File 026598
Opinion: The Case for Naming a U.S. Secretary of Culture (File 026598)
Los Angeles Times opinion piece by music critic Mark Swed arguing for the creation of a Cabinet-level Department of Culture to give arts and humanities a stronger voice in government.
Summary
Music critic Mark Swed's 2013 Los Angeles Times opinion column advocates for President Obama to create a Cabinet-level Secretary of Culture position, comparing U.S. arts funding unfavorably to other nations and arguing that cultural representation is essential to national identity. Swed criticizes the vulnerability of the National Endowment for the Arts and proposes that a cultural ministry would provide stability and a moral voice in government. He nominates Peter Sellars and Leon Botstein as potential candidates for such a position.
The case for naming a U.S. secretary of Culture - latimes.com Page 1 of 3latimes.com/entertainment/arts/culturena-et-cm-secretary-of-culture-notebook-20130120,0,162825.storylatimes.comThe case for naming a U.S. secretary of CultureMusic critic Mark Swed says it's time we have someone in the Cabinet who canspeak to our common identity: Arts and the humanities help us figure out who weare.By Mark Swed, Los Angeles Times Music Critic6:00 AM PST, January 19, 2013Along with adding the finishing touches to hisinaugural address on Monday, President Obama hasplenty on his plate. He is consumed by theresponsibilities of selecting new Cabinet members andpreparing strategies to get them confirmed. He alreadyhad his fair share of critics, and the last thing he needsis a music critic telling him how to run the country.So I'm sorry to have to be the one to remind you, Mr.President, that you've left someone out. Secretary ofCulture. It's time.Despite a troubling international reduction ofgovernment support for the arts thanks to the worldeconomic crises, most countries still manage tomaintain ministries of culture, and not just seats ofWestern civilization such as France, Italy, Spain, Great Britain and Greece but also in Albania, Brazil,Haiti, Ethiopia, Cambodia and about 50 other countries. We, instead, have the National Endowmentfor the Arts and the National Endowment for the Humanities.advertiserneirtRICHARD JACKSONAin't Painting a PainFeORANGE COUNTY MUSEUM OF ARTPHOTOS: Arts and culture in pictures by The TimesI'm a great supporter of these institutions, but I'm calling for their removal and the creation of a newCabinet-level agency for culture. The NEA, to which I've been closest in my career, is a wonderfulorganization, doing what it can to support institutions (if no longer individual artists) large and small.But it is also a political football and it is always going to be one.One of the calls to abolish the NEA, for instance, came from Mitt Romney in last year's campaign, aspart of his proposal to balance the budget But during the debates Obama failed to note thatinvestment in the arts is a more reliable jobs creator than in nearly all industries, nor is it easilyoutsourced. That has been an idee fixe of the Obama-appointed outgoing NEA head, Roccohttp://www.latimes.cornientertainmentiarts/culture/la-et-cm-secretary-of-culture-notebook-... 3/27/2013The case for naming a U.S. secretary of Culture - latimes.com Page 2 of 3Landesman. Even so, Landesman's budget got slashed 13% for fiscal 2012 to an embarrassing $146million.As arts supporters love to point out, that is less than half of the budget the Pentagon provides formilitary bands alone. In cash-strapped France, on the other hand, Minister of Culture andCommunication Aurelie Filippetti was enraged when President Francois Hollande cut the 2013 budgetof her department 4.3% to 7.363 billion euros, which is just under $10 billion. According toLandesman, the U.S. remains the weakest funder of arts in the developed world.From the start, Obama had seemed a good prospect for becoming an arts president, and four yearsago, as he was about to assume office, 76,000 people signed a petition, instigated by Quincy Jones,begging the new president to create a Cabinet-level cultural ministry patterned after France's. He hasstepped out to arts events and invited artists from many genres to the White House. But he's kept thatpretty low profile. The arts can be a lightning rod among populist politicians, and Washington isdivided enough as it is. Clearly Obama has had other preoccupations than cabinetizing culture. Butthat divisiveness is precisely why we need a Cabinet-level spokesperson for culture. We have come tosee ourselves as a country of opposites. The allocation of public funds for just about anything isviewed as a war between the rich and the poor. We color our states red or blue. Some of us love guns;some of us hate them. Go down the line, and there appears to be less and less on which we agree.One thing we do have in common is our identity. Wherever we are on whatever spectrum, we seeourselves as Americans. It is that culture that makes everything else matter. The arts and thehumanities help us figure out who we are.A Department of Culture, into which the current NEA and NEH might be folded, may not beprotected from budgetary vulnerability, but it would at least have more prestige and perhaps morestability. It would also empower a public spokesperson for culture.Maybe even more essential is the influence a secretary of Culture could have in a way-too-wonkyWashington. I know there aren't regular Cabinet meetings anymore where all the secretaries gatheraround a big table and hash out all the issues of the country. Imagine, though, a perfect White House,where Cabinet officials did often collect, and among them sat a political outsider, a generalist whocould offer rich historical insight from the humanities and visionary thinking from the arts.PHOTOS: Arts and culture in pictures by The TimesIdeally, a secretary of Culture should be a political outsider, able to function as a moral conscience forall decision making. He or she would further serve as someone able to ask the hard questions, to seethe world from possibly unexpected angles and help prompt new solutions to old problems. As artistsknow and politicians refuse to acknowledge, all you have to do to create change is change your mind.So whom could we get? Who could speak in such a way that the right and left would listen? Whofrom the arts or the humanities could possibly win the respect of expert wonks? Who could inspire adivided nation?I've saved my suggestions for last because you're going to think them outlandish. They're not.First, I nominate Peter Sellars. Stop laughing How is an L.A.-based theater, opera and festivaldirector who sports spiky hair, strings his own beads, buys his clothes at thrift shops and regularlyhttp://www.latimes.com/entertainment/arts/culture/la-et-cm-secretary-of-culture-notebook-... 3/27/2013The case for naming a U.S. secretary of Culture - latimes.com Page 3 of 3courts controversy ever going to become a national spokesperson, to say nothing of a Washingtonofficial?Sellars, however, happens to be one of the most persuasive and inspirational public figures we have.He exhibits a bottomless empathy and spirituality with broad reach. Yes, some of his productionshave been left-leaning, but he can, one on one, reach just about everyone. He is politically motivatedand sophisticated. He thinks profoundly about social issues.He also has a way with politicians. A few years ago he was asked to speak at the World EconomicForum in Davos, Switzerland, about nuclear proliferation — something he became highlyknowledgeable about when he and composer John Adams put on "Doctor Atomic," an opera about thecreation of the atomic bomb. Sellars held heads of state in awe.My second nomination is Leon Botstein, president of Bard College in New York state. He is one ofour few remaining public intellectuals and a renaissance man, which means he is a conductor,educator and scholar. He too is unusually persuasive when speaking on any number of issues to anykind of audience.Yes, he's also a liberal, one who as a young man could hold his brilliant own against William F.Buckley on "Firing Line." But he is just as brilliant an administrator who, in his nearly 40-year tenureat Bard, has made the school into one of the most progressive and prominent humanities colleges inthe country by appealing to donors on all sides of the political spectrum. He's an egghead who goes on"The Colbert Report."Botstein makes things happen, and he makes them happen by persuading people to look beyond theirpreconceptions, to view society in broad and grand terms. He is someone politicians and the peoplecould listen to.So what is the likelihood that Obama will announce on the steps of the Capitol on Monday that overthese next four years he wants to make the arts a national priority and for that reason he is nownominating Sellars or Botstein to the newly created post of secretary of Culture? Zero. He's not crazy.Still, if Albania can have one, why can't we?markswed(C)jaames.cornMOREINTERACTIVE: Christopher Depictions of violence inHawthorne's On the Boulevardstheater and moreCopyright 2013, Los Angeles Timeshttp://www.latimes.com/entertainment/arts/culture/la-et-cm-secretary-of-culture-notebook-... 3/27/2013PHOTOS: Arts and culture inpictures