compromised.As far- fetched as this scenario may seem, less than three yearsbefore the Snowden breach the NSA had received a warning froma CIA mole (to be discussed in greater detail later) that the Russianintelligence service might have recruited a KGB mole at the FortMeade headquarters of the NSA. No mole was found in 2010, andif one existed, it could not have been Snowden, who was workingfor the NSA in Japan in 2010. Such a putative mole could conceivablyhave acquired enough information to later facilitate Snowden’soperation.As Snowden acknowledges, he was not a happy worker at theNSA. He complained in his posts over the Internet between 2010and 2013 about superiors and what he considered NSA abuses toco- workers. If someone assumed the guise of a reluctant whistleblower,he would have little difficulty in approaching Snowden.Snowden might not even know his true affiliation beyond that heEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1549/29/16 5:51 PMDid Snowden Act Alone? | 155shared Snowden’s anti- surveillance views. If Snowden then voicedan interest in exposing the NSA’s secrets, this person could supplyhim with the necessary guidance, steering a still- unsuspectingSnowden first to the Booz Allen position and afterward to his associatesin Hong Kong. By taking sole credit for the coup in the videothat he made with Poitras and Greenwald in Hong Kong, he acted, ashe told Greenwald, to divert suspicion from anyone else. This movecould also give any collaborator he might have had in Hawaii timeto cover his or her tracks.The astronomer Carl Sagan famously said in regard to searchingthe universe for signals from other civilizations that the “absenceof evidence is not evidence of absence.” That injunction also appliesto the spooky universe of espionage. The fact that a mole hunt failsto find a hidden collaborator at the NSA does not necessarily meansuch a mole does not exist. Historically, we have many notable casesin which Russian moles eluded long, intensive investigations. RobertHanssen penetrated the FBI for over twenty years for the KGBwithout being caught. Similarly, Aldrich Ames acted as a KGB molein the CIA for more than ten years and passed all the CIA’s sophisticatedlie detector tests. Both Hanssen and Ames eluded intensive FBIand CIA investigations that lasted over a decade. According to VictorCherkashin, their KGB case officer, whom I interviewed in Moscowin 2015, the KGB was able to hide their existence from investigatorsfor such a long period partly because of the widespread belief in U.S.intelligence that moles were fictional creatures that sprang from the“paranoid mind” of James Jesus Angleton. When I then cited thesignature line from the movie The Usual Suspects, “The greatesttrick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn’t exist,”Cherkashin thinly smiled and said, “CIA denial [of moles] certainlyhelped.”In view of such past successes of the Russian intelligence services,it cannot be precluded that there was another person in the NSAworking with the enthusiastic Snowden as cover to prevent any lightfrom falling on his own surreptitious spying. While it may seemextremely unlikely that Snowden had such assistance, the alternativescenario, that Snowden broke into the sealed compartments andEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1559/29/16 5:51 PM156 | how america lost its secretsmade off with the documents without any assistance, seems equallyunlikely.Even if Snowden had been, as he claims, a pure idealist seekingto right a perceived wrong, it does not exclude the possibilityof his becoming entangled in the plots of others. Intelligence servicesmake it their business to bring about such witting or unwittingentanglements.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1569/29/16 5:51 PMc h a p t e r 16The Question of WhenThe NSA was actually concerned back in the time of the cryptowarswith improving American security. Nowadays, we see thattheir priority is weakening our security.— edward snowden, Moscow, 2015In his 1974 novel, Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy, John Le Carréhelped establish the concept in the public imagination of a moleburrowing into a rival intelligence service. Le Carré’s now-classicmole, code- named Gerald by the KGB, managed in the novel to gainaccess to the inner sanctum of the British intelligence service MI6.Aided and guided by his controllers in Moscow, he systematicallystole British intelligence secrets. As Le Carré wove the plot, the brilliantlyorchestrated operation involved spotting, compromising, andrecruiting others to gradually advance Gerald the mole to a positionof power. Such well- organized penetrations are not limited to fiction.The career of the KGB mole Heinz Felfe, who was advanced throughthe ranks of West German intelligence by an elaborate series of sacrificesby his controllers in Moscow until he actually headed WestGerman counterintelligence in 1961, could have served as the nonfictioninspiration for Le Carré’s 1963 novel, The Spy Who Camein from the Cold. As U.S. intelligence only found out after the ColdWar ended, the KGB also had the ability to sustain moles for decades.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1579/29/16 5:51 PM158 | how america lost its secretsThe CIA also had its share of long- term successes, such as AlexanderPoteyev, who fed the CIA secrets for over ten years whileburrowing into Russian intelligence. In the choreography of theseoperations, as in Le Carré’s fiction, rival intelligence services ensnaredand sacrificed recruits, as if playing a chess game, to advance theirmoles. Despite notable successes such as Felfe and Poteyev, a greatnumber of these elaborate conspiracies fail to insinuate a mole intotheir adversaries’ confidence. Intelligence services therefore alsotake advantage of a more prosaic source: the self- generated spy, or,as they are called in the trade, a “walk- in.”Although they are largely unsung in novels, these walk- ins are animportant part of espionage. A counterespionage review done for thePresidential Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board (PFIAB) in 1990found that most U.S. spies in the Cold War had taken documents ontheir own volition and only afterward offered them to an adversaryservice. Self- generated spies have diverse motives. Some intelligenceworkers steal secrets for financial gain. Others take them to furtheran ideological interest. As opportunistic enterprises, intelligence servicesdo not turn walk- ins away if they have valuable intelligence.Indeed, some of the most successful moles were not recruited, or evencontrolled, by spy agencies. They were self- generated penetrations,or “espionage sources,” as the KGB preferred to call them, who firststole secrets and later voluntarily delivered them to an adversary.Hanssen, who successfully penetrated the FBI for the Russianintelligence services from 1979 to 2001, according to the assessmentof a 2002 presidential commission, had caused “the worst intelligencedisaster in US history.” Eleven years later, George Ellard, aformer NSA inspector general who had been a member of that commission,compared Hanssen with Snowden “in that they both usedvery well- honed IT abilities to steal and disclose classified informationvital to our national security.”It is also possible to exploit a walk- in even after he has left hisservice. For example, the KGB major Anatoliy Golitsyn was an ideologicalself- generated spy who walked into the U.S. embassy in Helsinkion December 15, 1961. He asked to see the CIA officer on dutyand announced to him that he had collected a trove of KGB secrets,including information that could identify its key spies in the West.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1589/29/16 5:51 PMThe Question of When | 159He offered to defect to the United States. The CIA accepted his offer,and through this archive of secrets he had previously compiled, hebecame one of the CIA’s most productive sources in the Cold War.The job of an intelligence service is to take advantage of whateveropportunities come its way in the form of self- generated spies. Ifa Russian walk- in had not yet burned his bridges to his own service,U.S. intelligence officers were under instructions to attempt topersuade the walk- in to return to his post in Russia and serve as a“defector- in- place,” or mole. “While defectors can and do providecritical information,” a CIA memorandum on walk- ins during theCold War noted, “there are very few cases in which the same individualmay not have been of greater value if he had returned to hispost.” Of course, if a walk- in believed he was already compromised,as Golitsyn did, a decision would have to be made whether the valueof his intelligence merited exfiltrating him to the United States.This required evaluating the bona fides of the walk- in. Not allwalk- ins are accepted as defectors. Some walk- ins are deemed “dangles,”or agents dispatched by the KGB to test and confuse the CIA.Others are rejected as political liabilities, as happened to Wang Lijun,a well- connected police chief in China. In February 2012, Wangwalked into the U.S. consulate in Chengdu asking for asylum. TheState Department decided against it. After Wang left U.S. protection,he was arrested for corruption and received a fifteen- year prisonsentence. Such decisions about walk- ins are not made without dueconsideration, often at the highest level of a government, becauseexfiltrating a defector can result in diplomatic ruptures and politicalembarrassments.Conversely, it raises espionage concerns when an adversary governmentauthorizes the exfiltration of a rogue employee of an intelligenceservice. At minimum, it suggests that a rival governmentplaced value on what the defector could provide it. The Snowdencase is no exception. Whatever Snowden’s prior relations might havebeen with Russia, it can be assumed that after he fled to Moscow,in light of the intelligence value of the stolen documents, he wouldwind up in the hands of the Russian security services. That assumptionwas reinforced by subsequent countermeasures that wereimplemented by adversaries moved to block secret sources of NSAEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1599/29/16 5:51 PM160 | how america lost its secretssurveillance, as the CIA deputy director later revealed. Such movescould indicate that at least part of the U.S. communications intelligencethat Snowden had stolen was in enemy hands. The CIA andNSA’s monitoring of these countermeasures was itself extremelydelicate, because revealing what they learned about Russian andChinese countermeasures risked compromising even more U.S.communications sources than had Snowden.General Alexander said in his interview with The AustralianFinancial Review, “We absolutely need to know what Russia’sinvolvement is with Snowden.” He further said, “I think Snowdenis now being manipulated by Russian intelligence. I just don’t knowwhen that exactly started.” At what point did Snowden first come incontact with the Russians? The counterintelligence issue was not ifthis U.S. intelligence defector in Moscow was under Russian controlbut when he came under it.There were three possible time periods when Snowden mighthave been brought under control by the Russian intelligence service:while he was still working for the NSA; after he arrived in HongKong on May 20, 2013; or after he arrived in Russia on June 23,2013.The NSA ScenarioThe first scenario could stretch as far back as when Snowden wasforced out of the CIA in 2009. It will be recalled that the CIA hadplanned to launch a security investigation of Snowden, but it wasaborted when he resigned. He had also incurred large losses speculatingin the financial markets in Geneva, which is the kind of activitythat had in the past attracted the interest of foreign intelligenceservices. So it has to be considered in this scenario that Snowden hadbeen recruited by the Russians after he left the CIA and directed totake jobs at civilian contractors servicing the NSA.Such “career management,” as it is called by the CIA, couldexplain why Snowden had switched jobs in March 2013 to BoozAllen Hamilton, which, unlike his previous employer, Dell, allowedEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1609/29/16 5:51 PMThe Question of When | 161him to gain proximity to the super-secret lists of the telecommunicationssystems that the NSA had penetrated in Russia and China.This could account for how he managed to acquire the necessarypasswords to accrue privileged information. It could also account forwhy the documents he copied that pertained to NSA operations inRussia were not among those he gave to Poitras, Greenwald, andother journalists. Because Russia has had an active intelligencesharingtreaty with China since 1996, it could further explain whyhis first stop was Hong Kong, a part of China. It was a safe venue fordebriefing Snowden, as well as establishing his credentials amongjournalists as a whistle- blower, before a decision was made to allowhim to proceed to Russia.The nearly fatal problem with this early recruitment scenario isSnowden’s contacts with journalists. Snowden, it will be recalled,had contacted Greenwald in December 2012. Greenwald was a highprofileblogger in Brazil who did not use encryption or any securitysafeguards. Next, he contacted Poitras in January 2013 in Berlin;she was a magnet for NSA dissidents. Both of these contacts putSnowden’s clandestine downloading at grave risk. As known opponentsof U.S. intelligence agencies, these journalists might be, as theythemselves suspected they were, under surveillance by American,British, Brazilian, or German intelligence services. Greenwald andPoitras might also tell others who were either under surveillance orinformers. So no matter what precautions Snowden took, his secretenterprise, or just the fact he was in contact with anti- governmentactivists, might be detected. At minimum, he could lose his access tosecrets and be of no further use as a source at the NSA. He could alsobe interrogated and reveal the way he was brought under control. IfSnowden had actually been under the control of the Russian intelligenceservice, the last thing it would allow was for him to take sucha risk— or even to contact a single journalist. After all, the purposeof an espionage operation is to steal secrets without alerting anyoneto the theft.A former CIA officer told me that while anything could “go haywire”in an intelligence operation, it would be “unthinkable” thatthe Russian intelligence service would permit an undercover sourceEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1619/29/16 5:51 PM162 | how america lost its secretsit controlled in the NSA to expose himself by contacting journalists.Snowden’s continued interactions with Poitras and Greenwald makeit implausible that he was under Russian control before he went toHong Kong.The Hong Kong ScenarioThe most compelling support for the scenario that Snowden wasbrought under Russian control while he was in Hong Kong comes, itwill be recalled, from Vladimir Putin. His disclosure about the caseleaves little doubt that Russian officials had engaged Snowden inHong Kong, that Putin had authorized his trip to Moscow, and thatthe Russian government allowed him to fly to Moscow without aRussian visa. We know that Putin’s version is supported by U.S. surveillanceof Snowden’s activities in Hong Kong. We also know thatthe Russians went to some lengths not only to facilitate his trip toMoscow but to arrange to keep him in Russia. This supports thepossibility that the Russian intelligence service managed to bringSnowden under its sway during his thirty- four days in Hong Kong.The Russian intelligence service might even have been awareof Snowden and his anti- NSA activities before his arrival on May20. Snowden was anything but discreet in his contacts with strangersin the anti- surveillance movement, including such well- knownactivists as Runa Sandvik (to whom he revealed his true name andaddress via e- mail), Micah Lee, Jacob Appelbaum, Parker Higgins,and Laura Poitras. “It is not statistically improbable that members ofthis circle were being watched by a hostile service,” a former NSAcounterintelligence officer told me in 2015. When I told him thatPoitras and others in her circle had used PGP encryption, aliases,and Tor software in their exchanges with Snowden, he said, archinghis eyebrows, “That might work against amateurs, but it wouldn’tstop the Russians if they thought they might have a defector in theNSA.” He explained that both the NSA and hostile services have the“means” to bypass such safeguards.I asked what the Russian intelligence service would have done ifit had indeed spotted Snowden in late 2012 or early 2013. “MaybeEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1629/29/16 5:51 PMThe Question of When | 163just research him,” he replied. As we know now, he pointed out, Russiaand China probably had access to the 127- page standard form inhis personnel file that he updated in 2011. They also had the capabilityto track his air travel to Hong Kong. “Could someone havesteered him to Hong Kong?” I asked. He answered, with a shrug,“That depends on whether Snowden had a confidante who couldhave influenced him.”Whenever adversaries became aware of Snowden in this scenario,it was not until after he copied the NSA secrets and took them withhim to Hong Kong that Russian intelligence officers offered him adeal. So from the Russian point of view, Snowden had already burnedhis bridges. Because he had used other people’s passwords and accessprivileges to get into computers that he was not authorized to use,illegally moved documents, and given a false reason for his medicalleave, it was only a matter of time, as he told Greenwald in hisinterview in Hong Kong, before NSA investigators would identifyhim as a possible spy. He could be of no further use at the NSA to anadversary. His intelligence value now lay in the documents he hadtaken with him or stored in the cloud as well as his ability to helpclarify them in debriefing sessions. He could also inflict damage onthe morale and public standing of the NSA by denouncing its spyingin the media.Once Snowden was in Hong Kong, the Russians would have noreason to restrain him from holding a press event or releasing avideo. In fact, the KGB had organized press conferences for all theprevious NSA defectors to Moscow. Hong Kong was a perfect venuefor a well- staged media event because all the major newspapers inthe world had bureaus there. Snowden’s disclosures about NSA spyingcould serve to weaken the NSA’s relations with its allies.It is also possible that Russian or Chinese intelligence did notbecome aware of Snowden until after he went public in June byhaving The Guardian release his video. The video would have convincedthe Russians or the Chinese of how dissatisfied Snowden waswith the NSA. Because dissatisfaction is one of the classic means ofrecruitment in the intelligence business, he would certainly becomea prime target for recruitment after he went public.The CIA also considered the possibility that Snowden mightEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1639/29/16 5:51 PM164 | how america lost its secretshave been reeled in unwittingly. Morell suggested in his book thatSnowden might not himself have fully realized “when and how hewould be used.”It can be safely assumed that the decision made by Putin’s intelligenceservice to allow Snowden to travel to Russia proceeded fromsomething other than softhearted sentiment about his welfare. AfterPutin learned that there was an American in Hong Kong from the“special services” seeking to come to Russia, he also learned fromSnowden’s own disclosure on the video released that Snowden hadtaken a large number of NSA documents to Hong Kong: indeed,some were shown on the video. After that self- outing by Snowden,Putin had plenty of time to calculate the advantages and disadvantagesof allowing him to come to Moscow.Putin could offer him not only freedom from arrest but also aplatform to express his views. The exploitation of an intelligencedefector, even after he yields his secrets, can be the final stage ofa successful intelligence operation. The CIA considered one of itsgreatest coups of the Cold War its release of the espionage- acquiredsecret speech of Nikita Khrushchev to the Communist Party of theSoviet Union in 1956 exposing the transgressions of the previousregime of Joseph Stalin. Making public these deeds was meant bythe CIA to sow discord both inside the Soviet Union and to disruptits relations with its allies. General Alexander suggested that Putinmight similarly be “looking to capitalize on the fact that [Snowden’s]actions are enormously disruptive and damaging to US interests.”This potential gain, if Alexander’s assessment is correct, providedPutin with an additional reason to have his representatives in HongKong offer Snowden exfiltration.Snowden was in no position to refuse. After the release of thevideo, there was no going back to America without his facing adetermined criminal prosecution. He would have known that inalmost every prior case intelligence workers who had intentionallyreleased even a single classified document had gone to prison. As hisInternet postings show, he had closely followed the ordeal of BradleyManning, whose trial was coming to its conclusion while Snowdenwas in Hong Kong. Manning had been kept in solitary confinementEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1649/29/16 5:51 PMThe Question of When | 165under horrific conditions for over a year while awaiting his trial andwas facing a long prison sentence. There was no reason for Snowdento expect a better outcome for himself if he returned to the UnitedStates or was arrested anywhere else that had an extradition treatywith the United States. As the Russian officials in Hong Kong wouldhave informed him, Russia had no extradition treaty with the UnitedStates. It was also one of the few places in the world that he couldreach from Hong Kong without flying through airspace in which hemight be intercepted by a U.S. ally. Snowden was told he could takethe direct Aeroflot flight to Moscow without a valid passport or visa.That Snowden’s alternative to going to Russia was going to prisongave the Russians considerable leverage in Hong Kong. The Russian“diplomats” could have used this leverage to extract a quid proquo. The price of admission might have meant putting himself in thehands of Russian intelligence and telling it all he knew.The Moscow ScenarioThe final possibility is that Snowden did not come under Russiancontrol until after he arrived in Moscow. After assessing the negativeattitude that Snowden expressed toward government authorityon the video that was released by The Guardian, the Russian “diplomats”in Hong Kong might have concluded that Snowden could boltif too much pressure was exerted on him there. The Russians couldafford to be patient. They knew that Interpol and the United Stateswould be pursuing Snowden throughout the world and that he hadno valid travel documents and that his credit cards had been frozen.They would likely know that Sarah Harrison had arranged his flightto Moscow on June 23. So they had no urgent need to apply pressureon him before his plane landed in Russia.After the Russians took him in a “special operation” from theplane at the airport, he was informed by Russian authorities thathe would not be allowed to go to Cuba, Venezuela, Iceland, Ecuador,or any other country without the permission of Russian officials,which would not be immediately forthcoming. He was now at theEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1659/29/16 5:51 PM166 | how america lost its secretsmercy of the Russian authorities. There was good reason for keepinghim in a virtual prison in Russia. “He can compromise thousandsof intelligence and military officials,” Sergei Alexandrovich Markov,the co- chairman of the National Strategic Council of Russia and anadviser to Putin, pointed out. “We can’t send him back just becauseAmerica demands it.”So Snowden was consigned to the transit zone of the airport,which is a twilight zone neither inside nor outside Russia, a netherworldthat extends beyond the confines of the airport to include safehouses and other facilities maintained by the FSB for the purposesof interrogation and security. Stranded at the Moscow airport, nomatter what he had believed earlier in Hong Kong, Snowden wouldquickly realize that he had only one viable option: seeking protectionin Russia.Even though the FSB is known by U.S. intelligence to strictlycontrol the movements and contacts of former members of foreignintelligence services in Russia, Snowden might not have realized thefull extent of the FSB’s interest in him. He naively told The WashingtonPost in December 2013, in Moscow, “I am still working forthe NSA right now. They are the only ones who don’t realize it.”Whatever he might have been thinking, a former U.S. communicationsintelligence worker who stole American state secrets, such asSnowden, would be under the FSB’s scrutiny.Andrei Soldatov, the co- author of the 2010 book The New Nobility:The Restoration of Russia’s Security State and the EnduringLegacy of the KGB, who was personally knowledgeable aboutFSB procedures, explained the FSB would monitor “every facet ofSnowden’s communications, and his life.” General Oleg Kalugin,who, as previously mentioned, defected from the KGB to the UnitedStates in 1995, added that the FSB (following the standard operatingprocedures of the KGB) would be “his hosts and they are taking careof him.” Kalugin further said in 2014, “Whatever he had access to inhis former days at NSA, I believe he shared all of it with the Russians,and they are very grateful.” This assessment was backed by FrantsKlintsevich. As the first deputy chairman of the Kremlin’s defenseand security committee at the time of Snowden’s defection, he wasEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1669/29/16 5:51 PMThe Question of When | 167in a position to know Snowden’s contribution. “Let’s be frank,” hesaid in a taped interview with NPR (in Russian), “Snowden did shareintelligence. This is what security services do. If there’s a possibilityto get information, they will get it.”Even without Klintsevich’s comments, top American intelligenceofficers had little doubt that the Russian security services would dotheir job. Michael Hayden, for example, who in succession headedthree American intelligence services, was certainly in a position toappreciate the capabilities of the Russian and Chinese intelligenceservices. He told me in 2014 that he saw no other possibility thanthat Snowden would be induced to cooperate in this situation, saying,“I would lose all respect for the Russian and Chinese securityservices if they haven’t fully exploited everything Snowden had togive.” They certainly had that opportunity when Snowden spentalmost six weeks at Sheremetyevo International Airport. The FSBcontrolled his access to food, lodgings, the Internet, and whateverelse he needed to survive there. If he did not cooperate, the FSBcould also return him to the United States, where in the eyes of theDepartment of Justice he had betrayed the United States by stealingsecrets and taking them abroad. What recourse did Snowden have?In a word, the FSB held all the cards but one— Snowden’s help withthe stolen documents. Even if Snowden disliked the tactics of theRussian security services, he now had a powerful inducement not todecline the requests of the Russian authorities.Two weeks after his arrival, the Russian authorities provided himwith a convenient path to full cooperation with Russia. He was putin contact with Anatoly Grigorievich Kucherena, a silver- haired,fifty- two- year- old lawyer who is known to be a personal friend ofPutin’s. Kucherena did tasks for Putin’s party in the Russian parliament,or Duma. He had excellent connections in the Russian securityapparatus because he served on the oversight committee of theFSB. Kucherena offered to serve as Snowden’s pro bono lawyer. OnJuly 12, Snowden officially retained him as his legal representative inMoscow. In explaining the relationship, Kucherena said, “Officially,he is my client, but at the same time, I provide a number of otherservices to him.” According to Kucherena, Snowden turned downEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1679/29/16 5:51 PM168 | how america lost its secretsall requests to meet with any representative of the U.S. embassy inMoscow. From that point on, he would act as Snowden’s go- betweenwith the FSB and other Russian agencies.At the outset, Kucherena made it clear to Snowden that he wouldhave to play by Moscow’s rules before the Kremlin would grant himpermission to stay in Russia. To begin with, Snowden had to withdrawany applications he had made elsewhere for asylum. He had toput his fate entirely in the hands of Putin’s Russia. He would alsohave to be fully candid with the Russian authorities on what was ofgreat value to Putin: the secret documents he had acquired.Eighteen days later, Snowden received Russian identificationpapers that allowed him to resettle in Moscow. He was providedwith a residence and allowed to set up a broadcasting studio in itthat he could use for Internet appearances at well- attended eventsaround the world, such as South by Southwest and TED. Snowdenwas, according to Kucherena, also furnished with bodyguards. Tohelp earn his keep, he was said by Kucherena to be employed at anunidentified Moscow cyber- security firm. To complete his resettlement,Lindsay Mills, whom he had left behind in Hawaii, was givena three- month visa and was allowed to temporarily live with him inMoscow. This afforded him a lifestyle that Snowden described in aninterview as “great.”It would strain credibility that such privileges would be awarded toan intelligence defector who had refused to cooperate with Russianauthorities. In Snowden’s case, he was even allowed to participate inPutin’s telethon on state- controlled television. On it, he was calledon to ask Putin if the Russian government violated the privacy ofRussian citizens in the same way that the American governmentviolated the rights of its citizens. Putin, smiling at Snowden’s presumablyvetted question, answered in a single word: “No.”In the Moscow scenario, the Russians acted to advance their interests.They gave Snowden sanctuary, support, perks, and high- leveltreatment because he agreed to cooperate with them. If Snowdenhad not paid this basic price of admission, either in Russia or beforehis arrival, he would not have been accorded this privileged status.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1689/29/16 5:51 PMc h a p t e r 17The Keys to the KingdomAre MissingThere’s a zero percent chance the Russians or Chinese havereceived any documents.— edward snowden, Moscow, 2013Acritical missing piece in the Snowden enigma is the whereaboutsof the NSA documents. Greenwald told the AssociatedPress that the documents that Snowden had taken from the NSAconstituted “the instruction manual for how the NSA is built” andthat they “would allow somebody who read them to know exactlyhow the NSA does what it does, which would in turn allow them toevade that surveillance or replicate it.” Snowden, for his part, said oncamera in his Hong Kong interview in June 2013 that NSA investigatorswould have “a heart attack” when they discovered the extentof the breach.Ledgett, the NSA official who had conducted the damage assessment,while not having a heart attack, confirmed that Snowden hadtaken a massive number of documents and among them was whathe deemed the NSA’s “keys to the kingdom.” These keys could presumablyopen up the mechanism through which the United Stateslearns about the secret activities of other nations and, by doing so,bring down the American signals intelligence system that had forEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1699/29/16 5:51 PM170 | how america lost its secretssixty years monitored government communications. It had also kepttrack of adversaries’ missile telemetry, submarine movements, andnuclear proliferation.The Snowden breach was not without precedent at the NSA.There had been two Russian spies at the NSA during the ColdWar, Jack Dunlap and David Sheldon Boone, who took a limitednumber of documents, but no one since the end of the Cold Waris known to have taken a single NSA classified document. Now aninsider had removed a vast number of the NSA’s documents. Manyof these documents were classified TS/SCI— “Top Secret, SensitiveCompartmented Information”— which, as NSA secrets went, weredeemed the gold standard of espionage because they revealed thesources used in communications intelligence. Whatever the assessmentof Snowden’s motivation, the single question that needed to beanswered was, what happened to these stolen files?Recall the huge disparity between the number of documents thatthe NSA calculated that Snowden compromised and the number ofdocuments he is known to have handed over to journalists in HongKong on a thumb drive. When the House and Senate IntelligenceCommittees asked the NSA how many documents Snowden took,the NSA could not come up with a definitive number despite havingemployed a world- class team of experts to reconstruct the crime. TheNSA could say that 1.7 million documents had been selected in twodozen NSA computers during Snowden’s brief tenure at Booz Allenin 2013, including documents from the Department of Defense, theNSA, and the CIA. Of these “touched” documents, some 1.3 millionhad been copied and moved to another computer.There was evidence that Snowden had used preprogrammed spidersto find and index the documents. He had said that he took thejob at Booz Allen to get access to data that he copied. So as far as theNSA was concerned, of course, the 1.3 million documents he copiedand moved were considered compromised. On top of this haul,Snowden had copied files while working at Dell in 2012. As a systemadministrator there, he could download data without leaving adigital trail. As previously mentioned, more than half the documentsactually published in newspapers had been taken during Snowden’stime at Dell.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1709/29/16 5:51 PMThe Keys to the Kingdom Are Missing | 171Snowden’s supporters do not accept that he stole such a large numberof documents. According to Greenwald, the NSA vastly exaggeratedthe magnitude of the theft in order to “demonize” Snowden.Snowden also disputed the magnitude of the 1.7 million number. Hetold James Bamford of Wired in early 2014 that he took far fewerthan the 1.7 million documents that the NSA reported were compromised.He offered, however, no more specific details on the magnitudeof his theft. Nor did he offer Bamford any way to verify hisassertion other than to say that he had purposely left behind “a trailof digital bread crumbs” at the NSA base in Hawaii so that the NSAcould determine which documents he “touched” but did not download.A government official familiar with the investigation said nosuch “bread crumbs” were found by the NSA.It is possible that the NSA Damage Assessment team under Ledgettfalsified its findings or otherwise inflated the number of documentsthat Snowden stole. NSA executives might have also liedto Congress to exaggerate the loss. But why would these officialsengage in an orchestrated deception that made them look bad? Exaggeratingthe magnitude of the theft would only magnify Ledgett andthe NSA’s failure in its mission to protect U.S. secrets.Officials had no reason to demonize Snowden for legal reasons.He already had been. Greenwald and Poitras had already revealedthat Snowden had given them a vast number of NSA classified documentson a thumb drive that revealed, as Greenwald put it, the “blueprints”of the NSA. This drive contained, it will be recalled, no fewerthan 58,000 highly classified documents. In the eyes of the law, thatconstituted an unprecedented breach of the laws passed to protectcommunications intelligence. In any case, in Russia Snowden wasnot in any jeopardy, no matter how many documents he was said tohave stolen. Interestingly, the thirty- five- page Defense IntelligenceAgency’s damage assessment reports that 900,000 Pentagon documentscompromised by Snowden were not made public. That wasonly disclosed via a Vice magazine Freedom of Information requestin June 2015.Many of the putative 1.3 million documents that the NSA sayswere copied and moved were duplicate copies. Others were outdatedor otherwise useless routing data. So the quantity does not tell theEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1719/29/16 5:51 PM172 | how america lost its secretswhole story. Of far more importance is the quality of some of thedata that Snowden had copied. Just a single one of these documentscould cripple not just the NSA but America’s entire multibilliondollarapparatus for intercepting foreign intelligence. The previouslycited road map, which was thirty- one thousand pages long, listedcritical gaps in U.S. coverage of China, Russia, and other adversaries,including those cited by President Obama’s national security team.It was not found among the files on the thumb drive given to Poitrasand Greenwald. Nor were most of the missing Level 3 lists concerningNSA activities in Russia and China found on the thumb drive,even though Snowden said he had taken his final job at Booz Allento get access to these lists. If Snowden had not given these documentsto Poitras, Greenwald, or other journalists, where were they?The compartment logs showed that Snowden copied and transferredthese Level 3 documents in his final week at the NSA. Hepresumably had them in his possession in Hong Kong when hearrived on May 20. On June 3, according to Greenwald, Snowdenwas still sorting through the documents to determine which oneswere appropriate to give to journalists. On June 12, he told thereporter Lana Lam in Hong Kong that he was going through thedocuments, country by country, to determine which additional oneshe should pass on to journalists. Eleven days later, he departed HongKong for Moscow carrying at least one laptop computer. After arrivingin Moscow, he suggested he still had NSA secrets in his possession.“No intelligence service— not even our own— has the capacityto compromise the secrets I continue to protect,” he wrote to theformer senator Gordon Humphrey. “I cannot be coerced into revealingthat information, even under torture.” Much of the material hecopied while working at Booz Allen remained, as far as the NSAcould determine, missing. Had he brought these files under his “protection”to Russia?An answer soon came from Snowden’s Moscow lawyer. On September23, Anatoly Kucherena was extensively interviewed on theRT channel in Russia. The interviewer, Sophie Shevardnadze, whohad a show called SophieCo, was a well- admired journalist. She isthe granddaughter of Eduard Shevardnadze, a former foreign minis-Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1729/29/16 5:51 PMThe Keys to the Kingdom Are Missing | 173ter and Politburo member of the Soviet Union and, after the SovietUnion broke up, the first president of Georgia. Even though she hadinterviewed many top political figures in Russia, obtaining an hourlonginterview with Kucherena was a coup because, until then, hehad not discussed Snowden in a television interview.About halfway through the interview, Shevardnadze broughtup the highly sensitive subject of the disposition of the NSA documents.If anyone was in a position to know about these documents,it was Kucherena. He had acted as an intermediary for Snowdenin his negotiations with Russian authorities, including the FSB. Assuch, he would be privy to the status of the secret material that wasof interest to the Russian intelligence services. When I interviewedKucherena in Moscow in 2015, he told me that “all the reports” concerningSnowden had been turned over to him by “Russian authorities”in July 2013. “I had all of Snowden’s statements,” he said. If so,he presumably knew what Snowden had told the Russian securityservices.Had Snowden come to Russia with empty hands or bearing gifts?Shevardnadze directly asked Kucherena if Snowden had given allthe documents he had taken from the NSA to journalists in HongKong. Kucherena answered her question without any evasion, sayingthat Snowden had only given “some” of the NSA’s documents inhis possession to journalists in Hong Kong. He had kept the remainingdocuments in his possession. That confirmed what Snowden hadtold Greenwald, Poitras, and Lam in Hong Kong. Snowden told themthat he had divided the stolen NSA documents into two separate setsof documents. One set he gave to Poitras and Greenwald on thumbdrives. The other set, which he told them he considered too sensitivefor these journalists, he retained for himself. U.S. investigatorsat the NSA, the CIA, and the Department of Defense would like toknow what Snowden did with the set of documents he had retainedfor himself and had not shared with the journalists in Hong Kong.Shevardnadze, who makes it a point to drill her interviewees,pressed Kucherena as to whether Snowden still had these NSA files,or “material,” in Russia. The dialogue went as follows (from thetranscript supplied to me by Shevardnadze).Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1739/29/16 5:51 PM174 | how america lost its secretsshevardnadze: So he [Snowden] does have some materials thathaven’t been made public yet?kucherena: Certainly.Shevardnadze asked the next logical question: “Why did Russiaget involved in this whole thing if it got nothing out of it?”“Snowden spent quite a few years working for the CIA. We haven’tfully realized yet the importance of his revelations.” Kucherena wason the FSB’s public oversight board. He was clearly in the picture.Kucherena’s answer was completely consistent with the statementSnowden made three weeks after arriving in Russia in his previouslymentioned e- mail to Senator Humphrey.It is certainly possible that Snowden transferred the NSA filesfrom his own computers and thumb drives to storage on a remoteserver in the cloud before coming to Russia. The “cloud” is actuallynot in the sky but a term used for remote storage servers, such asthose provided by Dropbox, Microsoft, Google, Amazon, and otherInternet companies. Anyone who is connected to the Internet canstore and retrieve files by entering a user name and a password.For Kucherena to be certain Snowden had access to the so- farunrevealeddata, Snowden must have demonstrated his access eitherto him or to the authorities. The Russians obviously knew Snowdenhad the means to retrieve this data one way or the other. Because thedata concerned electronic espionage against Russia, the FSB wouldhave been keen to obtain the documents, and the FSB is not knownto take no for an answer in issues involving espionage.Even if Snowden refused to furnish his key encryption, accordingto a former National Security Council staffer, the Russian cyberservice in 2013 had the means, the time, and the incentive to breakthe encryption. It is unlikely it would have had to go through thetrouble. It doesn’t take a great stretch of the imagination to concludethat, willingly or under duress, Snowden shared his access to histreasure trove of documents with the agencies that were literally incontrol of his life in Russia.Kucherena’s answer on the television program may also help toexplain Putin’s decision to allow Snowden to come to Moscow. Itwas not a minor sacrifice for Putin. His foreign minister, Sergei Lav-Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1749/29/16 5:51 PMThe Keys to the Kingdom Are Missing | 175rov, had spent almost six months negotiating with Hillary Clinton’sState Department a one- on- one summit between President Obamaand President Putin. Not only would this summit be a diplomaticcoup for Russia, but also it would add to Putin’s personal credibilityin advance of the Olympic Games in Russia. In mid- June, afterU.S. intelligence reported to Obama’s national security adviser thatSnowden was in contact with Russian officials in Hong Kong, theState Department explicitly told Lavrov that allowing Snowdento defect to Russia would be viewed by President Obama as a blatantlyunfriendly act. As such, it could (and did) lead to the cancellationof the planned summit. Putin knew the downside of admittingSnowden.But if Snowden had a large archive of files containing the sourcesof the NSA’s electronic interceptions, as Snowden claimed he had inHong Kong, there was an enormous potential intelligence upside.Putin had to choose between the loss of an Obama summit andan intelligence coup. Would Putin have made the choice he did ifSnowden had destroyed, or refused to share, the stolen data?“No country, not even the United States, would grant sanctuaryto an intelligence defector who refused to be cooperative,” answereda former CIA officer who had spent a decade dealing with Russianintelligence defectors. “That’s not how it works.” If so, it seems plausibleto believe that, as Kucherena said, the documents Snowdenbrought to Russia explain why Russia exfiltrated him from HongKong and provided him with a safe haven.The Quickly Changing NarrativeThree weeks after Kucherena’s appearance on Shevardnadze’s show,on October 17, Snowden had his first interview exchange with ajournalist since his arrival in Russia. It was over the Internet withJames Risen of The New York Times, as noted earlier. Snowden nowasserted a very different narrative. The subsequent front- page story,which carried the headline “Snowden Says He Took No Secret Filesto Russia,” reported that Snowden claimed he gave all his documentsto journalists in Hong Kong and brought none of them to Russia. HeEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1759/29/16 5:51 PM176 | how america lost its secretsalso said that he was “100 percent” certain that no foreign intelligenceservice had had access to them at any point during his journeyfrom Honolulu to Moscow. When I later asked Kucherena in Moscowwhy Snowden changed his story in direct contradiction of whatKucherena had stated, he said, “Wizner.”He was referring to Ben Wizner, Snowden’s ACLU lawyer inWashington, D.C. Wizner had joined the ACLU in August 2001after graduating from NYU Law School and clerking for a federaljudge. At the ACLU, he became an effective foe of NSA surveillance.“I had spent ten years before this [Snowden leak] trying to bringlawsuits against the intelligence community,” he explained in aninterview with Forbes in 2014. Prior to the Snowden leak, he hadfrequently been consulted by Poitras on government surveillanceissues (and appeared in Poitras’s 2010 documentary, The Oath). Hehad also been engaged in a lawsuit aimed at exposing the NSA’s subpoenasfor Verizon records.He had first learned about Snowden from Poitras in January2013 while Snowden was still working for Dell at the NSA base inHawaii. At that time, Poitras did not know Snowden’s real name, butshe informed Wizner that she was in touch with a person identifyinghimself as a senior officer in U.S. intelligence. (Poitras did notknow at that time that her source, Snowden, was lying to her abouthis position.) Wizner also was shown e-mails by Poitras in whichSnowden said he had information about the government’s secretdomestic surveillance program. Wizner, according to Poitras, advisedher to stay in touch with this source.On July 13, 2013, after Snowden asked for asylum in Russia,Kucherena arranged an encrypted chat between Snowden and Wizner.According to Wizner, Snowden asked him at the outset, “Do youhave standing now?” It was a question that suggested that Snowdenwas aware that the ACLU needed to gain standing in federal court tochallenge the government’s alleged domestic surveillance. Up untilnow, it was unsuccessful because it had no way to show it was a victimof surveillance. The FISA order to Verizon, which Snowden hadtaken had provided that standing to Wizner and the ACLU.Aside from the opportunity Snowden offered the ACLU, Wiznerno doubt believed in the salutary benefit of Snowden’s revela-Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1769/29/16 5:51 PMThe Keys to the Kingdom Are Missing | 177tions. When they discussed Snowden’s legal situation in America,Snowden expressed an interest in obtaining some form of amnestyfrom prosecution. Wizner was willing to attempt to explore makinga possible deal with the Department of Justice, but it would not be aneasy task, especially if Snowden had turned over NSA documents toa foreign power.Even to argue that Snowden was merely an NSA whistle- blowerpresented a serious challenge for Wizner. The ACLU had beeninvolved with previous NSA whistle- blowers, but Snowden’s casediffered from those cases in important ways. Those whistle- blowershad not intentionally taken any NSA documents. Snowden, on theother hand, had not only taken a large number of NSA documentsbut also released tens of thousands of these top secret files to journalistsbased in Germany and Brazil, as well as to other unauthorizedrecipients. In addition, the Whistleblower Protection Act, passedby Congress in 1989, does not exempt an insider, such as Snowden,who signs a secrecy oath from the legal consequences of disclosingclassified documents to journalists or other unauthorized people.Consequently, getting some form of amnesty for Snowden requiredbolstering his image as a person taking personal risks to fight forAmerica. But if Snowden had taken even a single top secret documentto Russia, it would strengthen the case in the court of publicopinion that he had stolen communications intelligence secrets withthe intent to damage the United States, which under the provisionsof federal law could be considered espionage. In this regard, Kucherena’sdisclosure was extremely damaging to Snowden’s position, andSnowden had, after all, already found refuge in Russia. Snowdenhad two options, according to Wizner, the “first is to be where he isin Russia. And the second is to be in a maximum security prison cell,cut off from the world.” These, of course, would be the options ofany espionage defector who fled to Russia.One way to mitigate the damage was for Snowden to substitutea new narrative. Wizner took it upon himself to screen potentialjournalists and other outlets for Snowden. He told a reporter forThe New York Times that, except for Oliver Stone, all individualswho have “met with Snowden have just gone through me, andwe’ve hooked it up.” Nor did he limit his extraordinary control toEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1779/30/16 11:09 AM178 | how america lost its secretsinterviews. In the case of Stone’s movie Snowden, Wizner asked forthe right to veto any shots featuring Snowden in the film. In it, hewould tell handpicked journalists that he had given all his documentsto Poitras and Greenwald in Hong Kong and took none ofthem to Russia. Wizner could then argue that documents such as theFISA court order were improperly classified secret and that disclosingthem served the public good. The government might not be ableto contest his claim without further revealing NSA sources. Underthese circumstances, it might be induced to agree to a plea bargainfor Snowden. Changing the narrative would also help enhance hispublic image as a whistle- blower.Snowden’s new narrative that he had destroyed all the documentshe had in his possession before coming to Moscow and had no accessto any NSA documents, not even those that he had distributed tojournalists, was reinforced in a series of interviews that Wiznerhelped arrange. “I went the first six months without giving an interview,”Snowden later said. “It wasn’t until December 2013 that Igave my first interview to Barton Gellman.” (Snowden did not counthis Internet exchange with Risen in October as an “interview”.)In late December 2013, Snowden met with Barton Gellman. It washis first face- to- face meeting with a journalist since he had arrived inRussia in June. Snowden turned his laptop toward Gellman and, asif proving his point, said to him, “There’s nothing on it. . . . My harddrive is completely blank.” That his computer had no files stored onit at that moment of course meant very little. Just six weeks earlier,Snowden had met with the former CIA officer Ray McGovern, whohad been invited to meet him in Moscow along with three otherAmerican whistle- blowers. At that meeting, he told McGovern thathe had stored all the NSA data he had taken on external hard drives.Gellman asked about the precise whereabouts of the files, but, as hereported, Snowden declined to answer that question. He would onlysay that he was “confident he did not expose them to Chinese intelligencein Hong Kong.” That answer did not nail down the issue,so Wizner arranged for Vanity Fair, which was preparing an articleon Snowden, to submit questions. In his reply to them, Snowdenwrote that he destroyed all his files in Hong Kong because he didn’tEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1789/30/16 11:09 AMThe Keys to the Kingdom Are Missing | 179want to risk bringing them to Russia. He expanded on this claim inthree more interviews. These interviews were all with three journalistswho had opposed NSA surveillance: James Bamford, writingfor Wired magazine; Alan Rusbridger, the editor of The Guardian;and Katrina vanden Heuvel, the editor of The Nation. He also gavea televised interview to Brian Williams of NBC News in which heexplained that because he had no access to the NSA documents inRussia, he could not provide access to the Russians even if they“break my fingers.”Snowden did not specify where, when, or how the putativedestruction of the files occurred and offered neither witnesses norevidence, other than the meaningless blank laptop screen, to corroborateit. Still his new self- serving narrative was widely acceptedby the media. The fact remains, though, that Snowden went to considerablerisk to select, copy, and steal Level 3 documents beforeleaving Hawaii for Hong Kong. These secrets were his last potentialbargaining chips. Why would he have destroyed them in June inHong Kong?It is also difficult for me to accept that Snowden would destroythese documents because he feared the Russians might get them.If he was so concerned about the possibility, he could have stayedin Hong Kong and fought extradition instead of flying to Russia.Surely he must have realized that even without the files on his computer,the Russian intelligence service could still obtain the NSAsecrets he held in his head. Indeed, as he told the Times, the secretshe held in his head would have devastating consequences for NSAoperations.In light of Kucherena’s statement that in Russia Snowden hadaccess to NSA documents, it would require a serious suspension ofdisbelief to accept Snowden’s new narrative. Even if one were willingto accept his new claim, it still would not mean that the NSAdocuments had not fallen into the hands of adversaries. If he haddestroyed all of the electronic copies of the NSA’s data before boardinghis flight to Moscow, he still couldn’t be “100 percent” certain, ashe claimed, that the data had not been accessed by others prior to hisdeparture from Hong Kong. His files could have been copied with-Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1799/29/16 5:51 PM180 | how america lost its secretsout his knowledge, just as he had copied them without the NSA’sknowledge. As former U.S. intelligence officers pointed out to me,adversary services could not be expected to shirk from employingtheir full capabilities once they learned that an American “agent ofspecial services,” as Putin called him, had brought stolen NSA documentsto Hong Kong.The Times reported from Hong Kong that two sources, both ofwhom worked for major government intelligence agencies, “saidthey believed that the Chinese government had managed to drainthe contents” of the laptop that Snowden brought to Hong Kong.That China had the capability to obtain Snowden’s data was alsothe view of the former CIA deputy director Morell. He said, “Boththe Chinese and the Russians would have used everything in theirtool kit— from human approaches to technical attacks— to get atSnowden’s stolen data.”Snowden would not have been a particularly difficult target forthem, especially after he started disclosing secrets to journalists atthe Mira hotel. Not only could the Chinese service approach thesecurity staff at the Mira, but they could track him after he left thehotel and moved, along with his computers, in and out of severalresidences arranged by his carer. Snowden, after all, had put himselfin the hands of people whom he had never met before, includingthree Hong Kong lawyers, a carer, and three Guardian journalists.It is likely that the efforts of these adversary intelligence services tofind him, and the NSA data, would further intensify after Snowdenrevealed to the South China Morning Post on June 12 that he hadaccess to NSA lists of computers in China and elsewhere that theNSA had penetrated.It wouldn’t be only the Chinese service on his trail. The Russianintelligence service would also likely be tasked to acquire theseNSA documents after Snowden’s meeting with Russian officials inHong Kong. And while he could get away with giving coy and elusiveanswers to journalists who asked him about the whereabouts ofthe NSA data, the Russian and Chinese officials in Hong Kong whocould offer him an escape route from prison would likely demandmore specific answers about the whereabouts of data they had notalready obtained by technical means.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1809/29/16 5:51 PMThe Keys to the Kingdom Are Missing | 181The Post– Hong Kong DocumentsThe NSA concern about who had access to its missing files deepenedfurther when NSA documents continued to surface in the press afterSnowden went to Moscow. If U.S. intelligence needed any furtherevidence that someone had access to the documents, these additionalrevelations provided it.The most sensational of them was a purported document attributedto Snowden concerning the NSA hacking of the cell phone ofthe German chancellor, Angela Merkel. The story was publishedon October 23 on the Der Spiegel website. Appelbaum was the coauthorof the story. Even though Snowden had by now been in Russiafor four months, he was cited in the story, along with unnamed“others,” as the source for the NSA document. Snowden did notdeny it. Indeed, he took a measure of credit for the revelation, sayingon German TV, “What I can say is we know Angela Merkel wasmonitored by the National Security Agency.” If Snowden had beeninvolved in the release of this document, it would be consistent withKucherena’s assertion that he had access to the archive.Adding to the intrigue, Poitras was apparently caught by surprisewhen the Merkel story broke in Der Spiegel. She urgently textedSnowden on what she called “background” (which ordinarily meansthat a journalist will not attribute information to a source). She askedhim in the text to explain the NSA’s actions. Snowden explained toher that Merkel was listed by her true name (and not by a code name)in the NSA document because the German chancellor was an NSA“target not an asset.” Presumably, Poitras would have already knownthat distinction if she had the document referred to in Der Spiegel.If the Merkel document was not among the data given to Poitras inHong Kong, how did it get to the authors of the Der Spiegel article?Appelbaum, of course, had been in contact with Snowden before hewent public. He had served as Poitras’s co- interrogator of Snowdenwhile he was still working at the NSA in May 2013. Appelbaumwas also one of the leading supporters of WikiLeaks. Because hewas famously an advocate of revealing government secrets, it seemsunlikely that he would have delayed releasing such a bombshellabout Merkel’s phone if Snowden had given him this documentEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1819/29/16 5:51 PM182 | how america lost its secretsbefore he left Hong Kong in June 2013. Why would Appelbaum keepit secret for more than four months? The same pressure to publishwould also apply to the journalists Snowden had dealt with in HongKong. If Snowden had given Poitras, Greenwald, Lam, or MacAskillthe Merkel document, or even told them about it in their interviewswith him in Hong Kong, The Guardian would have certainly rushedout such a scoop.According to a source with knowledge of the Snowden investigation,there was no document referencing any spying on Merkel’sphone among the fifty- eight thousand documents on the thumbdrive that Snowden had given to Poitras and Greenwald in HongKong. That absence would explain why Poitras had to send a text toSnowden in Moscow to ask for an explanation after the story broke.Further confirmation of the absence of this document in thematerial Snowden provided journalists in Hong Kong comes fromJames Bamford, a well- respected expert on the NSA. In the courseof researching his 2014 article on Snowden for Wired, he was givenaccess to all the documents Snowden gave to Poitras, Greenwald, andGellman. Bamford used a sophisticated indexing program to searchthrough the database specifically for the Merkel material. He did notfind any. He reported that no document given to journalists in HongKong even mentioned Merkel. It therefore appeared that the Merkeldocument was provided to Der Spiegel after Snowden went to Moscow.If so, some party had access to NSA documents after Snowdenarrived in Russia and provided the Der Spiegel authors with thescoop. In that context, it might not have been a pure coincidence thatKucherena disclosed that Snowden had access to documents that hehad not given to journalists in Hong Kong shortly before just such adocument was published in Germany.Bamford explored the possibility that there might be another personin the NSA who was stealing documents. He wrote to Poitrasand asked her whether the Merkel document could have come fromanother person in the NSA. She declined, via a letter from her lawyer,to answer that question. But because she had not been the author ofthe Der Spiegel article, and had not been given the document, thereis no reason to believe that she would know its provenance.Documents continued to emerge years after Snowden arrived inEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1829/29/16 5:51 PMThe Keys to the Kingdom Are Missing | 183Moscow that were more embarrassing to America. In June 2015, theWikiLeaks website released another putative Snowden document,two years after he had supposedly wiped his computer clean in HongKong. It revealed that the NSA had targeted the telephones of threeconsecutive presidents of France— Jacques Chirac, Nicolas Sarkozy,and François Hollande.According to a former NSA official, this document, like the 2013Merkel material, was not among the data on the thumb drive givento journalists in Hong Kong, which Greenwald confirmed. Greenwaldsuggested to The New York Times that it might have been stolenby another penetration in the NSA, presumably one who hadaccess to the same secret compartments as Snowden in 2013. SinceGreenwald and Poitras had no way of knowing about the documentsthat Snowden did not give them, it is equally possible that the Russianintelligence services obtained this document from Snowden andlater gave it to WikiLeaks. The release on Assange’s WikiLeaks sitecame in the midst of NATO war games held near the Russian border,which Putin had vehemently denounced. The accompanying articlewas co- authored by Assange, who now claimed to have access toSnowden’s NSA material. Because Assange had been in telephoniccontact with Snowden in Hong Kong, and his deputy, Sarah Harrison,had spent five months in Moscow with Snowden in 2013, itis certainly possible Snowden was his source. But it seems difficultto believe that Assange waited two years before publishing becausehe has made it part of his modus operandi to publish documentsimmediately. Because WikiLeaks receives documents anonymouslyvia its Tor software, any party with access to the Snowden filescould have sent it. Subsequently, in July 2016, Assange released viaWikiLeaks a cache of politically disruptive documents from the filesof the Democratic National Committee. U.S. intelligence stronglysuspected they been stolen by the Russian intelligence services andsent to WikiLeaks. If so, Russia made use of Assange and WikiLeaksto exploit selected fruits of its espionage activitiesGreenwald and Poitras also released belated documents. OnJuly 15, 2015, their web publication, The Intercept, released aSnowden document that cited an NSA intercept of an Israeli militarycommunication concerning an Israeli raid in Syria on August 1,Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1839/29/16 5:51 PM184 | how america lost its secrets2008. It revealed that a group of Israeli commandos killed GeneralMuhammad Suleiman, a top aide to President Bashar al- Assadwho had been working with North Korea to build a nuclear facilityin Syria. Israel had destroyed that facility in Operation Orchardnearly a year earlier. Whatever the purpose of this new release of anNSA document (which had little if anything to do with any of theNSA’s own operations), it was not among the data that Snowden hadgiven Poitras and Greenwald in Hong Kong in 2013, according to asource with access to the investigation. Next, on January 28, 2016,The Intercept published data taken from a GHCQ (the British cipherservice) file furnished by Snowden revealing military intelligenceactivities abroad. Specifically, it disclosed that the United States andBritain were intercepting data from Israel’s military drones in 2008.British intelligence had determined in 2013 that the material sentto Greenwald via a courier did not contain such GCHQ documents.If that is the case, then Poitras and Greenwald, like Appelbaum andAssange, were still receiving NSA documents that Snowden hadallegedly stolen a long time after he went to Russia and claimed hehad destroyed all his files.The NSA reportedly determined that these belated documents,most of which concerned American allies in Germany, France, andIsrael, had been among the material copied during the Snowdenbreach. They provided further reason to believe that someone stillhad access to the documents that were not distributed to journalistsin Hong Kong. Kucherena’s disclosure, just before the first post–Hong Kong release, that Snowden still had access to the NSA filesmade it appear plausible that Snowden sent these documents to DerSpiegel, WikiLeaks, and The Intercept.A former high- ranking KGB officer I interviewed had a very differentview. He told me that in his experience an intelligence defectorto Russia would not be allowed to distribute secret material tojournalists without explicit approval by the security service tendinghim. He added that this injunction would be especially true inthe case of Snowden because Putin had publicly enjoined him fromreleasing U.S. intelligence data. The more plausible alternative wasthat this material was released at the behest of the Russian intelligenceservice.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1849/29/16 5:51 PMThe Keys to the Kingdom Are Missing | 185The mystery of the post– Hong Kong documents also intriguedmembers of the U.S. intelligence community with whom I discussedit. When I asked a former intelligence executive about the ultimatesource for the Merkel story, he responded, “If Snowden didn’t givejournalists this document in Hong Kong, we can assume an intermediaryfed it to Appelbaum to publish in Der Spiegel.” Accordingto him, the NSA investigation had determined that Snowden indeedhad copied an NSA list of the cell phone numbers of foreign leaders,including the number of Merkel. This list became the basis of theDer Spiegel story.It was also clear that Snowden gave credence to the release in Moscow.He made a major point about the hacking of Merkel’s phonein an interview with Wired in 2014. Just about two weeks beforethe leak, Kucherena said Snowden still had access to the documents.Clearly, someone had access. But whoever was behind it, the releaseof information about the alleged bugging of Merkel’s phone resultedin badly fraying U.S. relations with Germany in the midst of developingtroubles in Ukraine. As it later turned out, according to theinvestigation of the German federal prosecutor, which concluded in2015, there was no evidence found in this document, or elsewhere,that Merkel’s calls were ever actually intercepted. Although theyrevealed little if anything that the intelligence services of Germany,France, and Israel were not already aware of, they raised a publicoutcry in allies against NSA surveillance, and the outcry became theevent itself.While these post– Hong Kong documents had little if any intelligencevalue, they provided further evidence that at least part ofthe stolen NSA documents was in the hands of a party hostile to theUnited States. If so, it wasn’t much of a leap to assume that this partyalso had access to the far more valuable Level 3 documents revealingthe NSA’s sources and methods, such as the one that Ledgett haddescribed as a “roadmap” to U.S. electronic espionage against Russiaand China.Within the intelligence community, this concern was heightenedby new countermeasures to this espionage employed by Russia andChina after Snowden reached Moscow. For example, there wereindications that the NSA had lost part of its capabilities to followEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1859/29/16 5:51 PM186 | how america lost its secretsRussian troop movements in the Crimea and eastern Ukraine. U.S.intelligence officials even went so far as to suggest, according to areport in The Wall Street Journal, that “Russian planners mighthave gotten a jump on the West by evading U.S. eavesdropping.”Britain also discovered that some of its secret operations had beencompromised after Snowden went to Moscow. According to a 2015story in the Sunday Times of London, British intelligence had determinedthat Britain’s intelligence- gathering sources had been exposedto adversary services by documents that Snowden had stolen fromthe NSA in 2013. These documents had been provided to the NSAby the GCHQ. Unless such intelligence disasters were freak aberrations,it appeared to confirm General Alexander’s warning in 2014that the NSA was “losing some of its capabilities, because they’rebeing disclosed to our adversaries.”Snowden’s supporters disputed this view. If only as an act of faithin Snowden’s personal integrity, they continued to believe his avowalto Senator Humphrey that he had acted to protect U.S. secrets byshielding them from adversary intelligence services after he tookthem abroad. They also continued to take him at his word when hesaid he had destroyed all the NSA documents before going to Russia.Despite such protestations of patriotic loyalty, U.S. intelligenceofficials could not so easily dismiss the possibility that the missingdocuments still existed. After all, a U.S. intelligence worker who isdedicated to protecting America’s secrets from its adversaries doesnot ordinarily steal them.The NSA, the CIA, and the Department of Defense thereforehad little choice but to assume the worst had happened: Russia andChina had obtained access to the “keys to the kingdom.” Whateverthe extent of the actual damage, it was up to Alexander’s replacement,Admiral Michael Rogers, both to restore morale and to rebuildthe capabilities of America’s electronic intelligence in the wake ofthe massive breach. According to a national security staff memberin the Obama White House, that job would take more than a decade.The NSA had failed to protect vital assets. This intelligence failuredid not happen out of the blue.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1869/29/16 5:51 PMc h a p t e r 18The Unheeded WarningThe NSA— the world’s most capable signals intelligence organization,an agency immensely skilled in stealing digital data— hadhad its pockets thoroughly picked.— cia deputy director michael morell, 2015In april 2010, the CIA received a stark reminder of the ongoingnature of Russian espionage. It came in the form of a messagefrom one of its best- placed moles in the Russian intelligence service.This surreptitious source was Alexander Poteyev, a fifty- four- yearoldcolonel in the SVR, which was the successor agency to the firstchief directorate of the KGB. While the FSB took over the KGB’sdomestic role in 1991, the SVR became Russia’s foreign intelligenceservice. Its operation center was in the Yasenevo district of Moscow.The CIA had recruited Poteyev as a mole in the 1990s when he hadbeen stationed at the Russian embassy in Washington, D.C. That itcould sustain a mole in Moscow for over a decade attested to its capabilitiesin the espionage business. After he returned to Moscow, stillsecretly on the CIA’s payroll, he became the deputy chief of the SVR’s“American” section. This unit of Russian intelligence had the primaryresponsibility for establishing spies in the CIA, the FBI, theNSA, and other American intelligence agencies.The SVR’s last known (or caught) mole in U.S. intelligence wasEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1879/29/16 5:51 PM188 | how america lost its secretsthe CIA officer Harold Nicholson, in 1996. Before it could expand itsespionage capabilities, it needed to build a network of Russian agentsin the United States. For this network, it needed to groom so- calledillegals, or agents who were not connected to the Russian embassy.This so- called illegals network was necessary because presumablyall Russian diplomats, including the so- called legal members of Russianintelligence, were under constant surveillance by the FBI.Advances in surveillance technology in the twenty- first centurymade it increasingly difficult to communicate with recruits throughits diplomatic missions. To evade it, the “American” division of theSVR was given the task of placing individuals in the United Statesdisguised as ordinary Americans. Their “legend,” or operationalcover, could be thin because they would not be applying for jobs inthe government. Their job was simply to blend in with their communityuntil they were called upon by the “American” departmentin Moscow to service a mole who had been planted in U.S. intelligenceor other parts of the U.S. government. Until they were activatedby such a call, they were classified as sleeper agents. Unlike theSVR’s “legal” officers, who were attached to Russian embassies asdiplomats and were protected from arrest by the Treaty of Vienna,the SVR’s illegal agents lack diplomatic immunity. According toPavel Sudoplatov, who defected from the KGB in the Cold War, thesole job of such sleeper agents was to “live under cover in the Westawaiting assignments for the Center.” One assignment that justifiesthe expense of maintaining such agents is to service a penetration,after one is made, in the U.S. intelligence establishment. While waitingto be activated for such a job, sleeper agents were instructed tobuild every detail of their cover identity so as to perfectly blend inwith Americans.To build this American network of sleeper agents took the betterpart of a decade. In 2005, the SVR’s “American” section in Moscowhad begun methodically installing them in the United States.Almost all were Russian citizens who had assumed new identities tobetter blend into their communities.The CIA learned of this sleeper program through Poteyev soonafter it began. The issue was how to exploit this knowledge. When Iwas writing my book on international deception, James Jesus Angle-Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1889/29/16 5:51 PMThe Unheeded Warning | 189ton had pointed out to me that “the business of intelligence servicesrequires understanding precisely the relationship of their oppositionto them.” His view, though his opponents inside the CIA wouldcall it with some justification an obsession, was that an intelligenceservice had to focus on the moves of its rivals. To accomplish this“business” in the first decade of the twenty- first century, the CIAhad to establish why its new opposition, the SVR, was laying thefoundation for an espionage operation. What were its priorities inthe resumption of the intelligence war? Its inside man in the SVR,Poteyev, provided it with a tremendous advantage in this relationship.He knew the links in a sleeper network that the SVR believedwas safely hidden from surveillance. If they were followed, whenthey were activated, they could expose whatever recruits the SVRhad in the American government. The CIA duly shared this informationabout the sleeper ring with the FBI, which had the responsibilityfor the surveillance of foreign agents in the United States.The FBI, for its part, kept the Russian sleeper agents under tightsurveillance— an operation that grew in complexity and expense asmore SVR agents arrived in the United States.Meanwhile, in Moscow, Poteyev was following the unfoldingoperation. Part of his SVR job was to continue preparing these“Americans,” as they were called by the SVR, for their assignments.Some had been sent as couples, others as singles. One of the singlesthat Poteyev personally handled was Anna Kushchyenko. Shewas a strikingly beautiful Russian student who changed her nameto Anna Chapman by briefly marrying a British citizen she met ata rave party. After taking his name, she left him. After completingher training in Russia, she was sent by the SVR to New York Cityto establish herself as an international real estate specialist. Other“Americans” under Poteyev’s watch became travel agents, students,and financial advisers. In all, Poteyev identified to the CIA twelvesuch sleeper agents. The cost of FBI surveillance of them over theyears became sizable. According to a former FBI agent, around- theclocksurveillance on the movements and communications of a singleindividual can cost over $10,000 a day.When the CIA received Poteyev’s message in 2010 warning thatRussian military intelligence had asked the SVR to activate some ofEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1899/29/16 5:51 PM190 | how america lost its secretsits sleeper agents for a highly sensitive assignment, that suggestedRussian intelligence had found a possible source who could supplyit with valuable information. According to a former CIA intelligenceofficial who later became involved in the case, the assignmentinvolved preparing these agents to service a potential source in theNSA at Fort Meade, Maryland. If true, it suggested that Russianintelligence either had found or was working on a means of penetratingthe NSA.In 2010, the NSA division that handled such security and espionagethreats reportedly initiated a counterespionage probe at theNSA’s Fort Meade headquarters. According to a former NSA official,“They [were] looking for one or more Russian spies that NSA [was]convinced resided at Fort Meade and possibly other DoD Intel offices,like DIA.” Because the NSA’s cryptological service had in 2010thirty- five thousand military and civilian contractor employees, thesearch for a possible leak was no easy matter. According to a subsequentnote in the NSA’s secret budget report to Congress, it wouldrequire “a minimum of 4,000 periodic investigations of employeesin position to compromise sensitive information” to safely guardagainst “insider threats by trusted insiders who seek to exploit theirauthorized access to sensitive information to harm U.S. interests.”According to a former executive in the intelligence community,that amount of investigation far exceeded the budgetary capabilitiesof the NSA. So while the investigation found no evidence ofSVR recruitment, it remained possible that Russian intelligence hadfound a candidate in the NSA.Meanwhile, in June 2010, to preempt such a leak in U.S. intelligenceand avoid any potential embarrassment that could result, theFBI decided it could no longer engage in this sort of an intelligencegame with the sleeper network. It arrested all twelve sleeper agentsidentified by Poteyev. After receiving a great deal of public attention(which led to their inspiring the FX series The Americans), thesleeper agents were deported to Russia. This move had both advantagesand disadvantages. The main advantage was that it severed anycommunication link between the putative person of interest in theNSA and Russian intelligence via the sleeper agents. The main disadvantagewas that it eliminated the possibility that FBI surveillanceEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1909/29/16 5:51 PMThe Unheeded Warning | 191of the illegals might lead the FBI to a possible recruit in the NSA orelsewhere.The preemptive arrests also had an unforeseen consequence.They resulted in accidently compromising Poteyev. When Chapmanreturned to Moscow after a spy exchange, she was taken toa well- publicized dinner with Putin. Afterward, she informed herdebriefer at the SVR that only Poteyev had been in a position toknow the password that an FBI agent had used to try to deceiveher into believing she was speaking to an SVR officer. This broughtPoteyev under immediate suspicion. Tipped off by the CIA to theFBI’s error, Poteyev managed to escape by taking a train from Moscowto Belarus, where the CIA exfiltrated him to the United States.Poteyev had been saved from prison— or worse— but he was no longeruseful to the CIA as a mole. Without the services of Poteyev inthe SVR in Moscow, U.S. intelligence was unable to find out furtherdetails about the mission to which Poteyev’s sleeper agents were tobe assigned. All it had discovered was the history of the preparationsfor a major espionage revival. It now knew that the SVR hadinstalled plumbing in America and that one or more agents in thisnetwork had been activated to handle a possible recruit in the NSA.But without anyone left in the sleeper network to follow and withoutan inside source in the SVR, it had no further avenues to fruitfullypursue. The revelation of the sleeper agents had little if anyother intelligence value.The NSA’s own security investigation turned up no evidence of aleak at Fort Meade in 2010. That of course doesn’t mean there hadn’tbeen one. The Russian intelligence service had demonstrated in thepast that it was well schooled in covering its tracks in operationsagainst U.S. communications intelligence. For example, CIA counterintelligencehad learned from a KGB defector in the early 1960sthat Russian intelligence had penetrated the cipher room at the U.S.embassy in Moscow and, because of this operation, the KGB was ableto decipher crucial communications. Even so, it failed to find eitherthe perpetrator or any evidence of his existence for more than halfa century. The operation was only definitively revealed by the Russianspymaster Sergey Kondrashev in 2007. Tennent Bagley, whoheaded the CIA’s Soviet bloc counterintelligence at the time, latelyEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1919/29/16 5:51 PM192 | how america lost its secretswrote in his book that the ability of Russian intelligence to concealthis penetration for more than half a century “broke the record forsecret keeping.”This Russian ability to penetrate U.S. intelligence was not entirelydefeated by America’s implementation of more sophisticated securityprocedures, such as the polygraph examination and extensivebackground checks. In 1995, eleven years before Snowden joined it,the CIA’s inspector general completed a study of the KGB’s use offalse defectors to mislead the U.S. government from the end of theCold War in the late 1980s through the mid- 1990s. It found Russiahad dispatched at least half a dozen double agents who providedmisleading information to their CIA case officers.Because the KGB operation went undetected for nearly a decade,the disinformation prepared in Moscow had been incorporated intoreports (which had a distinctive blue stripe to signify their importance)that had been provided to Ronald Reagan, George H. W. Bush,and Bill Clinton. Even more shocking, in tracing the path of thisdisinformation, the inspector general found that the “senior CIAofficers responsible for these reports had known that some of theirsources for this information were controlled by Russian intelligence,”yet they did not inform the president and officials receivingthe blue- striped reports that they included Russian misinformation.What the CIA director John Deutch called “an inexcusable lapse”also reflected a form of institutional willful blindness in U.S. intelligence,borne out of a bureaucratic fear of career embarrassment sowell described in Le Carré’s spy novels. Detecting intelligence failureshas, if anything, become even more difficult in the age of theanonymous Internet.The Snowden breach demonstrated the NSA had few if any failsafedefenses against would- be leakers of communications intelligence.In the new domain of cyber warfare, conventional defensiverules do not apply. “There are no rivers or hills up here. It’s all flat.All advantage goes to the attacker,” General Hayden said in an interviewin 2015 with the publisher of The Wall Street Journal. His pointwas that because there are no defensive positions, the United Statesin cyber warfare must rely on an aggressive offensive. If fully successful,such an offensive would so deeply penetrate the defenses ofEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1929/29/16 5:51 PMThe Unheeded Warning | 193an adversary’s intelligence organization that it could not mount anyof its own surprise cyber attacks. It would also make it difficult if notimpossible for adversary services to recruit a spy in the NSA. Forexample, the CIA penetration of the SVR in 2010 prevented it fromusing its sleeper network against U.S. targets. “The best defensein this game may be an overwhelming offensive,” a former intelligenceofficial said to me. “But that strategy only works if we cankeep secret sensitive sources.”Central to this offensive strategy was the NSA’s National ThreatOperations Center in Oahu. It employed threat analysts to surreptitiouslymonitor the secret activities of potential enemies, mainlyChina, Russia, and North Korea. A large part of their job was tomake transparent to the United States the hostile activities of theRussian and Chinese services so that they posed little if any intelligencethreat to America. This strategy worked so long as the NSAguarded itself, but it also raised the issue, as the Roman Juvenalfamously warned, “Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?” (Who will guardthe guards themselves?)Less than three years after the NSA had received the Poteyevwarning, instead of guarding secrets, Snowden stole them. Despiteall the measures the NSA had taken to protect its vital secrets, alowly civilian employee had walked away with the lists of secretNSA sources in China and Russia and then gone first to China andthen to Russia. In the hands of their intelligence services, these stolenlists had the potential to totally upend the NSA’s offensive strategy.Because Russia and China have an intelligence treaty for sharingsuch spoils between them when it is to their mutual advantage, ithad to be assumed that if either country had acquired the secretsfrom Snowden, they would be shared between them, altering thebalance of power between the communications intelligence servicesof the United States and its adversaries.Following the Snowden breach, both China and Russia hadimmense successes in breaking through the defenses of U.S. governmentnetworks, including the reported breaches in 2014 and 2015 ofU.S. personnel files and background checks. When I asked GeneralHayden in June 2015 if these successes were made easier by thosedocuments compromised by Snowden, he replied, “Even though IEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1939/29/16 5:51 PM194 | how america lost its secretscannot make a direct correlation here, unarguably our adversariesknow far more about how we collect signals intelligence than theyever did before [Snowden].”If Snowden could cause such massive damage, so could other civiliantrainees at the NSA. Someone in the chain of command had totake responsibility. General Alexander tendered his resignation onJune 30, 2013. “I’m the director,” he said, falling on his sword. “Ultimately,I’m accountable.” Because President Obama did not wantthe head of the NSA resigning in the midst of the Snowden crisis,he asked him to stay on for another six months. He then appointedRogers to be his replacement. Meanwhile, it had become undeniablyclear to the review committee appointed by President Obama in2013 that the NSA’s own defenses had catastrophically failed. If so,this change was the equivalent of rearranging the deck chairs on theTitanic after it hit the iceberg.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1949/29/16 5:51 PMpart threeTHE GAME OF NATIONSI learned that just beneath the surface there’s another world,and still different worlds as you dig deeper.—david lynch, on his 1986 film, Blue VelvetEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 1959/30/16 8:13 AMEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 1969/30/16 8:13 AMc h a p t e r 19The Rise of the NSAThere are many things we do in intelligence that, if revealed,would have the potential for all kinds of blowback.— james clapper, director of national intelligence, 2013In the game of nations, which often is not visible to publicscrutiny, the great prize is state secrets that reveal the hiddenweaknesses of a nation’s potential adversaries. The most importantof these in peacetime is communication intercepts. It was justsuch state secrets that Edward Snowden took from the NSA in thespring of 2013. Before that breach, America’s paramount advantagein this subterranean competition was its undisputed dominance inthe business of obtaining and deciphering the communications ofother nations. The NSA was the instrument by which the UnitedStates both protected its own secret communications and stole thesecrets of foreign nations. The NSA, however, has an Achilles’s heel:It is dependent on civilian computer technicians who do not necessarilyshare its values to operate its complex system. Because of thisdependence, it was not able in 2013, as it turned out, to protect itscrucial sources and methods.Snowden exposed this vulnerability when he walked away withthe aforementioned descriptions of the gaps in America’s coverageEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 1979/30/16 8:13 AM198 | how america lost its secretsof the communications of its adversaries. Even though the Cold Warhad been declared over after the collapse of the Soviet Union a quarterof a century earlier, the age- old enterprise of espionage did notend with it. Russia and China still sought to blunt the edge that theNSA gave the United States. The Snowden breach therefore needs tobe considered in the context of the once and future intelligence war.The modern enterprise of reading the communications of othernations traces back in the United States to military code- breakingefforts preceding America’s entry into World War I. The inventionof the radio at the end of the nineteenth century soon provided themeans of rapidly sending and getting messages from ships, submarines,ground forces, spies, and embassies. These over- the- air messagescould also be intercepted from the ether by adversaries. If theywere to remain secret, they could not be sent in plain text. Theyhad to be sent in either code, in which letters are substituted for oneanother, or, more effectively, a cipher, in which numbers are substitutedfor letters. Making and breaking codes and ciphers becamea crucial enterprise for nations. By 1914, the U.S. Army and Navyhad set up units, staffed by mathematicians, linguists, and crosswordpuzzle solvers, to intercept and decode enemy messages. After thewar had ended in 1918, these units were fused into a cover corporationcalled the Code Compilation Company, which moved to newoffices on Thirty- Seventh Street and Madison Avenue in New YorkCity.Under the supervision of the famous cryptographer Herbert O.Yardley, a team of twenty code breakers was employed in what wascalled the Black Chamber. Yardley arranged for Western Union,which had the telegraph monopoly in America, to provide the BlackChamber with all the telegrams coming into the United States. “Itsfar- seeking eyes penetrate the secret conference chambers at Washington,Tokyo, London, Paris, Geneva, Rome,” Yardley wrote aboutthe Black Chamber. “Its sensitive ears catch the faintest whisperingin the foreign capitals of the world.” But in 1929, at the instructionsof President Herbert Hoover, Secretary of State Henry Stimsonclosed the Black Chamber, saying famously, “Gentlemen should notread each other’s mail.”The moratorium did not last long. With war looming in Asia andEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 1989/30/16 8:13 AMThe Rise of the NSA | 199Europe, President Franklin D. Roosevelt reactivated the operationas the Signal Security Agency. It proved its value in breaking theJapanese machine- generated cipher “Purple.” In June 1942, usingdeciphered Japanese messages to pinpoint the location of the Japanesefleet at Midway, America won a decisive naval victory in thePacific. Germany’s Enigma encoding machines, with three encodingwheels, proved more of a challenge. Initially, British cryptanalystsled by the brilliant mathematician Alan Turing succeeded in buildinga rudimentary computer to decipher Germany’s messages to itssubmarines and bombers, but in 1942 Germany added a fourth set ofencoding wheels, escalating what was essentially a battle of machineintelligence. The U.S. Navy then contracted with the National CashRegister Company to build a computing machine capable of breakingthe improved Enigma, and in May 1943 it succeeded.By the time the war ended in 1945, the United States had overone hundred giant decryption machines in operation. This unrivaledcapability to read the communications of foreign nations, whichremained one of America’s most closely guarded secrets, was transferredto the Army Security Agency based at Fort Meade, Maryland.Then, on October 24, 1952, President Harry S. Truman greatlyexpanded its purview and changed its name to the National SecurityAgency.The NSA was given two missions. The first one was protectingthe communications of the U.S. government. The main risk was thatthe Soviets would find a way of breaching U.S. government channelsof communications. The second mission was intercepting all therelevant communications and signals of foreign governments. Thislatter mandate included the governments of allies as well as enemies.The president, the other intelligence services, and the Departmentof Defense deemed what was relevant for national security. Eventhough the NSA remained part of the Department of Defense, itsjob went far beyond providing military intelligence. It also acted asa service agency to other American intelligence services. They preparedshopping lists of foreign communications intelligence targetsfor the NSA to pursue.As the Cold War heated up in the 1960s, the NSA provided intelligencenot only to the Pentagon but to the Department of State, theEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 1999/30/16 8:13 AM200 | how america lost its secretsCentral Intelligence Agency, the Treasury Department, the AtomicEnergy Commission, and the FBI. With a multibillion- dollar “blackbudget” hidden from public scrutiny, the NSA’s technology directorateinvested in state- of- the- art equipment, including supercomputersthat could break almost any cipher, antennas mounted on geosynchronoussatellites that vacuumed in billions of foreign telephonecalls, and other exotic capabilities. It also devised stealthy means ofbreaking into channels that its adversaries believed were secure. Thisenterprise required not only an army of technical specialists capableof remotely intercepting even the faintest traces of electromagneticsignals, hacking into computers, and eavesdropping on distant conversationsbut also special units called “tailored access operations,”to plant listening devices in embassies and diplomatic pouches. TheNSA also organized elaborate expeditions to give access to or evenpenetrate physical cables in enemy territory. In 1971, for example,the NSA sent a specially equipped submarine into Russia’s Sea ofOkhotsk in Asia to tap through Arctic ice. The target was a Russiancable four hundred feet below the surface that connected the Russiannaval headquarters in Vladivostok with a missile testing range.In 1980, President Ronald Reagan gave the NSA a clear mandateto expand its interception of foreign communications. In ExecutiveOrder 12333, he told the NSA that “all means, consistent with applicableFederal law and this [Executive] order, and with full considerationof the rights of United States persons, shall be used to obtainreliable intelligence information to protect the United States and itsinterests.” It did not restrict any foreign country, either an adversaryor an ally, from its surveillance.The NSA’s target soon became nothing short of the entire electromagneticspectrum. “We are approaching a time when we willbe able to survey almost any point on the earth’s surface with somesensor,” Admiral Stansfield Turner, the former director of centralintelligence, wrote in 1985. “We should soon be able to keep trackof most of the activities on the surface of the earth.” Bobby RayInman, a former director of the NSA and deputy director of the CIA,argued that the “vastness of the [American] intelligence ‘take’ fromthe Soviet Union, and the pattern of continuity going back years,Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2009/30/16 8:13 AMThe Rise of the NSA | 201even decades,” greatly diminished the possibility of Soviet deceptionso long as the NSA kept secret its sources.The NSA did not rely entirely on its own sensors for this globalsurveillance. It also formed intelligence- sharing alliances with keyallies. The most important was with the British code- breaking service,GCHQ, which had achieved enormous success in World War IIin using computers to crack the German Enigma cipher. This allianceexpanded to include Canada, Australia, and New Zealand in the socalledFive Eyes Alliance. Because over 80 percent of internationalphone calls and Internet traffic passed through fiber- optic cables inthese five countries, the alliance had the capability of monitoringalmost all phone and Internet communications.The NSA also established fruitful liaisons with the cyber servicesof Germany, France, Spain, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Israel,Japan, and South Korea, which were often willing to provide theNSA with access to telecommunications links in their countries.These long- term allies greatly strengthened the NSA’s hand in otherways in the intelligence war. For example, the so- called James Bondprovision of the British Intelligence Services Act of 1994 allowedofficers of the GCHQ to commit illegal acts outside Britain, includingplanting devices to intercept data from computer servers, cellphones, and other electronic targets. And, as Snowden’s release ofdocuments revealed in 2013 and 2014, these foreign allies fullyshared their information with the NSA.Of course, the liaison between the NSA and its allies was a twowaystreet. In 2013, none of these other countries had a global networkof geosynchronous sensors in outer space and under the oceanthat could monitor signals from missile launching, submarines,military deployments, nuclear tests, and other matters of strategicimportance to them. Nor did these allies have the cipher- breakingcapabilities of the array of NSA supercomputers. The NSA hadassiduously built these means at a cost of over half a trillion dollarsand employed tens of thousands of linguists who could translatealmost any dialect or language of interest.Even though these allies had their own cipher services and localcapabilities, they depended on the NSA to provide them with a largeEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2019/30/16 8:13 AM202 | how america lost its secretsshare of their signals intelligence. From the perspective of defendingthemselves from potential threats, the deal that these allies had withthe NSA was mutually advantageous.The NSA’s overseas intelligence gathering was not limited toadversary nations. With the exception of the Five Eyes allies, itgathered data that was deemed important by the president and theDefense Department in friendly countries. These operations hadbeen approved by every American president and funded by everyAmerican Congress since 1941. After all, even in the realm of allies,activities take place that run counter to American interests. The 9/11conspiracy, for example, was hatched in Hamburg, Germany, andfinanced in Dubai and Saudi Arabia.Nor were American allies unaware of the reach of the NSA. “Yes,my continental European friends, we have spied on you. And it istrue we use computers to sort through data by using keywords,”the former CIA director James Woolsey wrote in The Wall StreetJournal in 2000. “Have you stopped to ask yourselves what we arelooking for?” Whether or not it was appreciated by other countries,the global harvesting of communications intelligence by the NSAwas hardly a secret.As the NSA expanded further, it delegated part of its work toregional bases, including ones in Utah, Texas, Hawaii, and Japan. Theparamount task of the NSA remained monitoring the channels ofcommunications that an adversary might use. The vast proliferationof these channels in cyberspace, which included e- mail, socialmedia, document sharing, and other innovations of the Internet age,greatly complicated this task. Even so, this challenge was not insurmountable,because most of the Internet actually traveled throughfiberglass landline cables that crossed the territories of the UnitedStates, Britain, and Australia. So the NSA found the technical means,including voluntarily gaining access to major Internet companies, to“harvest” vast amounts of this Internet data. America’s other intelligenceagencies quickly recognized the value of the communicationsintelligence gleaned from foreign telecommunications. John E.McLaughlin, who was the CIA’s acting director in 2004, describedthe NSA as nothing less than the “very foundation of U.S. intelligence.”It served as a “foundation” for the CIA because interceptedEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2029/30/16 8:13 AMThe Rise of the NSA | 203communications intelligence allowed the CIA (and other U.S. intelligenceservices) to test and verify the reports of their human sourcesin foreign countries. Moreover, because of the immense amount offoreign data that the NSA vacuumed in through its global sensors,it provided the CIA with an effective means for discovering newtargets in adversary nations.By the first decade of this century, the NSA’s surreptitious effortsto render the Internet transparent to U.S. intelligence had earned ita new set of enemies. They were the previously mentioned hacktivistswho were attempting to shield the activities of Internet usersfrom the intrusions of government surveillance. They employedboth encryption and Tor software to defeat that surveillance. But theNSA did not conceal that it was intent on countering any attempt tointerfere with its surveillance of the Internet. It built back doors intoencryption and worked to unravel the Tor scrambling of IP addresses.It made leading hacktivists targets. Brian Hale, the spokesman forthe director of national intelligence, disclosed that the United Statesroutinely intercepted the cyber signatures of parties suspected ofhacking into U.S. government networks.Following the 9/11 attacks on the Pentagon and the World TradeCenter, the surveillance of the Internet became an integral part ofthe Bush administration’s war on terrorism. In October 2001, Congressexpanded the NSA’s mandate by passing the USA Patriot Act.As I described earlier, Section 215 of the act directly authorizedthe NSA, with the approval of the FISA court, to collect and storedomestic telephone billing records. The idea was to better coordinatedomestic and foreign intelligence about al- Qaeda and other jihadistgroups. This put the NSA directly in the anti- terrorist business.It also necessitated the NSA vastly increasing its coverage of theInternet.The mantra in government in this post- 9/11 intelligence worldbecame “connect the dots.” Congress through this act essentiallydemolished the wall between domestic and foreign intelligencewhen any NSA activity related to foreign- directed terrorism. It furthermade the NSA a partner with the FBI in tracking phone callsEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2039/30/16 8:13 AM204 | how america lost its secretsmade from phones originating outside the United States by knownforeign jihadists. If these calls were made to individuals inside, theNSA was now authorized to retrieve the billing records of the personcalled and those people whom he or she called. These traces werethen supplied to the FBI. The new duties also increased the NSA’sneed to create new bureaucratic mechanisms to monitor its compliancewith FISA court orders. Rajesh De, the NSA’s general counsel atthe time of the Snowden breach, described the NSA as becoming by2013 “one of the most regulated enterprises in the world.” Graftedonto its intelligence activities were layers of mandated reporting tooversight officials. Not only did the NSA have its own chief complianceofficer, chief privacy and civil liberties officer, and independentinspector general, but the NSA also had to report to a different setof compliance officers at the Department of Defense, the Office ofthe Director of National Intelligence, and the Department of Justice.Additionally, the Department of Justice dispatched a team of lawyersevery sixty days to review the results of “every single tasking decision”approved by the FISA court.According to De, just assembling these reports involved thousandsof hours of manpower. In addition, the president’s Oversight Boardrequired that the NSA’s Office of the General Counsel and inspectorgeneral supply it every ninety days with a list of every singleerror and deviation from procedure made by every NSA employeeanywhere in the world, including even minor typing errors. Theserequirements, according to De, inundated a large part of the NSAlegal and executive staff in a sea of red tape. Yet this regulation couldnot undo surveillance programs such as the one Snowden revealedof Verizon’s turning over the billing records of its customers to theNSA, because the NSA was in compliance with the FISA court order(even though, as it turned out in 2015, the FISA court might haveerred in interpreting the law).The NSA’s focus on surveillance might have led to the neglect ofits other mission: protecting the integrity of the channels throughwhich the White House, government agencies, and military unitssend information. This task had been made vastly more difficultby the proliferation of computer networks, texting, and e- mails.To protect government networks from cyber attacks, the Penta-Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2049/30/16 8:13 AMThe Rise of the NSA | 205gon belatedly created the U.S. Cyber Command in 2009. In it, thecyber- defense units of the army, navy, marines, and air force cyberforces were merged together and put under the command of theNSA director. General Keith Alexander became the first directorof this new command. One problem for the Cyber Command wasseparating attacks by civilians, including criminals, hacktivists, andanarchists, from cyber warfare sponsored and supported by adversarystates. Because foreign intelligence services often closely imitatedthe tools of civilian hackers, and were even known to providethem with hacking tools, it was not easy for the Cyber Commandto unambiguously determine if the ultimate perpetrator of a cyberattack was state sponsored. For example, the identification of NorthKorea as the principal actor behind the attack on Sony in December2014 appeared to be a rare success, but many cyber- security expertsbelieved that it might be a false trail used to hide the real attacker.Clues could be fabricated in cyberspace to point to the wrong party.The job of the Cyber Command was to prevent such an attack. Tothis end, it planted viruses on hundreds of thousands of computersin private hands to act as sentinels to spot other suspicious virusesthat could mount such an attack. Private computers had becomea new battleground in the cyber wars. It also built a capability toretaliate. Still, cyber attacks, which were launched through layers ofother countries’ computers, could not be unambiguously traced backto the true perpetrator.This escalation by the Cyber Command set the stage for expandedforms of warfare in cyberspace. “The Chinese are viewed as thesource of a great many attacks on western infrastructure and justrecently, the U.S. electrical grid,” General Alexander said in explainingthe need for this consolidation. “If that is determined to be anorganized attack, I would want to go and take down the source ofthose attacks.” The same retaliation would presumably be usedagainst Russia, Iran, or any other adversary. Dominance of cyberspaceitself now became part of the NSA’s mandate.Even so, the most important job of the NSA remained interceptingsecret information from Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea.To this end, it had an annual budget of $12.3 billion and some thirtyfivethousand military and civilian employees. In 2013, James Clap-Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2059/30/16 8:13 AM206 | how america lost its secretsper, director of national intelligence, justified the secret intelligencebudget by saying in an open session of Congress, “We are bolsteringour support for clandestine SIGINT [signals intelligence] capabilitiesto collect against high priority targets, including foreign leadershiptargets,” and to develop “groundbreaking cryptanalytic capabilitiesto defeat adversarial cryptography and exploit Internet traffic.” Itwas no secret to Congress, even before Snowden, that the NSA wasattempting to monitor the Internet. What was a closely held secretbefore Snowden revealed it was that the NSA had found a way in2007 to intercept Internet traffic before it was encrypted.Through all this tumult, the heart of the NSA’s activity remainedits five- thousand- acre base at Fort Meade, Maryland. It commandedthe most powerful mechanism for intercepting communications thatthe world had ever seen. No other country came close to its technologyfor intercepting information. The NSA not only was able tointercept secret information from potential adversaries but also— atleast until the Snowden breach— managed to conceal these meansfrom them. As long as these adversaries remained blind to the waysin which their communications were being intercepted, deciphered,and read by the NSA, they could not take effective countermeasures.Consequently, the NSA had the capability to provide the presidentand his advisers with continuous insights into the thinking andplanning of potential enemies.Keeping its sources and methods secret was no easy task. TheNSA’s technicians had to deal with continuous technical challengesto provide a seamless harvesting of data from a wide range of communicationdevices, including telephones, computers, and the Internet.It required continuous intra- agency communications betweenthe NSA’s own intelligence officers and a growing number of civiliantechnicians. It even had its own “Wiki- style” network through whichthey could discuss problems, called the NSANet. Because it couldnot tightly control access to this technical network, it expunged anymention of the sources and methods from the material circulated onthe classified NSA network. Instead, it stored them in discrete computers,called compartments, which were disconnected from othercomputers at the NSA. These compartments could only be accessedby a limited number of analysts and NSA executives who had a needEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2069/30/16 8:13 AMThe Rise of the NSA | 207to know about the data they contained. These compartments werethe final line of defense against an inside intruder.In 2009, Snowden, as we know, found his way into the NSAthrough a temporary job with an outside contractor that was workingfor the NSA’s Technology Directorate to repair and update itsbackup system. Four years later, by maneuvering to get hired byanother outside contractor with access to the NSA’s sources andmethods, he was able to steal secrets stored in isolated computersbearing directly on the ongoing intelligence war. Snowden alsocopied from these compartments in a matter of weeks, as has beenpreviously mentioned, the NSA’s Level 3 sources and methods usedagainst Russia, Iran, and China. The Snowden breach demonstratedthat the NSA’s envelope of secrecy was at best illusory.After this immense loss, the NSA’s sources inside these adversarycountries were largely compromised, even if they were not closeddown. Once these adversaries were in a position to know what channelsthe NSA was intercepting, they could use these same channelsto mislead U.S. intelligence. A former top intelligence official toldme, “The queen on our chessboard had been taken.”The NSA moved to mitigate the damage and find new ways ofobtaining unexpected intelligence. In June 2014, the new NSA director,Rogers, had to confront flagging morale that, according to GeneralHayden, was near paralyzing the intelligence service. Rogersrecognized that as a direct result of the Snowden breach, “the nationhas lost capabilities against adversaries right now who are attemptingto actively undermine us.” But even with that loss, he observed,“the sky has not fallen.”As in the Chicken Little fable he cited, the world had not endedfor the NSA. Nor had it ended for the multibillion- dollar outsourcingenterprise it superintended. The NSA might have lost manyof its sources, or “capabilities,” but Rogers held out hope that newsources could eventually be found to replace them. Compromisedcodes, after all, could be changed. New technological methods couldbe devised. New vulnerabilities could also be targeted in enemy territories.Although repairing the damage might take many “decades,”according to Michael McConnell, the vice- chairman of Booz Allen,the new director had to get on with that task. McConnell, a for-Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2079/30/16 8:13 AM208 | how america lost its secretsmer NSA director himself, pointed out that the NSA director’s “firstresponsibility is to be the chief cheerleader.” Rebuilding the NSAcapabilities assumed, however, that there would not be anotherSnowden- sized breach.The question remained: How could the NSA’s vaunted secrecyhave been so deeply penetrated by a mere analyst in training at aregional base in Oahu? The perpetrator himself could not be asked ifhe was in Moscow pointing to the “incompetence” of the NSA in hisMoscow interviews. What was known, though, was that the youngman who had taken the “queen” from the board had gained entry tothe NSA’s secret chambers through the back door, a portal opened tohim by the NSA’s reliance on outside contractors.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2089/30/16 8:13 AMc h a p t e r 20The NSA’s Back DoorYou have private for- profit companies doing inherently governmentalwork like targeted espionage, surveillance, compromisingforeign systems. And there’s very little oversight, there’s verylittle review.— edward snowden, Moscow, 2014Prior to snowden’s theft of NSA documents, the single mostshattering blow to the confidence of the U.S. intelligence communitywas the 1994 exposure of Aldrich Ames as a long- servingRussian mole in the CIA. Ames, it will be recalled, had been a highrankingCIA officer, working at the CIA’s Counterintelligence CenterAnalysis Group, before he was arrested by the FBI. He had alsoworked as a mole for Russian intelligence.In a plea bargain to avoid a death sentence (he was sentenced tolife imprisonment), he admitted that he had successfully burrowedinto the CIA and had worked there for over nine years on behalf ofthe KGB. His description of his sub- rosa activities as a mole was partof the plea bargain. This stunning revelation shook the CIA leadershipto its core. Until then, CIA executives steadfastly denied that itwas possible that the KGB could sustain a mole in American intelligence.The Ames arrest also led the NSA to reassess its own vulnerabilityto penetration. Could there be an Ames inside the NSA?Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2099/30/16 8:13 AM210 | how america lost its secretsThe question was considered by the NSA’s National Threat OperationsCenter, the same unit from which Edward Snowden laterstole a huge trove of secret documents. According to a report in 1996titled “Out of Control” (later released by the NSA), the danger ofan Ames- type penetration could not be excluded. Even though the“threat officer” who wrote this report was not identified by name,his analysis proved incredibly prescient. He said that the NSA’s driveto enhance its performance by networking its computers wouldresult in the intelligence services’ putting “all their classified information‘eggs’ into one very precarious basket.” The basket was thecomputer networks run by technicians called system administrators.He pointed out that the NSA was becoming increasingly dependenton such networked computer systems, and he predicted that theNSA’s “Aldrich Ames,” as he put it, would be a “system administrator,”which was the position that Edward Snowden held nearly twodecades later at Dell when he began stealing secrets.The NSA’s system administrators were, as the threat officerpointed out, very different from the traditional military employeesat the NSA. They were usually civilians who effectively served asrepairmen for complex computer systems. Moreover, many of themhad not been directly hired by the NSA. Instead, their recruitmenthad been privatized to outside contractors.This outsourcing had deep roots tracing back to World War II. EdBooz and Jim Allen, the founders of Booz Allen Hamilton, obtainedcontracts to help manage ship construction from the U.S. Navy.After the war ended, they sought contracts for their firm in classifiedwork. These contracts grew in size as the NSA needed moreand more system administrators and other information technologiststo manage the computer networks. These system administratorsneeded to be given special privileges to do their service job. Onesuch privilege allowed them to bypass password protection. Anotherprivilege allowed then to temporarily transfer data to an externalstorage device while they repaired computers. These two privilegesgreatly increased the risk of a massive breach. Seeing them as theweak link in the chain, the threat officer wrote in the report that“system administrators are likely to be increasingly targeted by for-Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2109/30/16 8:13 AMThe NSA’s Back Door | 211eign intelligence services because of their special access to information.”Before the computerization of the NSA, the threat officer noted,code clerks and other low- level NSA communicators had been thetargets of adversary intelligence services. But the increasing relianceon computer technicians presented foreign intelligence serviceswith much richer targets. He predicted that they would adapt theirrecruiting to this new reality. Specifically, he argued that adversaryintelligence services would now focus their attention on systemadministrators. “With system administrators,” he said, “the situationis potentially much worse than it has ever been with communicators.”The reason, he explained, was that “system administratorscan so easily, and quickly, steal vast quantities of information.”He further suggested that because system administrators areoften drawn from the counterculture of hacking, they are morelikely to be vulnerable to an adversary service using a fake identityfor its approach, or a “false flag.” A “false flag” was a term originallyapplied to a pirate ship that temporarily hoisted any flag that wouldallow it to gain proximity to its intended prey, but in modern timesit describes a technique employed by espionage services to surreptitiouslylure a prospect. False flags were a staple used by the KGBin espionage recruitment during the Cold War. They were usuallyemployed when a target for recruitment was not ideologically disposedto assisting the intelligence service. To overcome that problem,recruiters hide their true identities and adopt a more sympathetic,bogus one.In 1973, the KGB, working through one of its agents in the U.S.Navy, used the false flag of Israel to recruit Jerry Alfred Whitworth,who served as a communications officer with a top secret clearancefor the navy. Like many other KGB recruits, Whitworth came froma broken family, dropped out of high school, took technical courses,and got a job as a communications officer. He was not disposed toworking for Russia. But he was willing to steal enciphered andplain text cables to help in the defense of Israel. After he was thoroughlycompromised by his espionage work, he was told by the KGBrecruiter that he was actually working for Russia, but by this timeEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2119/30/16 8:13 AM212 | how america lost its secretshe was too deeply compromised to quit. He continued his espionagework for another eight years. (Whitworth, who was arrested by theFBI in 1985, was convicted of espionage and sentenced to 365 yearsin prison.)The Internet provided an almost ideal environment for false flagsbecause its users commonly adopt aliases, screen names, and otheravatars. The threat officer explained how easy it would be for theKGB to adapt such a false flag when dealing with a dissident systemadministrator working for U.S. intelligence. As the threat officerpointed out in his report, the KGB had used false flags in the late1980s to surreptitiously recruit members of the “German HanoverHackers,” a community of anarchistic hackers who breached computernetworks for fun and profit. Until then, these hacktivists stolecorporate and private passwords, credit card information, and otherprivileged documents as a form of freelance espionage. Because oftheir fervent anti- authority ideology, the KGB disguised its recruitersas fellow hacktivists. The KGB succeeded in getting the Hanoverhackers to steal log- in account identifications, source codes, and otherinformation from U.S. government computer networks.The weak link of system administrators became increasingly relevantas the NSA moved further into the digital age. By the beginningof this century, its growing networks of computers were largelyoperated by civilian technicians, including system administrators,infrastructure analysts, and information technologists, who wereneeded to keep the system running. Despite the warning by thethreat officer, the NSA became more and more reliant on these outsidersas it reorganized to meet its new mandates for surveillance ofthe Internet in the war on terrorism.The NSA had to compete with technology companies, such asGoogle, Apple, and Facebook, for the services of experienced ITworkers. Though Booz Allen had been providing technically trainedspecialists to the government since the 1940s and ’50s, congressionallyimposed salary caps put the NSA at a disadvantage to privatefirms in its recruitment efforts. As a result, it increasingly contractedwith private firms to find talent, especially in the rush for data-basedintelligence following 9/11. Booz Allen, to meet increased demand,recruited civilian technicians from many unconventional areas,Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2129/30/16 8:13 AMThe NSA’s Back Door | 213including the hacking culture. Ex- hackers who lacked (or shunned)employment opportunities in the corporate sector were suitablecandidates for the system administrator jobs that these firms hadcontracted to supply the NSA. In the rush to expand, little heed waspaid to the 1996 warning that this hacking culture might providea portal to anti- government hacktivist groups. The NSA becameso enamored with this new computer technology that it neglectedthe security implications of employing outsiders to service it. “Allof us just fell in love with the ease and convenience and scale [ofelectronic storage],” General Hayden, who headed the NSA at thetime, said to The Wall Street Journal in 2015. “So we decided to takethings we used to keep if not in a safe, at least in our desk drawer,and put it up here [in a computer network], where it’s by definitionmore vulnerable.” Making matters even worse, as has previouslybeen discussed, the NSA stripped away much of the so- called stovepipingthat insulated highly sensitive data from the NSA’s othercomputer networks. FBI Director Mueller, in his “Statement Beforethe Senate Committee on Homeland Security and GovernmentalAffairs,”described a decade of post–9/11 intelligence reorganizationthus: “One of the first steps was to centralize control and managementof counterterrorism operations at headquarters to avoid the‘stove-piping’ of information on terrorism cases in the 56 individualfield offices across the country.” Here the NSA was merely followingthe recommendations of the 9/11 Commission to make their datamore accessible to other agencies concerned with potential terroristattacks, but as a result, the inner sanctum of the NSA became moreopen to its new army of civilian technicians.By 2013, much of the job of managing the NSA’s classified computershad been handed over to a handful of private companies: BoozAllen Hamilton, which handled the most highly secret work; DellSecureWorks; Microsoft; Raytheon; and IBM. In many respects,these five companies acted less like management consultants andmore like temporary employment agencies in finding for the NSAthe computer specialists who had the necessary security clearances.The NSA found that the universe of independent contractors wasgoverned by very different considerations from that of intelligenceservices. Unlike intelligence services, their fate depended on turningEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2139/30/16 8:13 AM214 | how america lost its secretsprofits. Because the value of their contracts was largely limited bycompetitive bidding, their business plans were predicated on theirability to minimize the costs of fulfilling these contracts. Their principalcost was the salaries they paid their independent contractors.Their business plans therefore depended on finding large numbersof computer technicians in the private realm willing to work at anNSA base at relatively low wages. This task became more difficult asmany potential recruits could find higher- paying employment withmore of a future in the burgeoning private sphere. But the companiescould also increase their revenue streams by getting additionalcontracts, which, in turn, meant recruiting even more workers.Such a business plan could hardly afford to give the highest priorityto the low probability of a security risk. In the private sector,there is usually an unambiguous external measure of failure. Anautomobile company such as General Motors can measure the performanceof its executives by reckoning its change in net income.With secret intelligence work, the metrics for failure are far lessclear. This curious aspect of secret work was part of the advice givento a White House lawyer in the Obama administration seeking aposition with the NSA in 2012, who was told that among the advantagesof working for a super-secret agency was that if one errs orhas a failure, “it stays secret.” The Snowden case showed that not allfailures stay secret.The NSA can certainly quantify the amount of data it is intercepting,but it obviously cannot count the intelligence that it misses. Thea priori proposition in the intelligence game is that “what is successfullyhidden is never found.” But one failure that cannot be hiddenis a security breach in which a perpetrator uses NSA data to publiclyexpose the NSA’s sources.Until the Snowden breach in 2013, the NSA had experienced onlyone such public failure. It was the capture by North Korea in 1968 ofthe USS Pueblo, which had been carrying out highly sensitive electroniccommunications interception for the NSA. The Pueblo crewfailed to destroy the NSA’s encoding machines, which were flownto Russia several days later. It was a horrible, costly breach. TheSnowden breach was much worse because, among the thousands ofEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2149/30/16 8:13 AMThe NSA’s Back Door | 215documents he stole, he selected lists of the NSA’s secret sources inadversary nations.The Snowden breach was a failure that directly traced back to theNSA’s largest and most trusted contractor, Booz Allen Hamilton,calling into question the vexing issue of privatizing secret intelligence.Booz Allen, like other private firms that did work for the government,was in the business to make money. Indeed, it had foundgovernment contracts so much more profitable than its work inthe private sector that it sold its private sector unit to Price Waterhouse.The profitability of government work led the Carlyle Group’sprivate equity fund to acquire a controlling stake in Booz Allen inJuly 2008. By 2013, it had increased its revenue by more than $1.3billion by expanding its government contracts. Even more impressive,its operating profit on these contracts had doubled. It did notneed to increase its core internal staff to achieve these profits, it justhad to hire outside contractors. In 2008, Booz Allen claimed 20,000employees on its internal staff; in 2013, it claimed fewer than 5,000.The resulting “reduced headcount,” according to its January 30,2013, quarterly report, greatly decreased its costs for incentive pay.It mainly accomplished this reduction by expanding the number ofoutside contractors it employed, 8,000 in these five years, by oneWall Street analyst’s calculation. They were employed as systemadministrators, infrastructure analysts, computer security specialists,and other “geek squad” jobs at the NSA and other governmentagencies. Their main qualification was their prior security clearances(which as mentioned earlier saved Booz Allen the expense of vettingthem and also the loss of income while waiting many months for aclearance).Snowden therefore was highly desirable for Booz Allen from aneconomic point of view. Even though he had no prior experience asan infrastructure analyst, and he had been detected being untruthfulabout his degree in computer sciences, he not only had a SCI securityclearance but was willing to take a cut in pay. In keeping withthe Booz Allen business plan, such a recruit provided another cog inits profit machine.Not only had the NSA outsourced much of its computer opera-Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2159/30/16 8:13 AM216 | how america lost its secretstions to private companies, but the Clinton administration in 1996had privatized background checks for government employeesrequiring security clearances. The idea, backed by Vice PresidentAl Gore, was to reduce the size of the federal government by outsourcinginvestigating the backgrounds of millions of governmentapplicants for jobs. The task had previously been performed by theFBI, but it was assumed that a profit- making business could do itfaster and more efficiently. The private company named U.S. InvestigationsServices was purchased in 2007 for $1.5 billion by ProvidenceEquity Partners, a rapidly expanding investment firm foundedin 1989 by graduates of Duke, Brown University, and the HarvardBusiness School. So like Booz Allen, USIS was backed by a hedgefund determined to make money by systematically cutting the costof a service previously carried out by the government.But such outsourcing had drawbacks. For one thing, unlike theFBI, USIS lacked the investigative clout to gain entry to certain governmentagencies. A Congressional review found that the privacyact permits disclosure of government agency records to the privatefirm if they are part of a “routine use of the records,” but intelligenceagencies did not consider all such requests to be “routine. For example,when it did the background check on Snowden in 2011, it couldnot get access to his CIA file. The “derog” in his file might have setoff alarm bells, as might the fear that he had been threatened by aninternal investigation over his alleged computer tampering in 2009.The FBI might have learned this about Snowden if it had done hisbackground check.The lack of adequate oversight was another problem. USIS closedcases and cleared applicants without completing an adequate investigation.According to a U.S. government suit filed in 2014, USIShad prematurely closed over 665,000 investigations in order to getpaid for them more quickly. Because the more cases it completedeach month, the more money it received from the government, thelawsuit alleged that USIS employees often “flushed” or ended casesbefore completing a full investigation to meet corporate- imposedquotas for getting bonuses. One employee, in an e- mail cited in thegovernment’s complaint, said they “flushed everything like a deadgoldfish.” As a result, some information specialists entering the NSAEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2169/30/16 8:13 AMThe NSA’s Back Door | 217through the back door of outside contractors were not fully vetted.(On August 20, 2015, USIS agreed to forfeit $30 million in fees tosettle the lawsuit.)USIS was also open to sophisticated hacking attacks by outsiders.In August 2014, the Department of Homeland Security’s counterintelligenceunit discovered such a massive and persistent breachin USIS that it shut down its entire exchange of data with it. Theintrusion into USIS records in this case was attributed to hackers inChina most likely linked to the Chinese intelligence service. Suchmassive intrusions dated back to 2011. USIS’s lack of security in itswebsite left a gaping hole through which outside parties, includingChinese and Russian hackers, could learn both the identity and thebackground information of specialists applying for jobs at the NSA.These private companies also did not sufficiently protect the personaldata of their independent contractors working at the NSA.The hackers’ group Anonymous took credit for the successful 2011attack on the Booz Allen Hamilton servers. It also cracked the algorithmsused to protect employees. It next injected so- called Trojanhorse viruses and other malicious codes into Booz Allen serversthat allowed it future entry. If amateur hackers such as Anonymouscould break into the computers of the NSA’s largest contractor, socould adversaries’ state espionage services with far more advancedhacking tools. From these sites, China or Russia could obtain all thejob applications and personal résumés submitted to contractors suchas Booz Allen. It could then compile a list of the best candidates todo its bidding.These deficiencies in the private sector were compounded bythe failure of security in the government’s own Office of PersonnelManagement. It used a computer system called e- QIP in whichintelligence employees, including outside contractors, updated theircomputerized records to maintain or upgrade their security clearances.For example, Snowden updated his clearance in 2011. To doso, these employees constantly updated their financial and personalinformation. As it turned out, there was a major hole in the e- QIPsystem. It has repeatedly been hacked by unknown parties since2010. In 2015, the U.S. government told Congress that China wasmost likely responsible, but Russia and other nations with sophis-Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2179/30/16 8:13 AM218 | how america lost its secretsticated cyber services could have also participated in the hacking. Inany case, the records of over nineteen million employees, includingintelligence workers, became available to a hostile intelligence service.This breach would allow hostile services to obtain a great dealof information about independent contractors working at the NSA.They could then use this data to follow the movements of any ofthese intelligence workers they deemed of interest.Despite all the potential flaws in it, the outsourcing system continuedin place. It even featured a revolving door through which BoozAllen hired retiring executives from the intelligence services, suchas the former NSA director Michael McConnell; James Woolsey, aformer director of the CIA; and the retired general James Clapper,who later served as director of national intelligence.The cozy relationship between the private firms and the NSAnotwithstanding, the NSA leadership operated as if it were unawarethat outsourcing could create a security problem. As far back as2005 General Hayden, then the departing head of the NSA, hadbeen warned of one such vulnerability in a memorandum writtenby a counterintelligence officer at the NSA. Like the earlier 1996report by the threat officer, this memorandum noted the NSA hadceded responsibility for managing its secret systems to outsiders andwarned that the NSA’s reliance on them to manage its computershad opened a back door into the NSA. In addition, it warned thatonce an outside contractor managed to slip in through this back door,he could easily jump from one outsourcer to another. This was whatSnowden did when he moved from Dell to Booz Allen Hamilton in2013.Despite its security flaws, outsourcing seemed to provide a numberof advantages to the NSA. For one thing, it provided a means forcircumventing the budget restrictions imposed by Congress on hiringnew employees. In addition, because private companies had lessrigid hiring standards, it greatly expanded the pool of young systemadministrators by tapping into computer cultures that would beantagonistic to working directly for the government. Finally, it drewless on NSA resources. Because these information technologistswere only temporary employees, they were not entitled to militaryEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2189/30/16 8:13 AMThe NSA’s Back Door | 219pensions, paid medical leave, and other benefits. It was a system thateffectively replaced military careerists with freelancers.The irony of the situation was that the NSA had surrounded itsfront doors with rings of barbed wire, closed- circuit cameras, andarmed guards, but for reasons of economy, bureaucratic restrictions,and convenience it had left the back door of outsourcing open totemporary employees of private companies, even though it mighttake some time for them to gain entry to its inner sanctum.“It was not a question of if but when one of the contractors wouldgo rogue,” the former NSA executive who wrote the 2015 memorandumtold me. Snowden answered that question in 2013. Even moreextraordinary than the theft itself was the reaction to it by the NSA.It turned out that there was no cost of failure levied against the outsidecontractor Booz Allen, which had employed Snowden when hebypassed its security regime to steal the keys to the kingdom. Eventhough the counterintelligence investigation showed Snowden stoledocuments from compartments to which he did not have access, theNSA did not penalize Booz Allen. Instead, its revenues and profitsfrom government contracts markedly increased between 2013 and2015.Nor did the NSA alter its reliance on private contractors. The backdoor to the NSA remained wide open. Outsourcing to private companieshas become an all but irreplaceable part of the intelligencesystem in America, Snowden’s actions, and the risk of future similaractions, notwithstanding.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2199/30/16 8:13 AMc h a p t e r 21The Russians Are ComingThe collapse of the Soviet Union was a major geopolitical disasterof the century.— vladimir putinIn the first invasion of a European country since the end ofthe Cold War, Russian military forces moved into the Crimea andother parts of eastern Ukraine in February and March 2014. Unlikewith previous Russian troop movements, such as those into Poland,Hungary, Czechoslovakia, and East Germany during the Cold War,the weeklong massing of Russian elite troops and sophisticatedequipment for the move into Ukraine almost totally evaded detectionby the NSA’s surveillance. Never before had the NSA’s multibilliondollararmada of sensors and other apparatus for intercepting signalsmissed such a massive military operation. According to a report inThe Wall Street Journal that cited Pentagon sources, Russian unitshad managed to hide all electronic traces of their elaborate preparations.If so, after more than half a century of attempted penetrations,Russia had apparently found a means of stymieing the interceptioncapabilities of the NSA.Putin had firm ideas about restoring Russia’s power in the post–Cold War era. A formidable KGB officer before he became presidentEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2209/30/16 8:13 AMThe Russians Are Coming | 221of the Russian Federation in 2000, he made no secret that his goalwas to prevent the United States from obtaining what he termed“global hegemony.” His logic was clear. He judged the breakup ofthe Soviet Union in 1991 to be, as he put it, “a geopolitical disaster.”He argued that the breakup had provided the United States with themeans to become the singular dominant power in the world.He sought to prevent that outcome by moving aggressively toredress this loss of Russian power. He upgraded Russia’s nuclearforce, modernized Russia’s elite military units, and greatly strengthenedRussia’s relations with China. The last measure was essentialbecause China was Russia’s principal ally in opposing the extensionof American dominance. Yet there was still an immense gap betweenthem and the United States in communications intelligence.Since the breakup of the Soviet Union, the NSA had continued tobuild up its technological capabilities, while Russia teetered on theedge of collapse in the early 1990s. But as previously mentioned,the NSA’s legal mandate had been limited by Congress to foreigninterceptions (at least prior to 9/11). As a result, it was required toseparate out domestic from foreign surveillance, a massive processthat not only was time- consuming but could generate dissidencewithin the ranks of American intelligence. It also could not legallyuse its surveillance machinery to monitor the telephones and Internetactivities of the tens of thousands of civilian contractors who ranits computer networks— at least not unless the FBI began an investigationinto them.Here the Russian intelligence services had a clear advantage. Theyhad a lawful mandate to intercept any and all domestic communications.In fact, a compulsory surveillance system called by its Russianacronym SORM had been incorporated into Russian law in 1995.It requires the FSB and seven other Russian security agencies tomonitor all forms of domestic communications including telephones(SORM- 1), e- mails and other Internet activity (SORM- 2), and computerdata storage of billing information (SORM- 3). Not only didRussia run a nationwide system of Internet filtering in 2013, but itrequired its telecommunication companies to furnish it with worldwidedata.The NSA also had to deal with many peripheral issues other thanEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2219/30/16 8:13 AM222 | how america lost its secretsthe activities of Russia and China. It was charged with monitoringnuclear proliferation in Iran, Pakistan, and North Korea, potentialjihadist threats everywhere in the world, and much else. TheRussian foreign intelligence service, the SVR, could put its limitedresources to work on redressing the gap with its main enemy: theUnited States.Nevertheless, Putin had to reckon with the reality in 2013 thatRussia could not compete with the NSA in the business of interceptingcommunications. And if the NSA could listen in on all theinternal activities of its spy agencies and security regime, the abilityof Putin to use covert means to achieve his other global ambitionswould be impaired. In the cold peace that replaced the Cold War,Russia had little hope of realizing these ambitions unless it couldweaken the NSA’s iron- tight grip on global communications intelligence.One way to remedy the imbalance between Russian intelligenceand the NSA was via espionage. Here the SVR would be theinstrument, and the immediate objective would be to acquire theNSA’s lists of its sources in Russia. If successful, it would be a gamechanger.Such an ambitious penetration of the NSA, to be sure, was a tallorder for Russian intelligence. Most of its moles recruited in theNSA by the KGB had been code clerks, guards, translators, and lowlevelanalysts. They provided documents about the NSA’s cipherbreaking, but they lacked access to the lists of the NSA’s sources andmethods. These meager results did not inhibit Russian efforts. Forsix decades, ever since the inception of the NSA in 1952, the Russianintelligence service had engaged in a covert war with the NSA.The Russian intelligence service is, as far as is known, the onlyintelligence service in the world that ever succeeded in penetratingthe NSA. A number of NSA employees also defected to Moscow.The history of this venerable enterprise is instructive.The first two defectors in the NSA’s history were William Martinand Bernon Mitchell. They were mathematicians working on theNSA’s decryption machines who went to Moscow via Cuba in 1960.The Russian intelligence service, then called the KGB, went to greatlengths to get propaganda value from their defections. It even organizeda ninety- minute press conference for them on September 6,Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2229/30/16 8:13 AMThe Russians Are Coming | 2231960, at the Hall of Journalists and invited all the foreign correspondentsin Moscow. Before television cameras, the defectors denouncedthe NSA’s activities. Martin told how the NSA breached internationallaws by spying on Germany, Britain, and other NATO allies.Mitchell, for his part, suggested that the NSA’s practice of breakinginternational laws could ignite a nuclear war. Indeed, he justifiedtheir joint defection to Russia in heroic whistle- blowing terms,saying, “We would attempt to crawl to the moon if we thought itwould lessen the threat of an atomic war.” The NSA review of thecase, however, assessed that little damage had been done, because theNSA quickly changed the codes they had compromised. It noted,“The Communist spymasters would undoubtedly have preferredMartin and Mitchell to remain in place as moles, since their informationwas dated as of the moment they left NSA.”The next NSA defector was Victor Norris Hamilton, a translatorand analyst at the NSA. He arrived in Moscow in 1962, and likeMitchell and Martin he claimed the status of a whistle- blower. Thistime, the KGB provided a newspaper platform. Writing in the Russiannewspaper Izvestia, Hamilton revealed the extent of U.S. spyingon its allies in the Middle East.None of these three 1960s defectors revealed what, if any, NSAsecret documents they had compromised. Nor did any of them everreturn to the United States. Martin changed his name to VladimirSokolodsky, married a Russian woman, and died in Mexico City onJanuary 17, 1987. Mitchell vanished from sight and was reported tohave died in St. Petersburg on November 12, 2001. Hamilton, aftertelling Russian authorities stories about hearing voices in his headbecause of an NSA device implanted in his brain, was consigned toSpecial Psychiatric Hospital No. 5 outside Moscow.There were also KGB spies in the NSA who were caught or diedbefore they could defect. One of them was Sergeant Jack Dunlap.He was found dead of carbon monoxide poisoning in his garage onJuly 23, 1963. Although there was no suicide note, his death wasruled an apparent suicide. NSA classified documents were later discoveredin his house. After that, NSA investigators unraveled hisdecade- long career as a KGB mole. Dunlap had been recruited by theKGB in Turkey in 1952. The standard KGB tool kit for recruitmentEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2239/30/16 8:13 AM224 | how america lost its secretswas called MICE. It stood for Money, Ideology, Compromise, andEgo. The KGB used the first element, money, to compromise Dunlap.After he was compromised, it exploited him by getting him to stealNSA secrets. He had access to such secrets because he became thepersonal driver to Major General Garrison Coverdale, the chief ofstaff of the NSA. After Coverdale retired, he became the driver forhis successor, General Thomas Watlington. These positions affordedhim a security clearance and, even more important, a “no inspection”status for the commanding general’s cars that he drove. Thisperk allowed him to leave the base with secret documents, have themphotocopied by his KGB case officer, and then return them to the filesat the NSA base before anyone else knew they were missing. He alsoused, likely at the suggestion of the KGB case officers, his “no inspection”perk to offer other NSA employees a way of earning money.He would smuggle off the base any items of government propertythat they took. Once he had compromised them through thefts, hewas in a position to ask them for intelligence favors. This NSA ringcould not be fully investigated because of his untimely death. Otherthan the packets of undelivered NSA documents found in his home,the investigation was never able to assess the total extent of the KGBpenetration of NSA secrets. (Angleton suspected Dunlap was murderedby the KGB in what he termed a surreptitiously assisted death,to prevent Dunlap from talking to investigators.)The Russian intelligence services continued recruiting mercenaryspies in the NSA for the duration of the Cold War. The KGB successesincluded Robert Lipka, a clerk at the NSA in the mid- 1960s,who was caught in a sting operation by the FBI and sentenced toeighteen years in a federal prison. Ronald Pelton, an NSA analyst,was recruited after he retired from the NSA. After he was betrayedby a KGB double agent in 1985, he was sentenced to life imprisonment.Finally, there was David Sheldon Boone, an NSA code clerk,who between 1988 and 1992 provided the KGB with NSA documentsin return for $60,000. Boone, sentenced to twenty- four yearsin prison, was the last known KGB recruitment of the Cold War.During the Cold War, Russian intelligence service officers operatedmainly under the cover of the embassies, consulates, UnitedNations delegations, and other diplomatic missions of the SovietEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2249/30/16 8:13 AMThe Russians Are Coming | 225Union. As “diplomats,” they were protected from arrest by the termsof the 1961 Treaty of Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations.Their diplomatic cover, however, greatly limited their field for findingpotential recruits outside their universe of international meetings,diplomatic receptions, UN organizations, scientific conferences,and cultural exchanges. They therefore tended to recruit their counterpartsin adversary services.In this regard, the successful entrapment of Harold Nicholsonin the 1990s is highly instructive. From his impressive record, heseemed an unlikely candidate for recruitment. He had been a superpatrioticAmerican who had served as a captain in army intelligencebefore joining the CIA in 1980. In the CIA, he had an unblemishedrecord as a career officer, serving as a station chief in EasternEurope and then the deputy chief of operations in Malaysia in 1992.Even though his career was on the rise and he was a dedicated anti-Communist, he became a target for the SVR when he was assignedto the CIA’s elite Russian division. Because the job of this divisionwas to recruit Russian officials working abroad as diplomats, engineers,and military officers, its operations brought its officers in closecontact with SVR officers. Nicholson therefore was required to meetwith Russian intelligence officers in Manila, Bucharest, Tokyo, andBangkok and “dangle” himself to the SVR by feigning disloyalty tothe CIA.As part of these deception operations, Nicholson supplied theRussians with tidbits of CIA secrets, or “chickenfeed,” that had beenapproved by his superiors at the CIA. What his CIA superiors didnot fully take into account in this spy- versus- spy game was theSVR’s ability to manipulate, compromise, and convert a “dangle” toits own ends. As it turned out, Russian intelligence had been assemblinga psychological profile on Nicholson since the late 1980s andfound vulnerability: his resentment at the failure of his superiorsto recognize his achievements in intelligence. The Russians playedon this vulnerability to compromise him and then converted him tobecoming its mole inside the CIA.Nicholson worked for the SVR first in Asia; then he was given amanagement position at CIA headquarters, which is located in Langley,Virginia. Among other secret documents, he provided the SVREpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2259/30/16 8:13 AM226 | how america lost its secretswith the identities of CIA officers sent to the CIA’s special trainingschool at Fort Peary, Virginia, which opened the door for the SVR tomake other potential recruitments. Meanwhile, it paid him $300,000before he was finally arrested by the FBI in November 1996. (Afterhis conviction for espionage, he was sentenced to twenty- three yearsin federal prison.) The CIA postmortem on Nicholson, who was thehighest- ranking CIA officer ever recruited (as far as is known), madeclear that even a loyal American, with no intention of betraying theUnited States, could be entrapped in the spy game.When it comes to recruiting moles in a larger universe, intelligenceservices operate much like highly specialized corporate “headhunters,”as James Jesus Angleton described the process to me duringthe Cold War era. He was referring to the similar approach that corporatehuman resource divisions had with espionage agencies. Bothheadhunt by searching through a database of candidates for possiblerecruits to fill specific positions. Both types of organizations haveresearchers at their disposal to draw up rosters of potential recruits.Both sort through available databases to determine which of thenames on the list have attributes that might qualify or disqualifythem for a recruitment pitch. Both also collect personal data on eachqualified candidate, including any indication of his or her ideologicalleaning, political affiliations, financial standing, ambitions, and vanities,to help them make a tempting offer.But there are two important differences. First, unlike their counterpartsin the private sector, espionage headhunters ask theircandidates not only to take on a new job but also to keep theiremployment secret from their present employer. Second, they askthem to surreptitiously steal documents from him. Because they areasking candidates to break the law, espionage services, unlike theircorporate counterparts in headhunting, obviously need to initiallyhide from the candidates the dangerous nature of the work they willdo. Depending on the targeted recruit, they might disguise the taskas a heroic act, such as righting an injustice, exposing an illegal governmentactivity, or countering a regime of tyranny. This disguise iscalled in the parlance of the trade a false flag, as mentioned earlier.By using such a false flag, the SVR did not need to find a candidatewho was sympathetic to Russia or the Putin regime. In its longEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2269/30/16 8:13 AMThe Russians Are Coming | 227history dating back to the era of the czars, Russian intelligence hadperfected the technique of false flag recruitment, through which itassumes an identity to fit the ideological bent of a potential recruit.Russian intelligence was well experienced with false flags. It firstused this technique following the Bolshevik revolution in 1917 tocontrol dissidents both at home and abroad. The centerpiece, as lateranalyzed by the CIA, was known as the “Trust” deception. It beganin August 1921 when a high- ranking official of the Communistregime in Russia named Aleksandr Yakushev slipped away from aSoviet trade delegation in Estonia and sought out a leading anti-Communist exile he had known before the revolution in Russia. Hethen told him that he represented a group of disillusioned officials inRussia that included key members of the secret police, the army, andthe Interior Ministry. Yakushev said that they all had come to thesame conclusion: the Communist experiment in Russia had totallyfailed and needed to be replaced. To effect this regime change, theyhad formed an underground organization code- named the Trust,because the cover for their conspiratorial activities was the Moscowheadquarters of the Municipal Credit Association, which was a trustcompany. According to Yakushev’s account, it had become the equivalentof a de facto government by 1921.The exiled leader in Estonia reported this astonishing news toBritish intelligence, which, along with French and American intelligence,helped fund this newly emerged anti- Communist group.Initially, British intelligence had doubts about the bona fides of theTrust, as did other Western intelligence services sponsoring exilegroups. But they gradually accepted it after they received intelligencereports confirming its operations from many other sources,including Russian officials, diplomats, and military officers whoclaimed to have defected from the Soviet government. Because thesereports all dovetailed, they recognized the Trust as a legitimatelyunderground organization.Once the Trust had been established in the minds of the Westernintelligence services, it offered them as well as exile groups theservices of its network of collaborators. These services includedsmuggling out dissidents, stealing secret documents, and disbursingmoney inside Russia to sympathizers. Within a year, exile groups inEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2279/30/16 8:13 AM228 | how america lost its secretsParis, Berlin, Vienna, and Helsinki were using the Trust to deliverarms and supplies to their partisans inside Russia. The Trust alsofurnished spies’ and exiled leaders’ fake passports, which allowedthem to sneak back into Russia to participate in clandestine missions.It even undertook sabotage and assassination missions paid forby Western intelligence services. As they learned of police stationsbeing blown up and political prisoners escaped from prisons, theseagents and dissidents came to further believe in the power of theTrust.By the mid- 1920s, no fewer than eleven Western intelligenceservices had become almost completely dependent on the Trust forinformation about Russia. They also sent millions of dollars intoRussia via couriers to finance its activities.But suddenly exiled leaders working in Russia under the aegisof the Trust began to vanish. Then top Western intelligence agents,including Sidney Reilly and Boris Savinkov, were arrested, and theirnetworks were eliminated. Instead of the Communist regime collapsing,as the Trust had predicted, it consolidated its power andwiped out all the dissident groups. Finally, in 1929, the Trust wasrevealed by a defector to be a long- term false flag operation run bythe Russian intelligence service. Even the Trust building, rather thanbeing the cover for a subversive conspiracy, was the headquartersfor the Russian secret police during this eight- year operation. Thesecret police had provided the documents fed to Western intelligence,briefed the agents who pretended to defect, published the dissidentnewspapers the Trust distributed, fabricated the passports it suppliedexiles, blew up Russian buildings, and staged jail breaks to make thedeception more credible. It also collected the money sent in by Westernintelligence services, which more than paid for the entire deception.Because it was running the show, it could offer those lured intothe trap an opportunity to work for it as double agents. The alternative,if they refused, was to face a firing squad.Even after the Trust itself had been fully exposed, the Russian intelligenceservice continued to succeed with other false flag deceptions.During the Cold War, it set up a fake underground in Poland calledWIN, modeled on the Trust. It set up false flag groups in Ukraine,Georgia, Lithuania, Albania, and Hungary. It also had agents mas-Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2289/30/16 8:13 AMThe Russians Are Coming | 229querade as members of the security services of Israel, South Africa,Germany, France, and the United States to recruit unwitting agents.These deceptions became an integral part of the recruitments of theRussian intelligence services.Penetrating the NSA and getting access to files from its stovepipedcomputers was a far more difficult challenge for the SVR.Approaching CIA officers, such as Nicholson, was relatively easybecause it was part of the CIA officers’ jobs to meet with their adversaries.NSA officers, on the other hand, did not engage in “dangles”or even attend diplomatic receptions. They had no reason, other thana sinister one, to meet with a member of the Russian intelligenceservice. Furthermore, unlike CIA officers, who, like Nicholson, areoften posted in neutral countries where they can be approached in asocial context, NSA officers work at well- guarded regional bases andare not part of the diplomatic life. Because a known employee of aforeign diplomatic mission could not even approach an NSA officerwithout arousing suspicion, the SVR would need to use an intermediary,called an access agent, whose affiliations were not knownto the FBI. Such an operation would require establishing a networkof illegals in America, as the SVR did after Putin became president.Even then, the intermediary would have to find a plausible pretextto approach the target without revealing his actual interest. Suchcomplex operations at the NSA, as far as is known, only yielded afew low- level recruits.The emergence of computer networks in the 1990s greatlyexpanded the SVR’s recruiting horizon. It offered a new penetrationopportunity at the NSA: civilian technologists working under contractfor the U.S. government. Many of these civilians at the NSA,especially the younger ones, as we know, had been drawn from thehacking and game- playing culture; some had even taken courses onhacking techniques. They presented the SVR with inviting targetsfor recruitment. As was previously mentioned, Russian intelligencehad considerable experience in Germany with hacktivists, whotended to be anarchists. There were also supporters of the libertarianmovement. The common denominator was often their resentment,expressed in their postings, of the United States and its alliesattempting to limit the downloading of copyrighted music, movies,Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2299/30/16 8:13 AM230 | how america lost its secretsand software on the Internet, all of which fell under the rubric of“freedom of the Internet.” They also vocally objected to the NSA’susing built- in back doors in its software to read their encryptedmessages. Such people were not difficult to find on the Internet.The donors to Ron Paul’s libertarian election campaign (includingSnowden) were a matter of public record.Even if there was no shortage of hacktivists who believed the surveillanceof the Internet by the NSA was an evil worth fighting, theSVR still had to find a plausible way of approaching members ofthis counterculture without offending them. Clearly, the SVR couldno longer use out- of- date Communist and anti- capitalist ideologyas a lure. Russia was far more authoritarian than the United Stateswhen it came to the Internet. One viable alternative for the SVR wascustom- tailoring false flags to appeal to hacktivists.For this purpose, the Internet provided a near- perfect realm.Because it is a place where true identities cannot easily be verified,intelligence services could employ a protean kit of disguises toassume false identities to entice potential dissidents into communicatingwith them. The KGB’s earlier efforts to use hacktivist groupsin Germany had produced little if any intelligence about the NSAbecause of the stovepiping it used to isolate its computers from networksthat could be hacked into from the outside. It will be recalledthat the NSA threat officer had cited these failures in his 1996 reporton NSA vulnerability. He also said that efforts of the Russian intelligenceservices to use false flag recruitments provided the KGB with“a learning experience.” The KGB had learned that hacking by itselfcould not breach the NSA’s protective stovepiping. He predicted thatits next logical move would be to “target insider computer personnel.”This false flag recruitment would aim at, in his view, systemadministrators, computer engineers, and cyber- service workers whoeither were already inside the NSA or had a security clearance thatwould facilitate getting jobs with NSA contractors.Even with an appropriate false flag, the task of finding such a“Prometheus” required obtaining a database of those working atthe NSA. There were some five thousand civilian technicians at theNSA of all political stripes. Hacking into the personnel records ofthe intelligence workers seeking to renew their security clearanceEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2309/30/16 8:13 AMThe Russians Are Coming | 231was a place to begin. The Internet provided the SVR with just thisopportunity. As you will recall, holes in the security of the computernetworks of the U.S. Office of Personnel Management andUSIS and the websites of the companies supplying the NSA withindependent contractors had made the background checks on Americanintelligence workers available to the Chinese, and presumablyother adversary intelligence service hackers, since 2011. If the SVRhad access to this personnel data, the research for a candidate wouldbe greatly facilitated. From the 127- page Standard Form 86, whicheach applicant for a security clearance submits, the SVR could filterout intelligence workers employed by the NSA by their educationalbackground, employment history, affiliations, and foreign contacts.It could then search this data for candidates with a possible hacktivistprofile.This data could next be crossed with a list of individuals the SVRknew were in contact with high- profile activists who were part of theanti- surveillance movements. This would include core participantsin the Tor Project, WikiLeaks, Noisebridge, CryptoParties, the Freedomof the Press Foundation, and the Electronic Frontier Foundation.(Snowden, for example, had been in touch with members of allthese groups in 2012 and 2013.)The SVR would have little problem monitoring even encryptedcommunications with leading figures in the anti- surveillance world.These activists, despite secrecy rituals such as putting their cellphones in refrigerators, remain visible to a sophisticated intelligenceservice such as the SVR. All the defensive tactics of Laura Poitras,including PGP encryption, Tor software, and air- gapped computers(computers that have never been connected to the Internet), did notkeep secrets about her sources entirely to herself. Snowden, at a timewhen he was stealing NSA secrets in February 2013, went to greatlengths to impress on Poitras the need for operational security abouthis contacts with her, but that injunction did not prevent her fromtelling at least five people about her source, including Micah Lee, theBerkeley- based technology operative for the Freedom of the PressFoundation; Jacob Appelbaum, the Tor proselytizer; Ben Wizner, theACLU lawyer; Barton Gellman; and Glenn Greenwald. “It is not methat can’t keep a secret,” Abraham Lincoln joked. “It’s the people IEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2319/30/16 8:13 AM232 | how america lost its secretstell it to that can’t.” In the same vein, Poitras could hardly rely onthese five confidants not to tell her secrets (and Snowden’s) to others.Hours after he was told, Greenwald told his lover, David Miranda,about the source in great detail. He even asked him to evaluate thesource’s bona fides for him. Gellman, for his part, raised the matterwith a former high official at the Justice Department.Moreover, as the intelligence world knew, Poitras was herselfa veritable lightning rod for attracting ex- NSA employees whoobjected to some of its surveillance programs. In 2012, her previouslymentioned filming in Berlin of NSA insiders could make hercommunications of interest to intelligence services that wanted tokeep tabs on possible NSA dissidents.Nor was Snowden himself overly discreet. It will be recalled thathe had also advertised his Tor- sponsored CryptoParty activities overthe Internet and supplied Runa Sandvik, who worked with Appelbaum,his true name and address in Hawaii. Sandvik had no reasonnot to share the identity of her co- presenter with others in the Tormovement. Snowden, of course, had his girlfriend make a video ofhis presentation as well. He also bragged about operating the largestTor outlets in Hawaii. Even if his Tor software provided him with ameasure of anonymity, it was not beyond the ability of the worldclasscyber services to crack it.Under Putin, Russia had built one of the leading cyber- espionageservices in the world. According to a 2009 NSA analysis of Russiancapabilities, which was obtained by The New York Times in 2013,Russia’s highly sophisticated tools for cyber espionage were superiorto those of China or any other adversary nation. For example, investigatorsfrom FireEye, a well- regarded Silicon Valley security firm,found that in 2007 Russian hackers had developed a highly sophisticatedvirus that could bypass the security measures of the serversof both the U.S. government and its private contractors. Accordingto one computer security expert, the virus had made protected Internetwebsites “sitting ducks” for these sophisticated Russian hackers.The cryptographer Bruce Schneier, a leading specialist in computersecurity, explained, “It is next to impossible to maintain privacy andanonymity against a well- funded government adversary.”Nor has the Russian cyber service made a secret out of the fact thatEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2329/30/16 8:13 AMThe Russians Are Coming | 233it targets Tor software. It even offered a cash prize to anyone in thehacking community who could break Tor. Prior to 2013, accordingto cyber- security experts, it spent over a decade building cyber toolsaimed at unraveling the Tor networks used by hacktivists, criminalenterprises, political dissidents, and rival intelligence operatives. Tothis end, it reportedly attempted to map out computers that servedas major Tor exit nodes (such as the one Snowden operated in 2012near an NSA regional base in Hawaii). It also reportedly attachedthe equivalent of “electronic ink” to messages, which would allowit to trace the path of messages that passed through them. Throughthis technology, it could tag and follow Tor users as their communicationstraveled across the Internet. It could even borrow theirInternet identities. To be sure, the NSA also had such a capability.The Silk Road founder, Ross Ulbricht, discovered to his distress thathis Tor software did not make his computer server in Iceland invisible.According to a former top official in the Justice Department, theNSA was able to locate it by cracking the Tor software (Ulbricht iscurrently serving a life sentence for his activities). Unlike adversaryservices, however, the NSA needs a warrant to investigate U.S. citizenswho use Tor.The NSA is hardly immune from an attack on its own computers.As the former CIA deputy director Morell wrote in his 2015 book,The Great War of Our Time, many financial institutions have “bettercyber security than the NSA.” The Internet certainly helped makethe activities of U.S. intelligence workers visible to the SVR.But to achieve its goals, the SVR still had to find at least one disgruntledcivilian contractor inside the NSA who had access to thesealed- off computer networks. Did it find its man? If so, was it beforeor after Snowden arrived in Hong Kong with the Level 3 NSA files?Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2339/30/16 8:13 AMc h a p t e r 22The Chinese PuzzleThe first [false assumption] is that China is an enemy of theUnited States. It’s not.— edward snowden, Hong Kong, 2013On august 11, 2014, in the Atlantic Ocean, an event took placeof enormous concern to U.S. intelligence. A Chinese Jin- classsubmarine launched an intercontinental ballistic missile. The missilereleased twelve independently targeted reentry vehicles, each simulatinga nuclear warhead. Some forty- four hundred miles away, inChina’s test range in the Xinjiang desert, each of the twelve simulatednuclear warheads hit its target within a twelve- inch radius.The test firing, which was closely monitored by the NSA, was astrategic game changer. It meant that a single Jin- class submarine,which carried twelve such missiles and 144 nuclear warheads, coulddestroy every city of strategic importance in the United States. U.S.intelligence further reported that China would soon use stealthtechnology to make it more difficult to detect newer submarines andgive “China its first credible sea- based nuclear deterrent” against anAmerican attack.By 2015, as its test in the Atlantic had foreshadowed, China hadarmed its land- based as well as sea- based missiles with multipleEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2349/30/16 8:13 AMThe Chinese Puzzle | 235independently targeted warheads. Combined with the state- of- thearttechnology it had licensed from Russia, its systematic use ofespionage even made it possible for China to build its own stealthfighters.Unlike the United States, China did not achieve this remarkablecapability to launch independently targeted miniaturized nuclearweapons and stealth them by investing hundreds of billions of dollarsin developing them. It obtained this technology mainly throughespionage. The Chinese intelligence service stole a large part, if notall, of America’s secret technology for weaponizing nuclear bombsduring the 1980s and 1990s. The theft was so massive that in 1998the House of Representatives set up a special bipartisan investigativeunit called the Select Committee on U.S. National Security andMilitary/Commercial Concerns with the People’s Republic of China.Based on the intelligence amassed by the NSA, the CIA, and otherintelligence services, it concluded in its report that the Chinese intelligenceservice had obtained both by electronic and by conventionalspying the warhead design of America’s seven most advanced thermonuclearweapons. Moreover, it found that espionage successesallowed China to so accelerate the design, development, and testingof its own nuclear weapons that the new generation of Chineseweapons would be “comparable in effectiveness to the weapons usedby the United States.” Further, the committee reported that thesethefts were the “results of decades of intelligence operations againstU.S. weapons laboratories.” The Chinese intelligence service furtherobtained from private U.S. defense contractors through cyber espionageimportant elements of the stealth technology used in advancedplanes and submarines. China shared (or exchanged) the fruits of itsespionage on nuclear warhead design with North Korea, Pakistan,Iran, and Russia.Despite its formidable intelligence coups in the United States, theChinese intelligence service managed to remain among the mostelusive of America’s intelligence adversaries. Its espionage organizationsare hidden behind layers of bureaucracy in the Ministry ofState Security, Chinese Communist Party structures, and the second,third, and fourth department of the General Staff of the People’sLiberation Army. Much of its cyber- espionage units are concealedEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2359/30/16 8:13 AM236 | how america lost its secretson the campuses of its universities. Its hierarchy is also obscure.Few traces have been uncovered of any conventional espionage networksin the United States, and no major Chinese spy has ever beenarrested. Part of the reason that Chinese espionage has proved so elusiveto the eyes of Western counterintelligence is that, unlike Russia,it did not ordinarily rely on intelligence officers in its embassies torecruit penetration agents to steal secrets. It did not even have anembassy in the United States during most of the Cold War. Instead,its services specialize in mosaics of intelligence assembled from awide variety of sources, including nonclassified documents, returninggraduate students, scientific conferences, exchanges with allies,and a vast operation of hacking into computers, or cyber espionage.Such espionage is indeed a vast enterprise in China. Graduatingover 150,000 computer science engineers in the 1990s, it had noshortage of personnel. It had also developed the cyber tool kit to gainaccess to the computer networks of U.S. government contractors andconsultants in the private sector and government agencies, planting“sleeper” bugs in networked computers. Like human sleeper agents,these hidden programs can be activated when needed for operationalpurposes. Chinese controllers can often retrieve e- mails and documentsand can turn on the cameras and microphones of personalcomputers, tablets, and smart phones.By 2007, Paul Strassmann, a top U.S. defense expert on cyberespionage, reported that China had inserted “zombie” programs insome 700,000 computers in the United States, which could be used tomount cyber attacks to retrieve e- mails from other computers. TheChinese service also reportedly penetrated companies that provideInternet services, including Google, Yahoo!, Symantec, and Adobe,which allowed it to track e- mails and enclosures of individuals. Withsuch an invisible army of zombie computers, it is not entirely surprisingthat China finds little need to employ human sleeper agents.Chinese cyber specialists used this capability to hack into thecomputers of outside contractors, including Booz Allen and othercompanies that supplied technologists to the NSA. It also had notablesuccesses in obtaining the dossiers of U.S. employees and independentcontractors at the NSA, the CIA, and other intelligenceservices. Its intrusions, as previously noted, into computer networksEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2369/30/16 8:13 AMThe Chinese Puzzle | 237at the Office of Personnel Management traced back to 2009. Eventually,by 2015, according to U.S. estimates, the cyber attack hadharvested over twenty million personnel files of past and presentfederal government employees. In addition, it reaped over fourteenmillion background checks of intelligence workers done by the FederalInvestigative Services.All intelligence workers with a sensitive compartmented informationclearance, such as Snowden, were required to provide informationon these forms about all their foreign acquaintances, includingany non- U.S. officials whom the applicant knew or had had relationshipswith in the past. They also had to list their foreign travel,family members, police encounters, mental health issues, and credithistory. For good measure, Chinese hackers obtained the confidentialmedical histories of government employees by hacking into thecomputers of Anthem and other giant health- care companies. IfChina’s intelligence services consolidated the fruits of these hackingattacks, it would have a searchable database of almost everyoneworking in the American defense and intelligence complex. Fromthis database, it could track individuals with high security clearancesvulnerable to being bribed, blackmailed, or tricked into cooperating.No one doubted that the Chinese would use their cyber capabilitiesto take advantage of opportunities presented in foreign computersystems.General Hayden said of the massive theft of intelligence personnelrecords, “Those records are a legitimate foreign intelligence target.”He added, “If I, as director of the NSA or CIA, would havehad the opportunity to grab the equivalent in the Chinese system,I would not have thought twice.” If that opportunity did not arisefor the NSA or the CIA during Hayden’s tenure, it might have beenbecause no insider in the Chinese intelligence services provided U.S.intelligence with a road map to it.Cyber espionage was not the Chinese intelligence service’s onlypowerful resource in the intelligence war. To get both electronicintelligence and human intelligence about the United States, Chinaalso had a highly productive intelligence- sharing treaty with Russia.It was signed in 1992 after the Soviet Union was dissolved. Althoughthe terms of this exchange remain secret, defectors from the Rus-Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2379/30/16 8:13 AM238 | how america lost its secretssian KGB and SVR reported that Chinese intelligence received fromRussia a continuous stream of communications intelligence aboutthe United States in the late twentieth and early twenty- first centuries.Russia’s intelligence resources during this period were formidable.They included geosynchronous satellites, listening stationsin Cuba, sleeper agents, and embassy- based spy networks. Presumably,this relationship further deepened under President Putin’sregime. Putin asserted in speeches in 2014 that Russia and Chinacontinued to share a key strategic objective: countering the UnitedStates’ domination of international relations, or what Putin terms“a unipolar world order.” China’s president, Xi Jinping, expressed avery similar view, saying in 2014 in a thinly veiled reference to theUnited States that any attempt to “monopolize” international affairswill not succeed.Since the end of the Cold War, Russia has been the major supplierof almost all of China’s modern weaponry. It licenses for manufacturein China avionics, air defense systems, missile launchers, stealthtechnology, and submarine warfare equipment. To make these armseffective, it also provides China with up- to- date intelligence aboutthe ability of the United States and its allies to counter them. Whilesuch intelligence cooperation may be limited by the reality thatChina and Russia still compete in many areas, they still have reasonto share much of the fruits of their cyber and conventional espionageagainst the NSA in accordance with their intelligence. After all,the NSA works to intercept the military and political secrets of boththese allies. Moreover, as the CIA’s former deputy director Morellpoints out in his book, NSA secrets are a form of currency for adversariesin the global intelligence war, saying that part of Snowden’scache could be traded by a country that acquired it to the intelligenceservices of Iran and North Korea.Snowden’s stay in Hong Kong from May 20 to June 23 in 2013made the Chinese intelligence service, willy- nilly, a potential playerin whatever game he was involved in. China’s full responsibility forHong Kong’s national security and foreign affairs includes monitoringforeign intelligence operatives. Chinese intelligence main-Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2389/30/16 8:13 AMThe Chinese Puzzle | 239tains there its largest intelligence base outside mainland China. Alarge contingent of its officers are stationed officially in the Princeof Wales skyscraper in central Hong Kong and unofficially maintaininformers in Hong Kong’s police, governing authority, airportadministration, and other levers of power. It checks the computerizedvisitors entering Hong Kong and has the capability to ferretnames that match those in the immense database its global cyberespionage has amassed. When it detects the entry of any person ofpossible intelligence interest, it can use its sophisticated array ofcyber tools to attempt to remotely steal data from that individual.Such remote surveillance was so effective in 2013 that the U.S. StateDepartment had instructed all its personnel in Hong Kong to avoidusing their iPhones, Androids, BlackBerry phones, and other smartphones when traveling to Hong Kong or China. Instead, it suppliedthem with specially altered phones that disable location trackingand have a remotely activated switch to completely cut off powerto its circuitry. No one in the intelligence community doubts theprudence of taking such precautions in China, and it is nearly inconceivablethat Snowden, whose prior position at the NSA includedteaching military personnel about Chinese capacities, could himselfbe unaware of Chinese intelligence service capabilities to acquiretravelers’ data in Hong Kong.Once Hong Kong had served as a window into China for Westernintelligence, but in the first decade of this century the Chineseintelligence service had achieved such a pervasive presence in HongKong, and such ubiquitous electronic coverage of diplomats andother foreigners even suspected of involvement in foreign intelligencework, that the CIA and British intelligence found it almostas difficult to operate in Hong Kong as in mainland China. Eventhough the CIA kept officers there in 2013, it was considered “hostileterritory,” according to the former CIA officer Tyler Drumheller.Snowden apparently knew the limits of CIA operations in HongKong, which provided him with an envelope of protection. He toldGreenwald that he was counting on the Chinese presence in HongKong to deter the CIA from intruding on their meetings.When he flew to Hong Kong in May 2013, he took with himNSA secrets, which he knew would be of great interest to China.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2399/30/16 8:13 AM240 | how america lost its secretsIn fact, he advertised that he had such secrets in his interview withthe South China Morning Post. Whatever he might have assumedabout the inability of the CIA to stop him in Hong Kong, he couldnot assume that Chinese intelligence services would relegate themselvesto a purely passive role when secret NSA documents were ina hotel room in Hong Kong. Snowden might have esteemed himselfto be an independent actor playing Prometheus on a global stageprovided by YouTube, but the Chinese might have viewed him verydifferently indeed.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2409/30/16 8:13 AMc h a p t e r 23A Single Point of FailureA single point of failure (SPOF) is a part of a system that, if itfails, will stop the entire system from working.—WikipediaSnowden described anyone who was the sole repository ofsecrets that could undo the NSA’s intelligence gathering as “thesingle point of failure.” While still shielding his own identity in May2013, he wrote to Gellman that U.S. intelligence “will most certainlykill you if they think you are the single point of failure that couldstop this disclosure and make them the sole owner of this information.”Such a person of course would be of even greater interest toadversary intelligence services if they were aware of the payload ofsecrets that person was carrying because they could use it to unravelthe NSA’s sources and methods.Snowden saw himself as that “single point of failure.” We knowthat while still in Hong Kong he said he had obtained access to computersthat the NSA had penetrated throughout the world and inMoscow he added that he had had “access to every [NSA] target,every [NSA] active operation,” against the Chinese. “Full lists ofthem,” which, if he chose to share them, could make China “godark.” To be sure, he did not refer to Russian intelligence activity inEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2419/30/16 8:13 AM242 | how america lost its secretsany interview that he ever gave in Moscow under Russian protection,but he had similar access to NSA operations against Russia inhis job at the NSA’s Threat Operations Center.The enormous power of the NSA rested in its ability to keep itssources and methods secret from its foes. A queen on the chessboardcould be captured by a lowly pawn if it was well- placed. Inthis case, the person who had it in his power to expose the NSA’scritical sources and methods would no doubt be considered fair gameby America’s adversaries, including the Chinese and Russian cyberservices. Indeed, how could they resist such a prize?Snowden might have believed that he was in control, but the CIAbelieved that confidence was misinformed. “Snowden thinks he issmart,” Morell said, after reviewing the case on a panel appointedby President Obama, “but he was never in a position in his previousjobs to fully understand the immense capabilities of our Russian andChinese counterparts.” He could adopt a cocky tone in his postmortemconversations with journalists in Moscow, but in truth he hadno means to block the efforts of the Chinese or Russian services inHong Kong. Even before Snowden contacted its diplomats in HongKong, the Russian intelligence service would swing into action todetermine his intelligence value.How many days he planned to be in Hong Kong depended on howspeedily he could arrange a meeting with journalists. “The purpose ofmy [Hong Kong] mission was to get the information to journalists,”he told the editor of The Guardian after he was safely ensconced inMoscow. He indicates that he was working under a tight clock. Thetime pressure resulted in his e- mailing an ultimatum to Gellman onMay 24: either Gellman would publish the selected documents inThe Washington Post within seventy- two hours, or he would losethe exclusive scoop. Snowden wanted the story to break on May 27,without his true identity (which Gellman did not know) attached toit. His identity would be known to a foreign mission in Hong Kong ifGellman acceded to his demands, because, as previously mentioned,Gellman’s story would enclose an encoded signal he planned to useas proof of his bona fides. So even before the Guardian reporters hadagreed to come to Hong Kong, Snowden had plans to deal with aforeign mission. If the Post had accepted his terms, Snowden wouldEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2429/30/16 8:13 AMA Single Point of Failure | 243have been in a very different position. The story would have brokenbefore Poitras or Greenwald even knew about Snowden’s presencein Hong Kong, and his identity would be secret except for whateverforeign mission he had contacted. But, as we know, the Post turneddown his ultimatum.Time was running out if he was to break the story and leave HongKong before the NSA realized he was missing. At best, he was safeuntil June 3, when he was supposed to return from his medical leave.If he failed to show up in Hawaii on June 3, alarm bells at the NSAwould go off, and it would not take long to find him. Airline recordswould show that he had flown to Hong Kong. Snowden told Poitrasthat NSA security would ask, “This guy isn’t where he sayshe’s supposed to be. He’s supposed to be getting medical treatment.Why the hell is he in Hong Kong?” It would not take long to determinethat he had lied about his medical treatment, and then the huntwould begin.He had, remember, already sent Poitras an enciphered file and toldher she would get the key once she followed his instructions. Greenwaldhad still not committed himself to meeting Snowden. Greenwaldwas, however, willing to publish the documents once Snowdenprovided them. That Snowden remained in Hong Kong suggests thathis reason for going to and remaining in Hong Kong went beyondjust delivering documents to journalists, which he could have doneover the Internet. What he could not do in America, without riskingarrest, was to make and release a video.In any event, after his attempt to pressure the Post, Snowdenasked Greenwald to fly immediately to Hong Kong. Presumably, hestill wanted Greenwald’s story and the video done in Hong Kongbefore he became a suspect. If Greenwald and Poitras had immediatelyflown to Hong Kong, it still might have left Snowden an escapewindow.But of course things do not always go as planned. Greenwald,although agreeing to come to Hong Kong, waited in New Yorkfor two days while the Guardian editors completed their due diligence.Poitras waited with him. As a result of this delay, as we know,Green wald and Poitras did not arrive at his hotel in Hong Kong untilJune 3, only hours before Snowden became suspect at the NSA. “ItEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2439/30/16 8:13 AM244 | how america lost its secretswas a nervous period,” Snowden recalled. Although he bravely toldThe Guardian “there was no risk” that the information he carriedhad been compromised by other parties in Hong Kong, that claimwas, at best, wishful thinking on his part.By this time, he had registered at the hotel under his true nameand provided his credit card; he was in contact with three highprofilejournalists, two well- known hacktivists, and, as he suggestedto Gellman, a foreign diplomatic mission.The mission’s interest would likely be piqued when the newspaperpublished its first story on June 6. Greenwald then went onTV in Hong Kong, revealing to every interested intelligence servicethat a defector from the NSA was in Hong Kong providing secretdocuments.Poitras released the famous video showing Snowden and secretNSA documents three days later. At this point, Snowden shonebrightly as a beacon to NSA secrets to every player in the intelligencegame, even if they did not know the extent of the damage hecould inflict on American intelligence.Snowden fogged over his travel plans to the media by tellingreporters that he intended to remain in Hong Kong and fight extradition,but certainly the Russian officials whom he contacted becameaware that he had other plans, having relayed his request to go toRussia to their superiors in Moscow. And, unlike the media, anysophisticated intelligence service was well aware of his movements.In Hong Kong, cell phones emit their GPS location every three seconds;even if Snowden disabled his own phone, lawyers and helperscould be tracked with ease.China’s president, Xi Jinping, who was meeting President Obamafor the first time in Rancho Mirage, California, on June 8, wouldhave been keenly interested in the unfolding Snowden affair. Obamahad publicly called Xi to task for Chinese cyber espionage, and nowthat charge was undermined by Snowden’s accusation that theUnited States was engaged in massive cyber espionage. U.S. intelligenceverified that China instituted a full- court press of Snowdenin Hong Kong immediately after the release of the video. Fromthat moment on, any communication or movement Snowden madeEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2449/30/16 8:13 AMA Single Point of Failure | 245during his next fifteen days in Hong Kong would not likely escapeChina’s scrutiny.The United States had the ability to also follow Snowden’s movementsvia the cell phones of his lawyers and other confederatesafter he surfaced. All tracking could be done by the NSA. What theUnited States lacked was any practical means to capture a highprofileintelligence defector in a city that was part of China. By thistime, U.S. intelligence had established that Chinese and Hong Kongsecurity services were monitoring Snowden’s every move. This leftfew options in the game for the United States. “I’m not going tobe scrambling jets to get a twenty- nine- year- old hacker,” PresidentObama said on June 27.The real prize, in any case, was not Snowden but the NSA’s secretdocuments that he had with him. When Snowden was observedentering the Russian consulate, the game was all but over. U.S. diplomatscould protest over back channels to Moscow, as they did, butwith a trove of NSA secrets at stake there was little expectation thatwould stop the Russians. Two days later, the “single point of failure,”as Snowden described himself, was on his way to Russia, where hishosts would be calling the shots.When a victory is obtained in a major sports event, it is cause forpublic celebrations. The opposite is true in espionage. An intelligencevictory involving secret documents, even if it cannot be entirelyhidden, is kept veiled, as far as is possible, to increase the value ofthe coup. “The final move in any sophisticated intelligence game,”Angleton told me in relation to espionage intelligence, is “obscuringa success.”Following Angleton’s precept, the Russian or Chinese intelligenceservices, if they had a role in acquiring the product of the selfdescribed“single point of failure,” would work to cover their tracks inthe affair even before the Aeroflot plane carrying Snowden toucheddown at Sheremetyevo International Airport on June 23. If any falseflag operations had been used to trick, mislead, or otherwise induceSnowden to come to Hong Kong, they would be disbanded. If anysafe house had been used to quarter Snowden in his first eleven daysin Hong Kong, it would be shut down. If any operatives had beenEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2459/30/16 8:13 AM246 | how america lost its secretsused in Hawaii to guide or assist Snowden, they would be put backinto sleeper mode. If any telltale traces had been left in chat roomsor social media, they would be systematically deleted. Even moreimportant to the ultimate success of such a communications intelligencecoup, measures would be taken to conceal the extent of thedamage done by the “single point of failure” by not precipitouslyclosing down compromised sources. Snowden might believe thatthe power of the information he held was so great that if disclosedby him, all the NSA’s sources would immediately go dark in Russiaand China, but Russia might not wish to provide such clarity to itsadversaries. An intelligence service need not close down channelsit discovers are compromised by an adversary. Instead, it can electto continue to use them and furnish through them bits of sensitiveor misleading information to advance its own national interest. Thereal danger here was not that the NSA’s “lights” would dramaticallybe extinguished but that all the future messages illuminated bythose lights would be less reliable sources of intelligence. The gameof nations is, after all, merely a competition among adversaries togain advantages by the surreptitious exchange of both twisted andstraight information.To review: When the NSA asserted in the summer of 2013 thatover one million documents had been compromised, it was recognizingthe most massive failure in its sixty- year history. Not onlywere NSA secrets taken, but secret files from the CIA, the BritishGCHQ, and America’s cyber military commands had been compromised.It was, as Sir David Omand, the former head of the BritishGCHQ, described it, a “huge strategic setback” for the West. Thegenie could not be put back into the bottle. There is not a reset buttonin this game. The best that the NSA could do now was damagecontrol while its adversaries took full advantage of the setback. Severalhundred U.S. and British intelligence officers worked around theclock in Washington, D.C., Fort Meade, Maryland, and Cheltenham,England, for months on end to determine which parts of the mostpowerful communications intelligence system in the world could besalvaged from what had been the Snowden breach.Adding insult to injury, Snowden, speaking from his new perchin Moscow, told applauding audiences that the entire purpose ofEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2469/30/16 8:13 AMA Single Point of Failure | 247the U.S. exercise, including deliberately “trapping” him in Moscow,was to “demonize” him. “There was no question that I was goingto be subject to a demonization campaign.” Snowden said in Moscow,“They [Greenwald and Poitras] actually recorded me on camerasaying this before I revealed my identity.” Snowden asserted this“demonization” was to divert attention from the government’s owncrimes. By providing Snowden with this platform to rail against theputative machinations of the United States, Putin laid claim to themoral high ground.Snowden’s motive in requesting documents from other foreignintelligence services, such as the GCHQ, and copying lists of NSAsources remains unexplained. It is difficult to believe that his motivewas whistle- blowing, because these documents were not amongthose he gave to journalists in Hong Kong. Indeed, he did not providethe journalists with the lists of sources that were particularlyrelevant to the NSA’s surveillance of Russia. His legal representativein Moscow, Kucherena, confirmed that Snowden had takensecret “material” to Russia and had access to NSA documents thathe had not given to journalists. Those unrevealed documents wouldbe prized by many an adversary service. Did he use those documentsas leverage in his transformation? The role that Moscow might haveplayed in Snowden’s defection clearly requires a closer examinationof the machinations that brought Snowden to Russia. That is why Ivisited Moscow in October 2015.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2479/30/16 8:13 AMEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2489/30/16 8:13 AMpart fourMOSCOW CALLINGDeception is a state of mind— and the mind of the state.— james jesus angletonEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2499/30/16 8:13 AMEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2509/30/16 8:13 AMc h a p t e r 24Off to MoscowThey talk about Russia like it’s the worst place on earth. Russia’sgreat.— edward snowden, Moscow, 2015Before flying to Moscow, I arranged to have dinner withOliver Stone at an Italian restaurant on the Upper East Side ofNew York. I had greatly respected Stone’s ability as a film directorafter watching him work on Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps, a filmin which I had a cameo role. I had also debated Stone about the historicalaccuracy of his 1991 movie JFK at Town Hall in New York.When we dined, he had just written, produced, and directedSnowden, an independently financed film depicting Snowden, asStone put it, as “one of the great heroes of the twenty- first century.”In preparing for it, Stone had seen Snowden in 2013 and 2014 andhad had a six- hour meeting with Putin.I wanted to talk to Stone not to learn about the film but to learnhow he had gained access to Snowden in Moscow. I knew from thedocuments taken from Sony Pictures Entertainment— allegedly byNorth Korea— that Stone had paid The Guardian $700,000 for thefilm rights to The Snowden Files, a book written by Luke Harding.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2519/30/16 8:13 AM252 | how america lost its secretsThese documents also revealed that Stone had paid Anatoly Kucherena,Snowden’s legal representative in Moscow, $1 million, supposedlyfor the rights to his novel, Time of the Octopus. Even byHollywood standards, $1 million was an extraordinary sum to payfor a yet- to- be- published work of Russian fiction, and it was especiallystriking because Stone was making a fact- based movie usingthe actual names of the characters, and he had already bought therights to The Snowden Files.“Is your script based on Kucherena’s Time of the Octopus?” Iasked.“No,” Stone replied. “I haven’t used it.”He said that the payment was for what he termed “total access.”He explained that Barbara Broccoli and Michael G. Wilson, the producersof the James Bond franchise, had optioned Greenwald’s bookNo Place to Hide to make into a movie about Snowden for Sony.Stone said that the million- dollar deal with Kucherena effectivelyguaranteed that any competing project would not have access toSnowden. Sony consequently put the competing film on hold.Lawyers often negotiate deals on behalf of a client, but blocking acompeting film requires considerably more influence with the powersthat be in Russia. Kucherena, though, was no ordinary lawyer.Among other influential positions, I noted earlier, he was on the publicboard of the Russian federal security bureau, which had assumedthe domestic operations of the defunct KGB in April 1995. In lightof such connections, Stone said Kucherena might be acting as anintermediary for other parties who controlled access to Snowden inRussia. In any case, his concern was making a movie, and Kucherenadelivered the exclusive access to Snowden.Aside from being a skilled director, Stone is a shrewd producerwho knows how to close a deal. He assessed, correctly as it turnedout, that his project coupled with the payment to Kucherena wouldeffectively block Sony’s competing project. Where the money wentwas far less clear.Toward the end of our dinner, Stone told me that he did not knowI was writing a book about Snowden until a few weeks earlier. Helearned of my book from Snowden himself. He said Snowden hadEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2529/30/16 8:13 AMOff to Moscow | 253expressed concern to him about the direction of the book I was writing.“What is it about?” Stone asked me.I was taken aback. I had no idea that Snowden was aware of mybook. (I had not tried to contact him.) I told Stone that I consideredSnowden an extraordinary man who had changed history and wasintentionally vague in my description of my book’s contents. Stoneseemed to be reassured, so I asked him about the possibility of myseeing Snowden in Moscow. He said that I “might want to speakto Anatoly [Kucherena].” Kucherena, it seemed to me, was clearlySnowden’s gatekeeper.In Snowden’s two years in Moscow, he, or his handlers, had grantedonly a handful of face- to- face press interviews. Most of these werewith the journalists who had published his story, but one was withJames Bamford for his 2014 Wired piece. According to Bamford, ittook nearly nine months to arrange the meeting. “I have been tryingto set up an interview with him [Snowden]— traveling to Berlin,Rio de Janeiro twice, and New York multiple times to talk withthe handful of his confidants who can arrange a meeting,” Bamfordrecounted in Wired. After my dinner with Stone, I hoped to find aquicker route.I was advised by a Moscow- based journalist that I needed a“fixer,” the curious term that journalists commonly use to describe alocal intermediary who arranges appointments in foreign countries.I retained Zamir Gotta, a highly respected TV producer in Moscow,who I was told had helped “fix” the Bamford interview withSnowden.“There is only one door to Snowden,” Zamir wrote to me. “Hisname is Kucherena.” Zamir said Kucherena rarely saw journalists,but he had a contact in his office. He further told me Kucherenarequired any journalist seeking an interview with Snowden tosubmit his questions to the lawyer two weeks in advance and, ifapproved, to sign a document stating he would not deviate from thequestions. Next, my questions had to be translated from English toRussian (even though Snowden does not speak Russian) and thenvetted by Kucherena’s staff. Zamir also suggested I stay at the HotelNational in Red Square because Snowden had gone there for pre-Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2539/30/16 8:13 AM254 | how america lost its secretsvious meetings with Bamford. So I sent Kucherena, via Zamir, tenquestions that I wanted to ask Snowden.I next obtained a multi- entry Russian visa from the Russian consulatein New York and booked myself a room in the Hotel National.My night flight from New York to Moscow took just less thaneight hours and landed at Terminal D of Sheremetyevo InternationalAirport at 7:40 a.m. on October 29, 2015. I did not immediatelyproceed through passport control, in part because I wanted toexplore the transit zone in which Snowden was supposedly trappedfor six weeks.Sheremetyevo Two, where all international flights land, was builtin the waning days of the Cold War for international passengersarriving for the Moscow 1980 Summer Olympics. It was modernizedin 2010, including opening a walkway that connects TerminalsD, E, and F for transit passengers.Snowden had vanished, at least from public view, in this complexof terminals for nearly six weeks in the summer of 2013. Hisexplanation to journalists, as will be recalled, was two part. First, hesaid he had planned to board the next fight to Cuba and from thereproceed to Ecuador. He said that he was unable to board this flightbecause his passport had been invalidated by the U.S. governmentwhile he was flying to Russia. Second, after discovering his passporthad been revoked, he stayed in a capsule hotel in the transit zone forthe next thirty- nine days. To better understand the plausibility ofhis version of those events, I proceeded through the transit passageto Terminal F, where Snowden’s plane from Hong Kong had landedat 5:15 p.m. Moscow time on June 23, 2013.Snowden did not go through passport control upon arrival.Before any of the other passengers were allowed to disembark fromthe plane, Russian plainclothes officers from the special servicesboarded the plane and asked both Snowden and Sarah Harrison, hisWikiLeaks- supplied “ninja,” to accompany them to a waiting carthat whisked them away. According to the account in Izvestia, “Aspecial operation was conducted for his reception and evacuation.” Itfurther said, “Snowden’s flight to Moscow was coordinated with theRussian authorities and intelligence services.”If not for the “special operation,” he could have easily gone by footEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2549/30/16 8:13 AMOff to Moscow | 255to Terminal E. It is a nine- minute walk through the transit passageway.Snowden, though, had one good reason for not going to Ecuador,even if Russia had permitted it. He believed that he would bevulnerable to rendition by the U.S. government in Ecuador. “If they[the U.S. government] really wanted to capture me, they would’veallowed me to travel to Latin America, because the CIA can operatewith impunity down there,” he explained in the previously citedinterview with Katrina vanden Heuvel, the editor of The Nation, in2014. He had already discussed the likelihood of his being capturedin Ecuador with Assange before his departure for Moscow. He latertold Alan Rusbridger, the editor of The Guardian, that he consideredhimself at risk in Latin America. So why would Snowden, who toldGreenwald that his “first priority” was his own “physical safety,”leave the comparative safety of Russia to put himself in jeopardy inEcuador?He had not obtained a visa to Ecuador at its consulate in HongKong, as Kucherena confirmed. The Ecuador destination was, as wehave seen, a cover story put out by Assange and his associates, and itworked with the press.Over a hundred reporters and photographers scrambled aboardAeroflot Flight SU150 to Cuba the next morning in response to thisanonymous tip on a website, but Snowden was not aboard that flightand was not seen in Terminal E. By the time the plane landed inCuba, Aeroflot denied that anyone named Snowden had ever beenbooked on any of its flights to Cuba, a denial it continued to repeat toevery reporter who queried the airline for the next six weeks.The first news that Snowden was still in Russia came on July 1,2013. A statement posted on the WikiLeaks website— and signed“Edward Snowden”— after thanking “friends new and old” for his“continued liberty,” accused President Obama of pressuring “leadersof nations from which I have requested protection to deny my asylumpetitions.” It added, “This kind of deception from a world leaderis not justice, and neither is the extralegal penalty of exile. These arethe old, bad tools of political aggression.” In fact, Snowden had notsuffered a “penalty of exile,” because his passport was still valid forreturning to the United States, but that was not an option for him asthe statement made clear.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2559/30/16 8:13 AM256 | how america lost its secretsBecause the Aeroflot flight to Cuba was the only means of gettingdirectly from Moscow to Latin America, Russian reporters,encouraged by WikiLeaks posts, continued taking the daily elevenhourflight to Cuba until August 1. The charade only ended whenKucherena said in a press conference at the airport that Snowdenwould be taking up residency at an undisclosed location in Moscowand walked out of the airport with Snowden.Sarah Harrison, Snowden’s companion on the plane to Moscow,told Vogue that she and Snowden for thirty- nine days had shareda windowless room in the transit zone of the airport where theywatched TV, washed their clothes in a sink basin, and ate meals fromthe nearby Burger King. The only hotel with windowless roomsin the transit zone in 2013 was the Vozdushny V- Express CapsuleHotel, located next to a newly opened Burger King.The polite V- Express desk clerk, who spoke English, showed methe standard windowless double room. It was approximately twentyfoursquare feet in area. Most of the floor space was taken up by twinbeds. Across from the bed, behind a plastic curtain, was a stall witha shower, a toilet, and a sink. It would be very cramped quarters fortwo people to share for such an extended period. It cost 850 rubles anhour (about $18 in 2013). For thirty- nine days, that hourly chargewould have added up to $16,600. Snowden claimed to the BBC thathe brought a large cache of cash to Russia, which he could have usedto pay the hotel. But such a long stay was not allowed, according tothe desk clerk. The maximum stay allowed by the hotel was twentyfourhours. So either the rule was waived for Snowden, or Harrisondid not tell the full truth.I learned from a former KGB officer that there are VIP quartersbeyond the confines of the airport, including suites at the fourhundred-room Novotel hotel, which is located about seven milesaway, that are used for debriefing and other purposes by the securityservices. According to him, the security services are not restrictedfrom entering and leaving the transit zone.The possibility that Snowden was staying elsewhere would helpexplain the futile search for him by a large number of reportersover those thirty- nine days. When they learned from tweets thatSnowden was not aboard the plane to Havana on June 24, for weeksEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2569/30/16 8:13 AMOff to Moscow | 257they aggressively questioned all the restaurant employees, securityguards, and airport personnel they could find. They also boughtbusiness- class tickets on flights just to gain access to VIP lounges inthe transit zones. Despite this intensive search, none of them founda single person who had seen Snowden, although his image was constantlyshown on airport TV screens. Egor Piskunov, a reporter forRT television, even rented a room in the V- Express Capsule Hoteland “tipped” hotel employees, trying, without success, to get information.Piskunov told me, “It was a total vanishing act.”Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2579/30/16 8:13 AMc h a p t e r 25Through the Looking GlassThere’s definitely a deep state. Trust me, I’ve been there.— edward snowden, Moscow, 2014While waiting to hear back from Kucherena’s office, Iarranged to meet with Victor Cherkashin, who had been oneof the most successful KGB spy handlers in the Cold War. Cherkashin,born in 1932, had served in the KGB’s espionage branchfrom 1952 until 1991 and now operated a private security firm inMoscow. I was particularly interested in his recruitment of threetop American intelligence officers: Aldrich Ames of the CIA, RobertHanssen of the FBI, and Ronald Pelton of the NSA. I hoped that seeingthese intelligence coups through the eyes, and mind- set, of theirKGB handler might provide some historical context for the Snowdendefection. So I invited Cherkashin to lunch at Gusto, a quiet Italianrestaurant, located near the Chekhov Theater in Moscow.Cherkashin, a tall thin man with silver hair, showed up promptlyat 1:00 p.m., wearing an elegant gray suit and dark tie. He walkedwith a spry step. Because he had served in counterintelligence in theSoviet embassy in Washington, D.C., for nearly a decade, he spokeflawless English.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2589/30/16 8:13 AMThrough the Looking Glass | 259I began by asking him about one of the more celebrated cases hehad handled for the KGB, that of Ames, who had acted as a Russianmole in the CIA between April 1985 and January 1994. In those nineyears, he rose, or was maneuvered by the KGB, into a top positionin the CIA’s highly sensitive Counterintelligence Center AnalysisGroup, which allowed him to deliver hundreds of top secrets to theKGB. In return, according to Cherkashin, Ames received between$20,000 and $50,000 in cash for each delivery, which amounted to$4.6 million over the nine years.I asked Cherkashin about the weakness the KGB looked for in anAmerican intelligence worker that might lead him to copy and stealtop secret documents. How did he spot a potential Ames? Was it afinancial problem? Was it a sexual vulnerability? Was it an ideologicalleaning?“Nothing so dramatic,” he answered. When assessing Ames’sbiographical data, Cherkashin said he was looking for a well- placedintelligence officer who was both dissatisfied with and antagonisticto the service for which he worked.“The classic disgruntled employee,” I interjected.“Any intelligence officer who strongly feels that his superiors arenot listening to him, and that they are doing stupid things, is a candidate,”he continued. He said he had found that the flaw in a prospectthat could be most dependably exploited was not his greed, lust,or deviant behavior but his resentment over the way he was beingtreated.“Is that how you spotted Ames?”“Actually, he approached us, not vice versa.” It was his job in theCIA to approach opposition KGB officers. “But, yes, we saw thepotential,” he said.Because Ames had been paid $50,000 in cash by Cherkashin forhis first delivery, I asked whether he fit into the category of a disgruntledemployee.“Wasn’t he just a mercenary?” I asked.“I knew from our intelligence reports that he needed moneyfor debts stemming from his divorce,” he answered. “But he wasalso angry at the stupidity and paranoia of those running the CIA.Ames told me at our first secret meeting that they were misleadingEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2599/30/16 8:13 AM260 | how america lost its secretsCongress by exaggerating the Soviet threat.” Cherkashin evaluatedAmes as a man who felt not only slighted by his superiors but “helplessto do anything about it” within the bureaucracy of the CIA.“The money we gave, even if he could spend only a small portionof it, gave him a sense of worth.” He explained that the KGB hadan entire team of psychologists in Moscow that worked on furtherexploiting Ames’s resentment against his superiors.The search for an adversary intelligence officer who resents hisservice was not limited to KGB recruiters. It was also the “classicattitude” that the CIA sought to exploit in its adversaries, accordingto a former deputy director. “You find someone working for theother side and tell him that he is not receiving the proper recognition,pay, and honors due him,” Morell said, pointing out that thesame “psychological dynamic” could be used to motivate someoneto “act alone” in gathering espionage material.I next turned to an even more important KGB coup with Cherkashin:the Robert Hanssen case. From the KGB’s perspective, Hanssenwas an extraordinary espionage source. He was a walk- in whonever entered the Soviet embassy or met with KGB case officers, butin working as a KGB mole between 1979 and 2001, he had deliveredeven more documents to the Russian intelligence services thanAmes. Cherkashin learned of this potential spy when he received ananonymous letter from him identifying an FBI source in the Sovietembassy. When that tip proved to be accurate, Cherkashin got theresources he needed from the KGB to develop this source. From thestart of his work for the KGB, Hanssen laid down his own rules.The KGB would deliver cash from which all the fingerprints wereremoved to locations, or “dead drops,” he specified. He would deliverdocuments exposing FBI, CIA, and NSA sources and methods inanother dead drop. The KGB would precisely follow his instructions.Cherkashin told me that Hanssen’s “astounding self- recruitment”was executed in such a way that the KGB never actually controlledhim. “He was our most important mole and we didn’t ever know hisidentity, where he worked, or how he had access to FBI, CIA, andNSA files.” Even so, the KGB (and later the SVR) paid him $600,000in cash. In return, the anonymous spy delivered twenty- seven com-Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2609/30/16 8:13 AMThrough the Looking Glass | 261puter disks containing hundreds of secret documents revealing thesources and methods of American intelligence. According to Cherkashin,it was the largest haul of top secret documents ever obtainedby the KGB (although it was only a small fraction of the number oftop secret NSA, Department of Defense, and CIA documents takenby Snowden in 2013). Cherkashin told me the price paid by Moscowwas a great bargain because it helped compromise “the NSA’s mostadvanced electronic interception technology,” including a tunnelunder the Soviet embassy.Yet it was only after newspapers reported that Hanssen had beenarrested by the FBI in February 2001 that Cherkashin learned thename and position of the spy he had recruited. Cherkashin told methat what mattered to the KGB was not “control” of an agent but thevalue of the secrets he or she delivered. “Control is not necessary inespionage as long as we manage to obtain the documents.” So in theeyes of the KGB, anyone who elected to provide it with U.S. secretswas a spy.“All we knew was that he delivered valuable documents to us andasked for cash in return,” he said. “We didn’t control him; he controlledus.”An uncontrolled mole who provided secrets to the KGB and theSVR for twenty- two years was very different from fictional molesin the spy movies. I asked whether it would have been better if theKGB had him under its control.“Possibly,” Cherkashin answered. “But as it turned out, Hanssenwas by far our most valuable penetration in the Cold War.”“Could Hanssen really be called a mole?” I asked.“A ‘mole’ is a term used in spy fiction,” he said. “We prefer themore general term ‘espionage source.’ ”“So anyone who delivers state secrets to the KGB, for whateverreason, is an espionage source?” I asked.“Certainly, if the information is valuable to us,” Cherkashinanswered.“If some unknown person simply delivered a trove of top secretcommunications secrets to the doorstep of Russia, would it beaccepted?” I asked with Snowden in mind.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2619/30/16 8:13 AM262 | how america lost its secrets“I can’t say what the SVR would do today. I am long retired,” hesaid, with a nostalgic shake of his head. “But in my day, we neededsome reason to believe the gift was genuine.”“Would you need to vet the person delivering it?”“With Hanssen we did not have that opportunity,” he said. “Ifwe believed the documents were genuine, we would of course grabthem.”The final recruitment I asked Cherkashin about was that of RonaldPelton, the civilian employee of the NSA who had retired in 1979.Pelton had left the NSA without taking any classified documentswith him. After retiring, he had financial difficulties, and he soughtto get money from the KGB. On January 14, 1980, he walked intothe Soviet embassy in Washington, D.C., and asked to see an intelligenceofficer. After he was ushered into a secure debriefing room, hesaid that he had information that Russia would find interesting, buthe wanted money in return. What interested me about the Peltoncase was that Cherkashin proceeded to recruit Pelton, even thoughhe was no longer working at the NSA and no longer had access tothe NSA. In addition, because the FBI had twenty- four- hour surveillanceon the embassy, Pelton had almost certainly been photographedentering it and had also possibly been recorded asking foran intelligence officer by electronic bugs that the KGB suspected theNSA had planted there. What did the KGB do in a situation in whicha former civilian employee at the NSA possessed no documents?Despite the risks involved, Cherkashin decided Pelton had to bedebriefed by communications intelligence specialists. So he had himdisguised as a utility worker and smuggled out in a van to the residentialcompound of the ambassador in Georgetown. A few dayslater, he was dropped off at a shopping mall.“Why did you go to such effort if Pelton had neither documentsnor access to the NSA?” I asked.“It was the information in his head that we wanted.” Cherkashinsaid that because the KGB rarely got access to any NSA officer, itwas worth the risk. So Pelton was given $5,000 in cash and a planeticket to Vienna, where he was domiciled at the residence of theSoviet ambassador to Austria. A KGB electronic communicationsexpert, Anatoly Slavnov, was then sent to Vienna to supervise theEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2629/30/16 8:13 AMThrough the Looking Glass | 263Pelton debriefings. The debriefing sessions, which went on for fifteendays, were from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. In them, Pelton managed torecall Project A, a joint NSA- CIA- navy operation in which submarinessurreptitiously tapped into Soviet undersea cables in the Seaof Okhotsk, which connected to the Soviet Pacific Fleet’s mainlandheadquarters at Vladivostok. Pelton received another $30,000 fromthe KGB.“Did the information in his head prove valuable?” I asked.“As long as the NSA didn’t know the tap was compromised byPelton, we could use the cable to send the NSA the information wewanted it to intercept.” He said that while actual NSA documentswould have proved more useful than someone’s memories, “Our jobis to take advantage of whatever we can get.”Two years later, Pelton was again flown to Vienna for anotherdebriefing to see if he could recall any further details. According toCherkashin, the KGB’s job was to leave no stone unturned whenit came to the NSA’s sources. In 1985, the KGB’s task ended whenPelton was arrested by the FBI. Like Ames and Hanssen, Pelton wassentenced to life imprisonment.Looking at his watch, Cherkashin politely excused himself.I subsequently spoke to Colonel Oleg Nechiporenko, who hadbeen a foreign intelligence officer in the KGB between 1958 and1985 and continued his intelligence work until recently as chiefcounterterrorism expert of the Russian- led Collective SecurityTreaty Organization. Over a leisurely coffee in the bar of the HotelNational, he told me that many “walk- ins” who contacted Sovietofficials in his time were emotionally disturbed, but all of them hadto be assessed for possible intelligence value. “Our job was to findespionage sources,” he said with a twinkle in his eye. “The Internethas changed the espionage business since secret documents can bemassively downloaded by an unhappy employee,” he said, “but theystill need to be assessed by a professional.”Through the eyes of the KGB, a penetration of American intelligencewas clearly opportunistic. If these practices continued, theyput Snowden’s situation in a new light for me. If Russian intelligenceconsidered it worthwhile to send a former civilian worker atthe NSA, such as Ronald Pelton, two thousand miles from Washing-Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2639/30/16 8:13 AM264 | how america lost its secretston, D.C., to Austria so that its specialists could debrief him on thesecrets he held in his head, it would have an even greater interest inexfiltrating Snowden from Hong Kong to get, aside from his documents,whatever secrets he held in his head. If Russian intelligencewere willing to opportunistically accept the delivery of U.S. secretsfrom an unknown espionage source that it neither recruited norcontrolled, such as Hanssen, it would obviously have little hesitancyin acquiring the secrets that Snowden had stolen of his own volition,even if Snowden had acted for idealistic reasons.If Russian intelligence focused its search pattern on disgruntledAmerican intelligence workers, such as Ames, it is plausible that itspotted Snowden through his Internet rants against U.S. surveillance.Even if it had missed Snowden in Hawaii, a disgruntled formercivilian employee at the NSA would have received its full attentionafter he contacted Russian officials in Hong Kong. While the tacticsof the SVR might have changed since Cherkashin retired, its objectivesremained the same. And the NSA remained its principal target.Nor is there any reason to doubt that it still measures success in itsability to obtain, by whatever means, the secret sources and methodsof its adversaries. Snowden was in a position, with both the documentshe had taken and the knowledge he had in his head, to deliverthe KGB such a coup.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2649/30/16 8:13 AMc h a p t e r 26The HandlerAs for [Snowden’s] communication with the outside world, yes, Iam his main contact.— anatoly kucherena, Moscow, 2013On november 1, I still had not been able to make contact withAnatoly Kucherena, and my flight back to New York was in fivedays. My fixer, Zamir, had been trying to arrange an appointmentfor three weeks, but he had only received one callback from Kucherena’sassistant, Valentina Kvirvova. She wanted to know how I knewOliver Stone. Zamir told her of my part in Stone’s movie. That wasthe last he had heard from her. Meanwhile, a Moscow- based journalisttold me that she had waited eighteen months to hear back fromKucherena before giving up. I also learned from a Russian researcherthat Kucherena had not given a single interview since his televisioninterview with Sophie Shevardnadze on September 23, 2013. Andno Russian journalist, or any Moscow- based foreign journalist, hadever obtained an interview with Snowden. At this point, Zamir wasbecoming increasingly doubtful about my getting access to eitherKucherena or Snowden.I turned to another contact in Moscow. When I had been investigatingthe 2006 polonium poisoning of the former KGB officerEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2659/30/16 8:13 AM266 | how america lost its secretsAlexander Litvinenko, I had interviewed Andrei Lugovoy. A formerKGB officer assigned to protecting the Kremlin’s top members in the1990s, Lugovoy later opened his own security company. In 2005, hebecame a business associate of Litvinenko’s in gathering informationand made regular trips to London to meet with him. Becausehe had tea with Litvinenko at the Pine Bar of the Millennium Hotelin London on November 1, 2006, the day Litvinenko was poisoned,he became the main suspect in the British investigation. He couldnot be extradited, however. After reconstructing the chronology ofthe crime, I established that Litvinenko had been contaminated withpolonium at a Japanese restaurant some four hours before his teawith Lugovoy. I therefore wrote that the crime scene might not havebeen at the Pine Bar, a finding that he said he greatly appreciated.Lugovoy was elected to the Duma in 2007 and also hosted atwenty- four- part television series on espionage for which Putin personallydecorated him. He was also now reputed to be in the innercircle of power in Moscow. So I called him.We arranged to meet in the bar of the Hotel National. A shortbut well- built man with a bullet- style haircut, Lugovoy showedup promptly at 1:00 p.m. After discussing some of the subsequentdevelopments in the still- lingering polonium investigation, I askedhim if he knew Kucherena.“I don’t know him, but I know someone who does,” he answered.“Why are you interested in seeing Kucherena?”I told him that I wanted to speak to him about Snowden but I hadbeen unable to arrange a meeting.“That’s no problem,” he said, raising his cell phone (which neverleft his hand). He hit a number on the speed dial and spoke rapidlyin Russian (which I do not understand). He cupped his hand over thephone and asked how long I would be in Moscow. After I told himthat I was leaving that Friday, he spoke again in Russian to the personon the other end. “You will have an appointment on Thursday,”he said.Later that afternoon, Valentina, Kucherena’s assistant, called tosay that Kucherena would be happy to see me at his office at 6:00 p.m.on Thursday. I didn’t ask Lugovoy whom he had called. WhomeverLugovoy called obviously had the power to arrange the meeting.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2669/30/16 8:13 AMThe Handler | 267When I arrived at Kucherena’s office, I was with my translatorZamir. (Kucherena did not speak English.) I arrived ten minutesearly, and a receptionist showed me into a well- lit square roomwith an elegant table in the center. There was a sumptuous basketof exotic fruits on the table and large portraits of racehorses on thewalls. Another door opened, and a tall, graceful woman came into theroom and introduced herself as Valentina. She was wearing a wellfittingblack dress, a striking jade necklace, and high heels. Whenshe asked whether we would like anything to drink, it seemed morelike the prelude to an elegant dinner party than an interview aboutSnowden.Valentina spoke very good English. She apologized for the delayin responding to my requests, explaining that she received “thousandsof requests” for interviews and did not have time to answerthem. When I asked how many were answered, she shrugged andsaid, “Not many.”At that moment, Kucherena entered with a jaunty step, a cherubicface, and untamed white hair. He was wearing gray slacks, a partiallybuttoned cashmere polo sweater, and a fully engaging smile.As I had learned from his entry in Wikipedia, he was born in asmall village in the Soviet Socialist Republic of Moldavia in 1960and had obtained his law degree from the All- Union CorrespondenceLaw Institute in 1991. He opened his own law firm in Moscowin 1995. Kucherena’s well- known friendship with Putin hadevidently not hurt his law practice. His clients had included suchwell- connected defendants as Viktor Yanukovych, the president ofUkraine overthrown in 2014; Grigory Leps, a Russian singer blacklistedby the United States for allegedly acting as a money courierfor a Eurasian criminal organization; Valentine Kovalev, a formerRussian minister of justice charged with corruption; and SuleymanKerimov, a civil servant from Dagestan who had amassed an estimatedfortune of $7.1 billion. Kerimov had recently been chargedfor manipulating the price of potash in Belarus. Most of these clientswere reputed to be part of Putin’s inner circle.To break the ice, I asked Kucherena about Oliver Stone. I knewhe had a small role in Stone’s forthcoming movie, in which he playsSnowden’s lawyer in Moscow.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2679/30/16 8:13 AM268 | how america lost its secrets“I was impressed by how few takes he needed to shoot my scene,”he answered.“How did you come to be Snowden’s lawyer?” I asked.“Snowden picked me from a roster of fifteen lawyers with whichhe had been provided.”Because Snowden did not speak or read Russian, I asked Kucherenaabout how Snowden had come to pick him from the roster. Couldhe have known about his connections?“I suppose it was because of my record in defending humanrights,” Kucherena replied with a broad smile.Kucherena went to Sheremetyevo International Airport to meethis new client on the morning of Friday, July 12, 2013. At that point,he said that Snowden had been held virtually incommunicado fortwenty days. Other than Russian officials, the only person he hadbeen allowed to see during this period was Assange’s aide, SarahHarrison.“Where in the airport did you meet him?” I asked. “Was it in aVIP lounge?”“It was in the transit zone,” he replied coyly. “That is all I can say.”They spoke through a translator. By this time, Harrison had senttwenty- one countries petitions for asylum that were signed bySnowden. Whatever their purpose, Kucherena did not consider themhelpful.“I told him that if he wanted to get sanctuary in Russia, he wouldhave to immediately withdraw all the petitions in which he hadasked other countries for asylum.” Kucherena said that otherwise hecould not represent him. Snowden agreed to that condition.Shortly before 5:00 p.m., Kucherena accompanied Snowden, whowas wearing an open- neck blue shirt and a badly creased jacket, toarea G9 in the transit zone, where they emerged from a door marked“Authorized Personnel Only.” A number of officials in dark suits,who Kucherena assumed were from the “special services” to protectSnowden, were already in the room. Snowden and Harrison seatedthemselves at a table. A Russian translator was also seated at thetable. At this point, thirteen invitees were ushered into the roomto witness Snowden’s first public appearance in Russia. It was rareEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2689/30/16 8:13 AMThe Handler | 269if not unprecedented for an American intelligence worker to seekasylum in Russia.These invitees included some of Putin’s close associates, progovernmentactivists, and representatives of both Amnesty Internationaland Human Rights Watch. “It was totally bizarre,” saidTanya Lokshina, the deputy director of Human Rights Watch, whoattended. “Although it was billed as a press conference,” she recalled,“there was no press or photographers allowed in the room.” Nor wasanyone allowed to photograph or record the event.Snowden read from a prepared statement accusing the U.S. governmentof violating the Universal Declaration of Human Rights,saying he was a victim of political persecution, and concluding, “Iwill be submitting my request to Russia today [for asylum], andhope it will be accepted favorably.” After answering a few questionsposed by the audience, he left the room with Kucherena and Harrisonby the same door they had entered.In discussing this meeting, Kucherena told me that Snowden hadnot intended to seek asylum in Russia when he arrived on June 23.Because he also said he had not met Snowden prior to the day of theconference, I asked how he knew Snowden’s intentions.“When I accepted the case, I received Snowden’s dossier,” heanswered. “I was able to see all his interviews.”Presumably, Snowden’s dossier included his interviews with theFSB, the SVR, and other Russian security services. If so, it wouldexplain how Kucherena could be so certain that Snowden hadbrought “material” with him to Russia that he had not provided tojournalists in Hong Kong. Before meeting with Kucherena, I hadmet with Sophie Shevardnadze, who told me that Kucherena hadpersonally approved the translation of their interview into English.So I asked Kucherena about the interview. It will be recalled that inresponse to a question about whether Snowden had secret materialwith him in Russia, Kucherena had said “certainly.” Was thisexchange accurate?“It was accurate,” he answered.Snowden, as we know, had said in Hong Kong that he had onlygiven journalists some of the state secrets he had stolen and that heEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2699/30/16 8:13 AM270 | how america lost its secretsdeemed others too sensitive for journalists. So I wanted to find outfrom Kucherena which documents Snowden had taken to Russia. Iwent about it in a roundabout way. When Shevardnadze asked himabout the secret material Snowden might reveal in Russia, Kucherenapointedly called her attention to Snowden’s CIA service, suggestingthat he might possess CIA files. I also knew that in Kucherena’sroman à clef, he had Joshua Frost, the thinly veiled Snowden- basedcharacter, steal a vast number of CIA documents that could do greatdamage to U.S. intelligence. By retaining them, Frost made himselfa prime target of the CIA.So I asked, “Is Joshua Frost fact or fiction?”“I can’t tell you that,” he said. “If I said he was Snowden, it wouldviolate the attorney- client privilege.”“I understand,” I said. “But did Snowden do what Frost did inyour book?”“That is for you to decide,” he answered with a sly smile. “It’s myfirst novel.”When I asked if he could arrange for me to see Snowden, hesaid that first I would have to submit my questions to Ben Wizner,Snowden’s American lawyer at the ACLU. He made it clear to methat the exposure of Snowden to journalists, or at least the vetting ofjournalists, had been outsourced to Wizner. Kucherena was handlingSnowden’s liaisons with the Russian authorities while Wizner washandling the Snowden narrative, including selecting the media outlets.Presumably, Wizner had handpicked Snowden’s past interviewersin Moscow, including Barton Gellmna, James Bamford, BrianWilliams, John Oliver, Alan Rusbridger, and Katrina vanden Heuvel.“After that, the final decision is up to Snowden,” he said. Thatseemed to conclude the interview, but as I got up to leave, he added,“His legal defense is fairly expensive.”Snowden had said in a BBC interview in 2015, as previously mentioned,that he had brought enough cash to Hong Kong and Russiato cover all of his expenses. So I asked Kucherena if Snowden hadbrought his own funds.“He was penniless when he arrived,” he replied. I found thatanswer plausible because the FBI reportedly had not found a largecash withdrawal from his account before his departure and it seemedEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2709/30/16 8:13 AMThe Handler | 271to me too risky for him to carry a large sum of undeclared cashthrough three airports. Because large sums of cash must be declared,the detection of the money could compromise his plan to deliver hisNSA documents. Snowden might have told the BBC he had broughtcash to allay suspicions about who was financing his stay in Moscow.I was intrigued by this remark. Snowden, as far as I knew, didn’tneed a legal defense, because he was not charged with a crime inRussia and the United States had no extradition treaty with Russia.While Kucherena unfortunately did not arrange an interview withSnowden, he did something I considered more important. He confirmedthe accuracy of his September 2013 assertion that Snowdenhad brought secret material to Russia, material he had not given tojournalists in Hong Kong. After what I had learned from Cherkashinabout the lengths that Russian intelligence would go to obtain U.S.communications intelligence secrets, I viewed Snowden’s access tothis material to be a crucially important part of the mystery.That day, I immediately sent my questions to Ben Wizner, and Ioffered to fly back to Moscow if Snowden would grant me an interview.In March 2016, Wizner answered that Snowden had “respectfullydeclined.”Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2719/30/16 8:13 AMEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2729/30/16 8:13 AMpart fiveCONCLUSIONS:WALKING THE CAT BACKIn solving a problem of this sort, the grand thing is to be ableto reason backward.— sherlock holmes, A Study in ScarletEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2739/30/16 8:13 AMEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2749/30/16 8:13 AMc h a p t e r 27Snowden’s ChoicesIt is the choices we make that show who we truly are.— j. k. rowling, Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s StoneRussian authorities had the opportunity to thoroughlydebrief Snowden as to his motive for stealing state secrets,whereas U.S. authorities did not. It cannot be assumed that he hada single consistent motive in 2013. Snowden has shown, if nothingelse, that he was adaptable to changing circumstances. He might havebegun taking documents for one reason and found other reasons ashe proceeded in his quest. Many of the reported circumstances of hisactivities, including his probes, contacts, theft, and escape, are disputedby his supporters. Many of his other activities are shroudedby the secrecy of the NSA. We do know, though, that Snowden madefour extraordinary choices during the nine- month period in 2013. If,as is said, actions speak louder than words, Snowden’s four choicesilluminate the underlying concerns guiding his acts. In the case of aclassified intelligence breach, as in the post- action analysis of a masterfulchess game, the sequence of moves a player makes provides animportant clue to his strategy. Let us review what we have alreadylearned about these decisions.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2759/30/16 8:13 AM276 | how america lost its secretsThe First DecisionThe initial move that Snowden made in preparation for the Level 3breach was switching jobs on March 15. Snowden chose to leave hisjob as a system administrator at Dell to take one at Booz Allen as ananalyst in training. His motive could not have been money, becauseit was a lower- paying position. At the time he made this choice, hehad already set up an encrypted channel with Laura Poitras for thepurpose of sending her secret material. But he did not have to changejobs to send her important secrets. So what was his purpose in makingthis fateful choice?The job change was not necessary to expose NSA domestic activities.If he had only wanted to be a whistle- blower, there were ampledocuments about the NSA’s activities already available to him onthe NSANet. He also had access at Dell to the administrative filethat contained the FISA court orders issued every three months toVerizon. In addition, as the NSA’s damage assessment established,before switching jobs, Snowden had already taken most of the documentspertaining to the NSA’s domestic operations that he couldhave supplied to Poitras and Greenwald for whistle- blowing purposes.Indeed, while still at Dell, he had told Poitras he had a copyof Presidential Policy Directive 20, a document in which PresidentObama authorized the NSA to tap into fiber cables crossing theUnited States. Snowden described it to her as “a kind of martial lawfor cyber operations, created by the White House.” True, he took amore recently issued FISA order and PRISM presentation in Aprilafter switching jobs, but he could just as easily have taken the January2013 version of the FISA order from the administrative file ofDell. It would have had the same explosive effect in the media.Nor did he switch jobs to lessen the risk of getting caught. Actually,the change put him in far greater jeopardy. At Dell, he was relativelysafe from apprehension because he could take documents,such as the Presidential Policy Directive 20, from access points atthe NSA shared by many of his peers, making it difficult to trace thetheft. Indeed, if he just wanted to expose the NSA’s domestic operations,he could have done the entire operation at Dell. He could evenEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2769/30/16 8:13 AMSnowden’s Choices | 277have sent Poitras documents anonymously over his own Tor softwareand server. And he could have remained in his self- described“paradise” in Hawaii with his girlfriend.When he chose to move to Booz Allen, the risk of exposuregreatly increased because of its auditing system. Any documents hetook without authorization could be traced back to him (though notin real time). As he later told Greenwald and Poitras, he knew thatstealing documents at the Booz Allen job meant that he would eithergo to prison or escape from America. He didn’t want to face prisontime, so the job change required an escape plan. As part of that plan,soon after he started work at the Booz Allen– managed facility, hesubmitted a request for a medical leave of absence.We can safely assume that the reason he made this risky switchin employment was that he wanted something beyond the whistleblowingdocuments. He wanted documents that were not availableat the Dell job. One such document he took was the top secretCongressional Budget Justification book for fiscal year 2013. This“black budget,” as it is called in Congress, contained the entire intelligencecommunity’s priorities for, among other things, monitoringthe activities of potential adversaries and terrorist organizations.It specified the money requested not only by the NSA but by theCIA, the DIA, the National Reconnaissance Office, and other intelligenceservices. Snowden could not have objected to the budget’sbeing somehow secret or illegitimate, because it was duly approvedby both houses of Congress and the president. If it was not for purposesof whistle- blowing, presumably he had another purpose fortaking such a document. It certainly held value to other actors. “Forour enemies, having it [the black budget] is like having the playbookof the opposing NFL team,” said the former CIA deputy directorMorell in 2015. “I guarantee you that the SVR, the Russian foreignintelligence service, would have paid millions of dollars for such adocument.” If unlike Ames, Hanssen, and Pelton, Snowden was notafter acquiring money, he must have seen another value in taking it.The documents he stole at Booz Allen certainly increased hisvalue to adversary nations, because they included lists revealing theNSA’s sources in Russia, China, and other foreign countries.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2779/30/16 8:13 AM278 | how america lost its secretsSnowden wanted more than just NSA secrets. He used his newposition and widened access at Booz Allen to go after secret documentsfrom the intelligence services of Britain, Australia, NewZealand, and Israel. He revealed this operation only after receivingsanctuary in Russia. He told an interviewer that by moving to hisnew Booz Allen job as an infrastructure analyst, he gained the abilityto pry secrets out of the allies of the NSA. “I had a special levelof clearance, called ‘Priv Ac,’ ” he said. This “priv ac” status did notallow him to bypass the password protection at sealed- off compartmentsat the NSA, but it did allow him to request files from foreignservices cooperating with U.S. intelligence.By way of example, he described one file from the British GCHQcipher service that he copied, stole, and provided to other parties. Itexposed a legally authorized British operation to collect electronicdata on terrorist matters in Pakistan by tapping into Cisco routersused by telecom companies in Asia. This GCHQ operation, asSnowden knew, violated neither British nor American law. He told aBBC interviewer in regard to that file, “What’s scariest is not whatthe government is doing that’s unlawful, but what they’re doingthat is completely lawful.” So his criteria for taking such documentswere not their illegality. In his five weeks at this Booz Allen job, healso used this same newly acquired “priv ac” at the NSA to steal filesfrom the Israeli, Canadian, and Australian intelligence services.Jumping from one outside contracting firm to another for thepurpose of penetrating other Western intelligence services is notthe conventional mission of a whistle- blower. In the parlance of CIAcounterintelligence, the actions of an employee of an intelligenceservice who changes his jobs solely to steal the more valuable secretsof this service is called an “expanding penetration.” It is not possibleto believe that Snowden did not know the immense damage thatthe highly sensitive documents he was taking from the NSA and itsallies could cause.His choice to switch jobs did not come out of the blue. It was notbased on serendipitously discovering the documents after he beganworking at Booz Allen. As he told Lana Lam, he knew in advancethat by switching to the job at Booz Allen, he would gain the opportunityto take the lists of NSA sources. He knew that the NSA’sEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2789/30/16 8:13 AMSnowden’s Choices | 279secretive National Threat Operations Center’s chief business was, asits name suggests, countering direct threats from China, Russia, andother adversary states and that to deal with these threats, the NSAhad used sophisticated methods to hack into the computers of adversaries.The NSA was even able to remotely gain entry to adversarycomputers that were not hooked into a network. “It’s no secret thatwe hack China very aggressively,” Snowden later said from Moscow.He had a planned target: getting the lists of the enemy computersthat the NSA had hacked into.He also knew he was undertaking a dangerous enterprise. He evenmentioned the possibility that he would be “in an orange jumpsuit,super- max prison in isolation or Guantánamo,” perhaps evenassassinated.He knowingly chose this course presumably because he believedthe value of the secrets he would obtain by switching jobs outweighedthe risk of imprisonment. Or worse. Part of his calculusmight have been the belief that the NSA lists, GCHQ documents,and other material in his possession could give him great leverage, ifhe chose to exert it, in his future dealings with intelligence services(including the NSA). His choice to widen his access was made, if notto get rich, to empower himself.The Second DecisionThe second choice of consequence that Snowden made was to makeHong Kong his first stop. He had many other options. He could haveremained in America, as almost all previous whistle- blowers hadchosen to do. If he did that, he would have to make his case in court(and, in that case, the Level 3 documents he took might have beenretrieved before they fell into unauthorized hands). He could havealso chosen to make an escape to a country that did not have an activeextradition treaty with the United States. He could have, for example,taken a direct flight to Brazil, which has no extradition treatywith the United States. Brazil also had the advantage of being thehome country of Glenn Greenwald, whose cooperation he sought.Snowden could have gone to many other countries without extradi-Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2799/30/16 8:13 AM280 | how america lost its secretstion treaties with the United States. Yet, instead, he flew to HongKong, which had an extradition agreement that had been enforcedthroughout the past decade with Hong Kong courts ordering thearrest of almost every fugitive charged by U.S. authorities. He couldexpect that when the United States filed a criminal complaint, HongKong authorities would seize him and the alleged stolen property ofthe U.S. government in his possession. Even if he were released onbail and successfully defeated extradition in a Hong Kong court, theHong Kong authorities would almost certainly retain all the NSAand GCHQ files he had gone to such lengths to steal.His reason, as he told Greenwald, was that China could providehim with physical protection from any countermeasures by U.S.intelligence agencies such as “American agents . . . breaking downthe door” of the hotel room and seizing him. China also had swayover Hong Kong’s security activities.Hong Kong was therefore merely a protected stopover en route tohis next destination. If he had gone directly to Moscow and providedthe same journalists with the same documents at a press conferencein Moscow, his status as a whistle- blower might have been viewedwith less sympathy in the media. Even The Guardian, for example,might have been reluctant to publish a Moscow- based story revealingBritish and American communications intelligence secrets.The Third DecisionThe third choice Snowden made, and the choice that most effectivelydefined him to the public, was to reveal himself as the man behindthe leak in a video in Hong Kong. He not only identified himself asthe person who stole the government documents published by TheGuardian and The Washington Post but also incriminated himselffurther on camera by allowing Poitras to film him actually disclosingthe NSA’s secret operations to Greenwald. By disclosing classifieddata to Greenwald, an unauthorized person, he intentionally burnedhis bridges.What makes this choice intriguing is that there was no evidentEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2809/30/16 8:13 AMSnowden’s Choices | 281need for him to expose himself in this way. If he merely wanted tobe a whistle- blower, he could have, as Bradley Manning did, anonymouslysent the documents to journalists as “Citizen Four.” In fact,in late May 2013, that was exactly what he did. He anonymouslysent Gellman the PRISM scoop, which the Post published on June 6.He also sent Greenwald and Poitras documents while he was stillthe anonymous Citizen Four. Neither Gellman nor Greenwald hadsuggested the need for a face- to- face meeting with Snowden. Evenafter he had revealed his true identity to Poitras and Greenwald onJune 3, the Guardian editor Ewen MacAskill offered him the optionof remaining an unnamed source for the stories. He said, as he latertold Vanity Fair, “You should remain anonymous; the stories arejust as good without you.” However, anonymity was not part ofSnowden’s long game.The reason he gave Greenwald in Hong Kong for going public inthis way was to avoid having any suspicion fall on his co- workers atthe NSA. Yet in the initial stories published by Greenwald, Poitras,and Gellman, Snowden had not allowed the reporters to identify himby either name or position. If he did not act to deflect suspicion fromhis co- workers for the initial investigation, why do it a week later?In the intervening week, the FBI had already launched its criminalinvestigation. In any case, he did not need to be the subject of a documentaryfilm to take sole responsibility for stealing state secrets. Hecould have simply allowed Greenwald to identify him by name asthe source in the stories.One thing that Snowden could not accomplish by anonymouslytransferring the documents to journalists was a starring role in thedrama. If he had appeared digitally masked in Poitras’s video withan altered voice, he would not achieve fame. To do that, he needed toallow Poitras to film him committing the crime of turning over NSAdocuments to Greenwald. This video was also part of his advanceplanning. Indeed, one reason he chose Poitras was that she was aprizewinning documentary filmmaker. Snowden, while he was stillworking at the NSA in March 2013, made it clear how he intendedto use Poitras’s filmmaking skills. He told her, “My personal desire isthat you paint the target directly on my back.” Making himself theEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2819/30/16 8:13 AM282 | how america lost its secretson- camera star of a twenty- hour- long reality show, edited first intoa video and then a full- length documentary, transformed him in thepublic’s mind into a hero.It would be a mistake to assume that the central role he gavehimself was simply an exercise in narcissism. After the video wasreleased, he was no longer a near nonentity servicing a computersystem at a backwater NSA base in Hawaii. He had emerged fromthe shadowy world of electronic intelligence to become one of themost famous whistle- blowers in modern history. It was a mantlethat would allow him to also become a leading advocate of privacyand encryption rights, as well as the leading opponent of NSA spying.While this remarkable transformation might not have been hisentire motive, it was certainly the result of the choice he made to gopublic.The Fourth DecisionThe final choice he made was to board a nonstop flight to Moscowon June 23. Once the U.S. criminal complaint was unsealed on June21, he needed to leave Hong Kong; his continued presence wouldhave been a complication for the Chinese president, Xi, scheduledsoon to meet President Obama. His only route out of Hong Kongwent through two adversaries of the United States: China and Russia.China, as far as is known, did not offer him sanctuary. Accordingto one U.S. diplomat cited by The New York Times, China might havealready obtained copies of Snowden’s NSA files and did not want theproblem of having Snowden defect to Beijing. In any case, if it hadnot already acquired the files, it could assume it would receive thatintelligence data from its Russian ally in the intelligence war. Whateverits reason, China did not use its considerable power in HongKong to block Snowden’s exit.Nor did Snowden obtain a visa to any country in Latin America orelsewhere during his monthlong stay in Hong Kong. As in the oftcitedSherlock Holmes clue of the dog that did not bark, Snowden’slack of any visas in his passport strongly suggests that he had notmade plans to go anyplace but where he actually went: Moscow. HisEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2829/30/16 8:13 AMSnowden’s Choices | 283actions here, including his contacts with Russian officials in HongKong, speak louder than his words.Just as he believed the Chinese intelligence service could protecthim in Hong Kong from a physical attack by agents of the UnitedStates, he could assume that the FSB could protect him from themin Moscow. He was not entirely naive about its capabilities. Duringhis service in the CIA, he had taken a monthlong training course atthe CIA’s “farm” at Fort Peary, in which counterintelligence officerstaught about the capabilities of the Russian security services. Hecouldn’t have believed that Russia would allow a defector from theNSA who claimed to have had access to the NSA’s sources in Russiaand China to leave Moscow before its security services obtained thatinformation.It is not uncommon for a defector to change sides in order to finda better life for himself in another country. Some defectors flee toescape a repressive government or to find one in which they believethey are more closely attuned to its values. Russia, however, is ordinarilynot the country of choice for someone such as Snowden seekinggreater civil liberties and personal freedom. So why did Snowdenchoose Russia for his new life?The four choices just discussed that Snowden made, taken together,show that Snowden was determined to succeed where othersbefore him had failed. He not only wanted to take full credit forstealing files from the NSA but also wanted to escape any Americanretribution for his act. His decision suggests to me a highly intelligent,carefully calculating man who was hell- bent on finding a newlife for himself in a foreign country. A common thread that runsthrough these four choices is a willingness to do whatever was necessaryto achieve this new life, including disregarding his oath toprotect secrets and instead transporting them on thumb drives toa foreign country. To protect himself, he was also willing to rely onthe influence of adversary intelligence services in Hong Kong andput himself in the hands of Russian authorities in Moscow. He wasalso willing to use some of his classified documents as a medium ofexchange, if not bait, with journalists to get the public attention hesought.These choices paid off for Snowden, the new hero of millions. InEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2839/30/16 8:13 AM284 | how america lost its secretsMoscow, he could enjoy a safe life, free from the threats of a CIArendition team dropping from the sky or extradition proceedings. Hewas now under the protection of Putin’s Russia. The press had a fieldday with the domestic surveillance documents that he gave them. Asfar as Snowden was concerned, as he told Gellman on December 21,2013, in Moscow, “The mission’s already accomplished.”Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2849/30/16 8:13 AMc h a p t e r 28The Espionage SourceThe government’s investigation failed. [It] didn’t know what wastaken.— edward snowden, Moscow, 2014In moscow, I had learned that Russian intelligence services usethe broad, umbrella term “espionage source” to describe moles,volunteers, and anyone else who delivers another state’s secretsto it. It applies not only to documents but to the secret knowledgethat such a source is able to recall and includes both controlled anduncontrolled bearers of secrets. It is also a job description that fitEdward Snowden in June 2013.Unless one is willing to believe that the Putin regime acted out ofpurely altruistic motives in exfiltrating this American intelligenceworker to Moscow, the only plausible explanation for its actionsin Hong Kong was that it recognized Snowden’s potential as anespionage source. Snowden’s open disillusionment with the NSApresented the very situation that the Russian intelligence servicesspecialized in exploiting. He had also revealed to reporters in HongKong that he had deliberately gained access to the NSA’s sourcesand methods and that he had taken highly classified documents toHong Kong. He further disclosed that before leaving the NSA, heEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2859/30/16 8:13 AM286 | how america lost its secretshad gained access to the lists of computers that the NSA had penetratedin foreign countries. He even went so far as to describe tothese journalists the secrets that he had taken as a “single point offailure” for the NSA. And aside from the documents he had copied,he claimed that the secret knowledge in his head, if he disclosed it,would wreak havoc on U.S. intelligence. “If I were providing informationthat I know, that’s in my head, to some foreign government,the US intelligence community would . . . see sources go dark thatwere previously productive,” he told the editor of The Guardian inMoscow.In short, he advertised possessing priceless data that the Russianintelligence services had been seeking, with little success, forthe past six decades. These electronic files could provide it with thekeys to unlock the NSA’s entire kingdom of electronic spying. Couldany world- class intelligence service ignore such a prize? To miss theopportunity to get its hands on such a potential espionage sourcewould be nothing short of gross negligence.In fact, this golden opportunity was not missed in Hong Kong.Even if the Russian intelligence service had not previously hadhim in its sights— which, as discussed earlier, appears to me to beextremely unlikely— he made contact with Russian officials in HongKong, and Putin personally approved allowing Snowden to come toRussia.This decision made it possible for Snowden, without an entryvisa to Russia, or, for that matter, any other country, to check inand board an Aeroflot flight to Moscow. We also know that a specialoperation was mounted to take Snowden off the plane once it landedin Moscow. Such an operation could not have been executed withoutadvance planning. Nor would he be removed from the plane withouta plan for his stay in Russia. Once Putin approved it, there is littlereason to doubt that the plans to get Snowden to Moscow, and whatevercover stories were deemed necessary to obscure them, had beencarried out professionally by Russia’s special services.When an intelligence service makes such elaborate preparationsfor extracting a foreign intelligence worker, it presumably alsoexpects to debrief him or her on arrival. Pelton, for example, whohad access to far less valuable information than had Snowden, wasEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2869/30/16 8:13 AMThe Espionage Source | 287held incommunicado in Vienna for two weeks during his debriefing.It would be inconceivable for an intelligence service to bringa potential espionage source such as Snowden to Russia and allowhim to catch the next plane to Latin America. The false report providedto the press that Snowden was flying there was likely nothingmore than a smoke screen to confuse foreign observers while he wasreceiving his initial debriefing and evaluation.When it comes to the esoteric enterprise of reconstructing thework of U.S. communications intelligence, military as well as civilianexperts in cryptology, computer sciences, and communications arenecessary. Unlike in the case of Pelton, Snowden, according to AnatolyKucherena, had secret material in his possession. Even if Russianintelligence had already acquired copies of the electronic filesprior to Snowden’s arrival in Moscow, Snowden’s interpretation ofthem would be part of the debriefing because intelligence data needsto be put in context.“This debriefing could not be done overnight,” according to a formerhigh- ranking officer in the GRU, the Russian military intelligenceservice. “There is no way that Snowden would not be fullydebriefed,” he said. He also said GRU specialists in signals intelligencewould be called in.Putin’s approval of the Snowden operation was not without consequences.Not only did Obama make good on his threat to cancelthe pre- Olympics summit with Putin, but also, as it turned out,the Snowden exfiltration proved a turning point in the “reset” ofU.S.- Russian relations. Having to accept the onus of declining relationswith the Obama administration, Putin, it seems safe to assume,attempted to get the bonus of the NSA’s communications intelligencefrom Snowden. The GRU, the SVR, and other Russian intelligenceservices would not stop questioning Snowden, even if it tookyears, until they had squeezed out of him whatever state secrets hehad. Because Snowden was rewarded with sanctuary, a residence, andbodyguards, there is no reason to doubt that he refused to accommodatehis hosts. While he might continue to see himself as a whistlebloweron a supranational scale, as far as Russian intelligence wasconcerned, he was an espionage source.For an intelligence service, the game is not over when it obtainsEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2879/30/16 8:13 AM288 | how america lost its secretsstate secrets. It still needs to fog over the extent of its coup, as saidearlier, to prolong the value of the espionage. Hence it is likely thatthe story that Snowden had thoroughly destroyed all the stolendata in the month prior to departing for Russia, as well as the storythat he had turned down all requests to be questioned by the FSBand other Russian intelligence officials, was part of the legend constructedfor him. The repetitions of these uncorroborated claims inhis press interviews might also have enhanced his public image forthe ACLU effort to get clemency for him. Even so, in view of theimportance of such communications intelligence to Russia, it wouldbe the height of naïveté for U.S. or British intelligence to accept suchclaims as anything more than camouflage.As for Snowden’s motive, I see no reason to doubt his explanationthat he stole NSA documents to expose its surveillance becausehe believed that it was an illicit intrusion into the privacy of individuals.Such disaffection is not a unique situation in the intelligencebusiness. Many of Russia’s worldwide espionage sources beforeSnowden were also dissatisfied employees who had access to classifiedsecrets. Like some of them, Snowden used his privileged accessto reveal what he considered the improper activities of the organizationfor which he worked. In that sense, I fully accept that he beganas a whistle- blower, not as a spy. It was also as a whistle- blower thathe contacted Laura Poitras, Glenn Greenwald, and Barton Gellman,who published the scoops he provided in Der Spiegel, The Guardian,and The Washington Post.Snowden’s penetration went beyond whistle- blowing, however.In the vast number of files he copied were documents that containedthe NSA’s most sensitive sources and methods that had little if anythingto do with domestic surveillance or whistle- blowing.Snowden could not have acted entirely alone. It will be recalledthat the deepest part of his penetration was during the five weekshe worked at the National Threat Operations Center in Hawaii asa contract employee of Booz Allen Hamilton. It was there that hecopied Level 3 files, including the so- called road map to the gapsin American intelligence. During this period, Snowden had neitherthe passwords nor the system administrator’s privileges that wouldEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2889/30/16 8:13 AMThe Espionage Source | 289allow him to copy, transfer, and steal the electronic files. He thereforemust have obtained that assistance from someone who had thepasswords and privileges. Other workers there might have sharedhis sensibilities and antipathy toward NSA surveillance. It thereforeseems entirely plausible that he found a co- worker willing tocooperate or, vice versa, a co- worker found him. Snowden mightnot have been aware of his new accomplice’s true motives or affiliations,but without some co- worker’s providing him with entry tothe sealed- off computers, he could not have carried out the penetration.To our knowledge, whoever helped him evidently did not wantto expose himself to prosecution or defect from the NSA. That wasSnowden’s role. By accepting the sole blame in the video that Poitrasmade about him in Hong Kong, Snowden shielded anyone else fromsuspicion, which was, as he told Poitras, his purpose. Whoever helpedhim may still be working at the NSA.To be sure, there remains that other glaring gap in the chain ofevents that led Snowden to Moscow: his whereabouts and activitiesduring his first eleven days in Hong Kong. Mike Rogers, thechairman of the House Select Committee on Intelligence, even suggested,without any evidence, that Snowden might have been takento mainland China during this period. What drove his speculationwas the admission of U.S. intelligence that despite its vast globalresources for searching credit card charges, banking transactions,hotel registrations, e- mails, police records, and even CCTV cameras,neither it nor its allies were able to find a trace of Snowden duringthat time. It was, in a phrase made famous by the former secretaryof defense Donald Rumsfeld, “a known unknown.” Just as likely hecould have been staying in a well- prepared safe house anywhere inHong Kong or even at the home of an unknown associate. All that isreally known is that soon after he emerged from this venue, movedto the Mira hotel, and gave his celebrated interview to journalists, hewas safely settled in Russia.Snowden’s actions appear squarely at odds with his assertions ofserving his country’s interests. Even accepting that he began with asincere desire to be a world- class whistle- blower, his mission evolved,deliberately or not, into one that led him to disclose key communica-Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2899/30/16 8:13 AM290 | how america lost its secretstions intelligence secrets to a foreign power with an agenda that ishardly aligned with his country’s interests. A defector is defined inthe Cambridge English Dictionary as “a person who leaves his or herown country or group to join an opposing one.” Snowden’s actionsfit that description. In the end, it is Snowden’s actions, not his words,that matter.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2909/30/16 8:13 AMc h a p t e r 29The “War on Terror” After SnowdenBecause of a number of unauthorized disclosures and a lot ofhand- wringing over the government’s role in the effort to try touncover these terrorists, there have been some policy and legaland other actions that make our ability collectively, internationally,to find these terrorists much more challenging.— cia director john brennan,in response to the Paris terrorist attack, November 2015On the evening of November 13, 2015, nine jihadist terroristsacting on behalf of ISIS brought normal life in Paris to ascreeching halt. Three suicide bombers blew themselves up at thestadium at Saint- Denis while President Hollande was inside attendinga match between France and Germany. Other terrorists thatnight killed 130 people at cafés, restaurants, and a theater. Threehundred and eighty- eight others were wounded in the carnage.Abdelhamid Abaaoud, a twenty- eight- year- old Belgian citizen ofMoroccan origins who served ISIS as a logistics officer in Syria in2014, planned the attack over many months with the help of othersin Syria. To organize it, they smuggled three suicide bombers intoEurope through Greece, raised financing, set up a base in the Molenbeeksection of Brussels, imported deactivated assault weapons fromSlovenia that were restored by a technician, bought ammunition,acquired suicide vests, obtained “burner” cell phones, rented cars,and, two months before the attack, rented three additional apartmentsunder fake identities to conceal the operation. Finally, inEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2919/30/16 8:13 AM292 | how america lost its secretsNovember, they made online bookings for quarters in Paris for thenine attackers. Even though Abaaoud was well- known to Westernintelligence services, none of the communications surrounding thepreparations for the attack came to the attention of the NSA or itsallied services in Europe. A critical find for the investigators enabledthem to unravel the chain that eventually led them to the perpetrators,but it had nothing to do with electronic surveillance. A cellphone belonging to one of them was found by the security forces,following a broad search they conducted, which included trash canssituated in the vicinity of the concert halls. So this breakthrough inthe investigation had nothing to do with systematic data analysisconducted prior to the attack.Indeed, in the sequence of the Paris events, as in other terrorevents, the challenge is not just bringing culprits to justice. It is preventingthe terrorists from carrying out their attack to begin with.Police cannot constantly protect “soft targets” such as restaurants,cafés, theaters, and street gatherings. The only practical means bywhich a government can prevent such attacks is to learn in advancetheir planning and preparations. One means of acquiring this informationis by listening in on the channels through which membersof loosely knit terrorist organizations, such as ISIS, communicate.This form of intelligence gathering obviously works best so longas the terrorists remain unaware that the communication channelsthey are using are being monitored. Once they find out that theirmessages and conversations are being intercepted, they will likelyfind a safer means to communicate important information. For thatreason, communications intelligence organizations keep the sourcesand methods they employ for monitoring these channels in a tightlysealed envelope of secrecy.Yet, in June 2013, the NSA found that envelope had been breachedby Snowden, who knowingly compromised three programs that itused to keep track of terrorist organizations around the world. Thefirst system he divulged, and the one that received the most publicattention, was what the NSA called the “215” program because ithad been authorized by Section 215 of the Patriot Act of 2001. Thisprogram compiled the billing records of every phone call made inAmerica. The data included the number called and the duration ofEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2929/30/16 8:13 AMThe “War on Terror” After Snowden | 293the call but not the name of the caller. This anonymous data wasarchived into a huge database. The idea was that when any foreigneron the FBI’s watch list of terrorists called any number in the UnitedStates, the FBI could trace that person’s entire chain of telephonecontacts to try to determine if he or she was connected to a knownterrorist cell. There was, however, a major flaw in this program: itdid not cover e- mail and other Internet messaging, which by 2013had largely replaced telephone calls. In addition, terrorist organizations,after the tracking down of Osama bin Laden in 2011, hadbecome fully aware of the vulnerability of telephoning overseas. Soalthough the NSA could cite a handful of early successes that “215”yielded, Snowden’s exposure of it did only limited damage.Snowden did vastly more damage by revealing the PRISM program,also called “702” because it was authorized in 2008 by Section702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. Its effectivenessproceeded from the misplaced confidence that terrorist organizationsin Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, and Pakistan had in the encryption andother safeguards used by giant Internet companies, such as Apple,Google, Twitter, and WhatsApp. They evidently had not knownthat in 2007 the NSA found a way to intercept this data before itwas encrypted. The Internet, despite metaphors such as “the cloud”and “cyberspace,” initially travels through fiber cables, almost all ofwhich run through the United States and its Five Eyes allies. So by2013 the NSA was able to access 91 percent of the Internet beforeit was encrypted. This so- called upstream data included Googlesearches, tweets on Twitter, social media postings, Skype conversations,messages on Xbox Live, instant messages sent over WhatsApp,and e- mails sent via the Internet. The NSA could also read concealedmessages in photographs and online game moves. According to adeclassified 2015 inspector general’s analysis, the actual interceptionsin this program in 2013 were mainly limited to the communicationsof preselected foreign terrorists.Until the Snowden breach was revealed on June 6, 2013, this programgave U.S. intelligence a valuable tool for gathering unexpectedintelligence. Snowden must have been aware of how highly the NSAvalued this program because, according to the documents he released,PRISM was “the number one source of raw intelligence used forEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2939/30/16 8:13 AM294 | how america lost its secretsNSA analytic reports.” From the continued use of these interceptedchannels by suspected terrorists on the NSA’s watch lists, it couldbe reasonably assumed that these users were unaware of the NSA’scapacity to intercept their messages on the unencrypted Internet.Unlike the telephone program that Snowden revealed, the PRISMprogram produced actionable intelligence until the time whenSnowden blew it. General Hayden, who was NSA director duringthe three years following the 9/11 attack, wrote that these surveillancepowers, among other things, “uncovered illicit financing networks,detected suspect travel, discovered ties to aviation schools,linked transportation employees to associates of terrorists, drewconnections to the illicit purchases of arms, tied U.S. persons to KhalidSheikh Mohammed, and discovered a suspect terrorist on theno-fly list who was already in the United States.” More specifically,just between 2007 and 2013, according to the testimony of NSA andFBI officials, it resulted in the preempting of at least forty-five terroristattacks. Almost all of the thwarted attacks occurred outsidethe jurisdiction of the United States, and therefore did not result inU.S. prosecutions. One of the plots that targeted Americans was aplanned attack using high explosives on the subways in Grand Centralstation and the Times Square station at rush hour in New YorkCity in 2009. It was averted after British intelligence supplied theNSA with the e- mail address of the terrorist suspect Najibullah Zaziin Aurora, Colorado. The PRISM surveillance program then traced itto an IP address on the watch list associated with Rashid Rauf, an al-Qaeda bomb maker in Pakistan. Zazi, evidently unaware that e- mailssent via Yahoo! could be intercepted before they were encryptedby Yahoo!, continued sending e- mails to Rauf as he prepared toassemble the bombs in early September 2009. As a result, the NSAsearch of its database yielded e- mails from Zazi discussing the proportionsof explosives to be used. These e- mails recovered throughthe PRISM program, according to an analysis done for the SenateJudiciary Committee in 2014, provided the “critical lead” that led tothe arrest of Zazi and his confederates before they could detonatebombs in the subways of New York City. The members of the Houseand Senate Select Committees on Intelligence had no doubt that the702 program played a key role in aborting this plot they had beenEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 2949/30/16 11:09 AMThe “War on Terror” After Snowden | 295secretly briefed on in 2009. Dianne Feinstein, the chair of the SenateSelect Committee, pointed out with privileged knowledge that itsaved “subway cars stuffed to the gunwales with people”; RepresentativeMike Rogers also spoke with privileged knowledge when hesaid on June 9, 2013, referring to the 702 program, “I can tell you inthe Zazi case in New York, it’s exactly the program that was used.”The third NSA program of interest to terrorists that Snowdenrevealed was called XKeyscore. Using Internet data from PRISM, theNSA had created the equivalent of digital fingerprints for suspectedforeign terrorists on watch lists. The “fingerprint” for each suspectwas based on his or her search pattern on the Internet. These algorithmsmade it difficult for suspects to hide on the Internet by usingaliases. Once a suspect was “fingerprinted,” any attempt to evadesurveillance by using a different computer and another user namewould be detected by the XKeyscore algorithms. The “fingerprints”only worked so long as XKeyscore remained secret from those onthe watch list. After Snowden exposed it, suspects could evade surveillanceby changing their search patterns when they changed theiraliases.Further enabling furtive Internet users to evade the surveillanceof the government, Snowden offered specific tips about the secretsources and methods used by both the NSA and the British GCHQ.He revealed in a public interview, for example, that the GCHQhad deployed the first “full- take” Internet interceptor that “snarfseverything, in a rolling buffer to allow retroactive investigationwithout missing a single bit.” When asked how to circumvent it,he replied, “You should never route through or peer with the UKunder any circumstances. Their fibers are radioactive, and even theQueen’s selfies to the pool boy get logged.” Aside from this warningabout using Internet providers whose wiring passes through Britain,he also warned Internet users about trusting the encryption of anyU.S.- based Internet company because of their secret relationshipswith the NSA. He added that the NSA considered “telecom collaboratorsto be the jewels in their crown of omniscience.” He also gave awarning about the attention the NSA was paying to “jihadi forums.”He said that to avoid being automatically “targeted” by the NSA,one needed to avoid them.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2959/30/16 8:13 AM296 | how america lost its secretsThese precise tips for evading U.S. and British surveillance werenot accidentally leaked. Snowden supplied them in written answersto interrogatives sent to him by Poitras and Appelbaum in May2013 while he was still on the NSA payroll. He also carefully orchestratedthe exposure of the PRISM surveillance programs, preciselyspecifying, as Greenwald writes in his book No Place to Hide, whowas to release the “scoops” in which newspapers. He gave Gellman aseventy- two- hour ultimatum for exposing PRISM, as we know. Hefurther provided Poitras with well- organized files for publicationsrevealing, among other things, that the NSA had paid RSA, a leadingcomputer security provider, to build flawed encryption protocols,which allowed the NSA to read encrypted messages on computersand online video games. In short, he used these journalists to accomplishhis purpose. In light of the way he micromanaged the leaks, it isdifficult to conclude that he did not deliberately plan to compromiseand render useless these U.S. and British operations.Whatever he intended, he clearly succeeded in blowing the coveroff NSA’s operations authorized under the Foreign Intelligence SurveillanceAct for monitoring terrorists’ activities. After all, terroristgroups are no different from other criminal enterprises in their needto keep their communications secret from the authorities pursuingthem. If they find out that the police are tapping their phone lines orintercepting other channels of communication, they can be expectedto either stop using them or use them to divert attention away fromtheir real plans.In addition, Snowden suggested an alternative means to those whowanted to evade government surveillance. He recommended thatthey use end- to- end encryption, which results in messages beingencrypted before they are sent over the Internet. He told Greenwald,for example, that encryption was “critically necessary” for anyoneto evade NSA surveillance. Just as Robert Hanssen had deliberatelycompromised the NSA’s interception of Soviet communications inWashington, D.C., in the 1990s, Snowden deliberately compromisedthe NSA’s interception of concealed messages by potential terroristson the Internet. We cannot know whether or not any of the jihadistsinvolved in subsequent terrorist attacks (such as those in Paris orSan Bernardino, California, in 2015) would have used the InternetEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2969/30/16 8:13 AMThe “War on Terror” After Snowden | 297or phone lines more freely if Snowden had not divulged the NSA’ssurveillance of them, but there can be little doubt that his breachof the secrecy envelope had serious consequences for U.S., French,and British intelligence. For example, François Molins, the formerhead prosecutor of Paris, pointed out that after the Paris attacks theFrench investigation had run into an obstacle: end- to- end encryption.“We can’t penetrate into certain conversations,” he said about“Telegram,” the end- to- end encryption program that Snowden hadrepeatedly recommended, and as a result “we’re dealing with thisgigantic black hole, a dark zone where there are just so many dangerousthings going on.”The effects of Snowden’s intervention were soon realized by theCIA, according to Michael Morell, who had closely followed intelligenceabout terrorist groups in the Middle East ever since he hadacted as the CIA’s briefer for the president on the day of the 9/11attack. “Terrorist organizations around the world were already startingto modify their actions in light of what Snowden disclosed,”Morell wrote in 2015. “Within weeks of the [Snowden] leaks, communicationssources dried up, tactics were changed.” Even moredisturbing, suspects on the CIA’s watch list began switching to an“encryption platform.” Instead of continuing to rely on the Internetto protect their messages, they increased their use of end- to- endencryption, which defeated the effectiveness of PRISM’s capturingInternet traffic before it was encrypted by Internet companies.Indeed, after the Snowden breach, ISIS even provided a tutorial onits websites about using end- to- end encryption. So Morell and othersat the CIA helplessly watched as this previous source of unexpectedintelligence went dark.What further heightened Morell’s concern about this sudden lossof NSA intelligence from these sources was the discovery by theCIA in January 2014 of two documents, one 26 pages and the other19 pages, on a captured ISIS computer in Syria. These documentsdiscussed the advantages of using bubonic plague germs and otherbiological weapons against Western civilian populations. They evenprovided a religious justification for using biological warfare againstcivilian targets in the West. In addition, evidence uncovered fromthe safe house used by the ISIS terrorists involved in the Paris attackEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2979/30/16 8:13 AM298 | how america lost its secretssuggested they had been interested in acquiring radioactive isotopes.Without the advance warning that the NSA’s surveillance of the preencryptedInternet had provided in the past, could the CIA now contendwith such unconventional threats?The NSA also saw its sources disappearing from its surveillance.Before the Snowden breach, the FBI, the CIA, and the DIA, whichwere the NSA’s partners in the PRISM program, had compiled awatch list of highly active foreign terrorist targets for the NSA’sPRISM program. These “targets” included logistics officers, bombbuilders, weapons specialists, and suicide bomber recruiters. UntilJune 6, 2013, many of these targets had frequently used Internetservices, such as Twitter, Facebook, and Xbox Live, to send what theybelieved would be hidden messages. After the PRISM story brokein The Washington Post on June 6, the NSA “saw one after anothertarget go dark,” according to a senior NSA executive involved inthat surveillance. The NSA has watched about one thousand ofthese targets take “steps to remove themselves from our visibility.”According to the NSA’s deputy director, Richard Ledgett, in 2016,the vanishings included a group planning attacks in Europe and theUnited States.Admiral Rogers, the new NSA director, was asked about the damagedone by Snowden. He was blunt and direct. Asked in February2015 whether or not the disclosures by Snowden had reduced theNSA’s ability to pursue terrorists, he answered, “Have I lost capabilitythat we had prior to the revelations? Yes.”Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2989/30/16 8:13 AMEpilogueThe Snowden EffectGovernments can reduce our dignity to something like that oftagged animals.— edward snowden, Moscow, 2016The enormous effect that Snowden has had on America canbe divided into three categories: the good, the bad, and the ugly.The good proceeds from the national conversation on the issue ofsurveillance in 2013 that his disclosures ignited. There is no denyingthat Snowden’s dramatic disclosures, despite the damage they did toU.S. intelligence, accomplished a salutary service in alerting both thepublic and the government to the potential danger of a surveillanceleviathan. The steady expansion of the NSA’s collection of telephonebilling records under the cloak of secrecy, for example, revealed abureaucratic mission creep that badly needed to be brought undercloser oversight by Congress. Snowden’s breach provided anotherbenefit. It pointed to the security dangers proceeding from the NSA’sheadlong rush to outsource its computer servicing to private contractors.Opening this back door, as Snowden amply demonstrated,greatly increased the risk that America’s secrets would fall into thehands of its enemies. An intelligence service has little if any value ifit cannot keep secret its sources from its adversaries.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 2999/30/16 8:13 AM300 | how america lost its secretsThe conversation that Snowden began is necessary for anotherreason. The relentless growth of data- collection technology hadcome to endanger personal privacy. Smart phones in our pockets,GPS recorders in our cars, fitness bands on our wrists, CCTV monitorsin stores, and network- connected devices in our homes leave adigital trail of every move we make. The government can subpoenaas part of an investigation, as we know, our personal data, includingour Internet searches, social media postings, electronic communications,and credit card records. In addition, the government has itsown tools of surveillance. Snowden, by disclosing that the governmentwas vacuuming in phone billing records and Internet activities,hit a sore spot in the public’s consciousness. How far did thesurveillance state extend? Did an Orwellian government interceptprivate conversations of American citizens? Should Apple, Google,and other Internet giants use a doomsday system of encryption toprevent court- ordered searches for data? Were there adequate safeguardsagainst government snooping?In popular culture, surveillance is often associated with the sinistermeasures taken by a totalitarian government to suppress individualdissidence. On television we see government agents in blackvans operating arrays of tape recorders, following people on thestreet, and breaking into homes to steal files and tap telephone lines.In the 2006 Academy Award– winning film The Lives of Others, forexample, East Germany’s Stasi police use listening devices to gatherinformation to blackmail intellectuals to assist in the eradication ofdissent. East Germany was not the only place in the Cold War erausing surveillance to suppress dissent. Even in the United Statesin the 1950s and 1960s, J. Edgar Hoover’s FBI bugged the phonesof civil rights leaders, including Martin Luther King Jr., to root outsuspected subversive elements. Most Americans viewed this as areprehensible use of government surveillance, and the very mentionof the word, even before Snowden’s disclosure, evoked disquietamong the public. But what Snowden exposed was not any sort ofrogue operation but programs authorized by the president and Congressand approved by fifteen federal judges. If one accepts that thenation’s security remains a legitimate function of government, theEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 3009/30/16 8:13 AMEpilogue | 301issue is not surveillance itself; it is the proper way such surveillanceis conducted.The NSA surveillance of telephone records that Snowden exposedwas different in its intent from the surveillance of the Cold War. Itstarget was a selected list of 300 to 400 foreign jihadists living abroad.Many of these individuals residing in Syria, Iraq, and Pakistan hadbeen identified by the FBI and the CIA as active bomb makers, assassins,and weapon specialists. This was not domestic surveillance, butwhen any of these suspects telephoned a phone number in the UnitedStates, the NSA checked the billing records of the domestic phonenumber that had been called to determine all the calls emanatingfrom it. The purpose of this search was to assemble for the FBI a listof contacts that a foreign suspect might have in the United States. Toexpedite this task, it obtained from telephone companies the billingrecords, without any names attached, of all their users and storedthem in a single archive under its control. While this surveillancetargeted foreign terrorists, not domestic dissent, the bulk collectionof phone records had the potential for more nefarious use, a dangerthat Snowden brought to the public’s attention. As a result, Congressmodified the Patriot Act so that billing records would remainon the computers of the phone companies for a limited time ratherthan on those of the NSA. The NSA could still search them afterobtaining an order from the FISA court, though it could not archivethe data for future use, so little harm to individual privacy could bedone. Snowden deserves a large share of the credit not only for thischange but for making the public aware of domestic surveillance.The bad part of the equation is that Snowden deeply damaged anintelligence system that American presidents have relied on for oversix decades. The heart of that system was the sources and methodsused to intercept other nations’ communications. Until Snowden, theNSA’s wall of secrecy kept these nations from knowing about themor, in some cases, even realizing that they were vulnerable to interception.For example, as previously discussed, the NSA had developedthe remarkable ability to tap into an adversary nation’s computers,Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 3019/30/16 8:13 AM302 | how america lost its secretseven though they had been isolated from any network. This innovationhad provided President Obama and his national security teaman edge of which our adversaries were unaware from 2008 to 2013.However, Snowden deliberately nullified this advantage in 2013 byrevealing this technology (which was published in The New YorkTimes and other newspapers). The vast number of documents thathe compromised contained many other secret sources and methods.The full extent of the damage Snowden did may never be fullyknown, even though the Department of Defense spent the betterpart of a year, and tens of thousands of investigative man- hours,trying to sort out just the compromised sources and methods pertainingto military and cyber- defense operations. In addition to thedirect and significant cost to taxpayers represented by this investigation,one measure of how serious the loss has been was revealed byMichael McConnell, the vice- chairman of the company for whichSnowden had worked at the time of the breach. McConnell statedpublicly, “Snowden has compromised more capability than any spyin U.S. history.” McConnell had no obvious reason to exaggerate theloss because his company, Booz Allen Hamilton, was partly responsiblefor the damage. It hired Snowden, as will be recalled, even afterits vetters had detected an untruthful statement in his application.McConnell said, “This will have impact on our ability to do ourmission for the next twenty to thirty years.” By any measure, twodecades of lost intelligence is a steep price to pay.To be sure, the practical value of peacetime intelligence aboutthe activities of adversary states is not always evident. What is farclearer to the public is the value of intelligence that can thwart terroristattacks against subways, theaters, and other civilian targets.We have seen that Snowden also deprived the NSA of much of theeffectiveness of its PRISM program by revealing it, through the articlespublished at his specific behest in The Guardian and The WashingtonPost that explained how it worked. This single revelationcompromised a system, duly authorized by Congress and the president,that had been the government’s single most effective tool forlearning in advance about attacks in America and Europe by jihadistterrorists.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 3029/30/16 8:13 AMEpilogue | 303The ugly part of the equation is the rampant growth of the public’sdistrust of the institutions of government in America. Accordingto recent polls, 4 out of 5 Americans distrust the government.Snowden did not create this new age of distrust, but his disclosuresgreatly contributed to it, as well as to the worldwide distrust of theU.S. government. This post- Snowden distrust is especially powerfulin the section of the international media that assisted Snowden inhis release of NSA documents. In defending Snowden, it questionsthe truthfulness of any government official or member of Congresswho discloses information contradicting Snowden’s claims or showingthat there was some benefit to the multibillion- dollar intelligencesystem that he compromised. Even Senator Dianne Feinstein,who herself fought the secrecy of the CIA for years, was not exemptfrom such distrust when she asserted in June 2013 that the programthat Snowden had compromised had helped avert a bloody carnageon the New York subways in September 2009, as mentioned earlier.That she was the ranking Democrat on the Senate Select Committeeon Intelligence, and briefed on the program at the time of the attack,did not prevent a distrustful press from attempting to impeach hercredibility and that of the fourteen other members of the SenateSelect Committee and the twenty members of the House SelectCommittee on Intelligence who had affirmed her assertion.In this culture of distrust, any claim that any of the secrets thatSnowden disclosed could have caused any harm is preemptively dismissedas government propaganda. Snowden’s word also is takenover that of government officials because, as The Nation explained,Snowden speaks “truth to power.” Such a formulation of distrustallows those who accept it to dismiss all assertions of governmentofficials representing power who contradict Snowden’s version ofreality. Such is Snowden’s glorified aura that even when his revelationsexpose purported U.S. government actions in foreign lands,including the alleged tapping of friendly government officials’ conversations,such as Angela Merkel’s, these are implicitly conflatedwith the NSA’s domestic surveillance program, around which aEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 3039/30/16 8:13 AM304 | how america lost its secretspopular movement has emerged questioning its purpose and methods.As a result, a legitimate debate on what should constitute ourdomestic liberties— and potential limits to those when facing significantsecurity concerns— has largely obfuscated in this mind- setthe reality of Snowden’s weakening, durably and structurally, thecritical ability of the United States and its allies to address theirmounting external security challenges. In this culture of distrust,whatever contradicts the innocent whistle- blower narrative can bepreemptively dismissed because Snowden, even though he remainsensconced in Moscow at an unknown location, remains the ultimatetruth teller.I do not accept either this formulation of Snowden or his versionof the events in which he was the hero. Opening a Pandora’s box ofgovernment secrets is a dangerous undertaking. Whether Snowden’stheft of state secrets proceeded from an idealistic attempt to right awrong, a narcissistic drive to obtain personal recognition, an intent toweaken the foundations of the surveillance infrastructure in whichhe worked, or a combination of such factors, by the time he arrivedin Moscow, it had evolved, deliberately or not, but necessarily, intoa mission of disclosing key national secrets to a foreign power. Inthe end, such conjectures about Snowden’s motives matter less thanthat he was helped, consciously or not, by others with interests thatdiffered from those of the United States. The effects on America ofsuch a massive breach of confidence might not easily be reversible.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 3049/30/16 8:13 AMAcknowledgmentsI am deeply grateful to the many individuals who put their knowledgeand expertise at my disposal during the course of writing thisbook. Unfortunately, I cannot give due credit to some of those peopleto whom I owe the greatest debt in understanding the intelligenceissues, because they spoke to me on condition that I keep secret theiridentities.I greatly benefited from the insights, erudition, and criticisms providedby those who read draft chapters at various stages of my investigation.I am particularly indebted in this regard to Tobias Brown,Rachelle Bergstein, Richard Bernstein, Sidney Blumenthal, DavidBraunschvig, Ash Carter, Susana Duncan, Joe Finder, Ben Gerson,Andrew Hacker, William Haseltine, Eli Jacobs, Bruce Kovner, RobertLoomis, Gary Lucas, John Micklethwait, Frederick Mocatta, AndrewRosenberg, Curt Sawyer, Sean Wilentz, and Ezra Zilkha.I am especially grateful to Harold Edgar, the Julius Silver Professorin Law, Science, and Technology at Columbia Law School; andto Jack Goldsmith, Henry L. Shattuck Professor at Harvard LawSchool, for sharing with me their legal perspective on the espionagestatutes and other legal issues.I thank Edward Lucas of The Economist for recommendingCatherine A. FitzPatrick, a writer and translator at The Interpretermagazine as someone who “posseses a unique knowledge of the labyrinthineworld of Russian disinformation.” She proved a godsendfor this book. With her deep understanding of the workings of theInternet, she helped me retrieve information from the dark side ofthe Internet that I would otherwise would not have found.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 3059/30/16 11:09 AM306 | AcknowledgmentsBecause I do not believe an investigative book should be writtenwithout the author visiting the crime scene and other pertinent venues,I undertook research in Hawaii, Japan, Hong Kong, and Moscow.Where possible, I flew the same flights that Snowden did. I am gratefulto Ena and Ines Talakic for their assistance on these research trips.As talented documentarians in their own right, they filmed a numberof my interviews on these trips, and generously provided photographsfor this book. I thank Alexander Bitter in Hawaii, Joyce Xuin Hong Kong, Ko Shoiya in Japan, and Zamir Gotta, Natalie Filkina,and Svetlana Chervonnaya in Russia for their help in arranging myinterviews in those places. I also owe special thanks to Nick Grube,an editor at Civil Beat in Honolulu, for accompanying me to theNSA base where Snowden was working in 2013.I am indebted to Nancy Novick for her skill, patience and enterprisein helping me find the selection of photographs for this book.I am grateful to Zachary Gresham for his meticulous fact- checkingand proofreading, and to Ingrid Sterner for her immensely helpfulcopyediting skills. Because I perform all my own research, I alone amresponsible for any errors that appear in this book.Mort Janklow, who has represented me for three decades, did asuperb job in arranging for Alfred A. Knopf to publish this book.I am thankful to Julia Ringo and the team at Knopf for their helpin preparing this book. Finally, I am deeply indebted to JonathanSegal for meticulously editing this book. The manuscript gainedimmeasurably from both his keen eye and his wise judgment.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 3069/30/16 8:13 AMNotesprologue Snowden’s Trail: Hong Kong, 20143 “No Such Agency”: The best description of the birth of the NSA can be found inBamford, Puzzle Palace, 1–4.4 the NSA learned: General Keith Alexander, interview with author.4 twelve-minute video: This video can be seen at http://www.theguardian.com/world/video/2013/jun/09/nsa-whistleblower-edward-snowden-interview-video. All of the dozens of videos Snowden made after this initial one can beviewed in chronological order at https://nsa.gov1.info/dni/snowden.html.5 I had written several books: My book Inquest examined the failure of the FBI,the Secret Service, and the CIA to establish the context of the John F. Kennedyassassination. This interest continued in other books of mine, including Deception,in which I investigated the vulnerability of intelligence services involved inespionage during the Cold War, and Agency of Fear (New York: G. P. Putnam’sSons, 1977), in which I explored intelligence failures of domestic intelligence inthe war on drugs.5 extradite Trent Martin: The FBI press statement on this case was releasedon March 27, 2013, less than two months before Snowden bought his ticketfor Hong Kong: https://www.fbi.gov/newyork/press-releases/2013/australian-research-analyst-extradited-on-insider-trading-charges.6 “It’s very mysterious”: Hayden, interview with author.6 My first surprise: I interviewed six members of the Mira staff, all of whom askedme not to identify them. Te-Ping Chen, a journalist for the Asian edition ofThe Wall Street Journal, received similar replies when she interviewed Mirahotel employees the day Snowden left the Mira. Chen and Brown, “Snowden’sOptions for Refuge Narrow.”6 to send Greenwald: Greenwald’s description of his encounters with Snowdenis taken mainly from chapter 1, “Contact,” and chapter 2, “Ten Days in HongKong,” in Greenwald, No Place to Hide, 7–32.7 Snowden also contacted: Gellman, “Code Name ‘Verax.’ ”7 He proposed we meet: Bradsher, interview with author. Bradsher wrote a numberof excellent articles about Snowden and Ho. See Bradsher, “Hasty Exit Startedwith Pizza Inside a Hong Kong Hideout.”Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 3079/30/16 8:13 AM308 | Notes to pages 8–238 appointment with Robert Tibbo: Tibbo, interviews with author.11–12 “angel descending”: Snowden, interview with Brian Williams, NBC, May 28,2014.chapter 1 Tinker15 “It’s like the boiling frog”: Bamford, “Edward Snowden.”15 Lon Snowden, like his father: The best reporting on Snowden’s childhood wasdone by Suzanne Andrews. See Burrough, Ellison, and Andrews, “SnowdenSaga.”16 Brad Gunson, who knew Snowden: Carol D. Leonnig, Jenna Johnson, and MarcFisher, “Who Is Edward Snowden?,” Washington Post, June 15, 2013.16 Snowden stayed home: Kinsey, interview with author.16 Posting under the alias: Mullin, “NSA Leaker Ed Snowden’s Life on ArsTechnica.”16 He even went to anime conventions: Christopher Johnson, “Chatting AboutJapan with Snowden,” Japan Times, June 18, 2013.17 “body fat percentage”: Leonnig, Johnson, and Fisher, “Who Is Edward Snowden?”17 “I’ve always dreamed”: Mullin, “NSA Leaker Ed Snowden’s Life on ArsTechnica.”17 Admiral Barrett: Coast Guard Biography, http://www.uscg.mil/history/people/Flags/BarrettEBio.pdf. Also, for his FBI career, see http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/OathBetrayed/FBI%2047.pdf.18 Army records show: Author interviews. The U.S. Army spokesman GeorgeWright stated Snowden was enrolled in the program between May 7, 2004,and September 28, 2004. The spokesman Colonel David Patterson said, “Heattempted to qualify to become a Special Forces soldier but did not complete therequisite training and was administratively discharged from the army.”18 taking a job as a security guard: Burrough, Ellison, and Andrews, “SnowdenSaga.”19 “So sexxxy it hurts”: The information about Snowden’s modeling career comesfrom his posts on Ars Technica. See Mullin, “NSA Leaker Ed Snowden’s Life onArs Technica.”19 Jonathan Mills, Lindsay’s father: Daniel Bates, “Snowden Totally Abandoned HisGirlfriend When He Fled amid NSA Revelations, Her Dad Says,” Daily Mail,Jan. 17, 2014. The information about Lindsay Mills comes from her Twitter andInstagram postings.19 The CIA’s minimum requirements in 2006: https://www.cia.gov/careers/application-process.chapter 2 Secret Agent22 “It seems to me spies”: Snowden, interview with Williams.23 team of information technologists: Former CIA officer who requested anonymity,interview with author.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 3089/30/16 8:13 AMNotes to pages 23–25 | 30923 The only person: “Edward Snowden’s Friend Mavanee Anderson ExclusiveInterview,” Last Word, MSNBC, June 12, 2013, www.youtube.com/watch?v=beQUMdolBWE.25 “was trying to break into”: Schmitt, “C.I.A. Warning on Snowden in ’09 Said toSlip Through the Cracks.”26 explained the discrepancy: Former CIA officer who requested anonymity, interviewwith author.26 “It was not a stellar”: Drumheller, interviews with author.26 “e-mail spat”: Snowden was interviewed via the Internet by Risen, “SnowdenSays He Took No Secret Files to Russia.”26 “totally incapable”: Snowden, interview with Bamford, “Edward Snowden.”27 “through the system”: Burrough, Ellison, and Andrews, “Snowden Saga.”chapter 3 Contractor28 “Much of what I saw”: Greenwald, Poitras, and MacAskill, “Edward Snowden.”30 This “free pass”: Tyler Drumheller, interview with author.30 “So the guy with whom the CIA”: Morell, Great War of Our Time, 284.30 His initial job for Dell: Burrough, Ellison, and Andrews, “Snowden Saga.”31 Lindsay Mills: The information about Lindsay comes from her postings on Instagramand her blog L’s Journey, https://twitter.com/lsjourneys. The informationabout her and Snowden’s travel to Mount Fuji and other places in Japancomes from the Little Red Ninja blog written by Jennie Chamberlin: https://www.facebook.com/Little-Red-Ninja-214045021941347/timeline/.32 working on a backup system: Burrough, Ellison, and Andrews, “SnowdenSaga.”32 most of the classified data: Source who requested anonymity, interview withauthor.32 spotted a major flaw: Snowden, interview with Bamford, “Edward Snowden.”32 “I actually recommended”: Ibid.33 Snowden made a ten-day trip: Harris, “What Was Edward Snowden Doing inIndia?” Also, Shilpa Phadnis, “Edward Snowden Sharpened His Hacking Skillsin Delhi,” Times of India, Dec. 4, 2013.33 “It is a dead-end job”: Former Booz Allen official who requested anonymity,interview with author.33 shaded by a sakura: The description of Snowden’s life in Maryland comes entirelyfrom Lindsay Mills’s Internet postings. See L’s Journey.34 The guest speaker was: Michael Hayden, interview with the author.34 “They [the NSA] are intent”: Greenwald, Poitras, and MacAskill, “EdwardSnowden.”34 “none of whom took any action”: Andrea Peterson, “Snowden: I Raised NSAConcerns Internally over 10 Times Before Going Rogue,” Washington Post,March 7, 2014. The NSA’s response came from the NSA spokesperson VaneeVines in an author interview.35 U.S. Investigations Services: Dion Nissenbaum, “U.S. Gives New Contract toFirm That Vetted NSA Leaker Edward Snowden,” Wall Street Journal, July 2,2014.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 3099/30/16 8:13 AM310 | Notes to pages 38–48chapter 4 Thief38 In Hawaii in 2012: Former Dell executive who requested anonymity because ofcompany policy restricting Dell employees from discussing the Snowden case,interview with author.38 “You’re in a vaulted space”: Transcript of interview with Snowden in Moscow.Rusbridger and MacAskill, “I, Spy.”39 “Law is a lot like medicine”: David Weigel, “Edward Snowden and Ron PaulKick Off Libertarian Student Conference,” Bloomberg News, Feb. 13, 2015.For Ron Paul’s position on “secret government,” see http://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2015/06/02/413952/US-Ron-Paul-CIA-NSA-secret-government.39 “The [American] government”: Arundhati Roy, “Edward Snowden MeetsArundhati Roy and John Cusack,” Guardian, Nov. 28, 2015.40 “fear and a false image”: Bamford, “Edward Snowden.”40 Snowden was fully aware: Snowden in Moscow, e-mail interview with JamesRisen. Risen, “Snowden Says He Took No Secret Files to Russia.”41 Physical Phatness: Lindsay Mills’s Facebook page, https://www.facebook.com/lindsay.mills.90/about.42 the first known document: Ledgett revealed this in an interview with Vanity Fair.Burrough, Ellison, and Andrews, “Snowden Saga.”42 “He stole the [NSA] test”: Snowden’s obtaining the NSA examination isdescribed by Michael McConnell. See King, “Ex-NSA Chief Details Snowden’sHiring at Agency, Booz Allen.” The extended video of the interview is at www.wsj.com.42 “It was totally unrealistic”: NSA executive who requested anonymity, interviewwith author.43 subsequently joking to a reporter: Bamford, “Edward Snowden.”chapter 5 Crossing the Rubicon44 “What I came to feel”: Snowden quoted in Rusbridger and MacAskill, “I, Spy.”44 “was moving copies of that data”: Burrough, Ellison, and Andrews, “SnowdenSaga.”45 he later pointed out: Bamford, “Edward Snowden.”45 Ledgett subsequently reported: Burrough, Ellison, and Andrews, “SnowdenSaga.”45 This theft was made: Michael Hayden, interview with author.46 “I crossed that line”: Burrough, Ellison, and Andrews, “Snowden Saga.”46 “We’re subverting our security”: Transcript of Snowden interview on PBS. JamesBamford and Tim De Chant, “Edward Snowden on Cyber Warfare,” Nova, Jan. 8,2015, www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/next/military/snowden-transcript.46 bragged to James Risen: Risen, “Snowden Says He Took No Secret Files toRussia.”47 this counterculture is “tormented”: Shils, Torment of Secrecy.47 “[The elites] know everything”: Roy, “Edward Snowden Meets Arundhati Royand John Cusack.”47 “What do you think”: Gellman, “Edward Snowden, After Months of NSA Revelations,Says His Mission’s Accomplished.”48 violate U.S. espionage laws: Michael Hayden, interview with author.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 3109/30/16 8:13 AMNotes to pages 49–59 | 311chapter 6 Hacktivist49 the group Anonymous: Coleman, Hacker, Hoaxer, Whistleblower, Spy, 1–8.50 “My own forays”: Sue Halpern, “In the Depths of the Net,” New York Review ofBooks, Oct. 8, 2015.51 Silk Road, which acted: Holman W. Jenkins Jr., “The Anti-hero of Silk Road,”Wall Street Journal, June 3, 2015. Also, Justice Department official who requestedanonymity, interview with author.51 “Tor’s importance”: Hastings, “Julian Assange.” Also see Julian Assange, introductionto Underground, by Suelette Dreyfus and Julian Assange (Edinburgh:Canongate, 2012).51 Tor was a creation: Fitzpatrick, Privacy for Me and Not for Thee, pt. 6.52 “the state is all-powerful”: Fitzpatrick, introduction to ibid.53 “Meet the Most Dangerous Man”: Appelbaum, interview with RollingStone, “Meet the Most Dangerous Man in Cyberspace: The American BehindWikiLeaks,” Rolling Stone, Dec. 2, 2010.53 In Berlin, Appelbaum: Packer, “Holder of Secrets.”54 she identified herself: Runa A. Sandvik, Forbes, http://www.forbes.com/sites/runasandvik/.54 According to an anonymous: Andy Greenberg, “An NSA Coworker Remembersthe Real Edward Snowden,” Forbes, Dec. 16, 2013.54 “Without Tor,” he later wrote: Twitter, https://twitter.com/snowden/status/682257506018672640.54 “Tor Stinks”: Sean Michael Kerner, “Snowden Leaks Show NSA Targets Tor,”E Week, Oct. 4, 2013.55 He would later tell Sandvik: Runa A. Sandvik, “What Edward Snowden Said atthe Nordic Media Festival,” Forbes, May 10, 2015.55 According to Sandvik’s account: Sandvik did not reveal her encounter withSnowden in any of her blogs until eleven months after Snowden went public inJune 2013. It was only after Greenwald disclosed in his book No Place to Hidethat Snowden used the alias Cincinnatus that Internet investigators discoveredhe had hosted with Sandvik the CryptoParty. Sandvik then wrote her account ofit. See Sandvik, “That One Time I Threw a CryptoParty with Edward Snowden.”Also, Kevin Poulsen, “Snowden’s First Move Against the NSA Was a Party inHawaii,” Wired, May 21, 2014.56 owner of BoxJelly: Fujihira, interview with author.57 “The idea was to spread”: Morell, Great War of Our Time, 288.58 “Snowden was not an NSA”: Former NSA executive who requested anonymity,interview with author.chapter 7 String Puller59 “It wasn’t that they put”: Gellman, “Edward Snowden, After Months of NSARevelations, Says His Mission’s Accomplished.”59 He used the same alias: All of Snowden’s post-party activities in 2012 and 2013come from the Twitter account of “Oahu Crypto Party.”59 The journalist to whom: The description of Snowden’s attempts to contactGreen wald in December 2012 and January 2013 can be found in Greenwald, NoPlace to Hide, 7–10.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 3119/30/16 8:13 AM312 | Notes to pages 59–7059 Greenwald had not always: Mark Memmott, “He Broke the NSA Leaks Story,but Just Who Is Glenn Greenwald?,” NPR, June 11, 2013. For his part ownershipof the HJ website, see Dareh Gregorian, “Glenn Greenwald, Journalist WhoBroke Edward Snowden Story, Was Once Lawyer Sued over Porn Business,”Daily News, June 26, 2013. Also, Jessica Testa, “How Glenn Greenwald BecameGlenn Greenwald,” BuzzFeed, June 26, 2013.60 by “ordering illegal eavesdropping”: Greenwald, No Place to Hide, 2. On RonPaul, see ibid., 24.60 Freedom of the Press Foundation: Michael Calderone, “Freedom of the PressFoundation Launches to Support WikiLeaks,” Huffington Post, Dec. 16, 2012.60 “The first serious info war”: David Sarno, “ ‘Hacktivists’ Fight for Their CauseOnline,” Los Angeles Times, Dec. 11, 2010.61 “The US operates a sprawling”: Glenn Greenwald, “FBI’s Abuse of the SurveillanceState Is the Real Scandal Needing Investigation,” Guardian, Nov. 13, 2012.62 Poitras had been diligently filming: Adan Salazar, “Mini Documentary RevealsFull Extent of ‘Stellarwind’ Domestic Spy Program,” Infowars, Aug. 28, 2012.62 Poitras had other impressive credentials: “Laura Poitras: Secret No Longer,” NewSchool News, Aug. 14, 2013.63 “I didn’t. You chose yourself”: Snowden’s e-mails to Poitras were extracted fromher film Citizenfour and published in Wired. See Greenberg, “These Are theEmails Snowden Sent to First Introduce His Epic NSA Leaks.”63 he wrote to Micah Lee: Lee’s involvement with Snowden, although known to thejournalists Greenwald and Poitras since April 2013, was not revealed to the publicfor some eighteen months. Lee, “Ed Snowden Taught Me to Smuggle SecretsPast Incredible Danger.”63 “I was at that point filming”: Poitras, interview with Amy Goodman, DemocracyNow, Jan. 15, 2015, http://www.democracynow.org/blog/2015/1/15/oscars_2015_laura_poitras_film_on.64 “At this stage”: Greenberg, “These Are the Emails Snowden Sent to First IntroduceHis Epic NSA Leaks.”65 surveillance of her communications: Glenn Greenwald, “U.S. Filmmaker RepeatedlyDetained at Border,” Salon, April 8, 2012.65 “Kafkaesque government harassment”: Ben Child, “Citizenfour Director LauraPoitras Sues US over ‘Kafkaesque Harassment,’ ” Guardian, July 14, 2015.65 “more paranoid”: Snowden, interview with vanden Heuvel and Cohen,“Snowden Speaks.”66 “Is C4 a trap?”: Andy Greenberg, “Snowden’s Chronicler Reveals Her Own LifeUnder Surveillance,” Wired, Feb. 4, 2016.66 Stellarwind: Greenberg, “These Are the Emails Snowden Sent to First IntroduceHis Epic NSA Leaks.”67 “No one, not even”: Ibid.68 under enormous stress: Greenberg, “Snowden’s Chronicler Reveals Her OwnLife Under Surveillance.”69 he had Poitras write: “The Frontline Interviews,” “Barton Gellman,” PBS, March 7,2014, http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/government-elections-politics/united-states-of-secrets/the-frontline-interview-barton-gellman/.69 Poitras had requested help: Karen Greenberg, interview with the author.70 Council on American-Islamic Relations: CAIR-NY Blog, “Glenn GreenwaldSpeaks at CAIR-NY Annual Banquet,” May 16, 2013.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 3129/30/16 8:13 AMNotes to pages 71–80 | 31371 When they finally settled: The descriptions of the initial two meetings betweenGreenwald and Poitras in April 2013 are provided in Greenwald’s 2014 book, NoPlace to Hide, pp. 10-15.chapter 8 Raider of the Inner Sanctum73 “They think there’s a smoking gun”: Bamford, “Edward Snowden.”74 system for stratifying its data: Michael McConnell, interview with King, “Ex-NSA Chief Details Snowden’s Hiring at Agency, Booz Allen.”74 Snowden applied to Booz Allen: Booz Allen officer who requested anonymity,interview with author.5 “Snowden was an IT guy”: John R. Schindler, “Snowden Is a Fraud,” XX Committee,June 12, 2015.75 “get access to lists”: Lana Lam, “Post Reporter Lana Lam Tells of Her Journeyinto the Secret World of Edward Snowden,” South China Morning Post, June 23,2013.75 “He targeted my company”: King, “Ex-NSA Chief Details Snowden’s Hiring atAgency, Booz Allen.”75 he would not have password access: Former NSA executive who requested anonymity,interview with author.75 engaged in a minor subterfuge: Hosenball, “NSA Contractor Hired SnowdenDespite Concerns About Resume Discrepancies.”76 “playing with fire”: Spencer Ackerman and Ewen MacAskill, “Snowden Callsfor Whistleblower After Claims by New Pentagon Source,” Guardian, May 22,2016.76 establish a paper trail: Director of National Intelligence, IC on the Record (blogon Tumblr), May 27, 2014, http://icontherecord.tumblr.com/post/87218708448/edward-j-snowden-email-inquiry-to-the-nsa-office. Snowden response, in“Edward Snowden Responds to Release of E-mail by U.S. Officials,” WashingtonPost, May 29, 2014.77 He returned on April 13: Lindsay Mills’s blog.77 a brief medical leave: Former NSA executive who requested anonymity, interviewwith author.77 needed to get passwords: Stephen Braun, “NSA to Congress: Snowden CopiedCo-worker’s Password,” Military Times, Feb. 13, 2014.78 software applications called spiders: David E. Sanger and Eric Schmitt, “SnowdenUsed Low-Cost Tool to Best N.S.A.,” New York Times, Feb. 8, 2014.78 Finally, Snowden had to: Former intelligence officer who requested anonymity,interview with author.78 These later acquisitions: The document can be seen in the National SecurityArchives, http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB436/docs/EBB-059.pdf.chapter 9 Escape Artist80 “I’m not self-destructive”: Bamford, “Edward Snowden.”80 “I took everything”: Edward Snowden and Peter Taylor, “Are You a Traitor?,”transcript, Panorama, BBC, Oct. 15, 2015 (aired on BBC Oct. 10, 2015).Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 3139/30/16 8:13 AM314 | Notes to pages 80–9680 At this point: Former DIA officer who requested anonymity, interview withauthor.80 He had visited Hong Kong: Lindsay Mills’s blog.80 According to Albert Ho: Bradsher, “Hasty Exit Started with Pizza Inside a HongKong Hideout.” Also, Keith Bradsher, interview with author.81 for the next ten days: Former DIA officer who requested anonymity, interviewwith author.81 “his first priority”: Greenwald, No Place to Hide, 43.81 “That whole period”: Rusbridger and MacAskill, “I, Spy.”81 He e-mailed Gellman: Gellman, “Code Name ‘Verax.’ ”81 Gellman could not make: Greenwald, No Place to Hide, 51–52.82 more pressure on Gellman: Gellman, “Code Name ‘Verax.’ ”82 “I’ve been working on”: Greenwald, No Place to Hide, 11.83 Continuing his string pulling : Greenberg, “These Are the Emails Snowden Sentto First Introduce His Epic NSA Leaks.”83 asked Appelbaum to help: Appelbaum, “Edward Snowden Interview.”84 Greenwald was awaiting: Greenwald, No Place to Hide, 16–18.85 Gibson authorized Greenwald’s trip: The description of The Guardian’s reactionto Greenwald’s offer of a scoop was reported by Luke Harding, a Guardianreporter commissioned to write The Snowden Files, a book that OliverStone bought the film rights for from The Guardian for $700,000. See Harding,Snowden Files, 100–115.86 Snowden arranged for Micah Lee: Lee, “Ed Snowden Taught Me to SmuggleSecrets Past Incredible Danger.”chapter 10 Whistle-blower88 “They elected me”: Gellman, “Edward Snowden, After Months of NSA Revelations,Says His Mission’s Accomplished.”88 “I feel alone”: Lindsay Mills’s blog.89 “so we don’t have a clue”: Greenberg, “These Are the Emails Snowden Sent toFirst Introduce His Epic NSA Leaks.”89 “On timing, regarding meeting”: The description of the meetings with Snowdenin Hong Kong, June 3–June 9, is taken from Poitras’s documentary Citizenfour.The film can be found at https://thoughtmaybe.com/citizenfour/.90 “The initial impression”: Greenwald, No Place to Hide, 30.90 “Minutes after meeting”: Packer, “Holder of Secrets.”90 One possible reason: Snowden, interview with Williams; Bamford, “EdwardSnowden”; Jane Mayer, “Snowden Calls Russian-Spy Story ‘Absurd’ in ExclusiveInterview,” New Yorker, Jan. 21, 2014.92 the Guardian policy required: Harding, Snowden Files, 114–16.94 The next morning he: Packer, “Holder of Secrets.”94 Tibbo and Man planned: Patrick Koehler, “The Hong Kong Layover in Snowden’sGetaway,” New York Times, Sept. 8, 2016.94 “I am in a safe house”: Greenwald, No Place to Hide, 8.95 The journalist chosen: Lam, “Post Reporter Lana Lam Tells of Her Journey intothe Secret World of Edward Snowden.”Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 3149/30/16 8:13 AMNotes to pages 98–109 | 31596 “I was being tailed”: Corbett, “How a Snowdenista Kept the NSA Leaker Hiddenin a Moscow Airport.”chapter 11 Enter Assange98 “Thanks to Russia”: Julian Assange, “How ‘The Guardian’ Milked EdwardSnowden’s Story,” Newsweek, April 20, 2015.98 Julian Assange had made: David Leigh and Luke Harding, “Julian Assange: TheTeen Hacker Who Became Insurgent in Information War,” Guardian, Jan. 30,2011.99 Sarah Harrison: Sarah Ellison, “The Man Who Came to Dinner,” Vanity Fair,Oct. 2013.99 Snowden telephoned Assange: Assange interview, in Giles Whittell, “JulianAssange Unmasked,” Sunday Times (London), Aug. 29, 2015.99 “Snowden told me they had abused Manning”: Michael Sontheimer, “SpiegelInterview with Julian Assange,” Spiegel Online International, July 19, 2015.100 Assange called Harrison: Corbett, “How a Snowdenista Kept the NSA LeakerHidden in a Moscow Airport.”101 “We were working very hard”: Ibid.101 U.S. government informed: Jane Perlez and Keith Bradsher, “China Said to HaveMade Call to Let Leaker Depart,” New York Times, June 23, 2013.102 Tibbo wanted Snowden to remain: Tibbo, interview with author.103 “The purpose of my mission”: Rusbridger and MacAskill, “I, Spy.”chapter 12 Fugitive104 “If I end up in chains”: Snowden video on the Guardian site, June 17, 2013, www.theguardian.com/world/video/2014/jul/17/edward-snowden-video-interview.104 insert an encrypted key: Gellman, “Code Name ‘Verax.’ ”104 “I can’t help him evade”: Gellman quoted in Burrough, Ellison, and Andrews,“Snowden Saga.”105 asked Fidel Narváez: Juan Forero, “Ecuador’s Strange Journey from EmbracingSnowden to Turning Him Away,” Washington Post, July 2, 2013.106 “My only comment”: Lam, “Post Reporter Lana Lam Tells of Her Journey intothe Secret World of Edward Snowden.”106 his passage through: Perlez and Bradsher, “China Said to Have Made Call to LetLeaker Depart.”107 Snowden first met Harrison: Corbett, “How a Snowdenista Kept the NSA LeakerHidden in a Moscow Airport.”107 Assange continued creating: Assange interview, in Whittell, “Julian AssangeUnmasked.”108 “Anyone in a three-mile radius”: Corbett, “How a Snowdenista Kept the NSALeaker Hidden in a Moscow Airport.”108 $20,000 fee: Station KGUN9, “Documents: Snowden Paid 20K for UA SkypeTalk,” ABC 15 Arizona, April 1, 2016, //www.abc15.com/news/region-central-southern-az/tucson/documents-snowden-paid-20k-for-ua-skype-talk.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 3159/30/16 8:13 AM316 | Notes to pages 113–121109 first live interview in Moscow: Snowden met with James Bamford, the authorof the 1982 book The Puzzle Palace, in Moscow in June 2014. Bamford, “EdwardSnowden.”chapter 13 The Great Divide113 “That moral decision”: Edward Snowden, statement, http://wikileaks/statement-from-Edward-Snowden.114 “Sitting on his unmade bed”: Packer, “Holder of Secrets.”114 This powerful narrative: See Greenwald, No Place to Hide, 248–54; Snowden,interview with Williams.114 “There was no question”: Emily Bell, “Snowden Interview: Why the Media Isn’tDoing Its Job,” Columbia Journalism Review, May 10, 2016.115 When two NSA analysts: “Claim US Spy Caught with Secrets,” Los AngelesMirror, Aug. 2, 1960, 1. Also see Rick Anderson, “Before Edward Snowden,”Salon, July 1, 2013.115 “man up”: Interview with John Kerry, CBS This Morning, May 28, 2014.115 By the Lawfare Institute’s count: https://www.lawfareblog.com/snowden-revelations.116 British cyber service GCHQ: RT television report, “NSA, GCHQ TargetedKaspersky, Other Cyber Security Companies,” June 22, 2015, http://www.rt.com/usa/268891-nsa-gchq-software-kaspersky/.116 six government employees: Matt Apuzzo, “C.I.A. Officer Is Found Guilty in LeakTied to Times Reporter,” New York Times, Jan. 26, 2015. The notable exceptionto the policy of seeking imprisonment of intelligence workers found guilty ofpassing classified information to journalists is the extraordinary case of the ex-CIA director General David Petraeus. Petraeus had given classified informationfrom his personal notebooks to his mistress and biographer, Paula Broadwell.Although none of this information appeared in her 2012 biography, All In: TheEducation of Davis Petraeus, he had violated his oath to protect this information.Yet in a 2014 deal with the Justice Department, Petraeus was allowed toplead guilty to a misdemeanor charge and sentenced to two years’ probation anda $100,000 fine. See Eli Lake, “Petraeus, Justice, and Washington’s Culture ofLeaks,” Bloomberg View, March 4, 2015.117 he posted about it: Snowden wrote in chat rooms on the Ars Technica sitebetween May 2001 and May 2012. His posts are quoted by Mullin, “NSA LeakerEd Snowden’s Life on Ars Technica.”117 “an act of civil disobedience”: Mayer, “Snowden Calls Russian-Spy Story‘Absurd’ in Exclusive Interview.”117 Ben Wizner, a lawyer: Wizner called his representation of Snowden the “work ofa lifetime.” Hill, “How ACLU Lawyer Ben Wizner Became Snowden’s Lawyer.”118 “We’ve crossed lines”: Snowden quoted by Bamford, “Edward Snowden.”119 “Snowden a whistleblower”: Cheryl Arvidson, “Distrust of Government Apparentin Snowden Case,” Leader’s Edge, Oct. 2013.119 “they can trust”: “Beyond Distrust: How Americans View Their Government,”Pew Research Center, Nov. 23, 2015.119 “Thanks to one man’s”: Rebecca Shabad, “Former Rep. Ron Paul Launches Petitionfor Snowden Clemency,” Hill, Feb. 13, 2014.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 3169/30/16 8:13 AMNotes to pages 121–129 | 317119 his son Senator Rand Paul: See Katie Glueck, “Rand Paul Backs Snowden, BashesClapper,” Politico, Jan. 5, 2014.119 “We actually buy cell phones”: Snowden quoted in “New The Guardian Interviewwith Edward Snowden,” Guardian, July 17, 2014, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jul/18/-sp-edward-snowden-nsa-whistleblower-interview-transcript.121 Dominique Strauss-Kahn: Edward Jay Epstein, “What Really Happened toStrauss-Kahn,” New York Review of Books, Dec. 22, 2011. Vance made his statementon the Charlie Rose show, Feb. 19, 2016.121 Apple made headlines: Mike Isaac, “Apple Still Holds the Keys to Its Cloud Service,but Reluctantly,” New York Times, Feb. 21, 2016.121 Consumer Financial Protection Bureau: Newt Gingrich, “A Government SnoopThat Puts the NSA to Shame,” Wall Street Journal, July 7, 2015.122 the FISA court: http://www.fjc.gov/history/home.nsf/page/courts_special_fisc.html.123 “His approach was”: Ellen Nakashima and Joby Warrick, “For NSA Chief, TerroristThreat Drives Passion to ‘Collect It All,’ ” Washington Post, July 14, 2013.123 Second U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals: Charlie Savage and Jonathan Weisman,“N.S.A. Collection of Bulk Data Is Ruled Illegal,” New York Times, May 5, 2015.This court decision was stayed three months later on August 27, 2015, by athree-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals on procedural grounds. By thistime, however, the legal issue was rendered moot by Congress. See http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca2/2015/.124 knowledge of the service providers: Timothy B. Lee, “Here’s Everything WeKnow About PRISM to Date,” Washington Post, June 12, 2013.125 “Edward Snowden is not the ‘whistleblower’ ”: Nicole Mulvaney, “NSA DirectorAdm. Michael Rogers Discusses Freedom, Privacy, and Security Issues at PrincetonUniversity,” NJ.com, March 14, 2015.126 “Snowden stole from the United States”: Mark Hosenball, “U.S. Spy AgencyTargets Changed Behavior After Snowden,” Reuters, May 12, 2014.126 “The vast majority”: “Snowden Leak Could Cost Military Billions: Pentagon,”NBC News, March 6, 2014.126 “over 900,000” military files: The document was obtained via a Freedom ofInformation request by Vice. See Leopold, “Inside Washington’s Quest to BringDown Edward Snowden.”126 “has caused grave damage”: Hearings Before Senate Select Committee on Intelligence,Jan. 27, 2014. See http://www.dia.mil/News/SpeechesandTestimonies/ArticleView/tabid/11449/Article/567078/dia-director-flynn-unauthorized-disclosures-have-caused-grave-damage-to-our-nat.aspx.126 The CIA’s assessment: Morell, Great War of Our Time, 298.127 “the greatest damage”: Transcript of interview with General Keith Alexander,Australian Financial Review, May 8, 2014, http://www.afr.com/technology/web/security/interview-transcriptformer-head-of-the-nsa-and-commander-of-the-us-cyber-command-general-keith-alexander-20140507-itzhw#ixzz3m6TkuRa1.127 “I don’t look at this”: Jeremy Herb and Justin Sink, “Sen. Feinstein Calls Snowden’sNSA Leaks an ‘Act of Treason,’ ” Hill, June 6, 2013.128 duck-rabbit cartoon: Jastrow, Fact and Fable in Psychology, 202–4.128 “I haven’t shot anybody”: Mark McClish, “The Last Words of Lee HarveyOswald,” Statement Analysis, Jan. 3, 2013, http://www.statementanalysis.comEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 3179/30/16 8:13 AM318 | Notes to pages 130–141/lee-harvey-oswald/. Like Snowden, Oswald was a high school dropout froma broken family who joined an elite unit of the U.S. military but failed to getan honorable discharge, became hostile to policies of the U.S. government, anddefected to Russia. See Edward Jay Epstein, Legend: The Secret World of Lee HarveyOswald (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978), 64–104.129 Clapper answered that: The transcript was published by The Washington Post,Jan. 29, 2014. For Clapper’s earlier closed-door testimony, see Steven Aftergood,“The Clapper ‘Lie’ and the Senate Intelligence Committee,” FAS, Jan. 6, 2014.130 On his application to Booz Allen: Hosenball, “NSA Contractor Hired SnowdenDespite Concerns About Resume Discrepancies.”130 in contacting Laura Poitras: Greenberg, “These Are the Emails Snowden Sent toFirst Introduce His Epic NSA Leaks.”130 “read” in the news reports: Snowden Q&A, Moscow, July 12, 2013, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yNQSVurlAak.131 “Consul General–Hong Kong”: James Gordon Meek et al., “NSA Leaker EdwardSnowden Seeks Asylum in Ecuador,” ABC News, June 23, 2013.131 “had an enormous interest”: Morell, Great War of Our Time, 284.131 the Enigma machines: Sebag-Montefiore, Enigma, 286–94.chapter 14 The Crime Scene Investigation133 “Any private contractor”: Snowden, interview with Williams.133 Fifteen miles northwest: U.S. Navy Information Operations Command, “Historyof NIOC Hawaii,” http://www.public.navy.mil/fcc-c10f/niochi/Pages/AboutUs.aspx.134 General Alexander: Alexander, interview with author.134 The NSA had also notified: Former NSA executive who requested anonymity,interview with author.136 NSA did not immediately share: Morell, Great War of Our Time, 283–88.136 briefed by the NSA: See “Unclassified Declaration of David G. Leatherwood,”U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, Case 1:10-cv-02119-RMCDocument 63-8 Filed 04/26/13, https://www.fas.org/sgp/jud/shaffer/042613-leather.pdf.137 By late July: Former intelligence executive familiar with the initial investigationwho requested anonymity, interview with author.137 According to Ledgett: Tabassum Zakaria and Warren Strobel, “After ‘Cataclysmic’Snowden Affair, NSA Faces Winds of Change,” Reuters, Dec. 13, 2013.138 “Something is not right”: Transcript of interview with Alexander, AustralianFinancial Review, May 8, 2014.138 This discovery came: “Glenn Greenwald’s Partner Detained at Heathrow Airportfor Nine Hours,” Guardian, Aug. 18, 2013.139 downloading documents: Ledgett was interviewed in this timeline by Bryan Burrough.See Burrough, Ellison, and Andrews, “Snowden Saga.”139 the chronology: NSA executive who requested anonymity, interview with author.140 “millions of records”: Snowden interview, German NDR TV, Jan. 26, 2014,http://www.tagesschau.de/snowden-interview-englisch100.pdf.140 The FBI could assume: Former Justice Department official with knowledge of theSnowden case who requested anonymity, interview with author.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 3189/30/16 8:13 AMNotes to pages 141–159 | 319141 “I’m in exile”: Former member of the national security staff who cited StateDepartment records, interview with author. Also, Jen Psaki, the State Departmentspokeswoman, told AP, “As is routine and consistent with US regulations, personswith felony arrest warrants are subject to having their passport revoked.”That arrest warrant was issued on June 14, 2013. The State Department OperationsCenter alert said “Snowden’s U.S. passport was revoked on June 22, 2013,”after the Justice Department unsealed the charges that had been filed in the U.S.District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia on June 14, 2013. “The ConsulGeneral in Hong Kong confirmed Hong Kong authorities were notified that Mr.Snowden’s passport was revoked on June 22,” according to the State Department’ssenior watch officer.142 had met nearly every day: Miller, “U.S. Officials Scrambled to Nab Snowden.”142 Putin admitted: Interview, Channel One, http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/19143.143 “Vladimir Putin had personally approved”: Jennifer Martinez, “Report: Snowden’sUS Passport Revoked,” Hill, June 23, 2013.chapter 15 Did Snowden Act Alone?146 “When you look at the totality”: Hayden, interview with author. Also, “HaydenInterview,” Meet the Press, NBC-TV, Dec. 15, 2013.146 whistle-blower Bradley Birkenfeld: David Kocieniewski, “Whistle-BlowerAwarded $104 Million by I.R.S.,” New York Times, Sept. 11, 2012.147 whistle-blower Daniel Ellsberg: Martin Arnold, “Pentagon Papers Charges AreDismissed,” New York Times, May 11, 1973.147 FBI office in Media: Mark Mazzetti, “Burglars Who Took On F.B.I. AbandonShadows,” New York Times, Jan. 7, 2014.147 “treasure trove”: Andrew, The Sword and the Shield, 206.150 “It is inconceivable to me”: Former Booz Allen executive who requested anonymity,interview with author.152 we know that Snowden: Sandvik, “That One Time I Threw a CryptoParty withEdward Snowden.”152 The FBI, which was: Senate Intelligence Committee staff member who requestedanonymity, interview with author.153 “Snowden may have carried out”: Drumheller, interview with author.153 As Snowden acknowledges: Bamford, “Edward Snowden.”154 “absence of evidence”: Carl Sagan, Cosmos (New York: Random House, 1980), 49.154 “The greatest trick”: Cherkashin, interview with author. The quotation from TheUsual Suspects was adopted by the movie from Charles Baudelaire’s observation“La plus belle des ruses du diable est de vous persuader qu’il n’existe pas.”chapter 16 The Question of When156 “The NSA was actually”: Bamford and De Chant, “Edward Snowden on CyberWarfare.”156 The career of the KGB mole: Bagley, Spy Wars, 46.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 3199/30/16 8:13 AM320 | Notes to pages 159–171157 A counterespionage review: Member of the PFIAB who requested anonymity,interview with author.157 “in that they both used”: Kevin Gosztola, “NSA Inspector General Speaks onSnowden for First Time,” Shadow Proof, Feb. 25, 2014.157 KGB major Anatoliy Golitsyn: Bagley, Spy Wars, 6–11.158 Wang Lijun: Steven Lee Myers and Mark Landler, “Frenzied Hours for U.S. onFate of a China Insider,” New York Times, April 17, 2012.159 “I think Snowden is”: Vincent Kessler, “Snowden Being Manipulated by RussianIntelligence: Ex-NSA Chief,” Reuters, May 7, 2014.160 A former CIA officer: Tyler Drumheller, interview with author.161 “It is not statistically improbable”: Former NSA officer who requested anonymity,interview with author.162 “when and how he”: Morell, Great War of Our Time, 296.163 “looking to capitalize on”: Transcript of interview with Alexander, AustralianFinancial Review, May 8, 2014.164 “He can compromise thousands”: Carol J. Williams, “NSA Leaker EdwardSnowden Seeks Return to U.S. on His Terms,” Los Angeles Times, July 22,2015.165 “I am still working”: Gellman, “Edward Snowden, After Months of NSA Revelations,Says His Mission’s Accomplished.”165 “every facet of Snowden’s communications”: Reitman, “Snowden andGreen wald.”165 “his hosts”: Richard Byrne Reilly, “Former KGB General: Snowden Is Cooperatingwith Russian Intelligence,” VentureBeat, May 22, 2014.165 “I would lose all respect”: Richard Byrne Reilly, “Former NSA Director: ‘IWould Lose All Respect for Russia if They Haven’t Fully Exploited Snowden,”VentureBeat, May 23, 2014.166 He was put in contact: Kucherena, interview with Der Spiegel, “Snowden’s Lawyer:‘Russia Will Not Hand Him Over,’ ” Spiegel Online International, June 24,2013.166 “Officially, he is my client”: “Snowden in the Kitchen,” Interpreter, Nov. 18,2013.167 an interview as “great”: Bamford and De Chant, “Edward Snowden on CyberWarfare.”167 Putin’s telethon: Elias Groll, “Snowden Called in to Putin’s Telethon. Does ThatReally Make Him a Kremlin Pawn?,” Foreign Policy, April 17, 2014.chapter 17 The Keys to the Kingdom Are Missing168 “There’s a zero percent chance”: Risen, “Snowden Says He Took No Secret Filesto Russia.”168 “the instruction manual”: Glenn Greenwald, “ ‘Guardian’ Journalist: SnowdenDocs Contain NSA ‘Blueprint,’ ” USA Today, June 15, 2013.168 a heart attack: Citizenfour.168 “keys to the kingdom”: Walter Pincus, “Snowden Still Holding ‘Keys to theKingdom,’ ” Washington Post, Dec. 18, 2013. Also, Ledgett interview, 60 Minutes,CBS, Dec. 15, 2013.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 3209/30/16 8:13 AMNotes to pages 171–184 | 321169 “touched” documents: Former NSA official who requested anonymity, interviewwith author.169 more than half the documents: Staff member of the Senate Intelligence Committeewho requested anonymity, interview with author.170 Snowden also disputed: Bamford, “Edward Snowden.”170 via a Vice magazine: Leopold, “Inside Washington’s Quest to Bring Down EdwardSnowden.”171 previously cited road map: Burrough, Ellison, and Andrews, “Snowden Saga.”171 The compartment logs showed: Former NSA official who requested anonymity,interview with author.171 “No intelligence service”: Glenn Greenwald, “Email Exchange Between EdwardSnowden and Former GOP Senator Gordon Humphrey,” Guardian, July 16, 2013.171 An answer soon came: Sophie Shevardnadze, “ ‘Snowden Believes He DidEverything Right’: Lawyer Anatoly Kucherena,” SophieCo, RT television, Sept. 23,2013, //www.rt.com/shows/sophieco/snowden-russia-lawyer-kucherena-214/.172 “all the reports”: Kucherena, interview with author.173 Russian cyber service: Former member of the staff of the national securityadviser who requested anonymity, interview with author.174 State Department explicitly told: Ibid.175 “I had spent ten years”: Hill, “How ACLU Attorney Ben Wizner BecameSnowden’s Lawyer.”176 In the case of Stone’s movie: Irina Alexsander, “Edward Snowden’s Long, StrangeJourney to Hollywood,” New York Times Magazine, Sept. 4, 2016.176 “I went the first six months”: Bell, “Edward Snowden Interview.”176 “There’s nothing on it”: Gellman, “Edward Snowden, After Months of NSARevelations, Says His Mission’s Accomplished.”176–177 former CIA officer Ray McGovern: Mark Hosenball, “Laptops SnowdenTook to Hong Kong, Russia Were a ‘Diversion,’ ” Reuters, Oct. 11, 2013.177 “break my fingers”: Snowden, interview with Williams. See also Burrough, Ellison,and Andrews, “Snowden Saga,” and Bamford, “Edward Snowden.”178 “said they believed that”: Perlez and Bradsher, “China Said to Have Made Call toLet Leaker Depart.”178 “Both the Chinese and the Russians”: Morell, Great War of Our Time, 284.179 “What I can say”: Snowden interview, ARD-TV, Jan. 26, 2014, https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B95Id3j0M0lrdDA5WIZd11Ubjg/preview.179 She urgently texted Snowden: Citizenfour.180 Poitras’s co-interrogator: Appelbaum, “Edward Snowden Interview.”180 there was no document: Former NSA official who requested anonymity, interviewwith author.180 He reported that no: Bamford, “Edward Snowden.”181 another person in the NSA: Ibid.181 Greenwald suggested to the New York Times: Jo Becker, Steven Erlanger and EricSchmitt, “How Russia Often Benefits When Julian Assange Reveal’s the West’sSecrets, “ New York Times, Sept. 1, 2016.181 Greenwald and Poitras: “Snowden Leak: Israeli Commandos Killed Syrian Generalat Dinner Party,” Jerusalem Post, July 16, 2015.182 Specifically, it disclosed: Cora Currier and Henrik Moltke, “Spies in the Sky,”Intercept, Jan. 28, 2016.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 3219/30/16 11:09 AM322 | Notes to pages 185–199182 Putin had publicly enjoined him: Interview, Channel One, http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/19143. Also, former Russian intelligence officer whorequested anonymity, interview with author.183 “If Snowden didn’t give”: Former NSA official who requested anonymity, interviewwith author.183 German federal prosecutor: Theodore Schleifer, “Germany Drops Probe into U.S.Spying on Merkel,” CNN Politics, June 13, 2015.184 “Russian planners might have”: Adam Entous, Julian E. Barnes, and SiobhanGorman, “U.S. Scurries to Shore Up Spying on Russia,” Wall Street Journal,March 24, 2014.184 Britain also discovered: Tom Harper, Richard Kerbaj, and Tim Shipman, “BritishSpies Betrayed to Russians and Chinese,” Sunday Times (London), June 14, 2015.184 “losing some of its capabilities”: Chris Strohm and Gopal Ratnam, “NSA LeaderSeeks Openness on Secret Surveillance Orders,” Bloomberg News, June 13, 2013.Also, staff member of National Security Council who requested anonymity,interview with author.chapter 18 The Unheeded Warning185 “The NSA—the world’s”: Morell, Great War of Our Time, 287.185 Alexander Poteyev: Sergei L. Loiko, “Former Russian Spymaster Convicted ofTreason,” Los Angeles Times, June 28, 2011.186 “live under cover in the West”: Pavel Sudoplatov, Special Tasks: The Memoirs ofan Unwanted Witness (Boston: Little, Brown, 1994), xxii.186 The CIA learned of this: Former NSA official who requested anonymity, interviewwith author.187 “the business of intelligence”: Angleton, interview with author.187 preparing these “Americans”: FBI, “Operation Ghost Stories: Inside the RussianSpy Case,” Oct. 31, 2011, https://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/2011/october/russian_103111/russian_103111.188 NSA at Fort Meade: Gertz, “Counterspies Hunt Russian Mole Inside NationalSecurity Agency.” Also, Bill Gertz, interview with author.188 “They [were] looking for one”: John R. Schindler, “The Painful Truth AboutSnowden,” XX Committee, http://20committee.com/2015/07/19/the-painful-truth-about-snowden/.188 “insider threats by trusted insiders”: Gellman and Miller, “ ‘Black Budget’ SummaryDetails U.S. Spy Network’s Successes, Failures, and Objectives.”189 The preemptive arrests: Gregory L. White, “Russia Convicts Former Spy Officialfor Exposing Agents in U.S. Ring,” Wall Street Journal, June 28, 2011.189 turned up no evidence: Former NSA executive who requested anonymity, interviewwith author.190 “broke the record”: Tennent H. Bagley, Spymaster (New York: Skyhorse, 2015), 3.190 Russia had dispatched: Weiner, Legacy of Ashes, 450–51. Also, Walter Pincus,“CIA Passed Bogus News to Presidents,” Washington Post, Oct. 31, 1995.190 “There are no rivers”: Baker, “Michael Hayden Says U.S. Is Easy Prey forHackers.”191 “The best defense”: Former NSA official who requested anonymity, interviewwith author.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 3229/30/16 8:13 AMchapter 19 The Rise of the NSANotes to pages 199–214 | 323195 “There are many things”: Gellman, “Edward Snowden, After Months of NSARevelations, Says His Mission’s Accomplished.”196 By 1914, the U.S. Army: National Security Agency, Pearl Harbor Review: TheBlack Chamber, NSA, 2009, https://www.nsa.gov/about/cryptologic_heritage/center_cryptologic_history/pearl_harbor_review/black_chamber.shtml.196 “Its far-seeking eyes”: Kahn, Codebreakers, 358.198 The NSA also organized: Woodward, Veil, 471–75.198 In 1980, President Ronald Reagan: David R. Shedd, “How Obama UnilaterallyChilled Surveillance,” Wall Street Journal, Nov. 30, 2015.198 “We are approaching”: Turner, Secrecy and Democracy, 92.198 “vastness”: Woodward, Veil, 202.199 James Bond provision: Ian Cobain, “How Secret Renditions Shed Light on MI6’sLicence to Kill and Torture,” Guardian, Feb. 13, 2012.199 The NSA had assiduously: Kevin Poulsen, “New Snowden Leak Reports‘Groundbreaking’ NSA Crypto-cracking,” Wired, Aug. 29, 2013.200 “Yes, my continental European friends”: Woolsey, “Why We Spy on Our Allies.”200 “very foundation of U.S. intelligence”: John McLaughlin, “We Need NSA to DoWhat It Does—It Makes Us Safer,” Press of Atlantic City, Jan. 8, 2014.201 It made leading hacktivists: Charlie Savage et al., “Hunting for Hackers, N.S.A.Secretly Expands Internet Spying at U.S. Border,” New York Times, June 4,2015.202 “one of the most regulated”: De, “Former NSA Lawyer on ‘Harm’ of EdwardSnowden’s Revelations.”203 the attack on Sony: Rob Lever, “Some Experts Still Aren’t Convinced That NorthKorea Hacked Sony,” Business Insider, Dec. 30, 2014.204 “The Chinese are viewed”: Alexander quoted in Kelley Vlahos, “America’sAlready-Failed Cyber War,” American Conservative, July 23, 2015.204 “We are bolstering our support”: “Black Budget: Congressional Budget JustificationExcerpt,” Washington Post, Aug. 30, 2013.205 These compartments were: Former NSA officer who requested anonymity, interviewwith author.205 “The queen on our chessboard”: Former NSA officer who requested anonymity,interview with author.205 to confront flagging morale: Hayden, interview with author.205–206 “the nation has lost”: Mulvaney, “NSA Director Adm. Michael Rogers DiscussesFreedom, Privacy, and Security Issues at Princeton University.”206 Although repairing the damage: King, “Ex-NSA Chief Details Snowden’s Hiringat Agency, Booz Allen.”chapter 20 The NSA’s Back Door207 “You have private for-profit”: Bamford and De Chant, “Edward Snowden onCyber Warfare.”208 According to a report: “Out of Control,” NSA, http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB424/docs/Cyber-009.pdf.211 “All of us just fell”: Baker, “Michael Hayden Says U.S. Is Easy Prey for Hackers.”Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 3239/30/16 8:13 AM324 | Notes to pages 214–231212 “it stays secret”: De, “Former NSA Lawyer on ‘Harm’ of Edward Snowden’sRevelations.”212 North Korea in 1968: John Prados and Jack Cheevers, “USS Pueblo: LBJ ConsideredNuclear Weapons,” National Security Archive Electronic Briefing BookNo. 453, Jan. 23, 2014.212 Booz Allen Hamilton: Booz Allen Hamilton issued a history of its evolution in2004. “Helping Clients Envision the Future,” PDF file, 2004, https://www.boozallen.com/content/dam/boozallen/documents/90th-History-Book-Complete.pdf.213 The private company named: Julie Creswell, “The Private Equity Firm ThatGrew Too Fast,” New York Times, April 24, 2015.214 USIS had prematurely closed: Tom Hamburger and Debbi Wilgoren, “JusticeDepartment Says USIS Submitted 665,000 Incomplete Background Checks,”Washington Post, Jan. 23, 2014.214 USIS was also open to: Ellen Nakashima, “DHS Contractor Suffers Major ComputerBreach, Officials Say,” Washington Post, Aug. 6, 2014.214 successful 2011 attack: Andy Greenberg, “Anonymous Hackers Breach BoozAllen Hamilton,” Forbes, July 11, 2011.215 a computer system called e-QIP: Joe Davidson, “Federal Background Check SystemShut Down Because of ‘Vulnerability,’ ” Washington Post, June 29, 2015.215 this memorandum noted: Former NSA executive who requested anonymity,interview with author.chapter 21 The Russians Are Coming217 “The collapse of the Soviet Union”: Nick Allen, “Soviet Break-Up Was GeopoliticalDisaster, Says Putin,” Telegraph, April 26, 2005.217 Russian units had managed: Entous, Barnes, and Gorman, “U.S. Scurries toShore Up Spying on Russia.”218 Russian acronym SORM: Steven Aftergood, “The Red Web: Russia and theInternet,” FAS, Oct. 5, 2015.219 William Martin and Bernon Mitchell: David P. Mowry, “Betrayers of the Trust,”Cryptologic Almanac 50th Anniversary Series (NSA), Feb. 28, 2003.220 Victor Norris Hamilton: “American Defector Is Found in Russian Prison,” NewYork Times, June 4, 1992.220 He was found dead: Edward Jay Epstein, “The Spy Wars,” New York Times,Sept. 28, 1980.222 Harold Nicholson: Elizabeth Farnsworth, “Update on the Case of CIA AgentHarold Nicholson,” PBS (transcript), Nov. 19, 1996. See also “Affidavit in Supportof Complaint, Arrest Warrant, and Search Warrants: United States v. HaroldJ. Nicholson,” http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/ciaspy/affidavt.htm.223 When it comes to recruiting moles: Angleton, interviews with author.224 well experienced with false flags: Epstein, Deception, 22–28.224 the “Trust” deception: Ibid. Also, Raymond Rocca (the CIA’s former researchchief for the counterintelligence staff), interview with author.227 “a learning experience”: “Out of Control.”Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 3249/30/16 8:13 AMNotes to pages 232–252 | 325228 127-page Standard Form 86: David Larter and Andrew Tilghman, “MilitaryClearance OPM Data Breach ‘Absolute Calamity,’ ” Navy Times, June 18,2015.229 Under Putin: Nicole Perlroth, “Online Security Experts Link More Breaches toRussian Government,” New York Times, Oct. 28, 2014.229 “It is next to impossible”: Schneier quoted in Jenkins, “Anti-hero of Silk Road.”230 The Silk Road founder: Jenkins, “Anti-hero of Silk Road.” Also, former JusticeDepartment official who requested anonymity, interview with author.230 “better cyber security”: Morell, Great War of Our Time, 291.chapter 22 The Chinese Puzzle231 “The first [false assumption]”: Snowden video in Hong Kong.231 “China its first credible”: 2014 Annual Report to Congress by the U.S.-ChinaEconomic and Security Review Commission, quoted in David Tweed, “ChinaTakes Nuclear Weapons Undersea Away from Prying Eyes,” Bloomberg Business,Dec. 8, 2014.232 “results of decades”: Select Committee, U.S. Congress, Report, 1999, http://www.house.gov/coxreport/chapfs/over.html.233 a vast enterprise in China: Nir Kshetri, The Rapidly Transforming Chinese High-Technology Industry and Market (London: Chandos, 2008), 92.233 By 2007, Paul Strassmann: “China Has .75M ‘Zombie Computers’ in U.S.,” UPI,Sept. 17, 2007.234 cyber attack had harvested: David E. Sanger and Julie Hirschfeld Davis, “HackersMay Have Obtained Names,” New York Times, June 11, 2015.234 “Those records are”: Baker, “Michael Hayden Says U.S. Is Easy Prey for Hackers.”235 any attempt to “monopolize”: Patrick Goodenough, “Chinese President in VeiledWarning to the US: Don’t Try to ‘Monopolize Regional Affairs,’ ” CNS News,May 22, 2014.236 Chinese intelligence maintains: Former U.S. intelligence officer stationed inHong Kong who requested anonymity, interview with author.236 “hostile territory”: Drumheller, interview with author.chapter 23 A Single Point of Failure238 “the single point of failure”: Gellman, “Code Name ‘Verax.’ ”239 “Snowden thinks he is smart”: Morell, Great War of Our Time, 285.239 “The purpose of my [Hong Kong]”: Rusbridger and MacAskill, “I, Spy.”240 “This guy”: Ibid.240–241 “It was a nervous period”: Ibid.242 “I’m not going to”: Dave Boyer, “Obama on Snowden: ‘I’m Not Going to BeScrambling Jets to Get a 29-Year-Old Hacker,’ ” Washington Times, June 27,2013.243 “huge strategic setback”: Harper, Kerbaj, and Shipman, “British Spies Betrayedto Russians and Chinese.”243 Adding insult to injury: Vanden Heuvel and Cohen, “Snowden Speaks.”Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 3259/30/16 8:13 AM326 | Notes to pages 252–280chapter 24 Off to Moscow247 “They talk about Russia”: Bamford and De Chant, “Edward Snowden on CyberWarfare.”247 Before flying to Moscow: Stone, interview with author.248 $1 million: Mike Fleming Jr., “Oliver Stone Buys Edward Snowden RussianLawyer’s ‘Novel’ About Asylum-Seeking Whistleblower,” Deadline, June 10,2014.249 “I have been trying”: Bamford, “Edward Snowden.”249 “There is only one door”: Gotta, e-mail exchange with author.250 “A special operation”: Gridasov, Yavlyansky, and Gorkovskaya, “Secret Servicesin Moscow with WikiLeaks Conducted Operation Snowden.”251 “If they [the U.S. government]”: Vanden Heuvel and Cohen, “Snowden Speaks.”251 Over a hundred reporters: Irina Galushka, interview with author.251 A statement posted: “Statement from Edward Snowden in Moscow,” https://WikiLeaks.org/Statement-from-Edward-Snowden-in.html.252 Sarah Harrison, Snowden’s companion: Corbett, “How a Snowdenista Kept theNSA Leaker Hidden in a Moscow Airport.”252 So either the rule: The maximum stay is listed on the hotel’s website, http://www.v-exp.ru/en/price/.253 “It was a total vanishing act”: Piskunov, interview with author.Chapter 25 Through the Looking Glass254 “There’s definitely a deep state”: Vanden Heuvel and Cohen, “Snowden Speaks.”255 according to Cherkashin: Cherkashin, interview with author.258 Pelton had left the NSA: George E. Curry, “Ex-intelligence Expert Guilty ofEspionage,” Chicago Tribune, June 6, 1986.chapter 26 The Handler261 “As for [Snowden’s] communication”: Kucherena interview, Shevardnadze,“Snowden Believes He Did Everything Right.”261 learned from a Russian researcher: Vassili Sonkine, interview with author.261 When I had been investigating: Edward Jay Epstein, The Annals of UnsolvedCrime (Brooklyn: Melville House, 2013), 209–40.262 “I don’t know him”: Lugovoy, interview with author.264 It was rare: The vast majority of the fifteen American defectors to the SovietUnion in the Cold War, including Joel Barr, Morris and Lona Cohen, Victor Hamilton,Edward Lee Howard, George Koval, Bernon Mitchell, William Martin, IsaiahOggins, Alfred Sarant, Robert E. Webster, and Flora Wovschin, were involvedin espionage. The remaining three, Harold M. Koch, a Catholic priest protestingthe Vietnam War; Arnold Lockshin, a Communist Party organizer; and LeeHarvey Oswald, a U.S. marine, defected for idealistic principles. All were givenasylum, and two, Webster and Oswald, redefected to the United States.265 “It was totally bizarre”: Lokshina, interview with author. Also, “Meeting EdwardEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 3269/30/16 8:13 AMNotes to pages 281–293 | 327Snowden,” Dispatches, July 13, 2015, https://www.hrw.org/news/2013/07/12/dispatches-meeting-edward-snowden.265 “I will be submitting”: “Statement by Edward Snowden,” July 12, 2013, https://WikiLeaks.org/Statement-by-Edward-Snowden-to.html.265 “When I accepted the case”: Kucherena, interview with author.265 Kucherena had personally approved: Shevardnadze, interview with author.chapter 27 Snowden’s Choices272 Presidential Policy Directive 20: Greenwald, No Place to Hide, 75.272 to trace the theft: Michael Hayden, interview with author.273 “For our enemies”: Morell, Great War of Our Time, 294.274 “I had a special level”: Snowden and Taylor, “Are You a Traitor?”277 “You should remain anonymous”: Burrough, Ellison, and Andrews, “SnowdenSaga.”279 He was also willing: Snowden and Taylor, “Are You a Traitor?”280 “The mission’s already accomplished”: Gellman, “Edward Snowden, AfterMonths of NSA Revelations, Says His Mission’s Accomplished.”chapter 28 The Espionage Source281 “The government’s investigation failed”: Bamford, “Edward Snowden.”282 “If I were providing information”: Transcript of interview with Snowden inMoscow, Rusbridger and MacAskill, “I, Spy.”282 Pelton, for example: Victor Cherkashin, interview with author.283 “This debriefing could not”: Intelligence source who requested anonymity,interview with author.285 Mike Rogers, the chairman: “Congressman Says Snowden Planned Escape toChina,” UPI, June 16, 2013.285 “a known unknown”: Donald Rumsfeld, press conference at NATO headquarters,Brussels, Belgium, June 6, 2002.chapter 29 The “War on Terror” After Snowden287 “Because of a number”: Amy Davidson, “Don’t Blame Edward Snowden for theParis Attacks,” New Yorker, Nov. 19, 2015.287 On the evening of: David Gauthier-Villars, “Paris Attacks Show Cracks inFrance’s Counterterrorism Effort,” Wall Street Journal, Nov. 23, 2015.289 According to a declassified: Charlie Savage, “NSA Discloses Inspector GeneralReport,” New York Times, Feb. 16, 2016.289 “the number one source”: “NSA Slides Explain the PRISM Data-Collection Program,”Washington Post, June 6, 2013.290 according to the testimony: Ellen Nakashima, “Officials: Surveillance ProgramsFoiled More Than 50 Terrorist Plots,” Washington Post, June 18, 2013. Details offour of the plots were then released by the House Select Committee on Intelligence,Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 3279/30/16 8:13 AM328 | Notes to pages 293–299http://intelligence.house.gov/1-four-declassified-examples-more-50-attacks-20-countries-thwarted-nsa-collection-under-fisa-section.290 Grand Central station: Mark Hosenball, “U.S. NSA Internet Spying Foiled Plotto Attack New York Subways: Sources,” Reuters, June 7, 2013.290 provided the “critical lead”: Marshall Erwin, “Connecting the Dots,” U.S. SenateCommittee on the Judiciary, Jan. 13, 2014,.290 “I can tell you”: Rogers quoted in Ed Pilkington and Nicholas Watt, “NSA SurveillancePlayed Little Role in Foiling Terror Plots, Experts Say,” Guardian, June12, 2013.290 The third NSA program: Glenn Greenwald, “XKeyscore: NSA Tool Collects‘Nearly Everything a User Does on the Internet,’ ” Guardian, July 31, 2013.291 Further enabling furtive Internet: Appelbaum, “Edward Snowden Interview.”291 These precise tips: Joseph Menn, “Exclusive: Secret Contract Tied NSA andSecurity Industry Pioneer,” Reuters, Dec. 20, 2013.291 as Greenwald writes: Greenwald, No Place to Hide, 2.292 “We can’t penetrate”: Rebecca Savransky, “Head Prosecutor of Paris AttacksEncryption Program,” Hill, March 13, 2016.293 “Terrorist organizations”: Morell, Great War of Our Time, 294.293 What further heightened Morell’s concern: Ibid., 315.293 In addition, evidence: Milan Schreuer and Alissa J. Rubin, “Video Found in BelgiumMay Point to a Bigger Plot,” New York Times, Feb. 18, 2016.294 “saw one after another”: Mary Louise Kelly, “NSA: Fallout from Snowden LeaksIsn’t Over, but Info Is Getting Old,” NPR, March 16, 2016.294 “Have I lost capability”: Bill Gertz, “NSA Director: Snowden’s Leaks HelpedTerrorists Avoid Tracking,” Washington Free Beacon, Feb. 24, 2015.epilogue The Snowden Effect295 “Governments can reduce our dignity”: Edward Snowden, “Governments CanReduce Our Dignity to That of Tagged Animals,” Guardian, May 3, 2016.298 published in The New York Times: David E. Sanger and Thom Shanker, “N.S.A.Devises Radio Pathway into Computers,” New York Times, Jan. 14, 2014.298 “Snowden has compromised more”: McConnell interview, King, “Ex-NSA ChiefDetails Snowden’s Hiring at Agency, Booz Allen.”299 a distrustful press: Pilkington and Watt, “NSA Surveillance Played Little Rolein Foiling Terror Plots, Experts Say.” The first “expert” was Michael Dowling, aDenver-based attorney who acted as Zazi’s defense counsel. He said he had noaccess to the undisclosed basis of the government position because Zazi pleadedguilty in 2011. The second expert was David Davis, a British MP, who was in theshadow government of the Conservative Party. He resigned from the shadowgovernment in June 2008, more than a year before the Zazi arrest. In any case,because the PRISM program was a closely held secret, he would not have had,and does not claim to have had, access to it.299 Snowden speaks “truth to power”: Vanden Heuvel and Cohen, “SnowdenSpeaks.”Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 3289/30/16 8:13 AMSelected Bibliographyselected booksAndrew, Christopher. The Sword and the Shield. New York: Basic Books, 2000.Bagley, Tennent H. Spy Wars: Moles, Mysteries, and Deadly Games. New Haven, Conn.:Yale University Press, 2008.Bamford, James. The Puzzle Palace. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1982.Coleman, Gabriella. Hacker, Hoaxer, Whistleblower, Spy: The Many Faces of Anonymous.New York: Verso, 2015.Epstein, Edward Jay. Deception: The Invisible War Between the KGB and the CIA. NewYork: Simon & Schuster, 1989.———. Inquest: The Warren Commission and the Establishment of Truth. New York:Viking Press, 1966.Fitzpatrick, Catherine A. Privacy for Me and Not for Thee: The Movement for InvinciblePersonal Encryption, Radical State Transparency, and the Snowden Hack. New York:Catherine A. Fitzpatrick, 2014.Greenberg, Karen J. Rogue Justice: The Making of the Security State. New York: Crown,2016.Greenwald, Glenn. How Would a Patriot Act? Defending American Values from a PresidentRun Amok. San Francisco: Working Assets, 2006.———. No Place to Hide. New York: Metropolitan Books, 2014.Harding, Luke. The Snowden Files. New York: Vintage, 2014.Hayden, Michael V. Playing to the Edge. New York: Penguin, 2016.Jastrow, Joseph. Fact and Fable in Psychology. Boston: Houghton, Mifflin, 1900.Kahn, David. The Codebreakers. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1967.Lucas, Edward. The Snowden Operation. Seattle: Amazon Digital Services, 2015.Morell, Michael J. The Great War of Our Time. New York: Twelve, 2015.Sebag- Montefiore, Hugh. Enigma: The Battle for the Code. New York: John Wiley andSons, 2001.Shils, Edward. The Torment of Secrecy: The Background and Consequences of AmericanSecurity Policies. Chicago: Free Press, 1956.Turner, Stansfield. Secrecy and Democracy: The CIA in Transition. New York: HoughtonMifflin, 1985.Weiner, Tim. Legacy of Ashes. New York: Doubleday, 2007.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 3299/30/16 8:13 AM330 | Selected BibliographyWoodward, Bob. Veil: The Secret Wars of the CIA, 1981– 1987. New York: Simon &Schuster, 2005.selected articlesAppelbaum, Jacob. “Edward Snowden Interview: The NSA and Its Willing Helpers.”Spiegel Online, July 8, 2013.Baker, Gerard. “Michael Hayden Says U.S. Is Easy Prey for Hackers.” Wall Street Journal,June 22, 2015.Bamford, James. “Edward Snowden: The Untold Story.” Wired, Aug. 2014.Bradsher, Keith. “Hasty Exit Started with Pizza Inside a Hong Kong Hideout.” New YorkTimes, June 24, 2013.Burrough, Bryan, Sarah Ellison, and Suzanna Andrews. “The Snowden Saga.” VanityFair, May 2014.Chen, Te- Ping, and Ken Brown. “Snowden’s Options for Refuge Narrow.” Wall StreetJournal, June 10, 2013.Corbett, Sara. “How a Snowdenista Kept the NSA Leaker Hidden in a Moscow Airport.”Vogue, Feb. 19, 2015.De, Rajesh. “Former NSA Lawyer on ‘Harm’ of Edward Snowden’s Revelations.”Bloomberg, July 27, 2015.Gellman, Barton. “Code Name ‘Verax’: Snowden, in Exchanges with Post Reporter,Made Clear He Knew Risks.” Washington Post, June 9, 2013.— — — . “Edward Snowden, After Months of NSA Revelations, Says His Mission’sAccomplished.” Washington Post, Dec. 23, 2013.Gellman, Barton, and Greg Miller. “ ‘Black Budget’ Summary Details U.S. Spy Network’sSuccesses, Failures, and Objectives.” Washington Post, Aug. 25, 2013.Gertz, Bill. “Counterspies Hunt Russian Mole Inside National Security Agency.” WashingtonTimes, Dec. 1, 2010.Greenberg, Andy. “These Are the Emails Snowden Sent to First Introduce His Epic NSALeaks.” Wired, Oct. 13, 2014.Greenwald, Glenn, Laura Poitras, and Ewen MacAskill. “Edward Snowden: The WhistleblowerBehind the NSA Surveillance Revelations.” Guardian, June 9, 2013.Gridasov, Andrei, Igor Yavlyansky, and Mary Gorkovskaya. “Secret Services in Moscowwith WikiLeaks Conducted Operation Snowden.” Izvestia, June 23, 2013.Harris, Shane. “What Was Edward Snowden Doing in India?” Foreign Policy, Jan. 13,2014.Hastings, Michael. “Julian Assange: The Rolling Stone Interview.” Rolling Stone, Jan.18, 2012.Hill, Kashmir. “How ACLU Attorney Ben Wizner Became Snowden’s Lawyer.” Forbes,March 10, 2014.Hosenball, Mark. “NSA Contractor Hired Snowden Despite Concerns About ResumeDiscrepancies.” Reuters, June 20, 2013.King, Rachael. “Ex- NSA Chief Details Snowden’s Hiring at Agency, Booz Allen.” WallStreet Journal, Feb. 4, 2014.Lam, Lana. “Whistle- Blower Edward Snowden Talks to the South China Morning Post,”South China Morning Post, June 23, 2013.Lee, Micah. “Ed Snowden Taught Me to Smuggle Secrets Past Incredible Danger.” Intercept,Oct. 28, 2014.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 3309/30/16 8:13 AMSelected Bibliography | 331Leopold, Jason. “Inside Washington’s Quest to Bring Down Edward Snowden.” Vice,June 4, 2015.Miller, Greg. “U.S. Officials Scrambled to Nab Snowden.” Washington Post, June 14,2014.Mullin, Joe. “NSA Leaker Ed Snowden’s Life on Ars Technica.” Ars Technica, June 13,2013.Packer, George. “The Holder of Secrets.” New Yorker, Oct. 20, 2014.Reitman, Janet. “Snowden and Greenwald.” Rolling Stone, Dec. 4, 2013.Risen, James. “Snowden Says He Took No Secret Files to Russia.” New York Times, Oct.17, 2013.Rusbridger, Alan, and Ewen MacAskill. “I, Spy: Edward Snowden in Exile.” Guardian,July 18, 2014.Sandvik, Runa A. “That One Time I Threw a CryptoParty with Edward Snowden.”Forbes, May 27, 2014.Schmitt, Eric. “C.I.A. Warning on Snowden in ’09 Said to Slip Through the Cracks.”New York Times, Oct. 10, 2013.vanden Heuvel, Katrina, and Stephen F. Cohen. “Snowden Speaks: A Sneak Peek at anExclusive Interview.” Nation, Oct. 10, 2014.Woolsey, R. James. “Why We Spy on Our Allies.” Wall Street Journal, March 17, 2000.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 3319/30/16 8:13 AMEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 3329/30/16 8:13 AMIndex<TK> 16pagesEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 3339/30/16 8:13 AM334 | IndexEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 3349/30/16 8:13 AMIndex | 335Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 3359/30/16 8:13 AM336 | IndexEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 3369/30/16 8:13 AMIndex | 337Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 3379/30/16 8:13 AM338 | IndexEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 3389/30/16 8:13 AMIndex | 339Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 3399/30/16 8:13 AM340 | IndexEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 3409/30/16 8:13 AMIndex | 341Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 3419/30/16 8:13 AM342 | IndexEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 3429/30/16 8:13 AMIndex | 343Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 3439/30/16 8:13 AM344 | IndexEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 3449/30/16 8:13 AMIndex | 345Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 3459/30/16 8:13 AM346 | IndexEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 3469/30/16 8:13 AMIndex | 347Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 3479/30/16 8:13 AM348 | IndexEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 3489/30/16 8:13 AMIndex | 349Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 3499/30/16 8:13 AMEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 3509/30/16 8:13 AMillustration creditsEdward Snowden on video shown in Hong Kong: AP Photo/Kin CheungNSA base on Oahu: Courtesy Ena and Ines TalakicBarton Gellman: AP Photo/J. Scott ApplewhiteGlenn Greenwald and Laura Poitras in Hong Kong: AP Photo/John MinchilloMira hotel: Courtesy Ena and Ines TalakicRoom 1014 at the Mira: Courtesy Ena and Ines TalakicKeith Alexander: AP Photo/J. Scott ApplewhiteVladimir Putin: AP Photo/Ivan SekretarevJulian Assange: Anthony Devlin/PA WireRussian airline Aeroflot: Courtesy Ena and Ines TalakicMichael Hayden: Rex Features via AP ImagesU.S. base at Yokota: Courtesy Ena and Ines TalakicSnowden’s home in Hawaii: Courtesy Ena and Ines TalakicLindsay Mills: Luis SilosNSA headquarters: AP Photo/Patrick Semansky, FileJacob Appelbaum: Axel Heimken via AP ImagesRuna Sandvik: AP Photo/John LocherCryptoParty: Courtesy Ena and Ines TalakicAnatoly Kucherena: AP Photo/Alexander ZemlianichenkoSnowden’s first appearance in Russia: Human Rights Watch, Tanya LokshinaAnna Chapman: AP Photo/Sergei Karpukhin, Pool, FilePoitras, Greenwald, and Mills: Kevin Winter/Getty ImagesEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 3519/30/16 8:13 AMEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 3529/30/16 8:13 AMa note about the authorEdward Jay Epstein graduated from Cornell University andreceived a Ph.D. from Harvard. His undergraduate thesis on thesearch for political truth became a best- selling book, Inquest: TheWarren Commission and the Establishment of Truth. His doctoraldissertation on television news was excerpted in The New Yorkerand published as News from Nowhere. After teaching political scienceat MIT and UCLA, he became a full- time author. He won theprestigious Financial Times/Booz Allen & Hamilton Global BusinessBook Award for both best biography and best business bookfor Dossier: The Secret History of Armand Hammer. He has writteninvestigative pieces for The New Yorker, Vanity Fair, The Atlantic,and The New York Review of Books. He lives in New York City.Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 3539/30/16 8:13 AMEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 3549/30/16 8:13 AMa note on the typeThe text of this book was set in a typeface called Aldus, designed bythe celebrated typographer Hermann Zapf in 1952– 53. Based onthe classical proportion of the popular Palatino type family, Alduswas originally adapted for Linotype composition as a slightlylighter version that would read better in smaller sizes.Hermann Zapf was born in Nuremberg, Germany, in 1918. Hehas created many other well known typefaces including Comenius,Hunt Roman, Marconi, Melior, Michelangelo, Optima, Saphir, Sistina,Zapf Book and Zapf Chancery.Composed by North Market Street Graphics, Lancaster, PennsylvaniaPrinted and bound by Berryville Graphics, Berryville, VirginiaDesigned by Maggie HindersEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 3559/30/16 8:13 AMEpst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 3569/30/16 8:13 AM