File 024256
Harvard Law School Cyberlaw Course Syllabus: Internet & Society (File 024256)
Syllabus for a January 2017 intensive cyberlaw course co-taught by Professors Jonathan Zittrain and Joi Ito at Harvard Law School, covering Internet governance, copyright, privacy, and digital regulation.
Summary
This document is the syllabus for a nine-day intensive course titled 'Internet & Society: The Technologies and Politics of Control' taught at Harvard Law School in January 2017. Co-instructors Jonathan Zittrain and Joi Ito (Director of MIT Media Lab) designed the course to provide rigorous introduction to cyberlaw, exploring online architecture, Internet governance, copyright issues, privacy, surveillance, net neutrality, and artificial intelligence. The course includes daily sessions, guest lectures from prominent technologists and policy experts, and requires students to submit a 12-15 page policy recommendation or project proposal addressing a current Internet issue.
Internet & Society: The Technologies and Politics of ControlProfessor Jonathan Zittrain co-taught with Professor Joi Ito, Director of the MIT Media LabHarvard Law SchoolWinter 2017Mon-Fri10:30am-noon; 12:45pm-2pmMilstein West ABSyllabusI. Course DescriptionThis course offers a rigorous introduction to the field of cyberlaw. We will investigate theevolving nature of online architecture and activities, and the ways in which law has been, andwill be, leveraged to influence them.Course themes include the complex interaction between Internet governance organizations andsovereign states, the search for balance between the ease of disseminating information onlineand the interest of copyright holders, privacy advocates, and others in controlling thatdissemination, and the roles of intermediaries and platforms in shaping what people can andcannot do online. The course will include an array of learning and teaching methods. Studentswill be expected to participate in a variety of activities.II. Class ScheduleAfternoonSessionMorningSessionThe class meets every day from January 3rd to January 13th inMilstein West AB. Each day will be divided into three phases: themorning session from 10:30am to noon, lunch from noon to 12:45pm,and the afternoon session from 12:45pm to 2pm. Lunch will beprovided.A more detailed schedule of the topics we will be covering each dayfollows below.Topics (2 per day other than the last day)Day 1: Introduction, Right to Be Forgotten and JurisdictionDay 2: Copyright, DRM debate between Professor Ito and Professor Zittrain (afternoon session)HOUSE OVERSIGHT 024256Day 3: CryptocurrencyDay 4: Private Infrastructures for Government Surveillance, John DeLong/Bruce Schneier talk(morning session)Day 5: Net Neutrality and Internet Architecture, Dialogue with Andy Ellis (afternoon session)Day 6: Weaponized Social, Open discussion with John Palfrey (morning session)Day 7: Free vs. Proprietary Code and Content, Dialogue with David Clark (afternoon session)Day 8: Governance, Artificial IntelligenceDay 9: ConclusionIII. Class RequirementsThe purpose of this class is to give students a sense of the historical battles of the Internet, whatdifferent actors were thinking, what they were trying to accomplish, and what levers they pulledin order to select for specific outcomes. Students should apply what they have learned fromhistorical examples to a current Internet issue discussed in class and describe in a 12-15 pagepaper what a viable solution might look like. Solutions could take the form of a policyrecommendation, project proposal, or code. The paper or project proposal will be due onFriday, January 20th, and may be submitted by email to Samantha Bates atsbates@law.harvard.edu.IV. Class MaterialsThere is no required textbook for this class. All readings will be available online on the classH20 playlist: https://h2o.law.harvard.edu/playlists/51511.We will have a slack channel for the class. Please click on the following link to sign up:https://internet-society2017.slack.com/signup.Students should bring their laptops to class to use for daily activities, but all electrical devicesmust remain off during lectures.V. General InformationProfessor Zittrain and Professor Ito will be available for group office hours after class on thefollowing dates:• Wednesday, January 4th from 2:15-3:15pm in Milstein West.• Monday, January 9th from 2:15-3:15pm in Milstein West.• Wednesday, January 11th from 2:15-3:15pm in Milstein West.HOUSE OVERSIGHT 024257For other general scheduling/appointment questions, please contact:Amanda McMahanAssistant to Professor ZittrainOffice Phone:Email:Office location: Griswold Hall, 5th floor, Room #505Yuko BarnabyAssistant to Media Lab Director ItoOffice Phone:Email:Office location: MIT Media Lab, E-14, Director's Office 245For course related (readings/paper) questions, please contact:Samantha BatesResearch AssociateEmail:Natalie SaltielCoordinating Editor for the Journal of Design and Science (JoDS)MIT Media LabEmail: ________________________________For other information about the class, please contact:Shailin ThomasTeaching FellowEmail:Jordi WeinstockVisiting ScholarEmail:HOUSE OVERSIGHT 024258Reading AssignmentsDay 1: IntroductionWelcome! We aspire to the implausible: a nine-day introduction to the unusual dynamics of theworld's digital space, sufficient for a strategic understanding of what makes it difficult (but farfrom impossible) to regulate or shape; who's trying to do it nonetheless; and how such effortshave fared over the past twenty years, with an eye towards lessons for influencing the spaceand the behavior within it today.In addition to offering some frameworks for thinking about Internet architecture and policy, andthe curious open and generative nature of the phenomenon, we will delve into the net as acontingently global phenomenon, and the way that complicates regulation by traditionalsovereigns. Our case study will be the current debates around implementation of Europe's "rightto be forgotten" in search engine results. As you complete the readings, you might see howyou'd answer the question of what a state like France's view should be towards the scope of itsRTBF regulation, and whether the kind of "zoning" described in the Cato Institute article fromthirteen years ago (!), is realizable and desirable.Readings:• C.P. Snow, "The Rede Lecture: The Two Cultures," (1959) pages 1-9http://s-f-walker.org.uk/pubsebooks/2cultures/Rede-lecture-2-cultures.pdf archived athttps://perma.cc/XB6F-N9K8.• John Perry Barlow, "A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace," ElectronicFrontier Foundation (February 8, 1996) https://www.eff.org/cyberspace-independencearchived at https://perma.cc/H2CZ-N2EX.• Locke, Levine, Searles, & Weinberger, The Cluetrain Manifesto: 95 Theses (1999)http://www.cluetrain.com/book/95-theses.html archived at https://perma.cc/2BLT-6ZEL.• Jonathan Zittrain, The Future of the Internet and How to Stop It. New Haven: 2008https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/4455262/Zittrain Future%20of%20the%201nternet.pdf?sequence=1 archived at https://perma.cc/NM9D-7Y2V.o Read pages 1-5, 7-9, 57-61, 63-65, 67-71.• Yochai Benkler, The Wealth of Networks. New Haven: 2006.http://www.benkler.org/Benkler Wealth Of Networks.pdf archived athttps://perma.cc/BC4A-96KP.o Read pages 154 (beginning "Imagine a world") - 161Jurisdiction• Jonathan Zittrain, "Be Careful What You Ask For: Reconciling a Global Internet andLocal Law," WHO RULES THE NET?, Cato Institute (2003)http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/sites/cyber.law.harvard.edu/files/2003-03.pdf archived athttps://perma.cc/3JE9-GM3R.HOUSE OVERSIGHT 024259[OPTIONAL: Right to Be Forgotten readings]• Zoe Bedell, "Google to France: 'Forget You' - An Update on the Right to Be Forgotten"Lawfare (May 25, 2016)https://www.lawfareblog.com/google-france-forget-you-%E2%80%93-update-right-be-forgotten archived at https://perma.cc/W9EX-5AGZ.• Google Spain v. Mario Costeja Gonzalez ECJ opinion (May 13, 2014)http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document print.jsf?doclang=EN&docid=152065archived at https://perma.cc/3ARS-3X04.o Read paragraphs 89-99• Brendan van Alsenoy and Marieke Koekkoek, The Extraterritorial Reach of the EU's'Right to Be forgotten' (January 19, 2015). CiTiP Working paper 20/2015. Available atSS RN: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract id =2551838 archived athttps://perma.cc/B3SF-YJ3W.o Read pages 3-22Day 2: CopyrightCopyright was once thought of as the defining battle of consumer networking. Academictechnologies brought into the mainstream made it trivial to prepare and distribute perfect copiesof copyrighted work without permission -- and the comparatively powerful organizationsrepresenting copyright holders saw this as an existential threat.We will read some of the "grim joy" experienced by Internet freedom types in dancing on thegrave of copyright in the mid-1990s -- and immerse in some of the law and policy changeseffected in the United States to deal with the problem without running up against the equities ofrapidly-growing intermediaries of online and Internet service providers (turns out, there's adifference).The copyright wars revealed a variety of strategies that we'll look at with the benefit of years ofhindsight, including lawsuits against network providers, software makers, and individual usersboth sending and receiving files, as well as technical changes designed to make it more difficultto share items that wish not to be shared. Ultimately we are drawn to the question of whetherthe wars were won by one side or another, or whether it's more accurate to say that they simplyfaded away. What issues today feel make-or-break, yet could simply fade rather than beresolved, and why?We'll end the day with a peek into, and practice of, a current intense if obscure debate: that ofwhether digital rights management hooks should be placed into standards for Web browsers.Readings:• John Perry Barlow, "The Economy of Ideas," Wired (March 1994)http://archive.wired.com/wired/archive/2.03/economy.ideas.html?topic=&topic set=archived at https://perma.cc/P82S-RZP3.HOUSE OVERSIGHT 024260• Matthew Green, Napster Opens Pandora's Box: Examining How File-Sharing ServicesThreaten the Enforcement of Copyright on the Internet, 63 Oh. St. L. J. 799 (2002)http://moritzlaw.osu.edu/students/groups/oslyfiles/2012/03/63.2.green .pdf archived athttps://perma.cc/H77J-TN43.• Brad Hill, "The iTunes Influence, Part I: How Apple Changed the Face of the MusicMarketplace," En gadget (April 29, 2013)https://www.engadget.com/2013/04/29/the-itunes-influence-part-one/ archived athttps://perma.cc/MEU4-W5N9.• David Kravets, "10 Years Later, Misunderstood DMCA is the Law That Saved the Web,"Wired (October 27, 2008) https://www.wired.com/2008/10/ten-years-later/ archived athttps://perma.cc/VH2T-7S7V.• Lawrence Lessig, The Creative Commons, 55 Fla. L. Rev. 763 (2003)http://homepages.law.asu.edu/—dkarjala/OpposingCopyrightExtension/commentary/LessigCreativeCommonsFlaLRev2003.htm archived at https://perma.cc/T7UD-JHYZ.• Alex Davies, "The EPA Opposes Rules That Could've Exposed VW's Cheating," Wired(September 18, 2015)https://www.wired.com/2015/09/epa-opposes-rules-couldve-exposed-vws-cheating/archived at https://perma.cc/W4RK-Q6QJ.DRM and HTML5 background readings:• "Information about W3C and Encrypted Media Extensions (EME)" W3C (March 2016)https://www.w3.org/2016/03/EME-factsheet.html archived athttps://perma.cc/4ZPR-DXTA.• Peter Bright, "DRM in HTML5 is a victory for the open Web, not a defeat," Ars Technica(May 10, 2013)http://arstechnica.com/business/2013/05/drm-in-htm15-is-a-victory-for-the-open-web-not-a-defeat/ archived at https://perma.cc/UM8C-NFPV.Day 3: CryptocurrencyOne view of the progression of digital technology has been roughly from amateur toprofessional, from open to closed, and from chaotic to ordered -- as the early successes fromleft field of Google, Facebook, and Twitter enter publicly-traded adulthood. At the ripe year of2017, are there still digital disruptions to be had?The phenomenon (and increasing literal value) of cryptocurrency -- and, for that matter, thefoundational blockchain technologies on which it can be based -- seems to indicate that thereare still surprises from left field. What does the rise of cryptocurrency tell us about the state ofcyberspace, and what should we expect -- and hope for -- next?Readings:IntroductionHOUSE OVERSIGHT 024261• Coin Center, Blockchain 101, https://coincenter.org/learn archived athttps://perma.cc/M2TZ-B9YX.• Eli Dourado and Jerry Brito, "The New Pa!grave Dictionary of Economics:cryptocurrency," Online Edition, 2014http://coincenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/cryptocurrency-article.pdf archived athttps://perma.cc/3YFE-QS5P.• Joel Monegro, "The Blockchain Application Stack"http://www.coindesk.com/blockchain-application-stack/ archived athttps://perma.cc/4E3V-SCAL.[OPTIONAL: for a more in depth technical introduction to Bitcoin]• Michael Nielson, "How the Bitcoin Protocol Actually works"http://www.michaelnielsen.org/ddi/how-the-bitcoin-protocol-actually-works/ archived athttps://perma.cc/C2QJ-YFEY.Bitcoin & the Blockchain• Joi Ito, "Why Bitcoin is and isn't like the Internet"https://joi.ito.com/weblog/2015/01/23/why-bitcoin-is-.html archived athttps://perma.cc/CBE8-2UXQ.• Joi Ito, "Why anti-money laundering laws and poorly designed copyright laws are similarand should be revised," (March 12, 2016)http://pubpub.ito.com/pub/dmca-drm-aml-kyc-backdoors archived athttps://perma.cc/7T7T-UPJK.• Rachel O'Dwyer, "The Revolution Will Not Be Decentralized: Blockchains," CommonTransition (June 11, 2015)http://commonstransition.org/the-revolution-will-not-be-decentralised-blockchains/archived at https://perma.cc/MNP7-JZZL.• Vili Lehdonvirta and Edward Castronova, Virtual Economies: Design and Analysis. 2014.MIT Press.o Read Chapter 10: Money• Raskin, Max and Yermack, David, Digital Currencies, Decentralized Ledgers, and theFuture of Central Banking (May 1, 2016). Peter Conti-Brown & Rosa Lastra (eds.),Research Handbook on Central Banking, Edward Elgar Publishing, Spring 2017,Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2773973 archived athttps://perma.cc/FTC3-M6EF.Ethereum• Vitalik Buterin, "What is Ethereum?," Coin Centerhttps://coincenter.org/entry/what-is-ethereum archived at https://perma.cc/WKN4-33XF.Smart Contracts• Houman Shadab,"What are Smart Contracts and What Can We do with Them?," CoinCenter (December 15, 2014)HOUSE OVERSIGHT 024262https://coincenter.org/entry/what-are-smart-contracts-and-what-can-we-do-with-themarchived at https://perma.cc/BH6T-J6S7.[OPTIONAL]• Arvind Narayanan; "What Happened to the Crypt° Dream, Part 1," Co-published by theIEEE Computer and Reliability Societies (March/April 2013)http://randomwalker.info/publications/crypto-dream-part1.pdf archived athttps://perma.cc/DX8U-QJ5A.• Arvind Narayanan, "What Happened to the Crypt° Dream?, Part 2," Co-published by theIEEE and Reliability Societies (May/June 2013)http://randomwalker.info/publications/crypto-dream-part2.pdf archived athttps://perma.cc/F482-84AY.• Lawrence Lessig Code 2.0 lecture from COALA Blockchain Workshop:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcYJTIbhYFO.• Chelsea Barabas and Ethan Zuckerman, "Can Bitcoin be used for Good?," The Atlantic(April 7, 2016)http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2016/04/bitcoin-hype/477141/ archived athttps://perma.cc/V94Q-CCP3.Day 4: Private Infrastructures for Government SurveillanceDigital privacy has at times been understood as privacy against corporate intrusion (think adnetworks); against government (think the various government intelligence-gatheringestablishments around the world); and against one another (think drones as well as morepedestrian technologies that empower people to document facts about, or even doxx, eachother).This session will look at the second form of surveillance, especially as effectuated through thecooperation or compulsion of private intermediaries. How successful is such surveillance, andwill it continue to be effective as the public reacts by potentially adopting privacy-enhancingtools? How successful do we want it to be, and how might frameworks agreeable withinjurisdictions that embrace the rule of law be used or abused within those that do not?Readings:• David O'Brien, Matt Olsen, Bruce Schneier, and Jonathan Zittrain, et al. "Don't Panic.Making Progress on the 'Going Dark' Debate," The Berkman Center for Internet &Society at Harvard University (Feb 1, 2016)https://cyber.law.harvard.edu/pubrelease/dont-panic/Dont Panic Making Progress onGoing Dark Debate.pdf archived at https://perma.cc/NT9M-ELAG.• John Cassidy, "Lessons from Apple vs. The F.B.I.," The New Yorker (March 29, 2016)http://www.newyorker.com/news/john-cassidy/lessons-from-apple-versus-the-f-b-iarchived at https://perma.cc/282P-A7MS.HOUSE OVERSIGHT 024263• Susan Landau, Testimony for House Judiciary Committee Hearing on "The EncryptionTightrope: Balancing Americans' Security and Privacy" (March 1, 2016)https://judiciary.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Landau-Written-Testimony.pdfarchived at https://perma.cc/N9D9-JTYQ.• Bruce Schneier, "Data Is a Toxic Asset, So Why Not Throw It Out?," Schneier onSecurity (March 1, 2016)https://www.schneier.com/essays/archives/2016/03/data is a toxic asse.html archivedat https://perma.cc/7NUL-W5YJ.• Stewart Baker, "Why the NSA Needs Your Phone Calls...and why you (probably)shouldn't worry about it," Foreign Policy (June 6, 2013)http://foreignpolicy.com/2013/06/06/why-the-nsa-needs-your-phone-calls/ archived athttps://perma.cc/YE3N-TSWU.• [OPTIONAL] Harold Abelson et al., "Keys Under Doormats: Mandating insecurity byrequiring government access to all data and communications," CSAIL (Jul 7, 2015).https://www.schneier.com/academic/paperfiles/paper-keys-under-doormats-CSAIL.pdfarchived at https://perma.cc/2L3U-QST8.Day 5: Internet Architecture/Net NeutralityWe increasingly assume the availability of commodity networking -- a flat fee for access -- evenas the way in which we experience the Internet is evolving through a curious microeconomics, amishmash of policies designed to subsidize or regulate access, and a sometime ability toarbitrage around arrangements through technologies to facilitate access sharing and virtualtunneling.How is Internet access likely to evolve, and what choices exist for polities with particular idealsabout how it should work?Discussion will include Andy Ellis, Berkman Klein Center Fellow and CSO of Akamai, one of themost important companies that people haven't heard of.Readings:Net Neutrality• [FOR REFERENCE] Net Neutrality timeline, Public Knowledge:http://whatisnetneutrality.org/timeline archived at https://perma.cc/L8JE-QYP8.• Tim Wu, Network Neutrality, Broadband Discrimination. Journal of Telecommunicationsand High Technology Law, Vol. 2, p. 141 (2003). Available at SSRN:https://ssrn.com/abstract=388863 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.388863 archived athttps://perma.cc/X856-RWSC.o Read the introduction and Part I A, pages 141-147.• Tim Wu and Christopher Yoo, "Keeping the Internet Neutral?: Tim Wu and ChristopherYoo Debate," Federal Communications Law Journal. 59 (2007), pp. 575-592HOUSE OVERSIGHT 024264https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract id=953989 archived athttps://perma.cc/FHE3-XUED.• Tom Wheeler, "This is How We Will Ensure Net Neutrality," Wired (February 4, 2015)https://www.wired.com/2015/02/fcc-chairman-wheeler-net-neutrality/ archived athttps://perma.cc/C8DE-2PJB.Zero-rating• Jeremy Malcolm, Corynne Mcsherry, and Kit Walsh, "Zero rating: What It Is and WhyYou Should Care," Electronic Frontier Foundation (February 18, 2016)https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2016/02/zero-rating-what-it-is-why-you-should-carearchived at https://perma.ccN6TW-2QAG.• Arturo J Carrillo, Having Your Cake and Eating it Too? Zero-Rating, Net Neutrality andInternational Law (March 6, 2016). 19 Stan. Tech. L. Rev. 364 (2016). Available atSS RN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2746447 archived at https://perma.cc/9Z28-X6A4.o Read part IV (pages 418-428).Internet Architecture• Mike Masnick, "Can We Kill This Ridiculous Shill-Spread Myth That CDNs Violate NetNeutrality? They Don't," TechDirt (August 13, 2014)https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20140812/04314528184/can-we-kill-this-ridiculous-sh ill-spread-myth-that-cdns-violate-net-neutrality-they-dont.shtml archived athttps://perma.cc/YK3D-3BQG.Day 6: Weaponized SocialThe time when the solution to bad speech could be advanced as simply more speech mightseem quaint. The famously libertarian Electronic Frontier Foundation recently released a whitepaper in which it acknowledged a line between a clash of ideas and flat-out harassment, withthe latter causing less rather than more robust debate. Separately, concerns about outrightfalse news that spreads virally have inspired calls for action by intermediaries like Facebook -- aself-described technology, rather than media, company.Applying lessons from the conflicts of the past two decades online, how might we agree upon avision for social networking even if we disagree on many substantive issues to be debatedthere, and what are the roles, if any, of regulators and private platforms in establishingboundaries on behavior online through code or legal sanction?Is it more difficult to agree on a vision is our media is no longer about the battlefield or the realworld but is the battlefield and the real world?HOUSE OVERSIGHT 024265Readings:The Problem• Eugene Volokh, "No, there's no 'hate speech' exception to the First Amendment," TheWashington Post (May 7, 2015)https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2015/05/07/no-theres-no-hate-speech-exception-to-the-first-amendment/?utm term =.78330882267d archived athttps://perma.cc/A5ES-HMQE.• Jon Ronson, "How One Stupid Tweet Blew Up Justine Sacco's Life," The New YorkTimes Magazine (February 12, 2015)http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/15/magazine/how-one-stupid-tweet-ruined-justine-saccos-life.html? r=0 archived at https://perma.cc/3AHS-Z9EU.• Adrian Chen, "The Agency," The New York Times Magazine (June 2, 2015)http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/07/magazine/the-agency.html? r=0 archived athttps://perma.cc/BER2-TD6E.• Reeves Wiedeman, "The Sandy Hook Hoax," The New York Magazine (September 5,2016) http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/09/the-sandy-hook-hoax.html archivedat https://perma.cc/T9YD-U8Z9.• Gilad Lotan, "Fake News Is Not the Only Problem," Points (November 22, 2016)https://points.datasociety.net/fake-news-is-not-the-problem-f0Oec8cdfcb#.kwtO1pk4harchived at https://perma.cc/B3FK-FJVX.• Craig Silverman, "How Teens In The Balkans Are Duping Trump Supporters With FakeNews," BuzzFeed (November 3, 2016)https://www.buzzfeed.com/craigsilverman/how-macedonia-became-a-global-hub-for-pro-trump-misinfo?utm term=.n1pEm5kbY#.apomjgWID archived athttps://perma.cc/SB2G-9XUM.• Caitlin Dewey, "Facebook fake-news writer: 'I think Donald Trump is in the White Housebecause of me,- The Washington Post (November 17, 2016)https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2016/11/17/facebook-fake-news-writer-i-think-donald-trump-is-in-the-white-house-because-of-me/?utm term=.e2d9c7b0d5e6 archived at https://perma.cc/B6S4-UBJC.The Search for Solutions• Andy Greenberg, "Inside Google's Internet Justice League and Its AI-Powered War onTrolls," Wired (September 19, 2016)https://www.wired.com/2016/09/inside-googles-internet-justice-league-ai-powered-war-trolls/ archived at https://perma.cc/K56R-MGBX.• Dia Kayyali and Danny O'Brien, "Facing the Challenge of Online Harassment" ElectronicFrontier Foundation (January 8, 2015)https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2015/01/facing-challenge-online-harassment, archived athttps://perma.cc/98RS-L876.• State v. Robert Bishop, 223PA15 (June 10, 2016)https://h2o.law.harvard.edu/collages/42536.HOUSE OVERSIGHT 024266Day 7: Free vs. Proprietary Code and ContentThis day examines quite different models for the development and distribution of software --which can also serve as models for hardware, and for content. What kind of ecosystem,featuring what models, is desirable?We will think about current issues in cybersecurity as a case study in why free vs. proprietarycode might matter, and take up the question of how regulation might be applied when there areno easily identified intermediaries in the production of code.And we will hear from the legendary David Clark, one of the framers of the Internet.Readings:• Richard Stallman, "Original Announcement of the GNU Project," GNU Operating System(September 27, 1983) https://www.gnu.org/gnu/initial-announcement.html archived athttps://perma.cc/2V5W-89P3.• The Free Software Foundation, "What is free software?," GNU Operating Systemhttp://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html archived at https://perma.cc/7884-5ZUR.o [FOR REFERENCE] The Free Software Foundation, "Categories of Free andnonfree software," GNU Operating System:https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/categories.html archived athttps://perma.cc/HH79-6YVX.• Jonathan Zittrain, The Future of the Internet and How to Stop It. New Haven: 2008https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/4455262/Zittrain Future%20of%20the%201nternet.pdf?sequence=1 archived at https://perma.cc/B7RL-JRKK.o Read Chapter 4: Generative Patterns (pages 67-100).• Jeff Atwood, "Tivoization and the GPL," Coding Horror (February 18, 2008),https://blog.codinghorror.com/tivoization-and-the-gpl/ archived athttps://perma.cc/YFQ5-42XW.• Rusty Foster, "The Internet's Telltale Heartbleed," The New Yorker (April 9, 2014)http://www.newyorker.com/tech/elements/the-internets-telltale-heartbleed archived athttps://perma.cc/AC9L-HW34.• Ron Amadeo, "Google's iron grip on Android: Controlling open source by any meansnecessary," Ars Technica (October 20, 2013)http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2013/10/googles-iron-grip-on-android-controlling-open-source-by-any-means-necessary/ archived at https://perma.cc/QKW2-3EQH.• [OPTIONAL] Open Source Licenses: Richard Fontana et. al, A Legal Issues Primer ForOpen Source and Free Software Projects. Software Freedom Law Center (June 4, 2008)https://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2008/foss-primer.pdf archived athttps://perma.cc/2CMH-UP4G.o Read Chapter 2 only.HOUSE OVERSIGHT 024267Day 8: GovernanceThe tensions between free vs. proprietary software help focus us on foundational questions ofgovernance that are threaded through the course. To what extent should new technologies beshaped and shared by anyone without gatekeeping? 2017 may find the Internet in middle age.Do its puzzles suggest anything about whether and how to resolve governance questions formore newly mainstreamed technologies like machine learning and other Al?In addition to the challenges that the Internet has provided in regulation and governance, theinability to really understand what many "learned" algorithms do, and their ability to haveproperties and abilities beyond the capabilities of their initial designers, presents additionalchallenges when thinking about whether and how to regulate the research, as well as thedeployment, of Al. Phenomena like digital currencies and distributed Al systems reprises theideas and challenges of Barlow's declaration of independence of cyberspace.Readings:Governance: loT Security• J.M. Porup, "Internet of Things' security is hilariously broken and getting worse" ArsTechnica (January 23, 2016)http://arstechnica.com/security/2016/01/how-to-search-the-internet-of-things-for-photos-of-sleeping-babies/ archived at https://perma.cc/R8LZ-MULJ.• Nicole Perlroth, "Hackers Used New Weapons to Disrupt Major Websites Across U.S."The New York Times (October 21, 2016)http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/22/business/internet-problems-attack.html.Governance: Algorithmic Accountability• Jonathan Zittrain, "Facebook Could Decide an Election Without Anyone Ever FindingOut," New Republic (June 1, 2014)https://newrepublic.com/article/117878/information-fiduciary-solution-facebook-digital-gerrymandering archived at https://perma.cc/ED8B-C7YL.• Carole Cadwalladr, "Google, democracy and the truth about internet search," TheGuardian (December 4, 2016)https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/dec/04/google-democracy-truth-internet-search-facebook archived at https://perma.cc/JC7F-XDUM.• Cathy O'Neil, Weapons Of Math Destruction : How Big Data Increases Inequality AndThreatens Democracy [e-book]. New York: Crown; 2016. Available from: eBookCollection (EBSCOhost), Ipswich, MA. Accessed December 10, 2016o Read the Introduction and Chapter 1 (will print for the students)• Jack Balkin and Jonathan Zittrain, "A Grand Bargain to Make Tech CompaniesTrustworthy," The Atlantic (October 3, 2016)http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2016/10/information-fiduciary/502346/archived at https://perma.cc/QXX4-VASM.HOUSE OVERSIGHT 024268Artificial Intelligence• Joichi Ito, Extended Intelligence (February, 2016)http://www.pubpub.org/pub/extended-intelligence.• Joichi Ito, Society in the Loop (June 23, 2016)https://joi.ito.com/weblog/2016/06/23/society-in-the-.html archived athttps://perma.cc/AU7Y-BABZ.• Kevin Kelly, "The Three Breakthroughs That Have Finally Unleashed Al on the World,"Wired (October 17, 2014) https://www.wired.com/2014/10/future-of-artificial-intelligence/archived at https://perma.cc/CA2Y-3T58.• Kate Crawford and Ryan Cab, "There is a Blind Spot in Al Research," Nature (October13, 2016) http://www.nature.com/news/there-is-a-blind-spot-in-ai-research-1.20805archived at https://perma.cc/5EZ5-HWQJ.• Azim Shariff, lyad Rahwan and Jean-Francois Bonnefon, "Whose Life Should Your CarSave?" The New York Times (November, 3, 2016)http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/06/opinion/sunday/whose-life-should-your-car-save.htm• John Danaher, "Is Effective Regulation of Al Possible? Eight Potential RegulatoryProblems" Philosophical Disquistions (July 7, 2015)http://philosophicaldisquisitions.blogspot.com/2015/07/is-effective-regulation-of-ai-possible.html archived at https://perma.cc/2GBN-FVMM.• John Danaher, "Is Anyone Competent to Regulate Artificial Intelligence?" PhilosophicalDisquistions (November 16, 2015)http://philosophicaldisquisitions.blogspot.ie/2015/11/is-anyone-competent-to-regulate.html archived at https://perma.cc/LZ9L-HZJY.Day 9: Conclusion• John Perry Barlow, "A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace," ElectronicFrontier Foundation (February 8, 1996) https://www.eff.org/cyberspace-independencearchived at https://perma.cc/H2CZ-N2EX.• Locke, Levine, Searls, & Weinberger, The Cluetrain Manifesto: 95 Theses (1999)http://www.cluetrain.com/book/95-theses.html archived at https://perma.cc/2BLT-6ZEL.• Ethan Zuckerman, "The Internet's Original Sin," The Atlantic (August 14, 2014)http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2014/08/advertising-is-the-internets-original-sin/376041/ archived at https://perma.cc/C7D5-754L?type=image.• Maciej Ceglowski, "An Internet With A Human Face," Idle Words (May 2014)http://idlewords.com/talks/internet with a human face.htm.• Weinberger & Searls, Cluetrain Manifesto: New Clues (2015)http://newclues.cluetrain.com/ archived at https://perma.cc/P7K9-UXXP.HOUSE OVERSIGHT 024269