File 025202
Email Forward of Anita Hill Affidavit Leak Narrative - Clarence Thomas Confirmation Controversy (File 025202)
Email containing a first-person account from an anonymous Senate staffer describing the decision to leak Anita Hill's sexual harassment affidavit against Supreme Court nominee Clarence Thomas, including details of an overheard conversation between Thomas, Senators Hatch and Simpson.
Summary
An anonymous female Republican Senate aide recounts overhearing a conversation on October 5, 1991, between Judge Clarence Thomas, Senator Orrin Hatch, and Senator Alan Simpson, one day before Thomas's Senate confirmation. The aide describes how Thomas and the senators jokingly discussed explicit pornographic content, and how Thomas's flippant comments about having discussed abortion with Anita Hill prompted her to leak Hill's affidavit to NPR reporter Nina Totenberg. The account provides context for her decision to expose the harassment allegations that were initially dismissed by the Judiciary Committee.
From: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]Sent: 9/18/2018 10:40:13 PMTo: paul krassner [Subject: Re: deja' vu' by pkgreatOn Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 3:48 PM, paul krassner <________________________________ wrote:Why I Leaked the Anita Hill AffidavitI shall identify myself only as a female aide to a Republican senator. It is also relevant that I have longnurtured a keen interest in psycho-history, the process by which a nation's direction is interpreted as an extensionof the psychological makeup of those individuals who govern it.Without going into specific detail, let me simply state that on October 5, 1991, I happened to hear part ofa conversation among Judge—now Supreme Court Justice—Clarence Thomas, Senator Orrin Hatch and SenatorAlan Simpson. The three were meeting informally one week after the Judiciary Committee voted, first 7-7, then13-1, to recommend the confirmation of Judge Thomas, and one day after the full Senate indicated that he wouldbe confirmed.The conversation I happened to hear had to do with those charges brought by Anita Hill and ignored by themembers of the committee, both Democratic and Republican. At that point in time I still thought this was anappropriate response, because the alternative would have been to hold an executive session, and Judge Thomaswould then have had no practical choice but to resort to heavy denial. Now, however, these men were, in ajocular fashion, acknowledging the truth of what would turn out to be Professor Hill's allegations.Senator Simpson was saying, "Y'know, Clarence, I've seen some pretty raunchy porno movies in my time,but I never did see one where a lady was having sex with an animal.""I'll never forget it," Judge Thomas replied in his riveting sonorous tone. "They were in a barn. Exceptthat the inside of the barn was like a theater."Senator Hatch interjected, "Summer stock, eh? No pun intended"HOUSE OVERSIGHT 025202"There was a stage at one end," Judge Thomas continued his description, "and the stage was facing rowsand rows of wooden folding chairs. There were haystacks piled up on the stage, and in front of the haystacksthere was a beautiful, buxom, blond woman—and a donkey. Well, the woman began disrobing and she startedstroking the donkey to arousal.""Doesn't sound at all sleazy to me," Senator Simpson said."Actually, it had Beethoven piano sonatas playing in the background," Judge Thomas said. "Well, whenthe woman was fully disrobed and the donkey was fully aroused, they began copulating, right there in front ofthose haystacks on the stage of that barn. Slow and sensual. Then bumping and grinding away, accompanied bypassionate moans and wild braying. You've never seen a sight like this, I promise. And then the camera pannedslowly toward the audience . . . and the audience consisted entirely of donkeys."The Senate office shook with raucous laughter, especially that of Judge Thomas. His booming guffawsrang like huge gongs in a church belfry. And, I must admit, I had to suppress my own laughter. I had been totallycaught by surprise, but I appreciated getting the insight. Homo sapiens is, in reality, the only species that has aneed for pornography.When the group's laughter finally began to simmer down, Senator Hatch said, "I suppose that movie wasone of the demands of the animal rights people.""That's correct," Senator Simpson added. "Saving animals' lives is no longer enough. They need culture."I felt like I was imprisoned in the boys' locker room, but I was getting ready to force myself to leaveanyway, and it would have ended right there for me if the subject matter hadn't returned to Anita Hill."I'm glad nobody considered calling her to testify against me, even for a closed-door session," JudgeThomas said. "But you fellas will really love this. Anita Hill was a very opinionated young lady. Actually, sheand I once had an extremely animated discussion on the decriminalization of abortion. Can you imagine whatthe Democrats would've done with that?"And that was the precise instant I made the decision to leak Professor Hill's statement to the press. AlthoughI have constantly been sexually hassled, I have never really been harassed in the legal sense of the word.HOUSE OVERSIGHT 025203However, I have had an abortion, and I was totally outraged by the blatant hypocrisy I'd overheard. I had neverleaked a document before, but my anger overshadowed my fear.I chose Nina Totenberg because I had come to trust her reporting about the Supreme Court on NationalPublic Radio. I honestly had no idea what leaking the affidavit would accomplish. I certainly did not envisionthat it would literally embarrass the Senate into delaying the vote until public hearings were held, though thatprobably was my secret desire.But Judge Thomas testified under oath that he had never discussed the subject of abortion. However, inresponse to a question by Senator Hank Brown, Professor Hill testified that she had disagreed with Judge Thomasin a discussion about Roe v. Wade. Unfortunately, then-Senator Joseph Biden quickly interrupted her."That is not the subject of these hearings," he said.Personally, I feel quite disappointed about that particular aspect of the testimony, but I have not the slightestregret over leaking Anita Hill's affidavit, and I would gladly do it all over again.I certainly set a higher moral standard for myself than did the staffer for Senator John Danforth who wroteJudge Thomas's statement that began, "Nobody helped me with this."please noteThe information contained in this communication isconfidential, may be attorney-client privileged, mayconstitute inside information, and is intended only forthe use of the addressee. It is the property ofJEEUnauthorized use, disclosure or copying of thiscommunication or any part thereof is strictly prohibitedand may be unlawful. If you have received thiscommunication in error, please notify us immediately byreturn e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, anddestroy this communication and all copies thereof,including all attachments. copyright -all rights reservedHOUSE OVERSIGHT 025204